Efficacy of selective mineralocorticoid and glucocorticoid agonists in canine septic shock.

OBJECTIVE: Corticosteroid regimens that stimulate both mineralocorticoid and glucocorticoid pathways consistently reverse vasopressor-dependent hypotension in septic shock but have variable effects on survival. The objective of this study was to determine whether exogenous mineralocorticoid and glucocorticoid treatments have distinct effects and whether the timing of administration alters their effects in septic shock. DESIGN, SETTING, SUBJECTS, AND INTERVENTIONS: Desoxycorticosterone, a selective mineralocorticoid agonist; dexamethasone, a selective glucocorticoid agonist; and placebo were administered either several days before (prophylactic) or immediately after (therapeutic) infectious challenge and continued for 96 hrs in 74 canines with staphylococcal pneumonia. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Effects of desoxycorticosterone and dexamethasone were different and opposite depending on timing of administration for survival (p = .05); fluid requirements (p = .05); central venous pressures (p ≤ .007); indicators of hemoconcentration (i.e., sodium [p = .0004], albumin [p = .05], and platelet counts [p = .02]); interleukin-6 levels (p = .04); and cardiac dysfunction (p = .05). Prophylactic desoxycorticosterone treatment significantly improved survival, shock, and all the other outcomes stated, but therapeutic desoxycorticosterone did not. Conversely, prophylactic dexamethasone was much less effective for improving these outcomes compared with therapeutic dexamethasone with the exception of shock reversal. Prophylactic dexamethasone given before sepsis induction also significantly reduced serum aldosterone and cortisol levels and increased body temperature and lactate levels compared with therapeutic dexamethasone (p ≤ .05), consistent with adrenal suppression. CONCLUSIONS: In septic shock, mineralocorticoids are only beneficial if given prophylactically, whereas glucocorticoids are most beneficial when given close to the onset of infection. Prophylactic mineralocorticoids should be further investigated in patients at high risk to develop sepsis, whereas glucocorticoids should only be administered therapeutically to prevent adrenal suppression and worse outcomes.

Aldosterone requires vasopressin V1a receptors on intercalated cells to mediate acid-base homeostasis.

Both aldosterone and luminal vasopressin may contribute to the maintenance of acid-base homeostasis, but the functional relationship between these hormones is not well understood. The effects of luminal vasopressin likely result from its interaction with V1a receptors on the luminal membranes of intercalated cells in the collecting duct. Here, we found that mice lacking the V1a receptor exhibit type 4 renal tubular acidosis. The administration of the mineralocorticoid agonist fludrocortisone ameliorated the acidosis by restoring excretion of urinary ammonium via increased expression of Rhcg and H-K-ATPase and decreased expression of H-ATPase. In a cell line of intercalated cells established from transgenic rats expressing the mineralocorticoid and V1a receptors, but not V2 receptors, knockdown of the V1a receptor gene abrogated the effects of aldosterone on H-K-ATPase, Rhcg, and H-ATPase expression. These data suggest that defects in the vasopressin V1a receptor in intercalated cells can cause type 4 renal tubular acidosis and that the tubular effects of aldosterone depend on a functional V1a receptor in the intercalated cells.

Mechanistic aspects of mineralocorticoid receptor activation.

Aldosterone exerts its biological effects through binding to mineralocorticoid receptor (MR). Ligand binding induces a receptor transconformation within the ligand-binding domain and dissociation of associated proteins from the receptor. The ligand-activated receptor binds as a dimer to the response elements present in the promoter region of target genes and initiates the transcription through specific interactions with the transcription machinery. The glucocorticoid hormone cortisol binds to the human MR (hMR) with the same affinity as aldosterone, but is less efficient than aldosterone in stimulating the hMR transactivation. The antimineralocorticoid spirolactones also bind to the hMR but induce a receptor conformation that is transcriptionally silent. In this report, we describe the key residues involved in the recognition of agonist and antagonist ligands and propose a two-step model with a dynamic dimension for the MR activation. In its unliganded state, MR is in an opened conformation in which folding into the ligand-binding competent state requires both the heat shock protein 90 and the C-terminal part of the receptor. An intermediate complex is generated by ligand binding, leading to a more compact receptor conformation. This transient complex is then converted to a transcriptionally active conformation in which stability depends on the steroid-receptor contacts.

Effect of fludrocortisone and spironolactone on sodium and potassium losses in secretory diarrhea.

The response of the colon to aldosterone is believed to be an important adaptive mechanism to excessive sodium losses in diarrhea. However, the degree to which mineralocorticoid activity actually influences fecal output of sodium in people with diarrhea is unknown. To gain insight into this question, 10 normal people were treated with placebo, fludrocortisone (an aldosterone agonist), and spironolactone (an aldosterone antagonist) during three experimental periods lasting nine days. On days 5-8, diarrhea was induced by ingestion of phenolphthalein. Diet was controlled. Fecal sodium was 40 meq/day on placebo and 29 meq/day on fludrocortisone, consistent with mineralocorticoid stimulation of intestinal sodium absorption. However, contrary to our expectations, spironolactone therapy was also associated with a fall in fecal sodium output, to 28 meq/day. To explain this paradoxical effect of spironolactone, we suggest that sodium depletion caused by spironolactone's natriuretic action on the kidney caused the release of an unknown stimulant of intestinal sodium absorption, whose action more than overcame the reduced colonic absorption resulting from inhibition of aldosterone activity by spironolactone. This interpretation implies that the intestinal adaptation to sodium depletion in diarrhea involves both aldosterone and an aldosterone independent factor, working in concert to reduce fecal sodium output.