Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 68
Filter
1.
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed ; 40(1): e12935, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38018017

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Photobiomodulation therapy (PBM) is a versatile technique for treating skin diseases. Melasma, a chronic hyperpigmentation condition, has recently been associated with vascular features and dermal photoaging and poses significant management challenges. We review the recent literature on melasma etiology and the evidence supporting PBM as a therapeutic modality for melasma treatment. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive literature search in three different databases from May to August 2023, focusing on studies published in the past 10 years. The inclusion criteria comprised full-text studies investigating low-power lasers and/or light-emitting diodes (LEDs) in in vitro or in vivo models, as well as clinical trials. We excluded studies discussing alternative melasma therapies or lacking experimental data. We identified additional studies by searching the reference lists of the selected articles. RESULTS: We identified nine relevant studies. Clinical studies, in agreement with in vitro experiments and animal models, suggest that PBM effectively reduces melasma-associated hyperpigmentation. Specific wavelengths (red: 630 nm; amber: 585 and 590 nm; infrared: 830 and 850 nm) at radiant exposures between 1 and 20 J/cm2 exert modulatory effects on tyrosinase activity, gene expression, and protein synthesis of melanocytic pathway components, and thus significantly reduce the melanin content. Additionally, PBM is effective in improving the dermal structure and reducing erythema and neovascularization, features recently identified as pathological components of melasma. CONCLUSION: PBM emerges as a promising, contemporary, and non-invasive procedure for treating melasma. Beyond its role in inhibiting melanogenesis, PBM shows potential in reducing erythema and vascularization and improving dermal conditions. However, robust and well-designed clinical trials are needed to determine optimal light parameters and to evaluate the effects of PBM on melasma thoroughly.


Subject(s)
Hyperpigmentation , Low-Level Light Therapy , Melanosis , Animals , Low-Level Light Therapy/adverse effects , Melanosis/radiotherapy , Melanosis/complications , Lasers , Erythema/etiology
2.
Lasers Med Sci ; 39(1): 14, 2023 Dec 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38135711

ABSTRACT

Facial filling is widespread in society, albeit associated with inherent risks. This review analyzes clinical studies using laser therapy for filler complications to assess its safety and efficacy as an alternative treatment. A literature search was conducted up until April 2023, encompassing five different databases: PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and Medline, to find clinical trials addressing patients who underwent laser treatment for adverse reactions to injectable facial filling. The outcome variables were the clinical assessment of the lesion and the occurrence of post-intervention complications/sequelae. The risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. In total, six studies were included, all classified as having a "moderate risk" of bias. A total of 533 patients underwent laser treatment for adverse reactions to injectable facial fillers. The diode laser was the most frequently utilized equipment, with positive results reported in five studies. Among all treated patients, 96.24% achieved partial or complete resolution, 0.22% experienced some sequelae or complications, and only 0.01% showed no improvement. Laser treatment can eliminate the necessity for surgical intervention for adverse reactions to injectable facial fillers, resulting in partial or complete improvement of the condition.


Subject(s)
Laser Therapy , Low-Level Light Therapy , Humans , Laser Therapy/methods , Low-Level Light Therapy/adverse effects , Lasers
3.
Support Care Cancer ; 31(12): 645, 2023 Oct 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37853254

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of photobiomodulation in the treatment of oral mucositis. METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis encompassing in the electronic databases: LILACS, MEDLINE, EMBASE, COCHRANE, SCOPUS, WEB OF SCIENCE, and CINAHL and in http://clinicaltrials.gov . Eligibility criteria were randomized, non-randomized, and observational studies that used photobiomodulation for the treatment of oral mucositis. The endpoints were reduction in the severity of oral mucositis, duration of lesions, and pain reduction. For data analysis, the Review Manager 5.4 program was used. RESULTS: A total of 316 studies were identified, 297 in the electronic databases and 19 in http://clinicaltrials.gov . After removing duplicates, 260 studies were selected for title and abstract reading, of which 223 were excluded. A total of 37 studies were chosen for full reading, of which 6 were included in the review, totaling 299 patients. The treatment used was photobiomodulation. The patients were divided into two groups: the laser group used only photobiomodulation or associated with other therapies, and the control group did not use photobiomodulation. For the endpoint reduction in the severity of oral mucositis (OM), the chance of reduction of the OM was greater in the laser group as compared to the control group. For the endpoints duration of OM lesions and pain reduction, it was not possible to carry out a meta-analysis due to the high heterogeneity between studies. In the interpretation of the meta-analysis, the reduction in the severity of oral mucositis was greater in the group that received photobiomodulation. CONCLUSION: Photobiomodulation was effective in the treatment of oral mucositis.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , Low-Level Light Therapy , Oral Ulcer , Stomatitis , Humans , Low-Level Light Therapy/adverse effects , Stomatitis/drug therapy , Stomatitis/etiology , Stomatitis/pathology , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Pain/etiology
4.
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther ; 42: 103543, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37003595

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of photobiomodulation and antimicrobial photodynamic therapy in the treatment of oral mucositis. BACKGROUND: Oral Mucositis is a frequent complication of oral cavity and oropharynx cancer. Considering the OM aggravation by microorganisms contamination, disinfection provide by antimicrobial photodynamic therapy could be an effective approach. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This comparative study included fourteen patients undergoing radiochemotherapy for oral cavity and oropharynx cancer treatment, who developed oral mucositis. CONTROL GROUP: photobiomodulation. Intervention group: photobiomodulation and antimicrobial photodynamic therapy. The lesion size, duration, pain, and identification of microorganisms were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean reduction in oral mucositis size in the intervention group was 0.70 cm² (±0.35) and 0.30 cm² (±1.10) for the control group. The mean duration of oral mucositis was 18.37 days (±12.12) for the intervention group and 23 days (±14.78) for the control group. The intervention group had a mean reduction of 3.40 points on the pain scale (±2.44), while the control group had 0.17 (±2.28). In the intervention group, the predominant isolated microbiota was featured as mixed culture (n = 4/ 50%), followed of Gram Positive (n = 3/ 37.50%), and Gram Negative (n = 1/ 12.55%). In the control group, mixed culture was also more frequent (n = 4 / 66%), followed by Gram Positive (n = 2 /34%). Gram Negative was not predominantly isolated in the control group. CONCLUSION: No statistical significance was found between PBM-T alone and PBM-T + PDT. However, the better outcomes reached by PBM-T + PDT group would suggest there could be a role for combined treatment in the management of OM lesions.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents , Low-Level Light Therapy , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms , Photochemotherapy , Stomatitis , Humans , Photochemotherapy/methods , Photosensitizing Agents/therapeutic use , Stomatitis/etiology , Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use , Low-Level Light Therapy/adverse effects , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/complications , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/drug therapy
5.
J Oral Pathol Med ; 52(5): 365-371, 2023 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36691842

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The effects of laser therapy on normal cells are well known and accepted, but the impact of this therapy on malignant cells are not yet fully understood. This review aims to map and outline what the scientific literature addresses on the effects of laser therapy on malignant cells. METHODS: This review article followed the guidelines of the PRISMA-ScR protocol, being all the search, analysis, and selection of articles based on it. RESULTS: After all application of the predetermined criteria, five studies were included, dated between the years 2013 and 2021. With the complete reading of the selected studies, 100% of the articles were classified as category III of the Agency for Healthcare as Research and Quality classification. Similar themes among the papers included were investigated and compared. In these five studies, the visible red and near infrared wavelengths were used, and energy densities varied between 1 and 5 J/cm2 . It was observed that low-level laser could alter the expression of cell proliferation and migration proteins, such as cyclin D1, E-cadherin, and ß-catenin. In addition, changes related to increased cell viability and metabolism were also identified. CONCLUSION: The low-level laser seems to positively regulate the proliferative, migratory, and viability capacity of neoplastic cells, depending on the protocol used. All these studies included in the review are equivalent to in vitro studies; the cells are not in such a complex environment as is an organized tissue, making it necessary to carry out more complex tests, such as in vivo research.


Subject(s)
Low-Level Light Therapy , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms , Humans , Lasers , Cells, Cultured , Cell Proliferation , Cell Survival , Low-Level Light Therapy/adverse effects , Low-Level Light Therapy/methods
6.
Lasers Med Sci ; 37(8): 3155-3167, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35648258

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to compare shoulder tendinopathy treatment with therapeutic ultrasound combined with LED photobiomodulation therapy using LED-infrared (850 nm) or LED-red (640 nm). The study assessed 75 patients, aged 45 to 70 years, distributed into five experimental groups (15 patients each): therapeutic ultrasound (US), infrared light irradiation (IR), visible red light irradiation (VR), infrared light and ultrasound combined (IR-US), and red light in conjunction with ultrasound (VR-US). The ultrasound parameters are 1 MHz, 0.5 W/cm2 (SATA), and 100 Hz repetition rate, applied for 4 min each session. LED irradiation protocols were as follows: 3 points, 7.5 J per point, IR-LED 750 mW, 10 s, VR-LED 250 mW, 30 s. LED irradiation is followed by ultrasound in the combined therapies. The efficiency of the five therapies was evaluated assessing 12 parameters: quality of life (Health Assessment Questionnaire, HAQ), pain intensity (Visual Analog Scale, VAS), articular amplitude of shoulder movement (flexion, extension, abduction, adduction, medial rotation, lateral rotation), muscle strength (abduction, lateral rotation), and electromyography (lateral rotation, abduction). Treatments comprised 12 sessions for 4 weeks. Intra-group analysis showed that the five therapies significantly improved the recovery of all parameters after treatment. Regarding the comparison of irradiated therapies and ultrasound, statistical analysis showed that IR-US was a better treatment than US for all 12 parameters. IR treatment exceeded US on 9 items, whereas that VR and VR-US therapies exceeded US in 7 and 10 parameters, respectively (p < 0.05). Because of that, IR-US shows to be the best treatment for rotator cuff tendinopathy. In conclusion, improvements in quality of life, pain intensity relief, shoulder amplitude motion, and muscle strength force obtained with ultrasound therapy are enhanced by adding infrared LED irradiation to ultrasound for patients suffering from rotator cuff tendinopathy. This study was registered with the Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials (ReBEC) under Universal Trial Number (UTN) U1111-1219-3594 (2018/22/08).


Subject(s)
Low-Level Light Therapy , Tendinopathy , Humans , Low-Level Light Therapy/adverse effects , Quality of Life , Range of Motion, Articular , Rotator Cuff/diagnostic imaging , Shoulder Pain/therapy , Tendinopathy/diagnostic imaging , Tendinopathy/radiotherapy , Treatment Outcome
7.
Dermatol Ther ; 35(7): e15519, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35426222

ABSTRACT

Labial lentigines associated with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome are challenging and represent a cosmetic problem. Laser and intense-pulsed light sources (IPLS) can be used to treat these macules. However, there are few guidelines regarding the different types of protocols found in the literature. Thus, the purpose of this study was to review the pertinent literature on lasers and IPLS as therapy for labial lentigines in patients with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome. A detailed literature search was conducted in seven databases (Cochrane Library, Embase, Lilacs, PubMed, SciELO, Scopus and Web of Science) to November 2020. Data were extracted and analyzed from selected studies including study design, sample size, participants' skin color, age, and gender, parameters of the laser or IPLS used, interval and total sessions of laser application, results obtained, follow-up time and side effects. Thirteen out of 124 published studies met our eligibility criteria, covering 81 patients. Ten types of lasers and IPLS were used, and most of the sample (n = 57) was treated with Q-switch Alexandrite Laser (QSAL). The total number of sessions ranged from 1 to 12 and the interval between sessions ranged from 2 to 16 weeks. All studies have shown satisfactory results, with no further complications. The follow-up ranged from 2 to 97 months. Laser therapy and IPLS are effective in the treatment of lentigines associated with PJS. Although QSAL was used in 70.3% of the sample, different types of lasers showed comparable satisfactory results.


Subject(s)
Laser Therapy , Lentigo , Lip Diseases , Low-Level Light Therapy , Melanosis , Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome , Humans , Lentigo/radiotherapy , Low-Level Light Therapy/adverse effects , Low-Level Light Therapy/methods , Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome/complications , Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome/diagnosis , Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome/radiotherapy
8.
Lasers Med Sci ; 37(2): 1235-1244, 2022 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34297266

ABSTRACT

Investigate the effects of low-level lasers therapy (LLLT) aiming abdominal lipolysis. Female Wistar rats received applications of LLLT directly in the abdominal skin twice a week (5 weeks). Except the control group (n = 5), animals received treatments with red wavelength 660 nm being (I) R3.3 group (n = 5): 3.3 J/cm2, and (II) R5 group (n = 5): 5 J/cm2, or infrared wavelength 808 nm being (III) IR3.3 group (n = 5): 3.3 J/cm2, and (IV) IR5 group (n = 5): 5 J/cm2. Abdominal subcutaneous and liver tissues were evaluated histologically. Levels of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) and catalase (CAT) activity were analyzed in liver tissue. In the peripheral blood aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), triglycerides, and total cholesterol were investigated. Micronucleus assay was performed in the bone marrow. Except for the IR3.3 group, all treated groups reduced the body weight (p < 0.001). The R5 group reduced the abdominal subcutaneous tissue weight and thickness (p < 0.05), even though all treated groups reduced the number of adipocytes and its size (p < 0.001). No histological changes in the liver. There were no alterations in the triglycerides and LDL levels. The IR5 group increased the total cholesterol levels and decreased the HDL, ALT (both p < 0.05), and AST levels (p < 0.001). The group IR3.3 showed higher levels of ALP (p < 0.01). The R3.3 group increased the TBARS and CAT activity (p < 0.05). No mutagenic effects were found. The red laser treatment at 5 J/cm2 led to lipolysis and did not alter the liver's parameters.


Subject(s)
Low-Level Light Therapy , Animals , Aspartate Aminotransferases/metabolism , Aspartate Aminotransferases/pharmacology , Female , Lipolysis , Liver/pathology , Low-Level Light Therapy/adverse effects , Rats , Rats, Wistar , Subcutaneous Tissue
9.
Rev. Salusvita (Online) ; 41(1): 140-152, 2022.
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-1526274

ABSTRACT

A fotobiomodulação sistêmica (FBM-S) consiste em uma técnica que utiliza o laser de baixa intensidade no espectro vermelho da luz para irradiação sistêmica. Seus benefícios incluem efeito analgésico, antioxidante sistêmico e anti-inflamatório, ativação de células imunológicas, melhora na cicatrização, vasodilatação e aumento da microcirculação. A técnica original, que utiliza cateter e fibra óptica para irradiação sistêmica, é uma técnica invasiva, por isso a fotobiomodulação sistêmica transdérmica foi desenvolvida como uma alternativa. Assim, o objetivo dessa revisão de literatura é discutir os efeitos, aplicações, protocolos e efeitos colaterais desta terapia modificada. Para tanto, foi realizada uma busca na literatura nas bases de dados Pubmed, Bireme, Embase, Scopus, Science Direct, Web of Science e CENTRAL, sem restrição de idioma no período entre 2010 e 2021. Encontraram-se seis estudos sendo um na área da Odontologia. Os resultados desses estudos sugerem que a FBS-S pode ser utilizada para o tratamento de condições sistêmicas. Em Odontologia, no entanto, a literatura ainda é escassa e mais estudos clínicos randomizados controlados são necessários para comprovar seus efeitos e estabelecer um protocolo clínico para sua utilização.


Systemic photobiomodulation (PBM-S) is a technique that uses low-level laser in the red spectrum of light for systemic irradiation. Its benefits include analgesic, systemic antioxi-dant, and anti-inflammatory effect, activation of immune cells, improved healing, vasodilation, and increased microcirculation. The original technique, which uses catheter and optical fibers for systemic irradiation is an invasive technique. Thus, the transdermal systemic photobiomodulation was developed as an alternative. The purpose of this literature review is to discuss the effects, applications, protocols, and side effects of this modified therapy. A literature search was carried out on Pubmed, Bireme, Embase, Scopus, Science Direct, Web of Science, and CENTRAL databases, with no language restriction in the period be-tween 2010 and 2021. Six studies were found, one in the area of Dentistry. The results of these studies suggest that PBM-S can be used for the treatment of systemic conditions. In Dentistry, however, the literature is still scarce and more randomized controlled clinical trials are needed to prove its effects and establish a protocol for its use.


Subject(s)
Low-Level Light Therapy/adverse effects , Administration, Cutaneous , Low-Level Light Therapy/standards , Infrared Rays/adverse effects
10.
Lasers Med Sci ; 36(3): 681-690, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32813258

ABSTRACT

Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is the most common head and neck malignancy; it has been shown that cancer stem cells (CSC) are present in OSCC and associated with tumor growth, invasion, metastasis, and therapeutic resistance. Photobiomodulation (PBM) is an alternative tool for oncologic treatment adverse effects such as oral mucositis (OM); however, controversy exists regarding the undesirable effects of PBM on tumor or CSC. This study aimed to evaluate in vitro, the effects of PBM, with the same dosimetric parameters as those used in the clinic for OM prevention and treatment, on OSCC cellular viability, as well as PBM's effect on CSC properties and its phenotype. OSCC cell lines were submitted to single or daily PBM with 3 J/cm2 and 6 J/cm2 and then the cellular viability was evaluated by MTT, NRU (neutral red uptake), and CVS (crystal violet staining). The CSC populations were evaluated by clonogenic formation assay, flow cytometry, and RT-qPCR. The single PBM with the 3 J/cm2 group was associated with increased cellular viability. Daily PBM with 3 J/cm2 and 6 J/cm2 was associated with a significant decrease in cellular viability. Additionally, daily PBM was not able to promote CSC self-renewal or the CD44high/ESAlow and CD44high/ESAhigh cellular phenotypes. Moreover, a decrease in the number of spheres and in the expression of the CSC related gene BMI1 was observed after daily PBM with 6 J/cm2. Daily PBM with 3 J/cm2 and 6 J/cm2 showed an inhibitory effect on cellular viability and was not able to promote the CSC self-renewal or phenotype.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/radiotherapy , Low-Level Light Therapy , Mouth Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Neoplastic Stem Cells/pathology , Neoplastic Stem Cells/radiation effects , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Survival/radiation effects , Colony-Forming Units Assay , Humans , Low-Level Light Therapy/adverse effects , Mouth Neoplasms/pathology , Phenotype
11.
Trials ; 20(1): 200, 2019 Apr 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30954086

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Temporomandibular disorder (TMD) is the most common cause of orofacial and cervical skull pain and is considered to be a public health problem, affecting 5% to 12% of the world population. TMD is multifactorial and there are several types of treatment, with the conservative types being indicated more often as they are less aggressive and reversible. The main aim of these treatments is to relieve symptoms, reduce of pain, and restore orofacial and cervical skull functions. Photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT), a noninvasive therapy, is an option for the management of musculoskeletal disorders due to its analgesic, anti-inflammatory, and regenerative effects. METHODS: The aim of the proposed study is to verify whether PBMT is effective for use in palliative care of TMD and orofacial and cervical skull pain. A randomized, triple-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial is proposed. This study will involve 200 adult participants (over 18 years of age) who will be randomly divided into two groups (n = 100): Group 1, active treatment (PBMT); and Group 2, placebo. Participants will be subjected to three sessions of PBMT or placebo and will be evaluated using the research diagnostic criteria (RDC) for TMD. Pain level (measured by a visual analog scale (VAS)), mandibular movements (measured by ruler and caliper), quality of life (measured by the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP)-14), and quality of sleep (measured by the Epworth scale) will be recorded. This study is being conducted at the Special Laboratory of Lasers in Dentistry (LELO) of the School of Dentistry of the University of Sao Paulo (USP). DISCUSSION: This study will verify whether PBMT is effective in reducing TMD and orofacial and cervical skull pain. PBMT may be an option for the management of musculoskeletal disorders due to its analgesic, anti-inflammatory, and regenerative effects, in addition to being a noninvasive technique. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registro Brasileiro de Ensaios Clínicos, RBR-9b6mnj . Registered on 27 March 2018. Trial registry name: Laser de baixa potência no cuidado paliativo da disfunção temporomandibular e dor crânio orofacial e cervical. Ethics committee: #1774930 approved on 14 October 2016.


Subject(s)
Facial Pain/radiotherapy , Low-Level Light Therapy , Neck Pain/radiotherapy , Palliative Care/methods , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/radiotherapy , Brazil , Facial Pain/diagnosis , Facial Pain/physiopathology , Female , Humans , Low-Level Light Therapy/adverse effects , Male , Neck Pain/diagnosis , Neck Pain/physiopathology , Pain Measurement , Quality of Life , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Sleep , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/diagnosis , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/physiopathology , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
12.
Trials ; 20(1): 97, 2019 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30709370

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Oral mucositis (OM) is the most frequent and debilitating acute side effect associated with head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment. When present, severe OM negatively impacts the quality of life of patients undergoing HNC treatment. Photobiomodulation is a well-consolidated and effective therapy for the treatment and prevention of severe OM, and is associated with a cost reduction of the cancer treatment. Although an increase in the quality of life and a reduction in the severity of OM are well described, there is no study on cost-effectiveness for this approach considering the quality of life as a primary outcome. In addition, little is known about the photobiomodulation effects on salivary inflammatory mediators. Thus, this study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of the photobiomodulation therapy for the prevention and control of severe OM and its influence on the salivary inflammatory mediators. METHODS/DESIGN: This randomized, double-blind clinical trial will include 50 HNC patients undergoing radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. The participants will be randomized into two groups: intervention group (photobiomodulation) and control group (preventive oral care protocol). OM (clinical assessment), saliva (assessment of collected samples) and quality of life (Oral Health Impact Profile-14 and Patient-Reported Oral Mucositis Symptoms questionnaires) will be assessed at the 1st, 7th, 14th, 21st and 30th radiotherapy sessions. Oxidative stress and inflammatory cytokine levels will be measured in the saliva samples of all participants. The costs are identified, measured and evaluated considering the radiotherapy time interval. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio will be estimated. The study will be conducted according to the Brazilian public health system perspective. DISCUSSION: Photobiomodulation is an effective therapy that reduces the cost associated with OM treatment. However, little is known about its cost-effectiveness, mainly when quality of life is the effectiveness measure. Additionally, this therapy is not supported by the Brazilian public health system. Therefore, this study widens the knowledge about the safety of and strengthens evidence for the use of photobiomodulation therapy, providing information for public policy-makers and also for dental care professionals. This study is strongly encouraged due to its clinical relevance and the possibility of incorporating new technology into public health systems. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials-ReBEC, RBR-5h4y4n . Registered on 13 June 2017.


Subject(s)
Chemoradiotherapy/adverse effects , Cranial Irradiation/adverse effects , Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Low-Level Light Therapy/methods , Radiation Injuries/prevention & control , Salivary Glands/radiation effects , Stomatitis/prevention & control , Biomarkers/metabolism , Brazil , Chemoradiotherapy/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Cranial Irradiation/economics , Cytokines/metabolism , Double-Blind Method , Head and Neck Neoplasms/economics , Health Care Costs , Humans , Inflammation Mediators/metabolism , Low-Level Light Therapy/adverse effects , Low-Level Light Therapy/economics , Oxidative Stress , Radiation Injuries/economics , Radiation Injuries/etiology , Radiation Injuries/metabolism , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Risk Factors , Saliva/metabolism , Salivary Glands/metabolism , Severity of Illness Index , Stomatitis/economics , Stomatitis/etiology , Stomatitis/metabolism , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
13.
Lasers Med Sci ; 34(6): 1053-1062, 2019 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30729351

ABSTRACT

Review effectiveness of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in the curative treatment of oral mucositis (OM) in patients receiving cancer therapy. A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed using Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases according to PRISMA guidelines, to identify randomized controlled trials (RCT) on OM in patients during and/or after cancer therapy and in which the therapeutic approach was LLLT, with wavelengths between 632 and 970 nm. We considered grade of OM as a dichotomous variable (such as an improvement or not in severe OM on the seventh day of therapy), with the analysis of subgroups of adult patients or children and adolescents and as a continuous variable with determination of the time for the complete resolution and the subgroup analysis occurred with the strata of the samples by treatment only with chemotherapy or chemotherapy and radiotherapy. This paper's protocol was registered a priori at https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO . We found five RCT (total of 315 patients) with adequate methodology. LLLT was effective, presenting a 62% risk reduction of severe mucositis on the seventh day of evaluation (RR = 0.38 [95% CI, 0.19-0.75]). When we analyzed subgroups, RR was 0.28 (95% CI 0.17-0.46) in the adult studies and 0.90 (95% CI, 0.46-1.78) in the studies with children and adolescents. We demonstrated a mean reduction of 4.21 days in the time of complete resolution of OM (CI - 5.65 to - 2.76) in favor of LLLT. There is moderate evidence that LLLT is effective in resolving OM lesions in adult patients undergoing cancer therapy. LLLT demonstrates potential for decreasing the resolution time of OM lesions by approximately 4.21 days.


Subject(s)
Low-Level Light Therapy , Mouth Neoplasms/complications , Mouth Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Stomatitis/complications , Stomatitis/radiotherapy , Adult , Child , Humans , Low-Level Light Therapy/adverse effects , Mouth Neoplasms/pathology , Pain Management , Publication Bias , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Stomatitis/pathology , Treatment Outcome
14.
Eur J Appl Physiol ; 119(1): 279-289, 2019 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30367258

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) combined with resistance training on knee extensors muscle mass, strength and functional capacity in elderly men. METHODS: In this randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled trial, healthy elderly men (age 60-80 years) completed 12 weeks of resistance training (2×/week) with application of placebo (n = 13) or active PBMT (n = 11) on quadriceps muscles (850 nm, 240 J per limb) before each training session. Leg press and knee extension one-repetition maximum (1RM) tests, isometric and concentric peak torques, rectus femoris (RF) and vastus lateralis (VL) muscle thickness, timed up-and-go (TUG) and chair rise-to-standing (CRS) tests were performed before and after the intervention period. RESULTS: There were significant improvements in all outcomes for both groups (p < 0.05), except for RF muscle thickness for the placebo group (p = 0.09). Large effect sizes (ES > 0.8) were observed for leg press and leg extension 1RM and CRS tests for both groups, as well as for TUG test for PBMT group. Isokinetic peak torque for both groups and TUG for placebo group had moderate increases (ES > 0.5). Muscle thicknesses and isometric peak torque had small increases (ES > 0.2) in both groups. Both null hypothesis analysis and magnitude-based inference support similar effects of PBMT and placebo treatments. CONCLUSION: Different than previously evidenced in young subjects, PBMT with the parameters used in this study did not provide any additional benefits in comparison to placebo application on muscle mass, strength and functional capacity of healthy elderly men engaged in a resistance training program.


Subject(s)
Low-Level Light Therapy/methods , Muscle, Skeletal/physiology , Resistance Training/methods , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Humans , Knee/physiology , Low-Level Light Therapy/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Muscle Strength , Muscle, Skeletal/radiation effects
15.
São José dos Campos; s.n; 2019. 58 p. il., tab., graf..
Thesis in Portuguese | BBO - Dentistry | ID: biblio-1017085

ABSTRACT

O desequilíbrio no Sistema Estomatognático pode levar a alterações em funções vitais, como a mastigação, deglutição e fonação. Essa ultrapassagem da tolerância fisiológica do indivíduo, pode desenvolver uma patologia conhecida como Disfunção Temporomandibular (DTM). O paciente pode apresentar dor nos músculos da mastigação e/ou nas articulações temporomandibulares (ATM) e pode estar associado a outras estruturas. A DTM é a principal causa de dor não dental na região orofacial, sendo esse sintoma a principal busca pelo tratamento, que abrange um grande número de recursos, incluindo fármacos, psicoterapia, eletroterapia, mobilização articular, entre outros. Mas uma técnica que tem ganhado destaque é o laser de baixa intensidade (LBI). Pois possuí efeitos antinflamatórios e antiálgicos. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a eficácia do LBI em pacientes com DTM muscular. Para tal, uma amostra de 139 pacientes foi recrutada para a avaliação dos critérios de elegibilidade. A amostra final foi composta por 21 pacientes, os quais obedeceram aos critérios de inclusão e foram randomicamente alocados nos grupos de tratamento laser e placebo. Os pacientes foram tratados com o laser AsGaAl pontual de 808nm (100 mW/ 8 segundos ­ 30 J/cm²) com a aplicação sobre os pontos gatilhos dos músculos masseter e temporal anterior, em 8 sessões (2 vezes por semana). Os testes de Friedman, teste de Dunn e teste de Mann-Whitney com nível de significância de 5% (p<0.05) foram considerados. Os resultados obtidos mostraram que houve uma diferença estatisticamente significativa (p<0.05) ao avaliar a EVA (Escala Visual Analógica) pré e pós tratamento em ambos os grupos de tratamento, mas na comparação LBI com o placebo não houve diferença estatística significativa. Pode-se concluir que o tratamento a laser não é superior ao placebo(AU)


Imbalance in the Stomatognathic System can lead to changes in vital functions such as chewing, swallowing and phonation. This overcoming of the individual's physiological tolerance may develop a condition known as Temporomandibular Dysfunction (TMD). The patient may present pain in the chewing muscles and / or in the temporomandibular joints (TMJ) and may be associated with other structures. TMD is the main cause of non-dental pain in the orofacial region, and this symptom is the main search for treatment, which covers a large number of resources, including drugs, psychotherapy, electrotherapy, joint mobilization, among others. But one technique that has gained prominence is the low intensity laser (LBI). Because it has antiinflammatory and analgesic effects. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of LBI in patients with muscular TMD. To that end, a sample of 139 patients was recruited for the evaluation of the eligibility criteria. The final sample consisted of 21 patients, who met the inclusion criteria and were randomly assigned to the laser and placebo treatment groups. Patients were treated with the 808nm spot laser (100 mW / 8 seconds - 30J / cm²) with application on the trigger points of the masseter and anterior temporal muscles, in 8 sessions (2 times per week). Friedman's tests, Dunn's test and Mann-Whitney test with significance level of 5% (p <0.05) were considered. The results showed that there was a statistically significant difference (p <0.05) when evaluating VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) before and after treatment in both treatment groups, but in LBI comparison with placebo there was no significant statistical difference. It can be concluded that the laser treatment is not superior to placebo(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Low-Level Light Therapy/adverse effects , Placebos/classification , Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction Syndrome , Myofascial Pain Syndromes/classification
16.
Photomed Laser Surg ; 36(10): 536-540, 2018 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30251923

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Photobiomodulation (PBM) has been studied mainly for its effects on the repair, regeneration, and healing of tissue due to its direct and indirect actions on cell proliferation. However, it is necessary to consider the way in which laser acts, that is, whether it affects the rates of spontaneous mutation and mitotic recombination of cells. OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the genotoxic potential of PBM (904 nm) based on an in vivo bioassay that concomitantly evaluates mitotic recombination and point and chromosomal mutations. METHODS: Strains of Drosophila melanogaster that carry specific marker genes were used to detect the induction of mutation and somatic recombination when exposed to different fluences (3, 5, 10, and 20 J/cm2). DNA damage was measured using the somatic mutation and recombination test (SMART), which is based on the identification of wing hair with mutant phenotypes that express lesions at DNA level. RESULTS: The doses 5, 10, and 20 J/cm2 induced significant increase in the total number of spots compared with the negative control. The highest frequency of spots was caused by the 10 J/cm2. CONCLUSIONS: Besides recombination events, the quantitative and qualitative analysis of mutant hairs revealed the occurrence of mutagenic events, both punctual and chromosomal. In addition, the results point to a dose-dependent response.


Subject(s)
DNA Damage/radiation effects , Low-Level Light Therapy/adverse effects , Mutation/radiation effects , Recombination, Genetic/radiation effects , Animals , Drosophila melanogaster , Mutagenicity Tests
17.
Implant Dent ; 27(5): 547-554, 2018 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30059390

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the bone formed after maxillary sinus floor augmentation (MSFA) by bone autografting combined with hydroxyapatite (HA) that had been either treated with low-level laser therapy (LLLT) or not. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve biopsies were obtained from patients 6 months after MSFA using a combination of 50% of autogenous bone (AB) and 50% of HA (AB/HA group, n = 6) followed by LLLT (AB/HA-LLLT group, n = 6). The laser used in this study was gallium-aluminium-arsenide laser with a wavelength of 830 nm (40 mW; 5.32 J/point; 0.57 W/cm). Samples obtained were subjected to histological, histometric, and immunohistochemical analysis for detection of tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase and runt-related transcription factor 2. The data were submitted to statistical analysis (Shapiro-Wilk and Student t tests; α = 5%). RESULTS: Statistical analysis revealed no significant difference in vital bone presence and immunohistochemical analysis between the groups. There was no reduction in bone marrow or fibrous tissue in the AB/HA group and AB/HA-LLLT group. There was a decrease in the amount of remaining biomaterial between the groups (P = 0.0081). CONCLUSION: LLLT did not increase the formation of new bone; instead, it accelerated the bone remodeling process.


Subject(s)
Bone Transplantation/methods , Durapatite/therapeutic use , Low-Level Light Therapy , Osteogenesis , Sinus Floor Augmentation/methods , Adult , Alveolar Process/pathology , Humans , Low-Level Light Therapy/adverse effects , Low-Level Light Therapy/methods , Middle Aged , Young Adult
18.
Trials ; 19(1): 372, 2018 Jul 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30001202

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Different methods are available for the treatment of venous ulcers. Most current approaches focus on a combination of topical and compressive therapy. Adjuvant low-level laser therapy may be helpful in lesions with a protracted healing course, but evidence for its use is still limited. This paper describes the protocol of a randomized controlled trial designed to compare the effect of adjuvant low-level laser therapy versus conventional venous ulcer tissue repair, evaluated by a nurse using clinical indicators from the Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC). METHODS/DESIGN: For this prospective randomized controlled trial, 40 adult patients of both sexes with active venous ulcers will be recruited. Subjects will be selected by the sealed-envelope method without any annotation or external identification that might refer to the type of study group. At the time of unblinding, a label with the description of the group to which the patient belongs (that is, control or intervention) will be found inside the envelope. Conventional treatment (topical medication and compressive therapy) will be offered to both groups. Additionally, the intervention group will receive adjuvant low-level laser therapy. All patients will be followed weekly until ulcer healing or for a maximum of 16 weeks. Evaluation of tissue repair will be based on 14 clinical indicators drawn from NOC for wound healing (secondary intention) and tissue integrity (skin and mucous membranes). The primary endpoint will be decreased wound size and scar formation. This laser therapy is expected to enhance the quality, speed, and effectiveness of the treatment of venous ulcers, a chronic condition. This should reduce associated costs to the health service and allow patients to resume their daily activities sooner. DISCUSSION: This randomized clinical trial will use a validated method to investigate the effect of a novel intervention for the treatment of venous ulcers. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03229330 . Registered on July 2017.


Subject(s)
Low-Level Light Therapy , Nursing Staff, Hospital , Standardized Nursing Terminology , Varicose Ulcer/nursing , Varicose Ulcer/radiotherapy , Activities of Daily Living , Brazil , Chronic Disease , Female , Humans , Low-Level Light Therapy/adverse effects , Male , Prospective Studies , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Recovery of Function , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Varicose Ulcer/diagnosis , Wound Healing
19.
Trials ; 19(1): 249, 2018 Apr 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29690927

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Photobiomodulation describes the use of red or near-infrared light to stimulate or regenerate tissue. It was discovered that near-infrared wavelengths (800-900 nm) and red (600 nm) light-emitting diodes (LED) are able to penetrate through the scalp and skull and have the potential to improve the subnormal cellular activity of compromised brain tissue. Different experimental and clinical studies were performed to test LED therapy for traumatic brain injury (TBI) with promising results. One of the proposals of this present study is to develop different approaches to maximize the positive effects of this therapy and improve the quality of life of TBI patients. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a double-blinded, randomized, controlled trial of patients with diffuse axonal injury (DAI) due to a severe TBI in an acute stage (less than 8 h). Thirty two patients will be randomized to active coil helmet and inactive coil (sham) groups in a 1:1 ratio. The protocol includes 18 sessions of transcranial LED stimulation (627 nm, 70 mW/cm2, 10 J/cm2) at four points of the frontal and parietal regions for 30 s each, totaling 120 s, three times per week for 6 weeks, lasting 30 min. Patients will be evaluated with the Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE) before stimulation and 1, 3, and 6 months after the first stimulation. The study hypotheses are as follows: (1) transcranial LED therapy (TCLT) will improve the cognitive function of DAI patients and (2) TCLT will promote beneficial hemodynamic changes in cerebral circulation. DISCUSSION: This study evaluates early and delayed effects of TCLT on the cognitive rehabilitation for DAI following severe acute TBI. There is a paucity of studies regarding the use of this therapy for cognitive improvement in TBI. There are some experimental studies and case series presenting interesting results for TBI cognitive improvement but no clinical trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03281759 . Registered on 13 September 2017.


Subject(s)
Brain Injuries, Traumatic/radiotherapy , Brain/radiation effects , Cognition/radiation effects , Diffuse Axonal Injury/radiotherapy , Lasers, Semiconductor/therapeutic use , Low-Level Light Therapy/instrumentation , Adolescent , Adult , Brain/blood supply , Brain/physiopathology , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/diagnosis , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/physiopathology , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/psychology , Brazil , Cerebrovascular Circulation/radiation effects , Diffuse Axonal Injury/diagnosis , Diffuse Axonal Injury/physiopathology , Diffuse Axonal Injury/psychology , Double-Blind Method , Female , Glasgow Coma Scale , Humans , Lasers, Semiconductor/adverse effects , Low-Level Light Therapy/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Neurologic Examination , Quality of Life , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Recovery of Function , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
20.
Rheumatol Int ; 38(5): 785-793, 2018 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29480363

ABSTRACT

This study evaluated the synergistic effects of ultrasound (US) and low-level laser therapy (LLLT) with or without therapeutic exercises (TE) in women with knee osteoarthritis. Forty-two Caucasian women with knee osteoarthritis were allocated into three groups: (1) the placebo group who did not perform TE, but the prototype without emitting light or ultrasonic waves was applied, (2) the US + LLLT group in which only the prototype was applied and (3) the TE + US + LLLT group that performed TE before the prototype was applied. However, 35 women completed the full clinical trial. Pressure pain thresholds (PPT) using an algometer and functional performance during the sit-to-stand test were carried out. The average PPT levels increased for US + LLLT (41 ± 9 to 54 ± 15 N, p < 0.01) and TE + US + LLLT (32 ± 8 to 45 ± 9 N, p < 0.01) groups. The number of sit-to-stands was significantly higher for all groups. However, the change between pre-treatment and post-treatment (delta value) was greater for the US + LLLT (4 ± 1) and TE + US + LLLT groups (5 ± 1) than for the placebo group (2 ± 1) with a significant intergroup difference (p < 0.05). This study showed reduced pain and increased physical functionality after 3 months of US + LLLT with and without TE.


Subject(s)
Arthralgia/radiotherapy , Knee Joint/radiation effects , Low-Level Light Therapy , Osteoarthritis, Knee/radiotherapy , Ultrasonic Therapy , Aged , Arthralgia/diagnosis , Arthralgia/physiopathology , Brazil , Combined Modality Therapy , Exercise Therapy , Female , Humans , Knee Joint/diagnostic imaging , Knee Joint/physiopathology , Low-Level Light Therapy/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Osteoarthritis, Knee/diagnosis , Osteoarthritis, Knee/physiopathology , Pain Measurement , Recovery of Function , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Ultrasonic Therapy/adverse effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL