Structural connectivity changes in unilateral hearing loss.

Network connectivity, as mapped by the whole brain connectome, plays a crucial role in regulating auditory function. Auditory deprivation such as unilateral hearing loss might alter structural network connectivity; however, these potential alterations are poorly understood. Thirty-seven acoustic neuroma patients with unilateral hearing loss (19 left-sided and 18 right-sided) and 19 healthy controls underwent diffusion-weighted and T1-weighted imaging to assess edge strength, node strength, and global efficiency of the structural connectome. Edge strength was estimated by pair-wise normalized streamline density from tractography and connectomics. Node strength and global efficiency were calculated through graph theory analysis of the connectome. Pure-tone audiometry and word recognition scores were used to correlate the degree and duration of unilateral hearing loss with node strength and global efficiency. We demonstrate significantly stronger edge strength and node strength through the visual network, weaker edge strength and node strength in the somatomotor network, and stronger global efficiency in the unilateral hearing loss patients. No discernible correlations were observed between the degree and duration of unilateral hearing loss and the measures of node strength or global efficiency. These findings contribute to our understanding of the role of structural connectivity in hearing by facilitating visual network upregulation and somatomotor network downregulation after unilateral hearing loss.

A Randomized Crossover Study in Single-Sided Deafness Comparing a Cartilage Conduction CROS System and an Air-Conduction CROS System.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate if cartilage conduction (CC) rerouting devices are noninferior to air-conduction (AC) rerouting devices for single-sided deafness (SSD) patients by measuring objective and subjective performance using speech-in-noise tests that resemble a realistic hearing environment, sound localization tests, and standardized questionnaires. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, single-subject randomized, crossover study. SETTING: Anechoic room inside a university. PATIENTS: Nine adults between 21 and 58 years of age with severe or profound unilateral sensorineural hearing loss. INTERVENTIONS: Patients' baseline hearing was assessed; they then used both the cartilage conduction contralateral routing of signals device (CC-CROS) and an air-conduction CROS hearing aid (AC-CROS). Patients wore each device for 2 weeks in a randomly assigned order. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Three main outcome measures were 1) speech-in-noise tests, measuring speech reception thresholds; 2) proportion of correct sound localization responses; and 3) scores on the questionnaires, "Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit" (APHAB) and "Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale" with 12 questions (SSQ-12). RESULTS: Speech reception threshold improved significantly when noise was ambient, and speech was presented from the front or the poor-ear side with both CC-CROS and AC-CROS. When speech was delivered from the better-ear side, AC-CROS significantly improved performance, whereas CC-CROS had no significant effect. Both devices mainly worsened sound localization, whereas the APHAB and SSQ-12 scores showed benefits. CONCLUSION: CC-CROS has noninferior hearing-in-noise performance except when the speech was presented to the better ear under ambient noise. Subjective measures showed that the patients realized the effectiveness of both devices.

[Recognition of unilateral auditory neuropathy in children].

Objective: This study aimed to compare the audiological characteristics between children with unilateral auditory neuropathy (UAN) and single-sided deafness (SSD) to establish a valid basis for the differential diagnosis of children with UAN. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on audiological and imaging evaluations of children with UAN and SSD who were treated at Beijing Children's Hospital of Capital Medical University between May 2015 and June 2023. There were 17 children with UAN, comprising 10 males and 7 females, with an average age of 4.7 years. Additionally, there were 43 children with SSD, consisting of 27 males and 16 females, with an average age of 6.5 years. Audiological assessments included Auditory brainstem response (ABR), Steady-state auditory evoked potential (ASSR), Behavioural audiometry, Cochlear microphonic potential (CM), Distortino-product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE), and acoustic immittance test. The results of the audiological assessment and imaging phenotypic between the two groups of children were compared and analyzed by applying SPSS 27.0 statistical software. Results: (1) The UAN group (77.8%) had a significantly higher rate of ABR wave IIIL than the SSD group (20.9%) (P<0.01). The PA thresholds at 500 Hz and 1 000 Hz of children with SSD were higher than those of children with UAN, while the ASSR thresholds at 500 Hz, 1000 Hz, 2 000 Hz, and 4 000 Hz of children with SSD were significantly higher than those of children with UAN (P<0.05). (2) The degree of hearing loss in both UAN and SSD children was predominantly complete hearing loss. The percentage of complete hearing loss was significantly higher (χ²=4.353, P=0.037) in the SSD group (93.0%, 40/43) than in the UAN group (63.6%, 7/11). However, the percentage of profound hearing loss was significantly higher in the UAN group (27.3%, 3/11) than in the SSD group (2.3%, 1/43) (Fisher's exact test, P=0.023). In terms of hearing curve configuration, the percentage of flat type was significantly higher in the SSD group (76.7%, 33/43) than in the UAN group (36.4%, 4/11). The proportion of the UAN group (27.3%, 3/11) was significantly higher than that in the SSD group (2.3%, 1/43) in ascending type (P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the hearing curves of the declining type and other types between the two groups (P>0.05). (3) The proportion of imaging assessment without abnormality was significantly more common in the UAN group (81.8%) than in the SSD group (37.1%) (χ²=6.695, P=0.015). Conclusions: Compared to children with SSD, the occurrence of wave IIIL on the ABR test was significantly more common in children with UAN. The percentage of ascending hearing curves was significantly higher in children with UAN than in children with SSD. ASSR thresholds were significantly lower in children with UAN. The normal imaging phenotype was significantly more common in children with UAN than in children with SSD.

The Latency of Auditory Event-Related Potential P300 Prolonged in School-Age Students with Unilateral Hearing Loss in a Mandarin Learning Environment.

Our study investigated the differences in speech performance and neurophysiological response in groups of school-age children with unilateral hearing loss (UHL) who were otherwise typically developing (TD). We recruited a total of 16 primary school-age children for our study (UHL = 9/TD = 7), who were screened by doctors at Shin Kong Wu-Ho-Su Memorial Hospital. We used the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised (PPVT-R) to test word comprehension, and the PPVT-R percentile rank (PR) value was proportional to the auditory memory score (by The Children's Oral Comprehension Test) in both groups. Later, we assessed the latency and amplitude of auditory ERP P300 and found that the latency of auditory ERP P300 in the UHL group was prolonged compared with that in the TD group. Although students with UHL have typical hearing in one ear, based on our results, long-term UHL might be the cause of atypical organization of brain areas responsible for auditory processing or even visual perceptions attributed to speech delay and learning difficulties.

Active TriCROS: A Simultaneous Stimulation With a (Bi)CROS System and a Hearing Aid in the Worst Ear for Severely Asymmetrical Hearing Loss.

OBJECTIVE: Severely asymmetrical hearing loss (SAHL) is characterized by a moderately severe or severe hearing loss in one side and normal or mildly impaired controlateral hearing in the other. The Active tri-CROS combines the Contralateral Routing-of-Signal System (CROS, or BiCROS if the best ear is stimulated) and the stimulation of the worst ear by an in-the-canal hearing aid. This study aims to evaluate the benefit of the Active tri-CROS for SAHL patients. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective study was conducted from September 2019 to December 2020. SETTING: Ambulatory, tertiary care. PATIENTS: Patients were retrospectively included if they had received the Active tri-CROS system after having used a CROS or BiCROS system for SAHL for at least 3 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Audiometric gain, signal-to-noise ratio, spatial localization, and the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit and Tinnitus Handicap Inventory questionnaires were performed before equipment and after a month with the system. RESULTS: Twenty patients (mean, 62 yr old) with a mean of 74.3 ± 8.7 dB HL on the worst ear were included. The mean tonal hearing gain on the worst ear was 20 ± 6 dB. Signal-to-noise ratio significantly rose from 1.43 ± 3.9 to 0.16 ± 3.4 dB ( p = 0.0001). Spatial localization was not significantly improved. The mean Tinnitus Handicap Inventory test score of the eight patients suffering from tinnitus rose from 45.5 ± 18.5 to 31 ± 25.2 ( p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: The Active tri-CROS system is a promising new therapeutically solution for SAHL.

Association Between Hearing Loss, Asymmetric Hearing, and Postural Instability.

OBJECTIVES: Recent studies have suggested that older adults with hearing loss (HL) are at a greater risk of postural instability than those with normal hearing. However, little is known regarding this association in middle-aged individuals. The relationships between HL laterality, asymmetric hearing, and posture control are similarly unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of hearing status on postural control and to explore the dose-response relationship between the hearing threshold and postural instability risk in middle-aged adults. DESIGN: This cross-sectional study included 1308 participants aged 40 to 69 years with complete audiometric and standing balance function data from the 2001-2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Speech-frequency HL was defined as a pure-tone average at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz of >25 dB in the better-hearing ear; high-frequency HL was defined as a pure-tone average at 3, 4, and 6 kHz of >25 dB. Asymmetric hearing was defined as a difference in the pure-tone average >15 dB between ears. Postural instability was defined as participants ending the modified Romberg test in condition 4. RESULTS: After adjustment for sociodemographic variables, lifestyle, and comorbidities, speech-frequency HL, except for unilateral HL, was associated with increased postural instability (mild HL: odds ratio [OR], 2.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.25-4.35; moderate-to-severe HL: OR, 3.59; 95% CI, 1.61-8.03). Compared with individuals with normal bilateral hearing, participants with bilateral HL also showed a higher risk of postural instability (OR, 2.88; 95% CI, 1.61-5.14). The OR for postural instability among participants with asymmetric hearing compared with those with symmetric hearing was 2.75 (95% CI, 1.37-5.52). Furthermore, each 10 dB increase in the speech-frequency hearing threshold was associated with a 44% higher risk of postural instability. CONCLUSIONS: Hearing loss is associated with poorer postural control. Individuals with asymmetric hearing have a higher postural instability risk compared with those with symmetric hearing. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings and the causality. Moreover, future studies are warranted to assess whether hearing aids are beneficial for the restoration of impaired balance functions.

Factors Predictive of Binaural Hearing Restoration by Cochlear Implant in Single-Sided Deafness.

INTRODUCTION: Cochlear implants (CIs) can restore binaural hearing in cases of single-sided deafness (SSD). However, studies with a high level of evidence in support of this phenomenon are lacking. The aim of this study is to analyze the effectiveness of CIs using several spatialized speech-in-noise tests and to identify potential predictors of successful surgery. METHODS: Ten cases underwent standard CI surgery (MEDEL-Flex24). The speech-in-noise test was used in three different spatial configurations. The noise was presented from the front (N0), toward the CI (NCI), and toward the ear (Near), while the speech was always from the front (S0). For each test, the speech-to-noise ratio at 50% intelligibility (SNR50) was evaluated. Seven different effects were assessed (summation, head shadow [HS], speech released of masking [SRM], and squelch for the CI and for the ear). RESULTS: A significant summation effect of 1.5 dB was observed. Contralateral PTA was positively correlated with S0N0-B and S0NCI-B (CIon and unplugged ear). S0N0-B results were positively correlated with S0N0-CIoff (p < 0.0001) and with S0Near-CIoff results (p = 0.004). A significant positive correlation was found between delay post-activation and HS gain for the CI (p = 0.005). Finally, the HS was negatively correlated with the squelch effect for the ear. CONCLUSION: CI benefits patients with SSD in noise and can improve the threshold for detecting low-level noise. Contralateral PTA could predict good postoperative results. Simple tests performed preoperatively can predict the likelihood of surgical success in reversing SSD.

Vestibular nerve deficiency and vestibular function in children with unilateral hearing loss caused by cochlear nerve deficiency.

BACKGROUND: High-resolution MR imaging enables the visualization of individual nerves in the internal auditory canal (IAC). Cochlear nerve deficiency (CND) is recognized as one of the major causes of sensory neural hearing loss (SNHL), especially in cases of unilateral hearing loss in childhood. Some patients with CND are thought to have accompanying vestibular nerve deficiency (VND). However, there have been few reports focusing on VND and vestibular function in these children. AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency of VND and vestibular dysfunction in children with unilateral SNHL caused by CND. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-eight children with unilateral SNHL, who were diagnosed with CND by 3 T-MRI, were evaluated for VND and underwent caloric testing and cervical vestibular evoked potential (cVEMP). RESULTS: Fourteen of 38 patients (37%) had VND, and eleven (29%) of the patients [ten of the patients (71%) with VND] had at least one vestibular dysfunction. The patients with VND had significantly worse hearing and an IAC of smaller diameter than did patients without VND. CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE: We should pay attention to VND as well as vestibular dysfunction in hearing loss patients with CND.

Adults with unilateral congenital ear canal atresia - sound localization ability and recognition of speech in competing speech in unaided condition.

BACKGROUND: Individuals with unilateral hearing loss show poor spatial hearing, but individual variability is high. AIMS/OBJECTIVES: To investigate if the degree of hearing loss in unilateral ear canal atresia affects horizontal sound localization and speech recognition. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve subjects with unilateral ear canal atresia without childhood hearing intervention. Previously published data from eight normal-hearing subjects in normal binaural as well as experimentally induced unilateral hearing loss served as a reference. Horizontal sound localization and recognition of speech in spatially separate competing speech were assessed. RESULTS: Linear regression analysis demonstrated a relationship between sound localization accuracy (SLA) and the air conduction pure tone average of the atretic ear (r = 0.85, p=.007). The large proportion of variability in SLA (72%) explained by the degree of hearing loss of the atretic ear indicates that binaural processing is possible. SLA was worse than for normal hearing individuals (p<.0001), and comparable to moderate simulated unilateral hearing loss (p=.13). Speech discrimination was significantly worse than normal (p<.0001) and not dependent on degree of hearing loss of the atretic ear. CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE: Individuals with congenital unilateral ear canal atresia show impaired horizontal SLA and recognition of speech in competing speech.

Rehabilitation for unilateral deafness - Narrative review comparing a novel bone conduction solution with existing options.

Patients with single sided deafness (SSD) struggle with sound localization and speech in noise. Existing treatment options include contralateral routing of signal (CROS) systems, percutaneous bone conduction hearing devices (BCHDs), passive transcutaneous BCHDs, active BCHDs, and cochlear implants. Implanted devices provide benefits in speech in noise compared to CROS devices. Percutaneous BCHDs transmit sound efficiently but have aesthetic drawbacks and skin complications. Scalp attenuation impacts passive transcutaneous BCHD performance. Active BCHDs overcome these issues and provide benefits for speech in noise. Cochlear implantation is the only existing option that restores binaural input but introduces electrical rather than acoustic stimuli to the deaf ear. Active BCHDs have been designed to maintain efficient sound transmission and avoid chronic skin irritation and cosmetic concerns that may occur with percutaneous BCHDs. Cochlear implantation may be a superior option for recently deafened SSD patients, though this requires further study. The duration of deafness, patient age and comorbidities, and a shared decision-making model among patients, surgeons, and audiologists should be considered in device selection. The aim of this manuscript is to review available devices, discuss surgical considerations for implantable devices, review available published results for speech in noise and sound quality with each device, and provide an overview to guide shared decision making for patients and providers. This review consolidates available literature and reviews experience with a newer active transcutaneous active BCHD available for use in the SSD population.

Single-sided deafness: Bone conduction devices or cochlear implantation? A systematic review with meta-analysis / Hipoacusia unilateral: ¿dispositivos de conducción de vía ósea o implantes cocleares? Una revisión sistemática con metaanálisis

OBJECTIVES: To perform a systematic review with meta-analysis of the studies published on the efficacy of bone conduction devices and cochlear implantation in single-sided deafness, through the evaluation of speech discrimination in noise, sound localization and tinnitus suppression. As a secondary outcome, patient satisfaction is also assessed. DESIGN: A systematic search in PubMed, Embase and CENTRAL was conducted, including all articles written in English and published in the last 10 years. The outcomes selected were speech perception in noise, sound localization, tinnitus intensity and, secondarily, quality of life assessment. Studies that met prospectively defined criteria were subjected to random effects meta-analyses. The review protocol is registered on PROSPERO with number CRD42019121444. RESULTS: Nineteen articles reporting a total of 210 patients (95 patients with bone conduction devices and 115 in the cochlear implantation group) were included. The meta-analysis identifies statistically significant benefits in cochlear implantation for sound localization, tinnitus suppression, in global quality of life assessment and in 2 of the 3 subscales of quality of life assessment (ease of communication and reverberation). Bone conduction devices are better regarding speech discrimination in noise and background noise quality of life assessment. CONCLUSION: Cochlear implants effectively offer better results in 2 of the 3 evaluated parameters, being a very valid option. Bone conduction devices should continue to be considered in the treatment of these patients because, in addition to allowing better discrimination in noise, patient satisfaction is greater in environments with background noise

OBJETIVOS: Realizar una revisión sistemática con metaanálisis de los estudios publicados sobre la eficacia de los dispositivos de conducción de vía ósea y los implantes cocleares en la hipoacusia unilateral, a través de la evaluación de la discriminación del habla en el ruido, la localización del sonido y la supresión del tinnitus. Como resultado secundario, también se evalúa la satisfacción del paciente. DISEÑO: Se realizó una búsqueda sistemática en PubMed, Embase y CENTRAL, incluidos todos los artículos escritos en inglés y publicados en los últimos 10 años. Los resultados seleccionados fueron la percepción del habla en el ruido, la localización del sonido, la intensidad del tinnitus y, en segundo lugar, la evaluación de la calidad de vida. Los estudios que cumplieron los criterios definidos prospectivamente fueron sometidos a metaanálisis de efectos aleatorios. El protocolo de revisión está registrado en PROSPERO con el número CRD42019121444. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 19 artículos que informaban un total de 210 pacientes (95 pacientes con dispositivos de conducción de vía ósea y 115 en el grupo de implante coclear). El metaanálisis identifica beneficios estadísticamente significativos en la implantación coclear para la localización del sonido, la supresión del tinnitus, en la evaluación de la calidad de vida global y en 2 de las 3 subescalas de la evaluación de la calidad de vida (facilidad de comunicación y reverberación). Los dispositivos de conducción de vía ósea son mejores con respecto a la discriminación del habla en el ruido y la evaluación de la calidad de vida relacionada con el ruido de fondo. CONCLUSIÓN: Los implantes cocleares ofrecen efectivamente mejores resultados en 2 de los 3 parámetros evaluados, siendo una opción muy válida. Los dispositivos de conducción de vía ósea deben seguir considerándose en el tratamiento de estos pacientes porque, además de permitir una mejor discriminación del ruido, la satisfacción del paciente es mayor en entornos con ruido de fondo

Expanding the indications for the bone anchored hearing system (BAHS) in patients with single sided deafness.

PURPOSE: Provide data to support expansion of FDA indications for the Bone anchored hearing system (BAHS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study in a tertiary otologic referral center included106 consecutive subjects who were implanted with a Bone Anchored Hearing System (BAHS) between January 2009 and January 2015 for single sided deafness. Subjects were divided into three groups by bone conduction pure tone average (PTA) of the better hearing ear: 0-20 dB (group 1), 21-40 dB (group 2) and 41-55 dB (group 3). All patients underwent BAHS implantation. Speech perception data (Hearing In Noise Test and Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant testing) was collected before and after surgical intervention. Patient-reported quality of life measures were obtained at least 6 months after activation. These included the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit and Glasgow Benefit Inventory. RESULTS: All three groups of subjects demonstrated statistically significant improvement in outcome measures following BAHS. Subject reported quality of life outcome measures demonstrated significant improvement in disability from hearing loss and in quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with single sided deafness who have bone conduction thresholds worse than 20 dB in their contralateral ear are still able to benefit significantly from BAHS.

Another 'BEE'? - Brain-Eye-Ear (BEE) Disease Secondary to HbSC Disease Masquerading as Multiple Sclerosis.

Recurrent episodes of neurological dysfunction and white matter lesions in a young adult raise suspicion for multiple sclerosis (MS). However, occlusive retinopathy, hearing loss and absence of CSF oligoclonal bands are atypical for MS and should make the clinician consider an alternative diagnosis. We describe a man with hearing loss, visual signs and symptoms, and an accumulating burden of brain lesions, who was treated for a clinical diagnosis of MS for nearly two decades. Genetic testing revealed a unifying diagnosis.

The Influence of Forced Social Isolation on the Auditory Ecology and Psychosocial Functions of Listeners With Cochlear Implants During COVID-19 Mitigation Efforts.

OBJECTIVES: The impact of social distancing on communication and psychosocial variables among individuals with hearing impairment during COVID-19 pandemic. It was our concern that patients who already found themselves socially isolated (Wie et al. 2010) as a result of their hearing loss would be perhaps more susceptible to changes in their communication habits resulting in further social isolation, anxiety, and depression. We wanted to better understand how forced social isolation (as part of COVID-19 mitigation) effected a group of individuals with hearing impairment from an auditory ecology and psychosocial perspective. We hypothesized that the listening environments would be different as a result of social isolation when comparing subject's responses regarding activities and participation before COVID-19 and during the COVID-19 pandemic. This change would lead to an increase in experienced and perceived social isolation, anxiety, and depression. DESIGN: A total of 48 adults with at least 12 months of cochlear implant (CI) experience reported their listening contexts and experiences pre-COVID and during-COVID using Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA; methodology collecting a respondent's self-reports in their natural environments) through a smartphone-based app, and six paper and pencil questionnaires. The Smartphone app and paper-pencil questionnaires address topics related to their listening environment, social isolation, depression, anxiety, lifestyle and demand, loneliness, and satisfaction with amplification. Data from these two-time points were compared to better understand the effects of social distancing on the CI recipients' communication abilities. RESULTS: EMA demonstrated that during-COVID CI recipients were more likely to stay home or be outdoors. CI recipients reported that they were less likely to stay indoors outside of their home relative to the pre-COVID condition. Social distancing also had a significant effect on the overall signal-to-noise ratio of the environments indicating that the listening environments had better signal-to-noise ratios. CI recipients also reported better speech understanding, less listening effort, less activity limitation due to hearing loss, less social isolation due to hearing loss, and less anxiety due to hearing loss. Retrospective questionnaires indicated that social distancing had a significant effect on the social network size, participant's personal image of themselves, and overall loneliness. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, EMA provided us with a glimpse of the effect that forced social isolation has had on the listening environments and psychosocial perspectives of a select number of CI listeners. CI participants in this study reported that they were spending more time at home in a quieter environments during-COVID. Contrary to our hypothesis, CI recipients overall felt less socially isolated and reported less anxiety resulting from their hearing difficulties during-COVID in comparison to pre-COVID. This, perhaps, implies that having a more controlled environment with fewer speakers provided a more relaxing listening experience.

Hearing Status and Aural Rehabilitative Profile of 878 Patients With Sporadic Vestibular Schwannoma.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To examine the hearing status and aural rehabilitative profile in a national cohort of patients with sporadic vestibular schwannoma (VS). STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of Acoustic Neuroma Association members diagnosed with sporadic VS was performed from February 2017 through January 2019. Self-reported results were used to determine the aural rehabilitative profile of respondents. RESULTS: Among survey respondents, 62.2% (546/878) were not using any hearing-assistive device at time of survey. For the 37.8% (332/878) that were utilizing hearing-assistive devices, 32.8% (109/332) reported using a behind-the-ear hearing aid, 23.8% (79/332) used a contralateral routing of signal (CROS) hearing aid, and 21.7% (72/332) used a bone conduction device. Notably, 41.9% (278/663) of patients who previously underwent tumor treatment reported utilizing a hearing rehabilitation device at some point during VS management compared to 27.0% (58/215) of those undergoing observation with serial imaging (P < .001). Of 275 patients with functional hearing in the ipsilateral ear, 26.5% (73/275) reported having used at least one type of hearing device; 24.0% (66/275) reported use of a conventional hearing aid, 0.7% (2/275) a CROS aid, and 0.4% (1/275) a bone conduction device. Among respondents reporting ipsilateral nonfunctional hearing, 44.9% (258/575) reported having used at least one type of hearing device; 13.0% (75/575) a CROS aid, and 12.3% (71/575) a bone conduction device. CONCLUSIONS: Even among a cohort with presumably elevated literacy surrounding hearing rehabilitation options, few patients with a history of unilateral vestibular schwannoma ultimately use hearing assistive devices long-term, suggesting that most patients sufficiently adjust to unilateral hearing loss or are unsatisfied with the benefits achieved with current device options. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 131:1378-1381, 2021.

Prediction of hearing outcomes by auditory steady-state response in patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss.

BACKGROUND: There has been no report on the predictive value of auditory steady-state response (ASSR) in the hearing prognosis of sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL). AIMS/OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether ASSR can be a prognostic indicator of hearing outcome in patients with SSNHL after systemic steroid treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty-three patients with unilateral mild to severe SSNHL (≤90 dB HL at 0.5k, 1k, 2k, and 4 kHz, 4FA) were included. All patients received systemic high dose steroid therapy within one month after onset. The difference between the threshold levels measured by ASSR and PTA on the same day [ASSR - PTA] was calculated. The hearing recovery (HR) was defined as a < 30 dB HL of final degree of hearing loss and a > 15 dB HL of hearing gain. RESULTS: The HR (+) group showed significantly worse ASSR predicted threshold than pure-tone threshold in univariate (t(51) = 2.412, p = .020) and multivariate analysis (OR 0.910, p = .012). The [ASSR - PTA] threshold showed significantly moderate correlation with hearing gain (r = -0.303, p = .028). CONCLUSIONS: Worse ASSR predicted threshold than pure-tone threshold predicted poor hearing outcome after systemic steroid treatment in mild to severe unilateral SSNHL.

Left Ear Hearing Predicts Functional Activity in the Brains of Patients with Alzheimer's Disease Dementia.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether central speech processing ability, as measured by hearing in noise, differs between right and left ears in adults with Alzheimer's disease related dementia (AD) as well as whether differences in central speech processing ability correlate with an fMRI-based measurement of global functional brain connectivity. METHODS: This prospective study was carried out at a tertiary referral center. Patients with an AD diagnosis and pure tone averages 40 dB HL or better were included. They were examined using resting-state fMRI and underwent central audiometric testing using the Dichotic Sentence Identification Test (DSI), the Dichotic Digits Test (DD), and the Synthetic Sentence Identification Test (SS), which test hearing in noise. DSI scores were correlated with resting-state fMRI connectivity between 361 distinct gray matter brain regions of interest (ROIs). Average global connectivity was calculated as mean functional connectivity between an ROI and the other 360 regions, a quantitative marker representing overall functional connectivity in the brain. RESULTS: Sixteen subjects had adequate fMRI and hearing data. The average age was 71.5 years old (±6.0). The average DSI score for the left ear was 40% (±34%) compared to 90% (±10%) in the right ear (P < .001). No difference between ears was noted on the DD. SS does not differentiate between ears, but worsening scores were noted with increasing background noise. Of the fMRI ROIs, 269 of the 361 had multiple comparison corrected significant correlations between global connectivity and DSI of the left ear (P = .004, r = .673), and all 269 showed higher functional connectivity for individuals with higher left DSI score. No correlations between DSI of the right ear and functional connectivity were found. CONCLUSIONS: Correlation was noted between left sided DSI and functional connectivity in patients with AD. Auditory input from the left ear was more susceptible to impairment, suggesting that side-specific auditory input may influence central auditory processing.

Behavioural performance and self-report measures in children with unilateral hearing loss due to congenital aural atresia.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the behavioural and functional performance of a group of children with conductive unilateral hearing loss (UHL) due to congenital aural atresia. METHOD: Twelve children aged 7 to 16 years (Mage 10.0, SD 3.1 years) formed the UHL group and 15 age-matched children (Mage 9.5, SD 3.6 years) with normal hearing formed the control group. Auditory skills were assessed using tests of sound localisation, spatial speech perception in noise, and self-ratings of auditory abilities (Listening Inventory for Education; LIFE and Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing scale; SSQ). RESULTS: When speech was directed to the good ear, performance was poorer than for normal hearing controls. Sound localisation abilities were impaired in children with UHL. Children with UHL reported higher levels of difficulties in classroom settings compared to children with normal hearing, particularly for activities involving listening in noise and focused listening activities. Older children self-report and parents report difficulties for their children across all SSQ scales. CONCLUSIONS: Children with UHL showed a wide range of auditory difficulties. As expected, speech recognition in noise differed from controls. Sound localisation abilities were variable; greater variability was seen for right ear hearing losses suggesting that some of these children may have developed compensatory mechanisms. Younger children identified listening difficulties for school situations where focussed auditory attention was needed. Older children and parents reported greatest difficulty for activities requiring perception of the direction, distance, and movement of sound. Higher levels of effort and inability to ignore sounds were reported as major difficulties.

Development of cortical auditory responses to speech in noise in unilaterally deaf adults following cochlear implantation.

BACKGROUND: For patients with single-sided deafness (SSD), restoration of binaural function via cochlear implant (CI) has been shown to improve speech understanding in noise. The objective of this study was to investigate changes in behavioral performance and cortical auditory responses following cochlear implantation. DESIGN: Prospective longitudinal study. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. METHODS: Six adults with SSD were tested before and 12 months post-activation of the CI. Six normal hearing (NH) participants served as experimental controls. Speech understanding in noise was evaluated for various spatial conditions. Cortical auditory evoked potentials were recorded with /ba/ stimuli in quiet and in noise. Global field power and responses at Cz were analyzed. RESULTS: Speech understanding in noise significantly improved with the CI when speech was presented to the CI ear and noise to the normal ear (p<0.05), but remained poorer than that of NH controls (p<0.05). N1 peak amplitude measure in noise significantly increased after CI activation (p<0.05), but remained lower than that of NH controls (p<0.05) at 12 months. After 12 months of CI experience, cortical responses in noise became more comparable between groups. CONCLUSION: Binaural restoration in SSD patients via cochlear implantation improved speech performance noise and cortical responses. While behavioral performance and cortical auditory responses improved, SSD-CI outcomes remained poorer than that of NH controls in most cases, suggesting only partial restoration of binaural hearing.

A Novel Bone Conduction Hearing System May Improve Memory Function in Children with Single Side Hearing loss: A Case-Control Study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of an adhesive adapter prosthesis (AAP) on memory function in pediatric subjects with single side hearing loss (SSHL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Case-control study. 19 pediatric subjects with mild to moderate SSHL treated with AAP and 15 subjects with normal hearing (control group) were included in this study. Working and short-term memory functions were tested in all subjects, in silence and noise conditions. In SSHL subjects, tests were performed before the AAP was applied (T0) and at 1-month (T1) follow-up. The control group was tested once. RESULTS: AAP significantly improved working memory function in noise as measured at T1 (p<0.01) compared with T0, but T1 scores in children with SSHL remained significantly different from the ones of the control group (p<0.01). AAP also significantly improved short- term memory function test scores at T1 compared with T0 (p<0.01), but despite being in the normal range for the subjects' age, the scores remained significantly different from those of the control group (p<0.01). CONCLUSION: In pediatric subjects with mild, moderate, and moderate-severe SSHL, restoration of bilateral hearing through AAP improved short-term memory function and working memory function in noise, as measured at 1 month follow-up; however, AAP did not seem to lead to a full restoration of such functions as measured by a comparison with healthy controls. Further studies with longer follow-ups might help elucidate whether AAP can elicit further improvements in memory functions.