Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 1.756
Filter
1.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38973049

ABSTRACT

Large vestibular aqueduct syndrome(LVAS) is a common recessive hereditary hearing loss disease, and some patients may also experience vestibular dysfunction. With the wide application of cochlear implant(CI) and the development of vestibular medicine, the pathophysiological mechanism of LVAS and the influence mechanism of CI on vestibular function are gradually elucidated. Consequently, the evaluation and rehabilitation of vestibular dysfunction function have also become research hotspots. This article reviews studies on vestibular function and related rehabilitation in patients with large vestibular aqueduct syndrome.


Subject(s)
Vestibular Aqueduct , Humans , Vestibular Aqueduct/abnormalities , Cochlear Implants , Vestibular Diseases/rehabilitation , Vestibular Diseases/physiopathology , Cochlear Implantation , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/rehabilitation , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/physiopathology , Vestibule, Labyrinth/physiopathology
2.
Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex ; 81(3): 162-169, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38941647

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The cochlear implant (CI) is effective for rehabilitating patients with severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss. However, its placement and use have been associated with various complications, such as those affecting the vestibular system. The objective of this study was to compare vestibular function using the video head impulse test (vHIT) in pediatric patients before and after CI placement. METHODS: A descriptive and retrospective study was conducted. The outcomes of 11 pediatric patients of both sexes with a history of profound hearing loss were evaluated. The results of vestibular-ocular reflex (VOR) gain, saccades, asymmetry, Pérez Rey (PR) index, and VOR/saccade ratio for both ears obtained by the vHIT test before and after CI placement were compared. RESULTS: Of the 11 patients evaluated, the VOR gain showed that 81.8% had normal function, 18.2% had hypofunction, and no patients had hyperfunction before implantation. No statistically significant differences were found when compared with post-implant off and post-implant on conditions (p > 0.05). The extracted variables, asymmetry, PR index, and the VOR/saccades ratio also showed no statistically significant differences between the pre- and post-implant conditions, whether off or on. CONCLUSIONS: The vestibular function of pediatric patients did not show significant changes before and after CI placement. The vHIT test is a valuable tool for assessing vestibular function and could be considered a criterion for surgical and rehabilitation decisions in patients undergoing CI placement.


INTRODUCCIÓN: El implante coclear es un dispositivo eficaz para la rehabilitación de pacientes con hipoacusia neurosensorial severa a profunda. Sin embargo, su colocación y uso se ha asociado a diversas complicaciones, entre ellas a nivel del sistema vestibular. El objetivo del presente estudio fue comparar la función vestibular mediante la prueba de videoimpulso cefálico (vHIT) de pacientes pediátricos antes y después de la colocación del implante coclear. MÉTODOS: Se llevó a cabo un estudio descriptivo y retrospectivo. Se evaluaron los resultados de 11 pacientes pediátricos de ambos sexos con antecedente de hipoacusia profunda. Se compararon los resultados de ganancia del VOR, sacadas, asimetría, índice PR así como la relación VOR/sacadas para ambos oídos obtenidos mediante la prueba vHIT antes y después de la colocación del implante coclear. RESULTADOS: De los 11 pacientes evaluados, la ganancia del VOR mostró que el 81.8% tenía normofunción, 18.2% hipofunción y ningún paciente hiperfunción antes del implante. Al compararlo con la ganancia post implante apagado y post implante encendido no se encontraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas (p > 0.05). Las variables sacadas, asimetría, índice PR así como la relación VOR/sacadas tampoco mostraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre las condiciones pre y pos implante ya sea apagado o encendido. CONCLUSIONES: La función vestibular de pacientes pediátricos no mostró cambios significativos previo y posterior a la colocación del implante coclear. La prueba vHIT es una herramienta útil que permite evaluar la función vestibular y que podría considerarse como criterio para tomar decisiones quirúrgicas en pacientes que se encuentran en protocolo para implante coclear.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Head Impulse Test , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Reflex, Vestibulo-Ocular , Humans , Female , Male , Head Impulse Test/methods , Retrospective Studies , Child , Child, Preschool , Reflex, Vestibulo-Ocular/physiology , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/diagnosis , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/physiopathology , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/rehabilitation , Video Recording , Saccades/physiology , Adolescent , Vestibule, Labyrinth/physiopathology
3.
Sci Prog ; 107(2): 368504241262195, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38872447

ABSTRACT

A vestibular schwannoma is a benign tumor; however, the schwannoma itself and interventions can cause sensorineural hearing loss. Most vestibular schwannomas are unilateral tumors that affect hearing only on one side. Attention has focused on improving the quality of life for patients with unilateral hearing loss and therapeutic interventions to address this issue have been emphasized. Herein, we encountered a patient who was a candidate for hearing preservation surgery based on preoperative findings and had nonserviceable hearing after the surgery, according to the Gardner-Robertson classification. Postoperatively, the patient had decreased listening comprehension and ability to localize sound sources. He was fitted with bilateral hearing aids, and his ability to localize sound sources improved. Although the patient had postoperative nonserviceable hearing on the affected side and age-related hearing loss on the unaffected side, hearing aids in both ears were useful for his daily life. Therefore, the patient was able to maintain a binaural hearing effect and the ability to localize the sound source improved. This report emphasizes the importance of hearing preservation with vestibular schwannomas, and the demand for hearing loss rehabilitation as a postoperative complication can increase, even if hearing loss is nonserviceable.


Subject(s)
Hearing Aids , Neuroma, Acoustic , Humans , Neuroma, Acoustic/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/surgery , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/rehabilitation , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/etiology , Quality of Life , Hearing Loss/etiology , Hearing Loss/surgery , Hearing Loss/rehabilitation , Postoperative Complications/etiology
4.
Noise Health ; 26(121): 220-225, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38904826

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Digital noise reduction (DNR) minimizes the effect of noise on speech signals by continuously monitoring frequency bands in the presence of noise. In the present study, we explored the effect of DNR technology on speech intelligibility in individuals using hearing aids (HAs) and investigated implications for daily use. METHODS AND MATERIAL: Eighteen participants with bilateral moderate sensorineural hearing loss (aged 16-45 years) were included. Bilateral receiver-in-the-ear HAs were fitted in the participants. The adaptive and nonadaptive (with a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of +5 and -5 dB, respectively) Turkish matrix sentence test (TURMatrix) in noise and free-field hearing assessments, including hearing thresholds with hearing aids, speech recognition thresholds (SRT), and speech discrimination scores, were conducted in two different conditions: HA in the DNR-on and DNR-off conditions. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed between free-field hearing assessments with the HA in the DNR-off and DNR-on conditions (P > 0.05). Furthermore, the adaptive and nonadaptive TURMatrix revealed significant differences between the scores under the DNR-on and DNR-off conditions (P < 0.05). Nevertheless, under the DNR-on condition, there was no correlation between free-field hearing assessments with HA and TURMatrix results (P > 0.05). However, a significant correlation was observed between SRT scores with HA and TURMatrix scores (adaptive and nonadaptive, +5 and -5 dB SNR, respectively) under the DNR-off condition (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our study findings suggest that DNR can improve speech intelligibility in noisy environments. Therefore, DNR can enhance an individual's auditory comfort by improving their capacity to grasp speech in background noise.


Subject(s)
Hearing Aids , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Noise , Speech Intelligibility , Humans , Adult , Male , Middle Aged , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/rehabilitation , Female , Young Adult , Adolescent , Signal-To-Noise Ratio , Auditory Threshold , Speech Perception , Speech Reception Threshold Test
5.
Otol Neurotol ; 45(6): 635-642, 2024 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38769110

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate if cartilage conduction (CC) rerouting devices are noninferior to air-conduction (AC) rerouting devices for single-sided deafness (SSD) patients by measuring objective and subjective performance using speech-in-noise tests that resemble a realistic hearing environment, sound localization tests, and standardized questionnaires. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, single-subject randomized, crossover study. SETTING: Anechoic room inside a university. PATIENTS: Nine adults between 21 and 58 years of age with severe or profound unilateral sensorineural hearing loss. INTERVENTIONS: Patients' baseline hearing was assessed; they then used both the cartilage conduction contralateral routing of signals device (CC-CROS) and an air-conduction CROS hearing aid (AC-CROS). Patients wore each device for 2 weeks in a randomly assigned order. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Three main outcome measures were 1) speech-in-noise tests, measuring speech reception thresholds; 2) proportion of correct sound localization responses; and 3) scores on the questionnaires, "Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit" (APHAB) and "Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale" with 12 questions (SSQ-12). RESULTS: Speech reception threshold improved significantly when noise was ambient, and speech was presented from the front or the poor-ear side with both CC-CROS and AC-CROS. When speech was delivered from the better-ear side, AC-CROS significantly improved performance, whereas CC-CROS had no significant effect. Both devices mainly worsened sound localization, whereas the APHAB and SSQ-12 scores showed benefits. CONCLUSION: CC-CROS has noninferior hearing-in-noise performance except when the speech was presented to the better ear under ambient noise. Subjective measures showed that the patients realized the effectiveness of both devices.


Subject(s)
Bone Conduction , Cross-Over Studies , Hearing Aids , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Sound Localization , Speech Perception , Humans , Adult , Middle Aged , Male , Female , Sound Localization/physiology , Bone Conduction/physiology , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/physiopathology , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/rehabilitation , Speech Perception/physiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Prospective Studies , Hearing Loss, Unilateral/physiopathology , Hearing Loss, Unilateral/rehabilitation , Young Adult , Noise , Treatment Outcome
6.
Ear Hear ; 45(4): 837-849, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38768048

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Children with hearing loss experience greater difficulty understanding speech in the presence of noise and reverberation relative to their normal hearing peers despite provision of appropriate amplification. The fidelity of fundamental frequency of voice (f0) encoding-a salient temporal cue for understanding speech in noise-could play a significant role in explaining the variance in abilities among children. However, the nature of deficits in f0 encoding and its relationship with speech understanding are poorly understood. To this end, we evaluated the influence of frequency-specific f0 encoding on speech perception abilities of children with and without hearing loss in the presence of noise and/or reverberation. METHODS: In 14 school-aged children with sensorineural hearing loss fitted with hearing aids and 29 normal hearing peers, envelope following responses (EFRs) were elicited by the vowel /i/, modified to estimate f0 encoding in low (<1.1 kHz) and higher frequencies simultaneously. EFRs to /i/ were elicited in quiet, in the presence of speech-shaped noise at +5 dB signal to noise ratio, with simulated reverberation time of 0.62 sec, as well as both noise and reverberation. EFRs were recorded using single-channel electroencephalogram between the vertex and the nape while children watched a silent movie with captions. Speech discrimination accuracy was measured using the University of Western Ontario Distinctive Features Differences test in each of the four acoustic conditions. Stimuli for EFR recordings and speech discrimination were presented monaurally. RESULTS: Both groups of children demonstrated a frequency-dependent dichotomy in the disruption of f0 encoding, as reflected in EFR amplitude and phase coherence. Greater disruption (i.e., lower EFR amplitudes and phase coherence) was evident in EFRs elicited by low frequencies due to noise and greater disruption was evident in EFRs elicited by higher frequencies due to reverberation. Relative to normal hearing peers, children with hearing loss demonstrated: (a) greater disruption of f0 encoding at low frequencies, particularly in the presence of reverberation, and (b) a positive relationship between f0 encoding at low frequencies and speech discrimination in the hardest listening condition (i.e., when both noise and reverberation were present). CONCLUSIONS: Together, these results provide new evidence for the persistence of suprathreshold temporal processing deficits related to f0 encoding in children despite the provision of appropriate amplification to compensate for hearing loss. These objectively measurable deficits may underlie the greater difficulty experienced by children with hearing loss.


Subject(s)
Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Noise , Speech Perception , Humans , Speech Perception/physiology , Child , Male , Female , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/physiopathology , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/rehabilitation , Hearing Aids , Case-Control Studies , Adolescent , Electroencephalography
7.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 281(7): 3813-3820, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38642084

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The Microphone and Receiver in the ear (M&RIE) hearing aid is designed to consider the pinna cues by placing an additional microphone along with a standard receiver at the entrance of the ear canal. There is a need to clinically validate the technology using speech identification measures, as a literature shortage exists. The objective of the study was to evaluate speech identification and quality rating with hearing aids fitted with standard and M&RIE receivers. METHOD: Twenty individuals (mean ± SD age being 34.10 ± 11.9 years) with mild-to-moderately severe sensorineural hearing loss were divided into two groups: naïve and experienced. Their speech identification obtained using the receiver in the ear hearing aid compatible with standard and M&RIE receivers were compared. The study assessed speech identification in quiet using ten sentences, calculated SNR-50 using the Spearman-Karber equation, and used an 11-point scale for self-perceived quality rating. RESULTS: The study analyzed data using SPSS and found no significant difference between naive and experienced hearing aid users in quiet and SNR-50 conditions (p > 0.05). However, naive users rated higher in clarity, naturalness, pleasantness, and overall impression of standard receiver settings. Across different receiver settings, both naïve and experienced groups revealed better speech identification with the M&RIE receiver for both SIS (p < 0.05) and SNR-50 (p < 0.05) measures. CONCLUSION: The study found that placing a third microphone in the ear canal improves speech identification and quality rating in both naïve and experienced users, with pinna and ear canal resonance playing a crucial role in prescribing hearing aid gain.


Subject(s)
Hearing Aids , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Speech Perception , Humans , Male , Adult , Female , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/rehabilitation , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/physiopathology , Middle Aged , Young Adult
8.
Am J Audiol ; 33(2): 442-454, 2024 Jun 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38557158

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study examined children's ability to perceive speech from multiple locations on the horizontal plane. Children with hearing loss were compared to normal-hearing peers while using amplification with and without advanced noise management. METHOD: Participants were 21 children with normal hearing (9-15 years) and 12 children with moderate symmetrical hearing loss (11-15 years). Word recognition, nonword detection, and word recall were assessed. Stimuli were presented randomly from multiple discrete locations in multitalker noise. Children with hearing loss were fit with devices having separate omnidirectional and noise management programs. The noise management feature is designed to preserve audibility in noise by rapidly analyzing input from all locations and reducing the noise management when speech is detected from locations around the hearing aid user. RESULTS: Significant effects of left/right and front/back lateralization occurred as well as effects of hearing loss and hearing aid noise management. Children with normal hearing experienced a left-side advantage for word recognition and a right-side advantage for nonword detection. Children with hearing loss demonstrated poorer performance overall on all tasks with better word recognition from the back, and word recall from the right, in the omnidirectional condition. With noise management, performance improved from the front compared to the back for all three tasks and from the right for word recognition and word recall. CONCLUSIONS: The shape of children's local speech intelligibility on the horizontal plane is not omnidirectional. It is task dependent and shaped further by hearing loss and hearing aid signal processing. Front/back shifts in children with hearing loss are consistent with the behavior of hearing aid noise management, while the right-side biases observed in both groups are consistent with the effects of specialized speech processing in the left hemisphere of the brain.


Subject(s)
Hearing Aids , Noise , Speech Intelligibility , Speech Perception , Humans , Child , Adolescent , Male , Female , Case-Control Studies , Sound Localization , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/rehabilitation , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/physiopathology
9.
Trends Hear ; 28: 23312165241227815, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38545698

ABSTRACT

An objective method for assessing speech audibility is essential to evaluate hearing aid benefit in children who are unable to participate in hearing tests. With consonant-vowel syllables, brainstem-dominant responses elicited at the voice fundamental frequency have proven successful for assessing audibility. This study aimed to harness the neural activity elicited by the slow envelope of the same repetitive consonant-vowel syllables to assess audibility. In adults and children with normal hearing and children with hearing loss wearing hearing aids, neural activity elicited by the stimulus /su∫i/ or /sa∫i/ presented at 55-75 dB SPL was analyzed using the temporal response function approach. No-stimulus runs or very low stimulus level (15 dB SPL) were used to simulate inaudible conditions in adults and children with normal hearing. Both groups of children demonstrated higher response amplitudes relative to adults. Detectability (sensitivity; true positive rate) ranged between 80.1 and 100%, and did not vary by group or stimulus level but varied by stimulus, with /sa∫i/ achieving 100% detectability at 65 dB SPL. The average minimum time needed to detect a response ranged between 3.7 and 6.4 min across stimuli and listener groups, with the shortest times recorded for stimulus /sa∫i/ and in children with hearing loss. Specificity was >94.9%. Responses to the slow envelope of non-meaningful consonant-vowel syllables can be used to ascertain audible vs. inaudible speech with sufficient accuracy within clinically feasible test times. Such responses can increase the clinical usefulness of existing objective approaches to evaluate hearing aid benefit.


Subject(s)
Deafness , Hearing Aids , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Hearing Loss , Speech Perception , Adult , Child , Humans , Speech , Speech Perception/physiology , Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/rehabilitation
10.
Trends Hear ; 28: 23312165231222098, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38549287

ABSTRACT

This study measured electroencephalographic activity in the alpha band, often associated with task difficulty, to physiologically validate self-reported effort ratings from older hearing-impaired listeners performing the Repeat-Recall Test (RRT)-an integrative multipart assessment of speech-in-noise performance, context use, and auditory working memory. Following a single-blind within-subjects design, 16 older listeners (mean age = 71 years, SD = 13, 9 female) with a moderate-to-severe degree of bilateral sensorineural hearing loss performed the RRT while wearing hearing aids at four fixed signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) of -5, 0, 5, and 10 dB. Performance and subjective ratings of listening effort were assessed for complementary versions of the RRT materials with high/low availability of semantic context. Listeners were also tested with a version of the RRT that omitted the memory (i.e., recall) component. As expected, results showed alpha power to decrease significantly with increasing SNR from 0 through 10 dB. When tested with high context sentences, alpha was significantly higher in conditions where listeners had to recall the sentence materials compared to conditions where the recall requirement was omitted. When tested with low context sentences, alpha power was relatively high irrespective of the memory component. Within-subjects, alpha power was related to listening effort ratings collected across the different RRT conditions. Overall, these results suggest that the multipart demands of the RRT modulate both neural and behavioral measures of listening effort in directions consistent with the expected/designed difficulty of the RRT conditions.


Subject(s)
Hearing Aids , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Speech Perception , Aged , Female , Humans , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/therapy , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/rehabilitation , Noise/adverse effects , Single-Blind Method , Male , Middle Aged , Aged, 80 and over
11.
Sensors (Basel) ; 24(5)2024 Feb 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38475083

ABSTRACT

This paper provides a review of various machine learning approaches that have appeared in the literature aimed at individualizing or personalizing the amplification settings of hearing aids. After stating the limitations associated with the current one-size-fits-all settings of hearing aid prescriptions, a spectrum of studies in engineering and hearing science are discussed. These studies involve making adjustments to prescriptive values in order to enable preferred and individualized settings for a hearing aid user in an audio environment of interest to that user. This review gathers, in one place, a comprehensive collection of works that have been conducted thus far with respect to achieving the personalization or individualization of the amplification function of hearing aids. Furthermore, it underscores the impact that machine learning can have on enabling an improved and personalized hearing experience for hearing aid users. This paper concludes by stating the challenges and future research directions in this area.


Subject(s)
Hearing Aids , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Humans , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/rehabilitation , Machine Learning
12.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol ; 179: 111931, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38555811

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Asses the efficacy of a Vestibular-balance rehabilitation program to minimize or reverse balance disability in children with sensorineural hearing loss. METHOD: Forty-five hearing-impaired children with balance deficits (i.e., variable degrees of sensorineural hearing loss or auditory neuropathy). Thirty-five were rehabilitated with cochlear implants, and ten with hearing aids. Their age ranged from 4 to 10 years old. A Pre-rehab evaluation was done using questionnaires, neuromuscular evaluation, vestibular and balance office testing, and vestibular lab testing (using cVEMP and caloric test). Customized balances, as well as vestibular rehabilitation exercises, have been applied for three months. That was followed by post-rehab assessment, including the Arabic DHI questionnaire, PBS, BESS, HTT, and DVA test. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference in all measured parameters (including the Arabic DHI questionnaire, PBS, BESS, HTT, and DVA test) after rehabilitation. CONCLUSIONS: Vestibular-balance rehabilitation intervention positively impacts vestibular and balance functions in hearing-impaired children.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials , Vestibule, Labyrinth , Child , Humans , Child, Preschool , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/diagnosis , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/rehabilitation , Caloric Tests
13.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol ; 179: 111908, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38461681

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to develop a mobile auditory training application based on gaming for children aged 3-5 years using cochlear implants and to evaluate its usability. METHODS: 4 games were developed in the scope of the application World of Sounds; the crucible sound for auditory awareness, mole hunting for auditory discrimination, find the sound for auditory recognition, and choo-choo for auditory comprehension. The prototype was applied to 20 children with normal hearing and 20 children with cochlear implants, all of whom were aged 3-5. The participants were asked to fill out the Game Evaluation Form for Children. Moreover, 40 parents were included in the study, and the Evaluation Form for the Application was applied. RESULTS: According to the form, at least 80% of children using cochlear implants, and all children in the healthy group, responded well to the usability factors. All factors were obtained as highly useable by parents of the children using cochlear implants. The results indicated that in the healthy group, the usefulness and motivation factors were above moderate, and the other factors were highly useable. In the mole-hunting game, there was no significant difference between the groups in the easy level of the first sub-section (p > 0.05). There was a significant difference between the groups in terms of the other sub-sections of the mole-hunting game and all sub-sections of the crucible sound, find the sound, and the choo-choo games (p < 0.05). While there was no correlation between duration of cochlear implant use and ADSI scores and the third sub-section of the crucible sound game (p > 0.05); a correlation was found in the other sub-sections of crucible sound and all sub-sections of the mole hunting, find the sound, and Choo-Choo games (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: It is thought that the application World of Sounds can serve as an accessible option to support traditional auditory rehabilitation for children with cochlear implants.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Deafness , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Speech Perception , Child , Humans , Auditory Perception , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/rehabilitation , Deafness/rehabilitation
14.
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng ; 71(7): 2232-2242, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38376983

ABSTRACT

Cochlear implants (CIs) provide a solution for individuals with severe sensorineural hearing loss to regain their hearing abilities. When someone experiences this form of hearing impairment in both ears, they may be equipped with two separate CI devices, which will typically further improve the CI benefits. This spatial hearing is particularly crucial when tackling the challenge of understanding speech in noisy environments, a common issue CI users face. Currently, extensive research is dedicated to developing algorithms that can autonomously filter out undesired background noises from desired speech signals. At present, some research focuses on achieving end-to-end denoising, either as an integral component of the initial CI signal processing or by fully integrating the denoising process into the CI sound coding strategy. This work is presented in the context of bilateral CI (BiCI) systems, where we propose a deep-learning-based bilateral speech enhancement model that shares information between both hearing sides. Specifically, we connect two monaural end-to-end deep denoising sound coding techniques through intermediary latent fusion layers. These layers amalgamate the latent representations generated by these techniques by multiplying them together, resulting in an enhanced ability to reduce noise and improve learning generalization. The objective instrumental results demonstrate that the proposed fused BiCI sound coding strategy achieves higher interaural coherence, superior noise reduction, and enhanced predicted speech intelligibility scores compared to the baseline methods. Furthermore, our speech-in-noise intelligibility results in BiCI users reveal that the deep denoising sound coding strategy can attain scores similar to those achieved in quiet conditions.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implants , Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted , Humans , Deep Learning , Algorithms , Signal-To-Noise Ratio , Noise , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/physiopathology , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/rehabilitation , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/surgery , Speech Perception/physiology
15.
Ear Hear ; 45(3): 760-774, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38254265

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Hearing aid processing in realistic listening environments is difficult to study effectively. Often the environment is unpredictable or unknown, such as in wearable aid trials with subjective report by the wearer. Some laboratory experiments create listening environments to exert tight experimental control, but those environments are often limited by physical space, a small number of sound sources, or room absorptive properties. Simulation techniques bridge this gap by providing greater experimental control over listening environments, effectively bringing aspects of the real-world into the laboratory. This project used simulation to study the effects of wide-dynamic range compression (WDRC) and digital noise reduction (DNR) on speech intelligibility in a reverberant environment with six spatialized competing talkers. The primary objective of this study was to determine the efficacy of WDRC and DNR in a complex listening environment using virtual auditory space techniques. DESIGN: Participants of greatest interest were listeners with hearing impairment. A group of listeners with clinically normal hearing was included to assess the effects of the simulation absent the complex effects of hearing loss. Virtual auditory space techniques were used to simulate a small restaurant listening environment with two different reverberation times (0.8 and 1.8 sec) in a range of signal to noise ratios (SNRs) (-8.5 to 11.5 dB SNR). Six spatialized competing talkers were included to further enhance realism. A hearing aid simulation was used to examine the degree to which speech intelligibility was affected by slow and fast WDRC in conjunction with the presence or absence of DNR. The WDRC and DNR settings were chosen to be reasonable estimates of hearing aids currently available to consumers. RESULTS: A WDRC × DNR × Hearing Status interaction was observed, such that DNR was beneficial for speech intelligibility when combined with fast WDRC speeds, but DNR was detrimental to speech intelligibility when WDRC speeds were slow. The pattern of the WDRC × DNR interaction was observed for both listener groups. Significant main effects of reverberation time and SNR were observed, indicating better performance with lower reverberation times and more positive SNR. CONCLUSIONS: DNR reduced low-amplitude noise before WDRC-amplified the low-intensity portions of the signal, negating one potential downside of fast WDRC and leading to an improvement in speech intelligibility in this simulation. These data suggest that, in some real-world environments that include both reverberation and noise, older listeners with hearing impairment may find speech to be more intelligible if DNR is activated when the hearing aid has fast compression time constants. Additional research is needed to determine the appropriate DNR strength and to confirm results in wearable hearing aids and a wider range of listening environments.


Subject(s)
Hearing Aids , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Speech Perception , Humans , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/rehabilitation , Signal-To-Noise Ratio , Restaurants , Noise
16.
NeuroRehabilitation ; 54(3): 349-358, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38277310

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Sensorineural hearing loss is the most common type of permanent hearing impairment and results in postural control and motor deficits in children that may affect or delay all developmental indicators. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to investigate the efficacy of balance exercises intervention on postural control-related impairment in children with sensorineural hearing loss. METHODS: Forty students of both genders, ages ranging from 10 to 16 years, diagnosed with severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss, were selected from the Public School for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing in El-Minia district, Minia governorate, Egypt. They divided randomly into two groups, 20 (study group), received balance exercises in addition to their ordinary daily living activities. Meanwhile, the control group of 20 children practiced only the ordinary daily living activities. The outcome was assessed pre-treatment and post-treatment by Humac Balance System and Bruininks-Oseretsky Test (BOT-2) subtest (5) for balance. RESULTS: Regarding the Humac balance system and subtest (5) of BOT-2, there was a statistically significant difference between pre-treatment data and post-treatment data of the study group with a p value equal to 0.036 or less. However, no statistically significant difference was observed in the control group with a p value equal to 0.096 or more. Finally, there was a statistically significant difference between the groups with respect to the post-treatment data, where the p value was 0.014 or less. CONCLUSION: Postural control of children with sensorineural hearing loss has been improved by balance exercises.


Subject(s)
Exercise Therapy , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Postural Balance , Humans , Child , Male , Postural Balance/physiology , Female , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/rehabilitation , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/physiopathology , Adolescent , Exercise Therapy/methods , Treatment Outcome
17.
Ear Hear ; 45(1): 142-150, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37434283

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to examine the effects of hearing aid delay on the neural representation of the temporal envelope. It was hypothesized that the comb-filter effect would disrupt neural phase locking, and that shorter hearing aid delays would minimize this effect. DESIGN: Twenty-one participants, ages 50 years and older, with bilateral mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss were recruited through print advertisements in local senior newspapers. They were fitted with three different sets of hearing aids with average processing delays that ranged from 0.5 to 7 msec. Envelope-following responses (EFRs) were recorded to a 50-msec /da/ syllable presented through a speaker placed 1 meter in front of the participants while they wore the three sets of hearing aids with open tips. Phase-locking factor (PLF) and stimulus-to-response (STR) correlations were calculated from these recordings. RESULTS: Recordings obtained while wearing hearing aids with a 0.5-msec processing delay showed higher PLF and STR correlations compared with those with either 5-msec or 7-msec delays. No differences were noted between recordings of hearing aids with 5-msec and 7-msec delays. The degree of difference between hearing aids was greater for individuals who had milder degrees of hearing loss. CONCLUSIONS: Hearing aid processing delays disrupt phase locking due to mixing of processed and unprocessed sounds in the ear canal when using open domes. Given previous work showing that better phase locking correlates with better speech-in-noise performance, consideration should be given to reducing hearing aid processing delay in the design of hearing aid algorithms.


Subject(s)
Deafness , Hearing Aids , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Speech Perception , Humans , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/rehabilitation , Speech , Noise , Speech Perception/physiology
18.
Ear Hear ; 45(1): 151-163, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37553897

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study assessed hearing aid benefits for people with a normal audiogram but hearing-in-noise problems in everyday listening situations. DESIGN: Exploratory double-blinded case-control study whereby participants completed retrospective questionnaires, ecological momentary assessments, speech-in-noise testing, and mental effort testing with and without hearing aids. Twenty-seven adults reporting speech-in-noise problems but normal air conduction pure-tone audiometry took part in the study. They were randomly separated into an experimental group that trialed mild-gain hearing aids with advanced directional processing and a control group fitted with hearing aids with no gain or directionality. RESULTS: Self-reports showed mild-gain hearing aids reduce hearing-in-noise difficulties and provide a better hearing experience (i.e., improved understanding, participation, and mood). Despite the self-reported benefits, the laboratory tests did not reveal a benefit from the mild-gain hearing aids, with no group differences on speech-in-noise tests or mental effort measures. Further, participants found the elevated cost of hearing aids to be a barrier for their adoption. CONCLUSIONS: Hearing aids benefit the listening experience in some listening situations for people with normal audiogram who report hearing difficulties in noise. Decreasing the price of hearing aids may lead to greater accessibility to those seeking remediation for their communication needs.


Subject(s)
Hearing Aids , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Speech Perception , Adult , Humans , Audiometry, Pure-Tone , Case-Control Studies , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/rehabilitation , Retrospective Studies , Double-Blind Method
19.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 281(4): 1671-1681, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37803218

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: In patients with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss (USNHL), we explored both objective functional audiological gains and subjective satisfaction, indicating when a unilateral hearing aid is valuable. METHODS: Thirty-seven patients with mild-to-moderate USNHL (mean pure-tone thresholds between 25 and 70 dB) were prescribed unilateral hearing aids. Functional gain, the aided speech discrimination score (SDS), the Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) score, and the sound localization test score were collected, and a questionnaire (the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly, HHIE) completed after 1, 2, and 3 months of hearing aid use. We classified the participants as having 'no handicap' (HHIE < 17), 'mild-to-moderate handicap' (17-42), and 'significant handicap' (> 42). RESULTS: The decrease in handicap afforded by unilateral hearing aids was largest in the 'significant handicap' group (the HHIE total score fell from 59.1 to 37.2; P = 0.007). There were no between-group differences in either functional gain or the aided SDS. Only the 'significant handicap' group evidenced an improved HINT score; the composite signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) fell from - 1.5 to - 2.2 dB [S/N] (P = 0.023). The HHIE usefully indicated when a hearing aid alleviated the discomfort of USNHL; patients with unaided HHIE scores ≥ 20 evidenced significant decreases in the composite SNR (- 1.7 to - 2.0 dB [S/N]; P = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: When considering whether to prescribe a unilateral hearing aid for patients with mild-to-moderate USNHL, it is helpful to use the HHIE to evaluate discomfort. If the total score is ≥ 20, a hearing aid is appropriate.


Subject(s)
Hearing Aids , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Hearing Loss, Unilateral , Speech Perception , Humans , Aged , Prospective Studies , Audiometry, Pure-Tone , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/rehabilitation
20.
Trends Hear ; 27: 23312165231189596, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37942535

ABSTRACT

Hearing aid verification with real-ear measurement (REM) is recommended in clinical practice. Improvements, over time, in accuracy of manufacturers' initial fit mean the benefit of routine REM for new adult users is unclear. This registered, double-blinded, randomized, mixed-methods clinical trial aimed to (i) determine whether new adult hearing aid users prefer initial or real-ear fit and (ii) investigate the reasons for preferences. New adult hearing aid users (n = 45) were each fitted with two programs: the initial fit and real-ear fit, both with adjustments based on immediate feedback from the patient. Participants were asked to complete daily paired-comparisons of the two programs with a magnitude estimation of the preference, one for each of clarity/comfort in quiet/noise as well as overall preference. The results revealed gain adjustment requests were low in number and small in magnitude. Deviation from NAL-NL2 targets (after adjustment for a 65 dB SPL input) was close to zero, except at high frequencies where real-ear fits were around 3 dB closer to target. There was no difference in clarity ratings between programs, but comfort ratings favored initial fit. Overall, 10 participants (22%) expressed a preference for real-ear fit. Reasons for preference were primarily based on comfort with the initial fit and clarity with real-ear fit. It may be acceptable to fit new adult users with mild-to-moderate hearing loss without the need for REMs, if the primary outcome of interest is user preference. It remains to be seen if the findings generalize to other fitting software, other outcome measures and more severe hearing loss.


Subject(s)
Hearing Aids , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Hearing Loss , Speech Perception , Adult , Humans , Hearing Loss/therapy , Hearing Loss/rehabilitation , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/rehabilitation , Noise , Double-Blind Method
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL