Role of sonography in detection and evaluation of post liver transplant complications.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the role of sonography in revealing and characterizing liver transplant complications based on gray scale and color Doppler, describe the normal Doppler findings, and discuss the significance of distinguishing normal transient changes in the spectral waveform from findings that may suggests ominous complications. METHODS: We carried out a retrospective cross-sectional study at Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The medical records and imaging studies of a total of 122 candidates who underwent transplantation between January 2016 to February 2022 were reviewed. RESULTS: Our results showed that most patients were males with the most frequent age group being those between 54-71 years. Hepatitis B virus and hepatic cellular carcinoma were the most common indications for transplants. A total of 95 patients received a graft from a living related donor. Regarding complications, biliary issues (including leaks and ducts dilation) were the second most frequent complication after collections. Vascular complications represented 7.4% of all complications and was the leading cause of death in 4.8% of cases. Among all vascular issues encountered during liver transplant, portal vein thrombosis was the most predominant. In respect to Doppler findings, portal vein velocities and resistive index of hepatic artery had re-averaged within 7-10 post-operative days in most patients. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound plays crucial role in the post-operative management of compilations, facilitating early detection, which is substantial for the graft survival.

Life-threatening event in laparoscopic hepatic surgery: Training curriculum on sudden hepatic artery haemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: Exposure of the hepatic artery is a fundamental step in many surgeries, during which iatrogenic hepatic artery injury may occur. Although the incidence of hepatic artery haemorrhage is low, its occurrence can lead to life-threatening haemorrhage. It is difficult and dangerous to accumulate clinical experience in laparoscopic hepatic artery repair in actual patients, and simulation training models for laparoscopic hepatic artery repair are currently lacking. In this study, a 3D printed model was designed to simulate the training curriculum for sudden hepatic artery haemorrhage, but whether training with the 3D printed model could yield superior skill improvement for surgeons remained to be determined. METHODS: A new 3D printed model was designed for this study. Surgeons from the General Surgery Department of Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital participated in this simulation training. The surgical performance of each model was compared, and the authenticity of the model was evaluated and mechanically tested. RESULTS: Experienced surgeons performed better on the 3D printed model. After repeated training, inexperienced surgeons showed significant improvement of their laparoscopic hepatic artery repair skills. The authenticity of the model was generally satisfactory, but shortcomings persisted in the mechanical testing of artery wall tearing, necessitating further improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Few studies have investigated laparoscopic simulation training for sudden hepatic artery haemorrhage. This simulation model distinguishes surgeons with different levels of experience and allows those with less experience to improve their laparoscopic hepatic artery repair skills through training on the model.

Efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in patients with primary liver cancer with portal vein tumor thrombosis: a comparative analysis of different perfusion chemotherapeutic regimens.

BACKGROUND: Portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) commonly occurs in patients with primary liver cancer (PLC). Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is a treatment for patients with PLC and PVTT. Some studies have shown that combining TACE therapy with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) might improve the survival rate of PLC patients with PVTT. However, few studies have compared the different regimens of PLC with PVTT. We aimed to compare the differences between the oxaliplatin + raltetrexed regimen and FOLFOX regimen. METHODS: We divided the 248 patients into two groups. There were 60 patients in the oxaliplatin + ratitetrexed group and 74 patients in the FOLFOX group. The primary endpoints were OS and PFS. The secondary endpoints were ORR and adverse events. We used SPSS software, the Kaplan-Meier method, the t test, and the rank sum test to compare the differences between the two groups. RESULTS: The median OS was 10.82 months in the oxaliplatin + raltitrexed group and 8.67 months in the FOLFOX group. The median PFS time was greater in the oxaliplatin + raltitrexed group (10.0 months) than that in the FOLFOX group (7.1 months). The ORR was greater in the oxaliplatin + raltitrexed group than that in the FOLFOX group (18.3% vs. 13.5%; P = 0.445). The DCR in the oxaliplatin + raltitrexed group was higher than that in the FOLFOX group (70.0% vs. 64.8%; P = 0.529). However, in the subgroup analysis, the difference between them was more significant in the type II PVTT subgroup. The OS was 12.08 months in the oxaliplatin + raltitrexed group and 7.26 months in the FOLFOX group (P = 0.008). The PFS was 11.68 months in the oxaliplatin + raltitrexed group and 6.26 months in the FOLFOX group (P = 0.014). In the right branch of type II PVTT, the OS was 13.54 months in the oxaliplatin + raltitrexed group and 6.89 months in the FOLFOX group (P = 0.015), and the PFS was 13.35 months in the oxaliplatin + raltitrexed group and 6.27 months in the FOLFOX group (P = 0.030). The incidence of adverse reactions was similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the FOLFOX regimen, the oxaliplatin + raltitrexed chemoembolization regimen had longer OS, PFS time and ORR and DCR and it was safe and tolerable.

Oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy with hepatic arterial versus intravenous infusion in metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Oxaliplatin, a major drug in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), is responsible for cumulative, dose-limiting peripheral neuropathy (PN). Whether the hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) route can limit oxaliplatin-induced PN in comparison with the intravenous (IV) route has not been specifically explored so far. METHODS: We compared the frequency and severity of PN in oxaliplatin-naive patients with mCRC included in trials that evaluated treatment with oxaliplatin administered either by HAI (ACCORD 04, CHOICE, OSCAR, and PACHA-01 trials) or by IV route (FFCD 2000-05 trial). We retrieved anonymized, prospectively collected data from trial databases for the ACCORD 04, CHOICE, and FFCD 2000-05 trials and through a review of Gustave Roussy patients' electronic medical records for PACHA-01 and OSCAR trials. The primary endpoint was the incidence of clinically significant PN (grades 2 to 4) according to the cumulative dose of oxaliplatin received. Secondary endpoints were time to onset of neuropathy as a function of the cumulative dose of oxaliplatin, discontinuation of oxaliplatin for neurotoxicity, and safety. RESULTS: A total of 363 patients were included (IV, 300; HAI, 63). In total, 180 patients in the IV group (60%) and 30 patients in the HAI group (48%) developed clinically significant PN, with no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.23). No difference was shown in the time to onset of PN either (p = 0.23). CONCLUSION: The administration of oxaliplatin HAI rather than IV in the treatment of mCRC does not reduce the incidence, precocity, and severity of PN.

Intra-arterial locoregional therapies for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is the 2nd most common primary liver malignancy. For nonsurgical candidates, the primary treatment option is systemic chemotherapy, which can be combined with locoregional therapies to enhance local control. Common intra-arterial locoregional therapies include transarterial hepatic embolization, conventional transarterial chemoembolization, drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization, transarterial radioembolization with Yttrium-90 microspheres, and hepatic artery infusion. This article aims to review the latest literature on intra-arterial locoregional therapies for treating ICC. AREAS COVERED: A literature search was conducted on PubMed using keywords: intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, intra-arterial locoregional therapy, embolization, chemoembolization, radioembolization, hepatic artery infusion, and immunotherapy. Articles from 2008 to 2024 were reviewed. Survival data from retrospective and prospective studies, meta-analyses, and clinical trials were evaluated. EXPERT OPINION: Although no level I evidence supports the superiority of any specific intra-arterial therapy, there has been a shift toward favoring radioembolization. In our expert opinion, radioembolization may offer superior outcomes when performed by skilled operators with meticulous planning and personalized dosimetry, particularly for radiation segmentectomy or treating lobar/bilobar disease in appropriate candidates.

The Use of Hepatic Artery Infusion Chemotherapy for Unresectable Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer in men and women (Siegel et al. in CA Cancer J Clin 72(1):7-33). Over one-half of newly diagnosed individuals will develop liver metastases. Among those with liver-only metastatic disease, only about one in five will be candidates for potentially curable resection.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Outcomes After Hepatic Artery Reconstruction in Pediatric Liver Transplantation Using a Microscope Versus Surgical Loupe.

BACKGROUND: To review the impact of the operating microscope (OM) for reconstruction of the hepatic artery (HA) by comparing the outcomes with standard loupe reconstruction (SL) in pediatric liver transplantation (LT). METHODS: Studies comparing the application of OM and SL for the reconstruction of the HA in primary pediatric LT were included from a systematic search of MEDLINE, Cochrane Library and EMBASE from inception to June 2022. Re-transplantation, dual grafts and auxiliary transplants were excluded. Primary outcome was the rate of HA thrombosis (HAT). Secondary outcomes were graft loss and mortality. RESULTS: There were 1261 liver recipients from 9 included studies published until June 2022. There were 484 patients in the OM group and 777 patients in the SL group. HAT incidence with OM was significantly lower with OR = 0.18 (95% CI: 0.07-0.48). The 1-year graft survival was significantly better in the OM group with OR = 2.77 (95% CI: 1.13-6.80). 1-year overall mortality was also significantly lower with OM with OR = 0.39 (0.18-0.86). The use of OM did not significantly impact the incidence of HAT in the living donor liver transplant subgroup. Differences in time for hepatic HA reconstruction, total operating time and length of hospital stay did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: The use of OM has reduced the risk of HAT, graft loss and mortality in pediatric liver transplantation. Adoption of microsurgical principles in general may have contributed to the improved outcomes with SL reconstruction of HA in pediatric LT.

Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Combined with Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Versus Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) compared to TACE monotherapy for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Relevant studies were systematically searched in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases until September 1, 2023. Our analysis included 7 cohort studies encompassing a total of 630 patients. The results demonstrated that the TACE plus HAIC group exhibited significantly improved prognosis compared to the TACE alone group, as evidenced by superior rates of complete response, partial response, progressive disease, objective response rate, and disease control rate. Moreover, the TACE group displayed a lower risk of platelet reduction and vomiting when compared to the TACE plus HAIC group. None of the 7 studies reported any intervention-related mortality. In conclusion, the combination of TACE and HAIC may be recommended as a viable option for patients with unresectable HCC, given its evident enhancements in survival and tumor response rates without significant differences in adverse events when compared to TACE monotherapy. Nevertheless, additional randomized controlled trials and studies involving Western cohorts are warranted to further validate these findings.

Hepatic arterial infusion of GEMOX plus systemic gemcitabine chemotherapy combined with lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitor in large unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) plus systemic gemcitabine chemotherapy (GEM-SYS) in combination with lenvatinib and programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitor for patients with large unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (uICC). METHODS: From November 2019 to December 2022, 21 large uICC patients who underwent GEMOX-HAIC (Day 1) and GEM-SYS (Day 8) (3w/cycle) combined with lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitor were retrospectively enrolled. Local tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) were analyzed. Tumor response was assessed by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. AEs were evaluated by the common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) version 5.0. RESULTS: After a median follow-up duration of 16.0 months (range 5-43.5 months), 17 patients had died. The median OS was 19.5 months (range 9-43.5 months), and the median PFS was 6.0 months (range 2.5-38.5 months). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates were 71.4 %, 42.9 %, and 19.0 %, respectively. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year PFS rates were 33.3 %, 19.0 %, and 9.5 %, respectively. Complete response, partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease were observed in 0 (0 %), 11 (52.3 %), 5 (23.8 %), and 5 (23.8 %) patients, respectively. The disease control rate and objective response rate were 76.1 % and 52.3 %, respectively. None of the enrolled patients experienced grade 5 AEs. CONCLUSIONS: GEMOX-HAIC plus GEM-SYS in combination with lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitor was effective and well tolerated for patients with large uICC.

Transarterial (chemo)embolisation versus systemic chemotherapy for colorectal cancer liver metastases.

BACKGROUND: The liver is affected by two groups of malignant tumours: primary liver cancers and liver metastases. Liver metastases are significantly more common than primary liver cancer, and five-year survival after radical surgical treatment of liver metastases ranges from 28% to 50%, depending on primary cancer site. However, R0 resection (resection for cure) is not feasible in most people; therefore, other treatments have to be considered in the case of non-resectability. One possible option is based on the concept that the blood supply to hepatic tumours originates predominantly from the hepatic artery. Transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) of the peripheral branches of the hepatic artery can be achieved by administering a chemotherapeutic drug followed by vascular occlusive agents and can lead to selective necrosis of the cancer tissue while leaving normal liver parenchyma virtually unaffected. The entire procedure can be performed without infusion of chemotherapy and is then called bland transarterial embolisation (TAE). These procedures are usually applied over a few sessions. Another possible treatment option is systemic chemotherapy which, in the case of colorectal cancer metastases, is most commonly performed using FOLFOX (folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin) and FOLFIRI (folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, and irinotecan) regimens applied in multiple sessions over a long period of time. These therapies disrupt the cell cycle, leading to death of rapidly dividing malignant cells. Current guidelines determine the role of TAE and TACE as non-curative treatment options applicable in people with liver-only or liver-dominant metastatic disease that is unresectable or non-ablatable, and in people who have failed systemic chemotherapy. Regarding the treatment modalities in people with colorectal cancer liver metastases, we found no systematic reviews comparing the efficacy of TAE or TACE versus systemic chemotherapy. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the beneficial and harmful effects of transarterial embolisation (TAE) or transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) compared with systemic chemotherapy in people with liver-dominant unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and three additional databases up to 4 April 2024. We also searched two trials registers and the European Medicines Agency database and checked reference lists of retrieved publications. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised clinical trials assessing beneficial and harmful effects of TAE or TACE versus systemic chemotherapy in adults (aged 18 years or older) with colorectal cancer liver metastases. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were all-cause mortality; overall survival (time to mortality); and any adverse events or complications. Our secondary outcomes were cancer mortality; health-related quality of life; progression-free survival; proportion of participants dying or surviving with progression of the disease; time to progression of liver metastases; recurrence of liver metastases; and tumour response measures (complete response, partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease). For the purpose of the review and to perform necessary analyses, whenever possible, we converted survival rates to mortality rates, as this was our primary outcome. For the analysis of dichotomous outcomes, we used the risk ratio (RR); for continuous outcomes, we used the mean difference; and for time to event outcomes, we calculated hazard ratios (HRs), all with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We used the standardised mean difference with 95% CIs when the trials used different instruments. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for each outcome. We based our conclusions on outcomes analysed at the longest follow-up. MAIN RESULTS: We included three trials with 118 participants randomised to TACE versus 120 participants to systemic chemotherapy. Four participants were excluded; one due to disease progression prior to treatment and three due to decline in health. The trials reported data on one or more outcomes. Two trials were performed in China and one in Italy. The trials differed in terms of embolisation techniques and chemotherapeutic agents. Follow-up ranged from 12 months to 50 months. TACE may reduce mortality at longest follow-up (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.94; 3 trials, 234 participants; very low-certainty evidence), but the evidence is very uncertain. TACE may have little to no effect on overall survival (time to mortality) (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.01; 1 trial, 70 participants; very low-certainty evidence), any adverse events or complications (3 trials, 234 participants; very low-certainty evidence), health-related quality of life (2 trials, 154 participants; very low-certainty evidence), progression-free survival (1 trial, 70 participants; very low-certainty evidence), and tumour response measures (presented as the overall response rate) (RR 1.81, 95% CI 1.11 to 2.96; 3 trials, 234 participants; very low-certainty evidence), but the evidence is very uncertain. No trials reported cancer mortality, proportion of participants dying or surviving with progression of the disease, and recurrence of liver metastases. We found no trials comparing the effects of TAE versus systemic chemotherapy in people with colorectal cancer liver metastases. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The evidence regarding effectiveness of TACE versus systemic chemotherapy in people with colorectal cancer liver metastases is of very low certainty and is based on three trials. Our confidence in the results is limited due to the risk of bias, inconsistency, indirectness, and imprecision. It is very uncertain whether TACE confers benefits with regard to reduction in mortality, overall survival (time to mortality), reduction in adverse events or complications, improvement in health-related quality of life, improvement in progression-free survival, and tumour response measures (presented as the overall response rate). Data on cancer mortality, proportion of participants dying or surviving with progression of the disease, and recurrence of liver metastases are lacking. We found no trials assessing TAE versus systemic chemotherapy. More randomised clinical trials are needed to strengthen the body of evidence and provide insight into the benefits and harms of TACE or TAE in comparison with systemic chemotherapy in people with liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

Clinical Effectiveness and Safety of Transarterial Chemoembolization: Hepatic Artery Infusion Chemotherapy Plus Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors With or Without Programmed Cell Death Protein-1 Inhibitors for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma-A Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Locoregional treatment with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) and systemic targeted immunotherapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitors in the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) have achieved promising efficacy. The retrospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TACE and HAIC plus TKI with or without PD-1 for uHCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From November 2020 to February 2024, the data of 44 patients who received TACE-HAIC + TKI + PD-1 (THKP group) and 34 patients who received TACE-HAIC + TKI (THK group) were retrospectively analyzed. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progress-free survival (PFS), and secondary outcomes were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), conversion rates, and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: A total of 78 patients were recruited in our single-center study. The patients in THKP group had prolonged median OS [25 months, 95% confidence interval (CI) 24.0-26.0 vs 18 months, 95% CI 16.1-19.9; p = 0.000278], median PFS [16 months, 95% CI 14.1-17.9 vs 12 months 95% CI 9.6-14.4; p = 0.004] and higher ORR (38.6% vs 23.5%, p = 0. 156) and DCR (88.6% vs 64.7%, p = 0.011) compared with those in THK group. Multivariate analysis showed that treatment option and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level were independent prognostic factors of OS and PFS. The frequency of AEs were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The THKP group had better efficacy for uHCC than the THK group, with acceptable safety.

Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Combined with Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Versus Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) compared to TACE monotherapy for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Relevant studies were systematically searched in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases until September 1, 2023. Our analysis included 7 cohort studies encompassing a total of 630 patients. RESULTS: The results demonstrated that the TACE plus HAIC group exhibited significantly improved prognosis compared to the TACE alone group, as evidenced by superior rates of complete response, partial response, progressive disease, objective response rate, and disease control rate. Moreover, the TACE group displayed a lower risk of platelet reduction and vomiting when compared to the TACE plus HAIC group. None of the 7 studies reported any intervention-related mortality. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the combination of TACE and HAIC may be recommended as a viable option for patients with unresectable HCC, given its evident enhancements in survival and tumor response rates without significant differences in adverse events when compared to TACE monotherapy. Nevertheless, additional randomized controlled trials and studies involving Western cohorts are warranted to further validate these findings.

Evaluation of coeliac trunk and hepatic artery variations in thoracic CT angiography in patients with congenital heart disease.

INTRODUCTION: Understanding the variations of abdominal vascular structures is important for preventing complications of abdominal surgical procedures for gastrointestinal disease such as necrotizing enterocolitis or others that may arise in patients with congenital cardiac disease. We analysed the coeliac trunk and its branches in children with congenital heart disease to determine whether there is a greater prevalence of associated vascular abnormalities. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed thoracic computed tomography (CT) angiograms performed in our hospital in paediatric patients with congenital heart disease. We documented the anatomical variations observed in abdominal sections in which the coeliac trunk and hepatic arteries were included in the field of view. We used the Uflacker classification to describe anatomical variants of the coeliac trunk, and the Michels classification and its modified version (Hiatt classification) to describe the anatomy of the hepatic artery system. RESULTS: Our study included 178 patients with congenital heart disease. We identified coeliac trunk variants in 10.7% of the patients. Gastrosplenic trunk was to the most prevalent variant, amounting to 5.6% of total cases. We found hepatic artery variations in 19.1% of the patients. According to the Michels classification, the prevalence of accessory left hepatic artery arising from the left gastric artery as 4.5%, compared to 6.7% based on the Hiatt classification. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of coeliac trunk and hepatic artery variations in patients with congenital heart disease was not greater in our study compared to other series in the literature. Clinicians must be vigilant about the variations detected in multislice CT scans to avoid complications resulting from vascular abnormalities, especially in patients who undergo abdominal surgery.

Reducing Hospital Length of Stay and Hepatic Artery Thrombosis Rates for Children Receiving a Liver Transplant: A Single-Center Experience From 2000 to 2021.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric liver transplantation is a very resource-intensive therapy. This study aimed to identify the changes made between two epochs of management and analyze their influence on length of stay (LOS). METHODS: Data from a single center were obtained from the liver transplant and Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) databases for 336 transplants (282 children) performed between 2000 and 2021. Transplants were analyzed in two epochs, before and after July 2012, representing a change in postoperative anticoagulation management. Differences in graft recipient demographics and perioperative management factors were compared between epochs. Multivariate regression was performed to identify the complications that correlated most strongly with hospital LOS. RESULTS: There was a difference in hospital LOS between Epoch 1 (Median = 31.7 days) and Epoch 2 (Median = 26.3 days) (p < 0.001), but not in PICU LOS (E1 Median = 7.3 days, E2 Median = 7.4 days; p = 0.792). Epoch 2 saw increased use of split grafts (60.6% of total), decreased pediatric end-stage liver disease (PELD) score at transplant (Average = 16.7; p < 0.001), decreased invasive ventilation time (Average = 4.48 days; p < 0.001), and decreased hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) rates (E1 = 14.4%, E2 = 4.3%; p < 0.001) without an associated increase in bleeding rates. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital LOS has reduced in Epoch 2 due to refinements in intraoperative and postoperative management. There is increased emphasis on early extubation and increased use of noninvasive ventilatory techniques in Epoch 2. Split grafts have effectively expanded our graft donor pool and reduced transplant waitlist times.

Intra-arterial PSMA injection using hepatic arterial infusion pump in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a proof-of-concept study.

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) targeted tracers show increased uptake in several malignancies, indicating a potential for peptide radioligand therapy. Intra-arterial injection of radiotracers can increase the therapeutic window. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of intra-arterial injection of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and compare tracer uptake after intrahepatic arterial injection and intravenous injection. Three patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma received [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 through a hepatic arterial infusion pump, followed by positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). Two-three days later, patients underwent PET/CT after intravenous [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 injection. All tumours showed higher uptake on the intra-arterial scan compared with the intravenous scan: the intra-arterial / intravenous standardised uptake value normalised by lean body mass ratios were 1.40, 1.46, and 1.54. Local intra-arterial PSMA injection is possible in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Local injection increases tumour-to-normal tissue ratios, increasing the therapeutic window for theranostic applications. RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Intra-arterial Prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) injection increases the therapeutic window for potential theranostic application in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. KEY POINTS: Three patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma underwent PET/CT after intra-arterial and intravenous injection of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11. Intra-arterial injection showed higher uptake than intravenous injection. PSMA-targeted imaging could be valuable for a subset of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients.