ABSTRACT
Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a rare neuromuscular junction disorder that is characterized by fatigable weakness of muscles. People with MG experience various clinical manifestations based on the muscles involved. MG can be autoimmune, paraneoplastic, congenital, medication-related, or transient in the neonatal period due to the passive placental transfer of antibodies from mothers with MG. Acetylcholine receptor antibodies are seen in the majority of patients with MG. However, other antibodies have been discovered in the last 20 years, including muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK) and lipoprotein-related peptide 4 (LRP4), and are now available through commercial testing. More recently, a handful of other antibodies have been associated with MG; however, they are not presently available for routine testing. A disease classification system has been developed by the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) and is commonly used worldwide. A number of objective and subjective outcome measures have been developed and validated over the years and have been proven useful for both clinical and research purposes, serving as primary and secondary outcome measures in most clinical trials. A growing number of therapies are available for both acute and chronic management of MG, with several new mechanistic approaches under investigation. An international consensus guidance for the management of MG was first published in 2016 and updated in 2020.
Subject(s)
Myasthenia Gravis , Myasthenia Gravis/diagnosis , Myasthenia Gravis/therapy , Humans , Autoantibodies/immunology , Receptors, Cholinergic/immunologyABSTRACT
Myasthenia gravis (MG) stands as a prototypical antibody-mediated autoimmune disease: it is dependent on T cells and characterized by the presence of autoantibodies targeting proteins located on the postsynaptic surface of skeletal muscle, known as the neuromuscular junction. Patients with MG exhibit a spectrum of weakness, ranging from limited ocular muscle involvement to life-threatening respiratory failure. Recent decades have witnessed substantial progress in understanding the underlying pathophysiology, leading to the delineation of distinct subcategories within MG, including MG linked to AChR or MuSK antibodies as well as age-based distinction, thymoma-associated, and immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced MG. This heightened understanding has paved the way for the development of more precise and targeted therapeutic interventions. Notably, the FDA has recently approved therapeutic inhibitors of complement and the IgG receptor FcRn, a testament to our improved comprehension of autoantibody effector mechanisms in MG. In this Review, we delve into the various subgroups of MG, stratified by age, autoantibody type, and histology of the thymus with neoplasms. Furthermore, we explore both current and potential emerging therapeutic strategies, shedding light on the evolving landscape of MG treatment.
Subject(s)
Autoantibodies , Myasthenia Gravis , Myasthenia Gravis/immunology , Myasthenia Gravis/therapy , Myasthenia Gravis/pathology , Humans , Autoantibodies/immunology , Receptors, Cholinergic/immunology , Thymoma/immunology , Thymoma/pathology , Thymoma/therapy , Histocompatibility Antigens Class I/immunology , Receptors, Fc/immunology , Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases/immunology , Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases/antagonists & inhibitorsABSTRACT
Recent advances in neuroimmunology have shed light on the pathogenic mechanisms underlying rare neuroimmunologic conditions such as myasthenia gravis (MG) and stiff person syndrome (SPS). Despite the rarity of these conditions, their complex manifestations and potential for irreversible disability necessitate effective therapeutic strategies. This chapter reviews the current understanding of the safety and efficacy of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in MG and SPS. Several case reports and retrospective studies have demonstrated promising outcomes following HSCT in refractory MG and SPS, with significant clinical improvement and even discontinuation of chronic immunomodulatory therapy in some cases. Furthermore, HSCT may offer insights into the underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms of these conditions, particularly the role of cellular immunity. Although more research is needed to fully understand the impact of HSCT on disease pathology and outcomes, current evidence suggests that HSCT could be a valuable therapeutic option for patients with refractory MG and SPS.
Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Myasthenia Gravis , Stiff-Person Syndrome , Stiff-Person Syndrome/therapy , Humans , Myasthenia Gravis/therapy , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methodsABSTRACT
Mechanical ventilation in myasthenic crisis is not standardized and is at high risk of failure. We investigated liberation from mechanical ventilation during myasthenic crisis using a prolonged spontaneous breathing trials (SBT) and sequential pulmonary function tests (PFT). In this retrospective monocenter study, we included patients admitted for a first episode of myasthenic crisis between January 2001 and January 2018. The primary outcome was the incidence of weaning failure upon first extubation in our cohort of patients with MC. Secondary objectives were to determine risk factors and outcome associated with weaning failure upon first extubation in MC. We also compared the characteristics of patients with prolonged weaning. 126 episodes of MC were analyzed. Patient's age was 64 [42-76] years with 72/126 (56.5%) being women. The median delay between weaning initiation and first extubation was 6 [3-10] days and the median total length of MV was 14 [10-23] days. 118/126 (93.7%) patients underwent prolonged SBT of 8 h or more prior to first extubation. The overall weaning failure rate was 18/126 (14.3%). Extubation was more often successful when the factor precipitating the myasthenic crisis was identified (86/108 (79.6%) vs. 8/18 (44.4%); p = 0.004), whereas PFT was similar in failure or successes. Most weaning failures upon first extubation attempt (11/18; 61%) were attributed to an insufficient stabilization of myasthenia gravis. Duration of mechanical ventilation, an infectious trigger and maximal inspiratory pressure upon intubation were independent risk factors for prolonged weaning. In myasthenic crisis, a standardized protocol including prolonged SBT and respiratory function tests might improve the success of first extubation without prolonging mechanical ventilation. The results of this single center study warrant further evaluation in interventional trials.
Subject(s)
Myasthenia Gravis , Respiration, Artificial , Ventilator Weaning , Humans , Female , Male , Myasthenia Gravis/therapy , Myasthenia Gravis/physiopathology , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Aged , Adult , Respiration, Artificial/methods , Respiration, Artificial/adverse effects , Respiratory Function Tests , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is used as an effective treatment modality for a variety of autoimmune disorders. Apart from its desired effect of removing pathological blood components, it also can remove coagulation factors and drugs. Currently, there is an insufficient amount of information regarding the use of direct oral anticoagulants in this setting. In this article, we present a case report of a patient with myasthenia gravis and chronic anticoagulation with apixaban who underwent a series of TPE while continuing apixaban treatment. We observed that only 10% of daily dose was removed by the procedure and plasma levels of apixaban corresponded with expected range. TPE was not associated with shortened drug plasma half-life. We did not observe any significant alteration of apixaban pharmacokinetics during the period of TPE therapy, as well as no thrombotic or bleeding events. This case report supports the use of apixaban in patients treated by TPE, nevertheless, to firmly establish apixaban efficacy and safety profile in this clinical setting further research is needed.
Subject(s)
Factor Xa Inhibitors , Plasma Exchange , Pyrazoles , Pyridones , Humans , Pyridones/administration & dosage , Pyrazoles/administration & dosage , Pyrazoles/pharmacokinetics , Plasma Exchange/methods , Factor Xa Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Myasthenia Gravis/drug therapy , Myasthenia Gravis/therapy , Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Female , Middle Aged , Half-Life , Male , AgedABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To compare the differential impact of recombinant protein A immunoadsorption (PAIA) or therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) on neurological functional improvement and quality of life in patients afflicted with severe acute neuroimmune diseases, including Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), myasthenia gravis (MG), neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD), and anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis (NMDARE). METHODS: The retrospective study included 29 patients with moderate to severe disability (modified Rankin scale, mRS≥3) due to acute neuroimmune diseases at the second Xiangya hospital from January 2021 to January 2023. The clinical efficacy of PAIA and TPE in improving neurological function (ΔmRS≥1) and the difference in favorable functional outcomes (mRS 0-2) at three months were evaluated. The impact of both treatments on patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was assessed using a visual analog scale (EQ-VAS) score ranging from 0 to 100. RESULTS: The findings revealed that the PAIA group exhibited a significantly higher rate of improvement in modified Rankin scale (mRS) scores (ΔmRS≥1) at the three-month follow-up compared to the TPE group (94.4 % vs. 54.5 %, p = 0.018). However, no statistically significant difference was observed between the two treatment modalities in terms of favorable neurological functional outcomes at the three-month mark. Furthermore, the PAIA group demonstrated a significantly higher EQ-VAS score at 14 days post-treatment compared to the TPE group (60.0 vs. 47.7, p = 0.017). CONCLUSION: In the short-term management of severe acute neuroimmune diseases, PAIA may present a greater probability of improving neurological function and facilitating an earlier enhancement of quality of life compared to TPE.
Subject(s)
Plasma Exchange , Quality of Life , Humans , Plasma Exchange/methods , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Adult , Immunosorbent Techniques , Recovery of Function , Treatment Outcome , Guillain-Barre Syndrome/therapy , Guillain-Barre Syndrome/immunology , Aged , Myasthenia Gravis/therapy , Myasthenia Gravis/immunology , Young AdultABSTRACT
Myasthenia gravis is a well-understood autoimmune disease of the neuromuscular synapse that is medicinally treatable with favorable results and therefore should not be overlooked in the differential diagnostic evaluation of vertical diplopia. Myasthenia is primarily a clinical diagnosis. Positive indications include double vision of fluctuating severity, diurnal variations, double vision after lengthy gaze fixation on a distant object and in the primary position as well as diplopia in various visual directions, often associated with a varying extent of ptosis. Clinical tests are the Simpson test, the ice on eyes test and the probatory administration of pyridostigmine. Positive results corroborate this diagnosis but negative results do not exclude myasthenia. The same applies for the determination of specific autoantibodies. In addition to ocular symptoms it is important to search for generalized symptoms and bulbopharyngeal symptoms in particular should prompt immediate neurological diagnostics. In addition to symptomatic treatment a wide range of immunotherapeutic agents are available. Thymectomy is also used for immunomodulatory indications according to the 2023 revised guidelines. Patient-centered treatment goals, patient education and comprehensive information, also via the self-help organization German Myasthenia Society, are essential components of successful treatment of myasthenia.
Subject(s)
Diplopia , Myasthenia Gravis , Humans , Diplopia/etiology , Diplopia/diagnosis , Myasthenia Gravis/diagnosis , Myasthenia Gravis/therapy , Myasthenia Gravis/complications , Aged , Diagnosis, Differential , Aged, 80 and over , Thymectomy , Female , MaleABSTRACT
Myasthenia Gravis (MG) is a chronic disabling autoimmune disease caused by autoantibodies to the neuromuscular junction (NMJ), characterized clinically by fluctuating weakness and early fatigability of ocular, skeletal and bulbar muscles. Despite being commonly considered a prototypic autoimmune disorder, MG is a complex and heterogeneous condition, presenting with variable clinical phenotypes, likely due to distinct pathophysiological settings related with different immunoreactivities, symptoms' distribution, disease severity, age at onset, thymic histopathology and response to therapies. Current treatment of MG based on international consensus guidelines allows to effectively control symptoms, but most patients do not reach complete stable remission and require life-long immunosuppressive (IS) therapies. Moreover, a proportion of them is refractory to conventional IS treatment, highlighting the need for more specific and tailored strategies. Precision medicine is a new frontier of medicine that promises to greatly increase therapeutic success in several diseases, including autoimmune conditions. In MG, B cell activation, antibody recycling and NMJ damage by the complement system are crucial mechanisms, and their targeting by innovative biological drugs has been proven to be effective and safe in clinical trials. The switch from conventional IS to novel precision medicine approaches based on these drugs could prospectively and significantly improve MG care. In this review, we provide an overview of key immunopathogenetic processes underlying MG, and discuss on emerging biological drugs targeting them. We also discuss on future direction of research to address the need for patients' stratification in endotypes according with genetic and molecular biomarkers for successful clinical decision making within precision medicine workflow.
Subject(s)
Autoantibodies , Myasthenia Gravis , Precision Medicine , Humans , Myasthenia Gravis/immunology , Myasthenia Gravis/therapy , Myasthenia Gravis/drug therapy , Myasthenia Gravis/diagnosis , Autoantibodies/immunology , Autoimmunity , Animals , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Neuromuscular Junction/immunologyABSTRACT
Myasthenia gravis (MG) is one of the most well characterised autoimmune disorders affecting the neuromuscular junction with autoantibodies targeting the acetylcholine receptor (AChR) complex. The vast majority of patients present with ocular symptoms including double vision and ptosis, but may progress on to develop generalised fatiguable muscle weakness. Severe involvement of the bulbar muscles can lead to dysphagia, dysarthria and breathing difficulties which can progress to myasthenic crisis needing ventilatory support. Given the predominant ocular onset of the disease, it is important that ophthalmologists are aware of the differential diagnosis, investigations and management including evolving therapies. When the disease remains localised to the extraocular muscles (ocular MG) IgG1 and IgG3 antibodies against the AChR (including clustered AChR) are present in nearly 50% of patients. In generalised MG this is seen in nearly 90% patients. Other antibodies include those against muscle specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK) and lipoprotein receptor related protein 4 (LRP4). Even though decremental response on repetitive nerve stimulation is the most well recognised neurophysiological abnormality, single fibre electromyogram (SFEMG) in experienced hands is the most sensitive test which helps in the diagnosis. Initial treatment should be using cholinesterase inhibitors and then proceeding to immunosuppression using corticosteroids and steroid sparing drugs. Patients requiring bulbar muscle support may need rescue therapies including plasma exchange and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg). Newer therapeutic targets include those against the B lymphocytes, complement system, neonatal Fc receptors (FcRn) and various other elements of the immune system.
Subject(s)
Cholinesterase Inhibitors , Myasthenia Gravis , Humans , Myasthenia Gravis/diagnosis , Myasthenia Gravis/therapy , Myasthenia Gravis/physiopathology , Cholinesterase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Autoantibodies , Receptors, Cholinergic/immunology , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Plasma ExchangeABSTRACT
Myasthenia gravis (MG) and Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS) are autoimmune disorders affecting neuromuscular transmission. Their combined occurrence is rare, and treatment remains challenging. Two women diagnosed with concomitant MG/LEMS experienced severe, increasing disease activity despite multiple immunotherapies. Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells have shown promise for treating autoimmune diseases. This report details the safe application of anti-CD19 CAR T cells for treating concomitant MG/LEMS. After CAR T cell therapy, both patients experienced rapid clinical recovery and regained full mobility. Deep B cell depletion and normalization of acetylcholine receptor and voltage-gated calcium channel N-type autoantibody levels paralleled major neurological responses. Within 2 months, both patients returned to everyday life, from wheelchair dependency to bicycling and mountain hiking, and remain stable at 6 and 4 months post-CAR T cell infusion, respectively. This report highlights the potential for anti-CD19 CAR T cells to achieve profound clinical effects in the treatment of neuroimmunological diseases.
Subject(s)
Antigens, CD19 , Immunotherapy, Adoptive , Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome , Myasthenia Gravis , Humans , Female , Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome/immunology , Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome/therapy , Myasthenia Gravis/immunology , Myasthenia Gravis/therapy , Antigens, CD19/immunology , Immunotherapy, Adoptive/methods , Middle Aged , T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Receptors, Chimeric Antigen/immunology , Adult , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a common autoimmune disease that often involves the skeletal muscle of the whole body and seriously affects patients' quality of life. Acupuncture and moxibustion treatment of MG has unique advantages, the aim is to evaluate the clinical effect of acupuncture and moxibustion on MG. METHODS: The literature on acupuncture and moxibustion treating MG in PubMed, CochraneLibrary, EMBASE, SCI, China Academic Journals full-text database, China Biology Medicine disc, VIP and Wanfang database were searched through computers from the establishment of the database to December 2022. RESULTS: A total of 11 studies were included, involving 658 patients, where 330 in the treatment group and 328 in the control group. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the treatment group performed better than the control group in improving the total clinical response rate (ORâ =â 3.26, 95%[2.04,5.21], Pâ <â .01). Additionally, the treatment group outperformed the control group in raising the absolute clinical score (MDâ =â -3.48, 95%CI[-5.17, -1.78], Pâ <â .01). However, there was no significant difference between the treatment group and the control group in improving the level of serum interleukin-6 receptor (MDâ =â -1.45,95%CI[-6.85,3.95], Pâ >â .05) and OMG quantitative score (MDâ =â -2.16,95%CI[-4.85,0.52], Pâ >â .05). The total clinical effective rate was tested for publication bias, which showed that the 2 sides of the funnel plot were asymmetrical, suggesting the possible existence of publication bias. CONCLUSION: Acupuncture and moxibustion has a good effect on MG, which is better than conventional Western medicine in improving the total clinical effective rate and absolute clinical score.
Subject(s)
Acupuncture Therapy , Moxibustion , Myasthenia Gravis , Moxibustion/methods , Humans , Myasthenia Gravis/therapy , Acupuncture Therapy/methods , Treatment Outcome , Quality of LifeABSTRACT
Herein, we describe the mechanisms, diagnostic procedures, and treatment options for acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibody-positive myasthenia gravis (MG). The upstream pathomechanism of this condition involves AChR-sensitized T cell-dependent B cell proliferation and the subsequent production of pathogenic autoantibodies. Downstream molecules include AChR antibodies that activate complement pathways, resulting in the destruction of motor endplates. We further introduce newly-developed molecular targeted drugs for the treatment of MG that aims to secure patients' health-related quality of life.
Subject(s)
Autoantibodies , Myasthenia Gravis , Receptors, Cholinergic , Myasthenia Gravis/immunology , Myasthenia Gravis/diagnosis , Myasthenia Gravis/therapy , Humans , Receptors, Cholinergic/immunology , Autoantibodies/immunologyABSTRACT
Reportedly, patients with muscle-specific kinase (MuSK) antibody-positive myasthenia gravis (MG) account for approximately 3.0% of all patients with MG in Japan. Compared with patients who have acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive MG, those with MuSK antibody-positive MG show young-onset disease with female predominance, a low rate of ocular involvement (5.9%), and greater severity of dysphagia. The aforementioned types of MG are indistinguishable based on clinical symptoms and electrophysiological tests, and measurement of MuSK antibodies is essential for diagnosis. Thymectomy and complement inhibitors are not indicated for treatment, and acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, steroids, immunosuppressants, plasma exchange, intravenous immunoglobulin therapy, and neonatal Fc receptor inhibitors are used.
Subject(s)
Autoantibodies , Myasthenia Gravis , Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases , Receptors, Cholinergic , Humans , Myasthenia Gravis/immunology , Myasthenia Gravis/diagnosis , Myasthenia Gravis/therapy , Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases/immunology , Receptors, Cholinergic/immunology , Autoantibodies/immunologyABSTRACT
When progressive and severe, myasthenia gravis and Guillain-Barré syndrome may have the potential for fatal and unfavorable clinical outcomes. Regardless of important differences in their clinical course, the development of weakness of oropharyngeal muscles and respiratory failure with requirement of mechanical ventilation is the main driver of poor prognosis in both conditions. The need for prolonged mechanical ventilation is particularly relevant because it immobilizes the patient and care becomes extraordinarily complex due to daily risks of systemic complications. Additionally, patients with myasthenia gravis often require long-term immunosuppressive treatments with associated toxicity and infectious risks. Unlike myasthenia gravis, the recovery period is prolonged in Guillain-Barré syndrome, but often favorable, even in the more severely affected patients. Outcome, for a large part, is determined by expert neurocritical care.
Subject(s)
Guillain-Barre Syndrome , Myasthenia Gravis , Humans , Myasthenia Gravis/therapy , Myasthenia Gravis/diagnosis , Myasthenia Gravis/complications , Guillain-Barre Syndrome/therapy , Guillain-Barre Syndrome/diagnosis , Respiration, Artificial , Treatment OutcomeSubject(s)
Antigens, CD19 , Myasthenia Gravis , Receptors, Cholinergic , Humans , Myasthenia Gravis/immunology , Myasthenia Gravis/therapy , Myasthenia Gravis/drug therapy , Receptors, Cholinergic/immunology , Antigens, CD19/immunology , B-Cell Maturation Antigen/immunology , Immunotherapy, Adoptive/methods , Female , Autoantibodies/blood , Male , Middle Aged , AdultABSTRACT
International guidelines on the treatment of myasthenia gravis (MG) have been published but are not tailored to the Belgian situation. This publication presents recommendations from a group of Belgian MG experts for the practical management of MG in Belgium. It includes recommendations for treatment of adult patients with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) or ocular myasthenia gravis (oMG). Depending on the MG-related antibody a treatment sequence is suggested with therapies that can be added on if the treatment goal is not achieved. Selection of treatments was based on the level of evidence of efficacy, registration and reimbursement status in Belgium, common daily practice and the personal views and experiences of the authors. The paper reflects the situation in February 2024. In addition to the treatment considerations, other relevant aspects in the management of MG are addressed, including comorbidities, drugs aggravating disease symptoms, pregnancy, and vaccination. As many new treatments might potentially come to market, a realistic future perspective on the impact of these treatments on clinical practice is given. In conclusion, these recommendations intend to be a guide for neurologists treating patients with MG in Belgium.
Subject(s)
Myasthenia Gravis , Myasthenia Gravis/therapy , Myasthenia Gravis/diagnosis , Humans , Belgium , Disease Management , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standardsABSTRACT
Myasthenia gravis - still a challenge for sufferers and doctors in 2023. But which therapy is best suited? Our clinically experienced experts have summarized the current guidelines for diagnosis and treatment in order to provide optimal support for those affected. Find out how you can carry out a quick and targeted diagnosis and which treatment options are available to alleviate the course of the disease.
Subject(s)
Myasthenia Gravis , Humans , Myasthenia Gravis/diagnosis , Myasthenia Gravis/therapyABSTRACT
Myasthenia gravis (MG) stands as a perplexing autoimmune disorder affecting the neuromuscular junction, driven by a multitude of antibodies targeting postsynaptic elements. However, the mystery of MG pathogenesis has yet to be completely uncovered, and its heterogeneity also challenges diagnosis and treatment. Growing evidence shows the differential expression of non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) in MG has played an essential role in the development of MG in recent years. Remarkably, these aberrantly expressed ncRNAs exhibit distinct profiles within diverse clinical subgroups and among patients harboring various antibody types. Furthermore, they have been implicated in orchestrating the production of inflammatory cytokines, perturbing the equilibrium of T helper 1 cells (Th1), T helper 17 cells (Th17), and regulatory T cells (Tregs), and inciting B cells to generate antibodies. Studies have elucidated that certain ncRNAs mirror the clinical severity of MG, while others may hold therapeutic significance, showcasing a propensity to return to normal levels following appropriate treatments or potentially foretelling the responsiveness to immunosuppressive therapies. Notably, the intricate interplay among these ncRNAs does not follow a linear trajectory but rather assembles into a complex network, with competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) emerging as a prominent hub in some cases. This comprehensive review consolidates the landscape of dysregulated ncRNAs in MG, briefly delineating their pivotal role in MG pathogenesis. Furthermore, it explores their promise as prospective biomarkers, aiding in the elucidation of disease subtypes, assessment of disease severity, monitoring therapeutic responses, and as novel therapeutic targets.
Subject(s)
Myasthenia Gravis , Humans , Myasthenia Gravis/therapy , Myasthenia Gravis/drug therapy , Th1 Cells , T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory , Neuromuscular Junction/pathology , Th17 Cells/pathologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Juvenile myasthenia gravis (JMG) is a rare autoimmune disease that causes fatigable muscle weakness in children aged <18 years. There is currently no curative treatment or internationally accepted standard of care for JMG. The objective is to investigate relationships between clinical presentation, antibody status, severity of disease onset, electrodiagnostic evaluation, and response to therapy in JMG. METHODS: This study was a retrospective chart review. Congenital myasthenic syndromes were excluded. Data on demographics, treatments, and outcomes were collected. Disease severity was evaluated using Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) clinical classifications. RESULTS: We identified 84 patients with JMG at Children's Medical Center Dallas between January 2014 and February 2022. It was found that 52% of patients presented with ocular JMG (median onset age 4.5 years) and 48% with generalized JMG (median onset age 11.5 years); 81% tested positive for acetylcholine receptor antibodies. Patients were 17% non-Hispanic white, 29% Hispanic, 39% black, and 12% Asian. There was a significant difference in average MGFA scores between ethnicities (P = 0.047) and age groups (P = 0.004), with postpubertal patients having higher average MGFA scores than prepubertal patients. Seventy-one percent of patients who underwent thymectomy experienced a decrease in MGFA scores postprocedure. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that there were significant differences in disease severity between ethnicities and age groups and that most patients who underwent thymectomy showed clinical improvement. These outcomes highlight the need for additional therapies in the treatment of JMG and the importance of extending clinical trials to the pediatric population.
Subject(s)
Myasthenia Gravis , Humans , Myasthenia Gravis/therapy , Myasthenia Gravis/diagnosis , Myasthenia Gravis/physiopathology , Child , Male , Female , Retrospective Studies , Texas , Adolescent , Child, Preschool , Treatment Outcome , Thymectomy , Severity of Illness Index , Age of OnsetABSTRACT
Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease characterized by fluctuating weakness of skeletal muscles. Despite current treatments, a significant percentage of patients remain symptomatic. This review explores new immunosuppressive therapies and ongoing clinical trials in MG, including depletion of B lymphocytes with agents such as rituximab and inebilizumab, as well as the use of eculizumab, efgartigimod, satralizumab, tocilizumab, and CAR-T (Chimeric Antigen Receptor-T) cell therapy. These advancements aim to improve disease control and patients' quality of life.
La myasthénie grave (MG) est une maladie auto-immune caractérisée par une faiblesse fluctuante des muscles squelettiques. Malgré les traitements classiques, un pourcentage significatif de patients reste symptomatique. Cet article explore les nouvelles thérapies immunosuppressives et les essais cliniques en cours pour la MG, notamment la déplétion des lymphocytes B avec des agents tels que le rituximab et l'inébilizumab, ainsi que l'utilisation de l'éculizumab, de l'efgartigimod, du satralizumab, du tocilizumab et de la thérapie par cellules CAR-T (Chimeric Antigen Receptor-T). Ces avancées visent à améliorer le contrôle de la maladie et la qualité de vie des patients.