Panoramic evaluation of external root resorption in mandibular molars during orthodontic treatment: a comparison between root-filled and vital teeth treated with fixed appliances or clear aligners.

BACKGROUND: This investigation compared the extent of external apical root resorption (EARR) in root-filled teeth (RFT) and their contralateral vital pulp teeth (VPT) counterparts during orthodontic treatment (OT) with clear aligner (CA) treatment or fixed appliance (FA) treatment. METHODS: Sixty-six patients with similar baseline American Board of Orthodontics (ABO) discrepancy index scores were divided into two groups: 37 patients (21 females, 16 males; mean age 17.45 ± 2.67 years) in the FA group, and 29 patients (18 females, 11 males; mean age 18.33 ± 1.96 years) in the CA group. Digital panoramic radiographs captured pre- and post-OT were used to measure tooth lengths and root surface measurements in mandibular molars. EARR in both RFT and contralateral VPT was evaluated pre- and post-OT. Statistical analysis employed paired t-tests, independent t-tests, and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) (p < .05). RESULTS: All teeth exhibited varying degrees of EARR following OT. FA treatment resulted in significantly longer treatment duration (p < .05) and greater EARR compared to CA treatment (p < .05). Moreover, statistically significant differences in EARR were observed within both groups between RFT and VPT (p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Comparison of pre- and post-OT radiographs revealed different degrees of EARR in all teeth. CA treatment resulted in less frequent and less severe EARR compared to FA treatment. RFT demonstrated greater resistance to EARR than VPT in both treatment groups.

[Orthodontic treatment for malocclusions in mixed dentition].

Early orthodontic treatment is an important means of preventing and treating dentofacial deformities during the period of growth and development. In this stage, children have great potential in growth and development, high adaptability of muscles and temporomandibular joint, and good responsiveness to orthodontic force. Therefore, orthodontic intervention and treatment in this stage can prevent and guide the normal growth and development of dentition, occlusion and maxillofacial complex. This article summarizes the commonly used orthodontic techniques and appliances in the mixed dentition, including interceptive treatment of oral habits, application of functional appliances, fixed appliances, clear aligners, as well as management of severe crowding and space maintenance. This article comprehensively explains the application and indications of different orthodontic techniques in design and appliance selection in the treatment of malocclusions in the mixed dentition.

Wilson curve modification in permanent dentition: a retrospective comparison between clear aligners and continuous archwire treatment.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate leveling of the Curve of Wilson (COW) by two different treatment appliances (clear aligners [CA] and continuous archwire fixed appliances [FA]) in a permanent dentition sample of patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Digital casts of 40 patients (CA group = 20 patients; FA group = 20 patients) were collected. Angular values for COW, right and left vertical height difference of lower first molars, and linear distance between lower teeth and the WALA ridge were analyzed for pre- (T1), posttreatment (T2) and on final virtual (ClinCheck) models (T2-CC) of the CA group. An unpaired t-test was used to evaluate significant intergroup differences (P < .05), while a paired t-test was used for posttreatment CA intragroup comparison. RESULTS: FA group showed better control of second molar crown positions compared to CA group (47-WALA = -0.2 ± 0.1 mm, 37-WALA = -0.6 ± 0.3 mm). No significant difference was detected for linear distance of lower first molars and the WALA ridge or for vertical height difference. CA group showed a greater reduction of distance between lower premolars and the WALA ridge (mean difference: -0.5 mm for both 45-WALA and 35-WALA; mean difference: -0.5 mm for 44-WALA, -0.6 mm for 34-WALA). Predictability for the CA group was high for every measurement (87% Right COW, 89% Left COW, 88% 46 Vertical Diff, 87% 36 Vertical Diff). CONCLUSIONS: Clear aligner and continuous archwire mechanics were effective in leveling COW. FA was more effective in changing crown position of lower second molars with respect to the WALA ridge, while CA provided a greater distance reduction between lower premolars and WALA ridges compared to FA.

Influence of Invisalign precision bite ramp utilization on deep bite correction and root length in adults.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the influence of Invisalign precision bite ramp use on skeletal deep overbite correction and root length and volume of maxillary anterior teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 60 adults with skeletal deep overbite. Patients were divided into three groups: Invisalign (Align Technology, San Jose, Calif) with precision bite ramps (Invisalign with Bite Ramps [IBR] = 12), Invisalign with no bite ramps (INBR = 22), and full-fixed appliances (FFA = 26). Cone beam computed tomography records at T1 (pretreatment) and T2 (posttreatment) were used to measure eight skeletal, nine dental, and three soft-tissue cephalometric variables. Maxillary anterior teeth root length (mm), root volume (mm3), and percent root volume loss between T1 and T2 (%) were also recorded. RESULTS: Significant changes from T1 to T2 among the three groups were seen in ANB(o), lower face height (%), ODI (overbite depth indicator) (o), and U1-SN (o). Reduction in root length was significantly less (P < .001) in the INBR and IBR groups compared to the FFA group. Reduction in root volume and percent volume loss were significantly higher in the INBR group compared to the IBR group (P < .001), but the difference between the two Invisalign groups and the FFA group was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Skeletal deep overbite correction using Invisalign with or without bite ramps is comparable to FFA. Reduction in root length was significantly less with Invisalign compared to FFA. Bite ramps influenced root volume and volume loss but not root length.

Vertical and transverse treatment effects of Invisalign First system compared to Hyrax maxillary expanders with fixed appliances in mixed dentition patients.

OBJECTIVES: To compare vertical and transverse changes in mixed dentition patients treated with the Invisalign First System (IFS) to those treated with a banded hyrax expander with fixed appliances (Hyrax) and control groups, and to assess the efficiency rate of dental arch expansion with IFS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 80 mixed dentition patients, with 40 in each group (IFS and Hyrax) and 40 controls from the American Association of Orthodontists Foundation Craniofacial Growth Legacy Collection. Skeletal and dental vertical dimension changes and arch width changes between pretreatment (T1) and posttreatment (T2) were evaluated. RESULTS: Age at T1, time interval (T1-T2), sex, and Angle class did not significantly differ among the groups. Mandibular plane angle changes showed a similar reduction for the control and IFS groups, with no changes in the Hyrax group. However, the differences among the three groups did not reach statistical significance (P = .06). The Hyrax group showed significantly greater expansion in maxillary intermolar width compared to the IFS group, 4.4 vs 2.5 mm, respectively. The efficiency of maxillary expansion using IFS ranged from 52.3% to 76.87%. CONCLUSIONS: During the mixed dentition stage, no significant changes occurred in vertical dimensions among the control, Hyrax, and IFS groups. Although there was a trend suggesting a greater reduction in mandibular plane angle in the IFS group compared to the Hyrax group, this may not be clinically significant given the less than 1° difference. IFS can be a viable option for addressing mild arch width deficiencies, with a predictable increase in intermolar width of approximately 2.5 mm.

Shared decision making for patients needing dentofacial orthopedics, orthognathic surgery, and conventional non-surgical fixed appliance therapy: a comparison between Pakistani patients' and clinicians' perspective.

INTRODUCTION: Shared decision making (SDM) involves presenting patients with relevant information about a health issue and reaching a clinical decision based on their preferences. However, its application in orthodontics lacks documentation. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess and compare the perspectives of patients and clinicians on SDM in different cases. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan, involving 90 patients categorized into three groups (dentofacial orthopedics, orthognathic surgery, and conventional non-surgical fixed appliance treatment). Following clinical assessment and treatment plan discussions, patients and clinicians completed a 12-item dyadic observing patient involvement in decision making (OPTION) questionnaire, to gauge their perspectives on SDM. Mean OPTION scale scores were compared using paired sample t-tests between clinicians and patients, and intergroup comparisons utilized paired sample t-tests and Pearson correlation coefficients. RESULTS: OPTION scores were similar between patients/parents and clinicians. However, statistically significant differences were found regarding the questions about "different sources of information", "different options (including the possibility of doing nothing)" and "concerns regarding management", with the patients giving overall lower OPTION scores. Patients gave lower SDM OPTION scores for conventional orthodontic treatment, but higher scores for orthopedic and orthognathic surgery, as compared to the clinicians. CONCLUSIONS: The current study revealed an overall consensus in the mean total scores of OPTION scales between patients and clinicians. However, when stratified, patients showed higher SDM scores for orthopedic and orthognathic cases, and lower scores for conventional orthodontic treatment.

Nonsurgical class III correction in adolescence using modified fixed reverse twin-block therapy and fixed appliances - a case series.

Skeletal class III malocclusion is a therapeutic challenge in orthodontic practice. Reverse functional appliances such as reverse twin block (RTB) are used to correct class III skeletal and occlusal disharmonies associated with functional anterior shift in growing patients. However, treatment options become limited with increasing age, especially when patients desire nonsurgical and nonextraction camouflage treatment. This report illustrates the successful nonsurgical treatment of class III malocclusion during adolescence and adulthood, exacerbated by a functional anterior shift that resulted in overclosure of the mandible. A modified fixed RTB was utilized to posture the mandible backwards, thereby inducing active clockwise rotation of the mandible. After treatment, patients demonstrated significantly improved maxillomandibular relationships, well-maintained stable occlusion, and facial esthetics. Satisfactory occlusal, esthetic, and functional outcomes achieved in the present cases underline the fact that dentoalveolar changes induced by fixed RTB can be utilized even past a patient's peak pubertal growth period to obtain changes that aid in correcting a class III malocclusion. A synergistic combination of modified fixed RTB therapy accompanied by comprehensive fixed mechanotherapy is a viable treatment alternative for the correction of aptly selected mild to moderate skeletal class III malocclusions associated with functional anterior shift, anterior crossbites, and mandibular overclosure.

Cleansing efficacy of an oral irrigator with microburst technology in adolescent orthodontic patients. A randomized-controlled crossover study.

OBJECTIVES: Simplifying interdental space cleaning is a constantly discussed topic. The present study aimed to compare the cleansing efficacy of an oral irrigator with that of dental flossing in adolescent patients with fixed braces after four weeks of home-use. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study design is a randomized, single-blinded cross-over study. Following a twenty-eight-day period of product utilization in a home setting, a comparative analysis was conducted on hygiene indices, the Rustogi Modified Navy Plaque Index (RMNPI) and the Gingival Bleeding Index (GBI), between the test group (oral irrigator) and the control group (dental floss). RESULTS: Seventeen adolescent individuals completed the study. After 28 days of cleaning with the oral irrigator, RMNPI was 58.81% (55.31-66.47) compared to 59.46% (52.68-68.67) with dental floss (p = 0.070). Subgroup analyses did not indicate the superiority of either method. GBI after the test phase with the oral irrigator was 28.93% (23.21-33.97) and insignificantly higher compared to 26.40% (21.01-31.41) achieved with dental floss (p = 0.1585). CONCLUSIONS: Neither of the two products demonstrated statistically significant superiority in terms of cleaning efficacy. Therefore, no recommendation can be made in favor of one over the other. It was found that the high initial hygiene indices for fixed orthodontic appliances could be improved through increased awareness and precise instruction. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: For adolescent patients who struggle to use interdental brushes an oral irrigator may be suggested as a simple alternative in hard-to-reach areas, such as those around a fixed dental appliance.

The effectiveness of Bio-Min toothpaste in the management of white spot lesions: a randomised control trial.

BACKGROUND: White spot lesions (WSL) are common side effects of orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances, in which the surface layer of enamel is demineralised. Thus, remineralisation, that is a partial or complete reversal, of these lesions can occur as they affect the surface enamel. Remineralisation with low-dose fluoride, in addition to optimal oral hygiene and diet, has been recommended to manage WSL. The aim of the planned trial is to assess the effectiveness of a fluoride-containing bioactive glass toothpaste (BioMin™) in its ability to remineralise post-orthodontic demineralised WSL. METHODS: A single-centre, double-blind randomised clinical trial to assess intervention with Bio-Min toothpaste on WSL forming on the teeth of young people completing orthodontic treatment. DISCUSSION: Remineralisation of WSL can vary depending on the individual and the site of the lesion. There is a range of oral fluoride delivery methods which include toothpastes, oral rinses, and gel preparations, which can aid remineralisation of these lesions. Identifying effective methods of remineralisation to manage this common and unsightly complication of fixed appliance therapy can improve the health and aesthetics of dentition. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN.com International Standard Randomised Controlled Trials Number (ISRCTN) 14479893 . Registered on 14 May 2020.

Can vacuum-formed retainers maintain arch dimensions and alignment compared to Hawley and fixed bonded retainers after treatment with fixed appliances? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Different types of retention appliances have been proposed over the years, but their effectiveness in maintaining arch dimensions and alignment after orthodontic treatment is still unclear. AIM: To assess the efficacy of vacuum-formed retainers (VFRs) in preserving arch widths, arch length, and anterior alignment in maxillary and mandibular arches, compared to removable Hawley retainers (HRs) or fixed bonded retainers (FBRs). Search methods: unrestricted literature search of five major databases up to March 2024. SELECTION CRITERIA: randomized/non-randomized clinical studies comparing VFRs to removable HRs or FBRs. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: after duplicate study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment, random effects meta-analyses of standardized mean differences and their 95% confidence intervals were performed, followed by meta-regressions, sensitivity analyses, and assessment of the quality of evidence with GRADE. RESULTS: Twenty-two prospective studies (4 non-randomized and 18 randomized controlled trials) involving 1797 patients (mean age 17.01 years, 38.3% males) were included. No significant differences were found in the intercanine width, intermolar width, and arch length between VFRs and HRs, in both arches (P > 0.05). However, VFRs were statistically more effective than HRs in terms of Little's irregularity scores (LII) in the maxilla (eight studies; SMD = -0.42; 95% CI: -1.03 to -0.09; P = 0.02; I2 = 73.4%) but not in the mandible (P = 0.12). No significant differences were reported for all considered outcomes between VFRs and FBRs in in both arches (P > 0.05), except for lower LII, where VFRs were significantly less efficient (eight studies; SMD = 1.49; 95% CI = 0.26-2.7; P = 0.02; I2 = 93%). Follow-up times, risk of bias, and wire type (of FBRs) did not show statistically significant effects on outcome variables. Sensitivity analyses showed robustness of the findings for including non-randomized and postretention studies. The certainty in these estimates was from moderate to low due to the risk of bias and inconsistency. CONCLUSIONS: Low to moderate quality evidence indicates that VFRs are as effective as HRs in maintaining arch widths, length, and alignment. Low-quality evidence found similar efficacy between VFRs and FBRs, with FBRs being statistically more effective at maintaining lower arch alignment, but the difference was not clinically significant. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration (CRD42024518433).

Comparison of fixed braces and clear braces for malocclusion treatment.

BACKGROUND: To study and compare the effects of clear aligners without brackets and traditional fixed aligners in orthodontic treatment. METHODS: The samples were collected from January 2022 to April 2023. The control group (n = 26) received orthodontic treatment using traditional fixed appliances. The research group (n = 20) received orthodontic treatment using the clear aligners without brackets. Compare the therapeutic effects and related evaluation indicators between two groups. RESULTS: The total effective ratio was compared between the 2 groups, and the study group was greater(P < 0.05). After treatment, the detected values of the periodontal condition indicators (plaque index, debris index, and gingival bleeding index), serum inflammatory factors (CRP, IL-6 and TNF-α) of the two groups, were less than before, also were all less than the control group. (P < 0.05). After therapy, in comparison of the control group, the value of mastication efficiency, comfort and psychological evaluation, sleep indicators and the points of the four dimensions of life quality in the study group was greater, and the detection results were obviously greater than before(P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In the orthodontic therapy of sufferers with malocclusion, compared with the traditional fixed appliance, the clear aligners without brackets can enhance the treatment effects, improve the periodontal condition and masticatory function, and reduce the inflammatory responses, so that patients can feel more comfortable, thereby improving their psychology, sleep and quality of life. In the future, with the continual advancement of technology and people's pursuit of beauty, the application of clear aligners without brackets in orthodontic treatment will become more and more extensive. The continuous introduction of new materials and new technologies will further improve the effects and comfort of the clear aligners without brackets, reduce treatment time and discomfort, and also reduce patients' resistance to aligners, bringing patients a better treatment experience.

Does the oral microbiota evolve differently during orthodontic treatment with vestibular multi-attachment fixed appliances versus aligners? A systematic review of the literature / Est-ce que le microbiote oral évolue différemment lors d'un traitement orthodontique par appareil fixe multi-attache vestibulaire versus par aligneurs ? Une revue systématique de la littérature.

Introduction: Oral microbiota of patients is impacted during orthodontic treatment. The objective of this systematic review was to observe the evolution of oral microbiota (primary objective) and periodontal health (secondary objective) during orthodontic treatment, and to compare these changes during treatment with vestibular fixed appliances and aligners. Materials and Methods: In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, an electronic search was performed in four databases until January 2022, completed by a manual search, including all prospective controlled studies, randomized or not, on the subject. Two independent authors were involved in the selection of studies, and a third author was consulted in case of disagreement. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool and ROBINS-I tool was used to assess the risk-of-bias in randomized and non-randomized trials, respectively. Finally, the risk of bias graphs were made with the robvis visualization tool. Results: Out of the 994 results obtained from these searches, 11 eligible articles were included (4 randomized clinical trials and 7 non-randomized controlled studies) with varying levels of bias. Results suggested that patients treated with aligner appliances have more favorable microbial flora and less biofilm mass during their treatment compared with those treated with fixed appliances. In addition, inflammatory marker cytokines and periodontal indices were higher in fixed orthodontic treatment compared to aligners treatment. Conclusion: Considering the limitations of this systematic review of the literature, the results suggested that aligners have a more favorable impact on the oral microbiota and periodontium compared to vestibular fixed appliances. PROSPERO registration: CRD42022276486.

Introduction: Il est désormais reconnu que le microbiote oral des patients est impacté au cours du traitement orthodontique. L'objectif de cette revue systématique était d'observer l'évolution du microbiote oral (objectif principal) et de la santé parodontale (objectif secondaire) lors du traitement orthodontique, et de comparer ces modifications lors du traitement par appareils multi-attaches vestibulaires et par aligneurs. Matériels et méthodes: Conformément aux directives PRISMA, une recherche électronique a été réalisée dans quatre bases de données jusqu'à janvier 2022, complétée par une recherche manuelle, incluant toutes les études prospectives contrôlées, randomisées ou non, sur le sujet. Deux auteurs indépendants ont été impliqués dans la sélection des études et un troisième auteur a été sollicité en cas de désaccord. L'outil The Cochrane Collaboration's tool et l'outil ROBINS-I ont été utilisés pour évaluer le risque de biais dans les essais randomisés et non randomisés, respectivement. Finalement, les graphiques des risques de biais ont été réalisés avec l'outil robvis. Résultats: Parmi les 994 résultats issus de ces recherches, onze articles éligibles ont été inclus, comprenant quatre essais cliniques randomisés et sept études contrôlées non randomisées, avec des niveaux de biais variables. Les résultats suggèrent que les patients traités par gouttières orthodontiques présentent une flore microbienne plus favorable, ainsi qu'une masse de biofilm moins élevée au cours du traitement par rapport à ceux traités par appareils fixes multi-attaches. De plus, les cytokines marqueuses d'inflammation et les indices parodontaux étaient plus importants lors des traitements orthodontiques par appareils multi-attaches. Conclusion: Tenant compte des limites associées à cette revue systématique de la littérature, les résultats semblent suggérer que les aligneurs ont un impact plus favorable sur le microbiote oral et sur le parodonte que les appareils fixes multi-attaches. Enregistrement PROSPERO : CRD42022276486.

In mild to moderate crowded cases, is there a difference in orthodontic treatment duration between clear aligners and fixed appliances?

DATA SOURCES: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Trip, CINAHL via EBSCO, EMBASE via OVID and ProQuest searched up to June 2023. Any clinical study with parallel arms and matched malocclusion severity should include permanent dentition participants with mild to mild-to-moderate anterior crowding. Participants should have undergone orthodontic treatment with either orthodontic labial fixed appliances or removable clear aligners. Total treatment time (primary outcome), chair time, number of appointments, and emergency visits (secondary outcomes) should also be reported. STUDY SELECTION: Two reviewers selected the studies to be considered in two stages. If needed, a third reviewer was included to solve discrepancies. Endnote and Rayyan software supported the process. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: The same two reviewers independently extracted the required data from the included studies. If needed, a third reviewer was included to solve discrepancies. Endnote and Rayyan software supported the process. RESULTS: Ten studies were finally included (six RCTs and four non-RCTs). Only one included samples in which teeth were extracted due to crowding. The total included sample was 718 participants (aged 20-29 years). Only one study did not report crowding equivalency between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Based on low to very low certainty levels, treatment duration is likely similar, chair time and emergency visits are less frequent, and the number of appointments is increased with clear aligners.

Comparative assessment of the clinical outcomes of clear aligners compared to fixed appliance in class II malocclusion.

OBJECTIVE: This study compared clinical outcomes between aligners and fixed appliances in class II adolescent patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Records of 31 aligners and 35 fixed class II patients, aged 13.5 ± 1.6 years were compared. Class II elastics was the mechanism employed for correcting the malocclusion. DI scores were used to compare initial complexity, and the PAR index scores were used to compare the clinical outcomes. Data on demographics, treatment and finishing durations, number of visits and refinements, duration of class II correction, and changes in the IMPA were collected. RESULTS: The mean pre-, post-treatment, and overall reduction in PAR index scores between the groups were not significantly different (P > 0.05). The clear aligners group had significantly shorter treatment duration (20.0 ± 11.6 months) than the fixed group (27.4 ± 9.1 months) (P < 0.001). The number of visits for the aligners' group was significantly less (12.7 ± 6.2) than in the fixed group (17.8 ± 5.8) (P < 0.001). Duration for class II correction was significantly shorter for clear aligners (13.3 ± 10.0 months) compared to the fixed group (17.4 ± 9.0 months) (P = 0.026). A smaller post-treatment change in IMPA (2 ± 6°) was detected in the aligners group compared to the fixed group (5 ± 6°) (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment outcomes for aligners in class II adolescent patients were comparable to those achieved in fixed appliances. Shorter treatment and class II correction durations, fewer visits, and better control for the IMPA were noticed in the aligners' group. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Treating class II adolescent patients with aligners seems promising and demands shorter treatment time and fewer visits.

The Impact of Non-Extraction Orthodontic Treatment on the Oral-Health-Related Quality of Life between a Modified Aligner Appliance with Ni-Ti Springs and the Traditional Fixed Appliances: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Background and Objectives: To compare the oral-health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) outcomes between patients treated with modified Ni-Ti spring-based alignment appliances or conventional fixed appliances using the Oral Health Impact Profile 14 (OHIP-14), as well as the levels of satisfaction with the appliance appearance, treatment progress, and outcomes. Materials and Methods: Thirty-six patients (11 males, 25 females) were randomly divided into two groups: either the modified aligner appliance with Ni-Ti springs group (MAA) or the traditional fixed appliances group (FA). The allocation ratio was 1:1, and the randomization process was carried out by an independent investigator not involved in this study. Mild crowding cases were included in this study. The OHRQoL of patients was evaluated using the short-form Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) at five time points: before the treatment commencement (T0); 2 weeks (T1), 1 month (T2), and 2 months (T3) after the treatment initiation; and post-treatment (T4). The visual analog scale (VAS) was used to evaluate the patient satisfaction. Blinding was performed only during the outcomes assessment. Results: This randomized controlled trial had no dropouts, and the demographic characteristics of the groups were comparable. The MAA group experienced significantly greater functional limitations compared with the FA group at all three evaluation time points (T1, T2, and T3), as evidenced by the statistically significant p-values (p = 0.004, p = 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively). The psychological disability in the MAA group was significantly lower than in the FA group at both T2 (p = 0.005) and T3 (p = 0.003). The patient satisfaction with the appliance appearance was significantly higher in the MAA group than in the FA group (p = 0.002). Conclusions: The OHRQoL improved in both the modified aligner appliance with Ni-Ti springs and fixed appliance groups after the treatment. Moreover, the functional limitations during the treatment were less severe in the FA group, while the psychological disability was lower, and the patient satisfaction with the appliance appearance was higher in the MAA group.

Changes in the arch width and buccal corridor after fixed orthodontic treatment with Damon self-ligating system: premolar extraction vs. non-extraction.

INTRODUCTION: Extraction vs. non-extraction is a crucial decision in orthodontic therapy. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to investigate the changes in the dental arch width and buccal corridor after orthodontic treatment using extraction and non-extraction therapy with Damon self-ligating system. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective study consisted of 35 patients (20 female and 15 male patients with median age of 12.5 years), treated by extracting 4 or 2 premolars, and 37 patients (16 female and 21 male patients with the median age of 12.8 years), treated without premolar extraction. Both groups were treated with Damon self-ligating system. Plaster models before (T0) and after (T1) treatment were measured, and the arch width values were determined at the level of the first molars, second premolars, canines and palatal rugae. Buccal corridor width was measured using the extraoral images at T0 and T1. Paired t-test was used for the analysis of the normally distributed data, and Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney U test was used for the data with non-normal distribution. Values of p<0.05 were set as statistically significant. RESULTS: The upper intercanine width increased significantly in both groups (p<0.01). In the non-extraction group, the arch width increased significantly in the maxillary second premolar and first molar region (p<0.01) as well as in the region of the canines (p=0.04), second premolars (p=0.01) and first molars (p<0.01) of the mandible. The buccal corridor decreased significantly in the non-extraction group (p<0.01). CONCLUSION: Premolar extraction in combination with Damon self-ligating system did not lead to reduction of the dental arch width in the maxilla, nor did it increase the size of the buccal corridors.

Does orthodontic treatment using fixed appliances cause initial caries lesions?

DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs), non-randomized studies of intervention (NRSIs), cohort and cross-sectional studies. The systematic review was registered in advance on PROSPERO, and was conducted following the Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Reviews of Interventions and PRISMA checklist. DATA SOURCES: An electronic search in three databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Embase) was conducted by two authors to evaluate studies published from 1990 until May 2023. STUDY SELECTION: The review question was defined in PICOS format as follows: Population (P), subjects with permanent dentition who having/had orthodontic therapy; Exposure (E), orthodontic therapy with fixed orthodontic appliance; Comparison/Control (C), no orthodontic treatment or intervention; Outcome (O), assessing incidence and/or prevalence of initial caries lesions (ICLs) at subject and teeth levels was the primary outcome, whereas evaluating the influence of demographics and treatment-related variables were secondary outcomes; studies (S), randomized clinical trials, non-randomized clinical studies, cohort and cross-sectional studies. DATA ANALYSIS: Meta-analysis was conducted of three or more included studies had comparable findings. The following factors were calculated for each study; sample size, number of patients with ICLs, number of teeth with ICLs, number of teeth affected per patient, and number of surfaces affected. Statistical heterogeneity of effects among studies was assessed by means of the Cochran's test was used to evaluate the statistical heterogeneity of effects in the included studies. Funnel plot approach was used to assess publication bias, whereas Begg's and Egger's correlation test were used to identify asymmetry. Meta-analysis was conducted using a random effects model owing to high methodological and clinical heterogeneity. A descriptive analysis was presented when the meta-analyses appeared inappropriate. Statistical significance level was set at p < 0.05 for all statistical analyses. RESULTS: 21 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis (systematic review); 11 RCTs; 7 NRSIs, and 3 observation studies. Of the included studies, 19 studies were analyzed in the quantitative synthesis (meta-analysis). In regard to the prevalence rate of ICLs; 57% of patients had ICLs, with a mean of 2.24 lesions per patient and 22% of surfaces were affected. In regard to the incidence rate; 48% of patients developed new ICLs, with a mean of 2.29 new lesions per patient, and 15% of surfaces became affected. Both prevalence and incidence rates were positively associated with the duration of the orthodontic therapy (P = 0.01 and P < 0.01, respectively), illustrating an elevation in the ICLs numbers as the treatment duration (number of months) increases. There was no association between patients' age and ICLs numbers. CONCLUSIONS: Orthodontic therapy using fixed appliances can increase the risk of accumulating plaque and developing caries lesion. However, other risk factors may play a role in developing ICLs; thus, controlling for these factors is paramount to better evaluate the true influence of orthodontic therapy on the ICLs development. Implementing caries preventive measures during orthodontic treatment may be needed to minimize the potential risks.

Caries and white spot lesion trajectories of orthodontic patients across an observation period of 20 years.

OBJECTIVES: Fixed orthodontic appliances may increase the risk for caries and white spot lesions. The aim of this retrospective study was to determine the long-term associations between both in orthodontic patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 103 patients aged 36.6 ± 6.5 years whose fixed appliance orthodontic treatment had finished at least 15 years ago were included. Current clinical data and photographs (T3), panoramic x-ray and photographs from before treatment (T0), after debonding (T1) and at 2-year follow-up (T2) were available. Parameters of interest were dentine caries, "Missing/Filled Teeth" (MFT), "White Spot Lesion" (WSL) index and "Periodontal Screening and Recording" index (PSR; T3 only). RESULTS: At T0, 30.4% had no caries experience decreasing to 25.6%, 22.4% and 6.8% at T1, T2 and T3 resp. The median MFT (95% CI) at T0, T1, T2 and T3 was 2 (1;3), 3 (2;4), 3 (2;4) and 7 (6;9) resp. increasing significantly at each time point (p < 0.001 each); 30.1% had WSL at debonding. Patients with caries experience at T0 had a 2.4-fold increased risk of WSL at debonding. Dentine caries, caries experience and WSL at T1 were significantly associated with incident caries at T2, but not at T3. PSR at T3 had a significant association with previous caries incidence and WSL. CONCLUSIONS: Caries experience prior to orthodontic treatment may constitute a risk indicator for WSL, and caries experience and WSL at its end for caries incidence in the near term. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Present caries and WSL may help identifying orthodontic patients with special need for prevention and counselling.