ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To compare the enzyme activity of different presentations of papain solution to validate in-house preparations. METHODS: Two papain solutions were prepared, and the third presentation was a commercial solution. Tests were carried out with samples of red cells typed as weak RhD. RESULTS: In-house prepared papain solutions showed similar enzyme reactivity, and statistically no differences compared to the enzyme activity of the commercial solution. CONCLUSION: Evaluating the cost-benefit ratio, the in-house prepared papain solutions present more economic advantages, and can be incorporated into immunohematological routines as a way to cope with periods of financial crisis and cost-containment policies.
Subject(s)
Erythrocytes/enzymology , Hematologic Tests/standards , Papain/chemistry , Peptide Hydrolases/chemistry , Solutions/standards , Agglutination Tests/methods , Hematologic Tests/economics , Humans , Papain/economics , Peptide Hydrolases/economics , Reproducibility of Results , Rh-Hr Blood-Group System/chemistry , Rh-Hr Blood-Group System/economics , Solutions/economics , Time FactorsABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Objective: To compare the enzyme activity of different presentations of papain solution to validate in-house preparations. Methods: Two papain solutions were prepared, and the third presentation was a commercial solution. Tests were carried out with samples of red cells typed as weak RhD. Results: In-house prepared papain solutions showed similar enzyme reactivity, and statistically no differences compared to the enzyme activity of the commercial solution. Conclusion: Evaluating the cost-benefit ratio, the in-house prepared papain solutions present more economic advantages, and can be incorporated into immunohematological routines as a way to cope with periods of financial crisis and cost-containment policies.
RESUMO Objetivo: Comparar a atividade enzimática de diferentes apresentações de solução de papaína para validação de preparados in-house. Métodos: Foram preparadas duas soluções de papaína, e a terceira apresentação tratou-se de uma solução comercial. Os testes comparativos das reações enzimáticas foram realizados com amostras de hemácias tipadas como RhD fraco. Resultados: As soluções de papaína preparadas in-house apresentaram reatividade enzimática semelhante e estatisticamente sem diferenças em comparação com a atividade enzimática da solução comercial. Conclusão: Avaliando-se a relação entre custo e benefício, as soluções de papaína preparadas in-house são economicamente vantajosas, podendo ser incorporadas às rotinas imuno-hematológicas como forma de enfrentamento em períodos de crise financeira e em políticas de retenção de gastos.
Subject(s)
Humans , Peptide Hydrolases/chemistry , Solutions/standards , Papain/chemistry , Erythrocytes/enzymology , Hematologic Tests/standards , Peptide Hydrolases/economics , Rh-Hr Blood-Group System/economics , Rh-Hr Blood-Group System/chemistry , Solutions/economics , Time Factors , Agglutination Tests/methods , Papain/economics , Reproducibility of Results , Hematologic Tests/economicsABSTRACT
Introduction. Given its efficacy and safety, NexoBrid™ (NXB) has become part of our therapeutic options in burns treatment with satisfactory results. However, no cost analysis comparing NXB to the standard of care (SOC) has been carried out as of today. Aim. To assess the cost of treatment with NXB and compare it to the SOC cost. Methods. 20 patients with 14-22% of TBSA with an intermediate-deep thermal burn related injury were retrospectively and consecutively included. 10 of these patients were treated with the SOC, while the other 10 with NXB. The cost analysis was performed in accordance with the weighted average Italian Health Ministry DRGs and with Conferenza Stato/Regioni 2003 and the study by Tan et al. For each cost, 95% confidence intervals have been evaluated. Results. Considering the 10 patients treated with NXB, the overall savings (total net saving) amounted to 53300 euros. The confidence interval analysis confirmed the savings. Discussion. As shown by our preliminary results, significant savings are obtained with the use of NXB. The limit of our study is that it is based on Italian health care costs and assesses a relative small cohort of patients. Further studies on larger multinational cohorts are warranted.
Subject(s)
Burns/economics , Burns/therapy , Debridement/economics , Peptide Hydrolases/economics , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Health Care Costs , Humans , Italy , Male , Middle Aged , Orphan Drug Production , Retrospective Studies , Young AdultSubject(s)
Amylases/economics , Drug Approval/legislation & jurisprudence , Lipase/economics , Peptide Hydrolases/economics , Prescription Fees/trends , United States Food and Drug Administration/legislation & jurisprudence , Drug Approval/economics , Drug Combinations , Health Services Accessibility/economics , Prescription Fees/statistics & numerical data , United StatesABSTRACT
Keratinases are well-recognized enzymes with the unique ability to attack highly cross-linked, recalcitrant structural proteins such as keratin. Their potential in environmental clean-up of huge amount of feather waste has been well established since long. Today, they have gained importance in various other biotechnological and pharmaceutical applications. However, commercial availability of keratinases is still limited. Hence, to attract entrepreneurs, investors and enzyme industries it is utmost important to explicitly present the market potential of keratinases through detailed account of its application sectors. Here, the application areas have been divided into three parts: the first one is dealing with the area of exclusive applications, the second emphasizes protease dominated sectors where keratinases would prove better substitutes, and the third deals with upcoming newer areas which still await practical documentation. An account of benefits of keratinase usage, existing market size, and available commercial sources and products has also been presented.
Subject(s)
Bacteria/enzymology , Bacterial Proteins/economics , Industrial Microbiology/economics , Peptide Hydrolases/economics , Bacteria/genetics , Bacterial Proteins/genetics , Bacterial Proteins/metabolism , Peptide Hydrolases/genetics , Peptide Hydrolases/metabolismSubject(s)
Celiac Disease/drug therapy , Drug Design , Drug Industry/economics , Investments , Peptide Hydrolases/therapeutic use , Celiac Disease/immunology , Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic/economics , Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic/economics , Drug Industry/trends , Humans , Peptide Hydrolases/adverse effects , Peptide Hydrolases/economics , Peptide Hydrolases/pharmacology , United StatesABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Many drugs, including serratiopeptidases, are marketed without proven efficacy in clinical trials. It is protein in nature and claimed to be effective orally. METHODS: 24 albino wistar rats, 6 each in following groups were assigned--(1) Control group (distilled water, orally) (2) Diclofenac (6.75 mg/kg, IP) (3) serratiopeptidase (5.4 mg/kg, orally) (4) Combination of serratiopeptidase (5.4 mg/kg, orally) and diclofenac (2.25 mg/kg, IP). Inflammatory agent, carrageenan (0.1 ml of 1% w/v) was injected subcutaneously in the ether anesthetized rat hind paw, half an hour after the administration of drug. Rat paw volume up to lateral malleolar process was recorded with plethysmometer at various time periods. RESULTS: Percentage formation and inhibition of oedema in serratiopeptidase or combination groups were not significantly different than control group. Both were significantly less for diclofenac group. CONCLUSION: Serratiopeptidase was not effective in this animal model of oedema/inflammation.