Comparison of Effectiveness of Intraarticular Hyaluronate and Corticosteroid injections in Adhesive Capsulitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder causes inflammation and adhesions in the shoulder joint capsule, leading to pain and limited range of motion (ROM). Intraarticular corticosteroid (CS) and hyaluronic acid (HA) injections are common therapeutic options for adhesive capsulitis, but their comparative effectiveness remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: To provide a robust comparison of the outcomes of HA and CS, we conducted a meta-analysis of relevant previous studies that examined the therapeutic effects of intraarticular HA and CS injections in patients with adhesive capsulitis. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: This meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials compared the effectiveness of intraarticular HA and CS injections. Of the 10,205 articles, 7 met our predetermined criteria and were included in the analysis. RESULTS: Patients who received CS injections demonstrated superior pain reduction and functional improvement at 2-4 weeks after injection to those who received HA injections. Nevertheless, comparable outcomes were observed between the 2 groups at 6 and 12 weeks. The active or passive range of motion of the shoulder joint was not significantly different between patients who received HA injections and those who received CS injections. LIMITATIONS: The meta-analysis included only a small number of studies, and the number of HA injections examined in those studies varied from one to 3 at a time, whereas an CS injection was performed only once in most of the included studies. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of intraarticular HA injection emerges as a commendable therapeutic option for patients with adhesive capsulitis, particularly for those requiring repetitive injections or at risk of developing side effects from injections of CS. Although intraarticular CS injections offer accelerated short-term (2-4 weeks) pain relief and functional improvement, comparable effects were observed within 6 and 12 weeks after intraarticular HA and CS injections.

Comparison of the Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Suprascapular Nerve Blocks and Intraarticular Corticosteroid Injections for Frozen Shoulder: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: The current mainstream treatment for frozen shoulder is a combination of physiotherapy and intraarticular corticosteroid injections (IACIs). Recently, the ultrasound-guided suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) has developed as a notable alternative option to the mainstream treatment. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare ultrasound-guided SSNBs' effectiveness to IACIs' as treatments for frozen shoulder. STUDY DESIGN: This study was conducted as a prospective single-blind, randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, a medical center in Taipei, Taiwan. METHODS: Patients with frozen shoulder (n = 76) were enrolled as participants and allocated to either an SSNB group (n = 38) or an IACI group (n = 38). Both groups received 2 injections of 20 mg of triamcinolone and 3 mL of 1% lidocaine at 2-week intervals and underwent the same physiotherapy protocol for 3 months. The primary outcome measure was the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI). The secondary outcome measures were the Shoulder Disability Questionnaire (SDQ), the active and passive range of motion (ROM) of each patient's affected shoulder, and the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). Evaluations were performed at baseline and at 4 and 12 weeks after starting treatment. RESULTS: Both groups achieved significant improvements in all outcome measures, except the general health subscale of the SF-36 at 4 and 12 weeks after starting treatment. For time and group interaction, the results for the SDQ (P = .047) and SF-36 (bodily pain, P = .025) indicated significant differences that favored IACIs. Additionally, the IACI group achieved more favorable outcomes than did the SSNB group on the SPADI (P = .094) and in ROM (i.e., abduction [P = .190] and external rotation [P = .081]) as well as on 2 subscales of the SF-36: bodily pain (P = .059) and role-emotional (P = .072). LIMITATIONS: Our study is limited by the lack of participant stratification based on the stages of frozen shoulder and the 12-week follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: A combination of ultrasound-guided IACIs and physiotherapy should be attempted first as a frozen shoulder treatment.

The Effectiveness of Alpha-2-Macroglobulin Injections for Osteoarthritis of the Knee.

BACKGROUND: Intra-articular (IA) injections of plateletrich plasma (PRP) have been increasingly used in the nonoperative treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA) but have considerable heterogeneity in both formulation and clinical results. Alpha-2-macroglobulin (A2M) is a large plasma protein found in PRP that inhibits cartilage-degrading enzymes and could be an efficacious OA treatment independently. The purpose of this study was to compare the short-term clinical efficacy of IA injection of A2M-rich PRP concentrate to conventionally prepared PRP and corticosteroids in the management of symptomatic knee OA. METHODS: This double-blinded, randomized, controlled clinical trial was conducted at a single medical center with enrollment from June 2018 to May 2019. Subjects with symptomatic Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade 2 or 3 knee OA were randomized to IA injection with A2M, PRP, or methylprednisolone (MP) and followed for 12 weeks post-injection. Knee pain and function were assessed at pre-treatment baseline and at 6-week and 12-week followup with patient-reported outcome (PRO) surveys including the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Lysholm score, and Tegner score. RESULTS: Seventy-five subjects were enrolled in the trial, of whom 68 (90.7%) completed the 12-week follow-up. The majority of subjects (73%) were female with a mean age of 59 years (range: 37 to 75 years). There were no significant differences in age (p = 0.30), sex (p = 0.44), or KL grade (p = 0.73) between treatment groups. By 12 weeks postinjection, the A2M group showed significant improvement in VAS, WOMAC, KOOS, and Tegner (p < 0.05), the PRP group showed no significant improvement in any PROs (p > 0.05), and the MP group showed significant improvement in Lysholm only (p = 0.01). However, the changes in PRO scores between baseline and 12-week follow-up did not significantly differ between the three groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Alpha-2-macroglobulin IA injection shows comparable efficacy to PRP and corticosteroids in the treatment of mild-to-moderate knee OA. Alpha-2-macroglobulin treatment resulted in modest improvement in knee pain and function at 6-week follow-up, albeit inconsistently across PRO measures and to a similar degree as PRP and corticosteroids. Given its non-superior short-term efficacy compared to established IA injections, as well as its increased cost of preparation, A2M may not be a justifiable option for routine treatment of knee OA.

The biphasic role of the infrapatellar fat pad in osteoarthritis.

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a progressive degenerative disease resulting in joint deterioration. It is a whole organ disease characterized by cartilage degeneration and varying degrees of synovitis, involving pathological changes in all joint tissues, such as cartilage, subchondral bone, ligaments, meniscus, synovium, and infrapatellar fat pad (IPFP). IPFP is the largest adipose tissue structure in the knee joint and is composed of fat cells, immune cells and blood vessels. Moreover, IPFP is located close to the cartilage and bone surface so that it may reduce the impact of loading and absorb forces generated through the knee joint, and may have a protective role in joint health. IPFP has been shown to release various cytokines and adipokines that play pro-inflammatory and pro-catabolic roles in cartilage, promoting OA progression. Intra-articular injections of IPFP-derived mesenchymal stem cells and exosomes have been shown to reduce pain and prevent OA progression in patients with knee OA. Previous studies have shown that IPFP has a biphasic effect on OA progression. This article reviews the latest research progress of IPFP, discusses the role and mechanism of IPFP in OA, provide new intervention strategies for the treatment of OA. This article will also discuss the handling of IPFP during the procedure of total knee arthroplasty.

Effectiveness of intra-articular analgesia in reducing postoperative pain after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.

During the first postoperative days following minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion (MISJF), patients often report serious pain, which contributes to high utilization of painkillers and prevention of early mobilization. This prospective, double-blind randomized controlled trial investigates the effectiveness of intraoperative SIJ infiltration with bupivacaine 0.50% versus placebo (NaCl 0.9%) in 42 patients in reducing postoperative pain after MISJF. The primary outcome was difference in pain between bupivacaine and placebo groups, assessed as fixed factor in a linear mixed model. Secondary outcomes were opioid consumption, patient satisfaction, adverse events, and length of hospital stay. We found that SIJ infiltration with bupivacaine did not affect postoperative pain scores in comparison with placebo, neither as group-effect (p = 0.68), nor dependent on time (group*time: p = 0.87). None of the secondary outcome parameters were affected in the postoperative period in comparison with placebo, including opioid consumption (p = 0.81). To conclude, intra-articular infiltration of the SIJ with bupivacaine at the end of MISJF surgery is not effective in reducing postoperative pain. Hence, we do not recommend routine use of intraoperative SIJ infiltration with analgesia in MISJF.

Comparing the Effects of Corticosteroid Injections and Resistance Exercise on Knee Osteoarthritis Patients: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: To evaluate research on the effectiveness of intra-articular corticosteroids injections compared with resistance exercise on pain, stiffness, and function among patients diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis. METHODS: Using the PRISMA guidelines, the authors performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in PubMed and EBSCOhost published between January 2012 and October 2022. The authors used keywords to identify studies. After screening the abstracts, reviewers used two screening tools to evaluate for validity and strength of each RCT. Full text of selected articles was critically appraised and narrative analysis was performed. The outcome used to determine effectiveness of the interventions was the Western Ontario McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). RESULTS: Of the 69,056 articles identified during the preliminary search, 8 met the inclusion criteria for use in the study. Three studies involved resistance exercise, and 5 studies involved corticosteroids. Of the 3 resistance studies, 2 had significant changes in WOMAC scores. Of the 5 studies on corticosteroid injections, 4 had significant changes in WOMAC scores. CONCLUSION: Evidence from this review suggests that there is a significant improvement in WOMAC scores for both intervention groups. Although an analysis of research evidence suggests that there is no superior treatment for knee osteoarthritis between corticosteroid injections and resistance exercise, it is important to consider contextual and environmental factors before recommending either treatment.

[Blood Products and Stem Cells in Osteoarthritis Therapy]. / Blutprodukte und Stammzellen in der Arthrosetherapie.

The principle of regenerative medicine in the treatment of osteoarthritis pursues a functional restoration of cartilage tissue instead of just repairing cartilage defects. The use of blood products is intended to inhibit chronic inflammatory processes and promote tissue regeneration. Intraarticular injection of autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is a prominent procedure. Clinical evidence supports PRP injection over hyaluronic acid or glucocorticoid injection. Comparability of studies is difficult due to missing standardisation of production procedures, dosing and donor variability. In particular, whether presence of residual leukocytes is required or should be avoided is an open debate. In contrast, stem cell therapies in osteoarthritis therapy are often based on mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) from adipose tissue or bone marrow aspirate. Different sources of MSC might render the cells more suitable for application in a given context. Nevertheless, it became evident that their secretome rather than the cells themselves are responsible for observed regenerative processes. Research on the mechanisms of action have focused on growth factors. However, an overlooked component of blood products called extracellular vesicles (EV) came to the center of attention, which are also released by MSC as intercellular signal carriers. EV cargo molecules such as miRNAs open up new dimensions in the investigation and explanation of clinically observed anti-inflammatory and regenerative effects.

Hyaluronic Acid/Platelet-Rich Plasma Mixture Improves Temporomandibular Joint Biomechanics: A Systematic Review.

Hyaluronic acid (HA) is the main component of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) synovial fluid. Arthritis in temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) disrupts HA metabolism, resulting in shorter polymeric chain predominance and increased friction. Intra-articular injections of HA supplement the larger molecules of this glycosaminoglycan, and the platelet-rich plasma (PRP) delivered in this way releases growth factors, suppressing inflammation. This PRISMA-compliant PROSPERO-registered (CRD42024564382) systematic review aimed to assess the validity of mixing HA with PRP in the injectable treatment of TMJ disorders. We searched the medical literature for eligible randomized clinical trials using BASE, Google Scholar, PubMed and Scopus engines on 9 May 2024, with no time frame limit. Selected reports were assessed for risk of bias using the Cochrane RoB2 tool. Numerical data were collected on articular pain and mandibular mobility. We provided mean differences from baseline and between study and control groups at each observation point. The efficacy of TMD treatment with HA/PRP versus HA or PRP alone was assessed meta-analytically. Of 171 identified records, we selected 6 studies. In the 6-month follow-up, the mean advantage of PRP supplementation with HA was 2.52 (SE = 2.44; d = 0.83) mm and the benefit of adding PRP to HA was 1.47 (SE = 2.68; d = 0.34) mm in mandibular abduction. The pain-improvement scores were -1.33 (SE = 1.02; d = -1.05) and -1.18 (SE = 0.92; d = 0.80), respectively. Presumably, the HA/PRP range of therapeutic efficiency includes cases non-respondent to HA or PRP alone.

Is microfracture sufficient for high-tibial osteotomy, or should intra-articular hyaluronic acid and oral glucosamine-chondroitin be used as additional treatments?

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the effects of microfracture (MF) versus intra-articular hyaluronic acid (HA) + oral glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate (GC) in addition to MF in patients with osteoarthritic knees who underwent medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO) after an average follow-up of five years. METHODS: The study was designed retrospectively and included patients who underwent MOWHTO due to gonarthrosis, the MF method performed on these patients, and HA + GC treatments applied in addition to MF. Three groups consisting of 79 patients were formed: only HTO (Group 1), HTO + MF (Group 2), and HTO + MF + HA + GC (Group 3). The groups were compared using knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS), visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and range of motion (ROM). The associations between the degree of correction and function and pain were evaluated. Additionally, the KOOS subparameters were compared between the groups. RESULTS: There were significant improvements in the postoperative KOOS and VAS scores in all three groups (p < 0.05). However, the ROM did not improve in Group 1. There was no significant difference in the postoperative KOOS, VAS, or ROM values ​​between Groups 2 and 3, but these values ​​were significantly better in Groups 2 and 3 than in Group 1 (p < 0.05). When the degree of correction increased, there were no significant positive changes in the postoperative KOOS or VAS score in Group 1, unlike in the other two groups (p < 0.05). In corrections of ≥ 10°, while there was no significant difference in the postoperative KOOS or VAS score ​​between Groups 2 and 3, these parameters significantly improved in these two groups compared to Group 1 (p < 0.05). Among the KOOS subparameters, pain and activities of daily living scores ​​were greater in Groups 2 and 3 than in Group 1 (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In MOWHTO, MF is a sufficient treatment method that improves the patient's clinical condition without requiring additional treatments such as HA and GC. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, retrospective cohort study.

Treatment of Chronic Haemophilic Synovitis with PRP: Clinical and In Vitro Studies.

Intra-articular blood, iron and hemosiderin, hydroxyl radical cytokines, and neo-angiogenesis cause synovial inflammation, which leads to cartilage and joint damage. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) inhibits most of the mediators that produce and maintain synovitis. We compile here our work showing the clinical effectiveness of intra-articular PRP injections and their potential role in stopping articular cartilage damage due to bleeding and its possible repair. A total of 116 joints, including knees (63%), elbows (19.8%), and ankles (17.2%), were treated with intra-articular injections of PRP. Moreover, we also show here the number of extracellular DNA traps (ETs) and the PRP effect in the synovial fluid of patients at the time of treatment and six months after. Clinically, it is demonstrated that PRP is effective in reducing bleeding episodes (p < 0.001) and pain (p < 0.0001) and improving the hemophilia joint health score (HJHS) (p < 0.001) at one year of follow-up. Furthermore, our results demonstrate that PRP inhibits ET formation in vitro and reconstitutes the immune system's cellular components in the synovial fluid of patients after treatment. We conclude that PRP can be considered an effective, safe, and easy treatment for hemophilic synovitis.

The Disease-Modifying Effects of a Single Intra-Articular Corticosteroid Injection during the Freezing Phase of Frozen Shoulder in an Animal Model.

Although frequently prescribed for frozen shoulder, it is not known if corticosteroid injections improve the course of frozen shoulder. This study aimed to assess the disease-modifying effects of an intra-articular corticosteroid administration at the freezing phase of frozen shoulder. Twenty-four Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into four groups. Their unilateral shoulders were immobilized for the first 3 days in all groups, followed by an intra-articular corticosteroid injection in Group A, an injection and the cessation of immobilization in Group B, no further intervention in Group C, and the cessation of immobilization in Group D. All rats were sacrificed in Week 3 of study, at which point the passive shoulder abduction angles were measured and the axillary recess tissues were retrieved for histological and Western blot analyses. The passive shoulder abduction angles at the time of sacrifice were 138° ± 8° (Group A), 146° ± 5° (Group B), 95° ± 11° (Group C), 132° ± 8° (Group D), and 158° ± 2° (Control). The histological assessments and Western blots showed greater fibrosis and inflammation in the groups that did not receive the corticosteroid injection (Groups C and D) compared to the corticosteroid-injected groups (Groups A and B). These findings demonstrate the anti-inflammatory and disease-modifying effects of corticosteroid injections during the freezing phase of frozen shoulder in an animal model.

Similar short-term outcomes of ultrasound guided posterior intra-articular and anterior extra-articular corticosteroid injection in the treatment of primary frozen shoulder. A randomized controlled, single-blind study.

Frozen shoulder, a condition characterized by the limitation of active and passive shoulder movements, is predominantly managed conservatively. Corticosteroid injection stands as a widely utilized and effective method for treatment. Nevertheless, the optimal approach for administering the injection remains a subject of controversy. We hypothesized that the injection of corticosteroid through anterior into the extra-articular area would yield superior results than the posterior intra-articular injection. This prospective, randomized, single-blind, and single-center clinical study aimed to compare the therapeutic effectiveness of ultrasound (USG)-guided injection techniques in patients with primary frozen shoulder. We continued the study with 54 patients who met the inclusion criteria. We evaluated patients pre-injection and at the first, third, and sixth weeks after injection. Two distinct approaches were employed: (1) Injection through the anterior extra-articular area around the coracohumeral ligament (CHL), and (2) injection through the posterior route into the glenohumeral joint. Evaluation parameters, including Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores, active range of motion (ROM), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores, and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) scores, were assessed pre-injection and at the first, third, and sixth weeks post injection. No significant differences in the demographic and clinical characteristics, laboratory, or radiological findings were observed between the groups. It was observed that both groups exhibited similar and significant improvement in all measured parameters within their respective groups. Regarding pain scores, a notable decrease in VAS scores was observed in both groups (P = .000). There was no difference between the groups in terms of pre-injection VAS, QuickDASH, and ASES scores and active ROM measurements. The study concluded that there was no significant difference between ultrasound-guided injection of posterior intra-articular injection and anterior extra-articular injection concerning pain, ROM, and functional scores. Both techniques can be considered as viable options in the early stage of the disease. Level I, Therapeutic study.

Image-Guided Foot and Ankle Injections.

Ultrasound is a high-resolution, real-time imaging modality that is frequently used for image-guided procedures. Due to the highly complex anatomy of the foot and ankle, ultrasound should be considered a first-line imaging modality for injections and procedures in this region.

Association between intra-articular hyaluronic acid injections in delaying total knee arthroplasty and safety evaluation in primary knee osteoarthritis: analysis based on Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) claim database in Republic of Korea.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of knee osteoarthritis (KOA), a progressive degenerative disease, is gradually increasing, and it is a progressive degenerative disease. In patients with mild-to-moderate KOA, intra-articular hyaluronic acid (IA-HA) has been shown to be an effective non-operative treatment option that can provide significant pain relief and symptom improvement by increasing intra-articular viscoelasticity. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of IA-HA injections in delaying total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and the safety of IA-HA according to IA-HA type and combination with intra-articular corticosteroid (IA-CS) using a large health insurance claim database. METHODS: For this retrospective cohort study, the study population included patients aged ≥ 50 years with a first diagnosis of KOA between 2009 and 2014, who underwent TKA by 2020, using the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service claim database in Republic of Korea. IA-HA injections were categorized as single or multiple injection regimen agents. Cox proportional hazard models estimated hazard ratios (HR) for TKA risk, adjusted for covariates. Logistic regression assessed the occurrence of adverse events after IA-HA administration. RESULTS: In all, 36,983 patients were included. Patients who received IA-HA injections had a significantly longer time to TKA compared to those who did not (mean delay of approximately 1 year). The IA-HA group had a significantly lower risk of TKA (HR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.60-0.62) than non-IA-HA group after adjusting for covariates, which included age, sex, medical history, number of hospital beds, and CS injection. Single injection IA-HA regimen agents showed the longest time to TKA and lowest risk (HR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.53-0.59). TKA risk decreased with the number of IA-HA cycles. Adverse events occurred in 6.7% of IA-HA cases without CS, with very low incidence of infection. Multiple injection regimen agents (multiple injection regimen 7.0% vs. single injection regimen 3.6%) and concurrent IA-CS use (concurrent IA-CS use 13.9% vs. IA-HA only 6.7%) were associated with higher infection risk. CONCLUSION: IA-HA injections were associated with a significant delay in TKA among patients with KOA. Single-injection regimen agents had the lowest TKA risk. Infection risk increased with multiple injections and concurrent IA-CS use. These findings could suggest the use of IA-HA as an effective non-operative intervention option for managing KOA and delaying TKA. Careful selection of IA-HA type and consideration of concurrent IA-CS use could play a role in delaying the time to TKA and reducing complications.

A retrospective claims data analysis of health care utilization and cost among patients receiving multi-injection intraarticular hyaluronic acid.

BACKGROUND: With the rising costs for knee arthroplasty, therapies that allow patients to avoid or delay surgery following knee osteoarthritis (KOA) may help in reducing overall health care costs. Multiple intraarticular hyaluronic acid (HA) products are available on the market, varying by formulation, molecular weight, and number of injections, but clinical and economic benefits may differ by product. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the all-cause and KOA-related health care resource utilization (HCRU) and costs among newly diagnosed patients with KOA treated with multi-injection HA. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study using a large commercial claims database (Merative MarketScan database) to identify patients with KOA treated with high molecular weight (HMW) (n = 11,200), medium molecular weight (MMW) (n = 10,225), or low molecular weight (LMW) HAs (n = 8,473) between 2016 and 2019. KOA-related and all-cause HCRU and costs were compared within 12 months after the index HA treatment date. The association between outcomes and HA treatments was evaluated using a doubly robust method to adjust for confounding factors. HCRU and costs among the propensity score-weighted HA groups were compared using generalized linear models. RESULTS: HMW HA patients were found to have lower adjusted KOA-related medical costs by $265.37 (P < 0.001) and pharmacy costs by $19.90 (P < 0.001) compared with LMW HA patients, as well as lower all-cause total medical costs by $130.42 (P = 0.013) and pharmacy costs by $63.33 (P < 0.001). HMW HA patients also had a lower adjusted KOA-related medical cost by $205.74 (P < 0.001) and pharmacy cost by $14.39 (P < 0.001) compared with MMW HA patients, as well as lower all-cause medical by $1,195.66 (P < 0.001) and pharmacy by $196.99 (P < 0.001). Three-injection treatment patients (HMW HA, 84%; MMW HA, 82%) had high completion rate, compared with the 5-injection treatment cohort (LMW HA, 48%). CONCLUSIONS: HMW HA patients had statistically significantly lower adjusted all-cause and KOA-related medical and pharmacy costs at 1 year follow-up compared with MMW HA and LMW HA patients. It is unclear if this is related to differences in molecular weight or specific mechanism of actions.

Does intra-articular injection of platelet-rich plasma/platelet-rich fibrin improve outcomes after temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) have been used as adjuncts to temporomandibular joint (TMJ) arthrocentesis but without any high-quality evidence. This systematic review collated data from published randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to provide level-1 evidence on its efficacy. Trials published on the databases of PubMed, Scopus, Embase, CENTRAL, and Web of Science up to 4 August 2023 and comparing intra-articular PRP/PRF with control after TMJ arthrocentesis were eligible. Primary outcomes were pain and maximal mouth opening (MMO). Twelve RCTs were included. Pooled analysis showed that pain scores were significantly reduced with the use of PRP/PRF as compared with control at one month (MD: -0.96 95% CI: -1.58 to -0.35 I2 = 86%), three months (MD: -1.22 95% CI: -1.86 to -0.59 I2 = 85%), and ≥six months (MD: -1.61 95% CI: -2.22 to -1.00 I2 = 88%). Similarly, MMO was significantly improved in the PRP/PRF group at one month (MD: 2.40 95% CI: 1.02 to 3.77 I2 = 88%), three months (MD: 3.17 95% CI: 1.63 to 4.72 I2 = 91%), and ≥six months (MD: 2.98 95% CI: 1.86 to 4.10 I2 = 75%) as compared with the control group. Subgroup analysis for PRP and PRF failed to show any difference in outcomes. Moderate quality evidence suggests that PRP and PRF may significantly improve pain and MMO when used as adjuncts to TMJ arthrocentesis. Due to the small effect size, the clinical significance of the results is questionable. The high heterogeneity in PRP/PRF preparation methods is a significant limitation.

Inadequate anticoagulation and hyperuricemia cause knee pain after platelet-rich plasma injection: A retrospective study.

OBJECTIVES: Platelet-rich plasma treatment delays the need for total knee replacement in patients with knee osteoarthritis. However, its use and preparation remain controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between anticoagulant use in the preparation of platelet-rich plasma and post-treatment pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Additionally, we explored the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma over medium- and long-term follow-up periods and identified other factors that may affect treatment outcomes. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 225 patients with knee osteoarthritis, who underwent knee platelet-rich plasma treatment from June 2021 to January 2022, were examined at three study centres. Patients were categorised, based on the type and amount of anticoagulant used during platelet-rich plasma preparation, into 4% sodium citrate (SC) 0.6 mL, 4% SC 1 mL, 4% SC 2 mL, heparin 0.1 mL, and heparin 0.2 mL groups. We analysed the patients' basic information, pain after treatment, and inflammatory markers (i.e., interleukin 6, tumour necrosis factor-α, and hypersensitive C-reactive protein) in the joint fluid via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and joint fluid crystallisation. Additionally, we assessed the patients' Western Ontario and McMaster University scores and minimal clinically significant differences after treatment. RESULTS: Patients in the 4% SC 0.6 mL and heparin 0.1 mL groups experienced less pain after platelet-rich plasma treatment than did patients in the high-dose anticoagulant group. The joint fluid of patients with pain in these groups had lower levels of inflammatory markers. Patients treated with SC had slightly better medium- and long-term therapeutic outcomes than did patients treated with heparin. Patients with poorly controlled hyperuricemia also experienced pain after platelet-rich plasma treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that platelet-rich plasma prepared using high-dose anticoagulants or administered to patients with poorly controlled hyperuricaemia may lead to moderate-to-severe knee pain and joint effusion after joint puncture therapy. Platelet-rich plasma had a therapeutic effect on knee osteoarthritis; however, its efficacy gradually decreased over time. SC anticoagulant is more suitable for platelet-rich plasma preparation than is heparin. Further studies are needed to understand the safety and the various factors influencing platelet-rich plasma therapy.

Micro-Computed Tomography Analysis of the Knee in Aged Dunkin-Hartley Guinea Pigs after Intra Articular Injection.

The purpose of this protocol is to guide researchers in performing a palpation-guided technique of intra-articular knee injection in guinea pigs and assessment using micro-computed tomography. Dunkin-Hartley guinea pigs are robust models for osteoarthritis research as they spontaneously develop osteoarthritis in their knees. Intra-articular drug delivery is a common method to study the effects of an investigational drug in vivo. In humans, therapeutic agents administered via intra-articular injection can offer pain relief and delay further progression of osteoarthritis. As with any species, the introduction of a needle into a joint space has the potential to cause injury, which can result in pain, lameness, or infection. Such adverse events can compromise animal welfare, confound study results, and necessitate additional animals to achieve study objectives. As such, it is imperative to develop proper injection techniques to prevent complications, especially in longitudinal studies that require multiple, repeated intra-articular injections. Using the presented methodology, five guinea pigs received bilateral knee injections under general anesthesia. Seven days after injection, animals were humanely euthanized for analysis of osteoarthritis severity. No adverse events occurred following anesthesia or knee injections, including limping, pain, or infection. X-ray micro-computed tomography analysis of the knee can detect pathologic changes associated with osteoarthritis. Micro-computed tomography data indicates osteoarthritis is more severe in older animals, as indicated by increased bone mineral density and trabecular thickness with age. These results are consistent with histologic changes and Modified Mankin scores, an established and widely used scoring system to assess arthritis severity in these same animals. This protocol can be utilized to refine intra-articular injections in guinea pigs.

The Role of Corticosteroid Injections in the Treatment of Sacroiliitis: A Narrative Review.

OBJECTIVES: Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a chronic rheumatic, musculoskeletal, inflammatory disease with a propensity to present as sacroiliitis, which manifests as low back, buttock, or thigh pain. Effective primary management of axSpA requires a comprehensive approach specific to each patient and disease severity. Non-pharmacological measures form the cornerstone of treatment. With refractory disease, management also consists of local periarticular and intraarticular injections. The use of sacroiliac joint (SIJ) corticosteroid injections for the treatment of axSpA and localised inflammation, however, is a continuously burgeoning management option. This narrative review aims to present consolidated findings and summarise previously unreferenced or recently available evidence regarding corticosteroid injections to the SIJ for treating sacroiliitis and axSpA. METHODS: A comprehensive literary review with the following electronic databases was searched: MEDLINE via PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE. RESULTS: The initial search yielded a total of 126 references. After duplicates were removed and the remainder analysed for inclusion criteria, 7 studies were included. To stratify each study, injection methodology and characteristics were defined. DISCUSSION: The use of SIJ corticosteroid injections can be an appropriate and effective treatment option for refractory axSpA. The studies presented in this review reported a general trend towards a reduction in pain severity after SIJ corticosteroid injections. Because of the complexity and heterogeneity of the anatomy of the SIJ, image guidance is recommended when performing SIJ injections. Image-guided injections seem to produce better outcomes when compared to anatomic landmark-guided injections.