Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 1.464
Filter
1.
Reprod Biol Endocrinol ; 22(1): 85, 2024 Jul 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39044268

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To summarize the findings of relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and conduct a meta-analysis to investigate the potential effect of aromatase inhibitors on preventing moderate to severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in infertile women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF). METHODS: We searched for relevant RCTs in electronic databases, including MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials.gov (from inception to August 2023). In addition, we manually searched the related reviews and reference lists of included studies for further relevant studies. We included RCTs where aromatase inhibitors prescribed either during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) or in early luteal phase. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4.1 software. The primary outcome was the incidence of moderate to severe OHSS. A descriptive analysis was conducted in cases where a meta-analysis was not feasible due to heterogeneity or lack of comparable data. RESULTS: 2858 records were retrieved and 12 RCTs were finally included. Letrozole was administered in the treatment group during COS in seven RCTs, whereas in the early luteal phase in five RCTs. Compared with the control group, the risk of moderate to severe OHSS significantly reduced by 55% in the letrozole group (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.64, I2 = 0%, 5 RCTs, 494 patients). Moreover, serum estradiol (E2) levels on hCG trigger day significantly decreased with the administration of letrozole during COS (MD -847.23, 95% CI -1398.00 to -296.47, I2 = 93%, 5 RCTs, 374 patients). And serum E2 levels on the 4th, 5th and 7th to 10th day after hCG trigger were also significantly lower than those in the control group when letrozole was administered in the early luteal phase. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with high risk of OHSS probably benefit from letrozole, which has been revealed to reduce the incidence of moderate to severe OHSS by this systematic review. However, the very limited number of participants and the quality of the included studies does not allow to recommend letrozole for the prevention of severe OHSS.


Subject(s)
Aromatase Inhibitors , Fertilization in Vitro , Infertility, Female , Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome , Ovulation Induction , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Aromatase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Aromatase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Fertilization in Vitro/methods , Infertility, Female/prevention & control , Infertility, Female/etiology , Letrozole/therapeutic use , Letrozole/administration & dosage , Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome/prevention & control , Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome/epidemiology , Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome/etiology , Ovulation Induction/methods , Ovulation Induction/adverse effects , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
2.
BMJ Case Rep ; 17(7)2024 Jul 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39025799

ABSTRACT

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is a well-known iatrogenic complication of ovarian stimulation with gonadotropins. We present the case of a woman in her 30s who developed OHSS without the administration of gonadotropins. She was due to undergo intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) for primary subfertility. After taking a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor agonist for 3 weeks, she presented with abdominal pain, nausea and bloating. She was diagnosed with moderate to severe OHSS, requiring management as an inpatient.Investigations included a pelvic ultrasound scan showing an enlarged ovary, serum oestradiol >30 000 pmol/L and an MRI of the brain with an incidental finding of a 5 mm pituitary microadenoma.She recovered rapidly and was referred for endocrinology evaluation and multidisciplinary team discussion. The OHSS was felt to be explained by an unusual 'flare' response to a GnRH agonist. A further ICSI cycle with an antagonist protocol is planned.


Subject(s)
Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone , Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome , Humans , Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome/chemically induced , Female , Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone/agonists , Adult , Ovulation Induction/adverse effects , Ovulation Induction/methods , Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic
3.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 103(28): e38902, 2024 Jul 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38996099

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study is to evaluate the risk factors for empty follicle syndrome (EFS) in patients with diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) undergoing an intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycle. In this retrospective study, patients with DOR were divided into 2 groups according to the presence of empty follicles on the day of oocyte retrieval. Patient age, body mass index (BMI), anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), baseline follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and estradiol (E2) levels, basal antral follicle count (AFC), total gonadotropin dose, and day of stimulation were recorded as risk factors. The association between EFS and these variables was assessed using the logistic regression method and ROC curve analysis. Increased BMI, low AMH, higher baseline FSH, low baseline AFC, higher gonadotropin dose, and longer day of ovulation induction were independent risk factors for EFS in patients with DOR. ROC curve analysis showed that BMI, AMH, baseline FSH, baseline AFC, higher gonadotropin dose, and longer ovulation induction days were predictive parameters in this group. According to the current study, higher BMI, lower AMH, higher baseline FSH, lower baseline AFC, higher gonadotropin dose and longer ovulation induction days were independent risk factors for EFS in patients with reduced ovarian reserve.


Subject(s)
Anti-Mullerian Hormone , Body Mass Index , Follicle Stimulating Hormone , Ovarian Follicle , Ovarian Reserve , Ovulation Induction , Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic , Humans , Female , Retrospective Studies , Ovarian Reserve/physiology , Adult , Risk Factors , Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic/methods , Anti-Mullerian Hormone/blood , Ovulation Induction/methods , Ovulation Induction/adverse effects , Follicle Stimulating Hormone/blood , Estradiol/blood , Oocyte Retrieval/methods , Ovarian Diseases
5.
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol ; 197: 104320, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38479585

ABSTRACT

The effects of ovarian stimulation on breast and gynecological tumor incidence remain controversial. Therefore, the aim of this meta-analysis was to study the risk of cancer in ovarian stimulation. Of the 22713 studies initially identified, 28 were eligible for inclusion. The results revealed that the impact of ovarian cancer (RR = 1.33, [1.05; 1.69]) and cervical cancer (RR = 0.67, [0.46; 0.97]) is significant among the overall effects. In subgroup analysis, in the nulliparous population (RR = 0.81 [0.68; 0.96]) was the protective factor for the breast cancer. In the Caucasians subgroup (RR = 1.45, [1.12; 1.88]), the ovarian cancer incidence was statistically significant. In the Asian subgroup (RR = 1.51, [1.00; 2.28]), the endometrial cancer incidence was statistically significant. In the subgroup of Asians (RR = 0.55 [0.44; 0.68]) and the multiparous population (RR = 0.31, [0.21; 0.46]), them can be the statistically protective factor for the cervical cancer.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Ovulation Induction , Humans , Female , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/etiology , Ovulation Induction/adverse effects , Ovulation Induction/methods , Cohort Studies , Risk Factors , Genital Neoplasms, Female/epidemiology , Genital Neoplasms, Female/etiology , Incidence
6.
J Assist Reprod Genet ; 41(4): 915-928, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38470554

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To identify and characterise appropriate comparison groups for population studies of health outcomes in ART-conceived births: ovulation induction (OI), subfertile untreated and fertile natural conceptions. Our secondary objective was to examine whether known risks of pregnancy complications and adverse birth outcomes in ART births are elevated in comparison with subfertile (untreated and OI) conception groups. METHODS: We linked State and Commonwealth datasets to identify all live and stillbirths (≥ 20 weeks) in Western Australia from 2003 to 2014 by method of conception. Demographic characteristics, maternal pre-existing conditions, adverse obstetric history and pregnancy complications were compared across conception groups. Generalised estimating equations were used to estimate adjusted risk ratios (aRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for pregnancy complications and birth outcomes in singletons. RESULTS: We identified 9456 ART, 3870 OI, 11,484 subfertile untreated and 303,921 fertile naturally conceived deliveries. OI and subfertile untreated groups more closely resembled the ART group than the fertile group; however, some differences remained across parity, maternal age, pre-existing conditions and obstetric history. In multivariate analyses, ART singletons had greater risks of placental problems (e.g. placenta praevia aRR 2.42 (95% CI 1.82-3.20)) and adverse birth outcomes (e.g. preterm birth aRR 1.38 (95% CI 1.25-1.52)) than the subfertile untreated group, while OI singletons were more similar to the subfertile group with higher risk of preeclampsia and gestational diabetes. CONCLUSION: OI and subfertile untreated conception groups offer improved options for interpreting health outcomes in ART births. Pregnancy complications (particularly placental disorders) and adverse outcomes at delivery are more common following ART.


Subject(s)
Ovulation Induction , Pregnancy Outcome , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/adverse effects , Adult , Ovulation Induction/adverse effects , Ovulation Induction/methods , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications/epidemiology , Fertilization , Premature Birth/epidemiology , Infertility/epidemiology , Maternal Age , Risk Factors , Infant, Newborn
8.
BMJ Open ; 14(2): e076867, 2024 Feb 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38365296

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to explore the association between age at menarche (AAM) and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in fresh in vitro fertilisation (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Data were collected from a large obstetrics and gynaecology hospital in Sichuan, China. PARTICIPANTS: This study included 17 419 eligible women aged ≤40 years who underwent the first IVF/ICSI cycles from January 2015 to December 2021. Women were divided into three groups according to their AAM: ≤12 years (n=5781), 13-14 years (n=9469) and ≥15 years (n=2169). RESULTS: The means of age at recruitment and AAM were 30.4 years and 13.1 years, respectively. Restricted cubic spline models suggested that early menarche age increased the risk of OHSS. The multivariable logistic analysis showed that women with menarche age ≤12 years were more likely to suffer from OHSS (OR 1.321, 95% CI 1.113 to 1.567) compared with those aged 13-14 years among the whole cohort. This significant relationship remained in women administered with different ovarian stimulation protocols and gonadotrophin doses. When stratified by female age, this correlation was presented only in patients aged ≤30 years (OR 1.362, 95% CI 1.094 to 1.694). And the mediation analysis showed that the relationship between AAM and OHSS was totally mediated by antral follicle counts (AFC). CONCLUSION: Menarche age earlier than 12 years may increase the OHSS risk in women aged ≤30 years through the mediation of AFC. More prospective studies are required to verify the results.


Subject(s)
Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome , Male , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Adult , Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome/epidemiology , Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome/etiology , Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic/methods , Menarche , Retrospective Studies , Pregnancy Rate , Semen , Fertilization in Vitro/adverse effects , Fertilization in Vitro/methods , Ovulation Induction/adverse effects , Ovulation Induction/methods
9.
Fertil Steril ; 121(5): 756-764, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38246401

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To study the contribution of ovulation induction and ovarian stimulation, in vitro fertilization (IVF), and unassisted conception to the increase in national plural births in the United States, a significant contributor to adverse maternal and infant health outcomes. DESIGN: National and IVF-assisted plural birth data were derived from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Vital Statistics System (1967-2021, after introduction of Clomiphene Citrate in the United States) and the National Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance System (1997-2021), respectively. SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENT(S): Not applicable. INTERVENTION(S): Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): In addition to IVF-assisted plural births, the contributions of unassisted conception to plural births among women aged <35 and ≥35 years were estimated using plural birth rates from 1949-1966 and a Bayesian logistic model with race and age as independent variables. The contribution of ovulation induction and ovarian stimulation was estimated as the difference between national plural births and IVF-assisted and unassisted counterparts. RESULT(S): From 1967-2021, the national twin birth rate increased 1.7-fold to a 2014 high (33.9/1,000 live births), then declined to 31.2/1,000 live births; the triplet and higher order birth rate increased 6.7-fold to a 1998 high (1.9/1,000 live births), then declined to 0.8/1,000 live births. In 2021, the contribution of unassisted conception among women aged <35 years to the national plural births was 56.1%, followed by ovulation induction and ovarian stimulation (19.5%), unassisted conception among women aged ≥35 years (16.8%), and IVF (7.6%). During 2009-2021, the contribution of ovulation induction and ovarian stimulation has remained stable, the contribution of unassisted conception among women aged <35 and ≥35 years has increased, and the contribution of IVF has decreased. CONCLUSION(S): Ovulation induction and ovarian stimulation are leading iatrogenic contributors to plural births. They are, therefore, targets for intervention to reduce the adverse maternal and infant health outcomes associated with plural births. Maternal age of ≥35 years is a significant contributor to the national plural birth increase.


Subject(s)
Fertilization in Vitro , Ovulation Induction , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Adult , Ovulation Induction/trends , Ovulation Induction/statistics & numerical data , Ovulation Induction/adverse effects , United States/epidemiology , Fertilization in Vitro/trends , Fertilization in Vitro/statistics & numerical data , Fertilization in Vitro/adverse effects , Birth Rate/trends , Maternal Age , Risk Factors , Young Adult , Live Birth/epidemiology
10.
Fertil Steril ; 121(5): 842-852, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38244020

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To study the impact of unhealthy air quality from the 2020 Oregon wildfires on outcomes for patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A university-based fertility clinic. PATIENTS: Subjects were undergoing IVF treatment from the 6 weeks preceding the wildfires through a 10-day exposure period. Cohorts were classified on the basis of whether subjects experienced patient and/or laboratory exposure to unhealthy air quality. Patient exposure was defined as at least 4 days of ovarian stimulation overlapping with the exposure, and laboratory exposure was defined as at least 2 days of IVF treatment and embryogenesis overlapping with the exposure. The unexposed cohort consisted of remaining subjects without defined exposure, with cycles in the 6 weeks preceding the wildfires. As some subjects had dual exposure and appeared in both patient and laboratory exposure cohorts, each cohort was separately compared with the unexposed control cohort. INTERVENTION: A 10-day period of unhealthy air quality caused by smoke plumes from a wildfire event. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the blastulation rate. Secondary outcomes included fertilization rate, number of blastocysts obtained, and cycles with no blastocysts frozen or transferred. RESULTS: Sixty-nine subjects underwent ovarian stimulation and IVF treatment during the 6 weeks preceding the wildfires through the 10-day period of unhealthy air quality. Of these, 15 patients were in the laboratory exposure cohort, 16 were in the patient exposure cohort, and 44 were unexposed. Six subjects appeared in both laboratory and patient exposure cohorts. Although neither exposure cohort had significantly decreased blastulation rate compared with the unexposed, the median number of blastocysts obtained was significantly lower in the laboratory exposure cohort than the unexposed group (2 [range 0-14] vs. 4.5 [range 0-21], respectively). The laboratory exposure cohort had significantly more cycles with no blastocysts obtained (3/15 [20%] vs. 1/44 [2%]). There were no significant differences in IVF treatment outcomes between patient exposure and unexposed cohorts. These findings persisted after controlling for age. There were no significant differences in pregnancy outcomes observed after embryo transfer between the exposure group and the unexposed group. CONCLUSION: For a cohort of patients undergoing IVF treatment, an acute episode of outside wildfire smoke exposure during fertilization and embryogenesis was associated with decreased blastocyst yield.


Subject(s)
Blastocyst , Fertilization in Vitro , Smoke , Wildfires , Humans , Female , Retrospective Studies , Fertilization in Vitro/adverse effects , Adult , Pregnancy , Smoke/adverse effects , Ovulation Induction/adverse effects , Pregnancy Rate , Embryo Transfer/adverse effects , Air Pollution/adverse effects , Air Pollution/analysis , Treatment Outcome , Oregon/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Air Pollutants/adverse effects , Air Pollutants/analysis , Fertility
11.
JBRA Assist Reprod ; 28(1): 13-20, 2024 Feb 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38224574

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of sublingually administered human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) in combination with clomiphene citrate (CC) or letrozole (LTZ) for ovulation induction. METHODS: In this prospective, double-blind, randomized study, the patients were divided into two placebo groups and two intervention groups using CC, LTZ, and HCG. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in ovulation induction between the groups. We compared endometrial thickness at the beginning of the cycle and during the pre-ovulatory period, and detected a moderately positive correlation when CC was administered with HCG. CONCLUSIONS: Sublingual HCG with CC caused a moderately positive correlation with endometrial thickening when compared with that at the beginning of the cycle and during the pre-ovulatory period. There was no significant change in the number of pre-ovulatory follicles.


Subject(s)
Infertility, Female , Female , Humans , Chorionic Gonadotropin/therapeutic use , Clomiphene/therapeutic use , Clomiphene/pharmacology , Fertility Agents, Female/therapeutic use , Infertility, Female/etiology , Letrozole , Nitriles/pharmacology , Nitriles/therapeutic use , Ovulation Induction/adverse effects , Prospective Studies , Triazoles/pharmacology , Triazoles/therapeutic use , Double-Blind Method
12.
JBRA Assist Reprod ; 28(2): 365-367, 2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38224578

ABSTRACT

Empty follicle syndrome is a rare condition characterized by failure to retrieve oocytes despite repeated careful aspiration of mature precursor follicles during controlled ovarian stimulation. This report presents a case of empty follicle syndrome in a patient with polycystic ovary syndrome using a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist as a trigger for final oocyte maturation. No oocytes were retrieved from the right ovary and the procedure was discontinued. The patient was administered an injection with 10,000 units of HCG and 3 oocytes were obtained after 24 hours. All oocytes were mature (MII); fertilization was performed with sperm from the patient's husband resulting in 3PN zygotes. The formation of 3PN zygotes from ICSI might be due to oocyte cytoplasmic disorders caused by long-term exposure to gonadotropins and increased duration of stimulation. Although our patient had false empty follicle syndrome and the hCG rescue protocol led to the retrieval of oocytes, the oocytes were not of good quality. As previously described, empty follicle syndrome is not a predictor of success in subsequent cycles. Our patient's next cycle was uneventful.


Subject(s)
Chorionic Gonadotropin , Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone , Ovulation Induction , Polycystic Ovary Syndrome , Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic , Zygote , Humans , Female , Polycystic Ovary Syndrome/complications , Polycystic Ovary Syndrome/drug therapy , Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone/agonists , Adult , Chorionic Gonadotropin/therapeutic use , Ovulation Induction/adverse effects , Ovulation Induction/methods , Zygote/drug effects , Oocyte Retrieval , Ovarian Follicle/drug effects , Oocytes/drug effects
13.
Reprod Biol Endocrinol ; 22(1): 14, 2024 Jan 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38243286

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Erythropoietin (Epo) is a potent vascular growth factor that induces angiogenesis and antiapoptotic signalling. We investigated whether the development of numerous follicles and corpora lutea during in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle affects circulating Epo levels and further, if Epo could be used as a novel marker for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). METHODS: 24 women were included in the uncomplicated IVF group and 35 women in the OHSS group. Repeated blood samples from both groups were analysed for Epo, progesterone, blood haemoglobin, and creatinine. Follicular fluid from the IVF group was analysed for Epo and progesterone. Repeated measure analysis was performed for the variables and circulating Epo levels were compared between the IVF group and early OHSS. Furthermore, related growth factors, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1) were analysed from subgroup of women to test for correlation with Epo. RESULTS: During IVF, circulating Epo increased from natural mid-luteal phase to stimulated mid-luteal phase (median 9.5; 95% CI 7.2-13.4 IU/L and 12.5; 10.3-13.4 IU/L; p = 0.003). In cycles resulting in pregnancy, Epo level decreased 14 days after oocyte pick-up (OPU) and remained low thereafter. In cycles not resulting in pregnancy, Epo level increased again 35 days after OPU. Follicle fluid Epo concentration was 1.5 times higher than the serum concentration (median 15.4; 95% CI 10.4-19.2 IU/L vs. 10.2; 8.8-12.7; p = 0.006). There was no difference in circulating Epo concentration between early OHSS and uncomplicated IVF. Circulating Epo did not correlate with VEGF or HIF-1. CONCLUSIONS: Circulating Epo levels fluctuate during IVF cycle. We hypothesise this may suggest Epo's involvement in ovarian physiology and angiogenesis. However, Epo was not a clinical marker for OHSS.


Subject(s)
Erythropoietin , Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome/etiology , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A , Progesterone , Fertilization in Vitro/methods , Ovulation Induction/adverse effects
14.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 1462, 2024 01 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38233530

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this article is to explore the relationship between the total dose of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) applied during controlled ovulation stimulation and the live birth rates (LBRs) in non-PCOS population. Many studies have found no difference between the dose of FSH application and pregnancy outcomes such as clinical pregnancy rates after fresh embryo transfer. However, a recent large retrospective analysis found a negative correlation between live birth rates and increasing dose of FSH. It is still controversial about the association between FSH dose and LBRs. In addition, no studies have yet explored the nonlinear relationship between FSH and LBRs. This cohort study included a total of 11,645 patients who had accepted IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) at the second hospital of Hebei medical university between December 2014 to December 2019. PCOS was identified by Rotterdam PCOS criteria. We researched the association between FSH total dose and live birth rates (LBRs) using multivariate regression analysis. In addition, a model for nonlinear relationships based on a two-part linear regression was applied. The analysis of threshold effects indicated that LBR increased with every 1000 IU FSH when the concentration of FSH was lower than 1410 IU (OR 1.55, 95% CI [1.05, 2.28]); however, a negative association between FSH dose and LBR (OR 0.94, 95% CI [0.89, 0.99]) was found when the FSH total dose was higher than 1410 IU. It is worth noting that the relationship between LBR and FSH dose varied among patients of different ages (OR 0.92 vs 1.06, P for interaction < 0.05).


Subject(s)
Birth Rate , Polycystic Ovary Syndrome , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Fertilization in Vitro , Cohort Studies , Polycystic Ovary Syndrome/etiology , Ovulation Induction/adverse effects , Semen , Follicle Stimulating Hormone , Gonadotropins , Pregnancy Rate , Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Human , Live Birth
15.
Trials ; 25(1): 38, 2024 Jan 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38212837

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Adequately selecting the initial follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) dose during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) is key for success in assisted reproduction. The objective of COS is to obtain an optimal number of oocytes to increase the chances of achieving a pregnancy, while avoiding complications for the patient. Current clinical protocols do achieve good results for the majority of patients, but further refinements in individualized FSH dosing may reduce the risk of poor ovarian response while also limiting the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) risk. Models to select the first FSH dose in COS have been presented in literature with promising results. However, most have only been developed and tested in normo-ovulatory women under the age of 40 years. METHODS: This is a randomized, controlled, multicenter, single blinded, clinical trial. This study will be performed in 236 first cycle in vitro fertilization (IVF) and/or ICSI (intracytoplasmic sperm injection) patients, randomized 1:1 in two arms. In the intervention arm, the dose of FSH will be assigned by a machine learning (ML) model called IDoser, while in the control arm, the dose will be determined by the clinician following standard practice. Stratified block randomization will be carried out depending on the patient being classified as expected low responder, high responder, or normo-responder. Patients will complete their participation in the trial once the first embryo transfer result is known. The primary outcome of the study is the number of metaphase II (MII) oocytes retrieved at ovarian pick up (OPU) and the hypothesis of non-inferiority of the intervention arm compared to the control. Secondary outcomes include the number of cycle cancelations (due to low response or no retrieval of mature oocytes), risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), and clinical pregnancy and live birth rates per first transfer. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, this is the first randomized trial to test clinical performance of an all-patient inclusive model to select the first dose of FSH for COS. Prospective trials for machine learning (ML) models in healthcare are scarce but necessary for clinical application. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05948293 . Registered on 14 July 2023.


Subject(s)
Follicle Stimulating Hormone , Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome , Male , Pregnancy , Humans , Female , Adult , Follicle Stimulating Hormone/adverse effects , Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic/methods , Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome/etiology , Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome/prevention & control , Prospective Studies , Ovulation Induction/adverse effects , Ovulation Induction/methods , Semen , Fertilization in Vitro/methods , Pregnancy Rate , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Multicenter Studies as Topic
16.
ESMO Open ; 9(2): 102228, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38232611

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) for oocyte/embryo cryopreservation is the method of choice for fertility preservation (FP) in young patients diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer (eBC). Nevertheless, some challenges still question its role, particularly in the neoadjuvant setting, where concerns arise about potential delay in the onset of anticancer treatment, and in hormone receptor-positive (HR+) disease, as cancer cells may proliferate under the estrogenic peak associated with stimulation. Therefore, this review aims to examine the available evidence on the safety of COS in eBC patients eligible for neoadjuvant treatment (NAT), particularly in HR+ disease. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify studies evaluating the feasibility and safety of COS in eBC and including patients referred to NAT and/or with HR+ disease. Time to NAT and survival outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: Of the three matched cohort studies assessing the impact of COS on time to start NAT, only one reported a significant small delay in the cohort undergoing COS compared with the control group, whereas the other studies found no difference. Regarding survival outcomes, overall, no increased risk of recurrence or death was found, either in patients undergoing COS in the neoadjuvant setting regardless of HR expression or in HR+ disease regardless of the timing of COS relative to surgery. However, there are no data on the safety of COS in the specific combined scenario of HR+ disease undergoing NAT. CONCLUSION: Neither the indication to NAT nor the HR positivity constitutes per se an a priori contraindication to COS. Shared decision making between clinicians and patients is essential to carefully weigh the risks and benefits in each individual case. Prospective studies designed to specifically investigate this issue are warranted.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Fertility Preservation , Humans , Female , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods , Prospective Studies , Fertility Preservation/adverse effects , Fertility Preservation/methods , Ovulation Induction/adverse effects , Ovulation Induction/methods
17.
Endocr Pract ; 30(1): 64-69, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37708997

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: In this narrative review, we discuss the current evidence as well as the knowledge gaps concerning assisted reproductive technology (ART) indications, protocols, and results in the presence of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). METHODS: An electronic literature search was performed for English-language publications in the last decade in databases such as PubMed, Medline, the Web of Sciences, Embase, and Scopus. RESULTS: We found evidence that ovarian steroidogenesis and folliculogenesis are deeply altered by PCOS; however, the oocyte quality and pregnancy rates after ART are not affected. Patients with PCOS are more sensitive to the action of exogenous gonadotropins and more likely to develop ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. This risk can be mitigated by the adoption of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocols for pituitary blockade and ovarian stimulation, along with frozen embryo transfer, without compromising the odds of achieving a live birth. Pregnancy complications, such as miscarriage, gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, and very preterm birth, are more frequent in the presence of PCOS, requiring more intense prenatal care. It remains uncertain whether weight reduction or insulin sensitizers used before ART are beneficial for the treatment outcomes. CONCLUSION: Although PCOS is not a drawback for ART treatments, the patients need special care to avoid complications. More in-depth studies are needed to uncover the mechanisms of follicular growth, gamete maturation, and endometrial differentiation during ART procedures in the presence of PCOS.


Subject(s)
Infertility, Female , Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome , Polycystic Ovary Syndrome , Premature Birth , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Polycystic Ovary Syndrome/complications , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/adverse effects , Pregnancy Rate , Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome/complications , Ovulation Induction/adverse effects , Ovulation Induction/methods , Infertility, Female/complications , Infertility, Female/therapy , Fertilization in Vitro/adverse effects , Fertilization in Vitro/methods
18.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 164(3): 843-847, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37525483

ABSTRACT

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) may be a severe complication of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation during assisted reproductive technology. During OHSS, fluid shifts from the intravascular space to the third-space compartments as the result of an increase in capillary permeability. This can cause fluid accumulation in peritoneal as well as thoracic cavities. The patient presented with symptoms of severe OHSS (bilateral hydrothorax and pulmonary effusion), requiring bilateral ultrasound-guided paracentesis and bilateral thoracentesis during her Emergency Room visits and hospitalization. Due to distant effects from the increased capillary permeability, the patient presented fluid in the middle ear, which led to the development of serous otitis media 12 days after egg retrieval. This was resolved 2-3 weeks later after being treated with antihistamines and antibiotics given by her Ear, Nose, and Throat doctor. OHSS risk may be reduced by continuous monitoring of patients undergoing ovulation induction, using an appropriate gonadotropin dosage, and using additional agents known to decrease its risk. If OHSS still occurs, symptomatic treatment and a multidisciplinary team of professionals may be needed to prevent fluid build-up complications. In contrast to many published articles about OHSS and its complications, this is the first case report of a patient presenting serous otitis media as a complication of severe OHSS.


Subject(s)
Otitis Media with Effusion , Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome , Female , Humans , Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome/complications , Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome/prevention & control , Otitis Media with Effusion/complications , Ovulation Induction/adverse effects , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/adverse effects , Peritoneum , Fertilization in Vitro/adverse effects
19.
Gynecol Endocrinol ; 39(1): 2269281, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37844908

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study is aimed to determine the efficacy of a cocktail style treatment by combining GnRH-antagonist, letrozole, and mifepristone on the prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in high-risk women. METHODS: This prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial was performed between January 2018 and December 2018. A total of 170 women who identified as high risk of OHSS during the ovarian hyperstimulation and underwent cryopreservation of whole embryos. On the day of oocyte retrieval, the combination group received 0.25 mg Cetrorelix for 3 d, 5 mg letrozole for 5 d, and 50 mg mifepristone for 3 d, the mifepristone group received 50 mg mifepristone for 3 d. A total of 156 cases were included in final analysis. All the frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles were followed up until December 2021. RESULTS: The combination group showed significantly decreased incidence of moderate and severe OHSS than mifepristone group (20.5% vs. 42.3%), with remarkably reduced serum estradiol level on hCG + 3 and + 5 d, decreased ovarian diameter, and shortened luteal phase. Oocyte retrieval number, levels of estradiol on hCG + 0 and VEGF, and ovarian diameter on hCG + 5 were associated with the severity of the symptoms. There was no significant difference in cumulative live birth rates (LBRs) between the combination and mifepristone group (74.4% vs. 76.9%). CONCLUSIONS: The combination treatment effectively reduces the incidence of moderate/severe OHSS in high-risk women.


Subject(s)
Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome , Female , Humans , Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome/complications , Letrozole/therapeutic use , Mifepristone , Fertilization in Vitro , Prospective Studies , Estradiol , Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone , Hormone Antagonists/therapeutic use , Ovulation Induction/adverse effects
20.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 290: 93-100, 2023 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37757729

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To the best of our knowledge, the available evidence on the effect and efficacy of controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) in this group of patients remains poorly reported. Concerns related to the impact of stimulation to cancer progression and recurrence, as well as the risk of disease dissemination during egg collection, might explain the aforementioned trend. METHODS: Overall, our FP Service received 192 gynaecological referrals, between 2005 and 2021, regarding gynaecologic conditions mainly cancer related. A total of 68 (35.4%) patients underwent COS. These patients were diagnosed with the following gynaecologic pathologies: 33 cases (48,5%) of cervical cancer were noted (stage 1b1-2b), 25 ovarian pathology (36.7%), 9 cases (13.2%) of endometrial cancer, and a single case of vaginal cancer (1.5%). RESULTS: The mean age of patients attending the fertility preservation service was 31.5 (std 5.8). The patients presenting to their initial appointment with a mean BMI 24.5 (IQR 6.9) and a median AFC of 12 (IQR 13). The mean duration of COS was 11 days (IQR 3), and the median dose of gonadotrophins was calculated at 300 IU (IQR 75 IU). In 95.4% of the cases, GnRH agonist was used as a trigger for final maturation. The median number of follicles measuring more than 14 mm at the time of trigger was 11 (IQR 8), whereas the median number of oocytes collected was 11 (IQR 9). The complication rate was reported at less than 2%. So far, one in four women of this FP group (17/68, 25% of the overall group) returned to our service to claim their cryopreserved eggs/embryos and successful livebirths were reported in 58.8% of this sample (10/17 cases). The mean time to return to use their oocytes/embryos was 36 months (min value 16 months - max value 85 months). There was no significant difference in mortality rate between patients who received FP vs those who did not (hazard ratio of mortality was estimated at 0.91 (p-value 0.88)). CONCLUSION: Based on our findings, ovarian stimulation for patients presenting with gynaecologic malignancy is a safe and efficient method of fertility preservation. Undoubtedly, the sample size is limited, however our results are reassuring and highlight the efficacy of COS for the purpose of FP based on data coming from the largest Assisted Conception Unit of the South-East of the UK.


Subject(s)
Fertility Preservation , Genital Neoplasms, Female , Humans , Female , Fertility Preservation/methods , Cryopreservation/methods , Oocytes/pathology , Ovulation Induction/adverse effects , Ovulation Induction/methods , Retrospective Studies , Oocyte Retrieval
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL