ABSTRACT
Routine screening of organ donors to detect human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection has detected the rare transmission of the virus through organ transplantation. However, despite routine screening, HIV transmission remains a risk in organ transplantation since, unlike tissues, solid organs cannot be processed, disinfected, or modified to inactivate infectious pathogens. A case of possible transmission of HIV by organ transplant is described below, from a previously seronegative donor to two recipients.
El examen de rutina de los donantes de órganos para detectar la infección por el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana (HIV) ha hecho que la transmisión del virus mediante el trasplante de órganos sea poco común. Sin embargo, a pesar de las pruebas de detección de rutina, la transmisión del HIV continúa siendo un riesgo del trasplante de órganos ya que, a diferencia de los tejidos, los órganos sólidos no se pueden procesar, desinfectar, ni modificar para inactivar patógenos infecciosos. A continuación, se describe un caso de posible transmisión de HIV por trasplante de órganos de un donante previamente seronegativo a dos de sus receptores.
Subject(s)
HIV Infections , Humans , HIV Infections/transmission , Male , Middle Aged , Kidney Transplantation , Female , Adult , Organ Transplantation/adverse effects , Tissue DonorsABSTRACT
Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients are particularly susceptible to infections caused by multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) and are often the first to be affected by an emerging resistant pathogen. Unfortunately, their prevalence and impact on morbidity and mortality according to the type of graft is not systematically reported from high-as well as from low and middle-income countries (HIC and LMIC). Thus, epidemiology on MDRO in SOT recipients could be subjected to reporting bias. In addition, screening practices and diagnostic resources may vary between countries, as well as the availability of new drugs. In this review, we aimed to depict the burden of main Gram-negative MDRO in SOT patients across HIC and LMIC and to provide an overview of current diagnostic and therapeutic resources.
Subject(s)
Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Organ Transplantation , Humans , Organ Transplantation/adverse effects , Transplant Recipients , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Prevalence , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Developing CountriesABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Obesity is frequent among organ transplant recipients, increasing the risk of acute graft rejection and overall morbimortality. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) effectively improves graft survival and associated comorbidities. We first compared 30-d outcomes between chronic immunosuppressed (CI) and nonchronic immunosuppressed (non-CI) patients. Then, between organ transplant and non-organ transplant CI patients who underwent LSG. METHODS: Patients who underwent LSG within the metabolic and bariatric surgery accreditation and quality improvement program 2017-2019 were included. Using 1:1 and 1:4 propensity score matching analysis, the cohorts were matched for 30 characteristics. We then compared 30-d outcomes between CI and non-CI (analysis 1) and between organ transplant and non-organ transplant CI patients who underwent LSG (analysis 2). RESULTS: A total of 486,576 patients were included. The matched cohorts in analysis 1 (n = 8978) and analysis 2 (n = 1152, n = 371) had similar preoperative characteristics. Propensity score matching in analysis 1 showed that patients in the CI group had significantly higher rates of renal complications (0.4% versus 0.2%, P = 0.006), unplanned intensive care unit admission (1.1% versus 0.7%, P = 0.003), blood transfusions (1.1% versus 0.7%, P = 0.003), readmissions (4.6% versus 3.5%, P < 0.001), reoperations (1.4% versus 1.0%, P = 0.033), interventions (1.3% versus 1.0%, P = 0.026), and postoperative bleeding (0.6% versus 0.4%, P = 0.013). In analysis 2, patients with organ transplant CI had a higher rate of pulmonary complications (1.1% versus 0.3%, P = 0.043), renal complications (2.4% versus 0.2%, P < 0.001), blood transfusions (6.5% versus 1.3%, P < 0.001), and readmissions (10.0% versus 4.6%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with transplant-related CI who underwent LSG have higher 30-d postoperative complication rates compared to nontransplant-related CI patients; however, there were no differences in terms of mortality, intensive care unit admissions, staple line leaks, or bleeding. LSG is safe and feasible in this high-risk population.
Subject(s)
Gastrectomy , Organ Transplantation , Postoperative Complications , Humans , Male , Female , Gastrectomy/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Adult , Retrospective Studies , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Organ Transplantation/adverse effects , Propensity Score , Treatment Outcome , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Immunosuppression Therapy/adverse effects , Graft Survival , Graft Rejection/epidemiology , Graft Rejection/immunology , Graft Rejection/etiologyABSTRACT
A substantial number of zoonotic diseases are caused by viral pathogens, representing a significant menace to public health, particularly to susceptible populations, such as pregnant women, the elderly, and immunocompromised individuals. Individuals who have undergone solid organ transplantation frequently experience immunosuppression, to prevent organ rejection, and, thus are more prone to opportunistic infections. Furthermore, the reactivation of dormant viruses can threaten transplant recipients and organ viability. This mini-review examines the up-to-date literature covering potential zoonotic and organ rejection-relevant viruses in solid organ transplant recipients. A comprehensive list of viruses with zoonotic potential is highlighted and the most important clinical outcomes in patients undergoing transplantation are described. Moreover, this mini-review calls attention to complex multifactorial events predisposing viral coinfections and the need for continuous health surveillance and research to understand better viral pathogens' transmission and pathophysiology dynamics in transplanted individuals.
Subject(s)
Immunocompromised Host , Organ Transplantation , Transplant Recipients , Humans , Organ Transplantation/adverse effects , Animals , Virus Diseases/transmission , Virus Diseases/virology , Disease Susceptibility , Zoonoses/transmission , Zoonoses/virology , Viral Zoonoses/transmission , Viral Zoonoses/virology , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection remains one of the most common viral pathogens affecting solid organ transplants (SOT). In 10 years of following the outcome of transplants, we noticed an increased incidence of CMV infection, along with increased use of rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG). The study aims to assess the incidence of active CMV infection and disease, response to treatment, and recurrence in a cohort of SOT. Furthermore, we look for correlating the CMV incidence with the type of induction therapy: r-ATG or interleukin 2 receptor-blocking antibody (basiliximab). METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective 10-year study in patients submitted to kidney, kidney-liver, and kidney-pancreas transplants who used a preemptive therapy protocol for CMV. RESULTS: Among the 476 enrolled transplant recipients, 306 (64.2 %) had at least one episode of CMV infection (replication), and 71/306 patients (23.2 %) presented CMV-related disease. The most frequent clinical conditions associated with CMV disease were gastrointestinal. Among the 476 transplant patients, 333 received immunosuppressive induction with rATG (69.9 %); 140 (29.4 %) received induction with interleukin 2 receptor-blocking antibody (basiliximab). The initial maintenance immunosuppressive therapy in the patients who presented CMV infection was primarily performed with prednisone, tacrolimus, and sodium mycophenolate (91.7 %). The induction with rATG increased from 35.2%-94.6% in 10 years. The incidence of CMV infection was 20.7 % in the first year of observation and gradually increased to 87.3 % in the last year. CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that the increase in the use of rATG in recent years could be responsible for the very expressive increase in the incidence of CMV infection/disease.
Subject(s)
Cytomegalovirus Infections , Kidney Transplantation , Organ Transplantation , Humans , Antilymphocyte Serum/adverse effects , Cytomegalovirus , Basiliximab/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Induction Chemotherapy , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Graft Rejection , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Cytomegalovirus Infections/diagnosis , Cytomegalovirus Infections/epidemiology , Cytomegalovirus Infections/drug therapy , Organ Transplantation/adverse effects , Receptors, Interleukin-2ABSTRACT
Chagas disease in solid organ transplant recipients may present as a primary infection (PI). Early detection is crucial for timely treatment. This is the largest observational multicentre study evaluating qPCR for early diagnosis and treatment monitoring of PI in seronegative recipients of organs from seropositive donors. Of 34 patients admitted at 5 health centers, PI was detected by qPCR in 8 (23.5%) within a posttransplant period of 40 days (interquartile range [IQR], 31-50 days). No PI was detected by the Strout test or clinical symptoms/signs. All patients had favorable treatment outcome with negative qPCR 31 days (IQR, 18-35 days) after treatment, with no posttreatment relapse episodes.
Subject(s)
Chagas Disease , Organ Transplantation , Humans , Follow-Up Studies , Organ Transplantation/adverse effects , Chagas Disease/diagnosis , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Treatment Outcome , Transplant RecipientsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a frequent infectious complication following solid organ transplantation (SOT). Considering significant differences in healthcare systems, a systematic review was conducted to describe the epidemiology, management, and burden of CMV post-SOT in selected countries outside of Europe and North America. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for observational studies in SOT recipients across 15 countries in the regions of Asia, Pacific, and Latin America (search period: January 1, 2011 to September 17, 2021). Outcomes included incidence of CMV infection/disease, recurrence, risk factors, CMV-related mortality, treatment patterns and guidelines, refractory and/or resistant CMV, patient-reported outcomes, and economic burden. RESULTS: Of 2708 studies identified, 49 were eligible (n = 43/49; 87.8% in adults; n = 34/49, 69.4% in kidney recipients). Across studies, selection of CMV preventive strategy was based on CMV serostatus. Overall, rates of CMV infection (within 1 year) and CMV disease post-SOT were respectively, 10.3%-63.2% (9 studies) and 0%-19.0% (17 studies). Recurrence occurred in 35.4%-41.0% cases (3 studies) and up to 5.3% recipients died of CMV-associated causes (11 studies). Conventional treatments for CMV infection/disease included ganciclovir (GCV) or valganciclovir. Up to 4.4% patients were resistant to treatment (3 studies); no studies reported on refractory CMV. Treatment-related adverse events with GCV included neutropenia (2%-29%), anemia (13%-48%), leukopenia (11%-37%), and thrombocytopenia (13%-24%). Data on economic burden were scarce. CONCLUSION: Outside of North America and Europe, rates of CMV infection/disease post-SOT are highly variable and CMV recurrence is frequent. CMV resistance and treatment-associated adverse events, including myelosuppression, highlight unmet needs with conventional therapy.
Subject(s)
Cytomegalovirus Infections , Leukopenia , Organ Transplantation , Adult , Humans , Cytomegalovirus , Cytomegalovirus Infections/drug therapy , Cytomegalovirus Infections/epidemiology , Europe/epidemiology , North America/epidemiology , Ganciclovir , Organ Transplantation/adverse effectsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: This study was designed to discuss the time elapsed between cell, tissue, and organ donation and transplantation and detection of adverse events notified in São Paulo, Brazil. METHODS: This is a descriptive study with a quantitative approach. Data were provided by the Transplant Center of the state of São Paulo from the "Individual notification form of adverse reactions in Biovigilance" between 2016 and 2019. Analysis was performed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Fifty-two notifications were analyzed, and 3 categories were formed: (1) adverse events detected on the same day of the transplant, 8; (2) adverse events detected between 1 week and 1.5 years after transplant, 40; and (3) adverse events detected 2 years after transplant, 4. CONCLUSION: The discussion on the topic is beginning; however, it is important. Clinical management of transplant recipients and comprehending what is considered an adverse event and the natural course of a patient's life can impact clinical decision-making, public policies, and patient safety research. This study highlights the need to investigate related factors to adverse events, especially the time between the transplant procedure and adverse event detection, to establish clinical guidelines.
Subject(s)
Organ Transplantation , Tissue and Organ Procurement , Transplants , Humans , Brazil , Organ Transplantation/adverse effects , Patient SafetyABSTRACT
Introduction: Booster doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines improve seroconversion rates in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) but the impact of homologous and heterologous booster doses in neutralizing antibody (NAb) titers and their ability to interfere with the variant of concern Omicron are not well studied. Methods: We designed a prospective, open-label, observational clinical cohort study. 45 participants received two doses of BNT162b2 or CoronaVac (21-day or 28-day intervals, respectively) followed by a first and second booster with BNT162b2 (5-month apart each) and we analyzed the neutralizing antibody titers against SARSCoV-2 D614G (B.1 lineage) and Omicron (BA.1 lineage). Results: Our results show that SOTRs receiving an initial two-dose scheme of CoronaVac or BNT162b2 generate lower NAbs titers against the ancestral variant of SARS-CoV-2 when compared with healthy controls. Although these NAb titers were further decreased against the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron, a single BNT162b2 booster in both groups was sufficient to increase NAb titers against the variant of concern. More importantly, this effect was only observed in those participants responding to the first two shots but not in those not responding to the initial vaccination scheme. Discussion: The data provided here demonstrate the importance of monitoring antibody responses in immunocompromised subjects when planning booster vaccination programs in this risk group.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Organ Transplantation , Humans , Antibodies, Neutralizing , BNT162 Vaccine , Cohort Studies , COVID-19 Vaccines , Organ Transplantation/adverse effects , Prospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
Cryptococcosis is traditionally associated with immunocompromised patients but is increasingly being identified in those without the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or other immunocompetent individuals. We aim to describe the characteristics, mortality, and associated variables with death among hospitalized patients with cryptococcosis in Brazil. This is the first multicenter retrospective cohort study conducted in seven public tertiary Brazilian hospitals. A total of 384 patients were included; the median age was 39 years and 283 (73.7%) were men. In all, 304 HIV-positive were hosts (79.2%), 16 (4.2%) solid organ transplant (SOT), and 64 (16.7%) non-HIV-positive/non-transplant (NHNT). Central nervous system (CNS) cryptococcosis had a significantly higher number across disease categories, with 313 cases (81.5%). A total of 271 (70.6%) patients were discharged and 113 (29.4%) died during hospitalization. In-hospital mortality among HIV-positive, SOT, and NHNT was 30.3% (92/304), 12.5% (2/16), and 29.7% (19/64), respectively. Induction therapy with conventional amphotericin B (AMB) mainly in combination with fluconazole (234; 84.2%) was the most used. Only 80 (22.3%) patients received an AMB lipid formulation: liposomal (n = 35) and lipid complex (n = 45). Most patients who died belong to the CNS cryptococcosis category (83/113; 73.4%) when compared with the others (P = .017). Multivariate analysis showed that age and disseminated cryptococcosis had a higher risk of death (odds ratio [OR], 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.05; P = .008 and OR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.01-3.53; P = .048, respectively). Understanding the epidemiology of cryptococcosis in our settings will help to recognize the burden and causes of mortality and identify strategies to improve this scenario.
This multicenter cohort study included 384 hospitalized individuals with cryptococcosis in Brazil. Most individuals were men (74%), HIV-positive (79%), had central nervous system involvement (82%), and received conventional amphotericin plus fluconazole (84%). In-hospital mortality was high (29%).
Subject(s)
Cryptococcosis , Organ Transplantation , Male , Animals , Humans , Female , Brazil/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Cryptococcosis/drug therapy , Cryptococcosis/epidemiology , Cryptococcosis/complications , Cryptococcosis/veterinary , Organ Transplantation/adverse effects , Organ Transplantation/veterinary , Amphotericin B/therapeutic use , Lipids/therapeutic use , Antifungal Agents/therapeutic useABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Solid-organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) have a higher risk of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) complications and death and a less powerful and lasting response to vaccines and to natural infection. In Colombia, this population was prioritized in the National Vaccination Plan against COVID-19 and received vaccines from different platforms. The aim of this study was to estimate the effectiveness of the complete vaccination schedule and of the vaccine booster for COVID-19 administered to SOTRs in Colombia. METHODS: A nested-cohort was assembled within the population-based ESPERANZA cohort and included the subset of 16 y and older SOTRs (n = 6963); the follow-up period spanned March 11, 2021, to May 11, 2022. The vaccine effectiveness was estimated with Cox proportional-hazards models so that the overall effectiveness of the complete vaccination schedule, the vaccine booster, each used vaccine, and the homologous and heterologous schedules were estimated, adjusting by the main confounders. RESULTS: The overall effectiveness of being fully vaccinated was 73.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 68.9%-77.0%) to prevent COVID-19 infection, 83.7% (95% CI, 78.7%-87.5%) to prevent hospitalization, and 92.1% (95% CI, 88.8%-94.4%) to prevent death due to COVID-19. Similarly, the effectiveness of the vaccine booster was 76.7% (95% CI, 70.6%-81.5%), 86.9% (95% CI, 79.4%-91.6%), and 94.5% (95% CI, 89.8%-97.1%) to prevent confirmed COVID-19 infection, hospitalization, and death due to COVID-19, respectively. In both cases, there were no statistically significant differences across age groups. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this work show a high protection of vaccination against infection, hospitalization, and death due to COVID-19 in SOTRs, which increases with the vaccine booster.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Organ Transplantation , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Immunization Schedule , Organ Transplantation/adverse effects , Transplant RecipientsABSTRACT
Since March 2022, donors with detectable SARS-CoV-2 RNA have been accepted for extrapulmonary organ transplants in Brazil. In this report, we described 11 successful organ transplants (6 kidney, 5 liver) from 5 asymptomatic infected donors.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Organ Transplantation , Humans , Brazil , Organ Transplantation/adverse effects , RNA, Viral , SARS-CoV-2 , Tissue DonorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The incidence of multidrug resistant organisms (MDROs) infections among solid organ transplant (SOT) patients is very high in Brazil. METHODS: This review will discuss antimicrobial use and resistance in SOT in Brazil, highlighting the main barriers and facilitators for implementation of an antimicrobial stewardship programme (ASP). RESULTS: The most common group of MDROs is carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus. Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CREs) are the most frequent MDROs and have been reported as donor-derived as well. Although ASPs are mandatory in the country, there is a lack of information regarding ASPs in SOT recipients. The main barriers for the implementation of ASPs in Brazilian hospitals are lack of electronic medical records, absence of national guidelines specific to SOT recipients, lack of recommendations on surveillance culture to evaluate colonization and transmission of donor-derived MDROs, limited availability of rapid diagnostic tests, and insufficient pharmacist and clinician time allocated to ASP activities in some SOT centers. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of MDRO infections caused mainly by VREs and CREs is very high in the country. There is limited data regarding antimicrobial use among SOT recipients in Brazil. The absence of antimicrobial stewardship national guidelines specific to SOT recipients is one of the main barriers for the implementation of ASPs in Brazilian hospitals.
Subject(s)
Antimicrobial Stewardship , Organ Transplantation , Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Brazil/epidemiology , Carbapenems , Humans , Organ Transplantation/adverse effects , Transplant Recipients , VancomycinABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to map care technologies being developed to improve treatment adherence in patients undergoing organ transplant. METHODS: A scoping review was developed according to the Joanna Briggs Institute manual. The research question was developed according to the population, concept, and context strategy. Searches were conducted independently in 6 databases between June and August 2021. The data were evaluated and organized together. The review protocol was published. RESULTS: Fifteen articles were part of the study, mostly published in the United States (33.3%) and in 2016 (33.3%). The main research method identified was clinical studies (80%). Most of the care technologies identified are in relation to medication adherence in the post-transplant setting. Another intervention identified was health education action with the support of mobile apps, electronic monitoring systems, and a card game. CONCLUSIONS: The results present technologies directed at the importance of post-transplant drug adherence; however, it is important to adapt the technologies to the reality experienced by the patient, as well as to train patients so that they can introduce these technologies in their daily lives. Furthermore, it is important that technologies are developed that include other aspects of adherence to post-transplant treatment.
Subject(s)
Organ Transplantation , Treatment Adherence and Compliance , Health Education , Humans , Medication Adherence , Organ Transplantation/adverse effects , Research Design , United StatesABSTRACT
Short bowel syndrome is the most common etiology of intestinal failure, resulting from either resections of different intestinal segments or a congenital condition. Due to the absence or considerable reduction of intestinal loops in the abdominal cavity, patients with short bowel syndrome present with atrophy and muscle retraction of the abdominal wall, which leads to loss of abdominal domain and elasticity. This complication is an aggravating factor of intestinal transplantation since it can prevent the primary closure of the abdominal wall. A vast array of surgical techniques to overcome the challenges of the complexity of the abdominal wall have been described in the literature. The aim of our study was to review the modalities of abdominal wall closure in intestinal/multivisceral transplantation. Our study consisted of a systematic review following the methodological instructions described in the PRISMA guidelines. Duplicate studies and studies that did not meet the criteria for the systematic review were excluded, especially those without relevance and an explicit relationship with the investigated theme. After this step, 63 articles were included in our study. The results obtained with these techniques have been encouraging, but a high incidence of wound complications in some reports has raised concerns. There is no consensus among transplantation centers regarding which technique would be ideal and with higher success rates and lower rates of complications.
Subject(s)
Abdominal Wall , Organ Transplantation , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Abdominal Wall/surgery , Humans , Incidence , Intestines/surgery , Organ Transplantation/adverse effects , Organ Transplantation/methods , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methodsSubject(s)
Humans , Female , Adult , Organ Transplantation/adverse effects , Graft Rejection/drug therapy , Immunosuppressive Agents/analysis , Immunosuppressive Agents/pharmacology , Azathioprine/therapeutic use , Tacrolimus/antagonists & inhibitors , Cyclosporine/antagonists & inhibitors , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/administration & dosage , Sirolimus/antagonists & inhibitors , Calcineurin Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Everolimus/antagonists & inhibitors , Mycophenolic Acid/therapeutic useABSTRACT
Malaria is a febrile and potentially fatal infection. It is typically transmitted to humans through the bite of Anopheles mosquitoes and less frequently can be contracted through blood transfusions, sharing contaminated needles and syringes, mother-to-child transmission, or after solid organ transplantation. Posttransplant malaria has rarely been reported in the literature, even in endemic areas. We report the cases of three solid organ recipients in which Plasmodium vivax infection was documented during postsurgical evaluation 30 days after transplant surgery. The diagnosis of donor-derived malaria was confirmed in all patients by demonstrating Plasmodium in a peripheral blood smear and by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). All recipients had symptoms. The liver transplant recipient had myalgia, arthralgia, and thrombocytopenia; the kidney transplant recipient developed acute renal failure; and the heart transplant recipient had fever, cephalalgia, and tonic-clonic seizures. Pre-transplant screening of donors and recipients from endemic regions may not be sufficient to safely rule out persistent malaria. In Colombia, according to legislation, no mandatory testing is required for the diagnosis of malaria in organ donors in nonendemic areas. Therefore, donor screening by questionnaire is the only tool for preventing transplant-borne malaria. The migratory trend from Venezuela to Colombia has increased the number of imported cases of malaria, and the infection may be present in endemic and nonendemic regions. Although donor evaluation is not standardized in current guidelines, we suggest that donors be tested for malaria with a peripheral blood smear, detection of specific IgG antibodies against Plasmodium, and techniques such as PCR, if possible.
Subject(s)
Malaria , Organ Transplantation , Animals , Female , Humans , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical , Organ Transplantation/adverse effects , Tissue Donors , Transplant RecipientsABSTRACT
Humoral allogeneic immunity driven by anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) significantly impede prolonged survival of organ allografts after transplantation. Although the importance of T follicular helper (TFH) cells in controlling antibody responses has been long established, their role in directing donor-specific antibody generation leading to AMR was only recently appreciated in the clinical setting of organ transplantation. In this review, we provide a comprehensive summary of the current knowledge on the biology of human TFH cells as well as their circulating counterparts and describe their pivotal role in driving humoral alloimmunity. In addition, we discuss the intrinsic effects of current induction therapies and maintenance immunosuppressive drugs as well as of biotherapies on TFH cells and provide future directions and novel opportunities of biotherapeutic targeting of TFH cells that have the potential of bringing the prophylactic and curative treatments of AMR toward personalized and precision medicine.