Preventing Pneumonia in High-risk Patients After Esophageal Cancer Surgery: Mini-tracheostomy and Tazobactam/Piperacillin.

BACKGROUND/AIM: We evaluated the usefulness of prophylactic mini-tracheostomy (PMT) and perioperative administration of tazobactam/piperacillin (TAZ/PIPC) in high-risk patients after esophagectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively studied 89 consecutive high-risk patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer between January 2013 and December 2021. We defined patients with two or more of the following factors as high risk: age ≥70 years, performance status ≥1, respiratory dysfunction, liver dysfunction, cardiac dysfunction, renal dysfunction, diabetes mellitus, albumin <3.5 g/dl, and Brinkman index >600. Standard management was administered to the first 50 patients (standard group). PMT and TAZ/PIPC were administered to the next 39 patients (combination group). Patient characteristics and short-term outcomes were compared before and after propensity-score matching. RESULTS: Before propensity-score matching, 24-hour urine creatinine clearance, retrosternal route, 3-field lymph node dissection, and open abdominal approach were more common, postoperative pneumonia (13% vs. 36%, p=0.045) and complications of grade ≥3b (2.6% vs. 22%, p=0.01) were less frequent, and the postoperative hospital stay was shorter (median: 23 vs. 28 days, p=0.022) in the combination group than in the standard group. In propensity-score matching, patient characteristics, except for 24-h creatinine clearance and reconstructive route, were matched for 23 paired patients. Postoperative pneumonia (8.7% vs. 39%, p=0.035) and complications of grade ≥3b (0% vs. 26%, p=0.022) were less frequent and postoperative hospital stay was shorter (median: 22 vs. 25 days, p=0.021) in the combination group than in the standard group. CONCLUSION: PMT with TAZ/PIPC can potentially prevent postoperative pneumonia in high-risk patients after esophagectomy.

Piperacillin/tazobactam for surgical prophylaxis during pancreatoduodenectomy: meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatoduodenectomy is associated with an increased incidence of surgical-site infections, often leading to a significant rise in morbidity and mortality. This trend underlines the inadequacy of traditional antibiotic prophylaxis strategies. Hence, the aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the outcomes of antimicrobial prophylaxis, comparing piperacillin/tazobactam with traditional antibiotics. METHODS: Upon registering in PROSPERO, the international prospective register of systematic reviews (CRD42023479100), a systematic search of various databases was conducted over the interval 2000-2023. This inclusive search encompassed a wide range of study types, including prospective and retrospective cohorts and RCTs. The subsequent data analysis was carried out utilizing RevMan 5.4. RESULTS: A total of eight studies involving 2382 patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy and received either piperacillin/tazobactam (1196 patients) or traditional antibiotics (1186 patients) as antibiotic prophylaxis during surgery were included in the meta-analysis. Patients in the piperacillin/tazobactam group had significantly reduced incidences of surgical-site infections (OR 0.43 (95% c.i. 0.30 to 0.62); P < 0.00001) and major surgical complications (Clavien-Dindo grade greater than or equal to III) (OR 0.61 (95% c.i. 0.45 to 0.81); P = 0.0008). Subgroup analysis of surgical-site infections highlighted significantly reduced incidences of superficial surgical-site infections (OR 0.34 (95% c.i. 0.14 to 0.84); P = 0.02) and organ/space surgical-site infections (OR 0.47 (95% c.i. 0.28 to 0.78); P = 0.004) in the piperacillin/tazobactam group. Further, the analysis demonstrated significantly lower incidences of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistulas (grades B and C) (OR 0.67 (95% c.i. 0.53 to 0.83); P = 0.0003) and mortality (OR 0.51 (95% c.i. 0.28 to 0.91); P = 0.02) in the piperacillin/tazobactam group. CONCLUSION: Piperacillin/tazobactam as antimicrobial prophylaxis significantly lowers the risk of postoperative surgical-site infections, major surgical complications (complications classified as Clavien-Dindo grade greater than or equal to III), clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistulas (grades B and C), and mortality, hence supporting the implementation of piperacillin/tazobactam for surgical prophylaxis in current practice.

Piperacillin/tazobactam-induced sudden severe thrombocytopenia in a patient with a pressure ulcer: a case report.

The standard treatment for an infected pressure ulcer (PU) with osteomyelitis is debridement, wound coverage and antibiotic administration. However, systemic administration of antibiotics in patients with osteomyelitis is controversial, and the optimal treatment duration for chronic osteomyelitis has not been standardised. We report a case of sudden severe thrombocytopenia induced by piperacillin/tazobactam (PIPC/TAZ) in a patient with PU-related osteomyelitis. A 57-year-old male patient with paraplegia, using a wheelchair full-time, presented to our plastic surgery department with infection of a stage IV hard-to-heal ischial PU. We surgically debrided the necrotising tissue and raised an ipsilateral biceps femoris musculocutaneous propeller flap for wound coverage. Polymicrobial infections, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa, were detected in the bone biopsy sample; therefore, systemic PIPC/TAZ was administered for the osteomyelitis. Unexpectedly, during the next 12 days of antibiotic administration, the patient's platelet count acutely dropped to 1×103/µl over three days. Based on a series of examinations, PIPC/TAZ was suspected to be the most likely cause of the severe thrombocytopenia. After drug discontinuation, the thrombocytopenia gradually improved. PIPC/TAZ is one of the most widely used antibiotic combinations in the plastic surgery field; it is conventionally administered for hard-to-heal wounds such as PUs and diabetic foot. The present case suggests that surgeons must take special precautions for patients undergoing PIPC/TAZ treatment. In this report, PIPC/TAZ-induced thrombocytopenia and the efficacy of antibiotic treatment for PU-related osteomyelitis are discussed in light of the available literature.

A targeted likelihood estimation comparing cefepime and piperacillin/tazobactam in critically ill patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).

Cefepime and piperacillin/tazobactam are antimicrobials recommended by IDSA/ATS guidelines for the empirical management of patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Concerns have been raised about which should be used in clinical practice. This study aims to compare the effect of cefepime and piperacillin/tazobactam in critically ill CAP patients through a targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE). A total of 2026 ICU-admitted patients with CAP were included. Among them, (47%) presented respiratory failure, and (27%) developed septic shock. A total of (68%) received cefepime and (32%) piperacillin/tazobactam-based treatment. After running the TMLE, we found that cefepime and piperacillin/tazobactam-based treatments have comparable 28-day, hospital, and ICU mortality. Additionally, age, PTT, serum potassium and temperature were associated with preferring cefepime over piperacillin/tazobactam (OR 1.14 95% CI [1.01-1.27], p = 0.03), (OR 1.14 95% CI [1.03-1.26], p = 0.009), (OR 1.1 95% CI [1.01-1.22], p = 0.039) and (OR 1.13 95% CI [1.03-1.24], p = 0.014)]. Our study found a similar mortality rate among ICU-admitted CAP patients treated with cefepime and piperacillin/tazobactam. Clinicians may consider factors such as availability and safety profiles when making treatment decisions.

Mortality of Patients With Sepsis Administered Piperacillin-Tazobactam vs Cefepime.

Importance: Experimental and observational studies have suggested that empirical treatment for bacterial sepsis with antianaerobic antibiotics (eg, piperacillin-tazobactam) is associated with adverse outcomes compared with anaerobe-sparing antibiotics (eg, cefepime). However, a recent pragmatic clinical trial of piperacillin-tazobactam and cefepime showed no difference in short-term outcomes at 14 days. Further studies are needed to help clarify the empirical use of these agents. Objective: To examine the use of piperacillin-tazobactam compared with cefepime in 90-day mortality in patients treated empirically for sepsis, using instrumental variable analysis of a 15-month piperacillin-tazobactam shortage. Design, Setting, and Participants: In a retrospective cohort study, hospital admissions at the University of Michigan from July 1, 2014, to December 31, 2018, including a piperacillin-tazobactam shortage period from June 12, 2015, to September 18, 2016, were examined. Adult patients with suspected sepsis treated with vancomycin and either piperacillin-tazobactam or cefepime for conditions with presumed equipoise between piperacillin-tazobactam and cefepime were included in the study. Data analysis was conducted from December 17, 2022, to April 11, 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was 90-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included organ failure-free, ventilator-free, and vasopressor-free days. The 15-month piperacillin-tazobactam shortage period was used as an instrumental variable for unmeasured confounding in antibiotic selection. Results: Among 7569 patients (4174 men [55%]; median age, 63 [IQR 52-73] years) with sepsis meeting study eligibility, 4523 were treated with vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam and 3046 were treated with vancomycin and cefepime. Of patients who received piperacillin-tazobactam, only 152 (3%) received it during the shortage. Treatment groups did not differ significantly in age, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, or time to antibiotic administration. In an instrumental variable analysis, piperacillin-tazobactam was associated with an absolute mortality increase of 5.0% at 90 days (95% CI, 1.9%-8.1%) and 2.1 (95% CI, 1.4-2.7) fewer organ failure-free days, 1.1 (95% CI, 0.57-1.62) fewer ventilator-free days, and 1.5 (95% CI, 1.01-2.01) fewer vasopressor-free days. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with suspected sepsis and no clear indication for antianaerobic coverage, administration of piperacillin-tazobactam was associated with higher mortality and increased duration of organ dysfunction compared with cefepime. These findings suggest that the widespread use of empirical antianaerobic antibiotics in sepsis may be harmful.

Possible impact of revisions in disc diffusion breakpoints for aminoglycosides and piperacillin/tazobactam in the 33rd edition of CLSI M100 document on clinical reporting and use in Indian settings with low susceptibility.

PURPOSE: The study explores the impact of significant interpretative breakpoint changes for aminoglycosides and piperacillin-tazobactam in Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, considering PK/PD, clinical data, and susceptibility on clinical reporting and use. PROCEDURE: Between January 2021 and June 2023, a total of 189,583 samples were processed for bacterial pathogens and antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using disc diffusion method/VITEK® 2 Compact system/broth microdilution. WHONET software was utilised to capture and analyse the changes in the interpretation of disc diffusion method, following updates to CLSI M100 documents in comparison to previous editions. Antimicrobial consumption data was collected and interpreted as DDD/100 bed days using AMC tool software. Here, we present data for 13,615 members of Order Enterobacterales and 1793 Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates. FINDING: Enterobacterales exhibited a significant susceptibility drop of 14.7% for gentamicin and 21.7% for amikacin. Pseudomonas aeruginosa showed an increase in isolates with intermediate tobramycin susceptibility, from 0.6% to 29.7%, with relatively minor changes in piperacillin-tazobactam interpretation. CONCLUSION: The changes indicate a shift toward increased 'resistance' and 'intermediate susceptibility' for these antibiotics, emphasizing the need for cautious use and leveraging PK/PD knowledge for improved antibiotic utilization, patient outcomes, and antimicrobial stewardship.

Clinical outcomes in patients with piperacillin/tazobactam-non-susceptible but ceftriaxone-susceptible E. coli or K. pneumoniae bloodstream infection.

BACKGROUND: A small proportion of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae demonstrate in vitro non-susceptibility to piperacillin/tazobactam but retain susceptibility to ceftriaxone. Uncertainty remains regarding how best to treat these isolates. OBJECTIVES: We sought to compare clinical outcomes between patients with piperacillin/tazobactam-non-susceptible but ceftriaxone-susceptible E. coli or K. pneumoniae bloodstream infection receiving definitive therapy with ceftriaxone versus an alternative effective antibiotic. METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients with a positive blood culture for piperacillin/tazobactam-non-susceptible but ceftriaxone-susceptible E. coli or K. pneumoniae between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2022. Patients were divided into one of two definitive treatment groups: ceftriaxone or alternative effective antibiotic. Our primary outcome was a composite of 90 day all-cause mortality, hospital readmission, or recurrence of infection. We used Cox proportional hazards models to compare time with the composite outcome between groups. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were included in our analysis. Overall, median age was 63 years (IQR 49.5-71.0), the most common source of infection was intra-abdominal (25/62; 40.3%) and the median total duration of therapy was 12.0 days (IQR 9.0-16.8). A total of 9/22 (40.9%) patients in the ceftriaxone treatment group and 18/40 (45.0%) patients in the alternative effective antibiotic group met the composite endpoint. In an adjusted time-to-event analysis, there was no difference in the composite endpoint between groups (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.30-1.50). The adjusted Bayesian posterior probability that the HR was less than or equal to 1 (i.e. ceftriaxone is as good or better than alternative therapy) was 85%. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that ceftriaxone can be used to effectively treat bloodstream infections with E. coli or K. pneumoniae that are non-susceptible to piperacillin/tazobactam but susceptible to ceftriaxone.

Comparing cefazolin/ metronidazole, piperacillin-tazobactam, or c efoxitin as surgical antibiotic prophylaxis in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative antibiotic options for pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) include cefoxitin (CX), piperacillin-tazobactam (PT), or combined cefazolin and metronidazole (CM). Recent studies suggest the superiority of PT over CX, but evidence for CM is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To explore the impact of preoperative antibiotic selection (CM vs. PT and CX vs. PT) on the development of surgical site infections (SSI). METHODS: Consecutive adult patients at one institution who underwent PD from November 2017 to December 2021 and received either CM, PT, or CX preoperatively, were included. The primary outcome was SSI. Secondary outcomes included postoperative infections and clinically significant postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). Logistic regression models were used. RESULTS: Among 127 patients included in the study, PT, CM, and CX were administered in 46 (36.2%), 44 (34.6%), and 37 (29.4%) patients, respectively. There were 32 (27.1%) SSI, 20 (36.1%) infections, and 21 (22.9%) POPF events. PT use was associated with reduced risk of SSI compared to CX (OR: 0.32, 95% CI: 0.11-0.89, p = 0.03), but there was no difference as compared to CM (OR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.27-2.13, p = 0.59). There were no differences in secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: PT reduced SSI rates compared to CX but was no different to CM among patients undergoing PD at our center.

The Impact of Antibiotic Strategy on Outcomes in Surgically Managed Necrotizing Enterocolitis.

BACKGROUND: We sought to evaluate postoperative antibiotic practices in a large population of patients with necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and determine whether any regimens were associated with better outcomes. METHODS: The Pediatric Health Information Systems (PHIS) database was queried to identify patients who underwent an intestinal resection for acute NEC between July, 2016 and June, 2021. Data regarding post-resection antibiotic therapy, cutaneous or intraabdominal infection, and fungal or antibiotic-resistant infection were collected. RESULTS: 130 infants at 38 children's hospitals met inclusion criteria. Postoperative antibiotics were administered for a median of 13 days. The most frequently used antibiotics were vancomycin and piperacillin/tazobactam. Antibiotic duration greater than five days was not associated with a lower incidence of infection. No antibiotic was associated with a lower incidence of any of the complications assessed, although ampicillin was associated with more infections, overall. The incidence of fungal infection and treatment with a parenteral anti-fungal medication was greater with vancomycin. No antibiotic combination was used enough to be assessed. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of antibiotics for more than five days after resection for NEC was not associated with better infectious outcomes and no single antibiotic demonstrated superior efficacy. Consistent with prior studies, fungal infections were more frequent with vancomycin. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective database study, level 3B. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Refractory pneumonia caused by Prevotella heparinolytica: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Prevotella heparinolytica is a Gram-negative bacterium that is commonly found in the oral, intestinal, and urinary tracts. It has been extensively studied in lower respiratory tract infections in horses, which has heparinolytic activity and can secrete heparinase and further induces virulence factors in cells and causes disease. However, no such cases have been reported in humans. CASE PRESENTATION: A 58-year-old male patient from China presented to the respiratory clinic in Suzhou with a productive cough producing white sputum for 20 days and fever for 3 days. Prior to this visit, a chest computed tomography scan was conducted, which revealed multiple patchy nodular opacities in both lungs. On admission, the patient presented with a temperature of 38.1 °C and a pulse rate of 110 beats per minute. Despite routine anti-infective treatment with moxifloxacin, his temperature fluctuated and the treatment was ineffective. The patient was diagnosed with Prevotella heparinolytica infection through metagenomic next-generation sequencing. Therefore, the antibiotics were switched to piperacillin-tazobactam in combination with ornidazole, which alleviated his symptoms; 1 week after discharge, the patient returned to the clinic for a follow-up chest computed tomography, and the opacities on the lungs continued to be absorbed. CONCLUSION: Prevotella heparinolytica is an opportunistic pathogen. However, it has not been reported in human pneumonia. In refractory pneumonia, measures such as metagenomic next-generation sequencing can be used to identify pathogens and help guide antibiotic selection and early support.

Nationwide genome surveillance of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Japan.

Japan is a country with an approximate 10% prevalence rate of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA). Currently, a comprehensive overview of the genotype and phenotype patterns of CRPA in Japan is lacking. Herein, we conducted genome sequencing and quantitative antimicrobial susceptibility testing for 382 meropenem-resistant CRPA isolates that were collected from 78 hospitals across Japan from 2019 to 2020. CRPA exhibited susceptibility rates of 52.9%, 26.4%, and 88.0% against piperacillin-tazobactam, ciprofloxacin, and amikacin, respectively, whereas 27.7% of CRPA isolates was classified as difficult-to-treat resistance P. aeruginosa. Of the 148 sequence types detected, ST274 (9.7%) was predominant, followed by ST235 (7.6%). The proportion of urine isolates in ST235 was higher than that in other STs (P = 0.0056, χ2 test). Only 4.1% of CRPA isolates carried the carbapenemase genes: blaGES (2) and blaIMP (13). One ST235 isolate carried the novel blaIMP variant blaIMP-98 in the chromosome. Regarding chromosomal mutations, 87.1% of CRPA isolates possessed inactivating or other resistance mutations in oprD, and 28.8% showed mutations in the regulatory genes (mexR, nalC, and nalD) for the MexAB-OprM efflux pump. Additionally, 4.7% of CRPA isolates carried a resistance mutation in the PBP3-encoding gene ftsI. The findings from this study and other surveillance studies collectively demonstrate that CRPA exhibits marked genetic diversity and that its multidrug resistance in Japan is less prevailed than in other regions. This study contributes a valuable data set that addresses a gap in genotype/phenotype information regarding CRPA in the Asia-Pacific region, where the epidemiological background markedly differs between regions.

Effect modification of dosing strategy (AUC or trough) on AKI associated with vancomycin in combination with piperacillin/tazobactam or cefepime and meropenem.

Piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP), cefepime (FEP), or meropenem (MEM) and vancomycin (VAN) are commonly used in combination for sepsis. Studies have shown an increased risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) with TZP and VAN compared to FEP or MEM. VAN guidelines recommend area under the curve (AUC) monitoring over trough (Tr) to minimize the risk of AKI. We investigated the association of AKI and MAKE-30 with the two VAN monitoring strategies when used in combination with TZP or FEP/MEM. Adult patients between 2015 and 2019 with VAN > 72 hours were included. Patients with AKI prior to or within 48 hours of VAN or baseline CrCl of ≤30 mL/min were excluded. Four cohorts were defined: FEP/MEM/Tr, FEP/MEM/AUC, TZP/Tr, and TZP/AUC. A Cox Proportional Hazard Model was used to model AKI as a function of the incidence rate of at-risk days, testing monitoring strategy as a treatment effect modification. Multivariable logistic regression was used to model MAKE-30. Overall incidence of AKI was 18.6%; FEP/MEM/Tr = 115 (14.6%), FEP/MEM/AUC = 52 (14.9%), TZP/Tr = 189 (26%), and TZP/AUC = 96 (17.1%) (P < 0.001). Both drug group [(TZP; P = 0.0085)] and monitoring strategy [(Tr; P = 0.0007)] were highly associated with the development of AKI; however, the effect was not modified with interaction term [(TZP*Tr); 0.085)]. The odds of developing MAKE-30 were not different between any group and FEP/MEM/AUC. The effect of VAN/TZP on the development of AKI was not modified by the VAN monitoring strategy (AUC vs trough). MAKE-30 outcomes were not different among the four cohorts.

Is the fluoroquinolone combination necessary for empirical antibiotic regimen in severe community-acquired pneumonia?

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess whether superior clinical outcomes can be attained through piperacillin/tazobactam (TZP)+fluoroquinolone (FQ) combination therapy for severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) compared to TZP monotherapy. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Korea. Adult inpatients diagnosed with pneumonia within 48 hours of hospitalization were included. Severe CAP was defined as a CURB-65 score of ≥ 3 or based on the 2007 guidelines of the Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society (IDSA/ATS) definition. Only patients who received either TZP and FQ combination or TZP as initial empirical therapy were included. RESULTS: The final analysis included 145 patients; 57.9% received combination therapy and 42.1% received monotherapy. In the combination therapy group, body mass index (20.67 ± 3.28 vs. 22.26 ± 4.80, p = 0.030) and asthma prevalence (0 vs. 8.3%, p = 0.022) were significantly higher; initial symptoms, clinical severity, and causative pathogens were not significantly different between groups. White blood cell counts (12,641.64 ± 6,544.66 vs. 12,491.67 ± 10,528.24, p = 0.008), and C-reactive protein levels (18.78 ± 11.47 vs. 26.58 ± 14.97, p < 0.001) were significantly higher in the combination therapy group. Clinical outcomes, including all-cause in-hospital mortality rate (26.2 vs. 33.3%, p = 0.358), were not significantly different between the groups. Multivariate analysis identified no significant association between FQ combination and all-cause in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSION: In patients with severe CAP, there were no differences in the clinical outcomes, including mortality, between the TZP and FQ combination therapy and TZP monotherapy. FQ combination was not significantly associated with in-hospital mortality.

Empirical carbapenems or piperacillin/tazobactam for infections in intensive care: An international retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Critically ill patients in intensive care units (ICU) are frequently administered broad-spectrum antibiotics (e.g., carbapenems or piperacillin/tazobactam) for suspected or confirmed infections. This retrospective cohort study aimed to describe the use of carbapenems and piperacillin/tazobactam in two international, prospectively collected datasets. METHODS: We conducted a post hoc analysis of data from the "Adjunctive Glucocorticoid Therapy in Patients with Septic Shock" (ADRENAL) trial (n = 3713) and the "Antimicrobial de-escalation in the critically ill patient and assessment of clinical cure" (DIANA) study (n = 1488). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients receiving initial antibiotic treatment with carbapenems and piperacillin/tazobactam. Secondary outcomes included mortality, days alive and out of ICU and ICU length of stay at 28 days. RESULTS: In the ADRENAL trial, carbapenems were used in 648 out of 3713 (17%), whereas piperacillin/tazobactam was used in 1804 out of 3713 (49%) participants. In the DIANA study, carbapenems were used in 380 out of 1480 (26%), while piperacillin/tazobactam was used in 433 out of 1488 (29%) participants. Mortality at 28 days was 23% for patients receiving carbapenems and 24% for those receiving piperacillin/tazobactam in ADRENAL and 23% and 19%, respectively, in DIANA. We noted variations in secondary outcomes; in DIANA, patients receiving carbapenems had a median of 13 days alive and out of ICU compared with 18 days among those receiving piperacillin/tazobactam. In ADRENAL, the median hospital length of stay was 27 days for patients receiving carbapenems and 21 days for those receiving piperacillin/tazobactam. CONCLUSIONS: In this post hoc analysis of ICU patients with infections, we found widespread initial use of carbapenems and piperacillin/tazobactam in international ICUs, with the latter being more frequently used. Randomized clinical trials are needed to assess if the observed variations in outcomes may be drug-related effects or due to confounders.

Meropenem versus piperacillin-tazobactam for the treatment of pancreatic necrosis.

PURPOSE: To date, there are three published guidelines discussing management of infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN) with conflicting recommendations. Specifically, The World Society of Emergency Surgery lists piperacillin-tazobactam as a treatment option in addition to meropenem and ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole. Piperacillin-tazobactam may serve as an effective carbapenem-sparing alternative. Although previous studies shed light on antimicrobial penetration data, there is a lack of clinical data comparing piperacillin-tazobactam to meropenem. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of meropenem and piperacillin-tazobactam for the treatment of IPN. METHODS: This was a multicenter, retrospective cohort study conducted across three institutions. Patients with IPN who received either meropenem or piperacillin-tazobactam from January 2015 to December 2020 were included. The primary composite outcome was the incidence of 90-day clinical failure, which encompassed 90-day all-cause mortality and 90-day intra-abdominal infection recurrence. Secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay, antimicrobial duration of therapy, and the need for surgical intervention. RESULTS: We identified 229 patients with IPN that received either meropenem or piperacillin-tazobactam during hospital admission. After screening, 63 patients were included in the study. Incidence of 90-day clinical failure was observed in 33 % of the meropenem group and 50 % in the piperacillin-tazobactam group (OR, 1.98; 95 % CI 0.57 to 7.01, p = 0.259). The meropenem group had a lower incidence of 90-day infection recurrence in the piperacillin-tazobactam group (56 % vs 29 %, p = 0.047). CONCLUSIONS: Piperacillin-tazobactam may be an efficacious carbapenem-sparing treatment alternative for infected pancreatic necrosis.

Frequency of drug-resistant bacterial isolates among pregnant women with UTI in maternity and children's hospital, Bisha, Saudi Arabia.

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are one of the most prevalent bacterial infections affecting humans, with a higher incidence among women. Pregnant women are at an increased risk of developing UTIs, which can have detrimental consequences for both the mother and fetus. UTIs can be caused by various bacteria, and the prevalence of drug-resistant UTIs in maternity and children's hospitals is a cause for concern due to the potential for severe complications if left untreated. The primary objective of the current study was to determine the distribution of UTI-causing bacteria and investigate the antibiotic sensitivity patterns of isolated cultures obtained from pregnant women with UTIs at the Maternity and Children's Hospital, Bisha, Saudi Arabia. This cross-sectional study was conducted from October 2021 to October 2023, involving the analysis of urine samples collected from 321 participants who acquired UTIs during pregnancy. Using biochemical tests and standard cultures, the urine samples were examined for pathogenic bacteria and their anti-microbial sensitivity patterns. The study analyzed susceptibility results according to the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines (M100, 28th Edition, 2018). Bacterial strains demonstrating resistance to three or more antibiotics were classified as multidrug-resistant (MDR). This study revealed the distribution of UTI-causing bacteria to be as follows: Escherichia coli, 57.01%; Klebsiella pneumoniae, 24.61%; Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 4.36%; Proteus mirabilis and Enterobacter cloacae, 3.74%; Streptococcus agalactiae, 3.11%; Enterococcus faecalis, 2.18%; and Staphylococcus aureus, 1.24%. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing varied among gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. Gentamicin demonstrated the highest sensitivity among both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria; piperacillin-tazobactam was the second most effective drug against gram-negative bacteria. The bacterial isolates showed varying susceptibility to different antibiotics, with Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa being mainly sensitive to gentamicin, piperacillin-tazobactam, and ciprofloxacin, respectively. The strategies for reducing the risk of UTIs need to be improved to limit the spread of MDR bacteria. These strategies may include promoting hygienic practices and administering appropriate antibiotics to prevent the emergence and spread of drug-resistant bacteria. Further research is required to monitor the trends in antibiotic resistance among UTI-causing bacteria and develop effective strategies for managing this public health menace.

Antibiotic Treatment in Complicated Appendicitis: Can It Be Optimized?

BACKGROUND: The management of complicated appendicitis is inconclusive. Guidelines have not been established for the use of personalized antibiotic treatment. OBJECTIVES: To investigate specific risk factors to consider during the initial first-choice antibiotic therapy in children with complicated appendicitis. METHODS: This study included all pediatric patients younger than 18 years of age who underwent a laparoscopic appendectomy during 2012-2022 at a single tertiary medical center. RESULTS: In total, 300 pediatric patients underwent laparoscopic appendectomy due to complicated appendicitis. The patients were treated with ceftriaxone + metronidazole (CM). For 57 (19%) patients, the empirical treatment was changed to tazobactam/piperacillin (TP) due to resistant bacteria or clinical deterioration. The presence of generalized peritonitis during surgery and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels above 20 mg/L at admission were identified as risk factors for changing the antibiotic regimen from CM to TP. CONCLUSIONS: Generalized peritonitis and CRP > 20 gr/L were highly correlated with changing the antibiotic regimen to TP. For such patients, initial treatment with TP may result in clinical improvement and shorter hospitalization.