ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This study assessed patient's satisfaction after orthodontic treatment in the postgraduate orthodontic clinic of the Dental School at the University of Athens (Athens, Greece), and investigated possible correlations between satisfaction after orthodontic treatment and life satisfaction, alongside the influence of age, gender, severity of initial orthodontic malocclusion and duration of retention period. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients aged 12 years and above, who had recently completed comprehensive orthodontic treatment, participated completing two questionnaires: a 37-item questionnaire, validated for assessing orthodontic treatment satisfaction; and the 5-item Satisfaction with Life Scale, a valid and reliable measure of life satisfaction. Scores from each questionnaire were summed for each patient. Demographic details, Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN) and the duration of the retention period up to questionnaire completion were collected. Multiple regression analysis assessed the relationship between the questionnaires and the evaluated variables. RESULTS: A total of 150 patients answered the questionnaires, being 82 women (55%) and 68 men (45%). The mean age of patients was 18.87 ± 5.97 years (range: 12-47). Most patients expressed satisfaction with treatment outcomes (grades 5 and 6). Satisfaction with orthodontic treatment showed a significant correlation with life satisfaction (p=0.002), but not with gender, age, dental/esthetic components of IOTN, or the duration of the retention period. CONCLUSION: Satisfaction after orthodontic treatment exhibited a significant correlation with life satisfaction, but it was not affected by gender, age, dental/esthetic components of IOTN, or the duration of the retention period.
Subject(s)
Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need , Malocclusion , Orthodontics, Corrective , Patient Satisfaction , Humans , Female , Male , Child , Adolescent , Orthodontics, Corrective/psychology , Malocclusion/therapy , Malocclusion/psychology , Adult , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult , Middle Aged , Sex Factors , Age Factors , Quality of Life , Treatment Outcome , Personal Satisfaction , Esthetics, Dental , Orthodontic RetainersABSTRACT
The present study aimed to investigate the prevalence of dissatisfaction with dental appearance among 24-year-old Brazilian adults and the associated factors in life course. A subsample (n = 720) of the 1982 Pelotas Birth Cohort in southern Brazil was investigated at the ages of 15 and 24 years using clinical (caries and periodontal) examinations and interviews. The outcome was dissatisfaction with dental appearance at the age of 24 years. Covariate variables included socioeconomic factors, oral health, and dissatisfaction with general appearance collected during different periods of life. Poisson regression models with robust variance were applied. The prevalence of dissatisfaction with dental appearance was 43.5% (95%CI: 39.8-47.1). Individuals with downward income mobility (PR = 1.22, 95%CI: 1.07-1.79) and those always poor (PR = 1.21, 95%CI: 1.00-1.57) presented a higher prevalence of dissatisfaction with their dental appearance even after oral health variables and dissatisfaction with general appearance were controlled for. Moderate/severe malocclusion at 15 years (PR = 1.34, 95%CI: 1.13-1.59), highest experience of untreated dental caries at 24 years (PR = 1.82, 95%CI: 1.46-2.27), and dental pain experience at 24 years (PR = 1.29, 95%CI: 1.22-1.75) were associated with the outcome. Also, the prevalence of dissatisfaction with dental appearance was 20% higher (PR = 1.20, 95%CI: 1.01-1.43) among those dissatisfied with their general appearance. Our findings demonstrated a high prevalence of dissatisfaction with dental appearance among young adults. Lifetime economic disadvantage and dental problems (malocclusion at 15 years, untreated dental caries at 24 years, and dental pain at 24 years) were associated with dissatisfaction with dental appearance among young adults.
Subject(s)
Oral Health , Humans , Young Adult , Brazil/epidemiology , Female , Male , Adolescent , Oral Health/statistics & numerical data , Socioeconomic Factors , Social Class , Malocclusion/psychology , Malocclusion/epidemiology , Personal Satisfaction , Dental Caries/epidemiology , Dental Caries/psychology , Poisson Distribution , Esthetics, Dental/psychologyABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to evaluate the convergence between the domains of the Autoquestionnaire Qualité de Vie Enfant image (AUQUEI) and the Child Perceptions Questionnaire (CPQ8-10) in the mixed dentition. A sample of 676 children aged 8 to 10 years responded to the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) questionnaires using the AUQUEI and the CPQ8-10, respectively. Clinical (dental caries and malocclusion) and socioeconomic variables were assessed. The validity of convergence between scores (total and per domain) of the two instruments was assessed by Spearman correlation analysis, considering that non-zero coefficient values represented a correlation between scores. The median was calculated to compare the scores of each questionnaire relative to the variables, and the nonparametric Mann-Whitney test was applied to determine statistically significant differences between the categories. A weak significant correlation (between 0.30 and 0.50) was observed between the domains and the total scores of instruments (p < 0.05), except for the leisure domain (p > 0.05). Participants with a lower family income had worse HRQoL (p < 0.05), and those with caries and malocclusion experience had worse OHRQoL (p < 0.05). In conclusion, the AUQUEI and CPQ8-10 instruments showed a weak correlation. Income and clinical variables had a negative impact on the AUQUEI and CPQ8-10, respectively.
Subject(s)
Dental Caries , Dentition, Mixed , Malocclusion , Oral Health , Quality of Life , Socioeconomic Factors , Humans , Child , Oral Health/statistics & numerical data , Female , Male , Surveys and Questionnaires , Malocclusion/psychology , Statistics, Nonparametric , Dental Caries/psychology , Reproducibility of Results , Cross-Sectional Studies , Reference ValuesABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to understand the influence of orthosurgical treatment on oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) in patients with Class II and III skeletal malocclusion by conducting a mixed method case series study. Nineteen patients submitted to orthosurgical treatment in a private practice in Brazil were included in the sample. Data were collected retrospectively and interviews were held from March 2020 to July 2021. Patients answered to the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) in the first part of the interview and subsequently answered the qualitative questions. The overall mean of OHIP-14 after treatment was 4.21 (SD 4.68). The qualitative data were analyzed according to thematic analysis and four themes emerged from the interviews: a) concept of quality of life, b) pre-treatment life, c) post-treatment life, and d) positive and negative aspects of treatment. Quality of Life was reported by the patients as the absence of feeling pain, having emotional and physical health, having a satisfactory esthetic appearance and self-esteem. Before treatment, most Class II patients used to complain about breathing and sleeping problems, while Class III patients complained more intensely about esthetics. Pain was a common problem reported by both Class II and Class III patients. In general, improvement was perceived in self-esteem, esthetics, function and pain. Complaints about negative aspects of the treatment were restricted to the postoperative period. The orthosurgical treatment was important for improving the OHRQoL of patients in terms of esthetic, functional and psychosocial aspects.
Subject(s)
Malocclusion , Quality of Life , Humans , Quality of Life/psychology , Retrospective Studies , Malocclusion/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Pain , Oral HealthABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To identify any association between the psychosocial impact of malocclusion and academic performance in adolescents. METHODS: Cross-sectional study in a sample of 297 adolescents aged 10 to 14 years old enrolled in public schools. A self-complete questionnaire enquiring about socioeconomic, demographic, and psychological characteristics and the Psychosocial Impact of Dental Aesthetics Questionnaire (PIDAQ) was administered in classrooms. The school provided documents related to School Performance (average grade in the Portuguese subject and absences). A conceptual structure was built, and independent variables were inserted hierarchically into logistic models for school performance (outcome). Independent variables were: Gender, age, caries status (DMFT), orthodontic treatment need (IOTN-DHC), psychological impact (PIDAQ) and school commitment (class absences and missed classes). RESULTS: Boys (OR = 3.56; 95% CI: 1.54-8.21) with caries experience (OR = 2.77; 95% CI: 1.23-6.23), need for orthodontic treatment (OR = 0.40; 95% CI; 0.18-0.91) and adolescents who reported a psychological impact (OR = 2.70; 95% CI: 1.16-6.30) had worse school performance. CONCLUSION: Boys with caries and malocclusion experience who reported the psychological impact of the need for orthodontic treatment are more likely to have worse school performance.
Subject(s)
Academic Performance , Dental Caries , Malocclusion , Adolescent , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Dental Caries/epidemiology , Esthetics, Dental , Humans , Male , Malocclusion/psychology , Malocclusion/therapy , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence and severity of malocclusion and its impact on oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) and self-reported satisfaction of patients with anorexia and bulimia nervosa. METHODS: The sample consisted of sixty women who attended a specialized mental health clinic of a Brazilian medical school. Participants were distributed into two groups: patients with anorexia and bulimia nervosa (ABN; n=30) and control patients without eating disorders (CN; n=30). The dental occlusion was evaluated by the Dental Aesthetic Index; the OHRQoL was assessed using the OHIP-14 questionnaire; and the self-reported satisfaction with the appearance of teeth, speech ability and chewing was obtained by interviews. RESULTS: Severe and very severe malocclusion were observed in 26.67% and 46.67% of patients in the ABN group, respectively, while the CN group showed 80.00% of patients without abnormality/mild malocclusion. ABN group showed a higher proportion of patients (p < 0.05) with tooth loss, spacing in the region of incisors, maxillary misalignment, and mandibular misalignment in relation to CN group. ABN group presented lower (p< 0.05) OHRQoL and self-reported satisfaction with the appearance of teeth, speech ability and chewing, compared to the CN group. There was a significant positive correlation (p< 0.05) between the Dental Aesthetic Index and OHIP-14 scores in the ABN group. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of severe malocclusion in ABN group was high, with a negative impact on OHRQoL and self-reported satisfaction with the chewing ability, speech ability and appearance of teeth.
Subject(s)
Feeding and Eating Disorders , Malocclusion , Anorexia , Feeding and Eating Disorders/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Malocclusion/epidemiology , Malocclusion/psychology , Oral Health , Quality of Life/psychology , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the relationships between individual, environmental, clinical factors and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) in patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP) following orthognathic surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A follow-up study was conducted involving 69 adults with unilateral and bilateral CLP under orthodontic treatment. Interviews and oral examinations were conducted prior to orthognathic surgery (T0) to evaluate age, gender, psychological well-being, dental caries, malocclusion, social support, social networks, family income and education and OHRQoL. All participants were reviewed after 6 months (T1) to re-assess psychological well-being, malocclusion and OHRQoL. Structural equation modeling estimated the associations between the variables. RESULTS: OHRQoL total scores reduced following orthognathic surgery, from 11.7 to 6.9 (P < 0.01). Occlusal characteristics and psychological well-being improved between T0 and T1. In the structural equation modeling, reduction of malocclusion (ß = 0.02) between T0 and T1 directly predicted poor OHRQoL at T1. Improvement of psychological well-being between T0 and T1 was associated with better OHRQoL at T1 (ß = -0.07). Dental caries and malocclusion at T0 were indirectly linked to poor OHRQoL at T1 (ß = 0.02). LIMITATIONS: The short follow-up period of 6 months after orthognathic surgery. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: This represents the first prospective study examining the interrelationships of predictors of OHRQoL in patients with CLP after orthognathic surgery. OHRQoL and psychological well-being improved after orthognathic surgery. Clinical and psychological characteristics were important determinants of OHRQoL. These findings suggest the importance of the biopsychosocial model of health and the patient-centered approach in oral health care in individuals with CLP.
Subject(s)
Cleft Lip , Cleft Palate , Dental Caries , Malocclusion , Orthognathic Surgery , Adult , Cleft Lip/psychology , Cleft Lip/surgery , Cleft Palate/psychology , Cleft Palate/surgery , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Malocclusion/psychology , Malocclusion/surgery , Oral Health , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life/psychology , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
Background: To correlate the need for orthodontic treatment between the self-perception of Chilean adolescents from 14 to 18 years old with the observation of a dentist using the same assessment scale, as well as to determine if covariates such as gender, age and type of school influence the self-perception of the adolescent and the examiner. Material and Methods: Cross-sectional descriptive study of adolescents aged 14 to 18 years from public, subsidized and private schools in Temuco, Chile. The probability sample is stratified by course, from first to fourth year, a total of 414 students participated, according to the eligibility criteria. The photographic score of the aesthetic component (AC) of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN) was used. The statistical analysis of the data was performed with the SPSS Statistics program v.23. Results: 94.9% of the adolescents perceived themselves as having good aesthetics. The examiner considered that 77% presented this condition, p<0.00. Males perceived themselves better than females. At age 15, 1.7% of students considered themselves to have poor aesthetics, p<0.01. From the examiner's perspective, aesthetics are related to type of school, p<0.00. Conclusion: Adolescents perceive themselves better aesthetically than do the evaluators. The school type factor, according to the IOTN-AC examiner, shows a higher proportion of students with no need for orthodontic treatment in private schools, and a threshold need in municipal and subsidized institutions.
Correlacionar la necesidad de tratamiento ortodóncico, entre la autopercepción de adolescentes con el diagnóstico de un evaluador odontólogo, utilizando la misma escala de valoración, así también determinar si las variables como el género, la edad y la dependencia educacional influyen en la autopercepción del adolescente y la observación del examinador. Material y Métodos: Estudio descriptivo de corte transversal, en adolescentes de 14 a 18 años de escuelas públicas, subvencionadas y privadas de Temuco-Chile. Muestreo probabilístico estratificado por cursos, de primero a cuarto medio con una muestra de 414 estudiantes, según los criterios de elegibilidad. Se utilizó el score fotográfico del componente estético (AC) del Índice de Necesidad de Tratamiento de Ortodoncia (INTO). El análisis estadístico de los datos fue realizado con el programa SPSS Statistics v.23. Resultados: El 94,9% de los adolescentes se autoperciben con una buena estética, el examinador considera que un 77% presenta esta condición, p<0,00. Los varones se perciben mejor que las damas. Los adolescentes de 15 años un 1,7% considera tener mala estética, p<0,01. Desde la perspectiva del examinador la estética se relaciona con la dependencia educacional, <0,01. Conclusión: Los adolescentes se autoperciben mejor estéticamente que lo diagnosticado por evaluadores odontólogos. El factor dependencia educacional según INTO-AC examinador, muestra mayor proporción de estudiantes sin necesidad de tratamiento ortodóncico en los establecimientos privados, y necesidad límite en los públicos y subvencionados.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Self Concept , Students/psychology , Esthetics, Dental , Orthodontics, Corrective/psychology , Chile , Oral Health , Epidemiology, Descriptive , Needs Assessment , Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need , Malocclusion/psychology , Malocclusion/therapyABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the influence of dental trauma on oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) of children and their families. Methods: A total of 571 children aged five years were randomly selected at public schools. Trauma was clinically evaluated in accordance with the Andreasen classification. Caries experience in the anterior region and increased overjet were determined according to the World Health Organization criteria. The Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale (ECOHIS) was answered by the parents and used to evaluate OHRQoL. In addition, this questionnaire has aspects related to socioeconomic status. Simple logistic regression was performed, and the raw Odds Ratios with the respective 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were estimated. The variables with p<0.20 were tested in multiple logistic regression models, and those with p≤0.05 remained in the model and the adjusted odds ratio with respective 95%CI was estimated. Results: Income showed a magnitude of association of 1.56 and 2.70 with the OHRQoL of children and families, respectively. The avulsion variable showed 9.65- and 8.25-times greater chance of influencing the OHRQoL of children and families, respectively. The experience of caries showed 3.80- and 2.42-times greater chance of influencing the OHRQoL of children and families, respectively. Conclusions: Dental trauma did not influence OHRQoL of children and their families negatively. However, avulsion and caries experience in low-income families was associated with a negative perception of OHRQoL.
RESUMO Objetivo: Avaliar a influência do traumatismo dentário na qualidade de vida relacionada à saúde bucal (QVRSB) de crianças e suas famílias. Métodos: 571 crianças de 5 anos de idade foram aleatoriamente selecionadas de escolas públicas. O trauma foi avaliado clinicamente de acordo com a classificação de Andreasen. A experiência de cárie na região anterior e a presença de overjet foram determinadas com base nos critérios da Organização Mundial da Saúde. A versão brasileira do questionário ECOHIS (Escala de Impacto na Saúde Oral na Primeira Infância) avaliou a QVRSB e foi respondida pelos pais; além disso, foram avaliados aspectos socioeconômicos. Realizou-se uma regressão logística simples, bem como as razões de chances brutas com os respectivos intervalos de confiança de 95%. As variáveis com p <0,20 foram testadas nos modelos de regressão logística múltipla, e aquelas com p≤0,05 permaneceram no modelo. Resultados: A renda mostrou uma magnitude de associação de 1,56 e 2,70 com a QVRSB das crianças e famílias, respectivamente. A variável avulsão apresentou chance 9,65 e 8,25 vezes maior de influenciar a QVRSB de crianças e famílias, respectivamente. A experiência de cárie mostrou chance 3,80 e 2,42 vezes maior de influenciar a QVRSB de crianças e famílias, respectivamente. Conclusões: O trauma dental não influenciou negativamente a QVRSB das crianças e suas famílias. Entretanto, especificamente a avulsão, e a experiência de cárie nos dentes anteriores em famílias de baixa renda estiveram associadas a uma percepção negativa da QVRSB.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Child, Preschool , Quality of Life , Tooth Injuries/psychology , Dental Caries/psychology , Malocclusion/psychology , Parents/psychology , Oral Health , Cross-Sectional Studies , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
Case report: This article presents the case of an 11-year-old patient who sought orthodontic treatment, complaining of crooked teeth. In anamnesis, an emotional and physical dependence was reported regarding the act of breastfeeding. Considerations on the diagnosis, psychological implications, and clinical approach in this rare case were addressed. An orthodontic treatment and myofunctional therapy were performed to resolve the occlusal and functional aspects of the patient. Psychological therapy for the child and her mother was required to handle emotional sequelae. Conclusion: Multidisciplinary treatment was prescribed. Dentists should be aware of this need in cases of patients with special characteristics for treatment beyond oral problems. In orthodontics, this may be the difference between effective treatment outcomes or not.
Relato de caso: Este artigo apresenta o caso de uma paciente de 11 anos que procurou tratamento ortodôntico com queixa de "dentes tortos". Na anamnese, foi relatada dependência emocional e física da criança em relação ao ato de amamentar. Considerações sobre diagnóstico, implicações psicológicas, abordagem clínica neste raro caso foram abordadas. Foi realizado tratamento ortodôntico e terapia miofuncional para resolução dos aspectos oclusais e funcionais do paciente. Um acompanhamento psicológico para crianças e sua mãe foi necessária para abordar sequelas emocionais inerentes. Conclusão: Um tratamento multiprofissional foi instituído e o dentista deve estar atento a essa necessidade nos casos de pacientes com características especiais, visando uma abordagem além dos problemas bucais. Na Ortodontia, essa pode ser a diferença entre os resultados eficazes do tratamento ou não.
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Child , Orthodontics, Corrective , Breast Feeding/adverse effects , Deglutition Disorders/therapy , Myofunctional Therapy , Malocclusion/psychology , Dental Care for Children , Dental Occlusion , Mother-Child RelationsABSTRACT
Objective: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of dentalcaries and malocclusion in Brazilian adolescents on the oral health-related qualityof life (OHRQoL) of their families. Methods: A representative cross-sectional studywas conducted with 1168 adolescents from Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil,and their families. Parents/caregivers answered the Brazilian version of the FamilyImpact Scale (B-FIS) to assess the impact of oral conditions on the OHRQoL of thefamilies. Malocclusion was diagnosed using the Dental Aesthetic Index. Dentalcaries was diagnosed using the DMFT index. Three examiners who had undergonetraining and calibration exercises performed the clinical examinations. Sex, ageand social vulnerability of the adolescents were considered confounding variables.Data analysis was performed using bivariate and multivariate Poisson regressionanalysis with robust variance (p<0.05). Results: The analysis adjusted by sex, ageand social vulnerability demonstrated that families of adolescents with untreateddental caries had 29% more impact on Parental/Family Activity (95% CI: 1.11-1.50), 28% on Parental Emotions (95% CI: 1.09-1.51) and 34% on Family Conflict(95% CI: 1.09-1.65) than those without caries. When adjusted for sex and age,malocclusion was associated with Financial Burden (PR=1.39; 95%CI=1.01-1.65),but this variable lost its significance when social vulnerability was included in themultivariate model (PR=1.27; 95% CI: 0.99-1.64). Conclusion: Untreated dentalcaries in adolescents exerted a negative impact on the OHRQoL of their families.Social vulnerability exerted an influence on the impact of malocclusion on theOHRQoL of the families.
Objetivo: O objetivo do presente estudo foi avaliar o impacto da cárie dentária e damá oclusão em adolescentes brasileiros na qualidade de vida relacionada à saúdebucal (QVRSB) de suas famílias. Métodos: Foi realizado um estudo transversalrepresentativo com 1168 adolescentes de Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil, e suasfamílias. Os pais/responsáveis responderam à versão brasileira da Family ImpactScale (B-FIS) para avaliar o impacto das condições bucais na QVRSB das famílias. Amá oclusão foi diagnosticada pelo Índice de Estética Dental e a cárie dentária peloíndice CPOD. Três examinadores calibrados realizaram exames clínicos. Sexo, idadee vulnerabilidade social dos adolescentes foram coletadas como variáveis de confusão.A análise dos dados foi realizada por meio de análise de regressão de Poisson bivariadae multivariada com variância robusta (p<0,05). Resultados: Resultados ajustados porsexo, idade e vulnerabilidade social demonstraram que famílias de adolescentes comcárie dentária não tratada tiveram 29% mais impacto na Atividade Parental/Familiar(IC95% = 1,11-1,50), 28% nas Emoções Parentais (IC95% = 1,09-1,51) e 34% em ConflitoFamiliar (IC 95% = 1,09-1,65) do que aqueles sem cárie. Quando ajustada para sexo eidade, a má oclusão foi associada ao Encargo Financeiro (RP = 1,39; IC95% = 1,01-1,65); entretanto, perdeu significância quando a vulnerabilidade social foi incluída nomodelo multivariado (RP = 1,27; IC95% = 0,99-1,64). Conclusão: A cárie dentária nãotratada em adolescentes exerceu impacto negativo na QVRSB de suas famílias. Avulnerabilidade social influenciou a ausência de impacto da má oclusão na QVRSBdas famílias.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Child , Adolescent , Parent-Child Relations , Quality of Life , Oral Health , Dental Caries/psychology , Malocclusion/psychology , DMF Index , Cross-Sectional Studies , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of dental trauma on oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) of children and their families. METHODS: A total of 571 children aged five years were randomly selected at public schools. Trauma was clinically evaluated in accordance with the Andreasen classification. Caries experience in the anterior region and increased overjet were determined according to the World Health Organization criteria. The Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale (ECOHIS) was answered by the parents and used to evaluate OHRQoL. In addition, this questionnaire has aspects related to socioeconomic status. Simple logistic regression was performed, and the raw Odds Ratios with the respective 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were estimated. The variables with p<0.20 were tested in multiple logistic regression models, and those with p≤0.05 remained in the model and the adjusted odds ratio with respective 95%CI was estimated. RESULTS: Income showed a magnitude of association of 1.56 and 2.70 with the OHRQoL of children and families, respectively. The avulsion variable showed 9.65- and 8.25-times greater chance of influencing the OHRQoL of children and families, respectively. The experience of caries showed 3.80- and 2.42-times greater chance of influencing the OHRQoL of children and families, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Dental trauma did not influence OHRQoL of children and their families negatively. However, avulsion and caries experience in low-income families was associated with a negative perception of OHRQoL.
Subject(s)
Dental Caries/psychology , Malocclusion/psychology , Quality of Life , Tooth Injuries/psychology , Child, Preschool , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Oral Health , Parents/psychology , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
Objective: To compare the crowding of anterior teeth in schoolchildren with and without experience of bullying. Materials and Methods: A prospective, cross-sectional, comparative and observational study was conducted in two educational institutions, one public and one private; The sample consisted of 218 schoolchildren between 11 and 16 years of age. Dental crowding was evaluated in the upper and lower anterior sector using Little's irregularity index. To diagnose bullying, a previously validated questionnaire was applied, with dichotomized questions. The comparison between crowding in patients with and without experience of bullying was evaluated with the U-Mann Whitney statistical test. Results:Statistically significant differences in the amount of crowding (p<0.05) were found. The average crowding for the group subjected to bullying was 11.6 +/- 9.4 mm and in the group without bullying was 9.1+/- 7.9 mm. Conclusion: There was a higher amount of dental crowding in schoolchildren subjected to bullying compared to schoolchildren with no bullying.
Objetivo: Comparar el apiñamiento de dientes anteriores en escolares con y sin experiencia de acoso escolar (bullying). Material y Métodos: Se realizó un estudio prospectivo, transversal, comparativo y observacional en dos instituciones educativas, una pública y otra privada; La muestra estuvo conformada por en 218 escolares entre 11 y 16 años de edad. El apiñamiento dental se evaluó en el sector anterior superior e inferior utilizando el índice de irregularidad de Little. Para diagnosticar acoso escolar, se aplicó un cuestionario validado previamente, con preguntas dicotomizadas. La comparación entre el apiñamiento en pacientes con y sin experiencia de acoso escolar se evaluó con la prueba estadística U-Mann Whitney. Resultados: Se encontraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas la cantidad de apiñamiento (p<0.05). El apiñamiento promedio para el grupo sometido a acoso escolar fue de 11.6 +/- 9.4 mm y en el grupo sin acoso escolar fue de 9.1 +/- 7.9 mm. Conclusion: Hubo un mayor grado de apiñamiento dental en los escolares sometidos al acoso escolar en comparación con los escolares sin acoso escolar.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Child , Adolescent , Bullying , Malocclusion/psychology , Peru , Cross-Sectional Studies , Prospective Studies , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The Malocclusion Impact Questionnaire (MIQ) is a condition-specific measure that assesses the impact of malocclusion on Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL). The aim of this study was to cross-culturally adapt the original version of MIQ into Spanish and to assess the acceptability, reliability and validity of this version in the Chilean population. METHODS: The MIQ was cross-culturally adapted for the Spanish language for Chile using recommended standards for the linguistic validation of instruments. To assess its psychometric properties, a cross-sectional study was carried out with 219 children aged 10 to 16 years from public schools in Puerto Montt, Chile, who completed the Chilean versions of the MIQ (MIQCh) and the Child Perceptions Questionnaire 11-14 (CPQ11-14). The presence and severity of malocclusions was determined through the Dental Aesthetic Index by a trained dentist. The MIQ was administrated a second time two weeks later. The reliability of the scale was assessed by analysis of its internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) and reproducibility (Intraclass correlation coefficient - ICC). The validity of the construct was assessed by confirmatory factor analysis and known groups method. Criterion validity was assessed by calculating the Spearman correlation with the CPQ11-14. RESULTS: The content comparison of the back-translation with the original MIQ showed that all items except two were conceptually and linguistically equivalent. The cognitive debriefing showed a suitable understanding of the Chilean version. The MIQCh demonstrated good reliability, with Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.85 and ICC of 0.91. A moderate correlation was found between the MIQCh and CPQ11-14 (0.58). In the known groups comparison, children who felt that their teeth bothered them and/or affected their life obtained significantly higher scores on the MIQCh. The OHRQoL was worse when the severity of the malocclusion was greater (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: The results support the applicability, reliability and validity of the Spanish version of MIQ for assessing OHRQoL in Chilean children with malocclusions.
Subject(s)
Malocclusion/psychology , Quality of Life/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards , Adolescent , Child , Chile , Cross-Cultural Comparison , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Psychometrics/instrumentation , Reproducibility of Results , TranslationsABSTRACT
Satisfaction with dental aesthetics is a subjective indicator used in epidemiological studies and is related to health behaviours. Little is known about the factors that influence this indicator, particularly among adolescents who live in a situation of social vulnerability. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between malocclusion and dental appearance in underprivileged Brazilian adolescents. This analytical cross-sectional study was conducted in Piracicaba, Brazil, and evaluated 884 adolescents from 13 to 19 years of age. The dependent variable was satisfaction with dental appearance, and the independent variables were classified as individual (components of the Dental Aesthetic Index - DAI, sex and age) and contextual (social exclusion index). For statistical analysis, multilevel regression models were estimated. The individual variables were considered Level 1, and the contextual variable was considered Level 2, with a level of significance of 5%. The mean age of the adolescents was 15.3 years. Female adolescents more frequently affirmed that they were satisfied with their dental appearance than did male individuals. There was an increase in dissatisfaction with oral health with the increase in anterior maxillary overjet, midline diastema, larger anterior irregularity in the maxilla, larger anterior irregularity in the mandible, anterior open bite and antero-posterior molar relation. Satisfaction with dental appearance was associated with individual factors such as sex and DAI components.
Subject(s)
Esthetics, Dental/psychology , Malocclusion/psychology , Self Concept , Adolescent , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Patient Satisfaction , Sex Factors , Socioeconomic Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young AdultABSTRACT
Aim: To evaluate the association between malocclusion severity and psychosocial issues among Brazilian adolescents. Methods: The study sample consisted of 120 adolescents between 11 and 12 years, patients at the Dental School of the Federal University of Minas Gerais. Psychosocial issues were assessed by means of two questions, through which the adolescents were asked about whether a classmate had teased or called them names due to the condition of their teeth, or whether the adolescents had felt upset due to their teeth. The higher the response scores the greater the psychosocial impact. Malocclusion was evaluated with the Dental Aest-hetic. Index, with assignment of individuals to the following sub-groups: mild malocclusion (DAI≤25), moderate malocclusion (DAI=2630), definite malocclusion (DAI=3135) and severe malocclusion (DAI≥36). Results: Adolescents' mean age was 11.50 years. The more severe the malocclusion the greater the frequency of episodes of teasing or name-calling because of the condition of the teeth (p=0.010), and the greater the frequency of episodes when the adolescents had felt upset due to their teeth (p=0.001). Individuals with severe malocclusion had a higher frequency of episodes during which they were teased or called names due to the condition of their teeth when compared to individuals with mild malocclusion (p=0.013). Individuals with severe malocclusion had a higher frequency of episodes in which they felt upset due to their teeth when compared to individuals with mild malocclusion (p<0.001), individuals with moderate malocclusion (p=0.002), and those with defined malocclusion (p=0.001). Conclusion: Severe malocclusion was associated with psychosocial issues among adolescents.
Objetivo: Evaluar la asociación entre la gravedad de la maloclusión y los problemas psicosociales en adolescentes brasileños. Métodos: La muestra de estudio consistió en 120 adolescentes entre 11 y 12 años, pacientes de la Escuela de Odontología de la Universidad Federal de Minas Gerais. Los problemas psicosociales se evaluaron mediante dos preguntas, a través de las cuales se preguntó a los adolescentes si un compañero de clase se había burlado de ellos o les habían insultado debido a la condición de sus dientes, o si los adolescentes se habían sentido molestos debido a sus dientes. Cuanto mayor la puntuación de la respuesta, mayor el impacto psicosocial. La maloclusión se evaluó con el Índice de Estética Dental y se asignó los siguientes subgrupos: maloclusión leve (DAI≤25), maloclusión moderada (DAI=26-30), maloclusión definida (DAI=31-35) y maloclusión grave (DAI≥36). Resultados: la edad media de los adolescentes fue de 11,50 años. Cuanto más grave la maloclusión, mayor la frecuencia de episodios de burlas o insultos debido a la condición de los dientes (p=0.010) y mayor la frecuencia de episodios cuando el adolescente se ha sentido molesto debido a sus dientes (p=0.001). Las personas con maloclusión severa tuvieron una mayor frecuencia de episodios durante los cuales fueron objeto de burlas o se les insultó y les dio nombres debido a la condición de sus dientes en comparación con las personas con maloclusión leve (p=0.013). Los individuos con maloclusión severa tuvieron una mayor frecuencia de episodios en los que se sintieron molestos debido a sus dientes en comparación con individuos con maloclusión leve (p<0,001), individuos con maloclusión moderada (p=0,002) y aquellos con maloclusión definida (p=0.001). Conclusión: la maloclusión grave se asoció con problemas psicosociales en adolescentes.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Child , Psychology, Adolescent , Malocclusion/psychology , Brazil , Surveys and Questionnaires , Psychosocial Impact , Adolescent Development , Esthetics, Dental/psychologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the qualitative occlusal changes in individuals with normal occlusion during a period of 47 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The sample comprised dental models of 20 subjects with normal occlusion (8 males; 12 females) taken at 13.2 years (T1) and 60.9 years of age (T2). The occlusal features were evaluated with the objective grading system (OGS) and with the six keys to normal occlusion (SKNO). The subjects also answered a questionnaire on the aesthetic and occlusal self-perception at T2. Comparisons from T1 to T2 were performed with paired t- and McNemar tests (P less than 0.05). RESULTS: OGS analysis showed a significant improvement in the marginal ridge levelling and tooth buccolingual inclination. There was a significant deterioration of the antero-posterior occlusal relationship from T1 to T2. Subjects without tooth loss showed a dental alignment worsening between time points. The marginal ridges, buccolingual inclination, and interproximal contacts improved. The SKNO analysis showed a significant deterioration of the maxillary second molars buccolingual inclination and an improvement of the maxillary second molar angulation. All patients were satisfied with their smiles, and 60 per cent of the subjects had no complaints. Dental crowding caused dissatisfaction in 35 per cent of the sample. LIMITATIONS: A limitation of this study was the high prevalence of tooth loss in the sample from T1 to T2. Only 30 per cent of the subjects had no tooth loss in T2. CONCLUSIONS: The aging process slightly deteriorates some occlusal features of individuals with normal occlusion. However, most individuals were satisfied with their aesthetics and occlusal comfort at the sixth decade of life.
Subject(s)
Aging/physiology , Dental Occlusion , Adolescent , Aging/pathology , Esthetics, Dental , Female , Humans , Male , Malocclusion/pathology , Malocclusion/psychology , Middle Aged , Models, Dental , Molar/anatomy & histology , Self Concept , Smiling/psychology , Tooth/anatomy & histologyABSTRACT
Abstract Satisfaction with dental aesthetics is a subjective indicator used in epidemiological studies and is related to health behaviours. Little is known about the factors that influence this indicator, particularly among adolescents who live in a situation of social vulnerability. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between malocclusion and dental appearance in underprivileged Brazilian adolescents. This analytical cross-sectional study was conducted in Piracicaba, Brazil, and evaluated 884 adolescents from 13 to 19 years of age. The dependent variable was satisfaction with dental appearance, and the independent variables were classified as individual (components of the Dental Aesthetic Index - DAI, sex and age) and contextual (social exclusion index). For statistical analysis, multilevel regression models were estimated. The individual variables were considered Level 1, and the contextual variable was considered Level 2, with a level of significance of 5%. The mean age of the adolescents was 15.3 years. Female adolescents more frequently affirmed that they were satisfied with their dental appearance than did male individuals. There was an increase in dissatisfaction with oral health with the increase in anterior maxillary overjet, midline diastema, larger anterior irregularity in the maxilla, larger anterior irregularity in the mandible, anterior open bite and antero-posterior molar relation. Satisfaction with dental appearance was associated with individual factors such as sex and DAI components.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Young Adult , Self Concept , Esthetics, Dental/psychology , Malocclusion/psychology , Socioeconomic Factors , Sex Factors , Cross-Sectional Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Patient SatisfactionABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale (ECOHIS) measures the impact of dental diseases on Oral Health-Related Quality of Life both in children and their families. The aim of this study was to develop a Chilean Spanish version of the ECOHIS that is conceptually equivalent to the original and to assess its acceptability, reliability and validity in the preschool population of Chile. METHODS: The Chilean version of the ECOHIS was obtained through a process including forward and back-translation, expert panel, and cognitive debriefing interviews. To assess metric properties, a cross-sectional study was carried out in Carahue, Southern Chile (April-October 2016). Children younger than six years old without systemic diseases, disabilities or chronic medication from eleven public preschools were included. Parents were invited to complete the Chilean version of the ECOHIS, PedsQL™4.0 Generic Core and PedsQL Oral Health scales, and to answer global questions about their children's general and oral health. A subsample was administrated ECOHIS a second time 14-21 days after. A clinical examination was performed to assess dental caries, malocclusion, and traumatic dental injuries. Reliability was evaluated using measures of internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) and reproducibility (Intraclass correlation coefficient - ICC). Construct validity was assessed by testing hypotheses based on available evidence about known groups and relationships between different instruments. RESULTS: The content comparison of the back-translation with the original ECOHIS showed that all items except one were conceptually and linguistically equivalent. The cognitive debriefing showed a suitable understanding of the Chilean version by the parents. In the total sample (n = 302), the ECOHIS total score median was 1 (IQR 6), floor effect was 41.6%, and ceiling effect 0%. Cronbach's alpha was 0.89 and the ICC was 0.84. The correlation between ECOHIS and PedsQL™4.0 Generic Core was weak (r = 0.21), while it was strong-moderate (r = 0.64) with the PedsQL Oral Health scale. In the known groups comparison, the ECOHIS total score was statistically higher in children with poor than excellent/very good oral health (median 11.6 vs 0, p < 0.01), and in the high severity than in the caries-free group (median 8 vs 0.5, p < 0.01). No differences were found according to malocclusion and traumatic dental injuries groups. CONCLUSIONS: These results supported the feasibility, reliability and validity of the Chilean version of ECOHIS questionnaire for preschool children through proxy.