Competence of Senior Otolaryngology Residents with the Bedside Head Impulse Test-Has There Been Improvement After 5 Years of Competency By Design?

BACKGROUND: The bedside head impulse test (bHIT) is a clinical method of assessing the vestibulo-ocular reflex. It is a critical component of the bedside assessment of dizzy patients and helps differentiate acute stroke from vestibular neuritis. A previous study on senior Otolaryngology residents showed poor competence in performing and interpreting the bHIT and called for specific evaluations in the Competency By Design (CBD) curriculum to remedy this. This study aimed to assess whether those competencies have improved after full implementation of CBD in residency programs. METHODS: Thirty post-graduate year 4 Otolaryngology residents in Canada were evaluated on the use of the bHIT using a written multiple-choice question (MCQ) examination, interpretation of bHIT videos, and performance of a bHIT. Ratings of bHIT performance were completed by 2 expert examiners (DT, DL) using the Ottawa Clinic Assessment Tool. RESULTS: Only 6.7% (rater DT) and 20% (rater DL) of residents were found able to perform the bHIT independently. Inter-rater reliability was moderate (0.55, intraclass correlation). Mean scores were 70% (13.4% standard deviation) for video interpretation and 59% (20.6% standard deviation) for multiple-choice questions. Video interpretation scores did not correlate with bHIT ratings (Pearson r = 0.11), but MCQs and bHIT ratings did correlate moderately (Pearson r = 0.52).Comparing to the prior study, residents performed worse on the bHIT (3.14 average score vs 3.64, P < .01) and fewer residents performed the bHIT independently (6.7% vs 22%-rater DT, 20% vs 39%-rater DL). Residents also performed worse on MCQs (58.7% vs 70.9%, P = 0.038), though similarly on video interpretation (70% vs 65%, P = .198). CONCLUSION: Fourth year OTL-HNS residents in Canada are not competent in performing the bHIT. These findings have implications for refining competency-based curricula in the evaluation of critical physical exam skills.

An International Survey of the Diagnosis and Management of Ménière's Disease Amongst Otolaryngology Consultants.

Ménière's Disease (MD) is a disease that may be difficult to diagnose and manage. Our UK survey showed variability in the practice of UK Otolaryngology consultants. We hence surveyed Otolaryngology consultants internationally, to assess their confidence levels in diagnosing MD, their use of the AAO-HNS guidelines and current diagnostic and treatment modalities. An online questionnaire was distributed internationally over four weeks. The questionnaire asked respondents to anonymously rank their confidence in diagnosing MD, identify the minimum investigations required to make a diagnosis, describe their use of the AAO-HNS criteria, share their preferred treatment modalities for acute attacks, and state their 1st and 2nd-line preventative treatment options. A total of 173 responses were collected with 77% of respondents reporting high levels of confidence in diagnosing MD. Most respondents stated the minimum tests required were "History, Otoscopy, Clinical Vestibular testing, and Pure Tone Audiometry" although some chose as few as 1 test. Regarding the use of the AAO-HNS criteria, responses ranged from "always" (20.2%) to "never" (22.5%). Cinnarizine was the first-line treatment for acute attacks followed by betahistine. Betahistine (30.1%) and dietary restrictions (28.3%) were recommended almost equally as first-line preventative measures. The most popular second-line measure was intratympanic steroids injection (30.1%). Our survey revealed disparities in the diagnosis of MD and its management, like the results of our previously conducted UK survey. This suggests the need for an international consensus regarding the diagnosis and subsequent management strategies for this disease.

Effect of librarian collaboration on otolaryngology systematic review and meta-analysis quality.

Objective: To determine if librarian collaboration was associated with improved database search quality, search reproducibility, and systematic review reporting in otolaryngology systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Methods: In this retrospective cross-sectional study, PubMed was queried for systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in otolaryngology journals in 2010, 2015, and 2021. Two researchers independently extracted data. Two librarians independently rated search strategy reproducibility and quality for each article. The main outcomes include association of librarian involvement with study reporting quality, search quality, and publication metrics in otolaryngology systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Categorical data were compared with Chi-Squared tests or Fisher's Exact tests. Continuous variables were compared via Mann Whitney U Tests for two groups, and Kruskal-Wallis Tests for three or more groups. Results: Of 559 articles retrieved, 505 were analyzed. More studies indicated librarian involvement in 2021 (n=72, 20.7%) compared to 2015 (n=14, 10.4%) and 2010 (n=2, 9.0%) (p=0.04). 2021 studies showed improvements in properly using a reporting tool (p<0.001), number of databases queried (p<0.001), describing date of database searches (p<0.001), and including a flow diagram (p<0.001). Librarian involvement was associated with using reporting tools (p<0.001), increased number of databases queried (p<0.001), describing date of database search (p=0.002), mentioning search peer reviewer (p=0.02), and reproducibility of search strategies (p<0.001). For search strategy quality, librarian involvement was associated with greater use of "Boolean & proximity operators" (p=0.004), "subject headings" (p<0.001), "text word searching" (p<0.001), and "spelling/syntax/line numbers" (p<0.001). Studies with librarian involvement were associated with publication in journals with higher impact factors for 2015 (p=0.003) and 2021 (p<0.001). Conclusion: Librarian involvement was associated with improved reporting quality and search strategy quality. Our study supports the inclusion of librarians in review teams, and journal editing and peer reviewing teams.

The Evolving Role of Biologics in Otorhinolaryngology:Innovations, Applications, and Future Perspectives.

The introduction of biologics into otorhinolaryngology has marked a significant shift in the management of complex and chronic ENT (Ear, Nose and Throat) conditions. This review delves into the mechanisms, clinical applications, and evidence supporting the use of biologics in treating disorders such as chronic rhinosinusitis, allergic rhinitis, head and neck cancer, and autoimmune inner ear disease. By examining current research and clinical trials, this article provides an in-depth analysis of the transformative impact of biologics and discusses future directions in this rapidly advancing field.

Clinical research and observations - they do matter.

The new issue of Rhinology is full of articles focusing on clinical aspects and analysis of surgical and medical treatments we provide to our patients.

Is ChatGPT 3.5 smarter than Otolaryngology trainees? A comparison study of board style exam questions.

OBJECTIVES: This study compares the performance of the artificial intelligence (AI) platform Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT) to Otolaryngology trainees on board-style exam questions. METHODS: We administered a set of 30 Otolaryngology board-style questions to medical students (MS) and Otolaryngology residents (OR). 31 MSs and 17 ORs completed the questionnaire. The same test was administered to ChatGPT version 3.5, five times. Comparisons of performance were achieved using a one-way ANOVA with Tukey Post Hoc test, along with a regression analysis to explore the relationship between education level and performance. RESULTS: The average scores increased each year from MS1 to PGY5. A one-way ANOVA revealed that ChatGPT outperformed trainee years MS1, MS2, and MS3 (p = <0.001, 0.003, and 0.019, respectively). PGY4 and PGY5 otolaryngology residents outperformed ChatGPT (p = 0.033 and 0.002, respectively). For years MS4, PGY1, PGY2, and PGY3 there was no statistical difference between trainee scores and ChatGPT (p = .104, .996, and 1.000, respectively). CONCLUSION: ChatGPT can outperform lower-level medical trainees on Otolaryngology board-style exam but still lacks the ability to outperform higher-level trainees. These questions primarily test rote memorization of medical facts; in contrast, the art of practicing medicine is predicated on the synthesis of complex presentations of disease and multilayered application of knowledge of the healing process. Given that upper-level trainees outperform ChatGPT, it is unlikely that ChatGPT, in its current form will provide significant clinical utility over an Otolaryngologist.

Women Surgeon Speakers at AAO-HNS Annual Meetings.

This cross-sectional study examines the gender diversity of speakers at the American Academy of Otolaryngology­Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) annual meetings over a 14-year period.

National Survey of Otolaryngology Program Directors Regarding Recruitment Methods for Underrepresented in Medicine Residents.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize Otolaryngology residency program strategies for recruiting underrepresented minorities in medicine (URiM) residents and their perceived effectiveness, and explore perceived barriers to recruitment. DESIGN: We conducted a survey of Otolaryngology program directors (PDs) at the 122 accredited programs within the United States, utilizing a validated and previously published survey utilized within the OB-GYN literature. We solicited information regarding recruitment of underrepresented minorities in medicine (URiM) applicants, effectiveness of strategies, and perceived barriers in recruitment. SETTING: A national survey of U.S. accredited residency programs in Otolaryngology in 2022-2023. RESULTS: A total of 42 (34%) PDs responded. 55% of programs reported an increase in URiM residents, of which 18(43%) described an intentional change. Almost all PDs reported placing at least "some" significance in the recruitment of URiM residents (95%). Statistically significant differences were seen in recruitment methods between programs that saw an increase in URiM resident recruitment an those that did not. Additionally, Program Directors believed that increased face-face interaction with applicants were the most effective forms of recruitment. PDs found the biggest challenge to recruitment was a lack of diverse applicants (6.3/10) and faculty (5.8/10). This perception did not change when adjusted for programs that saw an increase in URiM trainee recruitment. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the URiM resident recruitment practices and perceived effectiveness of these strategies within otolaryngology programs nationally. The results and analysis may provide programs who are looking to diversify their workforce with some effective and meaningful strategies to start the process.

Evaluating diagnostic and management agreement between physiotherapists and ear, nose and throat specialist in a primary contact physiotherapy-led vestibular clinic: A prospective blinded inter-rater agreement pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Dizziness and vertigo are common referrals to Ear Nose Throat (ENT) outpatient services however these services have long waitlists for assessment. Primary contact physiotherapy-led vestibular clinics are recognized as improving access to care. This pilot study investigated agreement between physiotherapists and an ENT medical practitioner for diagnostic and management decisions in patients attending a primary contact physiotherapy-led vestibular clinic. METHODS: Prospective blinded inter-rater agreement study undertaken in an ENT primary contact physiotherapy-led vestibular clinic. Participants were adults referred to ENT from general practitioners, triaged (Category 2 or 3) to the primary contact physiotherapy-led vestibular clinic with clinical symptoms consistent with vestibular disorder. Primary outcome measures included agreement of diagnoses and management decisions made by an ENT medical practitioner and Physiotherapist based on a vestibular physiotherapy assessment. Adverse events were reviewed 11 months post data collection. Gwet's first order agreement co-efficient (AC1) calculated inter-rater reliability between physiotherapy and ENT. RESULTS: Fifty-one participants were recruited consecutively from the primary contact physiotherapy-led vestibular clinic. Physiotherapy and ENT had a substantial agreement (AC1 0.613) on diagnosis. AC1 between physiotherapy and ENT for recommending Magnetic resonance imaging (0.810) and computerized tomography (0.935) both indicated near perfect agreement. There was moderate to near-perfect agreement regarding management recommendations between physiotherapy and ENT. Substantial agreement (AC1 0.720) was found for recommendations for ENT input, near perfect agreement (AC1 0.933) for neurology input and moderate agreement (AC1 0.574) for physiotherapy input. There were no adverse events from physiotherapist's management decision, based on final recommendations undertaken 11-months post data collection. CONCLUSIONS: Physiotherapists and ENT medical practitioner made comparable diagnostic and management decisions, based on physiotherapy and audiology hearing assessment, for adults with signs of vestibular dysfunction, within an ENT primary contact physiotherapy-led vestibular clinic. This study provides support for this type of Physiotherapy-led service in managing patients referred to an ENT service with vestibular dysfunction.

Using learning-by-concordance to develop reasoning in epistaxis management with online feedback: A pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Epistaxis is a recurring cause for referral to emergency departments. Its management can be complex; hence, it is critical to provide appropriate support to Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (OHNS) residents to develop clinical reasoning skills to manage such cases. Learning-by-Concordance (LbC) is a recently developed educational tool that encourages learners to think through simulated clinical scenarios. A panel of ENTs provides insightful feedback to residents, reflecting a diversity of opinions about practice. Our study aimed to assess LbC's feasibility and perceived value for training OHNS residents in epistaxis management. METHODS: In this qualitative study, three OHNS surgeons, including two faculty members and one resident, wrote the LbC scenarios. The LbC tool was made available to participants through an online platform. A panel of four OHNS faculty provided feedback on answers to LbC questions. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery residents participated and provided their opinion on the value of this educational tool through an online questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 10 one-hour sessions were required to create and upload the training tool. To provide insightful feedback embedded in the learning tool, the four panelists needed 60 min each. Of the 37 participating residents, 25 (68%) completed the training. Overall satisfaction was high: 88% appreciated the training method, and 92% wanted to use this type of training again. Most residents felt the training enabled them to improve their clinical reasoning when encountering a patient with epistaxis (92%) and their knowledge about epistaxis (96%). CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that OHNS residents could benefit from clinical reasoning exercises with panelist feedback using the LbC approach for clinical presentations that require complex approaches to manage conditions such as epistaxis.

3D-printed temporal bone models for training: Does material transparency matter?

PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of 3D-printed temporal bone models with two different material transparencies on trainees' mastoidectomy performance. METHODS: Eleven ORL residents performed two anatomical mastoidectomies with posterior tympanotomy on two 3D-printed models with different transparency and VR simulation training. Participants where divided into two groups based on their experience. Within each group participants were randomized to start with the model printed in a completely opaque material or in a material featuring some degree of transparency. After drilling on 3D-printed models, the participants performed two similar mastoidectomies on human cadavers: one on the left side of one cadaver and one on the right side of another cadaver. After drilling 3D-printed models and cadavers, the final-product performances were evaluated by two experienced raters using the 26-item modified Welling Scale. Participants also evaluated the models using a questionnaire. RESULTS: Overall, the participants performed 25 % better on the 3D-printed models featuring transparency compared to the opaque models (18.6 points vs 14.9 points, mean difference = 3.7, 95 % CI 2.0-5.3, P < 0.001)). This difference in performance was independent of which material the participants had drilled first. In addition, the residents also subjectively rated the transparent model to be closer to cadaver dissection. The experienced group starting with the 3D-printed models scored 21.5 points (95 % CI 20.0-23.1), while the group starting with VR simulation training score 18.4 points (95 % CI 16.6-20.3). CONCLUSION: We propose that material used for 3D-printing temporal bone models should feature some degree of transparency, like natural bone, for trainees to learn and exploit key visual cues during drilling.

Do Otologists and Other Otolaryngologists Manage Single-Sided Deafness Differently?

BACKGROUND:  The aim of this study was to survey the knowledge and treatment management practices for single-sided deafness (SSD) among different subspecialties of otolaryngology. METHODS:  A questionnaire was sent via Google Sheets to members of the Turkish and Egyptian Otorhinolaryngology Societies between December 2021 and February 2022. For the statistical analysis, the respondents were divided into 3 groups as otologists, non-otologists, and residents at the department of otolaryngology-head and neck department. RESULTS:  There were no statistically significant differences between otologists and non-otologists in radiological imaging (child P = .469, adult P = .140) and preferred treatment method (child P = .546, adult P = .106). However, otolaryngologists showed significant differences in radiological evaluation (P <.001), vestibular evaluation (P = .000), and frequency of treatment options recommended for pediatric and adult SSD patients (P = .000). CONCLUSION:  There were no significant differences in SSD diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation between otologists and non-otologists. However, when comparing pediatric and adult patients, there was a difference in the treatment management of SSD patients.

[XXII Moscow Scientific and Practical Conference "Otorhinolaryngology: Traditions and Modernity", dedicated to the 100th anniversary of the birth of Professors Liya Borisovna Daynyak and Boris Mikhailovich Sagalovich. Part 2]. / XXII Moskovskaya nauchno-prakticheskaya konferentsiya «Otorinolaringologiya: traditsii i sovremennost'¼, posvyashchennaya 100-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya professorov Lii Borisovny Dainyak i Borisa Mikhailovicha Sagalovicha. Chast' 2.

XXII Moscow Scientific and Practical Conference "Otorhinolaryngology: Traditions and Modernity", dedicated to the 100th anniversary of the birth of Professors Liya Borisovna Daynyak and Boris Mikhailovich Sagalovich. Part 2.

Evaluation of the BOPPPS model on otolaryngologic education for five-year undergraduates.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of the BOPPPS model (bridge-in, learning objective, pre-test, participatory learning, post-test, and summary) in otolaryngology education for five-year undergraduate students. METHODS: A non-randomized controlled trial was conducted with 167 five-year undergraduate students from Anhui Medical University, who were allocated to an experimental group and a control group. The experimental group received instruction using the BOPPPS model, while the control group underwent traditional teaching methods. The evaluation of the teaching effectiveness was performed through an anonymous questionnaire based on the course evaluation questionnaire. Students' perspectives and self-evaluations were quantified using a five-point Likert scale. Furthermore, students' comprehension of the course content was measured through a comprehensive final examination at the end of the semester. RESULTS: Students in the experimental group reported significantly higher scores in various competencies compared to the control group: planning work (4.27 ± 0.676 vs. 4.03 ± 0.581, P < 0.05), problem-solving skills (4.31 ± 0.624 vs. 4.03 ± 0.559, P < 0.01), teamwork abilities (4.19 ± 0.704 vs. 3.87 ± 0.758, P < 0.05), and analytical skills (4.31 ± 0.719 vs. 4.05 ± 0.622, P < 0.05). They also reported higher motivation for learning (4.48 ± 0.618 vs. 4.09 ± 0.582, P < 0.01). Additionally, students in the experimental group felt more confident tackling unfamiliar problems (4.21 ± 0.743 vs. 3.95 ± 0.636, P < 0.05), had a clearer understanding of teachers' expectations (4.31 ± 0.552 vs. 4.08 ± 0.555, P < 0.05), and perceived more effort from teachers to understand their difficulties (4.42 ± 0.577 vs. 4.13 ± 0.59, P < 0.01). They emphasized comprehension over memorization (3.65 ± 1.176 vs. 3.18 ± 1.065, P < 0.05) and received more helpful feedback (4.40 ± 0.574 vs. 4.08 ± 0.585, P < 0.01). Lecturers were rated better at explaining concepts (4.42 ± 0.539 vs. 4.08 ± 0.619, P < 0.01) and making subjects interesting (4.50 ± 0.546 vs. 4.08 ± 0.632, P < 0.01). Overall, the experimental group expressed higher course satisfaction (4.56 ± 0.542 vs. 4.34 ± 0.641, P < 0.05). In terms of examination performance, the experimental group scored higher on the final examination (87.7 ± 6.7 vs. 84.0 ± 7.7, P < 0.01) and in noun-interpretation (27.0 ± 1.6 vs. 26.1 ± 2.4, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The BOPPPS model emerged as an effective and innovative teaching method, particularly in enhancing students' competencies in otolaryngology education. Based on the findings of this study, educators and institutions were encouraged to consider incorporating the BOPPPS model into their curricula to enhance the learning experiences and outcomes of students.

[XXII Moscow Scientific and Practical Conference "Otorhinolaryngology: Traditions and Modernity", dedicated to the 100th anniversary of the birth of professors Liya Borisovna Daynyak and Boris Mikhailovich Sagalovich. Part 1]. / XXII Moskovskaya nauchno-prakticheskaya konferentsiya «Otorinolaringologiya: traditsii i sovremennost'¼, posvyashchennaya 100-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya professorov Lii Borisovny Dainyak i Borisa Mikhailovicha Sagalovicha. Chast' 1.

Abstracts.