The epidemiology of odontoid fractures: a study from the Swedish fracture register.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study is to characterize the occurrence of odontoid fractures within a Swedish population. METHODS: Prospective data of adults diagnosed with an odontoid fracture between 2015 and 2021 were retrieved from the Swedish Fracture Register (SFR). Epidemiologic data including age, sex, injury mechanism, injury type, fracture type (Anderson and D'Alonzo classification), neurological status and treatment type were requested from the SFR. Data pertinent to osteoporosis was retrieved from the Swedish National Patient Register. RESULTS: A total of 1,154 odontoid fractures were identified, of which 30 were type I fractures, 583 type II fractures, and 541 type III fractures. The mean (Standard Deviation [SD]) age was 77.2 (13.8) years. The prevalence of osteoporosis and neurological deficits did not differ between the fracture types. The majority of patients were treated non-surgically (81%). Male sex and patient age 18-30 years were commonly associated with a high-injury mechanism, especially motor vehicle accidents. In the type II fracture group, significantly more patients had fallen from standing height or less than in the type III group (66% vs. 58%, p = 0.01) while in contrast, motor vehicle accidents were more common in the type III fracture group (12% vs. type II: 8%, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Based on the SFR, the typical odontoid fracture patient is older and suffers a type II fracture. Most injuries were caused by low-energy trauma although in younger patients and males, they were associated with motor vehicle accidents. Across the patient population, odontoid fractures were usually treated non-surgically.

Augmented Reality in Spine Surgery: A Case Study of Atlantoaxial Instrumentation in Os Odontoideum.

Despite advancement in surgical innovation, C1-C2 fixation remains challenging due to risks of screw malposition and vertebral artery (VA) injuries. Traditional image-based navigation, while useful, often demands that surgeons frequently shift their attention to external monitors, potentially causing distractions. In this article, we introduce a microscope-based augmented reality (AR) navigation system that projects both anatomical information and real-time navigation images directly onto the surgical field. In the present case report, we discuss a 37-year-old female who suffered from os odontoideum with C1-C2 subluxation. Employing AR-assisted navigation, the patient underwent the successful posterior instrumentation of C1-C2. The integrated AR system offers direct visualization, potentially minimizing surgical distractions. In our opinion, as AR technology advances, its adoption in surgical practices and education is anticipated to expand.

Posterolateral Paramass Approach to Lesions Located at the Anterior C1-2 Level: A Cadaver Study.

OBJECTIVE: A novel posteriolateral surgical approach is described that will provide safe access to intradural and extradural lesions located in the anterior part of the spinal cord (SC) at the C1-2 level and to the odontoid in single session. METHODS: A total of five cadavers and two dry C1 vertebrae were used in this study. The study involved obtaining computed tomography magnetic resonance imaging scans and magnetic resonance imaging of all cadaver groups before and after the procedures. Group 1: Control; Group 2: Unilateral C1 posterior arch was removed, the inferomedial part of C1 lateral mass was removed, and access the anterior and lateral aspects of the SC. Group 3: In addition, odontoid was removed, Group 4: In addition, unilateral C1- C2 screw was placed. Group 5: In addition, bilateral C1-C2 screw was placed. RESULTS: The median distance from the midpoint of C1 posterior tubercle to vertebral groove which was removed in groups is 21.4 ± 2.88 mm. The average width of C1 lateral mass was 13.4±2.4 mm. After the lateral mass was drilled, its width decreased to 10,2 mm.This area was sufficient to open a surgical corridor and reach the anterior of SC and odontoid. After the procedure, no instability was found in group 2 without instrumentation on computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging scans. CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to access the anterior C1-C2 via a posterolateral paramass approach by drilling 20%-30% of the lateral mass, providing an open pathway for easy intervention in C1-C2 intradural lesions. It is also possible to perform odontoid resection using this approach.

Posterior atlantoaxial fixation of osteoporotic odontoid fracture: biomechanical analysis of the Magerl versus harms techniques in a cadaver model.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Odontoid fractures are among the most common cervical spine fractures in the elderly and are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Clinical evidence suggests improved survival and quality of life after operative intervention compared to nonoperative treatment. PURPOSE: This study seeks to examine the stability of an osteoporotic Type II odontoid fracture following posterior atlantoaxial fixation with either the Magerl transarticular fixation technique or the Harms C1 lateral mass screws C2 pedicle screw rod fixation. STUDY DESIGN: Biomechanical cadaveric study. METHODS: Eighteen cadaveric specimens extending from the cephalus to C7 were used in this study. Reflective marker arrays were attached to C1 and C2 and a single marker on the dens to measure movement of each during loading with C2-C3 and occiput-C1 being allowed to move freely. A biomechanical testing protocol imparted moments in flexion-extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending while a motion capture system recorded the motions of C1, C2, and the dens. The spines were instrumented with either the Harms fixation (n=9) or Magerl fixation (n=9) techniques, and a simulated Type II odontoid fracture was created. Motions of each instrumented spine were recorded for all moments, and then again after the instrumentation was removed to model the injured, noninstrumented state. RESULTS: Both Harms and Magerl posterior C1-C2 fixation allowed for C1, C2, and the dens to move as a relative unit. Without fixation the dens motion was coupled with C1. No significant differences were found in X, Y, Z translation motion of the dens, C1 or C2 during neutral zone motions between the Magerl and Harms fixation techniques. There were no significant differences found in Euler angle motion between the two techniques in either flexion-extension, axial rotation, or lateral bending motion. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that both Harms and Magerl fixation can significantly reduce dens motion in Type II odontoid fractures in an osteoporotic cadaveric bone model. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Both Harms and Magerl posterior atlantoaxial fixation techniques allowed for C1, C2, and the dens to move as a relative unit following odontoid fracture, establishing more anatomic stability to the upper cervical spine.

Unilateral Biplanar Screw-Rod Fixation Technique for the Treatment of Odontoid Fractures in Patients with Atlantoaxial Bone or Vascular Abnormalities.

OBJETIVE: This study aims to introduce the unilateral biplanar screw-rod fixation (UBSF) technique (a hybrid fixation technique: 2 sets of atlantoaxial screws were placed on the same side), which serves as a salvage method for traditional posterior atlantoaxial fixation. To summarize the indications of this technique and to assess its safety, feasibility, and clinical effectiveness in the treatment of odontoid fractures. METHODS: Patients with odontoid fractures were enrolled according to special criteria. Surgical duration and intraoperative blood loss were documented. Patients were followed up for a minimum of 12 months. X-ray and computerized tomography scans were conducted and reviewed at 1 day, and patients were asked to return for computerized tomography reviews at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after surgery until fracture union. Recorded and compared the Neck Visual Analog Scale and Neck Disability Index presurgery and at 1 week and 12 months postsurgery. RESULTS: Between January 2016 and December 2022, our study enrolled 7 patients who were diagnosed with odontoid fractures accompanied by atlantoaxial bone or vascular abnormalities. All 7 patients underwent successful UBSF surgery, and no neurovascular injuries were recorded during surgery. Fracture union was observed in all patients, and the Neck Visual Analog Scale and Neck Disability Index scores improved significantly at 1 week and 12 months postoperative (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The UBSF technique has been demonstrated to be safe, feasible, and effective in treating odontoid fractures. In cases where the atlantoaxial bone or vascular structure exhibits abnormalities, it can function as a supplementary or alternative approach to the conventional posterior C1-2 fixation.

Evaluation of Craniometric Parameters and Efficacy of Posterior Surgical Intervention Types in Basilar Invagination Patients.

OBJECTIVE: Basilar invagination is one of the most frequently observed abnormalities at the craniovertebral junction, in which the odontoid process of C2 prolapses into the foramen magnum. METHODS: The current study included 27 patients who underwent surgery for basilar invagination between October 2013 and January 2023. The study group was divided into 2 groups according to basilar invagination types; type I (the presence of type A atlantoaxial instability and instability is the main pathology) and type II (the presence of type B and C atlantoaxial instability and skull base dysgenesis is the main pathology). Craniometric parameters included in the study were atlantodental interval, posterior atlantodental interval, Chamberlain's line violation, clivus-canal angle, Welcher's basal angle, and Boogaard angle. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 24.30 ± 14.36 years (5-57 years). Fourteen patients (51.9%) were female, and 13 patients (48.1%) were male. Ten patients (37%) had type I basilar invagination, and 17 patients (63%) had type II basilar invagination. Preoperative and postoperative atlantodental interval and Boogaard angle were significantly higher in type I basilar invagination, as preoperative and postoperative posterior atlantodental interval and clivus-canal angle were significantly higher in type II basilar invagination. There was a positive strong correlation between Chamberlain's line violation and Boogaard angle. Postoperative Chamberlain's line violation was significantly higher in occipitocervical fixation (P = 0.035). C1 lateral mass screw fixation was found more successful in Chamberlain's line violation correction than occipital plates. Occipitocervical fixation was found to be associated with higher postoperative Nurick scores (P = 0.015) and complication rates (P = 0.020). Cages applied to the C1-C2 joint space were found to be associated with higher fusion rates (P = 0.023) and lower complication rates (P = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, it was found that C1-C2 fixation was more successful in correcting craniometric parameters and had lower complication rates than occipitocervical fixation. In appropriate patients, it was determined that cage application increased the success rates of the operations.

Dysphagia as a primary manifestation of basilar impression: A case report.

Secondary basilar invagination or basilar impression is an anomaly at the craniovertebral junction where the odontoid process prolapses into the foramen magnum with the risk of compressing adjacent structures and obstructing the proper flow of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). The incidence is less than 1% in the general population and occurs mainly in the first three decades of life when it is associated with malformations of the neuroaxis. In older age, the main aetiologies are diseases that alter bone mineral density. The clinical course is usually progressive and the most common symptoms are asthenia, cervical pain and restricted movement, but also dysphonia, dyspnoea and dysphagia. It is a progressive disease which, if left untreated, can cause severe neurological damage and death. We report the case of a 79-year-old woman with osteoporosis and progressive dysphagia leading to severe malnutrition, which conditioned the decision not to intervene due to the high perioperative risk.

Fatal cervical myelopathy in a child with glutaric aciduria type 1.

We report the case of a Syrian female refugee with late diagnosis of glutaric aciduria type 1 characterised by massive axial hypotonia and quadriplegia who only started adequate diet upon arrival in Switzerland at the age of 4 years, after a strenuous migration journey. Soon after arrival, she died from an unexpected severe upper cervical myelopathy, heralded by acute respiratory distress after a viral infection. This was likely due to repeated strains on her hypotonic neck and precipitated by an orthotopic os odontoideum who led to atlanto-axial subluxation. This case reminds us not to omit handling patients with insufficient postural control and hypotonia with great care to avoid progressive cervical myelopathy.

Dens Growth After Surgical Fixation in Children with Morquio-Brailsford Disease.

Mucopolysaccharidosis type IVA is a lysosomal storage disorder caused by a deficiency of the enzyme N-acetyl-galactosamine-6-sulphate sulphatase. Mucopolysaccharidosis type IVA is multisystemic disease with significant spinal involvement and atlantoaxial instability leading to neural compression and significant morbidity. Dens hypoplasia is a common feature of this condition. In this study we demonstrate that after spinal fixation, there is new growth of dens in significant proportion of patients, suggesting atlantoaxial instability as one of the major driving forces of lack of development of dens in this condition.

Surgeon Experience Is the Most Important Predictor of Case Failure Rate for Anterior Odontoid Screw Fixation: A Large Database Study.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective database analysis. OBJECTIVE: Determine risk factors and failure rate of anterior odontoid screw fixation surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Anterior odontoid screw fixation (AOSF) stabilizes type II dens fractures while preserving cervical motion. Despite having potential advantages, AOSF's failure rate and factors contributing to failure remain unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified AOSF patients in the national claims database Pearldiver using CPT code 22318. Failure was defined as the requirement of supplementary posterior fusion surgery in the C1-C2 or occiput-C2 region after the AOSF. We considered potential predictors of failure including age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), surgeon experience, history of osteoporosis, obesity, and tobacco use. Univariate comparison analysis and logistic regression were conducted to identify factors associated with the need for additional posterior surgery. RESULTS: For 2008 identified cases of AOSF, 249 cases (12.4%) required additional posterior fusion. Seventy-one of the 249 cases (28.5%) underwent revision surgery on the same day as the AOSF. Over 86% of revisions (215 cases) occurred within 200 days of the initial procedure. Posterior fusion rates are inversely correlated with surgeon experience, with the most experienced surgeons having a rate of 10.0%, followed by 11.5% for moderately experienced surgeons, and 15.0% for the least experienced surgeons. When comparing moderate and inexperienced surgeons to experienced surgeons, the odds ratios for posterior fusion were 1.18 ( P >0.05) and 1.61 ( P <0.006), respectively. Logistic regression revealed that both lesser experience (odds ratio=1.50) and osteoporosis (odds ratio=1.44) were the only factors significantly associated with failure ( P <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate a correlation between AOSF success and surgeon experience. While currently published results suggest higher success rates, most of this data originates from experienced surgeons and specialized centers, therefore, they may not accurately reflect the failure rate encountered in a more general practice setting. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Surgical management of spinal pathologies in the octogenarian: a narrative review.

Optimal management paradigms of spinal pathologies in the octogenarian population are controversial given the higher incidence of comorbidities with concern for poor prognosis and fear of increased complications associated with surgical management. In this narrative review, we aim to detail the complex clinical considerations when approaching odontoid screw fixation/instrumented fusion, spinal decompression, and spinal fusion in the octogenarian. Literature review was conducted via Google Scholar and PubMed databases, with literature selected based on statistical power and clinical relevance to the following pathologies/surgical techniques: odontoid fracture, surgical decompression, and surgical fusion in the octogenarian. The aforementioned pathologies were selected based on prevalence in the advanced-age population in which surgical screening techniques and management remain nonuniform. Preoperative evaluation of the octogenarian patient increasingly includes frailty, sarcopenia, and osteopenia/osteoporosis assessments. In cases of odontoid fracture, conservative management appears to provide beneficial clinical outcomes with lower rates of complication compared to surgery; however, rates of radiographic odontoid fusion are far lower in conservatively managed patients. Regarding surgical decompression and fusion, the presence of comorbidities may be more predictive of outcome rather than age status, with the advent of minimally invasive techniques providing safety and efficacy in the surgical management of this age cohort. Age status may be less pertinent than previously thought in the decision to pursue spinal surgery for odontoid fracture, spinal decompression, or spinal fusion; however, each of these procedures has respective risks and benefits that must be considered within the context of each patient's comorbidity profile.

Anterior atlantoaxial motion preservation fixation technique for axis complex fractures (odontoid process with Hangman's fractures) and technique notes.

This study aims to investigate the feasibility and efficacy of anterior atlantoaxial motion preservation fixation (AMPF) in treating axis complex fractures involving the odontoid process fracture and Hangman's fractures with C2/3 instability. A retrospective study was conducted on eight patients who underwent AMPF for axis complex fractures at the General Hospital of Central Theater Command from February 2004 to October 2021. The types of axis injuries, reasons for injuries, surgery time, intraoperative blood loss, spinal cord injury classification (American Spinal Injury Association, ASIA), as well as complications and technical notes, were documented. This study included eight cases of type II Hangman's fracture, five cases of type II and three cases of type III odontoid process fracture. Five patients experienced traffic accidents, while three patients experienced falling injuries. All patients underwent AMPF surgery with an average intraoperative blood loss of 288.75 mL and a duration of 174.5 min. Two patients experienced dysphagia 1 month after surgery. The patients were followed up for an average of 15.63 months. One case improved from C to E in terms of neurological condition, three cases improved from D to E, and four cases remained at E. Bony fusion and Atlantoaxial Motion Preservation were successfully achieved for all eight patients. AMPF is a feasible and effective way for simultaneous odontoid process fracture and Hangman's fractures with C2/3 instability, while preserving atlantoaxial movement.

Odontoid/Dens Fractures.

Odontoid fractures remain the most common C2 fracture and of those individuals older than 65 years. The type of optimal management remains in question given comorbidities, risk of nonunion, and limitations in mobility when surgical fusion is the treatment selected. These fractures are of particular importance, given the high incident of morbidity and mortality following an odontoid fracture. Overall quality of life remains a significant consideration when selecting the best intervention following careful examination and confirmation with radiographic imaging. The literature continues with controversies in the best treatment interventions for these fractures, resulting in a case-by-case decision-making process.

Combined Anterior Odontoid Screw Fixation and C1-C2 Jefferson Fracture Anterior Fixation: A Step-by-Step Technical Note.

BACKGROUND: Combined triple atlas (C1)-axis (C2) fixation has been described in previous literature as a safe, effective, and minimally invasive procedure for complex atlas and odontoid fractures that allows for a greater range of motion compared with posterior approaches and atlanto-occipital fusion. However, it is rarely performed due to the occipital-cervical diastasis resulting from often-fractured C1 joint masses. No evidence-based consensus has been reached regarding the treatment of complex atlantoaxial fractures, and the choice of surgical strategy is based only on clinical experience. METHODS: We report the combined triple C1-C2 fixation technique with manual reduction of the joint masses during patient positioning on the operating table, which allowed for effective stabilization during a single surgical session. We describe our experience in the management of a 75-year-old patient presenting with an acute complex type II fracture of C1, which also involved 1 lateral mass, combined with a type II odontoid fracture and occipital-cervical diastasis. RESULTS: We provide a step-by-step guide for combined triple C1-C2 anterior fixation with manual fracture reduction and describe the clinical case of an acute complex type II fracture of C1, which also involved 1 lateral mass, combined with a type II odontoid fracture and occipital-cervical diastasis. CONCLUSIONS: Combined triple C1-C2 fixation represents a safe and efficient minimally invasive anterior approach for complex type II fractures of C1 with type II odontoid fractures. Manual reduction of the joint masses during patient positioning allows for effective stabilization in a single surgical session.

Odontoid incidence: a constant cervical anatomical feature evident in standing plain radiographs and supine magnetic resonance images.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether there is a difference between measurements of odontoid incidence (OI) and other cervical sagittal parameters by X-ray radiography and those by supine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: Standing X-ray and supine MRI images of 42 healthy subjects were retrospectively analyzed. Surgimap software was employed to measure cervical sagittal parameters including OI, odontoid tilt (OT), C2 slope (C2S), C0-2 angle, C2-7 angle, T1 slope (T1S) and T1S-cervical lordosis (CL). Paired samples t-test was applied to determine the difference between parameters measured by standing X-ray and those by supine MRI. In addition, the statistical correlation between the parameters were compared. The prediction of CL was performed and validated using the formula CL = 0.36 × OI - 0.67 × OT - 0.69 × T1S. RESULTS: Significant correlations and differences were found between cervical sagittal parameters determined by X-ray and those by MRI. OI was verified to be a constant anatomic parameter and the formula CL = 0.36 × OI - 0.67 × OT - 0.69 × T1S can be used to predict CL in cervical sagittal parameters. CONCLUSIONS: OI is verified as a constant anatomic parameter, demonstrating the necessity of a combined assessment of cervical sagittal balance by using standing X-ray and supine MRI. The formula CL = 0.36 × OI - 0.67 × OT - 0.69 × T1S can be applied to predict CL in cervical sagittal parameters.

Evidence and Controversies in Geriatric Odontoid Fracture Management.

Geriatric odontoid fractures are some of the most common spine injuries in our aging population, and their prevalence is only continuing to increase. Despite several investigational studies, treatment remains controversial and there is limited conclusive evidence regarding the management of odontoid fractures. These injuries typically occur in medically complex and frail geriatric patients with poor bone quality, making their treatment particularly challenging. In this article, we review the evidence for conservative management as well as surgical intervention and discuss various treatment strategies. Given the high morbidity and mortality associated with odontoid fractures in the elderly, thoughtful consideration and an emphasis on patient-centered goals of treatment are critical to maximize function in this vulnerable population.