Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 243
Filter
1.
J Orthop Surg Res ; 19(1): 304, 2024 May 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38769535

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic joint infection is a serious complication following joint replacement. The development of bacterial biofilms bestows antibiotic resistance and restricts treatment via implant retention surgery. Electromagnetic induction heating is a novel technique for antibacterial treatment of metallic surfaces that has demonstrated in-vitro efficacy. Previous studies have always employed stationary, non-portable devices. This study aims to assess the in-vitro efficacy of induction-heating disinfection of metallic surfaces using a new Portable Disinfection System based on Induction Heating. METHODS: Mature biofilms of three bacterial species: S. epidermidis ATCC 35,984, S. aureus ATCC 25,923, E. coli ATCC 25,922, were grown on 18 × 2 mm cylindrical coupons of Titanium-Aluminium-Vanadium (Ti6Al4V) or Cobalt-chromium-molybdenum (CoCrMo) alloys. Study intervention was induction-heating of the coupon surface up to 70ºC for 210s, performed using the Portable Disinfection System (PDSIH). Temperature was monitored using thermographic imaging. For each bacterial strain and each metallic alloy, experiments and controls were conducted in triplicate. Bacterial load was quantified through scraping and drop plate techniques. Data were evaluated using non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test for 2 group comparison. Statistical significance was fixed at p ≤ 0.05. RESULTS: All bacterial strains showed a statistically significant reduction of CFU per surface area in both materials. Bacterial load reduction amounted to 0.507 and 0.602 Log10 CFU/mL for S. aureus on Ti6Al4V and CoCrMo respectively, 5.937 and 3.500 Log10 CFU/mL for E. coli, and 1.222 and 0.372 Log10 CFU/mL for S. epidermidis. CONCLUSIONS: Electromagnetic induction heating using PDSIH is efficacious to reduce mature biofilms of S aureus, E coli and S epidermidis growing on metallic surfaces of Ti6Al4V and CoCrMo alloys.


Subject(s)
Alloys , Biofilms , Disinfection , Escherichia coli , Prosthesis-Related Infections , Staphylococcus aureus , Titanium , Biofilms/drug effects , Disinfection/methods , Escherichia coli/growth & development , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Prosthesis-Related Infections/prevention & control , Prosthesis-Related Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcus epidermidis/drug effects , Joint Prosthesis/microbiology , Arthroplasty, Replacement/instrumentation , Arthroplasty, Replacement/methods , Heating/instrumentation , Heating/methods , Humans , Electromagnetic Phenomena , Vitallium
2.
Acta Microbiol Immunol Hung ; 71(2): 172-181, 2024 Jul 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38619882

ABSTRACT

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) and aseptic loosening (AL) are common complications of total joint arthroplasty. An accumulation of evidence indicates the presence of microbial communities on prosthetic implants, but the overall microbial profile is unclear. In this study, we aimed to investigate the differences in the microbial composition of prosthetic implants obtained from PJI and AL patients using the 16S rRNA sequencing method. Patients who underwent revision hip, knee, or shoulder arthroplasty caused by PJI (n = 20) or AL (n = 10) were enrolled in the study. 16S rRNA sequencing targeting the V3-V4 region was performed on the microbial specimens collected from synovial fluid, periprosthetic deep-tissue, and biofilm during the revision surgery. The sequenced raw data were analysed for microbial composition and ecological and differential abundance analyses using bioinformatics tools. The AL group had relatively balanced and higher diversity, with Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, and Veillonella being prominent. In the PJI group, Staphylococcus and Pseudomonas were predominant, especially in deep-tissue samples and biofilm samples, respectively. The differential abundance analysis identified 15 and 2 distinctive taxa in the AL and PJI groups, respectively. Our findings provided preliminary insights supporting the existence of periprosthetic microbiota in orthopedic implants and explaining the differences in microbial composition between the AL and PJI groups.


Subject(s)
Bacteria , Microbiota , Prosthesis-Related Infections , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S , Humans , Prosthesis-Related Infections/microbiology , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/genetics , Female , Male , Aged , Middle Aged , Bacteria/classification , Bacteria/genetics , Bacteria/isolation & purification , Biofilms/growth & development , Prosthesis Failure , Joint Prosthesis/microbiology , Joint Prosthesis/adverse effects , Aged, 80 and over
3.
J ISAKOS ; 9(3): 353-361, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38272392

ABSTRACT

Early periprosthetic joint infection constitutes one of the most frightening complications of joint replacement. Recently, some evidence has highlighted the potential link between dysregulation of the gut microbiota and degenerative diseases of joints. It has been hypothesized that microbiome dysbiosis may increase the risk of periprosthetic joint infection by facilitating bacterial translocation from these sites to the bloodstream or by impairing local or systemic immune responses. Although the processes tying the gut microbiome to infection susceptibility are still unknown, new research suggests that the presurgical gut microbiota-a previously unconsidered component-may influence the patient's ability to resist infection. Exploring the potential impact of the microbiome on periprosthetic joint infections may therefore bring new insights into the pathogenesis and therapy of these disorders. For a successful therapy, a proper surgical procedure in conjunction with an antibacterial concept is essential. As per the surgical approach, different treatment strategies include surgical irrigation, debridement, antibiotic therapy, and implant retention with or without polyethylene exchange. Other alternatives could be one-stage or two-stage revisions surgery. Interventions that either directly target gut microbes as well as interventions that modify the composition and/or function of the commensal microbes represent an innovative and potentially successful field to be explored. In recent times, innovative therapeutic methods have arisen in the realm of microbiome restoration and the management of gut-related ailments. These progressive approaches offer fresh perspectives on tackling intricate microbial imbalances in the gastrointestinal tract. These emerging therapies signify a shift towards more precise and individualized approaches to microbiome restoration and the management of gut-related disorders. Once a more advanced knowledge of the pathways linking the gut microbiota to musculoskeletal tissues is gained, relevant microbiome-based therapies can be developed. If dysbiosis is proven to be a significant contributor, developing treatments for dysbiosis may represent a new frontier in the prevention of periprosthetic joint infections.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Dysbiosis , Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Prosthesis-Related Infections , Humans , Prosthesis-Related Infections/microbiology , Prosthesis-Related Infections/therapy , Dysbiosis/microbiology , Dysbiosis/therapy , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Debridement/methods , Arthroplasty, Replacement/adverse effects , Joint Prosthesis/microbiology , Joint Prosthesis/adverse effects
4.
J Orthop Surg Res ; 17(1): 9, 2022 Jan 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34991635

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The presence or absence of an implant has a major impact on the type of joint infection therapy. Thus, the aim of this study was the examination of potential differences in the spectrum of pathogens in patients with periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) as compared to patients with native joint infections (NJI). METHODS: In this retrospective study, we evaluated culture-positive synovial fluid samples of 192 consecutive patients obtained from January 2018 to January 2020 in a tertiary care university hospital. For metrically distributed parameters, Mann-Whitney U was used for comparison between groups. In case of nominal data, crosstabs and Chi-squared tests were implemented. RESULTS: Overall, 132 patients suffered from periprosthetic joint infections and 60 patients had infections of native joints. The most commonly isolated bacteria were coagulase-negative Staphylococci (CNS, 28%), followed by Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus, 26.7%), and other bacteria, such as Streptococci (26.3%). We observed a significant dependence between the types of bacteria and the presence of a joint replacement (p < 0.05). Accordingly, detections of CNS occurred 2.5-fold more frequently in prosthetic as compared to native joint infections (33.9% vs. 13.4% p < 0.05). In contrast, S. aureus was observed 3.2-fold more often in NJIs as compared to PJIs (52.2% vs. 16.4%, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The pathogen spectra of periprosthetic and native joint infections differ considerably. However, CNS and S. aureus are the predominant microorganisms in both, PJIs and NJIs, which may guide antimicrobial therapy until microbiologic specification of the causative pathogen.


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Infectious/microbiology , Joint Prosthesis/microbiology , Prosthesis-Related Infections/microbiology , Synovial Fluid/microbiology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Arthritis, Infectious/diagnosis , Arthritis, Infectious/epidemiology , Bacteria , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prosthesis-Related Infections/diagnosis , Prosthesis-Related Infections/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Staphylococcal Infections/diagnosis , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification
5.
Clin Orthop Relat Res ; 479(8): 1655-1664, 2021 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33929342

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after hip and knee arthroplasty is a leading cause of revision surgery, inferior function, complications, and death. The administration of topical, intrawound vancomycin (vancomycin powder) has appeared promising in some studies, but others have found it ineffective in reducing infection risk; for that reason, a high-quality systematic review of the best-available evidence is needed. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: In this systematic review, we asked: (1) Does topical vancomycin (vancomycin powder) reduce PJI risk in hip and knee arthroplasty? (2) Does topical vancomycin lead to an increased risk of complications after hip and knee arthroplasty? METHODS: A search of Embase, MEDLINE, and PubMed databases as of June 2020 was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies comparing topical vancomycin in addition to standard infection prevention regimens (such as routine perioperative intravenous antibiotics) with standard regimens only in primary hip and knee arthroplasty were identified. Patients 18 years or older with a minimum follow-up of 3 months were included. No restrictions on maximal loss to follow-up or PJI definition were imposed. Studies were excluded if they included patients with a history of septic arthritis, used an antibiotic other than vancomycin or a different route of administration for the intervention, performed additional interventions that differed between groups, or omitted a control group. A total of 2408 studies were screened, resulting in nine eligible studies reviewing 3371 patients who received topical vancomycin (vancomycin powder) during a primary THA or TKA and 2884 patients who did not receive it. Groups were comparable with respect to duration of follow-up and loss to follow-up when reported. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale, showing moderate-to-high quality for the included studies. The risks of PJI and overall complications in the topical vancomycin group were compared with those in the control group. RESULTS: One of nine studies found a lower risk of PJI after primary THA or TKA, while eight did not, with odds ratios that broadly bracketed the line of no difference (range of odds ratios across the nine studies 0.09 to 1.97). In the six studies where overall complications could be compared between topical vancomycin and control groups in primary THA or TKA, there was no difference in overall complication risks with vancomycin (range of ORs across the six studies 0.48 to 0.94); however, we caution that these studies were underpowered to detect differences in the types of uncommon complications associated with vancomycin use (such as allergy, ototoxicity, and nephrotoxicity). CONCLUSION: In the absence of clear evidence of efficacy, and without a sufficiently large evidence base reporting on safety-related endpoints, topical vancomycin (vancomycin powder) should not be used in routine primary THA and TKA. Adequately powered, multicenter, prospective trials demonstrating clear reductions in infection risk and large registry-driven audits of safety-related endpoints are required before the widespread use of topical vancomycin can be recommended. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.


Subject(s)
Antibiotic Prophylaxis/methods , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects , Joint Prosthesis/microbiology , Prosthesis-Related Infections/prevention & control , Vancomycin/administration & dosage , Administration, Topical , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Joint Prosthesis/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome
6.
J Orthop Res ; 39(2): 299-307, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33225467

ABSTRACT

Surgical infection is one of the most pressing problems in the field of orthopedic surgery; however, current detection methods are plagued by high costs and long wait times. This study seeks to demonstrate the ability of a novel assay using fluorescently conjugated antibodies and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) to accurately detect bacterial presence on orthopedic surgical explants, tissue, and synovial fluid in 30 min. Explanted hardware, tissue, and synovial fluid samples suspected to be infected were collected from human subjects with institutional review board consent. Samples were prepared using a 30-min protocol, consisting of rinsing, nonspecific blocking and staining steps, and imaged using CLSM. Images were analyzed using ImageJ (National Institute of Health) to determine the percent area of Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria. Results of the assay were compared to the hospital's microbiological laboratory and Gram staining results. Ninety three samples were collected and tested using the 30-min testing protocol; 75 samples were synovial fluid and 18 were tissue and explants. Seventy four of 75 (98.6%) synovial fluid samples correlated with the hospital laboratory's microbiological findings. Of the 18 explant and tissue samples, our assay found bacterial presence in 14 of 18 samples, while the hospital microbiology laboratory found bacterial presence in 13 of 18 samples. This assay reliably stained and rapidly identified the presence of Gram negative and Gram positive bacteria on surgical explants, tissue and synovial fluid in 30 min. This methodology may serve as a point of service tool for the determination of bacterial presence during surgical procedures.


Subject(s)
Fluorescent Antibody Technique/methods , Joint Prosthesis/microbiology , Microscopy, Confocal/methods , Prosthesis-Related Infections/diagnosis , Synovial Fluid/microbiology , Humans , Pilot Projects , Prosthesis-Related Infections/microbiology
7.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 99(1): 115173, 2021 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32992142
8.
Sci Rep ; 10(1): 22389, 2020 12 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33372186

ABSTRACT

Staphylococcus capitis is a coagulase-negative staphylococcus that has been described primarily as causing bloodstream infections in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), but has also recently been described in prosthetic joint infections (PJIs). The multidrug-resistant S. capitis subsp. urealyticus clone NRCS-A, comprising three sublineages, is prevalent in NICUs across the world, but its impact on other patient groups such as those suffering from PJIs or among adults planned for arthroplasty is unknown. Genome sequencing and subsequent analysis were performed on a Swedish collection of PJI isolates (n = 21), nasal commensals from patients planned to undergo arthroplasty (n = 20), NICU blood isolates (n = 9), operating theatre air isolates (n = 4), and reference strains (n = 2), in conjunction with an international strain collection (n = 248). The NRCS-A Outbreak sublineage containing the composite type V SCCmec-SCCcad/ars/cop element was present in PJIs across three Swedish hospitals. However, it was not found among nasal carrier strains, where the less virulent S. capitis subsp. capitis was most prevalent. The presence of the NRCS-A Outbreak clone in adult patients with PJIs demonstrates that dissemination occurs beyond NICUs. As this clone has several properties which facilitate invasive infections in patients with medical implants or immunosuppression, such as biofilm forming ability and multidrug resistance including heterogeneous glycopeptide-intermediate susceptibility, further research is needed to understand the reservoirs and distribution of this hospital-associated pathogen.


Subject(s)
Biofilms , Disease Outbreaks , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial/genetics , Joint Prosthesis/microbiology , Staphylococcal Infections , Staphylococcus capitis/isolation & purification , Staphylococcus capitis/physiology , Adult , Arthroplasty , Female , Humans , Male , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcal Infections/genetics , Sweden/epidemiology
10.
J Bone Joint Surg Am ; 102(20): 1784-1791, 2020 Oct 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33086345

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Bacterial biofilms pose a challenge in treating implant-associated infections. Biofilms provide bacteria with protection against antimicrobial agents and the immune response and often are invisible to the naked eye. As a biofilm-disclosing agent, methylene blue (MB) has shown promise, but lacks rigorous in vitro evaluation. The purposes of the present study were to assess MB as a biofilm-disclosing agent in vitro for common biofilm-forming organisms and to determine performance characteristics across implant materials and healthy tissue types. METHODS: Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 6538) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 27853) biofilms were grown on culture for 2 days in CDC biofilm reactors on titanium, cobalt chromium, polyethylene, and polyether ether ketone (PEEK) coupons. Biofilms were stained with MB solutions of either 0.005% or 0.01% and then were washed with normal saline solution. Digital photographs were obtained to compare the visual sensitivity of the blue dye at these dilutions. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed to confirm the absence or presence of biofilm on MB-stained areas. Uninoculated controls were also assessed. Healthy adult sheep tissues were also stained to determine the staining characteristics of the host tissue. ImageJ was used to determine the relative blue intensity of stained implants and tissues compared with standard curves. RESULTS: S. aureus and P. aeruginosa biofilms stained avidly on titanium, cobalt chromium, polyethylene, and PEEK coupons. There was visible dose-dependent staining based on dye concentration. MB was visible only where biofilms were present as confirmed by SEM. MB did not stain uninoculated controls. Articular cartilage and meniscus demonstrated appreciable staining; bone, tendon, muscle, nerve, and fat did not. Bacterial biofilms demonstrated both dose-dependent and species-specific staining. CONCLUSIONS: MB is an effective disclosing agent for S. aureus and P. aeruginosa biofilms in vitro. MB did not stain implant materials, nor did it stain most healthy tissues in vitro. MB may allow surgeons to see biofilms and may allow for enhanced debridement once visualized.


Subject(s)
Biofilms , Coloring Agents , Joint Prosthesis/microbiology , Methylene Blue , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Staphylococcus aureus , Humans , In Vitro Techniques , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Prosthesis-Related Infections/diagnosis , Prosthesis-Related Infections/microbiology
11.
J Mater Chem B ; 8(45): 10428-10438, 2020 12 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33112351

ABSTRACT

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is one of the main causes for the failure of joint arthroplasty. In view of the limited clinical effect of oral/injectable antibiotics and the drug resistance problem, there is a pressing need to develop antibacterial implants with therapeutic antimicrobial properties. In this work, we prepared a highly antibacterial ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) implant by incorporating tea polyphenols. The presence of tea polyphenols not only improved the oxidation stability of irradiated UHMWPE, but also gave it the desirable antibacterial property. The potent antibacterial activity was attributed to the tea polyphenols that produced excess intracellular reactive oxygen species and destroyed the bacterial membrane structure. The tea polyphenol-blended UHMWPE had no biological toxicity to human adipose-derived stem cells and effectively reduced bacteria-induced inflammation in vivo. These results indicate that tea polyphenol-blended UHMWPE is promising for joint replacement prostheses with multifunctionality to meet patient satisfaction.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/pharmacology , Biocompatible Materials/pharmacology , Joint Prosthesis , Polyethylenes/pharmacology , Polyphenols/pharmacology , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/therapeutic use , Arthroplasty, Replacement/adverse effects , Bacteria/drug effects , Bacterial Infections/etiology , Bacterial Infections/prevention & control , Biocompatible Materials/therapeutic use , Cell Line , Humans , Joint Prosthesis/adverse effects , Joint Prosthesis/microbiology , Male , Polyethylenes/therapeutic use , Polyphenols/therapeutic use , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Tea/chemistry
12.
J Bone Joint Surg Am ; 102(Suppl 2): 114-124, 2020 Nov 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32870618

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Our objective was to identify combination tests used to diagnose chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and develop a stepwise decision-making tool to facilitate diagnosis. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of existing combinations of serum, synovial, and tissue-based tests for diagnosing chronic PJI after hip or knee replacement. This work is an extension of our systematic review of single tests, from which we chose eligible studies that also described the diagnostic performance of combination tests. RESULTS: Thirty-seven eligible articles described the performance of 56 combination tests, of which 8 combinations had at least 2 studies informing both sensitivity and specificity. We also identified 5 types of combination tests: (1) a type-I Boolean combination, which uses Boolean logic (AND, OR) and usually increases specificity at the cost of sensitivity; (2) a type-II Boolean combination, which usually increases sensitivity at the cost of specificity; (3) a triage-conditional rule, in which the value of 1 test serves to triage the use of another test; (4) an arithmetic operation on the values of 2 tests; and (5) a model-based prediction rule based on a fitted model applied to biomarker values. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians can initiate their diagnostic process with a type-II Boolean combination of serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6). False negatives of the combination can be minimized when the threshold is chosen to reach 90% to 95% sensitivity for each test. Once a joint infection is suspected on the basis of serum testing, joint aspiration should be performed. If joint aspiration yields a wet tap, a leukocyte esterase (LER) strip is highly recommended for point-of-care testing, with a reading of ++ or greater indicating PJI; a reading below ++ should be followed by one of the laboratory-based synovial tests. If joint aspiration yields a dry tap, clinicians should rely on preoperative tissue culture and histological analysis for diagnosis. Combinations based on triage-conditional, arithmetic, and model-based prediction rules require further research. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Subject(s)
Clinical Laboratory Techniques/methods , Decision Support Techniques , Joint Prosthesis/adverse effects , Prosthesis-Related Infections/diagnosis , Chronic Disease , Humans , Joint Prosthesis/microbiology , Sensitivity and Specificity
14.
Int J Infect Dis ; 100: 158-163, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32827750

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Sonication of explanted prosthesis constitutes an element of microbiological diagnostics. The aim of performing this procedure is to remove biofilm and to increase sensitivity of diagnostics. Ultrasound used in medical purposes are low-frequency and low-intensity. With this wide range of frequency which can be used in sonication process it is necessary to find the golden mean between biofilm dislodging and planktonic bacteria sparing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The aim of this study was to determine the least harming low-intensity ultrasound frequency (35 kHz, 40 kHz or 53 kHz) used during sonication process with other parameters constant. Four bacteria species were examined: S. aureus, E. faecalis, E. coli, K. pneumoniae. Number of microbiological studies (n) for each group (g) counted 40 specimens (based on scheme 1 bacteria type - 4 groups, 40 studies each). RESULTS: A detailed analysis of gathered data was conducted. Based on study findings following conclusions were drawn. Sonication has a significant and negative impact on survival of sonicated planktonic bacteria. Part of bacteria in planktonic state are damaged/killed by ultrasound, which is demonstrated by lower CFU count in sonicated samples versus control group. CONCLUSIONS: Optimal ultrasound frequencies for sonication of S. aureus, P. aeruginosa and E. coli are 35 kHz and 40 kHz. Ultrasound frequencies used in sonication process (35 kHz, 40 kHz, 53 kHz) of E. coli showed same impact on bacteria survival. It is crucial to perform further assessment of ultrasound parameters on clinical effects of sonication used in PJI diagnostics.


Subject(s)
Biofilms , Joint Diseases/microbiology , Joint Prosthesis/microbiology , Prosthesis-Related Infections/microbiology , Sonication/methods , Enterococcus faecalis/physiology , Escherichia coli/physiology , Humans , Joint Diseases/diagnosis , Joint Prosthesis/adverse effects , Prosthesis-Related Infections/diagnosis , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/physiology , Staphylococcus aureus/physiology , Ultrasonic Waves
15.
J Orthop Surg Res ; 15(1): 298, 2020 Aug 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32762703

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the diagnostic value of D-dimer in detecting periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). METHODS: A systematic search and screening of relevant studies was performed in the databases PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase using the following medical subject headings (MeSH) or keywords: "arthroplasty or joint prosthesis or joint replacement or periprosthetic joint or prosthetic joint", "infection or infectious or infected", and "D-dimer or serum D-dimer or plasma D-dimer or fibrin degradation products". Data were subsequently analysed and processed using Meta-Disc. RESULTS: Seven studies with 1285 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio were 0.75 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70-0.79), 0.69 (95% CI 0.66-0.72), 3.01 (95% CI 1.84-4.93), 0.32 (95% CI 0.19-0.53), and 10.20 (95% CI 3.63-28.64), respectively. Subgroup analyses showed that the use of serum D-dimer had better sensitivity and specificity than plasma D-dimer for the diagnosis of PJI. CONCLUSIONS: Serum D-dimer was shown to have a better diagnostic value than plasma D-dimer for the diagnosis of PJI. Further research is required for clarification.


Subject(s)
Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products/analysis , Joint Prosthesis/microbiology , Plasma/metabolism , Prosthesis-Related Infections/diagnosis , Serum/metabolism , Arthroplasty/instrumentation , Blood Sedimentation , C-Reactive Protein/metabolism , Early Diagnosis , Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products/metabolism , Humans , Joint Prosthesis/adverse effects , Prosthesis-Related Infections/blood , Sensitivity and Specificity
16.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 26(11): 1473-1480, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32619734

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Management for prosthetic joint infections remains a challenging area for both infectious diseases and orthopaedic surgery, particularly in the setting of treatment failure. This is compounded by a lack of level 1 evidence to guide approaches. The optimal management of prosthetic joint infections requires a multi-disciplinary approach combined with shared decision making with the patient. AIMS: This article describes the approach to prosthetic joint infections in the setting of treatment failure. SOURCES: Narrative review based on literature review from PubMed. There was no time limit on the studies included. In addition, the reference list for included studies were reviewed for literature saturation with manual searching of clinical guidelines. Management approaches described incorporate evidence- and eminence-based recommendations from expert guidelines and clinical studies, where applicable. CONTENT: The surgical and antimicrobial approaches for prosthetic joint infections are described for first-line treatment of prosthetic joint infections and approaches in the event of treatment failure. Management approaches are based on an understanding of the role the biofilm plays in the pathogenesis of prosthetic joint infections. The management of these infections aims to fulfil two key goals: to eradicate the biofilm-associated microorganisms and, to maintain a functional joint and quality of life. In treatment failure, these goals are not always feasible, and the role of the multi-disciplinary team and shared-decision making are prominent. IMPLICATIONS: Prosthetic joint surgery is a high-volume surgery, and the demand for this surgery is continually increasing. With this, the number of infections requiring expert care will also increase. Eminence-based management approaches have been established to guide treatment failure until knowledge gaps in optimal management are addressed by well-designed, clinical trials.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Device Removal/methods , Joint Prosthesis/microbiology , Prosthesis-Related Infections/therapy , Aged , Debridement , Decision Making, Shared , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , Male , Patient Care Team , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Quality of Life , Treatment Failure
17.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 97(3): 115040, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32354459

ABSTRACT

Staphylococci are the most common causes of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). TNP-2092 is an investigational hybrid drug composed of rifamycin and quinolizinone pharmacophores conjugated via a covalent linker. We determined minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC), and minimum biofilm bactericidal concentration (MBBC) values of TNP-2092 against 80 PJI-associated Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates compared to ciprofloxacin and rifampin alone and in combination, alongside daptomycin and vancomycin. TNP-2092 exhibited the following activity against S. aureus: MIC50/MIC90, ≤0.0075/0.015 µg/mL; MBC50/MBC90, 0.5/4 µg/mL; and MBBC50/MBBC90, 0.5/2 µg/mL, and the following activity against S. epidermidis: MIC50/MIC90, ≤0.0075/0.015 µg/mL; MBC50/MBC90, 0.015/0.125 µg/mL; and MBBC50/MBBC90, 0.06/0.25 µg/mL. TNP-2092 MIC, MBC, and MBBC values were >8 µg/mL for 1 isolate, while MIC values were ≤0.25 µg/mL and MBC and MBBC values were ≤4 µg/mL for all other isolates. Results of this study show that TNP-2092 has promising in vitro activity against PJI-associated staphylococci.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Prosthesis-Related Infections/microbiology , Rifamycins/pharmacology , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcus/drug effects , Biofilms/drug effects , Biofilms/growth & development , Humans , Joint Prosthesis/adverse effects , Joint Prosthesis/microbiology , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Staphylococcus/isolation & purification
18.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 99(15): e19735, 2020 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32282732

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The increase in the number of patients with prosthetic joints will entail a rise in the absolute number of infections associated with these procedures. Although less frequent, infections by Candida species are also expected to increase, and the clinical and surgical management of these cases is based on case reports and opinion of specialists. The objective of the present study was to review the available literature and describe the cases of prosthetic joint infection caused by Candida species in patients of the Institute of Orthopedics and Trauma of the University of São Paulo Faculty of Medicine Clinics Hospital (IOT-HCFMUSP) between 2007 and 2014. PATIENT CONCERNS: Eleven patients were diagnosed with prosthetic joint infection due to Candida with mean age of 65 years. The most frequent comorbidities were heart disease and diabetes mellitus, and the main personal antecedent was previous bacterial infection in the prosthetic joint. At least one risk factor for fungal infection was present in 73% of the patients. There was no difference between the prevalence of infections caused by Candida albicans and non-albicans Candida species, and there was bacterial co-infection in 55% of the cases. DIAGNOSIS: For building up the case series, patients with cultures of bone and joint specimens that were positive for Candida species and had a clinical diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection were included in the case series. INTERVENTIONS: Surgical debridement with removal of the prosthesis was the most frequently used surgical approach (45%). All patients were treated with monotherapy, and the most frequently used antifungal agent was fluconazole. The total duration of antifungal therapy was 6 months in 73% of the cases. OUTCOMES: After the initial management, 73% of the patients achieved clinical remission. CONCLUSION: The most indicated initial management was debridement with removal of the prosthesis, and the most used treatment regimen was fluconazole monotherapy. The most prevalent treatment duration was 6 months. The initial management led to a favorable outcome in 73% of the cases. DESCRIPTORS: Prosthetic joint infection, Candida, treatment, and diagnosis.


Subject(s)
Candida albicans/isolation & purification , Joint Prosthesis/microbiology , Osteoarthritis/surgery , Prosthesis-Related Infections/drug therapy , Prosthesis-Related Infections/microbiology , Prosthesis-Related Infections/surgery , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Bacterial Infections/surgery , Coinfection/epidemiology , Comorbidity , Debridement/methods , Female , Fluconazole/therapeutic use , Humans , Joint Prosthesis/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Mycoses/drug therapy , Mycoses/epidemiology , Mycoses/surgery , Osteoarthritis/complications , Prevalence , Prosthesis-Related Infections/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
19.
Orthop Clin North Am ; 51(2): 141-146, 2020 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32138852

ABSTRACT

Prosthetic joint infection is still a rare but devastating complication following total hip and knee arthroplasty. The incidence of prosthetic joint infection ranges from 2% to 4% in primary procedures as opposed to nearly 20% in revisions. The challenges that arise here include mainly diagnostic uncertainty, management in immunocompromised patients, recurrent infection, infection around a well-fixed implant, and substantial bone loss, and require careful preoperative assessment and well-defined management plans. This article summarizes recent developments in the diagnosis and management of this increasingly prevalent issue specifically focusing on outcomes following debridement, antibiotics, and implants retention and one-stage revision procedures.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects , Prosthesis-Related Infections/diagnosis , Prosthesis-Related Infections/therapy , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Biomarkers/analysis , Debridement , Device Removal , Humans , Joint Prosthesis/adverse effects , Joint Prosthesis/microbiology , Prosthesis-Related Infections/etiology , Prosthesis-Related Infections/microbiology , United Kingdom
20.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 26(8): 1034-1038, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32120041

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The use of implanted medical devices is associated with a small but clinically important risk of foreign body infection. A key question is: why do some patients develop chronic infection associated with an implanted device, but most do not? AIMS: The literature on patient-specific risk factors for chronic infections associated with five types of implants was surveyed to glean clues about the etiology of these infections. SOURCES: Data were collected from 47 articles through calendar year 2017 for five categories of device-related infections: cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), hernia meshes, prosthetic hip and knee joints, prosthetic shoulder joints and breast implants. CONTENT: Important risk factors include immunomodulation/steroid therapy, diabetes, smoking, and renal disease/haemodialysis-findings that point to a critical role of a compromised innate immune response in determining vulnerable subpopulations. IMPLICATIONS: A model of biofilm-related device infection is presented that posits defects in the innate immune response both systemically and locally, in the immediate vicinity of an abiotic biomaterial. The limitations of in vitro and animal models of chronic device-related infections are discussed in this context as are implications for research and clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Biofilms/growth & development , Foreign-Body Reaction/etiology , Prostheses and Implants/microbiology , Prosthesis-Related Infections/etiology , Animals , Breast Implants/microbiology , Female , Humans , Joint Prosthesis/microbiology , Male , Risk Factors , Surgical Mesh/microbiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...