Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 6.119
Filter
1.
Med Oncol ; 41(8): 190, 2024 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38951252

ABSTRACT

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women, and despite the development of new treatment methods and the decreasing mortality rate in recent years, one of the clinical problems in breast cancer treatment is chronic inflammation in the tumor microenvironment. Histamine, an inflammatory mediator, is produced by tumor cells and can induce chronic inflammation and the growth of some tumors by recruiting inflammatory cells. It can also affect tumor physiopathology, antitumor treatment efficiency, and patient survival. Antihistamines, as histamine receptor antagonists, play a role in modulating the effects of these receptors in tumor cells and can affect some treatment methods for breast cancer therapy; in this review, we investigate the role of histamine, its receptors, and antihistamines in breast cancer pathology and treatment methods.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Histamine Antagonists , Histamine , Receptors, Histamine , Humans , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Histamine/metabolism , Receptors, Histamine/metabolism , Histamine Antagonists/therapeutic use , Tumor Microenvironment/drug effects
3.
In Vivo ; 38(4): 2058-2063, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38936919

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIM: Postnasal drip may be related to several diseases, but not all patients are clearly diagnosed. Patients with chronic, idiopathic postnasal drip symptoms are easily overlooked, and their clinical features are yet to be identified. This study aimed to analyze the clinical features and response to first generation antihistamine-decongestant therapy in patients with chronic idiopathic postnasal drip, suggesting it as a distinct entity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study involving 157 chronic idiopathic postnasal drip patients was conducted, analyzing demographics, symptoms, and treatment response to first-generation antihistamines and nasal decongestants. RESULTS: Mean age of patients was 55.4±17.0 years old. Median duration of symptom was 36 months (range=12-66 months) and severity in the visual analogue scale was 7 (range=5-8). Throat discomfort was the most frequently associated symptom (73.7%). Cough was recorded in 30.3% of patients. Viscosity of postnasal drip was associated with rhinorrhea and throat discomfort. Of the patients, 71.6% responded positively to 1st generation antihistamine-decongestant medication. However, 25.9% of patients presented symptom re-occurrence. Patients with nasal stiffness or persistent symptoms presented a higher re-occurrence rate compared to others. CONCLUSION: This study outlines the clinical features of patients with chronic idiopathic postnasal drip and suggests it as a distinctive entity., This proposal aims to enhance diagnostic precision and promote further research in the field.


Subject(s)
Histamine Antagonists , Nasal Decongestants , Humans , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Chronic Disease , Adult , Aged , Histamine Antagonists/therapeutic use , Nasal Decongestants/therapeutic use , Nasal Decongestants/administration & dosage , Retrospective Studies , Rhinitis/diagnosis , Rhinitis/drug therapy , Treatment Outcome
4.
Emerg Med Clin North Am ; 42(3): 613-638, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38925778

ABSTRACT

Plant dermatitis is a common pathology that plagues those who work and recreate in the North American outdoors. The most common plant family to cause dermatitis is the Toxicodendron genus, which includes the plants known by the common names of poison ivy, poison oak, and poison sumac. While mortality is usually quite low for this pathology, the incidence and prevalence of the disease leads to substantial healthcare burden and financial implications across the population. The mainstays of treatment have focused on prevention, corticosteroids, and antihistamines.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Toxicodendron , Humans , Dermatitis, Toxicodendron/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Toxicodendron/therapy , Histamine Antagonists/therapeutic use
5.
Immunol Allergy Clin North Am ; 44(3): 483-502, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38937011

ABSTRACT

Urticarial vasculitis is a rare autoimmune disorder characterized by persistent edematous papules and plaques on the skin that last longer than 24 hours, often accompanied by systemic symptoms such as joint pain and fever. Unlike common urticaria, this condition involves inflammation of small blood vessels, leading to more severe and long-lasting skin lesions with a tendency to leave a bruiselike appearance. Diagnosis is challenging and may require a skin biopsy. Associated with underlying autoimmune diseases, treatment involves managing symptoms with medications such as antihistamines and corticosteroids, addressing the immune system's dysfunction, and treating any concurrent autoimmune conditions.


Subject(s)
Urticaria , Vasculitis , Humans , Urticaria/diagnosis , Urticaria/etiology , Urticaria/immunology , Vasculitis/diagnosis , Skin/pathology , Skin/immunology , Diagnosis, Differential , Histamine Antagonists/therapeutic use , Autoimmune Diseases/diagnosis , Autoimmune Diseases/immunology , Biopsy , Vasculitis, Leukocytoclastic, Cutaneous/diagnosis , Vasculitis, Leukocytoclastic, Cutaneous/immunology , Vasculitis, Leukocytoclastic, Cutaneous/etiology
6.
Immunol Allergy Clin North Am ; 44(3): 503-515, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38937012

ABSTRACT

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) affects 0.5% to 1% of the general population and is often managed by allergy and immunology specialists. Guidelines have evolved over the past several decades with an emphasis on decreasing extensive screening laboratory testing as they are of low-yield and cost-ineffective. The utility of biomarkers remains under investigation but total immunoglobulin E may be helpful in determining specific endotypes and response to omalizumab. Antihistamines and omalizumab remain the primary therapeutic options for CSU, but an expanding body of evidence supports the use of immunosuppressants and anti-inflammatory medications in refractory cases.


Subject(s)
Chronic Urticaria , Humans , Chronic Urticaria/diagnosis , Chronic Urticaria/therapy , Chronic Urticaria/drug therapy , Disease Management , Omalizumab/therapeutic use , Biomarkers , Histamine Antagonists/therapeutic use , Anti-Allergic Agents/therapeutic use , Immunoglobulin E/immunology , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use
7.
Viruses ; 16(6)2024 Jun 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38932232

ABSTRACT

Background: The effects of antihistamines on cancer risk and prognosis have been inconsistent across cancers. The aim of this multi-center cohort study was to investigate the association between antihistamine use and the risk of liver cancer in individuals with viral hepatitis. Methods: This multi-center cohort study included individuals diagnosed with hepatitis B or hepatitis C between January 2008 and March 2022. For antihistamine-treated patients, the index date was the date of antihistamine prescription, and for non-users, it was the date of hepatitis diagnosis. Participants were followed for five years, with the primary outcome of interest being new-onset liver cancer. The incidence rate and the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) along with its 95% confidence interval (CI) of the outcome were calculated. Subgroup analyses were conducted, stratified by types of viral hepatitis including hepatitis C and hepatitis B. An additional validation study was performed. Results: The study included a total of 7748 patients with viral hepatitis. The incidence rate was 12.58 per 1000 person-years in patients with viral hepatitis on antihistamines, compared to 3.88 per 1000 person-years in those without antihistamine use. After adjusting for factors including age, sex, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, laboratory data of liver function tests, comedications, and the use of antiviral therapies, the risk of new-onset liver cancer was significantly higher in patients on antihistamines (aHR = 1.83, 95% CI, 1.28-2.60). In patients with hepatitis C, the incidence rate in the antihistamine group was 15.73 per 1000 person-years, while non-users had a rate of 4.79 per 1000 person-years. Patients with hepatitis C on antihistamines had a significantly higher risk of developing liver cancer (aHR = 3.24, 95% CI, 2.16-4.86). Conclusions: This multi-center cohort study reported an increased risk of liver cancer in patients with hepatitis B or hepatitis C treated with antihistamines. Long-term follow-up studies are warranted to validate the findings.


Subject(s)
Histamine Antagonists , Liver Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Male , Histamine Antagonists/therapeutic use , Histamine Antagonists/adverse effects , Liver Neoplasms/epidemiology , Liver Neoplasms/etiology , Middle Aged , Incidence , Cohort Studies , Risk Factors , Adult , Hepatitis C/complications , Hepatitis C/drug therapy , Hepatitis B/complications , Hepatitis B/epidemiology , Aged
8.
Dalton Trans ; 53(24): 10126-10141, 2024 Jun 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38817206

ABSTRACT

Bilastine (BLA), 2-(4-(2-(4-(1-(2-ethoxyethyl)-1H-benzo[d]imidazole-2-yl)-piperidin-1-yl)-ethyl)-phenyl)-2-methylpropanoic acid, is an active antihistamine drug. With the idea of repurposing drugs from the existing pool of 'active' pharmaceutical ingredients, the therapeutic potency of bilastine as an anticancer agent was investigated via the tailored synthesis of a metal-based anticancer drug formulation of the type [BLA(phen)2M(II)]+·X-, where M = Co, Cu, and Zn and X- = NO3 and ClO4. The synthesized metal-based chemotherapeutics derived from the bilastine drug that acts as a ligand were thoroughly characterized using spectroscopic techniques, namely, UV-vis, FT-IR, and EPR (in the case of 1 and 2); 1H-NMR and 13C-NMR (in the case of 3); ESI-MS and single-crystal X-ray diffraction studies. Comprehensive biological studies (DNA binding, cleavage, and cytotoxic activity) using various biophysical and gel electrophoretic methods were carried out to validate their potential as anticancer agents. The cytotoxic activity of 'therapeutically promising' copper(II)-based drug candidate 2 was evaluated against MCF-7, MBA-MD-231, HeLa, HepG2, and Mia-PaCa-2 cancer cells via an SRB assay, and the results demonstrated 2 as a potent anticancer agent at low nanomolar concentrations against all tested cancer cells, preferably with a much superior anticancer efficacy against human pancreatic cancer cells.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , Cobalt , Coordination Complexes , Copper , Drug Repositioning , Zinc , Humans , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Agents/chemistry , Antineoplastic Agents/chemical synthesis , Copper/chemistry , Copper/pharmacology , Zinc/chemistry , Zinc/pharmacology , Crystallography, X-Ray , Coordination Complexes/pharmacology , Coordination Complexes/chemistry , Coordination Complexes/chemical synthesis , Cobalt/chemistry , Cobalt/pharmacology , Models, Molecular , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Benzimidazoles/chemistry , Benzimidazoles/pharmacology , Benzimidazoles/chemical synthesis , Drug Screening Assays, Antitumor , Molecular Structure , Piperidines/chemistry , Piperidines/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/drug effects , Cell Survival/drug effects , Histamine Antagonists/chemistry , Histamine Antagonists/pharmacology , Histamine Antagonists/chemical synthesis
9.
Adv Exp Med Biol ; 1447: 131-138, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38724790

ABSTRACT

The treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD) with oral treatments has been limited in the past due to the increased risk of adverse effects associated with oral agents. However, in recent years, a shift toward the minimization of adverse effects has been explored. Although existing treatment options like oral corticosteroids and Immunosuppressive therapies have been utilized for acute flare-ups of AD, their long-term use is limited by adverse effects and the need for lab monitoring. New systemic treatment options such as Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are emerging as a promising therapy, due to their quick onset and antipruritic features. However, the black box warning associated with this medication class requires careful selection of appropriate candidates and patient education despite early favorable safety profiles seen in AD trials. Discussion of other oral agents, like antibiotics and antihistamines, and their role in AD management are also clarified.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Atopic , Humans , Administration, Oral , Dermatitis, Atopic/drug therapy , Histamine Antagonists/therapeutic use , Histamine Antagonists/adverse effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Janus Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Janus Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/adverse effects
10.
Recenti Prog Med ; 115(4): 1-10, 2024 Apr.
Article in Italian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38742412

ABSTRACT

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a widespread disease, and its prevalence is still growing. AR may be associated with other diseases, including conjunctivitis, rhinosinusitis, asthma, food allergy, and atopic dermatitis. Diagnosis is based on history, physical examination, documentation of sensitization, such as the production of allergen-specific IgE, also using molecular diagnostics in selected patients. Treatments is based on education, engagement, allergen avoidance, non-pharmacological and pharmacological remedies, and allergen-specific immunotherapy (Ait). Symptomatic treatments mainly concern intranasal/oral antihistamines and/or nasal corticosteroids. This article also aims to discuss new management strategies for AR patients. The self-management of allergic rhinitis could include new strategies. In this regard, particular interest should be considered to intranasal corticosteroids and antihistamines without medical prescription, probiotics and other natural substances, and new formulations (tablets) of Ait.


Subject(s)
Adrenal Cortex Hormones , Desensitization, Immunologic , Histamine Antagonists , Rhinitis, Allergic , Humans , Rhinitis, Allergic/therapy , Rhinitis, Allergic/diagnosis , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/administration & dosage , Desensitization, Immunologic/methods , Histamine Antagonists/therapeutic use , Histamine Antagonists/administration & dosage , Administration, Intranasal , Allergens/immunology , Immunoglobulin E/immunology , Prevalence
11.
Adv Exp Med Biol ; 1447: 151-167, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38724792

ABSTRACT

The pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis (AD) is complex and multifactorial. However, recent advancements in the genetics and pathophysiology of AD suggest that epidermal barrier dysfunction is paramount in the development and progression of the condition (Boguniewicz M, Leung DYM, Immunol Rev 242(1):233-246, 2011). In addition to standard therapy for AD, there are a plethora of nonprescription treatment modalities which may be employed. Over-the-counter treatments for atopic dermatitis can come in the form of topical corticosteroids, moisturizers/emollients, and oral antihistamines. Though these treatments are beneficial, prescription treatments may be quicker acting and more efficacious in patients with moderate to severe disease or during flares. OTC agents are best used for maintenance between flares and to prevent progression of mild disease. Alternative and complementary treatments lack strong efficacy evidence. However, wet wraps, bleach baths, and other treatments appear to be promising when used in conjunction with conventional treatments. With the financial burden of atopic dermatitis ranging from 364 million to 3.8 billion dollars each year in the United States, we suspect this topic will gain further research attention.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Atopic , Histamine Antagonists , Nonprescription Drugs , Humans , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Dermatitis, Atopic/drug therapy , Emollients/therapeutic use , Histamine Antagonists/therapeutic use , Nonprescription Drugs/therapeutic use
12.
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) ; 52(3): 8-16, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38721950

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Anaphylaxis proportions of incidence are increasing globally. However, limited data are available regarding anaphylaxis in the pediatric population of Greece. PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to evaluate management of anaphylaxis in Greek pediatric departments. METHODS: We performed a questionnaire-based study of children aged less than 16 years presenting with anaphylaxis in 10 national pediatric hospitals over a period of 2 years. Management of anaphylaxis was assessed prior to and after an informative intervention. RESULTS: In all, 127 cases of anaphylaxis were identified. Epinephrine was administered in almost half of all cases (51.2%), predominantly through intramuscular route (88.5%), while the majority of anaphylaxis patients were treated with antihistamines (92.9%) and corticosteroids (70.1%). Epinephrine was more likely administered by physicians if the elicitor was a drug (P < 0.003). Regarding long-term management, an epinephrine auto-injector was prescribed in 66.9% of patients. Follow-up information was available for most of the patients (92.9%), the majority of whom (76.3%) were referred to an allergist. More than half of these patients (63.6%) had a documented allergy follow-up, which identified a causative allergen in 53.3% of cases. No statistically significant differences were recorded prior to and after the intervention regarding management of anaphylaxis. CONCLUSIONS: This nationwide study highlighted the necessity of further improvement in terms of anaphylaxis treatment and secondary prevention measures. This presupposes appropriate education and training of healthcare professionals, thus contributing to proper and comprehensive care of the pediatric population.


Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis , Epinephrine , Humans , Anaphylaxis/epidemiology , Anaphylaxis/drug therapy , Anaphylaxis/therapy , Anaphylaxis/diagnosis , Greece/epidemiology , Child , Male , Female , Epinephrine/administration & dosage , Epinephrine/therapeutic use , Child, Preschool , Adolescent , Infant , Surveys and Questionnaires , Histamine Antagonists/therapeutic use , Histamine Antagonists/administration & dosage , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/administration & dosage , Injections, Intramuscular
13.
J Chromatogr A ; 1727: 464989, 2024 Jul 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38763085

ABSTRACT

Ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography coupled with high-field quadrupole Orbitrap high resolution mass spectrometry was used for the separation and determination of 20 antihistamines, and a dispersive micro solid-phase extraction procedure using high-performance absorbing material was developed as a sample preparation strategy for extracting 20 antihistamines from milk. Instrument conditions and key parameters influencing extraction efficiency were investigated to obtain an optimized method. The limit of detection for 20 antihistamines in milk using this method is 0.05 µg/L to 1.0 µg/L. Recoveries are between 80.7 % and 108.3 %, and the relative standard deviation is less than 15 %. It is suitable for confirmatory monitoring and quantitative analysis of 20 antihistamines in milk. The results show that antihistamines in milk may be noteworthy issues for human health and environmental pollution.


Subject(s)
Histamine Antagonists , Limit of Detection , Milk , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid/methods , Milk/chemistry , Animals , Histamine Antagonists/analysis , Histamine Antagonists/isolation & purification , Solid Phase Microextraction/methods , Mass Spectrometry/methods , Cattle , Reproducibility of Results
14.
Adv Exp Med Biol ; 1447: 191-207, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38724794

ABSTRACT

Atopic dermatitis has a substantial impact on sleep, appearance, psychological well-being, and other qualities of life. The visual appearance of lichenification, cheilitis, hyperpigmentation, ichthyosis, and erythema can be socially stigmatizing, and treatment of these symptoms is challenging. In managing pruritus in patients, practitioners should assess and document pruritus through questionnaires at each routine visit. Initially, practitioners should advise patients to employ nonpharmaceutical treatments such as emollients with wet wraps, elimination of triggers, changing scratching habits, and psychological interventions. If these methods of treatment are not successful or if the disease presentation is severe, pharmacological therapies should be employed. This chapter describes the therapeutic ladder for pruritus in atopic dermatitis and discusses each treatment modality in further detail for practitioners to advise their patients.First-line topical pharmaceutical agents include topical glucocorticoids and topical calcineurin inhibitors. Second-line topical agents include coal tar, menthol, capsaicin, or doxepin. After the use of topical agents has been exhausted, primary systemic agents can be applied. These include sedating antihistamines, nonsedating antihistamines, oral glucocorticoids, or cyclosporine A. Finally, neuromodulating or immunomodulating agents can be attempted, including SSRI/SNRIs, TCAs, immunosuppressants, neural modulators, and opioid receptor modulators. Outside of pharmacological treatments, phototherapy has been shown to provide a dramatic improvement of pruritus in atopic dermatitis and can be used at any stage of treatment including as a first-line agent.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Atopic , Pruritus , Humans , Antipruritics/therapeutic use , Calcineurin Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Dermatitis, Atopic/therapy , Dermatitis, Atopic/complications , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Histamine Antagonists/therapeutic use , Phototherapy/methods , Pruritus/therapy , Pruritus/etiology , Pruritus/physiopathology , Pruritus/drug therapy
15.
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban ; 49(2): 175-181, 2024 Feb 28.
Article in English, Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38755713

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Chronic urticaria presents a chronic process of recurrent attacks, and its first-line treatment is second-generation antihistamine with limited treatment options. The efficacy of antihistamine varies among individuals and cannot meet the needs of all patients. This study aims to explore the clinical efficacy and safety of Zhiyang Xiaozhen granules combined with antihistamine in the treatment of chronic urticaria patients. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of patients with chronic urticaria who visited the Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from April 2020 to March 2021. The patients who received conventional second-generation antihistamine treatment were selected as a control group, while the patients who received combined treatment with Zhiyang Xiaozhen granules on the basis of conventional second-generation antihistamine treatment were selected as an observation group. The differences in the Weekly Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7) and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) between the 2 groups before and 4 weeks after treatment were compared. The Symptom Score Reduce Index (SSRI) was used to evaluate and compare the efficacy of the 2 treatment regimens. RESULTS: After 4 weeks of treatment, the UAS7 levels in both groups were significantly reduced (P=0.001 and P<0.001, respectively). The effective rates of the control group and the observation group were 61.11% and 59.38%, respectively when converting UAS7 to SSRI for efficacy evaluation, and there was no statistically significant difference in efficacy between the 2 groups (P>0.05); however, when converting DLQI to SSRI for efficacy evaluation, the effective rates of the control group and the observation group were 33.33% and 46.88%, respectively, and the difference in efficacy between the 2 groups was statistically significant (P<0.001). There were 3 patients with adverse drug reactions related to drowsiness in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of Zhiyang Xiaozhen granules and second-generation antihistamine can effectively improve disease activity in patients with chronic urticaria, and the improvement in quality of life is better than that with the second-generation antihistamine alone.


Subject(s)
Chronic Urticaria , Drugs, Chinese Herbal , Quality of Life , Humans , Chronic Urticaria/drug therapy , Drugs, Chinese Herbal/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Female , Male , Treatment Outcome , Drug Therapy, Combination , Histamine Antagonists/therapeutic use , Adult
16.
Luminescence ; 39(5): e4766, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38785095

ABSTRACT

In this work, two validated approaches were used for estimating hydroxyzine HCl for the first time using resonance Rayleigh scattering (RRS) and spectrofluorimetric techniques. The suggested approaches relied on forming an association complex between hydroxyzine HCl and 2,4,5,7-tetraiodofluorescein (erythrosin B) reagent in an acidic media. The quenching in the fluorescence intensity of 2,4,5,7-tetraiodofluorescein by hydroxyzine at 551.5 nm (excitation = 527.5 nm) was used for determining the studied drug by the spectrofluorimetric technique. The RRS approach is based on amplifying the RRS spectrum at 348 nm upon the interaction of hydroxyzine HCl with 2,4,5,7-tetraiodofluorescein. The spectrofluorimetric methodology and the RRS methodology produced linear results within ranges of 0.15-1.5 µg ml-1 and 0.1-1.2 µg ml-1, respectively. LOD values for these methods were determined to be 0.047 µg ml-1 and 0.033 µg ml-1, respectively. The content of hydroxyzine HCl in its pharmaceutical tablet was estimated using the developed procedures with acceptable recoveries. Additionally, the application of four greenness and whiteness algorithms shows that they are superior to the previously reported method in terms of sustainability, economics, analytical performance, and practicality.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Hydroxyzine , Spectrometry, Fluorescence , Hydroxyzine/analysis , Hydroxyzine/chemistry , Histamine Antagonists/analysis , Histamine Antagonists/chemistry , Scattering, Radiation , Erythrosine/chemistry , Erythrosine/analysis
17.
Med Clin North Am ; 108(4): 609-628, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38816106

ABSTRACT

Allergic rhinitis is a common ailment in primary and acute care settings. Diagnosis is clinical, by means of history and physical examination. Referral to an allergist is considered when symptoms are difficult to manage and/or confirmation by means of further testing is desired. Management of allergic rhinitis should not be considered trivial, as multiple secondary effects can present as the course progresses. Several treatment modalities exist but should begin with glucocorticoid nasal sprays and systemic second- or third-generation antihistamines.


Subject(s)
Rhinitis, Allergic , Humans , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Glucocorticoids/administration & dosage , Histamine Antagonists/therapeutic use , Rhinitis, Allergic/diagnosis , Rhinitis, Allergic/therapy , Rhinitis, Allergic/drug therapy
18.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract ; 12(7): 1879-1889.e8, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38642709

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Short courses of adjunctive systemic corticosteroids are commonly used to treat acute urticaria and chronic urticaria flares (both with and without mast cell-mediated angioedema), but their benefits and harms are unclear. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of treating acute urticaria or chronic urticaria flares with versus without systemic corticosteroids. METHODS: We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CNKI, VIP, Wanfang, and CBM databases from inception to July 8, 2023, for randomized controlled trials of treating urticaria with versus without systemic corticosteroids. Paired reviewers independently screened records, extracted data, and appraised risk of bias with the Cochrane 2.0 tool. We performed random-effects meta-analyses of urticaria activity, itch severity, and adverse events. We assessed certainty of the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach. RESULTS: We identified 12 randomized trials enrolling 944 patients. For patients with low or moderate probability (17.5%-64%) to improve with antihistamines alone, add-on systemic corticosteroids likely improve urticaria activity by a 14% to 15% absolute difference (odds ratio [OR], 2.17, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.43-3.31; number needed to treat [NNT], 7; moderate certainty). Among patients with a high chance (95.8%) for urticaria to improve with antihistamines alone, add-on systemic corticosteroids likely improved urticaria activity by a 2.2% absolute difference (NNT, 45; moderate certainty). Corticosteroids may improve itch severity (OR, 2.44; 95% CI: 0.87-6.83; risk difference, 9%; NNT, 11; low certainty). Systemic corticosteroids also likely increase adverse events (OR, 2.76; 95% CI: 1.00-7.62; risk difference, 15%; number needed to harm, 9; moderate certainty). CONCLUSIONS: Systemic corticosteroids for acute urticaria or chronic urticaria exacerbations likely improve urticaria, depending on antihistamine responsiveness, but also likely increase adverse effects in approximately 15% more.


Subject(s)
Adrenal Cortex Hormones , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Urticaria , Humans , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Urticaria/drug therapy , Treatment Outcome , Histamine Antagonists/therapeutic use , Chronic Urticaria/drug therapy , Drug Therapy, Combination
19.
Rev Med Suisse ; 20(868): 711-719, 2024 Apr 03.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38568065

ABSTRACT

Histamine is responsible for many processes mediated by different receptors expressed on a variety of cells. The discovery of the first H1 antihistamines in the 1940s led to the development of numerous H1 and H2 antagonists with a broad application in many indications. The recent identification of two new histamine receptors (H3, H4) in the 1980s and 2000s led to the market authorization in Switzerland of new drugs since 2018. The purpose of this review is to provide a brief overview of the physiology of histamine, the recent development of new compounds in this field, antihistamine drug indications and relevant side effects.


L'histamine possède de nombreuses propriétés physiologiques, tant centrales que périphériques, via son action sur différents récepteurs. La découverte des premiers antihistaminiques H1 dans les années 1940 stimula le développement de nombreux autres antagonistes H1, puis H2, utilisés dans diverses spécialités médicales. L'identification plus récente de deux récepteurs à l'histamine (H3, H4) dans les années 1980 et 2000 relança le développement de nouveaux composés avec, en Suisse, une première autorisation de mise sur le marché en 2018. L'objectif de cet article de revue est de présenter brièvement la physiologie de l'histamine, l'histoire du développement des antihistaminiques, leurs utilisations actuelles, ainsi que leurs effets indésirables notables.


Subject(s)
Histamine Antagonists , Histamine , Humans , Histamine Antagonists/adverse effects , Narration , Switzerland
20.
Bioorg Chem ; 147: 107387, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38643561

ABSTRACT

Histamine 4 receptor (H4R), the most recently identified subtype of histamine receptor, primarily induces inflammatory reactions upon activation. Several H4R antagonists have been developed for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and atopic dermatitis (AD), but their use has been limited by adverse side effects, such as a short half-life and toxicity. Natural products, as an important source of anti-inflammatory agents, offer minimal side effects and reduced toxicity. This work aimed to identify novel H4R antagonists from natural products. An H4R target-pathway model deconvoluted downstream Gi and MAPK signaling pathways was established utilizing cellular label-free integrative pharmacology (CLIP), on which 148 natural products were screened. Cryptotanshinone was identified as selective H4R antagonist, with an IC50 value of 11.68 ± 1.30 µM, which was verified with Fluorescence Imaging Plate Reader (FLIPR) and Cellular Thermal Shift (CTS) assays. The kinetic binding profile revealed the noncompetitive antagonistic property of cryptotanshinone. Two allosteric binding sites of H4R were predicted using SiteMap, Fpocket and CavityPlus. Subsequent molecular docking and dynamics simulation indicated that cryptotanshinone interacts with H4R at a pocket formed by the outward interfaces between TM3/4/5, potentially representing a new allosteric binding site for H4R. Overall, this study introduced cryptotanshinone as a novel H4R antagonist, offering promise as a new hit for drug design of H4R antagonist. Additionally, this study provided a novel screening model for the discovery of H4R antagonists.


Subject(s)
Biological Products , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Discovery , Receptors, Histamine H4 , Humans , Biological Products/chemistry , Biological Products/pharmacology , Receptors, Histamine H4/antagonists & inhibitors , Receptors, Histamine H4/metabolism , Structure-Activity Relationship , Molecular Structure , Phenanthrenes/pharmacology , Phenanthrenes/chemistry , Histamine Antagonists/pharmacology , Histamine Antagonists/chemistry , Molecular Docking Simulation , Phenotype
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...