Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 21
Filter
1.
Neurology ; 103(9): e209925, 2024 Nov 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39393030

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Although neurodegenerative diseases are a leading cause of death, little is known about health care utilization and cost during the end-of-life (EoL) period or how it compares with that of other life-limiting conditions. We aimed to describe and compare resource utilization among US Medicare decedents with neurodegenerative diseases with decedents with cancer. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of Medicare Part A and B beneficiaries with Alzheimer disease (AD), Parkinson disease (PD), or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) who died in 2018. Decedents diagnosed with malignant brain tumors or pancreatic cancer served as non-neurodegenerative comparators. Descriptive analyses examined demographic and clinical characteristics in the last year of life. The probabilities and associated costs of emergency department (ED), inpatient, skilled nursing facility (SNF), and hospice utilization during the last 12 and 6 months of life were also compared between persons with neurodegenerative diseases and cancer, adjusting for sociodemographic factors and comorbidity burden. RESULTS: A total of 1,126,799 Medicare beneficiaries died in 2018, of which 357,926 had a qualifying diagnosis. Persons with neurodegenerative diseases were older and more frequently received Medicaid assistance than persons with brain or pancreatic cancer. In all groups, health care service utilization increased over the last year of life, and total costs were predominantly attributable to inpatient care. In the last 6 months of life, neurologist care was infrequent among patients with neurodegenerative disease (AD: 1.5%; PD: 8.6%; ALS: 32.0%). Persons with neurodegenerative diseases as compared to persons with malignant brain tumors also had greater odds of ED use (AD: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.17, 95% CI 1.11-1.23; PD: aOR 1.18, 95% CI 1.11-1.25; ALS: aOR 1.11, 95% CI 1.01-1.23), lower odds of hospitalization (AD: aOR 0.64, 95% CI 0.60-0.68; PD: aOR 0.65, 95% CI 0.61-0.69; ALS: aOR 0.33, 95% CI 0.30-0.37), and lower odds of hospice enrollment (AD: aOR 0.33, 95% CI 0.31-0.36; PD: aOR 0.33, 95% CI 0.31-0.36; ALS: aOR 0.41, 95% CI 0.36-0.46). The findings were similar in pancreatic cancer. DISCUSSION: Persons with neurodegenerative diseases in the United States are more likely to visit the ED and less likely to use inpatient and hospice services at EoL than persons with brain or pancreatic cancer. These group differences may stem from prognostic uncertainty and reflect inadequate EoL care practices, requiring further investigation to ensure more timely palliative care and hospice referrals.


Subject(s)
Medicare , Neurodegenerative Diseases , Terminal Care , Humans , United States , Male , Female , Medicare/economics , Medicare/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Retrospective Studies , Terminal Care/economics , Terminal Care/statistics & numerical data , Aged, 80 and over , Neurodegenerative Diseases/economics , Neurodegenerative Diseases/therapy , Neurodegenerative Diseases/epidemiology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Emergency Service, Hospital/economics , Parkinson Disease/economics , Parkinson Disease/therapy , Parkinson Disease/epidemiology , Hospice Care/economics , Hospice Care/statistics & numerical data , Alzheimer Disease/economics , Alzheimer Disease/therapy , Alzheimer Disease/epidemiology , Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/economics , Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/therapy , Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/epidemiology
2.
Clin Interv Aging ; 15: 1841-1862, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33061334

ABSTRACT

Nowadays, the population is rapidly ageing because of increasing life expectancy and decreasing birth rates. Thus, the purpose of this systematic review is to prepare a comprehensive overview which identifies the activities of daily living (ADLs) that are gradually reduced among patients with dementia, as well as explore the therapies applied in relation to dementia and how they effectively improve the quality of life (QoL) of patients and caregivers. Furthermore, we aim to summarise the ADL activities influenced by therapies and examine the treatment costs and care for patients so that recommendations for research and development (R&D) can be made to improve both the QoL of people with dementia and cost-saving measures. The research focuses on four selected neurodegenerative diseases: Alzheimer, Parkinson, vascular dementia, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Therefore, the peer-reviewed English written articles from 2014 to 2019 were searched between September 1 and December 13, 2019. Twenty-seven papers were included in the analysis. The results show that essential assistance occurs in connection with activities: eating, drinking, dressing, bathing, personal hygiene, use of the toilet, and transport. By contrast, shopping or cleaning is not addressed as much. A lower ability to take care of oneself is connected with poor patient health and higher social care costs because the patient requires care from external sources, such as home aid or nurse visits. The challenge that remains is to shift new knowledge from scientific disciplines and connect it with the needs of patients to remove legitimate barriers and increase the acceptance of new solutions by popularisation. Additionally, regarding the burden on caregivers, it would be appropriate to promote this area of education and employment so that family members can use formal caregivers, ensuring them free time and much-needed rest.


Subject(s)
Activities of Daily Living , Neurodegenerative Diseases/economics , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Health Care Costs , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Quality of Life
3.
Int J Clin Pract ; 74(9): e13534, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32418282

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: As the Chinese population continues to age, the incidence of neurodegenerative diseases (NDDs) has increased dramatically, which results in heavy medical and economic burden for families and society. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate NDDs in a southern Chinese hospital over a 10-year period and examine trends in demographics, outcome, length of stay (LOS) and cost. METHODS: Retrospective medical records of patients from January 2010 to December 2019 were collected, including 7231 patients with NDDs (as case group) and 9663 patients without any NDDs (as control group). The information of social demographic data, admission source, reasons for admission, outcomes, LOS, and cost were extracted and analysed. RESULT: The average hospitalisation age of the patients with NDDs is over 65 years (peak age 70-89 years). Compared with the control group, the case group had a longer LOS and a higher cost and the numbers of patients with NDDs increased yearly from 2010 to 2019. The LOS shortened while the cost increased. Clinical features affected LOS and cost. Patients suffering from infection, abnormal blood pressure and the imbalance of water-electrolyte homoeostasis as main reasons for admission were decreased; however, heart disease, cerebrovascular accident and mental diseases were significantly increased, the overall change trend of fracture/trauma remained stable. The rate of discharge to home care and mortality declined; discharge to other medical or community facilities increased over 10 years. CONCLUSION: The majority of NDDs patients tended to be older. During the last 10 years from 2010 to 2019, the numbers of NDDs patients increased yearly, the trend of LOS became shortening and the cost gradually increasing. The main reasons of admission and outcomes of hospital showed different trends.


Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Neurodegenerative Diseases/epidemiology , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , China , Female , Health Status , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Neurodegenerative Diseases/economics , Neurodegenerative Diseases/parasitology , Patient Discharge/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Stroke/epidemiology , Time Factors
6.
Neurology ; 89(20): 2049-2056, 2017 Nov 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28978658

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the socioeconomic burden of frontotemporal degeneration (FTD) compared to previously published data for Alzheimer disease (AD). METHODS: A 250-item internet survey was administered to primary caregivers of patients with behavioral-variant FTD (bvFTD), primary progressive aphasia, FTD with motor neuron disease, corticobasal syndrome, or progressive supranuclear palsy. The survey included validated scales for disease staging, behavior, activities of daily living, caregiver burden, and health economics, as well as investigator-designed questions to capture patient and caregiver experience with FTD. RESULTS: The entire survey was completed by 674 of 956 respondents (70.5%). Direct costs (2016 US dollars) equaled $47,916 and indirect costs $71,737, for a total annual per-patient cost of $119,654, nearly 2 times higher than reported costs for AD. Patients ≥65 years of age, with later stages of disease, and with bvFTD correlated with higher direct costs, while patients <65 years of age and men were associated with higher indirect costs. An FTD diagnosis produced a mean decrease in household income from $75,000 to $99,000 12 months before diagnosis to $50,000 to $59,999 12 months after diagnosis, resulting from lost days of work and early departure from the workforce. CONCLUSIONS: The economic burden of FTD is substantial. Counting productivity-related costs, per-patient costs for FTD appear to be greater than per-patient costs reported for AD. There is a need for biomarkers for accurate and timely diagnosis, effective treatments, and services to reduce this socioeconomic burden.


Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Frontotemporal Dementia/economics , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Neurodegenerative Diseases/economics , Age Factors , Aged , Aphasia, Primary Progressive/economics , Aphasia, Primary Progressive/nursing , Caregivers , Female , Frontotemporal Dementia/nursing , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Motor Neuron Disease/economics , Motor Neuron Disease/nursing , Neurodegenerative Diseases/nursing , Severity of Illness Index , Sex Factors , Supranuclear Palsy, Progressive/economics , Supranuclear Palsy, Progressive/nursing
7.
Neurology ; 88(24): 2321-2329, 2017 Jun 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28515268

ABSTRACT

Population-based disease registers identify and characterize all cases of disease, including those that might otherwise be neglected. Prospective population-based registers in neurodegeneration are necessary to provide comprehensive data on the whole phenotypic spectrum and can guide planning of health services. With the exception of the rare disease amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, few complete population-based registers exist for neurodegenerative conditions. Incomplete ascertainment, limitations and uncertainty in diagnostic categorization, and failure to recognize sources of bias reduce the accuracy and usefulness of many registers. Common biases include population stratification, the use of prevalent rather than incident cases in earlier years, changes in disease understanding and diagnostic criteria, and changing demographics over time. Future registers are at risk of funding shortfalls and changes to privacy legislation. Notwithstanding, as heterogeneities of clinical phenotype and disease pathogenesis are increasingly recognized in the neurodegenerations, well-designed longitudinal population-based disease registers will be an essential requirement to complete clinical understanding of neurodegenerative diseases.


Subject(s)
Neurodegenerative Diseases/epidemiology , Registries , Humans , Neurodegenerative Diseases/economics , Neurodegenerative Diseases/therapy
12.
Neuroepidemiology ; 42(1): 7-15, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24356059

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The majority of people with epilepsy (PWE) live in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, they remain largely untreated and the bulk of resources are used to treat patients in the developed world. This disparity constitutes a challenge for neuroepidemiological studies on a global scale. In the past, several studies have focused on diverse populations in disparate countries at various periods of time and for particular purposes. The specificity of different contexts and circumstances makes it difficult to analyse PWE as a group either qualitatively or quantitatively. Such methodological limitations are further complicated by a lack of logistical support. There is a lack of interest in conducting studies, which results in inadequate funding and, in addition, there is the considerable challenge of publishing research reports from LMICs in peer-reviewed international journals. METHODS: This paper focuses on methodological problems related to studies in LMICs and attempts to give the reasons for their limitations using epilepsy as an example. RESULTS: Regional conditions and environmental factors must be given careful consideration in the research design because of the importance of understanding the challenges of living in these environments. There are further limitations to the successful implementation of studies. Existing information on epilepsy is often not readily accessible; there is a lack of census data, and migratory patterns into cities make enumeration and sampling even more challenging. As there is usually no well-developed healthcare system a door-to-door screening process is often the only way to identify those with convulsive epilepsy. The questionnaire and study design should preferably be adapted from standardized protocols, and pre-tested and validated in local conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies in LMICs can provide data on the burden, risk factors, treatment and outcome of epilepsy only if the primary studies used are properly conducted using uniform and comparable methodology. The use of consistent replicable neuroepidemiological methods in primary studies and systematic reviews enable reduction of the treatment gap and better epilepsy care.


Subject(s)
Data Collection/economics , Data Collection/methods , Developing Countries/economics , Epidemiologic Research Design , Neurodegenerative Diseases/epidemiology , Poverty/economics , Humans , Neurodegenerative Diseases/economics , Socioeconomic Factors
13.
Neurology ; 80(21): 1989-96, 2013 May 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23616157

ABSTRACT

As the U.S. population ages, the burden of neurodegenerative disorders, including Alzheimer disease and Parkinson disease, will increase substantially. However, many of these patients and their families currently do not receive neurologic care. For example, a recent study found that over 40% of Medicare beneficiaries with an incident Parkinson disease diagnosis did not receive neurologist care early after diagnosis and those who did not were more likely to fracture a hip, be placed in a nursing home, and die. While geography, age, race, and sex likely contribute to these observed disparities in care and outcomes, a large barrier may be Medicare's reimbursement policies, which value procedures over care. With further reductions in Medicare reimbursement constantly on the horizon, the devaluing of clinical care will likely continue. Rather than guaranteeing access to care, Medicare's reimbursement policies may increasingly be an impediment to care.


Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Health Services Needs and Demand/trends , Medicare/trends , Neurodegenerative Diseases/epidemiology , Neurodegenerative Diseases/therapy , Patient Care/trends , Health Services Needs and Demand/economics , Humans , Medicare/economics , Neurodegenerative Diseases/economics , Patient Care/economics , Reimbursement Mechanisms/economics , Reimbursement Mechanisms/trends , United States/epidemiology
14.
Gesundheitswesen ; 75(3): 127-33, 2013 Mar.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23456959

ABSTRACT

A prospective calculation of disease-related social and economic costs due to night-time aircraft noise in the vicinity of Frankfurt/Main airport was performed for the calendar years 2012-2021. It was based on risk estimates for a variety of diagnostic entities (cardiovascular disease, depression, psychosis, diabetes mellitus, dementia and Alzheimer's disease, all cancers except malignancies of the respiratory system) from a previous case-control study on more than 1 million persons enrolled in compulsory sickness funds in the vicinity of the Cologne-Bonn airport, on disease-related cost estimates performed by the German Federal Statistical Office for the calender years 2002-2008, and calculations of the population exposed to night-time aircraft noise in the vicinity of Frankfurt/Main airport (2005 aircraft routes and flight frequencies). Total estimated costs came to more than 1.5 billion € with an excess of 23 400 cases of diseases treated in hospitals and of 3 400 subsequent deaths.


Subject(s)
Airports/economics , Diabetes Mellitus/economics , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Mental Disorders/economics , Neurodegenerative Diseases/economics , Noise , Sick Leave/economics , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aircraft/economics , Aircraft/statistics & numerical data , Airports/statistics & numerical data , Child , Child, Preschool , Comorbidity , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Environment , Female , Germany/epidemiology , Hospitalization/economics , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Models, Economic , Neoplasms , Neurodegenerative Diseases/epidemiology , Risk Assessment , Sick Leave/statistics & numerical data , Survival Analysis , Survival Rate , Young Adult
15.
Gac Sanit ; 27(5): 406-10, 2013.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23333030

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To apply the activity based costing (ABC) model to calculate the cost of therapy for neurodegenerative disorders in order to improve hospital management and allocate resources more efficiently. METHOD: We used the case study method in the Francolí long-term care day center. We applied all phases of an ABC system to quantify the cost of the activities developed in the center. We identified 60 activities; the information was collected in June 2009. RESULTS: The ABC system allowed us to calculate the average cost per patient with respect to the therapies received. The most costly and commonly applied technique was psycho-stimulation therapy. Focusing on this therapy and on others related to the admissions process could lead to significant cost savings. CONCLUSIONS: ABC costing is a viable method for costing activities and therapies in long-term day care centers because it can be adapted to their structure and standard practice. This type of costing allows the costs of each activity and therapy, or combination of therapies, to be determined and aids measures to improve management.


Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Neurodegenerative Diseases/economics , Neurodegenerative Diseases/therapy , Costs and Cost Analysis , Hospital Administration , Humans
17.
Ann Ist Super Sanita ; 47(1): 49-54, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21430339

ABSTRACT

Neurodegenerative diseases are disabling conditions continuously increasing due to aging of population. A disease modifying therapy that slows or stops disease progression is therefore a major unmet medical need. Unfortunately, research for effective treatments is hampered by lack of knowledge on the pathologic processes underpinning these diseases and of reliable biomarkers. Clinical trials are difficult, as they require large populations that need to be followed for very long periods to capture possible effects on disease progression. These difficulties produce frequent failures and waste of human and economic resources. Since research has to continue in this area, until comprehensive knowledge of basic pathologic processes is obtained, alternative study designs can be considered to identify disease modifiers and to reduce costs of clinical studies.


Subject(s)
Clinical Trials as Topic/trends , Neurodegenerative Diseases/drug therapy , Clinical Trials as Topic/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Humans , Neurodegenerative Diseases/economics , Research Design , Treatment Outcome
18.
Expert Opin Emerg Drugs ; 14(4): 577-89, 2009 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19772371

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Advances in health sciences during the last century have increased the average age in industrialized nations. Despite this progress, neurodegenerative diseases that affect higher order thinking and memory continue to increase in prevalence as they take a devastating toll on human productivity in the later years. There is an acute need for new drugs and therapeutic approaches for treating these severe diseases, and also for improving the quality of cognitive function associated with normal aging and in many other disorders and syndromes that present with cognitive dysfunction. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this review is to ascertain the pharmacological approaches being exploited to improve cognition and memory and to determine the most relevant and effective directions taken for new drug discovery. Limitations and difficulties encountered in this effort also are discussed. METHODS: This review focuses primarily on compounds already undergoing clinical trials for improving cognition and memory with some discussion of rising new drug targets. RESULTS/CONCLUSION: Compounds that act on allosteric sites on neurotransmitter receptors are expected to lead the field with new levels of specificity and reduced side effects. New multi-functional compounds can be designed that can both improve cognition and slow the process of disease.


Subject(s)
Aging/physiology , Cognition/drug effects , Cost of Illness , Memory/drug effects , Neurons/drug effects , Nootropic Agents/pharmacology , Schizophrenic Psychology , Aging/drug effects , Animals , Antioxidants/therapeutic use , Cognition/physiology , Cognition Disorders/drug therapy , Cognition Disorders/economics , Disease Models, Animal , Drug Delivery Systems , Humans , Memory/physiology , Neurodegenerative Diseases/drug therapy , Neurodegenerative Diseases/economics , Neurons/physiology , Neuropsychological Tests , Nootropic Agents/therapeutic use , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
20.
Rinsho Shinkeigaku ; 43(11): 783-4, 2003 Nov.
Article in Japanese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15152463

ABSTRACT

Japan has been taking measures to cope with intractable diseases centering on five principles: "promoting investigation and research", "providing medical care facilities", "reducing co-payment for medical costs", "improving and coordinating community-based health care", "medical care and welfare services", and "promoting welfare measures aimed at improving the quality of life (QOL)". As the object of measures, 118 diseases including serious neurological diseases (e.g. ALS, CJD, PD etc.) have been specified. Thirty years have passed since the specific diseases treatment research program was launched, during which the environment surrounding intractable diseases has changed significantly. In light of this, "Committee on Measures Against Intractable Diseases" was organized in Sept 2001 under the Health Science Council. Based on the interim report of the committee, the government is going to take new measures against the intractable diseases.


Subject(s)
Health Care Reform , Neurodegenerative Diseases/rehabilitation , Delivery of Health Care , Health Care Reform/organization & administration , Insurance, Long-Term Care , Japan , Neurodegenerative Diseases/economics , Neurodegenerative Diseases/therapy , Quality of Life
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL