Potential efficacy of digital polymerase chain reaction for non-invasive prenatal screening of autosomal aneuploidies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction (dPCR) presents a promising approach for quantifying DNA and analyzing copy number variants, particularly in non-invasive prenatal testing. This method offers a streamlined and time-efficient procedure in contrast to the widely used next-generation sequencing for non-invasive prenatal testing. Studies have reported encouraging results for dPCR in detecting fetal autosomal aneuploidies. Consequently, this systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of dPCR in screening for trisomy 21, 18, and 13. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Sciences, and Embase for relevant articles published up to December 30, 2023. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) was utilized for the quality assessment of the included articles. Furthermore, a bivariate random-effect regression model was used to conduct a meta-analysis on the utility of dPCR for trisomy 21 screening. RESULTS: A total of 9 articles were included in this review, with all of them assessing the utility of dPCR in trisomy 21 screening, and 2 and 1 studies conducting additional analysis on the screening abilities of dPCR for trisomy 18 and 13, respectively. A bivariate random-effects model calculated pooled sensitivity and specificity with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Meta-analysis of 6 studies comparing trisomy-21 screening with karyotyping demonstrated dPCR's pooled sensitivity of 98% [95% CI: 94 -100] and specificity of 99% [95% CI: 99 -100]. While conducting a meta-analysis for trisomy 13 and 18 proved impractical, reported values for sensitivity and specificity were favorable. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that dPCR holds promise as an effective tool for non-invasive prenatal testing, presenting a less time-consuming and intricate alternative to next-generation sequencing. However, further research is necessary to evaluate dPCR's applicability in clinical settings and to delineate its specific advantages over next-generation sequencing. This study contributes valuable insights into the potential of dPCR for enhancing prenatal screening methodologies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The protocol of this study was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on 7/3/2024, with a registration code of CRD42024517523.

[Comparison of two superparamagnetic purification magnetic beads-based screening and enrichment techniques for isolating cell-free fetal DNA from maternal plasma for non-invasive prenatal screening].

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficiency of modified enrichment method for cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) through purified superparamagnetic beads during non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT). METHODS: A total of 26 252 pregnant women undergoing NIPT at the Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital of Haidian District from December 2017 to September 2022 were recruited and randomly assigned into the conventional group (n = 10 573) and the modified enrichment group (n = 15 679), who were then subjected to the screening and enrichment of the cffDNA using a conventional and a modified technique, respectively. High-risk pregnant women detected by NIPT were subjected to invasive prenatal diagnosis. All women were followed up for their pregnancy outcomes, and the detection efficacy of the two methods was compared in terms of fragment size, concentration of cffDNA, duplicate detection rate, and indices of clinical laboratory tests. RESULTS: The fragment size of the main peak of the cell-free DNA library of the modified enrichment group was significantly lower than that of the conventional group [267 (264, 269) bp vs. 294 (292, 296) bp, P < 0.01], while the concentration of cffDNA was significantly higher [21.86% (17.61%, 26.36%) vs. 9.08% (6.87%, 11.87%), P < 0.01]. In addition, the duplicate detection rate (0.740% vs. 2.02%, X2 = 83.90, P < 0.01) and detection failure rate (0.006% vs. 0.057%, P < 0.05) in the modified enrichment group were significantly lower than those of the conventional group. The combined positive predictive value (PPV) in both high-risk (64.3% vs. 76.1%) and low-risk (35.3% vs. 45.5%) pregnant women from the modified enrichment group was slightly lower than those from the conventional group, though no significant difference was detected. There was one false negative case for trisomy 21 among the high-risk pregnant women from the conventional group, and no false negative case was found in the modified enrichment group. CONCLUSION: The modified technique to screen and enrich the cffDNA has significantly enhanced the relative concentration of cffDNA and reduced the failure and duplication detection rate of NIPT, which has significantly reduced the incidence of false negative cases due to the low concentration of cffDNA, and greatly increased the overall detection efficacy of NIPT.

Accuracy of expanded noninvasive prenatal testing for maternal copy number variations: A comparative study with CNV-seq of maternal lymphocyte DNA.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of expanded noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for maternal copy number variations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Expanded NIPT was used to detect CNVs ≥2 Mb at a whole-genome scale. The threshold of maternal deletion was copy numbers (CN) ≤ 1.6, and the threshold of maternal duplication was CN ≥ 2.4. RESULTS: Of the 5440 pregnant women with successful expanded NIPT results, 28 maternal CNVs ≥2 Mb were detected in 27 pregnant women. Except for five cases reported as test failure, 23 CNVs ≥2 Mb were confirmed among the remaining 22 pregnant women by CNV-seq of maternal lymphocyte DNA. The genomic location, copy numbers and fragment size of maternal CNVs reported by expanded NIPT were consistent with the results of CNV-seq of maternal lymphocyte DNA. CONCLUSIONS: Maternal CNVs ≥2 Mb can be accurately evaluated according to the CN indicated by expanded NIPT results.

Noninvasive Prenatal Test Results Indicative of Maternal Malignancies: A Nationwide Genetic and Clinical Follow-Up Study.

The author describes the results and implications of a study on noninvasive prenatal test results that indicate maternal malignancies.

NIPT-PG: empowering non-invasive prenatal testing to learn from population genomics through an incremental pan-genomic approach.

Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is a quite popular approach for detecting fetal genomic aneuploidies. However, due to the limitations on sequencing read length and coverage, NIPT suffers a bottleneck on further improving performance and conducting earlier detection. The errors mainly come from reference biases and population polymorphism. To break this bottleneck, we proposed NIPT-PG, which enables the NIPT algorithm to learn from population data. A pan-genome model is introduced to incorporate variant and polymorphic loci information from tested population. Subsequently, we proposed a sequence-to-graph alignment method, which considers the read mis-match rates during the mapping process, and an indexing method using hash indexing and adjacency lists to accelerate the read alignment process. Finally, by integrating multi-source aligned read and polymorphic sites across the pan-genome, NIPT-PG obtains a more accurate z-score, thereby improving the accuracy of chromosomal aneuploidy detection. We tested NIPT-PG on two simulated datasets and 745 real-world cell-free DNA sequencing data sets from pregnant women. Results demonstrate that NIPT-PG outperforms the standard z-score test. Furthermore, combining experimental and theoretical analyses, we demonstrate the probably approximately correct learnability of NIPT-PG. In summary, NIPT-PG provides a new perspective for fetal chromosomal aneuploidies detection. NIPT-PG may have broad applications in clinical testing, and its detection results can serve as a reference for false positive samples approaching the critical threshold.

Non-invasive prenatal testing of beta-hemoglobinopathies using next generation sequencing, in-silico sequence size selection, and haplotyping.

AIM: To develop a non-invasive prenatal test for beta-hemoglobinopathies based on analyzing maternal plasma by using next generation sequencing. METHODS: We applied next generation sequencing (NGS) of maternal plasma to the non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) of autosomal recessive diseases, sickle cell disease and beta-thalassemia. Using the Illumina MiSeq, we sequenced plasma libraries obtained via a Twist Bioscience probe capture panel covering 4 Kb of chromosome 11, including the beta-globin (HBB) gene and >450 genomic single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) used to estimate the fetal fraction (FF). The FF is estimated by counting paternally transmitted allelic sequence reads present in the plasma but absent in the mother. We inferred fetal beta-globin genotypes by comparing the observed mutation (Mut) and reference (Ref) read ratios to those expected for the three possible fetal genotypes (Mut/Mut; Mut/Ref; Ref/Ref), based on the FF. RESULTS: We bioinformatically enriched the FF by excluding reads over a specified length via in-silico size selection (ISS), favoring the shorter fetal reads, which increased fetal genotype prediction accuracy. Finally, we determined the parental HBB haplotypes, which allowed us to use the read ratios observed at linked SNPs to help predict the fetal genotype at the mutation site(s). We determined HBB haplotypes via Oxford Nanopore MinION sequencing of a 2.2 kb amplicon and aligned these sequences using Soft Genetics' NextGENe LR software. CONCLUSION: The combined use of ISS and HBB haplotypes enabled us to correctly predict fetal genotypes in cases where the prediction based on variant read ratios alone was incorrect.

Noninvasive prenatal screening in a pregnant woman with a history of stem cell transplant from a male donor: A case report and literature review.

BACKGROUND: As a screening method, inaccuracies in noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) exist, which are often attributable to biological factors. One such factor is the history of transplantation. However, there are still limited reports on such NIPS cases. METHODS: We report an NIPS case of a pregnant woman who had received a stem cell transplant from a male donor. To determine the karyotype in the woman's original cell, we performed chromosome microarray analysis (CMA) on her postnatal blood and oral mucosa. To comprehensively estimate the cell-free DNA (cfDNA) composition, we further performed standard NIPS procedures on the postnatal plasma. Moreover, we reviewed all published relevant NIPS case reports about pregnant women with transplantation history. RESULTS: NIPS showed a low-risk result for common trisomies with a fetal fraction of 65.80%. CMA on maternal white blood cells showed a nonmosaic male karyotype, while the oral mucosa showed a nonmosaic female karyotype. The proportion of donor's cfDNA in postnatal plasma was 94.73% based on the Y-chromosome reads ratio. The composition of cfDNA in maternal plasma was estimated as follows: prenatally, 13.60% maternal, 65.80% donor, and 20.60% fetal/placental, whereas postnatally, 5.27% maternal and 94.73% donor. CONCLUSIONS: This study expanded our understanding of the influence of stem cell transplantation on NIPS, allowing us to optimize NIPS management for these women.

Prenatal detection of chromosome 7q deletion with duplication: A case report and literature review.

RATIONALE: With advances in prenatal diagnostic techniques, chromosomal microdeletions and microduplications have become the focus of prenatal diagnosis. 7q partial monosomy or trisomy due to a deletion or duplication of the 7q end is relatively rare and usually originates from parents carrying a balanced translocation. PATIENT CONCERNS: Noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPT) showed a fetus with partial deletion and duplication of chromosome 7q. It was not possible to determine whether the fetus was normal. DIAGNOSES: Conventional chromosome G-banding and chromosome microarray analysis (CMA) were performed on fetal amniotic fluid samples and parental peripheral blood samples. INTERVENTIONS: The pregnant women were given detailed genetic counseling by clinicians. OUTCOMES: The fetal karyotype was 46, XY on conventional G-banding analysis. The CMA test results showed a deletion of approximately 7.8 Mb in the 7q36.1q36.3 region and a duplication of 6.6Mb in the 7q35q36.1 region. The parents' karyotype analysis and CMA results were normal, indicating a new mutation. LESSONS: CMA molecular diagnostic analysis can effectively detect chromosomal microdeletions or microduplications, clarify the relationship between fetal genotype and clinical phenotype, and provide a reference for prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal microdeletion-duplication syndrome.

Prenatal diagnosis of a trisomy 7 mosaic case: CMA, CNV-seq, karyotyping, interphase FISH, and MS-MLPA, which technique to choose?

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to perform a prenatal genetic diagnosis of a high-risk fetus with trisomy 7 identified by noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and to evaluate the efficacy of different genetic testing techniques for prenatal diagnosis of trisomy mosaicism. METHODS: For prenatal diagnosis of a pregnant woman with a high risk of trisomy 7 suggested by NIPT, karyotyping and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) were performed on an amniotic fluid sample. Low-depth whole-genome copy number variation sequencing (CNV-seq) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) were used to clarify the results further. In addition, methylation-specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MS-MLPA) was performed to analyze the possibility of uniparental disomy(UPD). RESULTS: Amniotic fluid karyotype analysis revealed a 46, XX result. Approximately 20% mosaic trisomy 7 was detected according to the CMA result. About 16% and 4% of mosaicism was detected by CNV-seq and FISH, respectively. MS-MLPA showed no methylation abnormalities. The fetal ultrasound did not show any detectable abnormalities except for mild intrauterine growth retardation seen at 39 weeks of gestation. After receiving genetic counseling, the expectant mother decided to continue the pregnancy, and follow-up within three months of delivery was normal. CONCLUSION: In high-risk NIPT diagnosis, a combination of cytogenetic and molecular genetic techniques proves fruitful in detecting low-level mosaicism. Furthermore, the exclusion of UPD on chromosome 7 remains crucial when NIPT indicates a positive prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 7.

NIPT for adult-onset conditions: Australian NIPT users' views.

Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has become widely available in recent years. While initially used to screen for trisomies 21, 18, and 13, the test has expanded to include a range of other conditions and will likely expand further. This paper addresses the ethical issues that arise from one particularly controversial potential use of NIPT: screening for adult-onset conditions (AOCs). We report data from our quantitative survey of Australian NIPT users' views on the ethical issues raised by NIPT for AOCs. The survey ascertained support for NIPT for several traits and conditions including AOCs. Participants were then asked about their level of concern around implications of screening for AOCs for the future child and parent(s). Descriptive and comparative data analyses were conducted. In total, 109 respondents were included in data analysis. The majority of respondents expressed support for NIPT screening for preventable (70.9%) and nonpreventable AOCs (80.8%). Most respondents indicated concern around potential harmful impacts associated with NIPT for AOCs, including the psychological impact on the future child and on the parent(s). Despite this, the majority of participants thought that continuation of a pregnancy known to be predisposed to an AOC is ethically acceptable. The implications of these data are critically discussed and used to inform the normative claim that prospective parents should be given access to NIPT for AOCs. The study contributes to a body of research debating the ethical acceptability and regulation of various applications of NIPT as screening panels expand.

[Feasibility of non-invasive prenatal testing for the detection of fetal chromosomal copy number variants].

OBJECTIVE: To explore the feasibility of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for detecting fetal chromosomal copy number variants (CNV). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was carried out on NIPT positive samples in Suzhou Municipal Hospital from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2021. The effect of NIPT on fetal CNV detection was assessed by comparison with the results of karyotype analysis and/or chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA). RESULTS: Among the 525 NIPT positive samples, 146 were CNV cases, of which 84 were further verified by karyotyping and/or CMA, 29 (34.5%) were true positive. Among them, 12 cases were pathogenic variants, 2 cases were likely pathogenic variants and 15 cases were variants of uncertain significance. CONCLUSION: NIPT could detect CNV with high accuracy, and to combine CNV detection and chromosomal aneuploidy detection has great significance to improve the prenatal and postnatal care.

The impact of confined placental mosaicism on prenatal cell-free DNA screening: Insights from a monocentric study of 99 cases.

INTRODUCTION: Confined placental mosaicism (CPM) is thought to be one of the main sources of false-positive prenatal cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening results, but extensive and systematic studies to prove this statement are limited. We evaluate the contribution of CPM to false-positive prenatal cfDNA screening results in the largest cohort published to date. METHOD: We systematically offered postnatal analysis on placenta and umbilical cord to women who had a negative amniocentesis following a positive prenatal cfDNA screening result. A standardized protocol was used in which (when available) biopsies were taken at five locations in the placenta and umbilical cord. RESULTS: We analyzed a series of 99 placentas. CPM could be confirmed in 32.3 % of cases (32/99). CPM was detected across all subtypes of chromosomal aberrations (common and rare autosomal trisomies, sex chromosome abnormalities, copy number variations and autosomal monosomies). A lower detection rate was present in umbilical cord biopsies in comparison with placental biopsies. When comparing different sections of the placenta, no clear difference could be observed with regard to the probability of CPM being present nor to the grade of mosaicism. DISCUSSION: We confirm an important role for CPM in explaining false-positive prenatal cfDNA screening results. Placental regional differences are common. Given its limited clinical relevance, we do however not advocate placental studies in a diagnostic setting.

Prenatal Genome-Wide Cell-Free DNA Screening: Three Years of Clinical Experience in a Hospital Prenatal Diagnostic Unit in Spain.

Genome-wide prenatal cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening can be used to screen for a wide range of fetal chromosomal anomalies in pregnant patients. In this study, we describe our clinical experience with a genome-wide cfDNA assay in screening for common trisomies, sex chromosomal aneuploidies (SCAs), rare autosomal aneuploidies (RAAs), and copy-number variations (CNVs) in about 6000 patients over a three-year period at our hospital's Prenatal Diagnostic Unit in Spain. Overall, 204 (3.3%) patients had a high-risk call, which included 76 trisomy 21, 21 trisomy 18, 7 trisomy 13, 29 SCAs, 31 RAAs, 31 CNVs, and 9 cases with multiple anomalies. The diagnostic outcomes were obtained for the high-risk cases when available, allowing for the calculation of positive predictive values (PPVs). Calculated PPVs were 95.9% for trisomy 21, 77.8% for trisomy 18, 66.7% for trisomy 13, 10.7% for RAAs, and 10.7% for CNVs. Pregnancy and birth outcomes were also collected for the majority of RAA and CNV cases. Adverse perinatal outcomes for some of these cases included preeclampsia, fetal growth restriction, preterm birth, reduced birth weight, and major congenital structural abnormalities. In conclusion, our study showed strong performance for genome-wide cfDNA screening in a large cohort of pregnancy patients in Spain.

Low-level mosaic trisomy 21 at amniocentesis and cordocentesis in the second trimester in a pregnancy associated with positive non-invasive prenatal testing for trisomy 21, perinatal progressive decrease of the trisomy 21 cell line and a favorable fetal outcome.

OBJECTIVE: We present low-level mosaic trisomy 21 at amniocentesis and cordocentesis in a pregnancy associated with a favorable fetal outcome. CASE REPORT: A 26-year-old, primigravid woman underwent amniocentesis at 17 weeks of gestation because of positive non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for trisomy 21 at 16 weeks of gestation. Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 47,XX,+21[3]/46,XX[17], and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) on uncultured amniocytes revealed rsa X(P095) × 2, (13, 18, 21) × 2. She underwent cordocentesis (cord blood sampling) at 21 weeks of gestation which revealed a karyotype of 47,XX,+21[2]/46,XX[48]. At 27 weeks of gestation, she was referred to our hospital for genetic counseling, and repeat amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 46,XX in 20/20 colonies. Quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes and parental bloods excluded uniparental disomy (UPD) 21. Array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes revealed arr (1-22,X) × 2, Y × 0 with no genomic imbalance. Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis on 104 uncultured amniocytes detected one cell (1/104 = 0.9%) with trisomy 21, while the rest cells were disomy 21, compared with 0% (0/100) in the normal control. The woman was encouraged to continue the pregnancy. The pregnancy was carried to 38 weeks of gestation, and a 2771-g female baby was delivered no phenotypic abnormality. aCGH analysis on the cord blood showed arr (1-22,X) × 2, Y × 0 with no genomic imbalance. The umbilical cord had a karyotype of 47,XX,+21[3]/46,XX[37]. The placenta had a karyotype of 46,XX. When follow-up at age 3½ months, the neonate was phenotypically normal and had normal development. The peripheral blood had a karyotype of 46,XX in 40/40 cells. Interphase FISH analysis on buccal mucosal cells detected normal disomy 21 cells in 100/100 cells. CONCLUSION: Low-level mosaic trisomy 21 at amniocentesis and cordocentesis in the second trimester can be associated with perinatal progressive decrease of the trisomy 21 cell line and a favorable fetal outcome.

Disparities in integrating non-invasive prenatal testing into antenatal healthcare in Australia: a survey of healthcare professionals.

BACKGROUND: Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has been clinically available in Australia on a user-pays basis since 2012. There are numerous providers, with available tests ranging from targeted NIPT (only trisomies 21, 18, and 13 +/- sex chromosome aneuploidy) to genome-wide NIPT. While NIPT is being implemented in the public health care systems of other countries, in Australia, the implementation of NIPT has proceeded without public funding. The aim of this study was to investigate how NIPT has been integrated into antenatal care across Australia and reveal the successes and challenges in its implementation in this context. METHODS: An anonymous online survey was conducted from September to October 2022. Invitations to participate were sent to healthcare professionals (HCPs) involved in the provision of NIPT in Australia through professional society mailing lists and networks. Participants were asked questions on their knowledge of NIPT, delivery of NIPT, and post-test management of results. RESULTS: A total of 475 HCPs responded, comprising 232 (48.8%) obstetricians, 167 (35.2%) general practitioners, 32 (6.7%) midwives, and 44 (9.3%) genetic specialists. NIPT was most commonly offered as a first-tier test, with most HCPs (n = 279; 60.3%) offering it to patients as a choice between NIPT and combined first-trimester screening. Fifty-three percent (n = 245) of respondents always offered patients a choice between NIPT for the common autosomal trisomies and expanded (including genome-wide) NIPT. This choice was understood as supporting patient autonomy and informed consent. Cost was seen as a major barrier to access to NIPT, for both targeted and expanded tests. Equitable access, increasing time demands on HCPs, and staying up to date with advances were frequently reported as major challenges in delivering NIPT. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate substantial variation in the clinical implementation of NIPT in Australia, including in the offers of expanded screening options. After a decade of clinical use, Australian clinicians still report ongoing challenges in the clinical and equitable provision of NIPT.

The implementation and impact of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for Down's syndrome into antenatal screening programmes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is a widely adopted maternal blood test that analyses foetal originating DNA to screen for foetal chromosomal conditions, including Down's syndrome (DS). The introduction of this test, which may have implications for important decisions made during pregnancy, requires continual monitoring and evaluation. This systematic review aims to assess the extent of NIPT introduction into national screening programmes for DS worldwide, its uptake, and impact on pregnancy outcomes. METHODS AND FINDINGS: The study protocol was published in PROSPERO (CRD42022306167). We systematically searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, and Embase for population-based studies, government guidelines, and Public Health documents from 2010 onwards. Results summarised the national policies for NIPT implementation into screening programmes geographically, along with population uptake. Meta-analyses estimated the pooled proportions of women choosing invasive prenatal diagnosis (IPD) following a high chance biochemical screening result, before and after NIPT was introduced. Additionally, we meta-analysed outcomes (termination of pregnancy and live births) amongst high chance pregnancies identified by NIPT. Results demonstrated NIPT implementation in at least 27 countries. Uptake of second line NIPT varied, from 20.4% to 93.2% (n = 6). Following NIPT implementation, the proportion of women choosing IPD after high chance biochemical screening decreased from 75% (95% CI 53%, 88%, n = 5) to 43% (95%CI 31%, 56%, n = 5), an absolute risk reduction of 38%. A pooled estimate of 69% (95% CI 52%, 82%, n = 7) of high chance pregnancies after NIPT resulted in termination, whilst 8% (95% CI 3%, 21%, n = 7) had live births of babies with DS. CONCLUSIONS: NIPT has rapidly gained global acceptance, but population uptake is influenced by healthcare structures, historical screening practices, and cultural factors. Our findings indicate a reduction in IPD tests following NIPT implementation, but limited pre-NIPT data hinder comprehensive impact assessment. Transparent, comparable data reporting is vital for monitoring NIPT's potential consequences.

Genetic counseling of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) trisomy 7-positive pregnancies.

Trisomy 7 is the most common observed type of rare autosomal trisomies (RATs) detected at expanded genome-wide non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT). Genetic counseling of NIPT trisomy 7-positive pregnancies remains to be not easy because the parents may worry about the likelihood of adverse pregnancy outcomes, fetal abnormality and the necessity of invasive procedures for confirmation of fetal mosaic trisomy 7 and uniparental disomy (UPD) 7. This review provides a comprehensive information on the update issues concerning genetic counseling of NIPT trisomy 7-positive pregnancies.