Temperature profile during endourological laser activation: introducing the thermal safety distance concept.

PURPOSE: To examine temporal-spatial distribution of heat generated upon laser activation in a bench model of renal calyx. To establish reference values for a safety distance between the laser fiber and healthy tissue during laser lithotripsy. METHODS: We developed an in-vitro experimental setup employing a glass pipette and laser activation under various intra-operative parameters, such as power and presence of irrigation. A thermal camera was used to monitor both temporal and spatial temperature changes during uninterrupted 60-second laser activation. We computed the thermal dose according to Sapareto and Dewey's formula at different distances from the laser fiber tip, in order to determine a safety distance. RESULTS: A positive correlation was observed between average power and the highest recorded temperature (Spearman's coefficient 0.94, p < 0.001). Irrigation was found to reduce the highest recorded temperature, with a maximum average reduction of 9.4 °C at 40 W (p = 0.002). A positive correlation existed between average power and safety distance values (Spearman's coefficient 0.86, p = 0.001). A thermal dose indicative of tissue damage was observed at 20 W without irrigation (safety distance 0.93±0.11 mm). While at 40 W, irrigation led to slight reduction in mean safety distance (4.47±0.85 vs. 5.22±0.09 mm, p = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: Laser settings with an average power greater than 10 W deliver a thermal dose indicative of tissue damage, which increases with higher average power values. According to safety distance values from this study, a maximum of 10 W should be used in the ureter, and a maximum of 20 W should be used in kidney in presence of irrigation.

The Impact of Pelvicalyceal System Anatomy on Stone Formation in Patients with Single Lower Pole Calyceal Stone on Computed Tomography Urography.

BACKGROUND: To compare various lower pole pelvicalyceal anatomical factors of stone bearing kidney with contralateral normal kidneys and determine whether these factors predispose to stone formation in one kidney. METHODS: A descriptive study was done with Computed Tomography of 54 patients with solitary lower pole calculus in one kidney and normal contralateral kidney were included. Various lower pole pelvicalyceal anatomical factors like infundibulopelvic angle, infundibular width, infundibular length and calyceopelvic height of both stone bearing and contralateral kidneys were measured and compared for any differences Results: The mean infundibular width was 5.4±1.9mm on stone bearing kidneys and 5.2±2.05mm on contralateral normal kidneys. The mean infundibular length was 18.9±4.4mm on stone bearing kidneys and 18.8±3.9mm on contralateral normal kidneys. The mean infundibulopelvic angle was 47.9±10.8° on stone bearing kidneys and 47.6±11.2° on contralateral kidneys. The mean calyceopelvic height was 15.7±4.6mm on stone bearing kidneys and 15.5±3.9mm (range 7.5to 23.1mm) on contralateral kidneys. There were no statistically significant differences between stone bearing and contralateral normal kidneys in respect to these pelvicalyceal anatomical factors. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we found no significant difference in lower pole pelvicalyceal anatomical factors between stone bearing kidneys and contralateral normal kidneys and therefore these factors do not seem to have significant role in stone formation in one kidney compared with the other.

Comparative analysis of scoring systems for patients undergoing retrograde intrarenal surgery with isolated lower calyx stones.

PURPOSE: It is critical to provide patients with accurate information on potential surgical outcomes during the preoperative phase. Several scoring systems have been developed for this specific purpose. This study aimed to examine the predicted efficacy of scoring systems in patients with isolated lower calyx stones who underwent retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 85 patients who underwent RIRS for lower calyx stones between 2016 and 2023. The study computed each participant's Resorlu-Unsal Stone score (RUSS), R.I.R.S. scoring system score, Modified Seoul National University Renal Stone Complexity (S-ReSC) score, S.T.O.N.E. score, Ito's nomogram, and T.O.HO score. Residual stones less than 4 mm were classified as clinically insignificant residual fragments (CIRFs) and regarded as successful. Following that, we used receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves to compare various scoring systems' success predictions. RESULTS: The median scores for RUSS, R.I.R.S. scoring system, Modified S-ReSC, S.T.O.N.E., Ito's nomogram, and T.O.HO score were 1 (1), 7 (2), 2 (0), 11 (1), 18 (4), and 7 (1), respectively. When CIRF cases were included, the stone-free rate increased to 80%. Only Ito's nomogram from scoring systems has a statistically significant cut-off value for success in ROC analysis (p = 0.021). In multivariate analysis, stone volume and preoperative hydronephrosis were associated with success (p = 0.004 and p = 0.035, respectively). CONCLUSION: In the multivariate analysis, none of the scoring systems were significantly associated with success. Hence, a new scoring system must be developed exclusively for patients with isolated lower pole stones undergoing RIRS.

Illumination matters part IV: blackout and whiteout in flexible ureteroscopy - first report on a phenomenon observed by PEARLS.

PURPOSE: To date, no study has evaluated effects of varying brightness settings on image quality from flexible ureteroscopes submerged in saline. The aim was to evaluate blackout and whiteout occurrences in an in-vitro kidney calyx model. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We evaluated a series of contemporary flexible ureteroscopes including the Storz Flex-Xc and Flex-X2s, Olympus V3 and P7, Pusen 7.5F and 9.2F, as well as OTU WiScope using a 3D-printed enclosed pink in-vitro kidney calyx model submerged in saline. Endoscopic images were captured with ureteroscope tip placed at 5 mm,10 mm and 20 mm distances. The complete range of brightness settings and video capture modes were evaluated for each scope. Distribution of brightness on a grayscale histogram of images was analyzed (scale range 0 to 255). Blackout and whiteout were defined as median histogram ranges from 0 to 35 and 220 to 255, respectively (monitor image too dark or too bright for the human eye, respectively). RESULTS: Blackout occurred with the P7, Pusen 7.5F, 9.2F and WiScope at all distances, and V3 at 20 mm - with lowest brightness settings. Whiteout occurred with Flex-X2s, V3 and P7 at 5 mm and 10 mm, as well as with V3 and P7 at 20 mm - mostly with highest brightness settings. The Flex-Xc had neither blackout nor whiteout at all settings and distances. CONCLUSION: Blackout or whiteout of images is an undesirable property that was found for several scopes, possibly impacting diagnostic and therapeutic purposes during ureteroscopy. These observations form a guide to impact a urologist's choice of instruments and settings.

Prone vs supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy: does position affect renal pelvic pressures?

The purpose of this study was to measure and compare renal pelvic pressure (RPP) between prone and supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in a benchtop model. Six identical silicone kidney models were placed into anatomically correct prone or supine torsos constructed from patient CT scans in the corresponding positions. A 30-Fr renal access sheath was placed in either the upper, middle, or lower pole calyx for both prone and supine positions. Two 9-mm BegoStones were placed in the respective calyx and RPPs were measured at baseline, irrigating with a rigid nephroscope, and irrigating with a flexible nephroscope. Five trials were conducted for each access in both prone and supine positions. The average baseline RPP in the prone position was significantly higher than the supine position (9.1 vs 2.7 mmHg; p < 0.001). Similarly, the average RPP in prone was significantly higher than supine when using both the rigid and flexible nephroscopes. When comparing RPPs for upper, middle, and lower pole access sites, there was no significant difference in pressures in either prone or supine positions (p > 0.05 for all). Overall, when combining all pressures at baseline and with irrigation, with all access sites and types of scopes, the mean RPP was significantly higher in the prone position compared to the supine position (14.0 vs 3.2 mmHg; p < 0.001). RPPs were significantly higher in the prone position compared to the supine position in all conditions tested. These differences in RPPs between prone and supine PCNL could in part explain the different clinical outcomes, including postoperative fever and stone-free rates.

[The 1-cm lower calyx calculus: SWT, URS or Mini-PCNL? Guidelines vs. reality.] / Der 1 cm UKG-Stein: ESWL, URS oder Mini-PCNL? Leitlinien versus Realität.

Urinary stones of the upper urinary tract can be considered a widespread public health concern due to their high incidence and prevalence and their health policy-related and financial implications. A significant proportion of newly diagnosed kidney stones are lower-pole stones, i.e., stones affecting the lower calyx group of the renal pelvicalyceal system. These are often diagnosed by chance, i.e., as incidental findings during ultrasound or CT scans performed for other reasons, or as "secondary stones" detected during the diagnostic work-up of symptomatic urinary stones in other locations. Residual disintegrates after extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) or endoscopic stone therapy constitute a further, quantitatively significant group. These incidentally discovered lower-pole stones are often characterised by their small size and lack of symptoms. It stands to reason that some of these small, asymptomatic lower-pole stones do not always remain small and asymptomatic, and that treatment tends to become more complex with increasing size. There has been an astonishing lack of published studies with a high level of evidence over the last 20 years to provide a conclusive and reproducible answer to the question posed in this review. Small, asymptomatic stones can be monitored. Symptomatic and rapidly growing stones should be treated. There is a lack of valid risk factors allowing an identification of subgroups that should be treated prophylactically at the asymptomatic stage. In active therapy, a 10-to-20-year-old principle still holds true today: a high stone-free rate in one therapy session is offset by an increased complication rate, with increasing miniaturisation in endourology (retrograde and percutaneous) and increasingly effective laser disintegration shifting this basic principle more and more in favour of flexible URS and (mini, micro) PCNL. The range of indications for ESWL is undoubtedly becoming smaller, and this also applies to lower-pole stones. The results of an ongoing prospective randomised study comparing the different treatment modalities, albeit with recruitment difficulties, are still pending.

What should the optimal access site be for percutaneous treatment of anterior lower pole calyx stones?

OBJECTIVES: Compared to other stone groups, anterior calyx stones are more challenging for endourologists to treat. This study aims to evaluate the differences between our latest technique and conventional techniques for treating anterior calyx stones in the lower pole. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with isolated anterior lower pole calyx or complex lower pole stones with anterior calyx branching were included in the study. The first group included lower pole access, while the second group included percutaneous treatment through the middle or upper pole. In the first group, the posterior calyx or direct anterior calyx approach was utilised depending on whether the stone was isolated calyx, complex structure or calyx anatomy, while in the second group, percutaneous nephrolithotomy was performed through the middle or upper pole posterior calyx access. RESULTS: There were 37 patients in Group 1 and 25 patients in Group 2. Both groups were similar regarding patient age, sex, stone burden, and stone localisation (p > 0.05). When comparing operative and post-operative data between groups, it was found that the stone clearance rate, number of accesses, and haematocrit decrease were statistically superior in the second group (p: 0.003, p: 0.002, p: 0.018), with no significant difference in mean operative time, length of hospital stay, fluoroscopy time and pain score (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous surgery utilising an access from a calyx distal to the stone may offer better clearance and lower morbidity rates for lower pole stones involving the anterior calyx.

Navigating Entire Collecting System During Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Is Rigid Nephroscopy Enough? A Prospective Study by International Alliance of Urolithiasis Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Working Group.

Background: During percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), accessibility to the entire collecting system is crucial to check the presence of any residual stone fragments. In this study, we aimed to identify the rate of accessibility of all caliceal cavities using lower-, middle- and, upper-pole punctures and the eventual benefit of simultaneous utilization of retrograde/antegrade flexible nephroscopy. Materials and Methods: Data of patients undergone supine PCNL in five different institutions were collected prospectively. Access status to other poles of the kidney with a rigid nephroscope, antegrade access status to the other poles of the kidney with a flexible nephroscope, or retrograde access with a flexible ureterorenoscope were all evaluated together with detection of residual fragments. Access status to the other poles of the kidney with anterograde and retrograde approaches were compared. Results: Data of 226 patients were analyzed and stone-free status was achieved in 207 (91.6%) of the patients. The entire collecting system could be successfully approached by a rigid nephroscope in 50% of the cases through middle-pole puncture. This rate was significantly higher than that of lower-pole puncture (37.1%) and upper-pole puncture (28.1%) (P = .035). The successful approach to the entire collecting system with retrograde ureterorenoscopy was possible in 97.6% of the cases, while the successful approach was possible in 48 of the 60 cases (80%) with the retrograde approach (P < .0001). Conclusions: During PCNL, evaluation of the entire collecting system with rigid nephroscopy is not possible in a significant portion of the patients. We believe that the application of flexible nephroscopy, particularly via retrograde approach improves the stone-free rates.

Kidney collecting system anatomy applied to endourology - a narrative review.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the surgical anatomy of the kidney collecting system through a narrative review of the literature, highlighting its importance during diagnosis and its approach during surgical procedures for the treatment of renal stones. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We carried out a review about the anatomy of the kidney collecting system. We analyzed papers published in the past 40 years in the databases Pubmed, Embase and Scielo, and we included only papers in English and excluded case reports, editorials and opinions of specialists. RESULTS: Renal collecting system could be divided in four groups: A1 - kidney midzone (KM), drained by minor calyx that are dependent on the superior or the inferior caliceal groups; A2 - KM drained by crossed calyx, one draining into the superior caliceal group and another draining into the inferior caliceal group; B1 - KM drained by a major caliceal group independent of both the superior and inferior groups; and B2 - KM drained by minor calyx entering directly into the renal pelvis. Some details and anatomic variations of the collecting system are related to clinical and radiological aspects, particularly perpendicular calyces, interpyelocalyx space, position of calyces in relation to renal border, classification of the renal collecting system, infundibular diameter and the angle between the lower infundibulum and renal pelvis. CONCLUSION: The knowledge of intra-renal collecting system divisions and variations as the angle between the renal pelvis and lower infundibula, position of the calices in relationship with renal edge and the diameter and position of the calyces are important for the planning of minimally invasive renal surgeries.

Ureterocalicostomy for complex upper ureteral stricture: a narrative review of the current literature.

Upper ureteral stricture is a relatively rare but increasingly encountered condition in clinical practice. While simple stricture can often be addressed through endoluminal treatment or surgical reconstruction, complex upper ureteral stricture poses challenges, particularly in patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) or perirenal pelvic fibrosis and scarring resulting from previous surgeries. These cases present difficulties for traditional endoluminal and ureteral reconstruction treatments, posing a significant problem for many clinical surgeons. Our study involved a thorough search and comprehensive analysis of the existing literature on Ureterocalicostomy (UC). The literature indicates that UC is a safe and effective treatment for ureteral stenosis. By resecting the renal lower pole parenchyma, it is possible to achieve mucosal anastomosis between the calyceal and ureteral mucosa, leading to the restoration of normal urinary excretion. This technique has emerged as an alternative for treating complex upper ureteral strictures. However, there is a lack of direct comparative studies between open surgery and minimally invasive surgery. Our findings revealed a scarcity of relevant review documents, with most being case reports or retrospective studies conducted in single centers with small sample sizes. Therefore, it is crucial to conduct large-scale, multicenter prospective studies and long-term follow-up to validate the long-term efficacy of UC. This article reviews the development history of UC and focuses on a comprehensive discussion of its indications, surgical techniques, and complications.

The Effect of Ureteral Access Sheath Use/Caliber Change on Outcomes of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery, Short-Term Kidney Functions, Radiation Exposure, Ureteroscope Lifetime, and Factors Predicting Insertion Failure: A RIRSearch Study.

Background: The aim of this study was (1) to explore effect of ureteral access sheath (UAS) use on primary retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) outcomes, short-term kidney functions, radiation exposure, and ureteroscope lifetime (URS-LT) and (2) to reveal factors that predict UAS insertion failure. Materials and Methods: Patients (n = 1318) who underwent RIRS without UAS (Group 1), those who had operation with a <11-13 Fr (Group 2), and those with a ≥11-13 Fr UAS were matched (1:1:2) and compared. Stone-free rate (SFR), intra- and postoperative complications, acute kidney injury (AKI), fluoroscopy time, URS-LT, and UAS insertion failure were the outcomes. Results: SFR, which was highest in Group 3 (75%, 71% and 87.3%, respectively; P = .001), was significantly associated with use of ≥11-13 Fr (odds ratio [OR]: 4.2, P < .001), but was not with use of <11-13 Fr UAS (OR: 1.3, P = .3). Group 3 had less need for auxiliary procedure (15%, 16%, and 7.4%, respectively; P = .03). Five percent of patients had a risk of AKI, but only 0.3% developed AKI. Although UAS use was protective against creatinine increase (OR: 0.65, P = .02), increased risk of AKI was only associated with female gender (OR: 5.5, P < .001). Fluroscopy times were 5, 15, and 87 sn, respectively (P < .001). Short URS-LT was strongly associated with high frequency of lower calix stones (r = -0.94, P = .005), but URS-LT was not correlated with sheathless case rate (r = 0.59, P = .22). UAS insertion success in first attempt was more likely in younger (OR: 0.99, P = .03), hydronephrotic (OR: 3.4, P < .001), and female cases (OR: 1.5, P = .008). But absolute UAS insertion failure was associated with female gender (OR: 2.7, P = .017). Conclusions: Not any UAS use but a higher caliber UAS use may improve SFR and protect against AKI after RIRS. Although UAS insertion failure is seen mostly in men, it may be more challenging in women owing to less efficacy of preoperative Double-J stent.

Comparative study between antegrade flexible ureteroscopy and reterograde intrarenal surgery in the management of impacted upper ureteric stones 1.5 cm or larger.

OBJECTIVE: To prospectively investigate the safety and efficacy of antegrade flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) with the following criteria (supine, ultrasonic guided puncture through lower calyx with 14 fr tract, tubeless) versus retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in the management of large impacted upper ureteric stones ≥ 1.5 cm. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study recruited 61 patients with single large impacted upper ureteric stone of ≥ 1.5 cm. The patients were randomly allocated to two groups. Group A, included 31 patients who treated by antegrade FURS, all patients were put in supine modified galadako Valdivia position and the renal access is reached by ultrasonic guided puncture through the lower calyx with dilatation upto 14 fr to insert ureteric access sheath and all cases were tubless with JJ stent insertion. Group B, included 30 patients who were treated by RIRS with JJ stent insertion. Stone fragmentation was done by holmium laser in both group. RESULTS: Group A was significantly associated with higher proportion of SFR (90.3%) compared to Group B (70%) (p = 0.046). Group B was significantly associated with shorter operative time and fluoroscopy time in comparison with Group A (p < 0.001). No significant differences were found between studied groups regarding bleeding (p = 0.238). Urosepsis showed significantly higher proportion associated with retrograde approach when compared to antegrade approach (p = 0.024). CONCLUSION: This study showed that antegrade FURS is safe and more effective than RIRS for the management of large impacted upper ureteric stones ≥ 1.5 cm.

[Clinical experience with reusable and single use flexible ureterorenoscopes].

INTRODUCTION: Flexible ureterorenoscopy (fURS) has become one of the most frequent procedures in urology in recent years. The main problem on the way of the spread of flexible ureterorenoscopy in everyday urological practice all over the world is the fragility of endoscopes. MAIN AIM: To evaluate the potential use of reusable and single-use ureterorenoscopes for kidney stones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The analysis included 30 patients who underwent of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones. The patients were divided into two groups. I gr. - RIRS was performed with a reusable flexible ureterorenoscope Flex XC "Karl Storz" (Germany) (n=20), II gr. - a single-use flexible ureterorenoscope PU3022 "Pusen" (China) (n=10) was used. Lithotripsy was performed with a Lumenis Pulse 100H holmium laser (Israel, USA). RESULTS: The age of patients, size and density of stones in I gr. and II gr. were comparable (42.5+/-16.9 vs 50+/-10.07 (years); 8.5+/-2.9 vs 10+/-2.5 (mm); 1248+/-315.3 vs 1376+/-223.3(HU+). Intraoperative complications were noted: in the I gr. - migration of stone fragments and bleeding; in the II gr. - migration of a fragment of stone. The time and efficiency of the operation of I gr. and II gr. were 75+/-39.9 vs 82.5+/-45.7 (min); 18 (90%) vs 9 (90%), respectively. Additional shock wave lithotripsy was required in 2 cases in the I gr., and more frequent usage stent was noted in the II gr. 10 (100%). In I gr. 5 (25%) patients had signs of inflammatory complication and 1 (5%) patient needed a change of antibiotics, after operation. The acute pyelonephritis was indicating in 2 (20%) patients of II gr. in the same period. DISCUSSION: The use of access sheath was in all patients of II gr. and in 14 (70%) cases of I gr. In 1 case of the II gr. it was not possible extract of a stone fragment from the lower calyx due to the thickness of the intrument. The possibility of bending was higher for the "Karl Storz" ureterorenoscope due to smaller diameter of the instrument. One of the disadvantages of reusable flexible ureterorenoscope is the fragility of the instrument. In our research, the repair of the instrument was required after 12 manipulations. CONCLUSION: The use of smaller instruments, the use of new digital imaging, the mobility of devices, allows performing interventions simultaneously by two surgeons, achieving the greatest fragmentation or evacuation of fragments of stones with good visualization, as well as using methods of drainage-free lithotripsy ("tubless").

Optimizing stone harvesting in miniaturized-PCNL: a critical examination of renal access angles, technology, and the role they play in operative efficiency.

PURPOSE: Stone retrieval can be a laborious aspect of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). A unique phenomenon of mini-PCNL is the vortex-effect (VE), a hydrodynamic form of stone retrieval. Additionally, the vacuum-assisted sheath (VAS) was recently developed as a new tool for stone extraction. The purpose of our study is to investigate the impact of renal access angle (as a surrogate for patient positioning) on stone retrieval efficiency and compare the efficiency among methods of stone retrieval. METHODS: A kidney model was filled with 3 mm artificial stones. Access to the mid-calyx was obtained using a 15Fr sheath. Stones were retrieved over three minutes at angles of 0°, 25°, and 75° utilizing the VE, VAS, and basket. Stones were weighed for comparison of stones/retraction and stones/minute. Trials were repeated three times at each angle. RESULTS: Renal access angle of 0° was associated with increased stone retrieval for both the VE and VAS (p < 0.05). The VE was the most effective method for stones retrieved per individual retraction at an angle of 0° (p < 0.005), although when analyzed as stones retrieved per minute, the VE and VAS were no longer statistically different (p = 0.08). At 75°, none of the methods were statistically different, regardless if analyzed as stones per retraction or per minute (p = 0.20-0.40). CONCLUSIONS: Renal access angle of 0° is more efficient for stone retrieval than a steep upward angle. There is no difference in stone retrieval efficiency between the VE and VAS methods, although both are superior to the basket at lower sheath angles.

Investigating ESWL success rate in the treatment of renal and ureteral stones in children.

OBJECTIVE: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is one of the most important methods of treatment for stone in children. Therefore, this study was conducted to determine the success rate of ESWL in the treatment of kidney and ureteral stones in children referred to Hasheminejad kidney center during the second half of 2018. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This observational prospective study was conducted on 144 children referred to Hasheminejad kidney center during the 2018. The patients were selected using the convenience sampling method. The study was investigating the success rate of ESWL in the treatment of kidney and ureteral stones and effective factors in this regard. RESULTS: A total of 133 patients (92.4%) had stone passage and 37.5% of patients had residual stones, 28.5% of which were less than 5 mm in diameter. Successful results were seen in 131 cases (91%). Successful results were significantly higher in males (p = 0.011) and lower in simultaneous stones in the middle calyx and lower calyx (p = 0.0001). CONCLUSION: According to the results of this study, it can be inferred that ESWL success rate was above 90% in the treatment of kidney and ureteral stones in children in such a way that with an ESWL session in patients who have been properly selected for this procedure, a success rate of about 62.5% will be available to remove any residual fragments, and nearly 28.5% have residual fragments with a diameter of smaller than 5 mm, which is basically hopeful for a high urinary passage. The present study shows that type and stone location are the factors contributing to the successful ESWL and shows the female gender and the presence of stone in the lower and middle calyx are the risk factors for the lower ESWL success rate.

Percutaneous management of caliceal diverticula: a narrative review.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Caliceal diverticula are relatively uncommon within urologic practice and may be difficult to diagnose and treat. We aim to highlight contemporary studies examining surgical interventions for patients with caliceal diverticula, with a focus on percutaneous intervention, and provide updated practical recommendations for the management of these patients. RECENT FINDINGS: Studies within the last 3 years examining surgical treatment options for caliceal diverticular calculi are limited. When flexible ureteroscopy (f-URS) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) are examined within the same observational cohorts, PCNL is associated with improved stone-free rates (SFRs), lower requirement for re-intervention, and longer lengths of stay (LOS). Retrograde f-URS for the treatment of caliceal diverticula and diverticular calculi is associated with satisfactory safety and efficacy outcomes. There are no studies in the last 3 years that provide supporting evidence to use shock wave lithotripsy to treat caliceal diverticular calculi. SUMMARY: Recent studies examining surgical interventions for patients with caliceal diverticula are limited to small observational studies. Heterogeneity in LOS and follow-up protocol limits comparisons between series. Despite technological advancements in f-URS, PCNL appears to be associated with more favorable and definitive outcomes. PCNL continues to be the preferred treatment strategy for patients with symptomatic caliceal diverticula when deemed technically feasible.

Feasibility of multi-section continuum robotic ureteroscope in the kidney.

Our objective was to evaluate the feasibility of a multi-section continuum robotic ureteroscope to address the difficulties with access into certain renal calyces during flexible ureteroscopy. First, the robotic ureteroscope developed in previous research, which utilizes three actuated bendable sections controlled by wires, was modified for use in this project. Second, using phantom models created from five randomly selected computer tomography urograms, the flexible ureteroscope and robotic ureteroscope were evaluated, focusing on several factors: time taken to access each renal calyx, time taken to aim at three targets on each renal calyx, the force generated in the renal pelvic wall associated with ureteroscope manipulation, and the distance and standard deviation between the ureteroscope and the target. As a result, the robotic ureteroscope utilized significantly less force during lower pole calyx access (flexible ureteroscope vs. robotic ureteroscope; 2.0 vs. 0.98 N, p = 0.03). When aiming at targets, the standard deviation of proper target access was smaller for each renal calyx (upper pole: 0.49 vs. 0.11 mm, middle: 0.84 vs. 0.12 mm, lower pole: 3.4 vs. 0.19 mm) in the robotic ureteroscope group, and the distance between the center point of the ureteroscope image and the target was significantly smaller in the robotic ureteroscope group (upper: 0.49 vs. 0.19 mm, p < 0.001, middle: 0.77 vs. 0.17 mm, p < 0.001, lower: 0.77 vs. 0.22 mm, p < 0.001). In conclusion, our robotic ureteroscope demonstrated improved maneuverability and facilitated accuracy and precision while reducing the force on the renal pelvic wall during access into each renal calyx.

Pelvicalyceal anatomy on the accessibility of reusable flexible ureteroscopy to lower pole calyx during retrograde intrarenal surgery.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the pelvicalyceal anatomy on accessibility of reusable flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) to the lower pole calyx during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). METHODS: Here, 854 patients with ureteral or kidney stones with access to a renal collecting system using reusable fURS were classified into either the accessible group, in whom the deepest lower pole calyces could be touched; and the inaccessible group, in whom the deepest lower calyces could not be touched. We measured the infundibulopelvic angle (IPA), infundibular width (IW), infundibular length (IL), and calyceal pelvic height (CPH) using retrograde pyelograms and performed intergroup comparisons. RESULTS: The median IPA, IW, IL, and CPH in the accessible and inaccessible group were 60.5° and 45.6° (p < 0.001), 10.8 and 9.4 mm (p < 0.001), 33.2 and 36.4 mm (p < 0.001), and 25.9 and 30.9 mm (p < 0.001), respectively. IPA (OR 0.963, 95% CI 0.952-0.974, p < 0.001) and IW (OR 0.519, 95% CI 0.331-0.816, p = 0.004) were significant risk factors of renal pelvicalyceal anatomy related to the accessibility of the lower pole calyces. The cut-off value for IPA and IW was 45.8°(p < 0.001) and 7.8 mm (p < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: IPA < 45.8° and IW <7.8 mm were negative predictors to access the lower pole calyces when using reusable fURS during RIRS.

[Complications of retrograde intrarenal sugery in patients with low pole kidney stones].

A lot of patients with nephrolithiasis have calculi at low pole calyces. One of the best and safety operative options of such category is retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). RIRS is wide spread in current clinical practice. But not rarely it corresponded with different grade complications. Current literature review is dedicated to predictors of complications due to RIRS in patients with low pole calculi.