Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 4.966
Filter
1.
Clin Oral Investig ; 28(8): 420, 2024 Jul 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38976020

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to provide visualized knowledge maps to show the evolving trends and key focal points of Class III malocclusion research through a comprehensive bibliometric analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Class III malocclusion research published between 2000 and 2023 was retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection. VOSviewer was utilized to count the citation and publication number of authors, institutions, countries and journals. Co-occurrence, co-citation, and cluster analyses and burst detection were conducted using CiteSpace. RESULTS: A total of 3,682 publications on Class III malocclusion were included in the bibliometric analysis. During 2000-2023, both the annual publication count and citation frequency exhibited a gradual upward trajectory, with a noticeable surge in recent years. In terms of production and citation counts of Class III malocclusion research, the core journal is the American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. Furthermore, apart from the primary keyword 'Class III malocclusion', 'orthognathic surgery' was identified as keyword with the most frequency. The cluster analysis of cited references reveals that the research focal points have shifted to 'skeletal anchorage' and 'surgery-first approach'. Furthermore, the burst detection identified 'quality of life' as a potential research hotspot since it has recently gained increasing scholarly attention. CONCLUSIONS: The current study provides scholars with the knowledge maps of evolving trends and prominent topics of Class III malocclusion research and a summary of research progress on various priorities during different periods. These findings are expected to provide a valuable guidance to facilitate the future research on Class III malocclusion.


Subject(s)
Bibliometrics , Malocclusion, Angle Class III , Humans , Dental Research
2.
BMJ Open ; 14(6): e084703, 2024 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38950988

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Orthodontic treatment using face mask protraction combined with an alternate rapid maxillary expansion and constriction/protraction face mask (Alt-RAMEC/PFM) protocol is effective in the early treatment of patients with class III malocclusion, but the stability of treatment outcomes represents a major concern. Previous studies have suggested that tonsillar hypertrophy can be a risk factor for class III malocclusion and tonsillectomy may prompt the normalisation of dentofacial growth. However, these studies had a low-to-moderate level of evidence. This study was designed to identify the impact of tonsillectomy before orthodontic treatment on the efficacy and stability of Alt-RAMEC/PFM protocols and the sleep quality and oral health in children with anterior crossbite and tonsillar hypertrophy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a two-arm, parallel-group, superiority cluster randomised controlled trial, with four clinics randomly assigned to the surgery-first arm and the orthodontic-first arm in a 1:1 ratio. The Alt-RAMEC protocol involves alternate activation and deactivation of the expander's jet screw over 6 weeks to stimulate maxillary suture distraction. Patients will be instructed to wear the PFM for a minimum of 14 hours per day. The primary outcomes are changes in Wits appraisal and the degree of maxillary advancement from baseline to the end of orthodontic treatment. Lateral cephalometric radiographs, polysomnography, Obstructive Sleep Apnoea-18 questionnaire and Oral Health Impact Profile-14 questionnaire will be traced, collected and measured. We will recruit 96 patients intofor the study. To assess differences, repeated multilevel linear mixed modelling analyses will be used. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been granted ethical approval by the Ethics Committee of the School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University (approval No. 2023-D10). Written informed consent will be obtained from the participants and their guardians. The results of the trial will be disseminated through academic conferences and journal publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2300078833.


Subject(s)
Hypertrophy , Malocclusion, Angle Class III , Palatal Expansion Technique , Palatine Tonsil , Tonsillectomy , Humans , Tonsillectomy/methods , Child , Malocclusion, Angle Class III/surgery , Malocclusion, Angle Class III/therapy , Palatine Tonsil/pathology , Palatine Tonsil/surgery , Female , Extraoral Traction Appliances , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Male , Treatment Outcome , Sleep Quality , Adolescent
3.
BMC Oral Health ; 24(1): 722, 2024 Jun 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38915000

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to investigate the changes occurring in the mandibular condyle by using mentoplate together with rapid maxillary expansion (MP-RME) treatment in the correction of skeletal class III relationship, using fractal analysis (FA). METHODS: The sample consisted of 30 individuals (8-11 years) diagnosed with skeletal Class III malocclusion who underwent MP-RME treatment. Archival records provided cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images taken at two intervals: before MP-RME treatment (T0) and after treatment (T1). The CBCT images were obtained using standardized settings to ensure consistency in image quality and resolution. The trabecular structures in the bilateral condyles at both T0 and T1 were analyzed using FA. The FA was performed on these condylar images using the Image J software. The region of interest (ROI) was carefully selected in the condyle to avoid overlapping with cortical bone, and the box-counting method was employed to calculate the fractal dimension (FD). Statistical analysis was conducted to compare the FD values between T0 and T1 and to evaluate gender differences. The statistical significance was determined using paired t-tests for intra-group comparisons and independent t-tests for inter-group comparisons, with a significance level set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: The analysis revealed no statistically significant differences in the trabecular structures of the condyles between T0 and T1 (p > 0.05). However, a significant gender difference was observed in FA values, with males exhibiting higher FA values in the left condyle compared to females at both T0 and T1 (p < 0.05). Specifically, the FA values in the left condyle increased from a mean of 1.09 ± 0.09 at T0 to 1.13 ± 0.08 at T1 in males, whereas in females, the FA values remained relatively stable with a mean of 1 ± 0.09 at T0 and 1.03 ± 0.11 at T1. CONCLUSION: The findings indicate that MP-RME therapy does not induce significant alterations in the trabecular structure of the mandibular condyle. These results suggest the treatment's safety concerning the structural integrity of the condyle, although the observed gender differences in FA values warrant further investigation.


Subject(s)
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography , Fractals , Malocclusion, Angle Class III , Mandibular Condyle , Palatal Expansion Technique , Humans , Mandibular Condyle/diagnostic imaging , Mandibular Condyle/pathology , Malocclusion, Angle Class III/diagnostic imaging , Malocclusion, Angle Class III/therapy , Female , Male , Child
4.
BMC Oral Health ; 24(1): 664, 2024 Jun 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38849789

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study aims to evaluate the prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic features among schoolchildren in the West Bank, Palestine. METHODS: A stratified cluster sample of 1278 schoolchildren (620 males, 658 females, mean age 12 years and 5 months (± 0.5)) were examined. Candidates who had not received any previous orthodontic treatment were only included. Dental anomalies like missing and ectopic teeth were recorded. The anteroposterior occlusal relationship was assessed based on Angle classification. Overjet and overbite were measured. Crowding and spacing were recorded subjectively. In addition, crossbite, openbite, and midline displacement were recorded. The chi-square test and descriptive analysis were used statistically. RESULTS: The study found Angle Class I molar relationship in 65%, Class II div 1 in 17%, Class II div 2 in 6%, and Class III in 12% of the sample. An overjet (OJ) of more than 4 mm was present in 17%, and 4% had OJ of more than 6 mm; an OJ of at least 0 mm or less in 36%, and 6% had a reverse OJ. A normal overbite was observed in 53%, while 28% had an increase and 19% had a decreased overbite. An anterior openbite (AOB) was present in 9%, and a scissor bite or anterior crossbite in 6% and 14%, respectively. A posterior crossbite was observed in 12% (9% unilateral and 3% bilateral). Midline displacement was found in (9%). Crowding was observed in 35% and 31% and spacing in 24% and 15% of the maxillary and mandibular arches, respectively. A statistically significant relationship between gender and midline shift, a diastema, spacing in the upper arch, and most dental anomalies was found; males were more affected (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study reported a high prevalence of malocclusion among schoolchildren in Palestine. A collaborative effort should be directed to obtain more monitoring and surveillance of malocclusion more frequently to prevent and control the exacerbation of the problem.


Subject(s)
Arabs , Diastema , Malocclusion, Angle Class III , Malocclusion, Angle Class II , Malocclusion, Angle Class I , Malocclusion , Overbite , Humans , Male , Female , Malocclusion/epidemiology , Child , Prevalence , Overbite/epidemiology , Malocclusion, Angle Class II/epidemiology , Arabs/statistics & numerical data , Malocclusion, Angle Class III/epidemiology , Diastema/epidemiology , Malocclusion, Angle Class I/epidemiology , Middle East/epidemiology , Open Bite/epidemiology , Tooth Eruption, Ectopic/epidemiology , Anodontia/epidemiology , Sex Factors , Adolescent
5.
BMC Oral Health ; 24(1): 711, 2024 Jun 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38902685

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to assess the thickness of the soft tissue facial profile (STFP) in relation to the skeletal malocclusion, age and gender. METHODS: All patients, aged 7-35 years, who were seeking orthodontic treatment at the Department of Orthodontics, Medical University of Warsaw between 2019 and 22 were included in the study. All patients had lateral head radiographs taken before the treatment. The cephalometric analysis was performed including the STFP analysis. The patients were allocated to one of six groups based on age and skeletal relations (ANB angle). The minimum number of patients in each group was 60 with equal gender distribution. The STFP analysis included ten linear measurements. RESULTS: A total of 300 patients were included in the study and allocated to five groups. Group 6 (growing patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion) was not included in the study as it failed to achieve the assumed group size. There were significant differences in the thickness of the STFP in relation to the skeletal malocclusions. Adults with skeletal Class III malocclusion had significantly thicker subnasal soft tissues compared to patients with skeletal Class I and Class II malocclusions. The thickness of the lower lip in patients with Class II skeletal malocclusion was significantly bigger compared to the other groups. Children and adolescents with Class II malocclusions had thicker lower lip in comparison to the group with Class I malocclusion. The majority of the STFP measurements were significantly smaller in children and adolescents compared to adults. The thickness of the STFP in males was significantly bigger in all age groups compared to females. CONCLUSIONS: The thickness of facial soft tissues depends on the patient's age and gender. The degree of compensation of the skeletal malocclusion in the STFP may be a decisive factor during orthodontic treatment planning regarding a surgical approach or a camouflage treatment of skeletal defects.


Subject(s)
Cephalometry , Face , Malocclusion , Humans , Adolescent , Male , Female , Child , Face/anatomy & histology , Face/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Age Factors , Young Adult , Malocclusion/diagnostic imaging , Malocclusion/pathology , Sex Factors , Malocclusion, Angle Class III/diagnostic imaging , Malocclusion, Angle Class III/pathology , Malocclusion, Angle Class II/diagnostic imaging , Malocclusion, Angle Class II/pathology
7.
Clin Oral Investig ; 28(6): 331, 2024 May 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38775989

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Segmental Le Fort I osteotomy through the cleft is a common strategy to narrow the alveolar cleft in adults. This study compared skeletal stability between single and segmental Le Fort I osteotomies in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective analysis examined 45 adults with complete UCLP-associated class III deformities who underwent bimaxillary surgery with either single (n = 30) or segmental (n = 15) Le Fort I advancement. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of the facial skeleton were acquired before surgery, 1-week postsurgery, and at follow-up. Measures of landmarks from the CBCT images for the two treatment groups were compared for translation (left/right, posterior/anterior, superior/inferior) and rotation (yaw, roll, pitch). RESULTS: Postsurgery, the downward movement of the maxilla was larger in the segmental group than the single group. At follow-up, the maxilla moved backward in both groups, and upward in the segmental group. The mandible moved forward and upward and rotated upward in both groups. The amount of upward movement and rotation was larger in the segmental group than the single group. CONCLUSIONS: Two years after bimaxillary surgery in patients with UCLP-associated class III deformity, greater relapse was found after segmental Le Fort I osteotomies in vertical translation of the maxilla and mandible, and pitch rotation of the mandible compared with single Le Fort I osteotomies. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The vertical relapse of the maxilla was larger after segmental Le Fort I advancement compared with single Le Fort I advancement in clefts.


Subject(s)
Cleft Lip , Cleft Palate , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography , Malocclusion, Angle Class III , Osteotomy, Le Fort , Humans , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography/methods , Cleft Palate/surgery , Cleft Palate/diagnostic imaging , Cleft Lip/surgery , Cleft Lip/diagnostic imaging , Retrospective Studies , Osteotomy, Le Fort/methods , Female , Male , Malocclusion, Angle Class III/surgery , Malocclusion, Angle Class III/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Treatment Outcome , Maxilla/surgery , Maxilla/diagnostic imaging , Maxilla/abnormalities , Maxillary Osteotomy/methods , Anatomic Landmarks , Adolescent
8.
Clin Oral Investig ; 28(6): 334, 2024 May 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38780816

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The study aimed (1) to evaluate the site and severity of facial asymmetry in Class III patients before and after bimaxillary surgery, and (2) to identify the influence of initial severity and positional jaw asymmetry on residual facial asymmetry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Preoperative and postoperative cone-beam computed tomography of 65 patients with Class III facial asymmetry who underwent bimaxillary surgery were evaluated. Five midline and 14 paramedian facial soft tissue landmarks were identified to assess facial asymmetry. The outcomes were compared to a control group consisting of 30 age- and gender-matched Class I subjects. The postoperative positional jaw asymmetry (i.e., shift, roll, yaw) of each osteotomy segment (maxilla, mandible, chin, ramus) was also measured. RESULTS: Before surgery, the asymmetry was more severe at the chin, middle and lower contour. Bimaxillary surgery effectively corrected facial asymmetry, particularly in achieving normalization of chin deviation. However, significant asymmetry persisted postoperatively in the middle and lower contour (p < 0.001 and p < 0.01, respectively), which was affected by the positional ramus asymmetry in the roll and shift. CONCLUSIONS: Deviation of the chin, middle and lower contour contributed significantly to overall facial asymmetry in Class III asymmetry. Despite normalization of the chin deviation after bimaxillary surgery, asymmetry persisted at the middle and lower contour, primarily as the result of insufficient correction of the positional ramus asymmetry. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Understanding the residual asymmetry after bimaxillary surgery is important for minimizing deviation and optimizing the surgical planning for its correction.


Subject(s)
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography , Facial Asymmetry , Malocclusion, Angle Class III , Orthognathic Surgical Procedures , Humans , Facial Asymmetry/surgery , Facial Asymmetry/diagnostic imaging , Case-Control Studies , Female , Male , Malocclusion, Angle Class III/surgery , Malocclusion, Angle Class III/diagnostic imaging , Orthognathic Surgical Procedures/methods , Treatment Outcome , Adult , Anatomic Landmarks , Severity of Illness Index , Adolescent , Osteotomy, Le Fort
9.
Trials ; 25(1): 346, 2024 May 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38797838

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Dentofacial malformation is a common condition that affects a significant portion of the population, resulting in functional and aesthetic defects. Orthognathic surgeries, such as LeFort I osteotomy, are performed to correct these abnormalities. However, the impact of these surgeries on nasal profile changes remains unclear. Additionally, the role of anterior nasal spine (ANS) reduction in maxillary advancement surgeries of 3-5 mm range is yet to be determined. This study aims to investigate the effect of ANS reduction on soft tissue profile changes following LeFort I osteotomy with a maxillary advancement range of 3-5 mm in class III skeletal patients. The hypothesis is that the changes in nasolabial angle and upper lip length will not significantly differ between patients who undergo LeFort I osteotomy with and without ANS reduction. METHOD AND DESIGN: This study is designed as a randomized controlled trial. A total of 26 class III skeletal patients with maxillofacial abnormalities will be recruited from the maxillofacial clinic of Bu-Ali and Farahikhtegan Hospitals in Tehran, Iran. Patients meeting the inclusion criteria will be randomly assigned to two groups: one group will undergo LeFort I osteotomy with ANS reduction, and the other group will undergo LeFort I osteotomy without ANS reduction. The soft tissue profile changes, specifically the nasolabial angle and upper lip length, will be evaluated and compared between the two groups. DISCUSSION: Achieving facial harmony through orthognathic surgery requires careful planning and consideration of the impact on surrounding soft tissue. The primary objective is to predict and plan for the effects on the nasolabial region. LeFort I osteotomy is a common procedure used to correct dentofacial deformities, particularly in class III patients. Maxillary advancement during this surgery can lead to changes in nasal tip position, width, and rotation, potentially due to repositioning of the anterior nasal spine and soft tissue dissection. In this study, soft tissue changes will be assessed in non-growing class III patients using cephalometric radiographs. The impact of reducing the anterior nasal spine (ANS) on nasal profile changes will be investigated for maxillary advancements of 3-5 mm. Objective measurements and patient-reported outcomes will be evaluated to gain insights into the aesthetic outcomes of orthognathic surgery. The findings will provide valuable guidance for treatment decisions and alternative options based on expected nasal profile changes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This project was registered at The Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (Identifier No. IRCT20210928052625N1, Website: https://www.irct.ir/trial/59171 ) and Open Science Framework (OSF) (Registration https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/X3HD4 ). 2021-06-09.


Subject(s)
Malocclusion, Angle Class III , Maxilla , Nose , Osteotomy, Le Fort , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Humans , Osteotomy, Le Fort/methods , Treatment Outcome , Malocclusion, Angle Class III/surgery , Malocclusion, Angle Class III/diagnostic imaging , Maxilla/surgery , Maxilla/diagnostic imaging , Nose/surgery , Young Adult , Adult , Female , Male , Adolescent , Iran , Lip/surgery
10.
BMC Oral Health ; 24(1): 616, 2024 May 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38802759

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of our study is to compare the relationship between hand-wrist and cervical vertebra maturation stages with chronological age and to investigate the effect of malocclusion type on the relationship between these methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Hand-wrist and cephalometric radiographs of 1000 patients (526 females, 474 males) with a mean age of 13.41 ± 1.83 were analyzed. The methods of Bacetti et al. were used for the cervical vertebra maturation stage, and Björk, Grave and Brown's methods were used for the hand-wrist maturation stage. One-way ANOVA test was applied to compare skeletal classes between them. Tukey post hoc test was used to determine the differences. The relationship between the malocclusion type, cervical vertebra and hand-wrist maturation stages was evaluated with the Spearman correlation test. RESULTS: Spearman's correlation coefficient was 0.831, 0.831 and 0.760 in Class I, II and III females, respectively. In males, it was calculated as 0.844, 0.889 and 0.906, respectively. When sex and malocclusion were not differentiated, the correlation was found to be 0.887. All were statistically significant (P < 0.001). The highest correlation was observed in class III males, while the lowest was found in class III females. CONCLUSION: Cervical vertebrae can be used safely to assess pubertal spurt without hand-wrist radiography. Diagnosing growth and development stages from cephalometric images is important in reducing additional workload and preventing radiation risk.


Subject(s)
Age Determination by Skeleton , Cephalometry , Cervical Vertebrae , Malocclusion , Humans , Male , Female , Cervical Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Adolescent , Age Determination by Skeleton/methods , Child , Malocclusion/diagnostic imaging , Malocclusion, Angle Class I/diagnostic imaging , Malocclusion, Angle Class III/diagnostic imaging , Sex Factors , Malocclusion, Angle Class II/diagnostic imaging , Patient Care Planning , Hand Bones/diagnostic imaging , Hand Bones/growth & development , Age Factors
11.
BMJ Case Rep ; 17(5)2024 May 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38782430

ABSTRACT

The aim of this case series is to present the successful treatments and long-term results of three adult skeletal class III patients treated with the surgery-first (SF) approach by applying the SDU (Suleyman Demirel University) protocol and to discuss the differences, advantages and disadvantages compared with other methods. Although there were differences in the treatment planning and surgical procedures of the three patients in the case series, the same protocol was followed in all three patients. The desired aesthetic result and functional occlusion were achieved with the SF approach. Significant improvement was observed in the patients' profile and facial appearance in a short time. The total duration of treatment for all cases was less than a year.


Subject(s)
Malocclusion, Angle Class III , Humans , Malocclusion, Angle Class III/surgery , Malocclusion, Angle Class III/therapy , Female , Male , Adult , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
12.
J Craniofac Surg ; 35(4): 1249-1252, 2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38691047

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of orthognathic surgery on masseter volume in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion with facial asymmetry and the effect of masseter volume on stability in orthognathic surgery. METHODS: This research studied 16 patients with Class III malocclusion with facial asymmetry who received combined orthodontic-orthognathic treatment and underwent craniofacial computed tomography (CT) before (T0), 2 weeks after (T1), and 6 months after (T2) surgery. Three-dimensional (3D) CT images were retrospectively analyzed, using 3D volume reconstruction to obtain the masseter volume and examine the impact of the masseter volume on stability in orthognathic surgery. RESULTS: A statistically significant difference ( P < 0.05) in the volume of the masseter was found up to 6 months after orthognathic surgery compared with the preoperative period, and the reduction in the masticatory muscle volume on the lengthened side is greater than on the shortened side ( P < 0.05). The volume of both masseters differed according to facial asymmetry, and the difference was significantly reduced after orthognathic surgery ( P < 0.05). During the period time (T1-T2), cephalometric maxillary marker points were not significantly different ( P > 0.05), and mandibular marker points were significantly anteriorly shifted ( P < 0.05). There was an association between the masseter volume and anterior shift of point B (R > 0.5, P < 0.05), the upward and anterior shifts of the gonion point differed between the lengthened and shortened sides ( P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The size of the masseter becomes smaller 6 months after orthognathic surgery, and orthognathic surgery improves both bone and soft tissue symmetry. A larger sagittal relapse of mandibular setback occurred in patients with greater masseter volume. Considering these alterations may be helpful in planning orthognathic surgery.


Subject(s)
Facial Asymmetry , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Malocclusion, Angle Class III , Masseter Muscle , Orthognathic Surgical Procedures , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Humans , Malocclusion, Angle Class III/surgery , Malocclusion, Angle Class III/diagnostic imaging , Female , Male , Facial Asymmetry/surgery , Facial Asymmetry/diagnostic imaging , Masseter Muscle/diagnostic imaging , Masseter Muscle/pathology , Orthognathic Surgical Procedures/methods , Retrospective Studies , Adult , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult , Cephalometry , Adolescent
13.
Codas ; 36(3): e20230203, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38695438

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate three-dimensional facial soft tissue dimensions, maximum bite force (MBF), and occlusal contact area in patients with DFD. In addition, we analyzed the relationship between MBF and the three-dimensional facial measurements. METHODS: Thirty-two patients with skeletal Class III DFD and 20 patients with Class II DFD underwent a soft tissue evaluation using surface laser scanning, as well as MBF and occlusal contact area assessments. The DFD groups were compared with each other and with 25 healthy subjects. RESULTS: Significant morphological differences were found in the transversal, vertical, and anteroposterior dimensions between Class II DFD and Class III DFD. Both DFD groups presented an increased linear distance of chin height, which was strongly related with decreased MBF magnitude. The DFD groups exhibited lower MBF and occlusal contact area, with no significant differences between Class II and Class III DFD. CONCLUSION: The presence of DFD affected 3D measurements of facial soft tissue, causing variations beyond normal limits, lower MBF, and occlusal contact area in both Class II and Class III DFD patients. The vertical dimension might have influenced the lower MBF magnitude in the studied skeletal deformities.


Subject(s)
Bite Force , Cephalometry , Face , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Humans , Female , Male , Face/physiopathology , Face/diagnostic imaging , Young Adult , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Adolescent , Malocclusion, Angle Class III/physiopathology , Malocclusion, Angle Class III/diagnostic imaging , Malocclusion, Angle Class II/physiopathology , Malocclusion, Angle Class II/diagnostic imaging , Cross-Sectional Studies
14.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg ; 52(6): 727-732, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38582674

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to evaluate maxillary bone healing and computed tomography (CT) values after Le Fort I osteotomy with sagittal split ramus osteotomy in patients with class II and III malocclusion. Four absorbable plates and screws were used to fix the maxillary segments in all patients. For 112 sides (58 patients), the bone defect areas at the anterior and posterior sites between the maxillary segments were measured using 3-dimensional CT views reconstructed over a constant CT value at 1 week and 1 year postoperatively. Subsequently, CT values at the upper, middle, and lower sites around the osteotomy line in the medial, middle, and lateral regions were measured. The bone defect area after 1 year increased at the anterior site in class III and at both the anterior and posterior sites in class II (P < 0.05). This study suggests that the increase in bone defect area was affected by lower CT values at the middle site of the middle and lateral regions in class II, and that bony defects between fragments in the maxilla could partially remain in both classes II and III within 1 year after Le Fort I osteotomy.


Subject(s)
Absorbable Implants , Bone Plates , Maxilla , Osteotomy, Le Fort , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Humans , Female , Retrospective Studies , Male , Maxilla/surgery , Maxilla/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Adult , Young Adult , Adolescent , Malocclusion, Angle Class II/surgery , Malocclusion, Angle Class II/diagnostic imaging , Malocclusion, Angle Class III/surgery , Malocclusion, Angle Class III/diagnostic imaging , Wound Healing/physiology , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Osteotomy, Sagittal Split Ramus/methods , Osteotomy, Sagittal Split Ramus/instrumentation , Bone Screws
15.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; 4: CD003451, 2024 04 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38597341

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Prominent lower front teeth (Class III malocclusion) may be due to jaw or tooth position or both. The upper jaw (maxilla) can be too far back or the lower jaw (mandible) too far forward; the upper front teeth (incisors) may be tipped back or the lower front teeth tipped forwards. Orthodontic treatment uses different types of braces (appliances) fitted inside or outside the mouth (or both) and fixed to the teeth. A facemask is the most commonly reported non-surgical intervention used to correct Class III malocclusion. The facemask rests on the forehead and chin, and is connected to the upper teeth via an expansion appliance (known as 'rapid maxillary expansion' (RME)). Using elastic bands placed by the wearer, a force is applied to the top teeth and jaw to pull them forwards and downward. Some orthodontic interventions involve a surgical component; these go through the gum into the bone (e.g. miniplates). In severe cases, or if orthodontic treatment is unsuccessful, people may need jaw (orthognathic) surgery as adults. This review updates one published in 2013. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of orthodontic treatment for prominent lower front teeth in children and adolescents. SEARCH METHODS: An information specialist searched four bibliographic databases and two trial registries up to 16 January 2023. Review authors screened reference lists. SELECTION CRITERIA: We looked for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) involving children and adolescents (16 years of age or under) randomised to receive orthodontic treatment to correct prominent lower front teeth (Class III malocclusion), or no (or delayed) treatment. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Our primary outcome was overjet (i.e. prominence of the lower front teeth); our secondary outcomes included ANB (A point, nasion, B point) angle (which measures the relative position of the maxilla to the mandible). MAIN RESULTS: We identified 29 RCTs that randomised 1169 children (1102 analysed). The children were five to 13 years old at the start of treatment. Most studies measured outcomes directly after treatment; only one study provided long-term follow-up. All studies were at high risk of bias as participant and personnel blinding was not possible. Non-surgical orthodontic treatment versus untreated control We found moderate-certainty evidence that non-surgical orthodontic treatments provided a substantial improvement in overjet (mean difference (MD) 5.03 mm, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.81 to 6.25; 4 studies, 184 participants) and ANB (MD 3.05°, 95% CI 2.40 to 3.71; 8 studies, 345 participants), compared to an untreated control group, when measured immediately after treatment. There was high heterogeneity in the analyses, but the effects were consistently in favour of the orthodontic treatment groups rather than the untreated control groups (studies tested facemask (with or without RME), chin cup, orthodontic removable traction appliance, tandem traction bow appliance, reverse Twin Block with lip pads and RME, Reverse Forsus and mandibular headgear). Longer-term outcomes were measured in only one study, which evaluated facemask. It presented low-certainty evidence that improvements in overjet and ANB were smaller at 3-year follow-up than just after treatment (overjet MD 2.5 mm, 95% CI 1.21 to 3.79; ANB MD 1.4°, 95% CI 0.43 to 2.37; 63 participants), and were not found at 6-year follow-up (overjet MD 1.30 mm, 95% CI -0.16 to 2.76; ANB MD 0.7°, 95% CI -0.74 to 2.14; 65 participants). In the same study, at the 6-year follow-up, clinicians made an assessment of whether surgical correction of participants' jaw position was likely to be needed in the future. A perceived need for surgical correction was observed more often in participants who had not received facemask treatment (odds ratio (OR) 3.34, 95% CI 1.21 to 9.24; 65 participants; low-certainty evidence). Surgical orthodontic treatment versus untreated control One study of 30 participants evaluated surgical miniplates, with facemask or Class III elastics, against no treatment, and found a substantial improvement in overjet (MD 7.96 mm, 95% CI 6.99 to 8.40) and ANB (MD 5.20°, 95% CI 4.48 to 5.92; 30 participants). However, the evidence was of low certainty, and there was no follow-up beyond the end of treatment. Facemask versus another non-surgical orthodontic treatment Eight studies compared facemask or modified facemask (with or without RME) to another non-surgical orthodontic treatment. Meta-analysis did not suggest that other treatments were superior; however, there was high heterogeneity, with mixed, uncertain findings (very low-certainty evidence). Facemask versus surgically-anchored appliance There may be no advantage of adding surgical anchorage to facemasks for ANB (MD -0.35, 95% CI -0.78 to 0.07; 4 studies, 143 participants; low-certainty evidence). The evidence for overjet was of very low certainty (MD -0.40 mm, 95% CI -1.30 to 0.50; 1 study, 43 participants). Facemask variations Adding RME to facemask treatment may have no additional benefit for ANB (MD -0.15°, 95% CI -0.94 to 0.64; 2 studies, 60 participants; low-certainty evidence). The evidence for overjet was of low certainty (MD 1.86 mm, 95% CI 0.39 to 3.33; 1 study, 31 participants). There may be no benefit in terms of effect on ANB of alternating rapid maxillary expansion and constriction compared to using expansion alone (MD -0.46°, 95% CI -1.03 to 0.10; 4 studies, 131 participants; low-certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Moderate-certainty evidence showed that non-surgical orthodontic treatments (which included facemask, reverse Twin Block, orthodontic removable traction appliance, chin cup, tandem traction bow appliance and mandibular headgear) improved the bite and jaw relationship immediately post-treatment. Low-certainty evidence showed surgical orthodontic treatments were also effective. One study measured longer-term outcomes and found that the benefit from facemask was reduced three years after treatment, and appeared to be lost by six years. However, participants receiving facemask treatment were judged by clinicians to be less likely to need jaw surgery in adulthood. We have low confidence in these findings and more studies are required to reach reliable conclusions. Orthodontic treatment for Class III malocclusion can be invasive, expensive and time-consuming, so future trials should include measurement of adverse effects and patient satisfaction, and should last long enough to evaluate whether orthodontic treatment in childhood avoids the need for jaw surgery in adulthood.


Subject(s)
Malocclusion, Angle Class III , Orthodontics, Corrective , Adolescent , Child , Humans , Child, Preschool , Orthodontic Appliances , Malocclusion, Angle Class III/therapy , Dental Care , Mouth
16.
Angle Orthod ; 94(3): 286-293, 2024 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38639459

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the dentoskeletal effects and effectiveness of the eruption guidance appliance in Class III patients in the mixed dentition. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The experimental group comprised 22 patients with Class III malocclusion and anterior cross-bite (12 males, 10 females, mean age 7.63 ± 0.96 years) treated with the eruption guidance appliance over a mean period of 1.72 ± 0.48 years. The control group comprised 22 untreated subjects (12 males, 10 females, mean age 7.21 ± 0.60 years) with Class III malocclusion. Lateral cephalometric radiographs were obtained at pretreatment (T1) and posttreatment (T2). Intergroup comparisons were performed with Mann-Whitney and t-tests (P < .05). RESULTS: In the experimental and control groups, the anteroposterior relationship between the maxilla and mandible (ANB angle) remained stable during the treatment period (T1 to T2). The mandibular plane angle decreased in the experimental group and increased in the control group. In the experimental group, the lower anterior face height increase and maxillary molar vertical development were significantly smaller compared to controls. Positive overjet was achieved in 54% of the experimental group. CONCLUSIONS: The eruption guidance appliance produced no change in the skeletal anteroposterior relationship. The anterior cross-bite/edge-to-edge relationship was corrected in only about half of the treated subjects.


Subject(s)
Malocclusion, Angle Class III , Malocclusion, Angle Class II , Malocclusion , Overbite , Male , Female , Humans , Child , Malocclusion, Angle Class III/diagnostic imaging , Malocclusion, Angle Class III/therapy , Malocclusion/therapy , Mandible , Maxilla , Cephalometry , Malocclusion, Angle Class II/therapy
17.
J Craniofac Surg ; 35(4): e361-e367, 2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38587371

ABSTRACT

AIMS: The study aimed at analyzing patient's case sheets in regard to the incidence of skeletal discrepancy present in cases and its relation with the demographic profile of the sample. All these are chronicled for more than 10 years periods. METHODOLOGY: This is a retrospective study analysis of the orthognathic case sheets for more than 10 years period. The total numbers of patients are 678. Patient's case sheet was already prepared by the Multi-Disciplinary Team Orthognathic Surgery Clinic in Al-Salam Teaching Hospital, which is the only authorized committee in Nineveh Health Directorate. RESULTS: The highest age percentage is between (18 and 27 y/76%). Angle class III cases are the uppermost cases (36%) from the total. A significant P value is clear at the level ≤0.05 and ≤0.01 between surgery type and discrepancy in anterior segmental osteotomies (upper and lower) which is performed in bi-maxillary protrusion cases and Angle class II cases (0.01**). Similarly, anterior segmental osteotomies (upper jaw only) which are indicated in both open bite and Angle Class II cases documented as a statistically significant P value (0.02*). The positive correlation is shown in all variables with the disharmony or facial discrepancies. Esthetic and beauty as causes for treatment recorded more than function in relation to time series. CONCLUSION: This study documents that patients with skeletal class III accounted for the largest percentage (64%) in the study group. A high increase in patients number seeking treatment for their discrepancy is obvious with time from 2009 till 2022.


Subject(s)
Orthognathic Surgical Procedures , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Male , Female , Adult , Adolescent , Iraq , Malocclusion, Angle Class III/surgery , Young Adult , Malocclusion/surgery , Malocclusion/epidemiology
18.
Eur J Paediatr Dent ; 25(2): 155-162, 2024 06 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38590260

ABSTRACT

AIM: To comparatively analyse the skeletal and dento-alveolar changes after treatment with Class III Bi-Maxillary Plates (BMPs) and FM appliances in growing patients with Class III skeletal malocclusion. CONCLUSION: BMPs with class III elastics provided a similar pattern of skeletal and dento-alveolar changes compared to FMs, however supported by slightly greater dentoalveolar effects that contribute to the correction of the class III malocclusion in growing subjects.


Subject(s)
Cephalometry , Extraoral Traction Appliances , Malocclusion, Angle Class III , Maxilla , Orthodontic Appliance Design , Humans , Malocclusion, Angle Class III/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Female , Child , Male , Treatment Outcome , Bone Plates , Follow-Up Studies , Mandible , Adolescent , Alveolar Process
19.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg ; 52(5): 612-618, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38448337

ABSTRACT

Orthognathic surgery is highly effective for treating maxillomandibular discrepancies in patients with class III malocclusion. However, whether one- or two-jaw surgery should be selected remains controversial. Our study aimed to evaluate quantitative differences between one-jaw and two-jaw surgical designs. In total, 100 consecutive patients with skeletal class III malocclusion who underwent orthognathic surgery with preoperative three-dimensional simulation between August 2016 and November 2021 were recruited. Based on the same final occlusal setup, a two-jaw surgery design and two types of one-jaw design were created. In total, 400 image sets, including preoperative images and three types of surgical simulation, were measured and compared. The one-jaw mandibular setback design led to improvement in most cephalometric measurements and facial symmetry. Although the one-jaw maxillary advancement design improved the ANB angle and facial convexity, it induced maxillary protrusion and reduced facial symmetry. Compared with the other designs, the two-jaw design provided significantly closer cephalometric measurements to the normative values, better symmetry, and less occlusal cant. Overall, the two-jaw design provided a quantitatively better facial appearance in terms of symmetry, proportion, and profile. Although an optimal surgical design necessitates thorough preoperative evaluation and a shared decision-making process, two-jaw surgery can be considered for improving overall facial esthetics and harmony.


Subject(s)
Cephalometry , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Malocclusion, Angle Class III , Orthognathic Surgical Procedures , Patient Care Planning , Humans , Malocclusion, Angle Class III/surgery , Orthognathic Surgical Procedures/methods , Female , Male , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Adult , Young Adult , Maxilla/surgery , Adolescent , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/methods , Mandible/surgery
20.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop ; 165(6): 638-651, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38466248

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated the masseter muscle changes after surgical-orthodontic treatment in patients with a skeletal Class III malocclusion using automatic segmentation. METHODS: Images of 120 patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion were obtained and reconstructed at T0 (pretreatment), T1 (presurgery), and T2 (6-12-month postsurgery). The patients were divided into symmetrical and asymmetrical groups. The volume, major axis length, maximum cross-sectional area, horizontal cross-sectional area 5 mm above the mandibular foramen (CSAF), and orientation were calculated automatically. RESULTS: In the asymmetrical group, the volume and major axis length on the deviated side were lower than on the nondeviated side at T0, T1, and T2 (P <0.05). There were no significant differences in maximum cross-sectional area and CSAF bilaterally. The orientation was coronally more vertical and sagittally more forward on the deviated side (both P <0.001). In the symmetrical group, there were no significant bilateral differences at T0, T1, and T2. The volume, major axis length, and CSAF decreased, and the coronal orientation was more vertical on the nondeviated side at T2 than at T0 in both groups (P <0.05). The coronal plane orientation was more inclined on the deviated side at T2 than at T0 in the asymmetrical group (P <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The smaller volume on the deviated side at T2 indicates the need for myofunctional training after surgery. The masseter muscle volume and the cross-sectional area did not recover to the preorthodontic levels. Studies with longer follow-up durations are needed to confirm these findings.


Subject(s)
Facial Asymmetry , Malocclusion, Angle Class III , Mandible , Masseter Muscle , Humans , Malocclusion, Angle Class III/surgery , Malocclusion, Angle Class III/diagnostic imaging , Malocclusion, Angle Class III/therapy , Masseter Muscle/diagnostic imaging , Female , Male , Mandible/diagnostic imaging , Mandible/surgery , Facial Asymmetry/surgery , Facial Asymmetry/diagnostic imaging , Young Adult , Adolescent , Orthognathic Surgical Procedures/methods , Adult , Orthodontics, Corrective/methods , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...