Low Rate of AVN and Complications in Unstable SCFE With Epiphyseal-metaphyseal Discontinuity After Treatment With a Modified Dunn Procedure.

BACKGROUND: The risk of developing avascular necrosis (AVN) in the setting of an unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) that is undergoing treatment with the modified Dunn procedure is not well understood. In addition, since the Loder classification of unstable is reportedly different than actual intraoperatively observed instability (that is, discontinuity between the femoral head epiphysis and proximal femoral metaphysis), the overall risk of developing AVN, as well as the potential complications of treatment of these patients with the modified Dunn procedure, are unknown. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: To evaluate the modified Dunn procedure for the treatment of patients with epiphyseal-metaphyseal discontinuity, we asked: (1) What was the survivorship free from AVN at 10 years? (2) What was the survivorship free from subsequent surgery and/or complications at 10 years? (3) What were the clinical and patient-reported outcome scores? METHODS: In a retrospective analysis, we identified 159 patients (159 hips) treated with a modified Dunn procedure for SCFE between 1998 and 2020, of whom 97% (155 of 159) had documentation about intraoperatively observed epiphyseal-metaphyseal stability. Of those, 37% (58 of 155) of patients were documented to have intraoperatively observed epiphyseal-metaphyseal discontinuity and were considered eligible for inclusion, whereas 63% (97 of 155) had documented epiphyseal-metaphyseal stability and were excluded. No patients were lost to follow-up before the 2-year minimum. All patients were assessed for survival, but 7% (4 of 58) did not fill out our outcomes score questionnaire. This resulted in 93% (54 of 58) of patients who were available for outcome score assessment. Additionally, 50% (29 of 58) of patients had not been seen within the last 5 years; they are included, but we note that there is uncertainty about their status. The median (range) age at surgery was 13 years (10 to 16), and the sex ratio was 60% (35 of 58) male and 40% (23 of 58) female patients. Sixty-four percent (37 of 58) of patients were classified as acute-on-chronic, and 17% (10 of 58) of patients were classified as acute. Forty-seven percent (27 of 58) of patients presented with severe slips and 43% (25 of 58) of patients with moderate slips based on radiographic classification. All patients underwent surgical hip dislocation with the modified Dunn procedure to correct the slip deformity and provide stabilization. Complications and reoperations were assessed from a review of electronic medical records, and a Kaplan-Meier estimator was used to estimate survivorship free from complications and reoperations at 10 years. Clinical examination results and questionnaire responses were evaluated at minimum 2-year follow-up. RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier survivorship free from AVN was 93% (95% CI 87% to 100%) at 10 years. Survivorship free from any reoperation was 75% (95% CI 64% to 88%) at 10 years. In addition, survivorship free from complications, defined as development of AVN, reoperation, or a Sink Grade II complication or higher, was 57% (95% CI 45% to 73%) at 10 years. The median (range) Merle D'Aubigne Postel score was 18 (14 to 18) for the patients who did not develop AVN, and 12 (6 to 16) for the four patients who developed AVN (p < 0.001). The median modified Harris hip score was 100 (74 to 100) in the non-AVN cohort and 65 (37 to 82) in the AVN cohort (p = 0.001). Median HOOS total score was 95 (50 to 100) in the non-AVN cohort and 53 (40 to 82) in the AVN cohort (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Although the modified Dunn procedure is technically challenging, this study shows that in experienced hands, patients with who have demonstrated epiphyseal-metaphyseal discontinuity can be treated with a low risk of AVN and subsequent surgery. Referral of these patients to specialists who have substantial expertise in this procedure is recommended to improve patient outcomes. Prospective, long-term observational studies will help us identify these high-risk patients preoperatively and determine the long-term success of this procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study.

Exploring the Potential of a Smart Ring to Predict Postoperative Pain Outcomes in Orthopedic Surgery Patients.

Poor pain alleviation remains a problem following orthopedic surgery, leading to prolonged recovery time, increased morbidity, and prolonged opioid use after hospitalization. Wearable device data, collected during postsurgical recovery, may help ameliorate poor pain alleviation because a patient's physiological state during the recovery process may be inferred from sensor data. In this study, we collected smart ring data from 37 inpatients following orthopedic surgery and developed machine learning models to predict if a patient had postsurgical poor pain alleviation. Machine learning models based on the smart ring data were able to predict if a patient had poor pain alleviation during their hospital stay with an accuracy of 70.0%, an F1-score of 0.769, and an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.762 on an independent test dataset. These values were similar to performance metrics from existing models that rely on static, preoperative patient factors. Our results provide preliminary evidence that wearable device data may help control pain after orthopedic surgery by incorporating real-time, objective estimates of a patient's pain during recovery.

Risk factors associated with surgical site infection following orthopaedic surgery in South Africa and Sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review protocol.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the scoping review will be to understand and describe risk factors associated with surgical site infection (SSI) in an orthopaedic surgery population in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Africa. This paper describes the protocol that will be used for the scoping review. METHOD: A comprehensive literature search will be conducted using MEDLINE (PubMed), CINAHL (EBSCO), Embase and Cochrane Libraries to identify articles meeting the inclusion criteria, including both published and grey literature, in order to provide a broad overview of the reported risk factors associated with patients who have undergone an orthopaedic surgery with an outcome of SSI within 90 days of a procedure. Additional studies will be sourced by exploring the reference list of included eligible studies. By using a combination of the Population, Exposure, Outcome framework, terms and synonyms related to each category, in different variations, along with Boolean operators (AND, OR, NOT) in the search strategy, identified comprehensive and relevant literature for the scoping review. RESULTS: It is anticipated the results will provide a baseline of risk factors that will inform the development of a risk assessment tool for clinical use. CONCLUSION: This protocol will inform the development of a scoping review to describe factors associated with SSIs following orthopaedic surgery in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Africa.

Clinic of Hope: bridging infectious disease and orthopaedic surgery in prosthetic joint infection management.

Prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) following total joint arthroplasty are a significant and costly complication. To address fragmented care typically seen with separate management, we established a combined infectious disease and orthopaedic surgery clinic at Duke Health in July 2020. This clinic focuses on patients experiencing acute deterioration or multiple PJI episodes, often at the stage where amputation is the only option offered. From July 2021 to March 2024, the clinic completed 974 visits with 319 unique patients. The clinic maintained a low no-show rate of 5.0%. Treatment plans included procedures such as debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (38%), as well as implant explantation and one-stage exchange (32% each), with amputation required in only 4% of cases. The integrated clinic model facilitated real-time, multidisciplinary care, improving patient outcomes and operational efficiency. This approach offers a promising model for managing complex infections.

Utility of Machine Learning, Natural Language Processing, and Artificial Intelligence in Predicting Hospital Readmissions After Orthopaedic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Numerous applications and strategies have been utilized to help assess the trends and patterns of readmissions after orthopaedic surgery in an attempt to extrapolate possible risk factors and causative agents. The aim of this work is to systematically summarize the available literature on the extent to which natural language processing, machine learning, and artificial intelligence (AI) can help improve the predictability of hospital readmissions after orthopaedic and spine surgeries. METHODS: This is a systematic review and meta-analysis. PubMed, Embase and Google Scholar were searched, up until August 30, 2023, for studies that explore the use of AI, natural language processing, and machine learning tools for the prediction of readmission rates after orthopedic procedures. Data regarding surgery type, patient population, readmission outcomes, advanced models utilized, comparison methods, predictor sets, the inclusion of perioperative predictors, validation method, size of training and testing sample, accuracy, and receiver operating characteristics (C-statistic), among other factors, were extracted and assessed. RESULTS: A total of 26 studies were included in our final dataset. The overall summary C-statistic showed a mean of 0.71 across all models, indicating a reasonable level of predictiveness. A total of 15 articles (57%) were attributed to the spine, making it the most commonly explored orthopaedic field in our study. When comparing accuracy of prediction models between different fields, models predicting readmissions after hip/knee arthroplasty procedures had a higher prediction accuracy (mean C-statistic = 0.79) than spine (mean C-statistic = 0.7) and shoulder (mean C-statistic = 0.67). In addition, models that used single institution data, and those that included intraoperative and/or postoperative outcomes, had a higher mean C-statistic than those utilizing other data sources, and that include only preoperative predictors. According to the Prediction model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool, the majority of the articles in our study had a high risk of bias. CONCLUSION: AI tools perform reasonably well in predicting readmissions after orthopaedic procedures. Future work should focus on standardizing study methodologies and designs, and improving the data analysis process, in an attempt to produce more reliable and tangible results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Effect of intranasal insulin on perioperative cognitive function in older adults: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative cognitive impairment are common neural complications in older surgical patients and exacerbate the burden of medical care on families and society. METHODS: A total of 140 older patients who were scheduled for elective orthopaedic surgery or pancreatic surgery with general anaesthesia were randomly assigned to Group S or Group I with a 1:1 allocation. Patients in Group S and Group I received intranasal administration of 400 µL of normal saline or 40 IU/400 µL of insulin, respectively, once daily from 5 minutes before anaesthesia induction until 3 days postoperatively. Perioperative cognitive function was assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment-Basic (MoCA-B) at 1 day before and 3 days after surgery and postoperative delirium (POD) incidence was assessed using the 3-minute Diagnostic Interview for CAM (3D-CAM) on postoperative days 1-3. Serum levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumour necrosis factor α (TNF-α), S100-ß and C-reactive protein (CRP) were measured on the first day after surgery. RESULTS: Insulin treatment significantly increased postoperative MMSE and MoCA-B scores in group I than in group S (P < 0.001, P = 0.001, respectively), decreased the incidence of POD within the 3-day postoperative period in Group I than in Group S (10.9% vs 26.6%, P = 0.024), and inhibited postoperative IL-6 and S100-ß levels in Group I compared to Group S (P = 0.034, P = 0.044, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Intranasal insulin administration is thus suggested as a potential therapy to improve postoperative cognition in older patients undergoing surgery. However, a more standardized multi-centre, large-sample study is needed to further validate these results.

Comparison of different immobilisation durations following open surgery for acute achilles tendon rupture: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: In recent decades, early rehabilitation after Achilles tendon rupture (ATR) repair has been proposed. The aim of this prospective cohort study was to compare different immobilisation durations in order to determine the optimal duration after open surgery for ATR repair. METHODS: This study included 1088 patients (mean age, 34.9 ± 5.9 years) who underwent open surgery for acute ATR repair. The patients were categorised into four groups (A, B, C, and D) according to postoperative immobilisation durations of 0, 2, 4, and 6 weeks, respectively. All patients received the same suture technique and a similar rehabilitation protocol after brace removal,; they were clinically examined at 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16 weeks postoperatively, with a final follow-up at a mean of 19.0 months. The primary outcome was the recovery time for the one-leg heel-rise height (OHRH). Secondary outcomes included the time required to return to light exercise (LE) and the recovery times for the range of motion (ROM). Data regarding the surgical duration, complications, the visual analogue scale (VAS) score for pain, the Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS), and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Scale score were also collected. RESULTS: The recovery times for OHRH, LE, and ROM were significantly shorter in groups A and B than in groups C and D (P < 0.001). The VAS scores decreased over time, reaching 0 in all groups by 10 weeks. The mean scores in groups A and B were higher than those in the other groups at 2 and 4 weeks (P < 0.001), whereas the opposite was true at 8 weeks (P < 0.001). ATRS and the AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot scale score increased across all groups over time, showing significant between-group differences from weeks 6 to 16 (P < 0.001) and weeks 6 to 12 (P < 0.001). The mean scores were better in groups A and B than in groups C and D. Thirty-eight complications (3.5%) were observed, including 20 re-ruptures and 18 superficial infections. All complications were resolved at the last follow-up, with no significant between-group differences. CONCLUSIONS: Immobilisation for 2 weeks after open surgery for ATR repair may be the optimal strategy for early rehabilitation with relatively minimal pain and other complications. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04663542).

Does the Day of the Week or the Time of Day Affect the Length of Stay or Readmission Rate for Pediatric Orthopedic Admissions?

PURPOSE: Health care institutions are searching for system-wide approaches to reduce costs while maintaining quality and improving patient outcomes. Hospital length of stay (LOS) and readmission rate (RR) are variables that significantly impact health care costs. This investigation aimed to determine if there was a difference in the LOS and the RR for pediatric orthopedic patients admitted overnight or during the weekend. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed 243 admissions for pediatric orthopedic surgery cases between September 2016 and August 2018 at a single-specialty orthopedic hospital. We categorized admissions into elective surgeries, infectious etiologies, and trauma and accidents. We compared the time and day of the week of admission to the average LOS and RR. RESULTS: The mean LOS of the entire cohort was 2.93 days. The mean LOS for trauma admissions was 1.90 days, the mean LOS for elective surgeries was 3.34 days, and the mean LOS for infections was 4.11 (p = 0.00009). The mean LOS for patients admitted on a weekday was 3.00 days; the mean LOS for patients admitted on the weekend was 2.33 days (p = 0.28). The mean LOS for patients admitted between 6:00 AM and 6:00 PM was 3.12 days, and the mean LOS for patients admitted between 6:00 PM and 6:00 AM was 2.66 days (p = 0.22). The mean LOS for patients admitted during regular operating hours was 3.12 days, and the mean LOS for patients admitted during off-hours was 2.67 days (p = 0.22). The mean RR for trauma admissions was 0.0%, the mean RR for elective surgeries was 4.5%, and the mean for infections was 3.7% (p = 0.1073). The mean RR for patients admitted on a weekday was 3.2%, and the mean RR for patients admitted on the weekend was 0.0% (p = 0.37). The mean RR for patients admitted between 6:00 AM and 6:00 PM was 4.2%, and the mean RR for patients admitted between 6:00 PM and 6:00 AM was 1.0% (p = 0.15). The mean RR for patients admitted during regular operating hours was 4.2%, and the mean RR for patients admitted during off-hours was 1.0% (p = 0.14). CONCLUSION: This study showed no relationship between the day or time of admission and the LOS or RR for pediatric orthopedic admissions. Our results support the institutional goal of maintaining operations overnight and on weekends while not compromising patient outcomes.

Exploring versatile applications of a vacuum-assisted bone harvester in orthopedic surgery.

BACKGROUND: Orthopedic procedures often require removing bone or pathological tissue, with traditional methods involving instruments like curettes and rongeurs. However, these methods can be time-consuming and lead to increased blood loss. To mitigate these side effects, vacuum-assisted tools have been developed to aid in tissue removal. These devices enable surgeons to suction tissue without discarding it, potentially improving outcomes in conditions such as osteomyelitis or tumor removal while enabling collection of the material for downstream applications. Despite limited research, vacuum-assisted devices show promise beyond bone marrow harvesting. This study assesses infection and clearance rates, estimated blood loss, and total procedure time associated with the use of vacuum-assisted tissue removal, with a goal to understand if these devices can be used for tissue removal across a variety of pathologic conditions. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients undergoing orthopedic procedures with the Avitus® Bone Harvester repurposed from its original design from December 1, 2021, to July 1, 2023. Procedures were categorized into oncology, and debridement for infection cases. Infection cases were further categorized into those secondary to trauma and those involving primary infections (osteomyelitis and periprosthetic joint infection). Clinical variables, including demographics, intraoperative details, complications, and follow-up, were reviewed. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics computed with R Studio. RESULTS: The study included 44 patients, with debridement for infection cases being the most common (primary infection: 45.5%; infection secondary to trauma: 18.1%), followed by oncology cases (36.4%). In all oncology cases, a definitive diagnosis was established using the device, and no post-operative infections were reported. The infection clearance rate was 85.0% for primary infection cases and 50.0% for cases of infection following trauma. Across the entire cohort, the average blood loss was 314.52 mL (sd: 486.74), and the average total procedure time was 160.93 min (sd: 91.07). The overall reoperation rate was 47.7%, with an unplanned reoperation rate of 11.4%. CONCLUSION: The vacuum-assisted bone harvester was effectively utilized in a wide range of debridement and curettage procedures across diverse orthopedic surgeries. In oncology cases, the device enabled effective tissue removal with comparable recurrence rates, demonstrating its potential to minimize contamination while preserving tissue for accurate diagnoses. Additionally, a high rate of osteomyelitis eradication was observed in debridement for primary infection cases (85%). Despite the relatively high reoperation rate of 47.7%, it is crucial to interpret this figure within the context of the varied reasons for reoperation. Many of these reoperations were planned as part of a staged approach to treatment or were unrelated to the device's performance. It is crucial to acknowledge that isolating the device's contribution to these results can be difficult. The utilization of the device should be guided by considerations of cost-effectiveness and patient-specific risk factors.

Staphylococcus aureus screening and preoperative decolonisation with Mupirocin and Chlorhexidine to reduce the risk of surgical site infections in orthopaedic surgery: a pre-post study.

BACKGROUND: Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus is a risk factor for surgical site infections (SSI) in orthopaedic surgery. The efficacy of decolonisation for S. aureus on reducing the risk of SSI is uncertain in this speciality. The objective was to evaluate the impact of a nasal screening strategy of S. aureus and targeted decolonisation on the risk of S. aureus SSI. METHODS: A retrospective pre-post and here-elsewhere study was conducted between January 2014 and June 2020 in 2 adult orthopaedic surgical sites (North and South) of a French university hospital. Decolonisation with Mupirocin and Chlorhexidine was conducted in S. aureus carriers starting February 2017 in the South site (intervention group). Scheduled surgical procedures for hip, knee arthroplasties, and osteosyntheses were included and monitored for one year. The rates of S. aureus SSI in the intervention group were compared to a historical control group (South site) and a North control group. The risk factors for S. aureus SSI were analysed by logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 5,348 surgical procedures was included, 100 SSI of which 30 monomicrobial S. aureus SSI were identified. The preoperative screening result was available for 60% (1,382/2,305) of the intervention group patients. Among these screenings, 25.3% (349/1,382) were positive for S. aureus and the efficacy of the decolonisation was 91.6% (98/107). The rate of S. aureus SSI in the intervention group (0.3%, 7/2,305) was not significantly different from the historical control group (0.5%, 9/1926) but differed significantly from the North control group (1.3%, 14/1,117). After adjustment, the risk factors of S. aureus SSI occurrence were the body mass index (ORaper unit, 1.05; 95%CI, 1.0-1.1), the Charlson comorbidity index (ORaper point, 1.34; 95%CI, 1.0-1.8) and operative time (ORaper minute, 1.01; 95%CI, 1.00-1.02). Having benefited from S. aureus screening/decolonisation was a protective factor (ORa, 0.24; 95%CI, 0.08-0.73). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the low number of SSI, nasal screening and targeted decolonisation of S. aureus were associated with a reduction in S. aureus SSI.

Thermographic analysis of perforations in polyurethane blocks performed with experimental conical drill bit in comparison to conventional orthopedic drill bit: a preliminary study.

OBJECTIVE: Conical orthopedic drill bits may have the potential to improve the stabilization of orthopedic screws. During perforations, heat energy is released, and elevated temperatures could be related to thermal osteonecrosis. This study was designed to evaluate the thermal behavior of an experimental conical drill bit, when compared to the conventional cylindrical drill, using polyurethane blocks perforations. RESULTS: The sample was divided into two groups, according to the method of drilling, including 25 polyurethane blocks in each: In Group 1, perforations were performed with a conventional orthopedic cylindrical drill; while in Group 2, an experimental conical drill was used. No statistically significant difference was observed in relation to the maximum temperature (MT) during the entire drilling in the groups, however the perforation time (PT) was slightly longer in Group 2. Each drill bit perforated five times and number of perforations was not correlated with a temperature increase, when evaluated universally or isolated by groups. The PT had no correlation with an increase in temperature when evaluating the perforations universally (n = 50) and in Group 1 alone; however, Group 2 showed an inversely proportional correlation for these variables, indicating that, for the conical drill bit, drillings with longer PT had lower MT.

Effects of anesthesia and perioperative management on mortality in geriatric orthopedic surgery: a retrospective study of 451 patients.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the effects of anesthesia methods and perioperative procedures on mortality in geriatric patients operated for hip fracture. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included patients over 65 years of age who underwent hip fracture surgery. Demographic data, risk scores, perioperative and anesthesia management were analyzed in terms of mortality. RESULTS: Data from 451 patients who were eligible for the study were analyzed. It was determined that there was no difference in mortality between the anesthesia methods administered to the patients in hip fracture surgery (p>0.05).  Being male increased the mortality risk by 4.568 times (95% CI: 1.215-17.168), and a one-unit increase in the number of erythrocyte suspensions given perioperatively increased the mortality risk by 2.801 times (95% CI: 1.509-5.197). Additionally, an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) II score increased the mortality risk by 0.120 times (95% CI: 0.021-0.690), and a higher modified Charlson comorbidity index (mCCI) of 5-7 increased the mortality risk by 0.052 times (95% CI: 0.009-0.289). CONCLUSIONS: Although high ASA and mCCI scores, male sex, and blood transfusion were associated with mortality in geriatric hip fracture surgery, we found that the method of anesthesia did not affect mortality.

General skin and nasal decolonization with octenisan® set before and after elective orthopedic surgery in selected patients at elevated risk for revision surgery and surgical site infections-a single-center, unblinded, superiority, randomized controlled trial (BALGDEC trial).

BACKGROUND: The preoperative body surface and nasal decolonization may reduce the risk of surgical site infections (SSI) but yields conflicting results in the current orthopedic literature. METHODS: We perform a single-center, randomized-controlled, superiority trial in favor of the preoperative decolonization using a commercial product (octenidine® set). We will randomize a total number of 1000 adult elective orthopedic patients with a high risk for SSI and/or wound complications (age ≥ 80 years, chronic immune-suppression, American Society of Anesthesiologists score 3-4 points) between a decolonization (octenisan® wash lotion 1 × per day and octenisan® md nasal gel 2-3 × per day; during 5 days) and no decolonization. Decolonized patients will additionally fill a questionnaire regarding the practical difficulties, the completeness, and the adverse events of decolonization. The primary outcomes are SSI and revision surgeries for postoperative wound problems until 6 weeks postoperatively (or 1 year for surgeries with implants or bone). Secondary outcomes are unplanned revision surgeries for non-infectious problems and all adverse events. With 95% event-free surgeries in the decolonization arm versus 90% in the control arm, we formally need 2 × 474 elective orthopedic surgeries included during 2 years. DISCUSSION: In selected adult orthopedic patients with a high risk for SSI, the presurgical decolonization may reduce postoperative wound problems, including SSI. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrial.gov NCT05647252. Registered on 9 December 2022. PROTOCOL VERSION: 2 (5 December 2022).

[How does trauma secondary to unexpected extreme weather affect orthopaedic surgery departments? : An epidemiological study on the Filomena snowstorm]. / Wie wirken sich Traumata infolge unerwarteter Wetterextreme auf orthopädisch-chirurgische Abteilungen aus? : Eine epidemiologische Studie über den Schneesturm Filomena.

INTRODUCTION: Trauma secondary to extreme weather events may heavily impact the normal activity of orthopaedic surgery departments, especially in places not prepared to deal with them. The Filomena snowstorm, which happened in January 2021, was one of the greatest snowstorms ever in Spain. During it, the constant influx of trauma patients caused Orthopaedic Emergencies Department (OED) to collapse. The primary objective of this study was to describe the orthopaedic injuries and changes in fracture's epidemiology observed during this exceptional period. Secondary objectives were to analyse the collected variables in order to minimize the future impact of these unexpected extreme weather events. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study between patients that came to the OED during the snowstorm (Filomena group) and those who came on the same period of the previous year (Control group) was made. The following data were collected: age, sex, injury location, injury mechanism, diagnosis, AO/OTA fracture classification, treatment type (conservative vs surgical) and delay of surgical treatment. RESULTS: A total of 1237 patients were included, 655 patients from the Filomena group and 582 from the Control group. One in two patients in the Filomena group sustained a fracture (50.7% vs 23.2%). The most frequent diagnosis on the Filomena group was distal radius fracture (16.2%), which was five times more frequent than in the Control group (3.4%). A significant increment was also observed in the incidence of ankle (21.7%) and proximal humerus (33%) fractures. In the Filomena group, surgically treated fractures increased by 168%, being more severe, as C­type fractures were more prevalent (23% vs 13%). Mean delay to surgery was 6.78 days during the snowstorm. CONCLUSION: Unexpected snowstorms entail an exponential rise in orthopaedic care demand and OED pressures. A significant increment in orthopaedic trauma surgery, up to 168% more, particularly distal radius, proximal humerus and ankle fractures, is to be expected, which will imply elective surgery cancellation, hurting patients and increasing costs.

Effect of comprehensive nursing intervention on the formation of pressure sore in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery in prone position.

Pressure ulcers are a common complication of prone orthopaedic surgery, causing pain and inconvenience to patients. This study aimed to evaluate a comprehensive nursing intervention for pressure ulcer formation in these patients. A total of 120 patients undergoing prone orthopaedic surgery were randomly divided into two groups. The study group (60 patients) received a comprehensive nursing intervention, whereas the control group (60 patients) received a routine nursing intervention. After 2 weeks, the comprehensive nursing intervention significantly reduced the incidence and degree of pressure sores and led to a shorter recovery time than the routine nursing intervention (p < 0.05). The incidence of postoperative wound complications was decreased, and patient satisfaction was significantly improved (p < 0.05). The Hamilton Anxiety Scale, Hamilton Depression Scale and visual analogue scale scores of the study group were significantly lower than those of the control group, and the Short Form 36 Health Survey Questionnaire scores were higher than those of the control group (p < 0.05). A comprehensive nursing intervention can significantly reduce the incidence and degree of pressure ulcers, accelerate recovery time, reduce postoperative wound complications and improve the quality of life and satisfaction of patients undergoing prone orthopaedic surgery.

Incidence and treatment-related risk factors of inhibitor development after intensive FVIII replacement for major orthopaedic surgery in previous treated haemophilia A.

INTRODUCTION: Haemophilia A (HA) is an X-linked recessive bleeding disorder caused by lack or deficiency of coagulation factor VIII. AIM: The aim of this study is to determine the incidence and treatment-related risk factors of inhibitor development after intensive FVIII replacement for major orthopaedic surgery in previous treated persons with HA. METHODS: A total of 151 HA who underwent 221 major orthopaedic surgical procedures after intensive FVIII treatment were reviewed. The results of inhibitor tests were collected. Potential clinical risk factors for inhibitor development were analyzed. RESULTS: 111 people were diagnosed with severe HA. Thirty-seven persons (24.5%) had history of previous intensive FVIII treatment for surgical procedure. They received a mean perioperative cumulative FVIII of 498 iu/kg within first week after surgery. Seven cases (4.6%) developed an inhibitor post-operatively in our study. Surgical procedure for pseudotumor and the group of persons who experienced postoperative complications had the higher incidence of inhibitor development (9.5%, 13.3% respectively). Only previous history for intensive FVIII exposure was considered as a significant predictor for postoperative inhibitor development after multivariate logistic regression analysis (OR: 29.5, P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: The incidence of inhibitor development in previously treated persons with HA undergoing major orthopaedic surgery was 4.6% and the history of previous intensive FVIII treatment for surgery was associated with higher risk of inhibitor development.

Effect of topical vancomycin powder on surgical site infection prevention in major orthopaedic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with trial sequential analysis.

BACKGROUND: Evidence has been mixed regarding the effect of topical vancomycin (VCM) powder in reducing surgical site infection (SSI). AIM: To clarify the effect of topical VCM powder for the prevention of SSI in major orthopaedic surgeries. METHODS: The MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, ICTRP, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched from their inception to September 25th, 2023. Randomized controlled trials comparing topical VCM powder and controls for the prevention of SSI in major orthopaedic surgeries were included. Two reviewers independently screened the title and abstract and extracted relevant data, followed by the assessment of the risk of bias and the certainty of the evidence. Main outcome measures were overall SSI, reoperation, and adverse events. Summary results were obtained using random-effects meta-analysis. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was performed. FINDINGS: Eight randomized controlled trials yielded data on 4307 participants. VCM powder showed no difference in reducing overall SSI. The cumulative number of patients did not exceed the required information size of 19,233 in our TSA, and the Z-curves did not cross the trial sequential monitoring or futility boundary, suggesting an inconclusive result of the meta-analysis. No difference was found for reoperation. Among SSIs, VCM powder showed a statistically significant difference in reducing Gram-positive cocci SSI. However, the certainty of this evidence was very low. CONCLUSION: This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests inconclusive results regarding the effect of VCM powder in reducing SSI in major orthopaedic surgeries. Further trials using rigorous methodologies are required to elucidate the effect of this intervention.