[Contribution of physical and rehabilitation medicine to primary care medicine]. / Apport de la médecine physique et de réadaptation à la médecine de premier recours.

Physical and rehabilitation medicine (PRM) is an independent medical specialty, little known in Switzerland. This specialty, strongly linked to the holistic approach of the International Classification of Functioning, will be increasingly solicited by the epidemiology of disability and the imperatives of "ageing better". Its skills in prescribing human and material resources for rehabilitation provide added value in terms of loss of autonomy. Based on a biopsychosocial model, PRM has a high role to play in prevention and primary healthcare, as well as in the management and prevention of the consequences of functionally limiting diseases. There are, however, financial (pricing) and demographic (lack of representation) obstacles to effective action on behalf of the population and the healthcare system.

La médecine physique et de réadaptation (MPR), discipline indépendante, est peu connue en Suisse. Cette spécialité, liée à l'approche holistique de la classification internationale du fonctionnement, sera de plus en plus sollicitée par l'épidémiologie du handicap et les impératifs du « vieillir mieux ¼. Ses compétences de prescription des moyens humains et matériels en réadaptation apportent une plus-value sur la perte d'autonomie. Basée sur un modèle biopsychosocial, la MPR trouve sa place dans la prévention et les soins de santé primaires ainsi que dans la prise en charge et la prévention des conséquences des maladies induisant une limitation fonctionnelle. Il existe toutefois des obstacles financiers (tarification) et démographiques (insuffisance de représentation) pour une action efficace au service de la population et du système de santé.

[Annual progress in pulmonary rehabilitation 2023].

Pulmonary rehabilitation is a key component of long-term management strategies for chronic respiratory diseases (CRD). This comprehensive intervention, carefully tailored to individual patients based on thorough assessments, has undergone significant expansion and refinement toward personalization and precision in recent years. This review consolidates findings from studies published between October 2022 and September 2023, covering advances in CRD rehabilitation, assessment criteria, mechanisms, and innovative equipments. The primary objective is to enhance the knowledge base of healthcare professionals and pave the way for future research efforts in this important area.

A Scoping Review of Registered Clinical Studies on Management of Individuals With Acute Spinal Cord Injury (2000-2020): Trends and Characteristics of the Research Initiatives.

ABSTRACT: This scoping review examined the current trends and characteristics of the clinical research initiatives on the management of acute spinal cord injury. This review included all clinical studies on the acute treatment of spinal cord injury that were registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov website from February 2000 to December 2020. The search strategy combined the terms "acute spinal cord injury" and "treatment." There has been a gradual increase in the number of registered clinical studies on acute treatment of spinal cord injury over the past two decades. Of the 116 studies, there were 103 interventional studies, 12 observational studies, and 1 registry. While 115 clinical studies recruited male and female participants, most of the registered clinical studies included only adults with an upper age limit after spinal cord injury. Most of the registered clinical studies were interventional studies led by single institutions in North America (n = 70), Europe (n = 29), and Asia (n = 15). Most of the research initiatives were interventional studies on new therapies for management of individuals with spinal cord injury (n = 91). In conclusion, the results of this scoping review suggest that although there has been an increase in the amount and diversity of the research initiatives on treatment of acute spinal cord injury over the past two decades, their generalizability remains relatively limited.

Update in Disaster Rehabilitation: An International Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Perspective.

ABSTRACT: Disasters (both natural and man-made) are escalating worldwide, resulting in a significant increase in survivors with complex and long-term disabling injuries. Physical and rehabilitation medicine is integral in disaster management and should be included in all phases of the disaster management continuum, which comprise mitigation/prevention, preparation, response, and recovery phases. This Joel A. DeLisa Lecture was presented on February 11, 2021, at the Association of Academic Physiatrists Annual Scientific Meeting-"Physiatry 21." The lecture highlights the synergistic position of the International Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine and the Disaster Rehabilitation Committee, to provide crucial leadership and governance role in liaison and coordination with the World Health Organization (and other stakeholders), to provide rehabilitation input during future disasters.

Factors Influencing Fellowship Decision Making During Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Residency.

ABSTRACT: Previous surveys have demonstrated an increasing trend among graduating physiatry residents who desired to pursue a subspecialty fellowship. There has been sparse information on whether residents start their training with a subspecialty interest in mind and what factors influenced them to choose a fellowship. This article describes a prospective survey in the 2019-2020 academic year in which 175 responses were collected representing 65 (78.3%) of the 83 physical medicine and rehabilitation programs with graduating residents. Nearly 3 in 4 (73.7%, 129/175) reported matching into a fellowship, and among those, 79.8% (103/129) had matched into a pain, spine, or sports medicine fellowship. At the start of residency, 62.3% (109/175) were planning to pursue a fellowship, with 54.9% (96/175) planning to focus on either pain, sports, or spine medicine. Most respondents (72.2%) did not change their initial subspecialty focus during their residency training. Forty-six percent agreed that their anticipated subspecialty influenced their choice of residency program. The results of this survey demonstrate that most graduating residents are matriculating into fellowship training with pain, spine, and/or sports medicine being among the top choices. These results underscore the importance of subspecialty interests of trainees at the start of their residency and how training may influence their subspecialty interest.

Implementation and Patient Satisfaction of Telemedicine in Spine Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Patients During the COVID-19 Shutdown.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to investigate the implementation and patient satisfaction of telemedicine visits in a physical medicine and rehabilitation spine practice during COVID-19. DESIGN: This is a prospective cohort study. RESULTS: Of 172 patients, 97.6% were very satisfied or satisfied (83.7% of the patients were very satisfied) with their telemedicine appointment. In 44.4% of the cases, the physical medicine and rehabilitation physician prescribed medication to the patient, and in 21.6% of the cases, either an injection or radiofrequency ablation was ordered. Most patients (87%) did not have any issues during their encounter. Lastly, 64.5% of the patients preferred telemedicine over in-person appointments, whereas 56.1% of the patients who are 60 yrs and older responded the same. A total of 67.4% of those who had a follow-up visit would choose telemedicine over in-person. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study show that telemedicine can provide very effective and satisfactory care in a physical medicine and rehabilitation spine practice. This was especially notable with follow-up visits where imaging and treatment plan can easily be discussed over telemedicine. Stay-at-home orders and improved reimbursement during the COVID-19 pandemic have spurred adoption of telemedicine with high patient satisfaction. We hope that physical medicine and rehabilitation physicians will be able to continue expanding patient access in the postpandemic world.

[Innovations in physical and rehabilitation medicine]. / Innovations en médecine physique et réadaptation.

Over the last decade, Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (PRM) is a medical specialty that has evolved considerably in the various fields that concern it : from the management of low back pain and lumbosciatalgia or osteoporosis in a multidisciplinary manner, through the use of new technologies in neuro-locomotor rehabilitation and robotisation in amputee patients for example, the development of regenerative medicine and prevention in sports traumatology and, finally, the progress of electrophysiology techniques for the diagnosis of small-fibre neuropathies. These various advances will be discussed in this article.

Au cours de la dernière décennie, la Médecine Physique et Réadaptation (MPR) est une spécialité médicale qui a fortement évolué dans les différents domaines qui la concernent : de la prise en charge des lombalgies et lombosciatalgies ou encore de l'ostéoporose de manière pluridisciplinaire, en passant par l'utilisation des nouvelles technologies en rééducation neuro-locomotrice et de la robotisation en rééducation, chez les patients amputés par exemple, le développement de la médecine à vocation régénérative et la prévention en traumatologie du sport et, enfin, les progrès des techniques d'électrophysiologie pour le diagnostic des neuropathies à petites fibres. Ces différentes avancées seront abordées dans cet article.

EURO-MUSCULUS/USPRM Global Report on Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Publications.

The developments in technology have improved access to the use of musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) in different clinical settings. Accordingly, MSUS has been applied to a wide range of musculoskeletal problems including inflammatory and degenerative diseases, sport injuries, and regional pain syndromes both for clinical practice and research. In this report, the authors aimed to globally examine the publications on MSUS among different specialties, countries, and topics. Sixteen reviewers under the umbrella of the European Musculoskeletal Ultrasonography Society Group and the Ultrasound Study Group of International Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine have evaluated approximately 15,000 publications on MSUS. The authors believe that the results of this comparative analysis may provide a holistic snapshot with regard to the utility of MSUS, not only for clinicians/academicians but also for the industry. Accordingly, while aiming to further increase their awareness, this article would possibly guide future investments as well.

AANEM survey of training in electrodiagnostic medicine in U.S. residency programs.

BACKGROUND: Little literature exists describing resident training in peripheral electrodiagnosis (EDX). METHODS: U.S. residency programs in neurology and physical medicine and rehabilitation (PM&R) were surveyed by the AANEM (American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine) on specific features of EDX training. RESULTS: Ninety-seven programs responded to the survey. Training duration was 4-8 weeks in most neurology programs; training averaged 22 weeks in PM&R programs. EDX experience was required in all PM&R and in 90% of neurology programs. Results varied greatly for the residency years of training, pulling of residents for other responsibilities, participation in continuity clinics, number of teaching physicians, number of needle examinations performed, organization of nerve conduction training, written/oral examinations, muscle/nerve biopsy reviews, and training materials. CONCLUSIONS: This survey demonstrated large variability in training of neurology and PM&R residents in peripheral EDX.

Physical Rehabilitation Needs Per Condition Type: Results From the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017.

OBJECTIVE: To determine how total physical rehabilitation needs have been distributed per relevant condition groups (musculoskeletal and pain, neurologic cardiothoracic, neoplasms, pediatric, human immunodeficiency virus [HIV] related), globally and across countries of varying income level. DESIGN: Subgroup, secondary analyses of data from the Global Burden of Disease 2017. Data for the year 2017 are used for determining current needs and data from every year between 1990 and 2017 for determining changing trends. SETTINGS: Globally and high-, upper-middle-, lower-middle-, and low-income countries. PARTICIPANTS: Not applicable. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Years lived with disability (YLD) rates per 100,000 people for the 6 condition groups. RESULTS: In 2017, musculoskeletal and pain conditions accounted for 52.6% of the total physical rehabilitation needs worldwide, :HIV related for 5.7% of the physical rehabilitation needs in low-income nations, but about 1% in all other locations. Worldwide, significant increases in YLD rates were observed since 1990 for the 6 condition groups (P<.01). However, across country types, we observed significant decreases in YLD rates for specific conditions: pediatric in high-income countries, and neurologic and neoplasm conditions in low-income countries (P<.01). In upper-middle-income countries, YLD rates from neurologic and neoplasm conditions grew exponentially since 1990, with overall increases of 67% and 130%, respectively. CONCLUSION: At a global scale, physical rehabilitation needs per capita are growing for all major condition groups, with musculoskeletal and pain conditions currently accounting for over half of those needs. Countries of varying income level have different typologies and evolutionary trends in their rehabilitation needs.

Burnout among specialists and trainees in physical medicine and rehabilitation: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: Burnout, a state of emotional exhaustion related to work or patient-care activities, is prevalent in all stages of medical training and clinical practice. The syndrome has serious consequences, including medical errors, poorer quality of care, substance abuse, and suicide. The aim of this study is to evaluate the prevalence of burnout in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (PMandR) specialists and trainees. METHODS: Systematic literature searches were conducted in MEDLINE, CINAHL and EMBASE for peer-reviewed articles in English before March 2019 about the prevalence of burnout amongst PMandR specialists and trainees. RESULTS: This systematic review yielded 359 results. Of these, 33 full-text records were reviewed; 5 met the inclusion criteria: 3 surveys of PMandR specialists and 2 of PMandR residents (total n?=?1,886 physicians; year of publication 20122019). Data extracted included prevalence and severity of burnout and, if available, risk or protective factors. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics. Incidence of burnout ranged from 22.2% to 83.3% in trainees and 48% to 62% in specialists. Organizational and system challenges were the primary risk factors for burnout amongst specialists. CONCLUSION: Emerging evidence positions physicians in PMandR among the most likely to experience burnout. Although there is limited literature regarding PMandR specialists and trainees, the available evidence suggests that more than half of physicians in PMandR experience burnout.