Derived Time in Range and Other Metrics of Poor Glycemic Control Associated With Adverse Hospital Outcomes in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus Admitted to Non-ICU Wards at a Tertiary-Level Hospital in Colombia: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Aim: This study is aimed at assessing the prevalence of poor glycemic control using different metrics and its association with in-hospital adverse outcomes. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in diabetic patients admitted to a third-level hospital in Colombia between January and July 2022. Poor glycemic control was determined using capillary glucose metrics, including mean glucose values outside the target range, derived time in range (dTIR) (100-180 mg/dL) < 70%, coefficient of variation (CV > 36%), and hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dL). Multiple regression models were adjusted for hospital outcomes based on glycemic control, as well as other sociodemographic and clinical covariates. Results: A total of 330 Hispanic patients were included. A total of 27.6% had mean glucose measurements outside the target range, 33% had a high CV, 64.8% had low dTIR, and 28.8% experienced hypoglycemia. The in-hospital mortality rate was 8.8%. An admission HbA1c level greater than 7% was linked to an increased mortality risk (p = 0.016), as well as a higher average of glucometer readings (186 mg/dL vs. 143 mg/dL; p < 0.001). A lower average of dTIR (41.0% vs. 60.0%; p < 0.001) was also associated with a higher mortality risk. Glycemic variability was correlated with an increased risk of mortality, hypoglycemia, delirium, and length of hospital stay (LOS). Conclusion: A significant number of hospitalized diabetic patients exhibit poor glycemic control, which has been found to be associated with adverse outcomes, including increased mortality. Metrics like dTIR and glycemic variability should be considered as targets for glycemic control, highlighting the need for enhanced management strategies.

The association between acute kidney injury and dysglycaemia in critically ill patients with and without diabetes mellitus: a retrospective single-center study.

BACKGROUND: Critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) often experience dysglycaemia. However, studies investigating the link between acute kidney injury (AKI) and dysglycaemia, especially in those with and without diabetes mellitus (DM), are limited. METHODS: We used the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database to investigate the association between AKI within 7 days of admission and subsequent dysglycaemia. The primary outcome was the occurrence of dysglycaemia (both hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia) after 7 days of ICU admission. Logistic regression analyzed the relationship between AKI and dysglycaemia, while a Cox proportional hazards model estimated the long-term mortality risk linked to the AKI combined with dysglycaemia. RESULTS: A cohort of 20,008 critically ill patients were included. The AKI group demonstrated a higher prevalence of dysglycaemia, compared to the non-AKI group. AKI patients had an increased risk of dysglycaemia (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.41-1.65), hypoglycemia (aOR 1.56, 95% CI 1.41-1.73), and hyperglycemia (aOR 1.53, 95% CI 1.41-1.66). In subgroup analysis, compared to DM patients, AKI showed higher risk of dysglycaemia in non-DM patients (aOR: 1.93 vs. 1.33, Pint<0.01). Additionally, the AKI with dysglycaemia group exhibited a higher risk of long-term mortality compared to the non-AKI without dysglycaemia group. Dysglycaemia also mediated the relationship between AKI and long-term mortality. CONCLUSION: AKI was associated with a higher risk of dysglycaemia, especially in non-DM patients, and the combination of AKI and dysglycaemia was linked to higher long-term mortality. Further research is needed to develop optimal glycemic control strategies for AKI patients.

Characteristics of Nocturnal Hypoglycaemic Events and Their Impact on Glycaemia.

BACKGROUND: Nocturnal hypoglycaemia is a burden for people with diabetes, particularly when treated with multiple daily injections (MDI) therapy. However, the characteristics of nocturnal hypoglycaemic events in this patient group are only poorly described in the literature. METHOD: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data from 185 study participants with type 1 diabetes using MDI therapy were collected under everyday conditions for up to 13 weeks. Hypoglycaemic events were identified as episodes of consecutive CGM readings <70 mg/dl or <54 mg/dl for at least 15 minutes. Subsequently, the time <54 mg/dl (TB54), time below range (TBR), time in range (TIR), time above range (TAR), glucose coefficient of variation (CV), and incidence of hypoglycaemic events were calculated for diurnal and nocturnal periods. Furthermore, the effect of nocturnal hypoglycaemic events on glucose levels the following day was assessed. RESULTS: The incidence of hypoglycaemic events <70 mg/dl was significantly lower during the night compared to the day, with 0.8 and 3.8 events per week, respectively, while the TBR, TB54, and incidence of events with CGM readings <54 mg/dl was not significantly different. Nocturnal hypoglycaemic events <70 mg/dl were significantly longer (60 vs 35 minutes) and enveloped by less rapidly changing glucose levels. On days following nights containing hypoglycaemic events, there was a decrease in TAR, mean CGM glucose level and morning glucose levels and an increase in TB54, TBR, and CV. CONCLUSIONS: The results showed that nocturnal hypoglycaemic events are a common occurrence in persons with type 1 diabetes using MDI with significant differences between the characteristics of nocturnal and diurnal events.

Adverse Effects of Gliptins in Type 2 Diabetics in Morocco.

INTRODUCTION: Gliptins are a relatively recent class of oral antidiabetic agents used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. The aim of this study is to identify the adverse effects of gliptins in patients with type 2 diabetes, compare the tolerability of these drugs with data from the literature, and determine patients' behavior in the face of these adverse effects with a view to optimizing their management. METHODS: Our study is cross-sectional, descriptive, and analytical, involving 100 patients aged over 20 years, followed at the Endocrinology Department of the Military Hospital Mohammed V. RESULTS: The average age of the patients was 63 years, with a sex ratio F/H of 1.13. The median age of diabetes in the patients was 13 years, with an average blood glucose level of 1.64 and an average hemoglobin A1c of 8.26. The comorbidities were 30% cardiovascular disease, 25% hypertension, and 14% dyslipidemia, and 30% of patients had no comorbidities. Forth-six percent of patients reported adverse events and 54% did not report any adverse event. Twenty-eight percent of the adverse events were gastrointestinal, 18% skin disorders, 14% urinary tract infections, 12% hypoglycemia, 12% nervous system disorders, 8% airway infections, and 8% general disorders. CONCLUSION: This study shows that gliptins remain a safe option as the side effects seem fairly well tolerated by patients. Adverse events may impact patient compliance and pose a problem of adherence to treatment. Thus, it would be advantageous to develop therapeutic education for diabetic patients to detect and manage adverse effects.

Résumé Introduction:Les gliptines sont une classe relativement récente d'antidiabétiques oraux utilisés dans le traitement du diabète de type 2. Le but de cette étude est d'identifier les effets indésirables des gliptines chez les patients diabétiques de type 2, de comparer la tolérance de ces médicaments avec les données de la littérature et de déterminer le comportement des patients face à ces effets indésirables afin d'optimiser leur prise en charge.Méthodes:Notre étude est transversale, descriptive et analytique, portant sur 100 patients âgés de plus de 20 ans, suivis au service d'endocrinologie de l'hôpital militaire Mohammed V.Résultats:L'âge moyen des patients était de 63 ans, avec un sex-ratio F/H de 1,13. L'âge médian d'apparition du diabète chez les patients était de 13 ans, avec une glycémie moyenne de 1,64 et une hémoglobine A1c moyenne de 8,26%. Les comorbidités étaient les suivantes: 30 % de maladies cardiovasculaires, 25 % d'hypertension et 14 % de dyslipidémie; 30 % des patients n'avaient aucune comorbidité. Quarante-six pour cent des patients ont signalé des effets indésirables et 54 % n'ont signalé aucun effet indésirable. Vingt-huit pour cent des effets indésirables étaient d'ordre gastro-intestinal, 18 % des troubles cutanés, 14 % des infections urinaires, 12 % des hypoglycémies, 12 % des troubles du système nerveux, 8 % des infections des voies respiratoires et 8 % des troubles généraux.Conclusion:Cette étude montre que les gliptines restent une option sûre car les effets secondaires semblent assez bien tolérés par les patients. Les effets indésirables peuvent avoir un impact sur la compliance des patients et poser un problème d'adhésion au traitement. Ainsi, il serait avantageux de développer l'éducation thérapeutique des patients diabétiques pour détecter et gérer les effets indésirables.

First year national Swedish paediatric Hba1c data are at the level of several intervention studies: Results from a Swedish nationwide diabetes register study.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: To study the progression of HbA1c after diagnosis of type 1 diabetes in children and adolescents during 2010-2019 with emphasis on HbA1c nadir 3-6 months after onset. METHODS: Partial funding was secured for this study. The Swedish paediatric diabetes quality register SWEDIABKIDS has >95 % coverage of type 1 diabetes up to 18 years. A mixed model for repeated measurements was used to estimate differences in HbA1c between onset year periods. RESULTS: We followed 6,891 patients over two years from onset (48,292 HbA1c values). We found a gradual decrease in mean HbA1c 24 months after onset from 56.0 mmol/mol (7.28 %) in 2010/11 to 50.5 mmol/mol (6.77 %) in 2018/19, which is at the level of several recent intervention studies. The initial drop in HbA1c from onset until 3 and 6 months has become more pronounced in recent years. There was a significant positive correlation between HbA1c at 3 and 6 months with 12, 18 and 24 months. Percentage of severe hypoglycaemic coma was higher (5.1 % vs 3.4 %; p = 0.023) in 2010/2011 than 2018/2019, but the absolute risk of ketoacidosis was essentially unchanged, (1.5 % to 0.8 %, p = 0.110) CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: There was a continuous decrease in HbA1c over the study period 2010-2019, which coincides in time with an increased use of diabetes technology and lowering the HbA1c target to 48 mmol/mol (6.5 %). The decrease in 2-year HbA1c was preceded by a lower HbA1c nadir, which may set the trajectories for coming HbA1c and be a modifiable factor for a long-term improvement in metabolic control.

Risk factors for neonatal hypoglycemia: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This Study aims to investigate the risk factors of hypoglycemia in neonates through meta-analysis. METHOD: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, and Web of science databases were searched for case-control studies on risk factors for neonatal hypoglycemia. The search was done up to 1st October 2023 and Stata 15.0 was used for data analysis. RESULTS: A total of 12 published studies were included, including 991 neonates in the hypoglycemic group and 4388 neonates in the non-hypoglycemic group. Meta-analysis results suggested caesarean section [OR = 1.90 95%CI (1.23, 2.92)], small gestational age[OR = 2.88, 95%CI (1.59, 5.20)], gestational diabetes [OR = 1.65, 95%CI (1.11, 2.46)], gestational hypertension[OR = 2,79, 95%CI (1.78, 4.35)] and respiratory distress syndrome[OR = 5.33, 95%CI (2.22, 12.84)] were risk factors for neonatal hypoglycemia. CONCLUSION: Based on the current study, we found that caesarean section, small gestational age, gestational diabetes, gestational hypertension, respiratory distress syndrome are risk factors for neonatal hypoglycemia. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023472974.

Influence of Shortened Fasting Time on Perioperative Outcomes in Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Prolonged preoperative fasting can cause hypoglycemia, dehydration, hypotension, and irritability, especially in children. Multimodal protocols such as the Enhanced Recovery After Operation (ERAS) and the Accelerated Full Postoperative Recovery (ACERTO, Aceleração da Recuperação Total Pós-Operatória) recommend a shortened fasting period. The aim of this study is to evaluate the association between shortened preoperative fasting and perioperative outcomes in pediatric patients. METHODS: This study is a systematic review of the literature. The inclusion criteria were original studies published between January 2017-November 2022 that used shortened preoperative fasting protocols validated in patients aged 0-17 years and that evaluated the association of this practice with perioperative outcomes. The studies were obtained from the Latin American and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences (LILACS), National Library of Medicine and National Institutes of Health (PubMed) and Science Direct databases. RESULTS: A total of 6064 articles were obtained, of which eight were considered eligible. The results showed that shortened preoperative fast is safe in children and adolescents. The main benefits of this practice were higher preoperative blood glucose, no episodes of preoperative hypoglycemia, lower incidence of nausea, and minor complaints of crying. CONCLUSIONS: Shortening the fasting time with high-carbohydrate drinks between one and 2 h before operation is safe in children and adolescents, being associated with better metabolic and emotional responses in the perioperative period. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Transitioning to Insulin Analogs in Tunisian Children with Type 1 Diabetes: Efficacy and Safety.

INTRODUCTION: there is a lack of research evaluating the impact of therapeutic switching from human insulin to analogues, particularly in paediatric populations from low- and middle-income countries. AIM: The study aimed to retrospectively assess the effectiveness and safety of transitioning from human insulin to insulin analogs in Tunisian children with diabetes. METHODS: This retrospective descriptive study included children with type 1 diabetes who changed their insulin therapy protocol after at least one year of treatment with human insulin. Clinical, therapeutic, and glycaemic homeostasis parameters were assessed following the transition from human insulin (NPH + rapid-acting insulin) to the Basal-Bolus insulin analog- protocol. RESULTS: The study included 60 patients. Following the switch, all patients showed a significant reduction in mean fasting blood glucose levels (11.11 mmol/l vs. 8.62 mmol/l; p=0.024). Glycated haemoglobin A1C levels decreased notably in children who adhered to their diet (from 9.93% to 8.38%; p=0.06) and/or engaged in regular physical activity (from 10.40% to 8.61%; p=0.043). The average number of hypoglycemic events per year decreased from 4.03 events/year to 2.36 events/year (p=0.006), along with a decrease in the rate of patients hospitalized for acid-ketotic decompensation (from 27% to 10%; p=0.001). Financial constraints led to 82% of patients reusing microfine needles ≥2 times per day, and 12% were compelled to revert to the initial insulin therapy protocol due to a lack of access to self-financed microfine needles or discontinued social coverage. CONCLUSIONS: Although insulin analogues offer clear benefits, their use poses challenges as a therapeutic choice for children with diabetes in low- to middle-income countries. These challenges hinder the achievement of optimal glycemic control goals.

Prevalence and predictors of hypoglycemia in older outpatients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of type 2 diabetes (DM) has been increasing globally, particularly among older adults who are more susceptible to DM-related complications. Elderly individuals with diabetes are at higher risk of developing hypoglycemia compared with younger diabetes patients. Hypoglycemia in elderly patients can result in serious consequences such as cognitive changes, increased risk of falls, heart and other vascular problems, and even high mortality rate. OBJECTIVE: To assess prevalence, and factors associated with hypoglycemia events among geriatric outpatients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: The study was conducted at King Abdullah University Hospital (KAUH) at the outpatient diabetes clinic from October 1st, 2022 to August 1st, 2023. Variables such as socio-demographics, medication history, and comorbidities were obtained using electronic medical records. The prevalence of hypoglycemia was determined through patient interviews during their clinic visit. Patients were prospectively monitored for hospital admissions, emergency department visits, and mortality using electronic medical records over a three-month follow-up period. Logistic regression models were conducted to identify factors associated with hypoglycemia and hospital admissions/ emergency visits. Ethical Approval (Reference # 53/151/2022) was obtained on 19/9/2022. RESULTS: Electronic medical charts of 640 patients who have type 2 diabetes mellitus and age ≥ 60 years were evaluated. The mean age ± SD was 67.19 (± 5.69) years. Hypoglycemia incidents with different severity levels were prevalent in 21.7% (n = 139) of the patients. Insulin administration was significantly associated with more hypoglycemic events compared to other antidiabetic medication. Patients with liver diseases had a significantly higher risk of hypoglycemia, with odds 7.43 times higher than patients without liver diseases. Patients with dyslipidemia also had a higher risk of hypoglycemia (odd ratio = 1.87). Regression analysis revealed that hypoglycemia and educational level were significant predictors for hospital admission and emergency department (ER) visits. Hypoglycemia was a positive predictor, meaning it increased the odds of these outcomes, while having a college degree or higher was associated with reduced odds of hospital admission and ER visits. CONCLUSION: Current study identified a considerable prevalence of hypoglycemia among older patients with type 2 diabetes, particularly, among those with concurrent liver diseases and dyslipidemia. Furthermore, hypoglycemia was associated with an increased rate of emergency department visits and hospital admissions by 2 folds in this population.

Real-world safety profile of once-weekly semaglutide in people with type 2 diabetes: Analysis of pooled data from the SemaglUtide Real-world Evidence (SURE) programme.

AIM: To investigate, through post hoc analysis of nine studies from the SemaglUtide Real-world Evidence (SURE) programme, the safety of once-weekly (OW) semaglutide in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and in subpopulations in routine clinical practice, complementing findings from the phase 3 randomized clinical trial (RCT) SUSTAIN programme. METHODS: The SURE studies had a duration of ~30 weeks and included adults with diagnosed T2D treated with OW semaglutide. Safety information, including hypoglycaemic events, were collected and analysed for the total study population and for patient subgroups based on baseline patient characteristics, baseline co-medication and prescriber specialty. RESULTS: Of the total 3505 patients, 24.3% reported adverse events (AEs), with most patients reporting non-serious (22.3%) and mild (17.1%) AEs. AEs mainly belonged to the gastrointestinal disorders system organ class (16.3% of patients). In total, 5.1% of patients reported AEs that led to treatment discontinuation, 0.5% reported serious adverse drug reactions and 0.2% had an AE with a fatal outcome, reported as unrelated to treatment. Overall, 1.1% and 0.1% of patients reported level 2 and 3 hypoglycaemic events, respectively. A higher rate of level 2 hypoglycaemia was observed in patients with baseline microvascular complications treated with insulin versus those on insulin without these complications. CONCLUSIONS: Safety data reported in the real-world SURE studies were generally consistent with observations in phase 3 OW semaglutide RCTs. No new safety concerns were identified, highlighting that OW semaglutide is well tolerated by adults with T2D and in subpopulations in routine clinical practice.

[Association between anthropometric indices with the risk of hypoglycemia in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus].

Almost 90% of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) are obese. Obesity increases the risk of developing DM2 several times. The calculation of anthropometric indices is used to diagnose the severity of obesity, as well as to assess the risk associated with obesity. The aim of the study is to study the relationship between Body Mass Index (BMI), waist circumference to hip circumference ratio (waist-to-hip ratio, WC/HR), Body Roundness Index (BRI) and Visceral Adiposity Index (VAI) with the risk of hypoglycemia in elderly and senile patients with DM2. The study included 122 elderly and senile patients (mean age 71±6,18 years) with DM2. The study participants were divided into 2 groups: patients with cases of hypoglycemia (n=65) and patients without a history of hypoglycemia (n=57). We have found that lower BMI, WC/HR, BRI, and VAI values are significantly associated with an increased risk of hypoglycemia in patients with DM2 of older age groups.

Metformin is associated with reduced risk of mortality and morbidity in burn patients compared to insulin.

PURPOSE: The standard of care for burned patients experiencing hyperglycemia associated with the hypermetabolic response is insulin therapy. Insulin treatment predisposes burn patients to hypoglycemia, which increases morbidity and mortality. Metformin has been suggested as an alternative to insulin therapy for glycemic control in burn patients given its safety profile, but further research is warranted. This study investigated whether metformin use in burn patients is associated with improved glycemic control and morbidity/mortality outcomes compared to insulin use alone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the TriNetX database, we conducted a retrospective study of burned patients who were administered insulin, metformin, or both within one week of injury. Demographic, comorbidity, and burn severity information were collected. Patients were categorized by treatment type, propensity score-matched, and compared for the following outcomes within 3 months: hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia, sepsis, lactic acidosis, and death. Statistical significance was set a priori at p ≤ 0.05. RESULTS: The insulin cohort was at increased risk for all outcomes (all p < 0.0001) compared to the metformin cohort, and an increased risk for sepsis, lactic acidosis, and death (all p ≤ 0.0002) compared to the insulin/metformin combination cohort. When compared to the metformin cohort, the combination cohort was at increased risk for all outcomes (all p ≤ 0.0107) except death. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with metformin after burn is associated with a reduced risk of morbidity and mortality compared to insulin. The combination of insulin and metformin is no more effective in reducing the risk of hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia than insulin alone but is less effective than metformin alone.

An update on the current characteristics and status of care for Muslims with type 2 diabetes fasting during Ramadan: the DAR global survey 2022.

BACKGROUND: Managing diabetes during Ramadan fasting is a challenge due lifestyle changes. We described the characteristics and patterns of care for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) during Ramadan 2020 and 2022. METHODS: Our study included multinational Muslims with T2DM who were during routine consultation. We collected data on demographics, fasting characteristics, and complications. Descriptive statistics, chi-square test, and multiple testing were performed. RESULTS: 12,529 patients participated. Mean age was 55.2 ± 11.8 years; 52.4% were females. Mean diabetes duration was 9.9 ± 7.4 years; 27.7% were with HbA1c >9% (75 mmol/mol) and 70% had complications. Metformin was the most used medication followed by insulin. 85.1% fasted ≥1 day; fasting mean duration was 27.6 ± 5.6 days. Hypoglycemia occurred in 15.5% of whom 11.7% attended emergency department or were hospitalized; this was significantly associated with age and/or duration of diabetes. Hyperglycemia occurred in 14.9% of whom 6.1% attended emergency department or were hospitalized and was also associated with age or duration of diabetes. 74.2% performed SMBG during fasting. 59.2% were educated on Ramadan fasting, with 89.7% receiving it during routine consultation. CONCLUSIONS: Ramadan fasting in T2DM is high. Multidisciplinary approach is required to mitigate complications. Our findings support current recommendations for safe fasting.

The goal of this survey was to describe the characteristics and current ways of care for Muslim patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus fasting during and after Ramadan 2020 and 2022. Most of the participants fasted a minimum of one day during Ramadan (85.1%). Overall, 15.5 and 14.9% reported low blood sugar levels or high blood sugar levels during fasting, respectively. Low blood sugar level was more reported in patients with older age, patients with longer diabetes duration, and women. High blood sugar level was more reported in patients with longer diabetes duration. Educational programs focusing on the risks occurring with fasting and practices that improve control of the disease will raise knowledge and awareness among patients with diabetes. Improving blood sugar control during Ramadan fasting remains a major need for both patients and healthcare providers who should collaborate to reduce the risk of diabetes-related problems.

Long-term efficacy and safety of enavogliflozin in Korean people with type 2 diabetes: A 52-week extension of a Phase 3 randomized controlled trial.

AIMS: To evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of enavogliflozin monotherapy (0.3 mg/day) in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Following a 24-week randomized, double-blind treatment period with enavogliflozin 0.3 mg/day (n = 77) or placebo (n = 69), consenting participants received enavogliflozin 0.3 mg/day for an additional 28 weeks during an open-label extension (OLE) period. The safety and efficacy of enavogliflozin were assessed at Week 52. RESULTS: A total of 37 participants continued enavogliflozin (maintenance group), and 26 participants switched from placebo to enavogliflozin (switch group). No additional adverse drug reactions related to enavogliflozin were observed during the OLE period. At Week 52, glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and fasting plasma glucose were significantly lower than at the baseline, by 0.9% and 24.9 mg/dL, respectively, in the maintenance group (p < 0.0001 for both), and by 0.7% and 18.0 mg/dL, respectively, in the switch group (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.002). The proportions of participants reaching HbA1c 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) at Week 52 were 69.4% in the maintenance group and 65.4% in the switch group. A significant increase in urine glucose-to-creatinine ratio was observed at Week 52, by 84.9 g/g and 67.1 g/g in the maintenance and switch groups, respectively (p < 0.0001 for both). Body weight in both groups decreased significantly (p < 0.0001) from baseline to Week 52, by 3.5 kg and 3.8 kg in the maintenance and switch groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Enavogliflozin 0.3 mg monotherapy provides long-term glycaemic control in T2DM and is safe and well tolerated during a 52-week treatment period.

Efficacy and safety of insulin glargine 300 U/mL in people with type 2 diabetes in China: The INITIATION study.

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) in people with suboptimally controlled type 2 diabetes (T2D) in China. METHODS: INITIATION (NCT05002933) was a prospective, interventional, multicentre, single-arm, phase IV study conducted in China. Individuals with suboptimally controlled T2D who were insulin naïve or switching from another basal insulin (insulin experienced) were included. The primary endpoint was the change in HbA1c from baseline to week 24. Safety assessments included hypoglycaemia and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: In total, 568 participants were enrolled and 562 initiated Gla-300 treatment (189 in the insulin-naïve subgroup; 373 in the insulin-experienced subgroup). At week 24, the mean ± standard error (SE) change in HbA1c from baseline was -0.91% ± 0.05% (-9.9 ± 0.5 mmol/mol; P < .0001). Significant HbA1c reductions were also observed in the insulin-naïve (mean ± SE change: -1.38% ± 0.09% [-15.1 ± 1.0 mmol/mol]) and insulin-experienced (-0.68% ± 0.05% [-7.4 ± 0.5 mmol/mol]) subgroups (both P < .0001). During the 24-week treatment period, the incidence of confirmed hypoglycaemia (plasma glucose ≤ 3.9 mmol/L) was 39.7% for all hypoglycaemia and 13.3% for nocturnal hypoglycaemia; the incidence of severe hypoglycaemia was low (0.5%). Overall, treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were reported in 126 participants (22.4%), with no serious treatment-related TEAEs. CONCLUSIONS: Gla-300 was effective in improving glycaemic control and had a relatively low risk of hypoglycaemia in people with suboptimally controlled T2D who were insulin naïve or switching from another basal insulin in China.

Risk factors at admission of in-hospital dysglycemia, mortality, and readmissions in patients with type 2 diabetes and pneumonia.

AIMS: In-hospital dysglycemia is associated with adverse outcomes. Identifying patients at risk of in-hospital dysglycemia early on admission may improve patient outcomes. METHODS: We analysed 117 inpatients admitted with pneumonia and type 2 diabetes monitored by continuous glucose monitoring. We assessed potential risk factors for in-hospital dysglycemia and adverse clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Time in range (3.9-10.0 mmol/l) decreased by 2.9 %-points [95 % CI 0.7-5.0] per 5 mmol/mol [2.6 %] increase in admission haemoglobin A1c, 16.2 %-points if admission diabetes therapy included insulin therapy [95 % CI 2.9-29.5], and 2.4 %-points [95 % CI 0.3-4.6] per increase in the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) (integer, as a measure of severity and amount of comorbidities). Thirty-day readmission rate increased with an IRR of 1.24 [95 % CI 1.06-1.45] per increase in CCI. In-hospital mortality risk increased with an OR of 1.41 [95 % CI 1.07-1.87] per increase in Early Warning Score (EWS) (integer, as a measure of acute illness) at admission. CONCLUSIONS: Dysglycemia among hospitalised patients with pneumonia and type 2 diabetes was associated with high haemoglobin A1c, insulin treatment before admission, and the amount and severity of comorbidities (i.e., CCI). Thirty-day readmission rate increased with high CCI. The risk of in-hospital mortality increased with the degree of acute illness (i.e., high EWS) at admission. Clinical outcomes were independent of chronic glycemic status, i.e. HbA1c, and in-hospital glycemic status.

Dysglycaemia in Ebola virus disease: a retrospective analysis from the 2018 to 2020 outbreak.

BACKGROUND: Ebola virus disease (EVD) is associated with multisystem organ failure and high mortality. Severe hypoglycaemia is common, life-threatening, and correctable in critically ill patients, but glucose monitoring may be limited in EVD treatment units. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients admitted to EVD treatment units in Butembo and Katwa, Eastern DRC. Glucose measurements were done using a handheld glucometer at the bedside or using the Piccolo xpress Chemistry Analyzer on venous samples. FINDINGS: 384 patients (median age 30 years (interquartile range, IQR, 20-45), 57% female) and 6422 glucose measurements (median 11 per patient, IQR 4-22) were included in the analysis. Severe hypoglycaemia (≤2.2 mmol/L) and hyperglycaemia (>10 mmol/L) were recorded at least once during the ETU admission in 97 (25%) and 225 (59%) patients, respectively. A total of 2004 infusions of glucose-containing intravenous solutions were administered to 302 patients (79%) with a median cumulative dose of 175g (IQR 100-411). The overall case fatality rate was 157/384 (41%) and was 2.2-fold higher (95% CI 1.3-3.8) in patients with severe hypoglycaemia than those without hypoglycaemia (p = 0.0042). In a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model, periods of severe hypoglycaemia (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 6.2, 95% CI 3.2-12, p < 0.0001) and moderate hypoglycaemia (aHR 3.0, 95% CI 1.9-4.8, p < 0.0001) were associated with elevated mortality. INTERPRETATION: Hypoglycaemia is common in EVD, requires repeated correction with intravenous dextrose solutions, and is associated with mortality. FUNDING: This study was not supported by any specific funding.

Once-weekly insulin icodec compared with daily basal insulin analogues in type 2 diabetes: Participant-level meta-analysis of the ONWARDS 1-5 trials.

AIM: To perform a participant-level post hoc meta-analysis of Phase 3a trials in type 2 diabetes (T2D) to characterize the hypoglycaemia safety and glycaemic efficacy of once-weekly insulin icodec (icodec). MATERIALS AND METHODS: All ONWARDS 1-5 randomized participants were pooled as overall T2D, insulin-naive, an insulin-experienced subgroups, and by once-daily trial comparator (degludec or glargine U100). The main outcomes included incidence and rates of clinically significant and severe hypoglycaemia. Additional endpoints included change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline and HbA1c target achievement without clinically significant or severe hypoglycaemia. RESULTS: The meta-analysis comprised 3765 participants (1882 icodec vs. 1883 comparators). In the overall T2D pool, clinically significant hypoglycaemia incidence was similar in the icodec group versus the comparator group (17.9% vs. 16.2%, odds ratio [OR] 1.14, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.94, 1.38); however, rates were low but significantly higher in the icodec group (1.15 vs. 1.00 episodes/participant-year of exposure, estimated rate ratio 1.51 [95% CI 1.24, 1.85]). Fewer severe hypoglycaemic episodes occurred with icodec than with comparators (8 vs. 18). A greater reduction in HbA1c occurred with icodec versus comparators, irrespective of subgroup (estimated treatment difference range [-0.10 to -0.29%]; all p < 0.05). Across subgroups, except for the insulin-experienced subgroup, the odds of achieving HbA1c <53 mmol/mol (7.0%) without clinically significant or severe hypoglycaemia were greater with icodec than with comparators (OR range 1.30-1.55; all p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Icodec was associated with a similar incidence but higher rates of clinically significant hypoglycaemia (equating to one additional hypoglycaemic episode every 6 years) and fewer severe hypoglycaemic episodes versus comparators. Our findings also confirmed the greater efficacy of icodec that was demonstrated in the ONWARDS trial programme.

Dual add-on therapy of gemigliptin and dapagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin alone: The SOLUTION 2 study.

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of gemigliptin and dapagliflozin dual add-on therapy (GEMI + DAPA) to metformin in type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients who had inadequate glycaemic control on metformin alone, compared with a single add-on of either gemigliptin (GEMI) or dapagliflozin (DAPA) to metformin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, parallel-group, phase 3 study, 469 T2D patients treated with a stable dose of metformin for 8 weeks or longer were randomized to receive GEMI + DAPA (n = 157) and either GEMI (n = 156) or DAPA (n = 156). The primary endpoint was change in HbA1c levels from baseline at week 24. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics including body mass index and T2D duration were similar among groups. At week 24, the least square mean changes in HbA1c from baseline were -1.34% with GEMI + DAPA, -0.90% with GEMI (difference between GEMI + DAPA vs. GEMI -0.44% [95% confidence interval {CI}: -0.58% to -0.31%], P < .01) and -0.78% with DAPA (difference between GEMI + DAPA vs. DAPA -0.56% [95% CI: -0.69% to -0.42%], P < .01). Both upper CIs were less than 0, demonstrating the superiority of GEMI + DAPA for lowering HbA1c. The rates of responders achieving HbA1c less than 7% and less than 6.5% were greater with GEMI + DAPA (84.9%, 56.6%) than with GEMI (55.3%, 32.2%) and DAPA (49.3%, 15.3%). The incidence rate of adverse events was similar across groups, with low incidence rates of hypoglycaemia, urinary tract infection and genital infection. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the addition of GEMI + DAPA to metformin as triple combination therapy was effective, safe and well-tolerated, especially for T2D patients who experienced poor glycaemic control on metformin alone.

Effects of preprandial versus postprandial nutritional insulin administration in the inpatient setting.

AIMS: Hospitalized patients can have inconsistent nutritional intake due to acute illness, changing diet, or unpredictable meal delivery. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether implementation of a hospital-wide policy shifting nutritional insulin administration from pre-meal to post-meal was associated with changes in glycemic control or length of stay (LOS). METHODS: This retrospective study performed at a community hospital evaluated adult inpatients receiving nutritional insulin across three time periods. pre-intervention, immediate post-intervention, and distant post-intervention. Outcomes included rates of hypoglycemia (glucose ≤ 70 mg/dL), moderate hypoglycemia (< 54 mg/dL), severe hypoglycemia (≤ 40 mg/dL), severe hyperglycemia (≥ 300 mg/dL), daily mean glucose level, and LOS. RESULTS: The number of patient-days analyzed across the cohorts were 1948, 1751, and 3244, respectively. After multivariate adjustment, risk of developing any hypoglycemia and severe hypoglycemia significantly decreased over time (p = 0.001 and p = 0.009, respectively). Daily mean glucose increased over time (194.6 ± 62.5 vs 196.8 ± 65.5 vs 199.3 ± 61.5 mg/dL; p = 0.003), but there were no significant differences among rates of severe hyperglycemia (p = 0.10) or LOS (p = 0.74). CONCLUSIONS: Implementing a hospital-wide shift to postprandial nutritional insulin administration significantly reduced hypoglycemia rates without increasing severe hyperglycemia. This suggests a promising strategy for improving patient safety, but further prospective randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm these findings.