Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 965
Filter
2.
Health Qual Life Outcomes ; 22(1): 65, 2024 Aug 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39153981

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in clinical research increases and use of heterogeneous instruments reflects how well diverse traits are captured by a medical specialty. In order to reflect the heterogeneity of current PROM use in ophthalmology, we reviewed the available literature. METHODS: The medical literature database Web of Science was searched for the most cited articles in clinical ophthalmology. Titles, abstracts and full text articles were reviewed for the use of PROMs and a list of the 100 most cited articles using PROMs was obtained and stratified by year of publication. RESULTS: A total of 1,996 articles were screened. Seventy-seven out of the 100 articles identified included one PROM, and the average number of instruments was 1.5 ± 1.1. The most widely used PROMs were the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (33%), the Ocular Surface Disease Index (14%) and the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form (13%). A simulation analysis suggested that the distribution of PROM use in ophthalmology study did not significantly differ from a power law distribution. Twenty-two percent and fifteen percent of articles did not reference and did not specify the PROM used, respectively. This rate decreased in the more recently published articles (p = 0.041). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the heterogeneity of PROMs applied in ophthalmology studies is low. The selection of PROMs for clinical studies should be done carefully, depending on the research goal.


Subject(s)
Ophthalmology , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Humans , Ophthalmology/statistics & numerical data , Biomedical Research , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
Jpn J Ophthalmol ; 68(5): 443-462, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39002076

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate changes in cataract and refractive surgery practice patterns among members of the Japanese Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (JSCRS) over the past 20 years. STUDY DESIGN: Questionnaire survey study. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Clinical surveys were conducted annually between February and April from 2004 to 2023. Survey questions covered various areas, including cataract surgical techniques, anesthesia, endophthalmitis prophylaxis, toric and presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses (IOLs), complications, and refractive surgery. RESULTS: The highest (n=554 [36.8%]) and lowest (n=316 [19.1%]) numbers of responses were collected in 2012 and 2016, respectively. In perioperative management, the intraoperative use of polyvinyl alcohol-iodine solution and topical antibiotic prescription 3 days before surgery has increased. The use of intracameral injection at the end of surgery has also significantly increased, although it has not been established as common practice. In anesthesia, there is a clear polarization between the use of topical drops and tenon injection. The use of toric IOLs and presbyopia-correcting IOLs has significantly increased from 2010 to 2023. In the latter, the use of trifocal IOLs has particularly increased. Regarding IOL power calculations, the Barrett True K and the Barrett Universal II formulas are rapidly gaining popularity for application with and without post-laser vision correction, respectively. In refractive surgery, phakic IOLs and corneal refractive therapy have attracted considerable interest, followed by laser in situ keratomileusis. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of annual clinical survey data over the past two decades provided valuable insights into the shifting practice patterns and clinical opinions among JSCRS members.


Subject(s)
Cataract Extraction , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Refractive Surgical Procedures , Societies, Medical , Humans , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/trends , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Refractive Surgical Procedures/trends , Cataract Extraction/trends , Surveys and Questionnaires , Japan/epidemiology , Ophthalmology/statistics & numerical data , Male , Female , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged
4.
N Z Med J ; 137(1599): 27-36, 2024 Jul 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39024582

ABSTRACT

AIM: The aim of this study was to update and project the growth of ophthalmologists in New Zealand. This will help decision makers better understand the current ophthalmologist workforce and make appropriate resource allocations. METHOD: Supply and demographics of ophthalmologists in New Zealand were obtained from the Medical Council of New Zealand, Health Workforce New Zealand and Health New Zealand - Te Whatu Ora. Ophthalmology trainee numbers were extracted from the annual reports of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Ophthalmologists (RANZCO). New Zealand population statistics were extracted from the Stats NZ database. A simulation model was developed to project the growth of ophthalmologists from 2024 to 2050. RESULTS: In March 2023, there were 175 practising ophthalmologists in New Zealand. Overall, there were 34.0 ophthalmologists per million population, with 201.4 ophthalmologists per million for those aged ≥65 years. To maintain the current ratio, an additional 20 practising ophthalmologists are needed by 2050. CONCLUSION: The ratio of ophthalmologists per million population aged ≥65 years is projected to drop by 1.5% annually. To meet the demand of an increasing and ageing population, and RANZCO's goal of 40 ophthalmologists per million population, there needs to be an increase in ophthalmologist training positions from the current 5-year average of 6.6 to 11 new trainees annually, and a more effective distribution of the ophthalmologist workforce.


Subject(s)
Ophthalmologists , Ophthalmology , New Zealand , Humans , Ophthalmologists/statistics & numerical data , Ophthalmologists/supply & distribution , Ophthalmology/education , Ophthalmology/statistics & numerical data , Forecasting , Aged , Health Workforce/trends , Health Workforce/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Female , Adult , Workforce/statistics & numerical data
5.
J AAPOS ; 28(4): 103963, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38955242

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Studies describe poor follow-up among children in ophthalmology prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Although the pandemic led to worse adherence for routine medical care in children, little information exists on pediatric ophthalmology follow-up adherence during COVID-19. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on follow-up adherence for children with eye disease, and identified characteristics associated with follow-up adherence. METHODS: In this single-center study, the medical records of 519 new pediatric (≤18 years of age) patients seen during January, April, August, and December 2019 and 2021 were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were classified into two groups: adherent (patients who followed up within 30 days of recommended appointment time) or less-adherent (patients who followed up >30 days after recommended follow-up or never). Main outcome measure was patient adherence status. RESULTS: Follow-up adherence was similar before and during the COVID-19 pandemic (50.4% for 2019 and 49.6% for 2021 [P = 0.40]). Patients that were less likely to be adherent in both univariate and multivariable analyses included those with public insurance (adjusted OR = 0.63 [95% CI, 0.40-1.00]; P = 0.05), and those recommended to follow-up ≥3 months (adjusted OR ≤ 0.10; P < 0.001). In addition, in univariate analysis, those who declined to self-report race (OR = 0.53 [95% CI, 0.29-0.95]; P = 0.04) and those seen by optometrists (OR = 0.42 [95% CI, 0.29-0.60]; P < 0.001) were less likely to be adherent, while patients who traveled ≥177 miles to their provider were more likely to be adherent (OR = 2.88 [95% CI, 1.17-7.55]; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Follow-up adherence for childhood eye care was low but remained relatively stable before and during the COVID-19 pandemic; >50% of children were less-adherent.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Ophthalmology , Patient Compliance , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Female , Male , Retrospective Studies , Child , Patient Compliance/statistics & numerical data , Child, Preschool , Ophthalmology/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Follow-Up Studies , Eye Diseases/epidemiology , Eye Diseases/therapy , Infant , Pandemics
7.
Ophthalmology ; 131(10): 1225-1233, 2024 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38697267

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To assess changes in vision care availability at Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) between 2017 and 2021 and whether neighborhood-level demographic social risk factors (SRFs) associated with eye care services provided by FQHCs. DESIGN: Secondary data analysis of the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) data and 2017-2021 American Community Survey (ACS). PARTICIPANTS: Federally Qualified Health Centers. METHODS: Patient and neighborhood characteristics for SRFs were summarized. Differences in FQHCs providing and not providing vision care were compared via Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney tests for continuous measures and chi-square tests for categorical measures. Logistic regression models were used to test the associations between neighborhood measures and FQHCs providing vision care, adjusted for patient characteristics. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for neighborhood-level predictors of FQHCs providing vision care services. RESULTS: Overall, 28.5% of FQHCs (n = 375/1318) provided vision care in 2017 versus 32% (n = 435/1362) in 2021 with some increases and decreases in both the number of FQHCs and those with and without vision services. Only 2.6% of people who accessed FQHC services received eye care in 2021. Among the 435 FQHCs that provided vision care in 2021, 27.1% (n = 118) had added vision services between 2017 and 2021, 71.5% (n = 311) had been offering vision services since at least 2017, and 1.4% (n = 6) were newly established. FQHCs providing vision care in 2021 were more likely to be in neighborhoods with a higher percentage of Hispanic/Latino individuals (OR, 1.08, 95% CI, 1.02-1.14, P = 0.0094), Medicaid-insured individuals (OR, 1.08, 95% CI, 1.02-1.14, P = 0.0120), and no car households (OR, 1.07, 95% CI, 1.01-1.13, P = 0.0142). However, FQHCs with vision care, compared to FQHCs without vision care, served a lower percentage of Hispanic/Latino individuals (27.2% vs. 33.9%, P = 0.0007), Medicaid-insured patients (42.8% vs. 46.8%, P < 0.0001), and patients living at or below 100% of the federal poverty line (61.3% vs. 66.3%, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Vision care services are available at a few FQHCs, localized to a few states. Expanding eye care access at FQHCs would meet patients where they seek care to mitigate vision loss to underserved communities. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.


Subject(s)
Health Services Accessibility , Humans , United States , Male , Female , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Adult , Aged , Ophthalmology/statistics & numerical data , Ophthalmology/organization & administration , Adolescent , Safety-net Providers/statistics & numerical data , Odds Ratio , Young Adult
8.
J AAPOS ; 28(3): 103936, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38729255

ABSTRACT

Presently, little is known regarding the characteristics and publication rates of registered strabismus trials from ClinicalTrials.gov. We queried registered strabismus trials that were completed prior to January 1, 2021, from ClinicalTrials.gov. Publication of trials in peer-reviewed journals was confirmed using PubMed.gov, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar. Of the 117 trials found, only 69 (59%) were published with a publication delay of nearly 2.5 years. Interventional trials were associated with publication status compared with observational trials. The low publication rates and significant publication delay indicate potential bias in information dissemination of completed strabismus trials.


Subject(s)
Clinical Trials as Topic , Registries , Strabismus , Humans , Clinical Trials as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Databases, Factual , Ophthalmology/statistics & numerical data , Periodicals as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Strabismus/therapy , United States
9.
BMC Ophthalmol ; 24(1): 221, 2024 May 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38802768

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although school screenings identify children with vision problems and issue referrals for medical treatment at an ophthalmic hospital, the effectiveness of this approach remains unverified. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of ophthalmic clinical services on the onset and progression of myopia in preschool children identified with vision impairment. METHODS: Using data from the Shanghai Child and Adolescent Large-scale Eye Study (SCALE), this retrospective cohort study evaluated the visual development of children from three districts-Jing'an, Minhang, and Pudong-which are representative of geographic diversity and economic disparity in Shanghai's 17 districts. Initially, in 2015, the study encompassed 14,572 children aged 4-6 years, of whom 5,917 needed a referral. Our cohort consisted of 5,511 children who had two or more vision screenings and complete personal information over the follow-up period from January 2015 to December 2020. We divided these children into two groups based on their initial spherical equivalent (SE): a High-risk group (SE > -0.5 D) and a Myopia group (SE ≤ -0.5 D). Within each of these groups, we further categorized children into Never, Tardily, and Timely groups based on their referral compliance to compare the differences in the occurrence and progression of myopia. Cox proportional models were applied to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for myopia incidence per person-years of follow-up in High-risk group. Generalized additive models(GAM) was used to calculating the progression for annual spherical equivalent changes in all children. RESULTS: Of the 5,511 preschool children (mean age, 5.25 years; 52.24% male) who received a referral recommendation, 1,327 (24.08%) sought clinical services at an ophthalmic hospital. After six years of follow-up, 65.53% of children developed myopia. The six-year cumulative incidence of myopia in the Never, Tardily, and Timely groups was 64.76%, 69.31%, and 57.14%, respectively. These percentages corresponded to hazard ratios (HRs) of 1.31 (95% CI, 1.10-1.55) for the Tardily group and 0.55 (95% CI, 0.33-0.93) for the Timely group, compared with the Never group. The HRs were adjusted for age, sex, and SE at study entry. Interestingly, the Timely group showed significantly less SE progression than the other groups (P < 0.001), and SE progression was higher in the High-risk group (-0.33 ± 0.37D/year) than in children with myopia (-0.08 ± 0.55D/year). CONCLUSION: Timely utilization of ophthalmic clinical services among children aged 4 to 6 years who fail school vision screenings can significantly reduce the incidence of myopia and slow SE progression.


Subject(s)
Disease Progression , Myopia , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Male , Child, Preschool , Female , Child , China/epidemiology , Myopia/epidemiology , Myopia/physiopathology , Myopia/therapy , Incidence , Visual Acuity/physiology , Vision Screening/methods , Ophthalmology/statistics & numerical data , Follow-Up Studies , Refraction, Ocular/physiology , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data
10.
Vestn Oftalmol ; 140(2): 97-101, 2024.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38742505

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study analyzes the structure of eye diseases in children of different age groups based on the materials of the ophthalmology department of the Tashkent Pediatric Medical Institute (TPMI) clinic for 2018-2021. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of statistical coupons was conducted, which included the medical records of 5613 patients of the ophthalmology department of the TPMI clinic. RESULTS: In the age structure of ophthalmopathology in children who received inpatient treatment at the TPMI clinic in 2018-2021, children aged 5 to 14 years (49.5%) and 1 to 5 years (30.7%) were significantly predominant. The proportion of patients under 1 year old was 11.2% and from 14 to 18 years old - 7.5%. Congenital glaucoma (41%) and lens diseases (30.4%) are characteristic of infants (from 0 to 1 year old); in patients aged 1 to 5 years, lens pathology (37%), congenital glaucoma (25.2%), and injuries (24.7%) were more common; in children aged 5 to 14 years, the pathology of the oculomotor apparatus (32%) and injuries (27.7%) prevailed; in the age group from 14 to 18 years, lens diseases (28.4%) and injuries of the organ of vision (28.1%) were detected more often. CONCLUSIONS: The revealed age aspects of nosologies are due to the timing of clinical manifestations of the pathology, late seeking ophthalmic care of parents, presence of a concomitant pathology in the child, which prevents surgical treatment. The results of the study will help optimize planned and emergency ophthalmological care for children in the regions of the republic.


Subject(s)
Eye Diseases , Humans , Child , Child, Preschool , Adolescent , Male , Female , Eye Diseases/epidemiology , Eye Diseases/diagnosis , Infant , Retrospective Studies , Uzbekistan/epidemiology , Ophthalmology/statistics & numerical data
11.
Eye (Lond) ; 38(13): 2545-2551, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38605075

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cases of uveitis can necessitate long-term treatment resulting in recurrent follow-up appointments. Analysing the demographic distribution and patient factors influencing treatment and time spent with physicians in this population compared to other subspecialties of ophthalmology using the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) has not previously been studied. METHODS: Data were extracted from the NAMCS database, a large, nationally representative survey of office-based specialists, entered between 2012-2016 and 2018. Demographics, time with physician, and payor types were compared between patients with a uveitis-related diagnosis codes versus all other ophthalmic subspecialty diagnoses. RESULTS: Overall, 12,870 ophthalmic patients were included of which 300 had uveitis-related diagnosis codes. Uveitis patients were more likely to be non-Caucasian (p < 0.0001 to p = 0.022), visiting the physician's office due to flare of or treatment for a chronic medical problem (p < 0.0001 to p = 0.022). Adjusted for age, sex, race, and ethnicity, uveitis patients spent a significantly longer time (mean 27.5 min) compared to comprehensive ophthalmology patients (mean 25.5 min) with their physician (p = 0.0041). Among the uveitis patient population, African American patients (p = 0.0053), Hispanic or Latino (p = 0.034), and Medicaid (p = 0.035) patients had increased office visit times. CONCLUSIONS: Those with uveitis spent more time with the physician than comprehensive patients. Race, ethnicity, payor type, and the major reason for the visit all significantly impacted uveitis office visit times. In order to manage their schedules, providers should be aware of the additional support and time needed by these patients during office visits.


Subject(s)
Health Care Surveys , Ophthalmology , Uveitis , Humans , Uveitis/therapy , Male , Female , Ophthalmology/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , United States/epidemiology , Adult , Ambulatory Care/statistics & numerical data , Time Factors , Office Visits/statistics & numerical data , Aged
12.
Gesundheitswesen ; 86(8-09): 587-592, 2024 Aug.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38565191

ABSTRACT

The shortage of specialists in SHI-accredited medical care is increasingly affecting medical assistants (MFA) in medical practices and Medical Care Center (MVZ). Training can mitigate the associated problems in the future, but currently only 42% of practices provide training. A survey of a sample of large ophthalmic centers was conducted to test the hypothesis that larger practices and MVZs provide disproportionate training. In addition, an interaction between ownership (physician-owned (äE); third-party owned (F)) and training engagement was evaluated. In a questionnaire-based complete survey (2022) of large ophthalmic centers of different ownerships organized in a network, the training rate by main operating site (HBS), the number of MFA trainees (MFA-A) per HBS, staffing problems and planned change in training commitment were collected. The distribution measures of the quantitative data were analyzed overall and separately by sponsoring organization and tested for significance.Results were compared to data from a representative survey (2020/2021) of all practices and MVZs. In order to determine the proportion of all ophthalmic MFA-A accounted for by the sample, their total number was determined in an extrapolation. The training rate of the total of 100 HBS of the 14 surveyed centers (11 äE, 3 F) of the sample was 82% (äE: 93%, F: 79%), which was higher than the representative survey (41%). In the sample, there were on average 5.9 MFA-A per HBS (äE: 5.6, F: 7.1), in the comparative survey 1.5. 50% of the centers in the sample reported staffing problems, 25% wanted to expand their training commitment; the comparative values of the representative survey were 11% for both parameters. Stratified by sponsorship, neither training rate nor MFA-A per HBS showed significant differences. According to projections, there were nearly 1,966 MFA-A working in ophthalmology in 2021, of which 19.5% were at centers in the study population. Of all the MFA-A in the sample, 71% were at the significantly larger centers by number of HBS owned by third-party. The survey confirms the positive correlation between the size of practices and MVZ and commitment to training. There are no significant differences according to the ownership of organization.


Subject(s)
Ophthalmology , Germany , Ophthalmology/education , Ophthalmology/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , Humans , Ophthalmic Assistants/statistics & numerical data , Ophthalmic Assistants/education
13.
J Fr Ophtalmol ; 47(6): 104177, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38603895

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The study aimed to discern the intent to treat with the therapeutic agents prescribed first or second line in the following eye conditions: neovascular age-related macular Degeneration (nAMD), diabetic macular edema (DME), retinal vein occlusion (RVO), and myopic maculopathy with choroidal neovascularization (MMNV). The study also aimed to distinguish the ophthalmologists' intended treatment for their patients from those that they would prescribe for themselves if they were affected by the above macular conditions. METHODS: The study utilized an online survey of 243 French ophthalmologists practicing medical retina, with males accounting for 54.3% of the participants. Data was obtained using a questionnaire that focused on the ophthalmologists' experience with various agents as well as their first and second line choices for nAMD, DME, RVO, and MMNV. RESULTS: The vast majority of French ophthalmologists (99%) had experience with the most widely used anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (anti-VEGFs); ranibizumab, bevacizumab, and aflibercept. Fewer than 8% reported experience with anti-VEGF drug reservoirs, biosimilars, or faricimab. The study findings also showed ranibizumab and aflibercept as the commonly prescribed first line choices for the above-mentioned ocular conditions. For the second line choice, the study showed that aflibercept and dexamethasone intravitreal implants were the most common across the four retinal conditions studied. The only difference in intent to treat for "patients" versus "yourself" was for biosimilars (0% to 0.8%, P=0.001). CONCLUSION: The findings regarding the first and second line choices for the mentioned ocular disorders were found to agree with the findings of published literature currently used in practice, with a tendency to prefer ranibizumab as first line therapy for neovascular disorders and aflibercept as first line therapy for macular edema. In addition, there were no differences between choices for first and second line therapy for patients vs. ophthalmologists.


Subject(s)
Ophthalmologists , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Retinal Diseases , Humans , Male , Ophthalmologists/statistics & numerical data , Retinal Diseases/drug therapy , Retinal Diseases/epidemiology , Retinal Diseases/therapy , Female , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , France/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Adult , Ophthalmology/statistics & numerical data , Ophthalmology/standards , Retinal Vein Occlusion/drug therapy , Retinal Vein Occlusion/complications , Retinal Vein Occlusion/epidemiology
15.
Acta Med Port ; 37(6): 419-428, 2024 Jun 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38477300

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Human resources in ophthalmology have recently received particular attention, and it has been questioned whether there is a sufficient number of workers. The aim of this study was to analyze and characterize Portugal's ophthalmologist population. METHODS: In this descriptive, cross-sectional study, an online questionnaire was sent to all ophthalmologists registered with the Portuguese College of Ophthalmology in December 2021. Information on the following variables was collected and analyzed: demographic factors, professional qualifications, professional activity, weekly professional activity and medium-term plans. RESULTS: Among the 910 registered ophthalmologists, a response rate of 64.7% was achieved. There were 0.9 ophthalmologists for every 10 000 inhabitants, 0.45:10 000 working in the public sector (0.35:10 000 full-time equivalent). Among the respondents, 57.6% were over 50 years old (59.6% male), 97.3% were Portuguese, 46.7% completed their residency in the Lisbon region, 27.3% complemented their programme with additional training, 9.5% had a PhD and approximately 58% lived and worked in large urban centres. Regarding professional activity, 58.5% of the respondents worked in the public sector (4.2% exclusively), while 67.9% worked in different economic sectors. The median number of weekly working hours reported was 45 hours, with those in the public sector reporting 35 hours. Private/social sector work and public sector work accounted for 12 926 hours/week and 10 808 hours/week, respectively. It was found that 31.4% of the respondents provided emergency medical services and that 52.8% performed surgical procedures more than once a week. Looking ahead, 38.7% of the ophthalmologists intended to reduce their workload within the next five years due to family reasons, fatigue and demotivation. The projected rate of retirement or cessation of activity in the next five years was estimated to be 1.7%, while an average of 20 new ophthalmologists are expected to enter the profession annually, resulting in a generational balance of 0.8%. CONCLUSION: While the number of ophthalmologists in Portugal meets the international recommendations, there is a shortage in the public sector and most ophthalmologists work in large urban centres. The number of ophthalmologists in Portugal is expected to be stable for the next five years.


Subject(s)
Ophthalmologists , Portugal , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Ophthalmologists/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Ophthalmology/statistics & numerical data , Censuses , Surveys and Questionnaires , Public Sector/statistics & numerical data
16.
Eye (Lond) ; 38(9): 1702-1706, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38454172

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate whether the use of the silicone tipped irrigation/aspiration (I/A) handpiece CapsuleGuard® (Bausch + Lomb, Laval, Canada) reduced rates of posterior capsule rupture (PCR) during cataract surgery. METHODS: Royal College of Ophthalmologists' National Ophthalmology Database (NOD) Cataract Audit data from 01/04/2010 and 31/03/2021 and Bausch + Lomb sales figures were combined to identify centres participating in national cataract audit who have routinely adopted the silicone tipped I/A handpiece, CapsuleGuard®. Data were included only from centres with eligible cataract operations recorded on the NOD both before and after adopting CapsuleGuard®. Review of the literature was undertaken to estimate the proportion of PCR that occurs during I/A, to evaluate the impact of adoption of CapsuleGuard® on PCR occurring in this phase of surgery. RESULTS: Within the study period, 267 371 eligible cataract operations were performed in 14 centres with >50 eligible operations both before and after adopting CapsuleGuard®. Within centres adopting CapsuleGuard®, the rate of PCR occurrence reduction was 16.4%. Before and after the adoption of CapsuleGuard® the median change of PCR was 21.7% reduction (IQR: 4.8% to 37.7% reduction). CONCLUSIONS: A reduction in the rate of PCR was seen after regular adoption of CapsuleGuard® during cataract operations. Review of published studies attributing PCR to various components of the cataract operation suggest around 25% of PCR may occur during I/A; adoption of CapsuleGuard may, therefore, be associated with avoidance of a substantial proportion of the PCR during that phase of surgery.


Subject(s)
Cataract Extraction , Databases, Factual , Ophthalmology , Posterior Capsular Rupture, Ocular , Humans , Cataract Extraction/statistics & numerical data , Posterior Capsular Rupture, Ocular/epidemiology , Posterior Capsular Rupture, Ocular/etiology , Ophthalmology/statistics & numerical data , Male , United Kingdom/epidemiology , Female , Therapeutic Irrigation/statistics & numerical data , Aged
17.
Cornea ; 43(9): 1108-1114, 2024 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38381040

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to provide relative citation ratio (RCR) benchmark data for cornea and external diseases specialists. DESIGN: This is a cross-sectional bibliometric analysis. SUBJECTS: Subjects included were fellowship-trained cornea and external diseases faculty at Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited institutions in the United States. METHODS: Academic specialists were indexed using the National Institutes of Health iCite Web site. Publication count, mean RCR score, and weighted RCR score were obtained between October 2022 and January 2023 by examining PubMed-listed publications from 1980 to 2022. Data were compared by sex, career duration, academic rank, and acquisition of a Doctor of Philosophy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measures were publication count, mean RCR value, and weighted RCR value. RESULTS: The cohort included 602 specialists from 112 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited institutions. These clinician-scientists produced highly impactful research with a median publication count of 15 (interquartile ranges 4-41), median RCR of 1.4 (interquartile ranges 0.91-1.88), and median-weighted RCR of 20.28 (5.3-66.69). Both academic rank and career length were associated with greater publication count and RCR values. Male sex was also associated with greater publications counts and RCR scores compared with female faculty. Acquisition of a Doctor of Philosophy was associated with greater publication counts and weighted RCR scores but no difference in mean RCR scores. CONCLUSIONS: Academic cornea and external diseases specialists conduct high-impact research, with a median RCR of 1.4, exceeding the NIH standard value of 1. These data provide RCR benchmark data for the field to inform self, institutional, and departmental evaluations. These results also highlight a significant gender disparity in the field necessitating efforts to increase female representation and ensure equal opportunities.


Subject(s)
Bibliometrics , Biomedical Research , Ophthalmologists , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Male , Ophthalmologists/statistics & numerical data , Biomedical Research/statistics & numerical data , United States , Ophthalmology/statistics & numerical data , Refractive Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Corneal Diseases , Efficiency , Education, Medical, Graduate/statistics & numerical data
18.
Semin Ophthalmol ; 39(5): 400-403, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38415757

ABSTRACT

The Journal Impact Factor (JIF) is a widely used metric for ranking journals based on the number of citations garnered by papers published over a specific timeframe. To assess the accuracy of JIF values, I compared citation counts for 30 of my own publications across six major bibliography databases: CrossRef, Web of Science, Publisher records, Google Scholar, PubMed and Scopus. The analysis revealed noteworthy variations in citation counts, ranging from 10% to over 50% between the lowest and highest citation counts. Google Scholar records the highest citation numbers, while PubMed reported the lowest. Notably, Web of Science, whose citation data are used in JIF calculations, tend to underestimate citation counts compared to other databases. These observations raise concerns about the accuracy of JIF calculation based on Web of Science's citation data. The real JIF values for most journals would differ from those annually reported by Clarivate's journal citation reports (JCR). These citation discrepancies underscore the importance of comprehensive data collection and the necessity to include additional citation sources. Not because a paper is cited in one journal rather than another should it have a less or more citation weight. Ultimately, one citation remains one citation, regardless of its origin. Clarivate Analytics may thus need to consider integrating all citation sources for more accurate JIF values. Alternatively, Google Scholar could potentially develop its own journal or citation impact based on its extensive journal citation records. However, while making adjustments to how the Journal Impact Factor is calculated can make it more mathematically precise, it doesn't address the fundamental biases built into the metric. Even with refinements, the Journal Impact Factor will remain skewed due to how it's defined and used.


Subject(s)
Journal Impact Factor , Periodicals as Topic , Humans , Periodicals as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Databases, Bibliographic , Bibliometrics , Ophthalmology/statistics & numerical data
19.
Eye (Lond) ; 38(7): 1386-1389, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38200322

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cataract surgical safety has improved over recent decades, with endophthalmitis rates before 2006 typically 0.13-0.15% compared with the most recent UK national estimate of 0.02%. There remains, however, substantial variation in reported rates from different centres. Due to the low event rate, this disparity may not be noticed and opportunities to improve therefore be missed. We propose a method of monitoring post-cataract endophthalmitis rates that would help centres with higher rates identify this. METHODS: A statistical tool, available to download or use online, permits comparison of local endophthalmitis rate with the estimated UK rate of 0.02%. Centres are encouraged to maintain a register of endophthalmitis cases, and when the number reaches a threshold (X cases), either in a certain time period or in a fixed number of procedures, then the centre can consider itself as an outlier and trigger local investigations to improve infection control. RESULTS: Example outputs are offered, such as for a unit doing 5000 cataracts annually, a value of X is suggested such that the third case of endophthalmitis (X = 3) in a 12-month period would give 85% confidence, the fourth case 90% confidence and the fifth case 95% confidence that the true endophthalmitis rate for that unit was higher than the national average. CONCLUSIONS: This statistical tool provides a basis for units to set a threshold number of cases of endophthalmitis within a given period that would trigger local processes, thus helping inform local monitoring processes for this rare but potentially catastrophic complication of cataract surgery.


Subject(s)
Cataract Extraction , Databases, Factual , Endophthalmitis , Ophthalmology , Humans , Endophthalmitis/epidemiology , Endophthalmitis/prevention & control , Endophthalmitis/etiology , Cataract Extraction/adverse effects , Cataract Extraction/statistics & numerical data , United Kingdom/epidemiology , Ophthalmology/statistics & numerical data , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Societies, Medical
20.
BMC Ophthalmol ; 23(1): 82, 2023 Mar 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36864395

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Communication barriers are a major cause of health disparities for patients with limited English proficiency (LEP). Medical interpreters play an important role in bridging this gap, however the impact of interpreters on outpatient eye center visits has not been studied. We aimed to evaluate the differences in length of eyecare visits between LEP patients self-identifying as requiring a medical interpreter and English speakers at a tertiary, safety-net hospital in the United States. METHODS: A retrospective review of patient encounter metrics collected by our electronic medical record was conducted for all visits between January 1, 2016 and March 13, 2020. Patient demographics, primary language spoken, self-identified need for interpreter and encounter characteristics including new patient status, patient time waiting for providers and time in room were collected. We compared visit times by patient's self-identification of need for an interpreter, with our main outcomes being time spent with ophthalmic technician, time spent with eyecare provider, and time waiting for eyecare provider. Interpreter services at our hospital are typically remote (via phone or video). RESULTS: A total of 87,157 patient encounters were analyzed, of which 26,443 (30.3%) involved LEP patients identifying as requiring an interpreter. After adjusting for patient age at visit, new patient status, physician status (attending or resident), and repeated patient visits, there was no difference in the length of time spent with technician or physician, or time spent waiting for physician, between English speakers and patients identifying as needing an interpreter. Patients who self-identified as requiring an interpreter were more likely to have an after-visit summary printed for them, and were also more likely to keep their appointment once it was made when compared to English speakers. CONCLUSIONS: Encounters with LEP patients who identify as requiring an interpreter were expected to be longer than those who did not indicate need for an interpreter, however we found that there was no difference in the length of time spent with technician or physician. This suggests providers may adjust their communication strategy during encounters with LEP patients identifying as needing an interpreter. Eyecare providers must be aware of this to prevent negative impacts on patient care. Equally important, healthcare systems should consider ways to prevent unreimbursed extra time from being a financial disincentive for seeing patients who request interpreter services.


Subject(s)
Health Status Disparities , Healthcare Disparities , Language , Limited English Proficiency , Ophthalmology , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital , Humans , Healthcare Disparities/standards , Healthcare Disparities/statistics & numerical data , Ambulatory Care/standards , Ambulatory Care/statistics & numerical data , Safety-net Providers/standards , Safety-net Providers/statistics & numerical data , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital/standards , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , United States/epidemiology , Ophthalmology/standards , Ophthalmology/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL