Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 3.217
Filter
1.
World J Urol ; 42(1): 402, 2024 Jul 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38985193

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Transperineal laser ablation (TPLA) is a new minimally-invasive surgical treatment for patients with benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). We report the perioperative and mid-term functional results of the first 100 consecutively patients undergoing TPLA at our institution. METHODS: Clinical data from consecutive patients undergoing TPLA at our institution from April 2021 to July 2023 were prospectively collected. Primary endpoints were the postoperative changes in IPSS, QoL and MSHQ 3-item questionnaires and in Qmax and post-void residual volume (PVR). RESULTS: Overall, 100 consecutive patients underwent the procedure. Median age and prostate volume were 66 (IQR 60-75) years and 50 (IQR 40-70) ml, respectively. In the cohort, 14 (14%) patients had an indwelling catheter and 81 (81%) were under oral BPO therapy at the time of TPLA. Baseline median Qmax (ml/s) and PVR (ml) were 9.1 (IQR 6.9-12) and 90 (IQR 50-150), respectively, while median IPSS and QoL were 18 (IQR 15-23) and 4 (IQR 3-4). At all the follow-up timepoints, the evaluated outcomes on both symptoms and functional parameters showed a statistically significant improvement (p < 0.001). Antegrade ejaculation was preserved in all sexually active patients. No postoperative Clavien-Dindo > 2 complications were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: TPLA represents a safe option for selected well-informed patients swith LUTS due to BPO. Our prospective study confirms the feasibility and favorable perioperative and functional outcomes in a real-world cohort with heterogenous prostate volumes and patient characteristics.


Subject(s)
Laser Therapy , Prostatic Hyperplasia , Humans , Male , Prostatic Hyperplasia/surgery , Prostatic Hyperplasia/complications , Aged , Middle Aged , Laser Therapy/methods , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Perineum/surgery , Cohort Studies
2.
Tech Coloproctol ; 28(1): 80, 2024 Jul 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38971941

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to clarify the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive transabdominal surgery (MIS) with transperineal minimal invasive surgery (tpMIS) for sacrectomy in advanced primary and recurrent pelvic malignancies. METHODS: Using a prospectively collected database, we retrospectively analyzed the clinical, surgical, and pathological outcomes of MIS with tpMIS for sacrectomies. Surgery was performed between February 2019 and May 2023. The median follow-up period was 27 months (5-46 months). RESULTS: Fifteen consecutive patients were included in this analysis. The diagnoses were as follows: recurrent rectal cancer, n = 11 (73%); primary rectal cancer, n = 3 (20%); and recurrent ovarian cancer, n = 1 (7%). Seven patients (47%) underwent pelvic exenteration with sacrectomy, six patients (40%) underwent abdominoperineal resection (APR) with sacrectomy, and two patients (13%) underwent tumor resection with sacrectomy. The median intraoperative blood loss was 235 ml (range 45-1320 ml). The postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 3a) were graded as follows: 3a, n = 6 (40%); 3b, n = 1 (7%); and ≥ 4, n = 0 (0%). Pathological examinations demonstrated that R0 was achieved in 13 patients (87%). During the follow-up period, two patients (13%) developed local re-recurrence due to recurrent cancer. The remaining 13 patients (87%) had no local disease. Fourteen patients (93%) survived. CONCLUSIONS: Although the patient cohort in this study is heterogeneous, MIS with tpMIS was associated with a very small amount of blood loss, a low incidence of severe postoperative complications, and an acceptable R0 resection rate. Further studies are needed to clarify the long-term oncological feasibility.


Subject(s)
Feasibility Studies , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Perineum , Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Retrospective Studies , Male , Perineum/surgery , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Adult , Treatment Outcome , Pelvic Neoplasms/surgery , Sacrum/surgery , Pelvic Exenteration/methods , Pelvic Exenteration/adverse effects , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Ovarian Neoplasms/surgery , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology
3.
Tech Coloproctol ; 28(1): 79, 2024 Jul 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38965146

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Perineal hernia (PH) is a late complication of abdominoperineal resection (APR) that may compromise a patient's quality of life. The frequency and risk factors for PH after robotic APR adopting recent rectal cancer treatment strategies remain unclear. METHODS: Patients who underwent robotic APR for rectal cancer between December 2011 and June 2022 were retrospectively examined. From July 2020, pelvic reinforcement procedures, such as robotic closure of the pelvic peritoneum and levator ani muscles, were performed as prophylactic procedures for PH whenever feasible. PH was diagnosed in patients with or without symptoms using computed tomography 1 year after surgery. We examined the frequency of PH, compared characteristics between patients with PH (PH+) and without PH (PH-), and identified risk factors for PH. RESULTS: We evaluated 142 patients, including 53 PH+ (37.3%) and 89 PH- (62.6%). PH+ had a significantly higher rate of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (26.4% versus 10.1%, p = 0.017) and a significantly lower rate of undergoing pelvic reinforcement procedures (1.9% versus 14.0%, p = 0.017). PH+ had a lower rate of lateral lymph node dissection (47.2% versus 61.8%, p = 0.115) and a shorter operative time (340 min versus 394 min, p = 0.110). According to multivariate analysis, the independent risk factors for PH were preoperative chemoradiotherapy, not undergoing lateral lymph node dissection, and not undergoing a pelvic reinforcement procedure. CONCLUSIONS: PH after robotic APR for rectal cancer is not a rare complication under the recent treatment strategies for rectal cancer, and performing prophylactic procedures for PH should be considered.


Subject(s)
Perineum , Postoperative Complications , Proctectomy , Rectal Neoplasms , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Robotic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Male , Female , Risk Factors , Middle Aged , Perineum/surgery , Aged , Proctectomy/adverse effects , Proctectomy/methods , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Incidence , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Hernia/etiology , Hernia/prevention & control , Hernia/epidemiology , Incisional Hernia/etiology , Incisional Hernia/prevention & control , Incisional Hernia/epidemiology
4.
Ann Plast Surg ; 93(2): 239-245, 2024 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39023410

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is a significant cause of cancer-related death in the United States with abdominoperineal resection (APR) remaining a necessary procedure for many patients. The resultant defects of this radical operation are complex and characterized by significant tissue voids. Pedicled vertical profunda artery perforator flaps (vPAP) can be used to obliterate these defects in patients receiving minimally invasive APR or when the abdominal donor site is unavailable. METHODS: After receiving local institutional review board approval, a single center, retrospective cohort study from January 2020 to December 2021 was performed assessing pedicled vPAP flap reconstruction of APR defects. Age, sex, body mass index, primary diagnosis, comorbidities, concomitant oncologic procedures, radiation, timing, incorporation of gracilis flaps, follow-up, and complications were compared. RESULTS: Ten patients (70% male) with an average age of 56.2 years and BMI of 27.6 were included in the study. Rectal adenocarcinoma (50%) was the most common indication for APR, followed by rectal squamous cell carcinoma (30%), vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (10%), and Crohn disease (10%). Eighty percent of the patients received radiation, and 70% of reconstructions were delayed after the initial resection. The average length of clinical follow-up was 26.1 months. Concerning major complications, 2 patients were required to return to the operating room due to venous congestion (20%), and 2 patients suffered partial flap failure (20%). Minor complications were perineal dehiscence (50%), abscess requiring percutaneous drainage by interventional radiology (30%), and infection requiring antibiotics (20%). Twenty percent of patients developed fistulas requiring surgical excision. There were no instances of donor site dehiscence, and there was no complete flap loss, indicating successful reconstruction in all included cases. CONCLUSIONS: vPAP flaps are a reliable method to reconstruct perineal defects with less donor-site morbidity than previous reconstructive options. vPAP flaps should be considered in the setting of delayed reconstruction, minimally invasive APRs, and when the abdominal donor site is unavailable.


Subject(s)
Perforator Flap , Perineum , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Humans , Middle Aged , Male , Female , Perforator Flap/transplantation , Perforator Flap/blood supply , Retrospective Studies , Perineum/surgery , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Aged , Adult , Proctectomy/methods , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery
5.
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi ; 27(6): 615-620, 2024 Jun 25.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38901995

ABSTRACT

Objective: To study the influence of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on peritoneal wound recovery after abdominoperineal resection (APR). Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of data of 219 patients who had been pathologically diagnosed with low rectal cancer and undergone APR in the Union Hospital of Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology between January 2018 and December 2021. Of these patients, 158 had undergone surgery without any pre-surgical treatment (surgery group), 35 had undergone surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (neoadjuvant chemotherapy group), and 26 had undergone surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy group). The primary outcome was perineal wound complications occurring within 30 days. The status of wound healing was classified into the following three levels: Level A: abnormal wound seepage that improved after wound discharge; Level B: wound infection and dehiscence; and Level C: Level B plus fever. The patients' general condition, tumor status, perianal wound healing level, and intra- and post-operative recovery were recorded. Results: None of the study patients had any complications during surgery. The duration of surgery was 240.0 (180.0-300.0) minutes, 240.0 (225.0-270.0) minutes and 270.0 (240.0-356.2) minutes in the surgery, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy groups, respectively (H=6.508, P=0.039). The rates of perineal wound complications were 34.6% (9/26) and (22.9%, 8/35)in the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy group and the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group, being significantly higher than that in the surgery group (10.1%, 16/158). After adjusting for patient age and sex using a logistic regression model, the risk of complications was still higher in the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy than in the surgery group (OR=4.6, 95%CI: 1.7-12.7; OR=2.6, 95%CI: 1.0-6.8), these differences being statistically significant (both P<0.05). The duration of hospital stay was 9.5 (7.0-12.0) days, 10.0 (8.0-17.0) days and 11.5 (9.0-19.5) days for patients in the surgery, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy groups, respectively (H=0.569, P=0.752). However, after adjusting for patient age and sex by using a generalized linear model, hospital stay was longer in the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy than in the surgery group (ß [95% CI]: 4.4 [0.5-8.4], P=0.028). After surgery, 155 of 219 patients required further adjuvant chemotherapy. A higher proportion of patients with than without wound complications did not attend for follow-up (32.2% [10/31] vs. 16.1% [20/124]); this difference is statistically significant (χ2=4.133, P=0.023). Conclusions: In patients with low rectal cancer, neoadjuvant radiotherapy may be associated with an increased risk of perineal wound infection and non-healing.


Subject(s)
Neoadjuvant Therapy , Proctectomy , Rectal Neoplasms , Wound Healing , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Male , Female , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Rectal Neoplasms/therapy , Middle Aged , Perineum/surgery , Peritoneum , Aged , Operative Time
6.
Am J Case Rep ; 25: e943305, 2024 Jun 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38867420

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND Laparoscopic-perineal neovagina construction by sigmoid colpoplasty is a popular therapeutic approach for patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome. The conventional approach requires an auxiliary abdominal incision to exteriorize the descending colon to fix the anvil for end-to-end colorectal anastomosis. We modified the natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) approach by exteriorizing the descending colon through the artificial neovaginal tunnel to replace the anvil extracorporeally, without requiring an auxiliary abdominal incision. It was a more minimally invasive technique. CASE REPORT We performed this modified laparoscopic-perineal sigmoid colpoplasty in a 26-year-old woman with MRKH syndrome. We cut off a segment of the sigmoid colon with a vascular pedicle to make a new vagina out of it, the same as in the traditional laparoscopic-perineal sigmoid colpoplasty. What is new about this technique is that it has no need for abdominal incision and is more minimally invasive. The operating time was 315 min. No postoperative complications occurred. The postoperative hospital stay was 4 days. The modified laparoscopic-perineal approach, free from an auxiliary abdominal incision, demonstrated advantages, including a shorter hospital stay, expedited recovery, and comparable anatomical outcomes, when compared with the traditional approach. This innovation improves the surgical experience for patients with MRKH syndrome, addressing the physical and psychological aspects of their condition. CONCLUSIONS This refined laparoscopic-perineal neovagina construction by sigmoid colpoplasty represents a feasible and minimally invasive technique. It is an attractive option for MRKH syndrome patients in need of vaginal reconstruction, offering a streamlined procedure with reduced postoperative recovery time and enhanced patient outcomes.


Subject(s)
46, XX Disorders of Sex Development , Colon, Sigmoid , Laparoscopy , Mullerian Ducts , Perineum , Vagina , Humans , Female , Adult , Laparoscopy/methods , Colon, Sigmoid/surgery , Vagina/surgery , Vagina/abnormalities , 46, XX Disorders of Sex Development/surgery , Mullerian Ducts/abnormalities , Mullerian Ducts/surgery , Perineum/surgery , Congenital Abnormalities/surgery , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods
7.
Curr Oncol ; 31(6): 3253-3268, 2024 Jun 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38920730

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Abdominoperineal resection (APR)-the standard surgical procedure for low-lying rectal cancer (LRC)-leads to significant perineal defects, posing considerable reconstruction challenges that, in selected cases, necessitate the use of plastic surgery techniques (flaps). PURPOSE: To develop valuable decision algorithms for choosing the appropriate surgical plan for the reconstruction of perineal defects. METHODS: Our study included 245 LRC cases treated using APR. Guided by the few available publications in the field, we have designed several personalized decisional algorithms for managing perineal defects considering the following factors: preoperative radiotherapy, intraoperative position, surgical technique, perineal defect volume, and quality of tissues and perforators. The algorithms have been improved continuously during the entire period of our study based on the immediate and remote outcomes. RESULTS: In 239 patients following APR, the direct closing procedure was performed versus 6 cases in which we used various types of flaps for perineal reconstruction. Perineal incisional hernia occurred in 12 patients (5.02%) with direct perineal wound closure versus in none of those reconstructed using flaps. CONCLUSION: The reduced rate of postoperative complications suggests the efficiency of the proposed decisional algorithms; however, more extended studies are required to categorize them as evidence-based management guide tools.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Rectal Neoplasms , Humans , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Perineum/surgery , Adult , Aged, 80 and over , Proctectomy/methods , Surgical Flaps
8.
J Robot Surg ; 18(1): 261, 2024 Jun 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38904929

ABSTRACT

This study aims to compare the perioperative, oncological, and functional outcomes of perineal hydrodissection (HD) with standard treatment (ST) in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. We performed an exhaustive search in databases such as PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, seeking English-language studies relevant to our research question, with a cutoff date of April 2024. The pooled results were assessed using the weighted mean differences (WMDs), standardized mean differences (SMDs), and odds ratios (ORs) metrics. We also performed a sensitivity analysis. The meta-analysis was conducted utilizing Stata/MP version 18 software. The study was registered with PROSPERO (ID: CRD 42024536400). We included a total of five studies (three RCTs and two retrospective studies). According to the data from the Meta-analysis, the HD group showed positive effects in promoting urinary continence (OR 2.64, 95% CI 1.36, 5.12; p = 0.004 < 0.05) and erectile function (SMD 0.92, 95%CI 0.56, 1.27; p < 0.05) within 3 months after surgery. However, no notable disparities were observed in terms of operative time, estimated blood loss, bilateral nerve-sparing rate, or the rate of positive surgical margin. Perineal hydrodissection can be safely applied in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), offering a distinct advantage in functional outcomes compared to those who undergo standard robot-assisted prostatectomy alone.


Subject(s)
Perineum , Prostatectomy , Prostatic Neoplasms , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Humans , Prostatectomy/methods , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Male , Perineum/surgery , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Urinary Incontinence/etiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology
9.
Tech Coloproctol ; 28(1): 70, 2024 Jun 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38907171

ABSTRACT

Four patients with rectal cancer required reconstruction of a defect of the posterior vaginal wall. All patients received neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy, followed by an en bloc (abdomino)perineal resection of the rectum and posterior vaginal wall. The extent of the vaginal defect necessitated closure using a tissue flap with skin island. The gluteal turnover flap was used for this purpose as an alternative to conventional more invasive myocutaneous flaps (gracilis, gluteus, or rectus abdominis). The gluteal turnover flap was created through a curved incision at a maximum width of 2.5 cm from the edge of the perineal wound, thereby creating a half-moon shape skin island. The subcutaneous fat was dissected toward the gluteal muscle, and the gluteal fascia was incised. Thereafter, the flap was rotated into the defect and the skin island was sutured into the vaginal wall defect. The contralateral subcutaneous fat was mobilized for perineal closure in the midline, after which no donor site was visible.The duration of surgery varied from 77 to 392 min, and the hospital stay ranged between 3 and 16 days. A perineal wound dehiscence occurred in two patients, requiring an additional VY gluteal plasty in one patient. Complete vaginal and perineal wound healing was achieved in all patients. The gluteal turnover flap is a promising least invasive technique to reconstruct posterior vaginal wall defects after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer.


Subject(s)
Plastic Surgery Procedures , Rectal Neoplasms , Surgical Flaps , Vagina , Humans , Female , Vagina/surgery , Buttocks/surgery , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Middle Aged , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Aged , Perineum/surgery , Operative Time , Treatment Outcome
10.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 24(1): 439, 2024 Jun 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38914976

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Perineal lacerations are a very common complication of post-partum. Usually, the repair of 1st and 2nd-grade lacerations is performed after the administration of local anesthesia. Despite the great relevance of the problem, there are only a few studies about the best choice of local anesthetic to use during suturing. We performed a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the use of a local anesthetic spray during the suturing of perineal lacerations in the post-partum. METHODS: We compared the spray with the standard technique, which involves the infiltration of lacerated tissues, using the NRS scale. 136 eligible women who had given birth at University Hospital of Udine were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive nebulization of Lidocaine hydrochloride 10% spray (experimental group) or subcutaneous/submucosal infiltration of mepivacaine hydrochloride (control group) during suturing of perineal laceration. RESULTS: The lacerations included 84 1st-grade perineal traumas (61.7%) and 52 2nd-grade perineal traumas (38.2%). All the procedures were successfully completed without severe complications or serious adverse reactions. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of blood losses or total procedure time. Moreover, there were no statistically significant differences in terms of NRS to none of the intervals considered. Regarding the application of the spray in the B group, in 36 cases (52.9%) it was necessary to improve the number of puffs previously supposed to be sufficient (5 puffs). Just in 3 cases, an additional injection was necessary (4.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that lidocaine spray alone can be used as a first line of local anesthetic during the closure of I-II-grade perineal lacerations, as it has comparable efficacy to mepivacaine infiltration. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was recorded on https://clinicaltrials.gov . Identification number: NCT05201313. First registration date: 21/01/2022. Unique Protocol ID: 0042698/P/GEN/ARCS.


Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Local , Lacerations , Lidocaine , Mepivacaine , Perineum , Suture Techniques , Humans , Female , Perineum/injuries , Perineum/surgery , Lidocaine/administration & dosage , Lacerations/surgery , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Adult , Mepivacaine/administration & dosage , Pregnancy , Treatment Outcome
11.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg ; 95: 17-20, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38865839

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The epidemiology, care, and outcomes of perineal and genital burns (PG) in high-income countries have been previously described, but an analysis of this topic in LMICs has yet to be performed. We use the World Health Organization's Global Burn Registry to fill this gap. METHODS: The GBR was searched from inception to November 2023 to identify all burn patients, excluding cases from high-income countries. Demographics and mechanism of injury were retrieved. Primary outcomes were length of hospital stay (LOHS), surgical intervention, discharge with physical impairment, and mortality. A multivariate regression analysis was performed controlling for burnt total body surface area (TBSA), age, sex, inhalation injury, mechanism of burn and care center characteristics. RESULTS: Of 9041 patients identified, 1213 (13.4 %) had PG burns with 136 (1.6 %) isolated to the PG region. PG patients had higher TBSA (p < 0.001) and more inhalation injury (p < 0.001). They had better access to rehabilitation and lower access to theater space for burns (p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that PG patients had longer LOHS (p = 0.001), greater mortality (p < 0.001), were less likely to undergo surgery (p = 0.01) or be discharged home with physical impairment (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Similarities and differences exist between high- and low/middle-income countries in terms of the patterns of injury, care, and recovery in patients with PG burns. The longer LOHS and higher mortality among PG patients, previously reported in high-income countries, are verified. This highlights the importance of greater vigilance when caring for such patients.


Subject(s)
Burns , Developing Countries , Length of Stay , Perineum , Registries , Humans , Burns/epidemiology , Burns/therapy , Male , Female , Adult , Perineum/injuries , Perineum/surgery , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Genitalia/injuries , Young Adult , Adolescent , Global Health , Child
12.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg ; 93: 163-169, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38696870

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Abdominoperineal resection (APR) leads to a substantial loss of tissue and a high rate of complications. The Taylor flap is a musculocutaneous flap used in reconstruction after APR. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to analyze the short and long-term morbidity of reconstruction with a Taylor flap (oblique rectus abdominis flap) after APR and to identify the risk factors for postoperative complications. METHODS: We retrospectively included all patients who had undergone APR with immediate reconstruction with a Taylor flap in our department between July 2000 and June 2018. Demographics, oncological data, treatment, and short- and long-term morbidity were reviewed. RESULTS: Among the 140 patients included, we identified early minor complications in 42 patients (30%) and 14 early major complications (10%). Total necrosis of the flap requiring its removal occurred in four patients (2.8%). Eleven patients (7.9%) presented with a midline incision hernia, and seven (5%) presented with a subcostal incision hernia. No perineal hernia was found. No risk factors for the complications were identified. CONCLUSION: The Taylor flap is a safe procedure with few complications and limited donor site morbidity. Moreover, it prevents perineal hernias. These results confirm that the Taylor flap is a well-suited procedure for reconstruction after APR.


Subject(s)
Perineum , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Postoperative Complications , Proctectomy , Rectus Abdominis , Humans , Male , Female , Retrospective Studies , Proctectomy/methods , Proctectomy/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Perineum/surgery , Middle Aged , Aged , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Plastic Surgery Procedures/adverse effects , Rectus Abdominis/transplantation , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Adult , Risk Factors , Aged, 80 and over , Myocutaneous Flap/transplantation , Surgical Flaps
13.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 35(8): 1187-1193, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38705571

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the durability, effectiveness, and safety of transperineal laser ablation (TPLA) of the prostate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) underwent TPLA with a 1,064-nm continuous-wave diode laser. International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL), postvoid residual (PVR), and prostate volume were evaluated at baseline and successive timepoints. RESULTS: Forty prospectively enrolled patients had follow-up of ≥36 months; median duration of follow-up was 57 months (range, 36-76 months). Compared with baseline, the median reduction in IPSS at 12-month follow-up was 74% (interquartile range [IQR], 60%-81%) (P < .001). Median QoL score at 12 months was improved from 5 (IQR, 4-5) at baseline to 1 (IQR, 0-1) (P < .001). Median PVR at 12 months decreased from 108 mL (IQR, 38-178 mL) to 13.5 mL (IQR, 0-40.5 mL) (P < .001), a median reduction of 88% (IQR, 61%-100%). At 12 months, median prostate volume was significantly reduced from 66 mL (IQR, 48.5-86.5 mL) to 46 mL (IQR, 36-65 mL) (P < .001), a median reduction of 32% (IQR, 21%-45%). For all of these parameters, the benefit of TPLA persisted at last follow-up, and all changes were statistically significant compared with baseline. There were no intraprocedural adverse events; periprocedural adverse events consisted of 1 case of prostatitis and 1 case of urinary tract infection (both Society of Interventional Radiology [SIR] Grade I). CONCLUSIONS: TPLA for symptomatic BPH produced durable benefits across a range of clinical outcomes and was well tolerated in follow-up at median duration of 57 months.


Subject(s)
Laser Therapy , Prostatic Hyperplasia , Quality of Life , Humans , Male , Prostatic Hyperplasia/surgery , Prostatic Hyperplasia/diagnostic imaging , Prostatic Hyperplasia/physiopathology , Aged , Treatment Outcome , Laser Therapy/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Time Factors , Lasers, Semiconductor/therapeutic use , Lasers, Semiconductor/adverse effects , Follow-Up Studies , Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms/etiology , Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms/physiopathology , Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms/surgery , Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms/diagnostic imaging , Perineum/surgery , Aged, 80 and over
14.
Chirurgia (Bucur) ; 119(2): 125-135, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38743827

ABSTRACT

In this editorial, the authors bring to the attention of surgeons a personal point of view with the intention of offering a series of anatomical arguments to explain the high rate of functional complications following ultralow rectal resections, resections dominated by faecal incontinence of various intensities. Having as a starting point the anatomy of the pelvic floor and the posterior perineum, the authors are concerned with the functional outcomes of the sphincter-saving anterior rectal resection, regarding the low and ultralow resection. Technically, a conservative surgery for low rectal cancer has been currently performed. If 25 years ago the abdominoperineal resection was the gold standard for rectal cancer located under 7cm from the anal verge, nowadays the preservation of the anal canal as a partner for colon anastomosis has been accomplished. Progressively, from a desire to preserve the normal passage of stool into the anal canal, as anatomically and physiologically as possible, the distal limit of resection was lowered to 2-4 cm from the anal verge and ultra-low anastomoses were created, within the anal sphincter complex. The stated goal: keep the oncological safety standard and, at the same time, avoid definitive colostomy. Starting from the normal anatomy of the pelvic floor and the anorectal segment, the authors take a look at the alterations of the visceral, muscular, and nerve structures as a consequence of the low anterior resection and, particularly, the ultralow anterior resection. A significant degree of functional outcomes regarding defecation, with the onset of marked disabilities of anal continence, the major consequence being anal incontinence (30-70%), have been noticed. The authors go under review for the main anatomical and physiological changes that accompany anterior rectal resection. Conclusions: Thus, the following questions arise: what is the lower limit of resection to avoid total fecal incontinence? Is total incontinence a greater handicap than colostomy or is it not? The answers cannot be supported by solid arguments at this time, but the need to initiate future studies dedicated to this problem emerges.


Subject(s)
Anal Canal , Fecal Incontinence , Pelvic Floor , Proctectomy , Rectal Neoplasms , Humans , Fecal Incontinence/etiology , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Proctectomy/methods , Proctectomy/adverse effects , Anal Canal/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Syndrome , Pelvic Floor/surgery , Anastomosis, Surgical/methods , Perineum/surgery , Rectum/surgery , Risk Factors , Low Anterior Resection Syndrome
15.
BMC Surg ; 24(1): 163, 2024 May 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38769559

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Abdominal perineal resection (APR) of rectal cancer, also known as Mile's procedure, is a classic procedure for the treatment of rectal cancer. Through the improvement of surgical skills and neoadjuvant therapy, the sphincter-preserving rate in rectal cancer patients has improved, even in patients with ultralow rectal cancer who underwent APR in the past. However, APR cannot be completely replaced by low anterior resection (LAR) in reality. APR still has its indications, when the tumor affects the external sphincter, etc. Good perineal exposure in APR is difficult and can seriously affect surgical safety and the long-term prognosis. METHODS: We reviewed the records of 16 consecutive patients with rectal cancer who underwent APR at Anqing Municipal Hospital from January 2022 to April 2023, including 11 males and 5 females, with an average age of 64.8 ± 10.3 years. The perineal operation was completed with the Lone-Star® retractor-assisted (LSRA) exposure method. After incising the skin and subcutaneous tissue, a Lone-Star® retractor was placed, and the incision was retracted in surrounding directions with 8 small retractors, which facilitated the freeing of deep tissues. We dynamically adjusted the retractor according to the plane to fully expose the surgical field. RESULTS: All 16 patients underwent laparoscopic-assisted APR successfully. Thirteen procedures were performed independently by a single person, and the others were completed by two persons due to intraoperative arterial hemostasis. All specimens were free of perforation and had a negative circumferential resection margin (CRM). Postoperative complications occurred in 4 patients, including urinary retention in 1 patient, pulmonary infection in 1 patient, intestinal adhesion in 1 patient and peristomal dermatitis in 1 patient, and were graded as ClavienDindo grade 3 or lower and cured. No distant metastasis or local recurrence was found for any of the patients in the postoperative follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The application of the LSRA exposure method might be helpful for perineal exposure during APR for rectal cancer, which could improve intraoperative safety and surgical efficiency, achieve one-person operation, and increase the comfort of operators.


Subject(s)
Laparoscopy , Perineum , Proctectomy , Rectal Neoplasms , Humans , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Perineum/surgery , Laparoscopy/methods , Aged , Proctectomy/methods , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
16.
BMC Pediatr ; 24(1): 307, 2024 May 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38711038

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Anorectal malformation is a common congenital problem occurring in 1 in 5,000 births and has a spectrum of anatomical presentations, requiring individualized surgical treatments for normal growth. Delayed extubation or reintubation may result in a longer intensive care unit (ICU) stay and hospital stay, increased mortality, prolonged duration of mechanical ventilation, increased tracheostomy rate, and higher hospital costs. Extensive studies have focused on the role of risk factors in early extubation during major infant surgery such as Cardiac surgery, neurosurgery, and liver surgery. However, no study has mentioned the influencing factors of delayed extubation in neonates and infants undergoing angioplasty surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of neonates and infants who underwent anorectal malformation surgery between June 2018 and June 2022. The principal goal of this study was to observe the incidence of delayed extubation in pediatric anorectal malformation surgery. The secondary goals were to identify the factors associated with delayed extubation in these infants. RESULTS: We collected data describing 123 patients who had anorectal malformations from 2019 to 2022. It shows that 74(60.2%) in the normal intubation group and 49(39.8%) in the longer extubation. In the final model, anesthesia methods were independently associated with delayed extubation (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: We found that the anesthesia method was independently associated with early extubation in neonates and infants who accepted pediatric anorectal malformation surgery.


Subject(s)
Airway Extubation , Anorectal Malformations , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Female , Male , Infant, Newborn , Infant , Time Factors , Anorectal Malformations/surgery , Perineum/surgery
18.
Tech Coloproctol ; 28(1): 51, 2024 Apr 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38684547

ABSTRACT

Endometriosis is a benign gynecologic affection that may lead to major surgeries, such as colorectal resections. Rectovaginal fistulas (RVF) are among the possible complications. When they occur, it is necessary to adapt the repair surgery as best as possible to limit their functional consequences. This video shows three different techniques for correcting RVF after rectal resection for endometriosis, with a combination of perineal surgery and laparoscopy: a mucosal flap, a transanal transection and single stapled anastomosis (TTSS) and a pull through. Supplementary file1 (MP4 469658 KB).


Subject(s)
Endometriosis , Laparoscopy , Rectovaginal Fistula , Humans , Female , Rectovaginal Fistula/surgery , Rectovaginal Fistula/etiology , Endometriosis/surgery , Laparoscopy/methods , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Proctectomy/adverse effects , Proctectomy/methods , Rectum/surgery , Anastomosis, Surgical/adverse effects , Anastomosis, Surgical/methods , Surgical Flaps , Perineum/surgery , Adult
20.
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL