Assessing Healthcare Equity in Orthopaedic Surgery: An Analysis of Over 24,000 Surgical Cases.

INTRODUCTION: Health disparities have been widely studied in the primary care and surgical settings. The purpose of this study was to examine surgical access disparities for orthopaedic surgical cases performed at a large academic health center by comparing the relationship between patient demographic factors and surgical wait time. METHODS: A total of 24,778 orthopaedic surgical cases from 2018 to 2022 at a public, tertiary care, Level I trauma center were retrospectively analyzed to assess for surgical timing disparities based on patient-specific factors, including race, sex, language, and socioeconomic status. RESULTS: Elective surgical cases were completed with an average surgical wait time of 28.11 ± 26.34 days. Urgent surgical cases were completed with an average surgical wait time of 1.23 ± 1.50 days. Patient race, sex, language, and socioeconomic status had no effect on surgical wait time for urgent case scheduling. Female patients had longer average wait times in elective cases, whereas race had a weak association with increased wait time. Two-factor interaction analysis showed no multifactorial effects of patient demographic factors on surgical wait time. Patient race and socioeconomic status were associated with increased distance from surgical sites, although increased distance did not correlate with increased surgical wait time. CONCLUSION: Patient demographic factors did not demonstrate clinically notable associations with surgical timing in this patient cohort, in contrast to previous studies demonstrating the effects of race and socioeconomic status on healthcare outcomes and access. Race and socioeconomic status did correlate with increased distance from surgical centers although distance from surgical sites did not correlate with surgical wait time. This contributes to previous literature on healthcare equity and indicates that surgical wait time may not contribute to the known healthcare inequalities seen in minority and marginalized patients.

CASEMIX study: Assessment of patient factors influencing the subprocedure duration of trauma/orthopaedic surgeries.

INTRODUCTION: The social and financial burdens of the operative environment remains to be a major problem in modern society. We analyse the impact of the introduction and application of a perioperative cloud system that cross-analyzes the pre-/intraoperative risks to minimize surgical time and maximize operation theater efficiency through improved planning. METHODS: TCC-CASEMIX© was introduced to our Department of Trauma Surgery of the University of Szeged to objectively measure intraoperative time durations according to each essential subprocedure. The study is largely divided into pre-operative assessments and intraoperative measurements. Patient data (age, sex, and ethnicity etc.) was registered preoperatively, and the expected time per each essential intraoperative step (skin incision, reduction, fixation etc.) was entered. The steps were then timed intraoperatively by surveyors, and postoperative cross analysis was performed. Our study was divided into two phases; phase 1, the surveying of general trauma / orthopedic cases, and phase two; the examination of high volume surgeries. RESULTS: Acute cases of Open Reductions and Internal Fixation (ORIF) procedures depended heavily on the presentation of the fracture, and no clear correlations in the risk factors were found. Arthroscopies were a short, high-volume procedure, but there was a large difference between the surgeon's estimates and the operation duration. In high volume surgeries, although individual factors only slightly influenced surgical duration, patient cohort stratification led to a better understanding of factors that impact surgeries, namely the combination of BMI and surgeon years of experience. While the average (Intraoperative Duration) seemed to increase with BMI, younger surgeons were more influenced by the patients BMI. CONCLUSION: A data filtering algorithm-assisted cloud system can be a reliable way to facilitate the planning of operating theater schedules. Patient stratification according to BMI and surgeon years of experience seems to affect intraoperative duration significantly, and the understanding of the risks and intraoperative steps has the potential to forecast surgeries with high precision.

[Application of ultrasonic bone scalpel system for laminectomy and posterior longitudinal ligament ossification block release combined with dekyphosis orthopedic surgery in treatment of multisegmental thoracic ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament].

Objective: To explore the safety and effectiveness of multisegmental thoracic ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament (T-OPLL) treated by laminectomy, posterior longitudinal ligament ossification block release combined with dekyphosis orthopedic surgery using ultrasonic bone scalpel system. Methods: The clinical data of 8 patients with multisegmental T-OPLL treated with laminectomy, posterior longitudinal ligament ossification block release combined with dekyphosis orthopedic surgery using ultrasonic bone scalpel system between January 2020 and April 2023 was retrospectively analyzed. There were 3 males and 5 females; the age ranged from 41 to 67 years, with a mean of 57.1 years. The disease duration ranged from 3 to 74 months, with a mean of 33.4 months. Symptoms were progressive numbness and weakness of both lower limbs, unsteady walking, chest and back pain in 3 cases, and urinary and bowel dysfunction in 5 cases; 7 cases showed increased muscle strength of the lower limbs, hyperreflexia of the tendons, and a positive Babinski sign, and 1 case showed decreased muscle strength of the lower limbs, decreased skin sensation, decreased knee and Achilles tendon reflexes, and a negative pathologic sign. Multisegmental posterior longitudinal ligament ossification of thoracic spine was found in 8 cases, with 4-8 segments of ossification, and in 5 cases with multisegmental ossification of the ligamentum flavum. The preoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) thoracic spinal function score was 4.3±0.9, the visual analogue scale (VAS) score was 6.9±1.0, and the the kyphotic Cobb angle of the stenosis segment was (34.62±10.76)°. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and complications were recorded. VAS score was used to evaluate the back pain, JOA score was used to evaluate the thoracic spinal cord function and the JOA improvement rate was calculated, and the kyphotic Cobb angle of the stenosis segment was measured and the Cobb angle improvement rate was calculated. Results: The operation time ranged from 210 to 340 minutes, with a mean of 271.62 minutes; intraoperative blood loss ranged from 900 to 2 100 mL, with a mean of 1 458.75 mL; the number of resected vertebral plates ranged from 4 to 8, with a mean of 6.1; dural tears and cerebrospinal fluid leakage occurred in 3 cases, and the incisions healed by first intention. All 8 cases were followed up 12-26 months, with a mean of 18.3 months. There was no complication such as loosening of internal fixator, breakage of screws and rods, and no significant progress of ossification. At last follow-up, the VAS score was 1.4±0.7, the JOA thoracic spinal function score was 9.8±0.7, and the the kyphotic Cobb angle of the stenosis segment was (22.12±8.28)°, all of which significantly improved when compared with preoperative ones ( t=11.887, P<0.001; t=13.015, P<0.001; t=7.395, P<0.001). The JOA improvement rate was 81.06%±10.93%, of which 5 cases were rated as excellent and 3 cases as good; the Cobb angle improvement rate was 36.51%±14.20%. Conclusion: Laminectomy, posterior longitudinal ligament ossification block release combined with dekyphosis orthopedic surgery using ultrasonic bone scalpel system is a safe, effective, and simple method for the treatment of multisegmental T-OPLL, which is a feasible option.

Occupational exposure protection and perioperative management of sudden infectious diseases from the perspective of COVID-19.

The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) SARS-CoV-2 virus epidemic continues to exhibit a sporadic onset trend due to the continuous variation of the novel coronavirus. However, the psychological impact of the pandemic persists. It is crucial to reflect on our experiences to better prepare for future large-scale infectious diseases. During outbreaks of infectious diseases, patients may still require orthopaedic surgery. It is crucial to prioritize the safety of medical staff and establish procedures to ensure their protection. However, with the implementation of a series of standardized operational protection procedures, orthopaedic surgeons can safely perform their duties without the risk of contracting COVID-19. There is no doubt that the orthopaedic occupational exposure protection process and perioperative management plan for global infectious diseases, such as COVID-19, require a standardized summarization process and a narrative review.

Regional variation in low-value musculoskeletal surgery: a nationwide study from the Finnish Care Register.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:  Healthcare systems globally are grappling with resource constraints and rising costs. Concerns have been raised about "low-value" care, which consumes healthcare resources without benefiting patients. We aimed to examine regional differences in common low-value musculoskeletal surgeries in Finland and explore explanatory factors behind the variation. METHODS:  Using data from the Finnish Care Register for Health Care, surgeries conducted from 2006-2007 compared with 2020-2021 were analyzed across 20 hospital districts. Selected surgeries (acromioplasty, rotator cuff repair, partial meniscectomy, wrist arthroscopy, ankle arthroscopy, and distal radius fracture fixation) were categorized based on NOMESCO procedure codes, and incidence rates in older populations were calculated based on population size derived from Statistics Finland. RESULTS:  We found substantial regional disparities in low-value surgeries. The incidence rates were higher in hospitals with high historical incidence rates and smaller population sizes, suggesting that the uptake of evidence is slower in small non-academic hospitals. CONCLUSION:  The incidence of low-value surgery is declining but regional differences remain large. It is unlikely that regional variation in disease incidence explains such large variation in low-value surgery. Instead, local treatment culture seems to be the driving force behind low-value surgery, and the practices seem to be more entrenched in small hospitals.

Systems issues limiting acute fracture care delivery at a tertiary care hospital in Northern Tanzania.

Introduction: sub-Saharan Africa experiences a significant musculoskeletal trauma burden. Among patients who receive surgical treatment, there have been no reports as to how often surgical care is determined to be "adequate" or, if "inadequate", then what hospital and orthopaedic specialty-specific systems limitations might be prohibitive. Methods: data from patients presenting to the orthopaedic trauma service at a tertiary care center in sub-Saharan Africa were prospectively collected over a 6-week period and then retrospectively reviewed to determine whether the surgical treatment was "adequate" (or otherwise, "inadequate") according to the principle of restoring length, alignment, and rotation. Exclusion criteria included insufficient clinical information; isolated spinal injury; infection; cases involving only removal of hardware; soft-tissue procedures; tumor cases; and medical (non-surgical) conditions. Results: 112 cases were included for analysis. Surgery was indicated in 106 of 112 cases (94.6%), and of those, surgery was performed in 62 cases (58.4%). Among patients who underwent surgery with available post-operative imaging (n=56), surgical treatment was "inadequate" in 24 cases (42.9%). The most common reasons treatment was deemed "inadequate" included unavailability of appropriate implants (n=16), unavailability of intraoperative fluoroscopy (n=10) and incomplete intraoperative evaluation of injury (n=5). Conclusion: several systems limitations prevent the delivery of adequate surgical treatment in patients with acute orthopaedic traumatic injuries, including lack of intraoperative fluoroscopy and lack of implant availability. This study will serve as a useful baseline for ongoing efforts seeking to improve orthopaedic specialty resource availability and facilitate more effective fracture care in this region.

Value Defects in Spine Surgery: How to Reduce Wasteful Care and Improve Value.

Technological innovation has advanced the efficacy of spine surgery for patients; however, these advances do not consistently translate into clinical effectiveness. Some patients who undergo spine surgery experience continued chronic back pain and other complications that were not present before the procedure. Defects in healthcare value, such as the lack of clinical benefit from spine surgery, are, unfortunately, common, and the US healthcare system spends $1.4 trillion annually on value defects. In this article, we examine how avoidable complications, postacute healthcare use, revision surgeries, and readmissions among spine surgery patients contribute to $67 million of wasteful spending on value defects. Furthermore, we estimate that almost $27 million of these costs could be recuperated simply by redirecting patients to facilities referred to as centers of excellence. In total, quality improvement efforts are costly to implement but may only cost about $36 million to fully correct the $67 million in finances misappropriated to value defects. The objectives of this article are to present an approach to eliminate defects in spine surgery, including a center-of-excellence framework for eliminating defects specific to this group of procedures.

Prolonged operative time significantly impacts on the incidence of complications in spinal surgery.

BACKGROUND: In spinal surgery adverse events (AE) and surgical complications (SC) significantly affect patient's outcome and quality of life. The duration of surgery has been investigated in different surgical field as risk factor for complications. The aim of this study is to analyze the correlation between operative time and adverse events in spinal surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data collected prospectively in a cohort of 336 patients surgically treated for spinal diseases of oncological and degenerative origin in a single center, between January 2017 to January 2018. Demographics and clinical data were collected. Adverse events were classified using Spinal Adverse Events Severity System version 2 (SAVES-V2) capture system. Focusing on degenerative patients, bivariate analysis and univariate logistic regression were used to determine the association between operative time and complications. RESULTS: A total of 105/336 patients experienced an AE related to surgery, respectively 38% in the oncological group and 28% in the degenerative group. The average age at surgery was 60.3 years (SD 17.1) and the mean operative time was 164.8 ± 138 min. A total of 206 adverse events (30 intraoperative, 135 early postoperative and 41 late postoperative AEs) were recorded. Early post-operative complications accounted for the most recorded AEs (55.5% in the oncological group and 73.2% in the degenerative group). Univariate logistic regression analyses confirmed that operative time correlated with increased risk of intra-operative (p-value = 0.0008), early post-operative (p-value < 0.001) and late post-operative (p-value < 0.001) adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the strong correlation between the occurrence of adverse events in spinal surgery and prolonged operative time and suggests that efforts should be made to minimize the duration of surgical procedures while prioritizing patient's safety, without compromising the technical achievement of the procedure.

Hybrid-3D robotic suite in spine and trauma surgery - experiences in 210 patients.

BACKGROUND: In modern Hybrid ORs, the synergies of navigation and robotics are assumed to contribute to the optimisation of the treatment in trauma, orthopaedic and spine surgery. Despite promising evidence in the area of navigation and robotics, previous publications have not definitively proven the potential benefits. Therefore, the aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the potential benefit and clinical outcome of patients treated in a fully equipped 3D-Navigation Hybrid OR. METHODS: Prospective data was collected (March 2022- March 2024) after implementation of a fully equipped 3D-Navigation Hybrid OR ("Robotic Suite") in the authors level 1 trauma centre. The OR includes a navigation unit, a cone beam CT (CBCT), a robotic arm and mixed reality glasses. Surgeries with different indications of the spine, the pelvis (pelvic ring and acetabulum) and the extremities were performed. Spinal and non-spinal screws were inserted. The collected data was analysed retrospectively. Pedicle screw accuracy was graded according to the Gertzbein and Robbins (GR) classification. RESULTS: A total of n = 210 patients (118 m:92f) were treated in our 3D-Navigation Hybrid OR, with 1171 screws inserted. Among these patients, 23 patients (11.0%) arrived at the hospital via the trauma room with an average Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 25.7. There were 1035 (88.4%) spinal screws inserted at an accuracy rate of 98.7% (CI95%: 98.1-99.4%; 911 GR-A & 111 GR-B screws). The number of non-spinal screws were 136 (11.6%) with an accuracy rate of 99.3% (CI95%: 97.8-100.0%; 135 correctly placed screws). This resulted in an overall accuracy rate of 98.8% (CI95%: 98.2-99.4%). The robotic arm was used in 152 cases (72.4%), minimally invasive surgery (MIS) was performed in 139 cases (66.2%) and wound infection occurred in 4 cases (1,9%). Overall, no revisions were needed. CONCLUSION: By extending the scope of application, this study showed that interventions in a fully equipped 3D-Navigation Hybrid OR can be successfully performed not only on the spine, but also on the pelvis and extremities. In trauma, orthopaedics and spinal surgery, navigation and robotics can be used to perform operations with a high degree of precision, increased safety, reduced radiation exposure for the OR-team and a very low complication rate.

The Latarjet Procedure for Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability in the Contact Athlete.

In young athletes, anterior shoulder instability is a prevalent condition. Because of high-energy traumas, contact athletes often suffer recurrent instability, bone loss and postoperative recurrences. Patients younger than 20 years, symptomatic for more than 6 months, with ≥ 2 dislocations, with off-track Hill-Sachs lesion, glenoid bone loss, ALPSA lesion, Instability Severity Index Score > 3, and Glenoid Track Instability Management Score > 3 are at higher risk of failure. In cases of multiple dislocations with critical or subcritical glenoid bone loss, notably in collision and contact athletes, the Latarjet procedure is widely recognized as the treatment of choice.

Low Rate of AVN and Complications in Unstable SCFE With Epiphyseal-metaphyseal Discontinuity After Treatment With a Modified Dunn Procedure.

BACKGROUND: The risk of developing avascular necrosis (AVN) in the setting of an unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) that is undergoing treatment with the modified Dunn procedure is not well understood. In addition, since the Loder classification of unstable is reportedly different than actual intraoperatively observed instability (that is, discontinuity between the femoral head epiphysis and proximal femoral metaphysis), the overall risk of developing AVN, as well as the potential complications of treatment of these patients with the modified Dunn procedure, are unknown. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: To evaluate the modified Dunn procedure for the treatment of patients with epiphyseal-metaphyseal discontinuity, we asked: (1) What was the survivorship free from AVN at 10 years? (2) What was the survivorship free from subsequent surgery and/or complications at 10 years? (3) What were the clinical and patient-reported outcome scores? METHODS: In a retrospective analysis, we identified 159 patients (159 hips) treated with a modified Dunn procedure for SCFE between 1998 and 2020, of whom 97% (155 of 159) had documentation about intraoperatively observed epiphyseal-metaphyseal stability. Of those, 37% (58 of 155) of patients were documented to have intraoperatively observed epiphyseal-metaphyseal discontinuity and were considered eligible for inclusion, whereas 63% (97 of 155) had documented epiphyseal-metaphyseal stability and were excluded. No patients were lost to follow-up before the 2-year minimum. All patients were assessed for survival, but 7% (4 of 58) did not fill out our outcomes score questionnaire. This resulted in 93% (54 of 58) of patients who were available for outcome score assessment. Additionally, 50% (29 of 58) of patients had not been seen within the last 5 years; they are included, but we note that there is uncertainty about their status. The median (range) age at surgery was 13 years (10 to 16), and the sex ratio was 60% (35 of 58) male and 40% (23 of 58) female patients. Sixty-four percent (37 of 58) of patients were classified as acute-on-chronic, and 17% (10 of 58) of patients were classified as acute. Forty-seven percent (27 of 58) of patients presented with severe slips and 43% (25 of 58) of patients with moderate slips based on radiographic classification. All patients underwent surgical hip dislocation with the modified Dunn procedure to correct the slip deformity and provide stabilization. Complications and reoperations were assessed from a review of electronic medical records, and a Kaplan-Meier estimator was used to estimate survivorship free from complications and reoperations at 10 years. Clinical examination results and questionnaire responses were evaluated at minimum 2-year follow-up. RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier survivorship free from AVN was 93% (95% CI 87% to 100%) at 10 years. Survivorship free from any reoperation was 75% (95% CI 64% to 88%) at 10 years. In addition, survivorship free from complications, defined as development of AVN, reoperation, or a Sink Grade II complication or higher, was 57% (95% CI 45% to 73%) at 10 years. The median (range) Merle D'Aubigne Postel score was 18 (14 to 18) for the patients who did not develop AVN, and 12 (6 to 16) for the four patients who developed AVN (p < 0.001). The median modified Harris hip score was 100 (74 to 100) in the non-AVN cohort and 65 (37 to 82) in the AVN cohort (p = 0.001). Median HOOS total score was 95 (50 to 100) in the non-AVN cohort and 53 (40 to 82) in the AVN cohort (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Although the modified Dunn procedure is technically challenging, this study shows that in experienced hands, patients with who have demonstrated epiphyseal-metaphyseal discontinuity can be treated with a low risk of AVN and subsequent surgery. Referral of these patients to specialists who have substantial expertise in this procedure is recommended to improve patient outcomes. Prospective, long-term observational studies will help us identify these high-risk patients preoperatively and determine the long-term success of this procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study.

Effect of negative pressure wound therapy on the incidence of deep surgical site infections after orthopedic surgery: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis aimed to explore the impact of prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) on the occurrence of deep surgical site infections (SSIs) following orthopedic surgery. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted across Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases for articles concerning NPWT in patients who underwent orthopedic surgery up to May 20, 2024. Using Stata 15.0, the combined odds ratios (ORs) were calculated with either a random-effects model or a fixed-effects model, depending on the heterogeneity values. RESULTS: From a total of 440 publications, studies that utilized NPWT as the experimental group and conventional dressings as the control group were selected to analyze their impact on SSIs. Ultimately, 32 studies met the inclusion criteria. These included 12 randomized controlled trials and 20 cohort studies, involving 7454 patients, with 3533 of whom received NPWT and 3921 of whom were treated with conventional dressings. The results of the meta-analysis demonstrated that the NPWT group had a lower incidence of deep SSIs in orthopedic surgeries than did the control group [OR 0.64, 95% CI (0.52, 0.80), P = 0.0001]. Subgroup analysis indicated a notable difference for trauma surgeries [OR 0.65, 95% CI (0.50, 0.83), P = 0.001], whereas joint surgeries [OR 0.65, 95% CI (0.38, 1.12), P = 0.122] and spine surgeries [OR 0.61, 95% CI (0.27, 1.35), P = 0.221] did not show significant differences. Additionally, when examined separately according to heterogeneity, trauma surgeries exhibited a significant difference [OR 0.50, 95% CI (0.31, 0.80), P = 0.004]. CONCLUSION: The results of our study indicate that the prophylactic use of NPWT reduces the incidence of deep SSIs following orthopedic trauma surgery when compared to the use of conventional dressings. We postulate that the prophylactic application of NPWT in patients at high risk of developing complications from bone trauma may result in improved clinical outcomes and an enhanced patient prognosis.

Utility of Machine Learning, Natural Language Processing, and Artificial Intelligence in Predicting Hospital Readmissions After Orthopaedic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Numerous applications and strategies have been utilized to help assess the trends and patterns of readmissions after orthopaedic surgery in an attempt to extrapolate possible risk factors and causative agents. The aim of this work is to systematically summarize the available literature on the extent to which natural language processing, machine learning, and artificial intelligence (AI) can help improve the predictability of hospital readmissions after orthopaedic and spine surgeries. METHODS: This is a systematic review and meta-analysis. PubMed, Embase and Google Scholar were searched, up until August 30, 2023, for studies that explore the use of AI, natural language processing, and machine learning tools for the prediction of readmission rates after orthopedic procedures. Data regarding surgery type, patient population, readmission outcomes, advanced models utilized, comparison methods, predictor sets, the inclusion of perioperative predictors, validation method, size of training and testing sample, accuracy, and receiver operating characteristics (C-statistic), among other factors, were extracted and assessed. RESULTS: A total of 26 studies were included in our final dataset. The overall summary C-statistic showed a mean of 0.71 across all models, indicating a reasonable level of predictiveness. A total of 15 articles (57%) were attributed to the spine, making it the most commonly explored orthopaedic field in our study. When comparing accuracy of prediction models between different fields, models predicting readmissions after hip/knee arthroplasty procedures had a higher prediction accuracy (mean C-statistic = 0.79) than spine (mean C-statistic = 0.7) and shoulder (mean C-statistic = 0.67). In addition, models that used single institution data, and those that included intraoperative and/or postoperative outcomes, had a higher mean C-statistic than those utilizing other data sources, and that include only preoperative predictors. According to the Prediction model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool, the majority of the articles in our study had a high risk of bias. CONCLUSION: AI tools perform reasonably well in predicting readmissions after orthopaedic procedures. Future work should focus on standardizing study methodologies and designs, and improving the data analysis process, in an attempt to produce more reliable and tangible results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Comparison of different immobilisation durations following open surgery for acute achilles tendon rupture: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: In recent decades, early rehabilitation after Achilles tendon rupture (ATR) repair has been proposed. The aim of this prospective cohort study was to compare different immobilisation durations in order to determine the optimal duration after open surgery for ATR repair. METHODS: This study included 1088 patients (mean age, 34.9 ± 5.9 years) who underwent open surgery for acute ATR repair. The patients were categorised into four groups (A, B, C, and D) according to postoperative immobilisation durations of 0, 2, 4, and 6 weeks, respectively. All patients received the same suture technique and a similar rehabilitation protocol after brace removal,; they were clinically examined at 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16 weeks postoperatively, with a final follow-up at a mean of 19.0 months. The primary outcome was the recovery time for the one-leg heel-rise height (OHRH). Secondary outcomes included the time required to return to light exercise (LE) and the recovery times for the range of motion (ROM). Data regarding the surgical duration, complications, the visual analogue scale (VAS) score for pain, the Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS), and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Scale score were also collected. RESULTS: The recovery times for OHRH, LE, and ROM were significantly shorter in groups A and B than in groups C and D (P < 0.001). The VAS scores decreased over time, reaching 0 in all groups by 10 weeks. The mean scores in groups A and B were higher than those in the other groups at 2 and 4 weeks (P < 0.001), whereas the opposite was true at 8 weeks (P < 0.001). ATRS and the AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot scale score increased across all groups over time, showing significant between-group differences from weeks 6 to 16 (P < 0.001) and weeks 6 to 12 (P < 0.001). The mean scores were better in groups A and B than in groups C and D. Thirty-eight complications (3.5%) were observed, including 20 re-ruptures and 18 superficial infections. All complications were resolved at the last follow-up, with no significant between-group differences. CONCLUSIONS: Immobilisation for 2 weeks after open surgery for ATR repair may be the optimal strategy for early rehabilitation with relatively minimal pain and other complications. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04663542).

Clinic of Hope: bridging infectious disease and orthopaedic surgery in prosthetic joint infection management.

Prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) following total joint arthroplasty are a significant and costly complication. To address fragmented care typically seen with separate management, we established a combined infectious disease and orthopaedic surgery clinic at Duke Health in July 2020. This clinic focuses on patients experiencing acute deterioration or multiple PJI episodes, often at the stage where amputation is the only option offered. From July 2021 to March 2024, the clinic completed 974 visits with 319 unique patients. The clinic maintained a low no-show rate of 5.0%. Treatment plans included procedures such as debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (38%), as well as implant explantation and one-stage exchange (32% each), with amputation required in only 4% of cases. The integrated clinic model facilitated real-time, multidisciplinary care, improving patient outcomes and operational efficiency. This approach offers a promising model for managing complex infections.

Design and performance analysis of low damage anti-skid crescent drills for bone drilling.

BACKGROUND: With orthopedic surgery increasing year on year, the main challenges in bone drilling are thermal damage, mechanical damage, and drill skid. The need for new orthopedic drills that improve the quality of surgery is becoming more and more urgent. METHODS: Here, we report the skidding mechanism of drills at a wide range of inclination angle and propose two crescent drills (CDTI and CDTII). The anti-skid performance and drilling damage of the crescent drills were analyzed for the first time. Inclined bone drilling experiments were carried out with crescent drills and twist drills and real-time drilling forces and temperatures were collected. RESULTS: The crescent drills are significantly better than the twist drill in terms of anti-skid, reducing skidding forces, thrust forces and temperature. The highest temperature is generated close to the upper surface of the workpiece rather than at the hole exit. Finally, the longer crescent edge with a small and negative polar angle increases the rake angle of the cutting edge and reduces thrust forces but increases skidding force and temperature. This study can promote the development of high-quality orthopedic surgery and the development of new bone drilling tools. CONCLUSION: The crescent drills did not skid and caused little drilling damage. In comparison, the CDTI performs better in reducing the skidding force, while the CDTII performs better in reducing the thrust force.