Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 1.593
Filter
2.
BMC Anesthesiol ; 24(1): 361, 2024 Oct 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39379852

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Nosocomial infections pose a global health threat, with Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP) emerging as a prominent hospital-acquired infection, particularly in intensive care units (ICU).VAP is the commonest form of pneumonia in ICUs, contributing significantly to morbidity and mortality rates, which can reach around 30%. Despite the substantial impact of VAP on healthcare, there is a lack of data on adherence to VAP prevention protocols in our hospital. Consequently, this study aims to assess the adherence to ventilator-associated pneumonia care bundles in critical care units at a comprehensive specialized hospital in northwest Ethiopia. METHODS: A hospital-based prospective observational study was conducted from July 3, 2022, to January 7, 2024. All adult patients who were on mechanical ventilators for more than 48 h during the study period were included. Data were collected using the Institute of Healthcare Improvement VAP prevention standards as checklists via direct observation and chart review. The data were entered and analyzed using SPSS version 20. RESULTS: A total of 300 surgical and medical ICU patients were observed. Among the patients, 66.3% were from the medical ICU. In terms of admission reasons, 22.3%, 15.7% and, 12% were attributed to infections excluding respiratory origin, respiratory disorders, and other causes, respectively. The rate of compliance with all components of the bundle was 70%. A 100% adherence rate was observed for the prophylaxis for peptic ulcer and deep vein thrombosis (DVT). The lowest adherence rate was observed in the practice of oral hygiene with 0.5% chlorhexidine solution (0%) followed by humidification with heat and moisture exchangers (23.3%). Endotracheal tube cuff pressure measurement and use of endotracheal tubes with subglottic suction were not applicable. CONCLUSION: The study revealed suboptimal compliance with the VAP care bundle, indicating unsatisfactory overall practice. Specific attention is warranted for subglottic suction, cuff pressure measurement, humidification, oral care with chlorhexidine, and sedation vacation.


Subject(s)
Guideline Adherence , Intensive Care Units , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated , Humans , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/epidemiology , Ethiopia/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Adult , Aged , Hospitals, Special
3.
Crit Care Nurs Q ; 47(4): 335-345, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39265114

ABSTRACT

Caring for patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) creates competing priorities of interventions for nurses and other health care providers. Oral care might be prioritized lower; however, its neglect may lead to sequelae such as extended time in the ICU, nosocomial diseases most notably ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), or oral problems. Safe patient care depends on effective and efficient oral care. The aim of this study was to lower the incidence of VAP and maintain oral health through implementing an "oral care bundle" for mechanically ventilated (MV) patients. Using a quasi-experimental design, we divided 82 adult MV patients in the ICUs of a university-based hospital in Egypt into a control group (n = 41) that received the standard of care and a bundle group (n = 41) that received an "oral care bundle." The results of the study reported a significantly lower incidence of VAP in the intervention group (P = .015). It can be concluded that there is a significant relationship between receiving an oral care bundle and improved oral health and a reduction in the VAP rate among MV patients. This highlights the need to incorporate the oral care bundle in the daily nursing care for MV patients.


Subject(s)
Intensive Care Units , Oral Health , Oral Hygiene , Patient Care Bundles , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated , Respiration, Artificial , Humans , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/epidemiology , Male , Female , Egypt/epidemiology , Oral Hygiene/nursing , Respiration, Artificial/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Adult , Incidence , Critical Care Nursing
4.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 103(38): e39750, 2024 Sep 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39312345

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is the second most prevalent nosocomial infection in emergency care settings. An emerging strategy to reduce this risk involves coating endotracheal tubes (ETTs) with noble elements, leveraging the antimicrobial properties of elements such as silver, gold, and palladium. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of noble element coatings on ETTs in reducing VAP incidence rates, mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, and length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: Adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a comprehensive search was conducted across 5 databases up to 2024. The quality of the randomized controlled trials was assessed using the updated Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB) 2 tool. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software. Statistical heterogeneity among the studies was evaluated using the Higgins I2 value, with P < .05 indicating statistical significance. RESULTS: Seven randomized controlled trials from 5 countries were identified. Four studies had some concerns regarding bias, 2 had a high RoB, and 1 had a low RoB. Noble metal-coated ETTs resulted in a lower incidence of VAP compared to noncoated ETTs (relative risk, 0.76 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.60-0.96]). However, there was no significant difference in mortality rates (relative risk, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.93-1.20]), duration of mechanical ventilation (mean difference, -0.10 [95% CI, -1.62 to 1.41]), and ICU stay (mean difference, 0.07 [95% CI, -1.98 to 2.12]). CONCLUSION: Noble metal-coated ETTs effectively reduce the incidence of VAP but do not significantly impact mortality rates, the duration of mechanical ventilation, or ICU stay. Therefore, these coated ETTs should be integrated into a holistic care plan addressing all aspects of patient management in emergency care settings.


Subject(s)
Intubation, Intratracheal , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/epidemiology , Humans , Intubation, Intratracheal/instrumentation , Intubation, Intratracheal/adverse effects , Respiration, Artificial/adverse effects , Respiration, Artificial/instrumentation , Length of Stay , Incidence , Intensive Care Units
5.
Crit Care ; 28(1): 309, 2024 Sep 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39289732

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate whether endotracheal tubes (ETTs) with a metal coating reduce the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) compared to uncoated ETTs. METHODS: An extensive literature review was conducted to find studies that compared metal-coated ETT with uncoated ETT across four databases: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. The search parameters were set from the inception of each database until June 2024. The primary outcome measures were the rates of VAP and hospital mortality. Two independent researchers carried out the literature selection, data extraction, and quality evaluation. Data analysis was performed with RevMan 5.4.1. Furthermore, a Deeks funnel plot was used to evaluate potential publication bias in the studies included. RESULTS: Following the screening process, five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) encompassing a total of 2157 patients were identified. In terms of the primary outcome, the VAP incidence was found to be lower in the group utilizing metal-coated ETT compared to those with uncoated ETT, demonstrating a statistically significant difference [RR = 0.71, 95% CI (0.54-0.95), P = 0.02]. No notable difference in mortality rates was observed between the two groups [RR = 1.05, 95% CI (0.86-1.27), P = 0.65]. Concerning secondary outcomes, two studies were evaluated to compare the mechanical ventilation duration (RR = 0.60, 95% CI (- 0.52, 1.72), P = 0.29, I2 = 97%) and intensive care unit (ICU) stay for both patient groups (RR = 0.47, 95% CI (- 1.02, 1.95), P = 0.54, I2 = 50%). Due to the marked heterogeneity, a comparison of mechanical ventilation length between the two patient groups was not feasible. However, both studies suggested no significant difference in ventilation duration between patients using metal-coated ETT and those with uncoated ETT. CONCLUSIONS: Metal-coated ETT show a lower occurrence of VAP compared to the uncoated ETT. Nevertheless, they do not considerably decrease the length of mechanical ventilation, the duration of ICU admission, nor do they reduce hospital mortality rates. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ , identifier CRD42024560618.


Subject(s)
Intubation, Intratracheal , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated , Humans , Intubation, Intratracheal/instrumentation , Intubation, Intratracheal/methods , Intubation, Intratracheal/adverse effects , Metals , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/prevention & control
6.
BMC Pulm Med ; 24(1): 462, 2024 Sep 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39300424

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Mechanical ventilation is crucial for patient management in intensive care units, but it comes with complications such as pressure ulcers and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). The impact of head-of-bed elevation angles on these complications remains a critical area for investigation. METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis followed PRISMA guidelines and involved searches across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, conducted on September 19, 2023, with no date or language restrictions. We included randomized controlled trials that compared different head-of-bed elevation angles in adult ICU patients on mechanical ventilation. Data were extracted on study characteristics, quality assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool, and statistical analyses performed using chi-square tests for heterogeneity and fixed or random-effects models based on heterogeneity results. RESULTS: Six studies met inclusion criteria out of an initial 601 articles. These studies showed minimal heterogeneity (I2 = 0.0% for pressure ulcers, p = 0.930; and for VAP, p = 0.797), supporting the use of fixed-effect models. Results indicated that a higher elevation angle (45°) significantly increased the risk of pressure ulcers (OR = 1.95, 95% CI: 1.12-3.37, p < 0.05) and decreased the incidence of VAP compared to a lower angle (30°) (OR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.31-0.84, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: While higher head-of-bed elevation can reduce the risk of VAP in mechanically ventilated patients, it may increase the risk of pressure ulcers. Clinical strategies should carefully balance these outcomes to optimize patient care in ICU settings. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO 2024 CRD42024570232.


Subject(s)
Intensive Care Units , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated , Pressure Ulcer , Respiration, Artificial , Humans , Pressure Ulcer/etiology , Pressure Ulcer/prevention & control , Pressure Ulcer/epidemiology , Respiration, Artificial/adverse effects , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/etiology , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/prevention & control , Beds , Patient Positioning/adverse effects , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
7.
Rev. Ciênc. Plur ; 10(2): 31059, 29 ago. 2024. ilus, tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS, BBO - Dentistry | ID: biblio-1570424

ABSTRACT

Introdução: a Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica é a mais importante e comum infecção que acomete os pacientes em ventilação mecânica. Além disso, é considerada um grave problema de saúde hospitalar, com preocupantestaxas de morbimortalidade.Objetivo: investigar na literatura quais as principais ações de enfermagem para a prevenção da Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica. Metodologia:trata-se de um estudo do tipo revisão integrativa da literatura. Após utilizar a estratégia PICO, definiu-se a seguinte pergunta norteadora: "Quais as principais intervenções de enfermagem para a prevenção da Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica?". Com a leitura e aplicação dos critérios de seleção, foram utilizados nove artigos. Resultados:as principais intervenções de enfermagem descritas foram elevação da cabeceira entre 30-45 graus, manter pressão do cuff entre 20 e 30 cmH2O, higienização oral com clorexidina 0,12%, higienização das mãos, aspiração de secreções e interrupção diária da sedação. Com relação à adesão dos profissionais, a maioria das intervenções atingiram de 50% a 70% de adesão.Conclusão:as principais medidas preventivas constantes na literatura são utilizadas na prática clínica pelos enfermeiros, e estes demonstram boa adesão sobre os cuidados imprescindíveis para a prevenção da Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica (AU).


Introduction:Ventilator-AssociatedPneumoniais the most important and common infection that affects patients on mechanical ventilation. Furthermore, it is considered a serious hospital health problem,with worrying morbidity and mortality rates.Objective:to investigate in the literature which are the main nursing actions for the prevention of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia. Methodology:this is an integrative literature review study. After using the PICO strategy, the following guiding questionwas defined: "What are the main nursing interventions for preventingVentilator-Associated Pneumonia?". After reading and applying the selection criteria, nine articles were used. Results:the main nursing interventions described were elevation of the headboardbetween 30-45 degrees, maintaining cuff pressure between 20 and 30 cmH2O, oral hygiene with 0.12%chlorhexidine, hand hygiene, suctionof secretions and daily interruption of sedation. Regarding professional adherence, most interventions reached 50% to 70% adherence. Conclusion:the main preventive measures listed in the literature are used in clinical practice by nurses,and they demonstrate good adherence to essential care for the prevention of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (AU).


Introducción:la Neumonía Asociada a Ventilación Mecánica es la infección más importante y común que afecta a los pacientes que recibenventilación mecánica. Asimismo, se considera un grave problema de salud hospitalaria,con preocupantes tasas de morbimortalidad.Objetivo: investigar en la literatura cuáles son las principales acciones de enfermería para la prevención de la Neumonía Asociada a Ventilación Mecánica. Metodología:se trata de un estudio de revisión integrativade la literatura. Después de utilizar la estrategia PICO, se definió la siguiente pregunta orientadora: "¿Cuáles son las principales intervenciones de enfermería para la prevención de la Neumonía Asociada a Ventilación Mecánica?".Luegode la lectura y aplicación de los criterios de selección, se utilizaron nueve artículos. Resultados:las principales intervenciones de enfermería descritas fueron elevarla cabeceraentre 30-45 grados, mantenerla presión del manguito entre 20 y 30 cmH2O, higiene bucal conclorhexidina al 0,12%, higiene de manos, aspiración de secreciones e interrupción diaria de la sedación.En cuanto a la adherencia profesional, la mayoría de las intervenciones alcanzaron entre un 50% y un70% de adherencia. Conclusión:las principales medidas preventivas contenidas en la literatura son utilizadas en la práctica clínica por los enfermeros,y muestran una buena adherencia a los cuidados esenciales para la prevención de la Neumonía Asociada a Ventilación Mecánica (AU).


Subject(s)
Humans , Primary Nursing , Ventilation , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/prevention & control , Nursing Care , Respiration, Artificial , Delivery of Health Care
9.
Biomed Pharmacother ; 178: 117224, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39084079

ABSTRACT

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a common healthcare-acquired infection often arising during artificial ventilation using endotracheal intubation (ETT), which offers a platform for bacterial colonization and biofilm development. In particular, the effects of prolonged COVID-19 on the respiratory system. Herein, we developed an antimicrobial coating (FK-MEM@CMCO-CS) capable of visualizing pH changes based on bacterial infection and releasing meropenem (MEM) and FK13-a1 in a controlled manner. Using a simple dip-coating process with controlled loading, chitosan was cross-linked with sodium carboxymethyl cellulose oxidation (CMCO) and coated onto PVC-based ETT to form a hydrogel coating. Subsequently, the coated segments were immersed in an indicator solution containing bromothymol blue (BTB), MEM, and FK13-a1 to fabricate the FK-MEM@CMCO-CS coating. In vitro studies have shown that MEM and FK13-a1 can be released from coatings in a pH-responsive manner. Moreover, anti-biofilm and antibacterial adhesion results showed that FK-MEM@CMCO-CS coating significantly inhibited biofilm formation and prevented their colonization of the coating surface. In the VAP rat model, the coating inhibited bacterial growth, reduced lung inflammation, and had good biocompatibility. The coating can be applied to the entire ETT and has the potential for industrial production.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Biofilms , Hydrogels , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated , Animals , Hydrogels/chemistry , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/chemistry , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/microbiology , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/prevention & control , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Biofilms/drug effects , Biofilms/growth & development , Rats , Chitosan/chemistry , Chitosan/pharmacology , Male , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Carboxymethylcellulose Sodium/chemistry , Carboxymethylcellulose Sodium/pharmacology , Humans , Coated Materials, Biocompatible/pharmacology , Coated Materials, Biocompatible/chemistry
10.
Saudi Med J ; 45(7): 724-730, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38955441

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluated the home healthcare efficacy in managing tracheostomy patients at King Abdulaziz Medical City under the Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs. Home healthcare is care provided to patients in the convenience of their homes to ensure high-quality care based on healthcare providers' supervision. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study utilizing a non-probability consecutive sampling technique, including all available tracheal patients with no exclusion criteria, was carried out in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, between January 2019 and June 2022. The collected data included patient demographic variables and respiratory settings (ventilation type, daily ventilation need, tracheostomy duration, and ventilator settings). The outcomes included mortality rate and therapeutic outcomes of tracheal management. RESULTS: Of the 183 patients in the study, the most common type of respiratory-related infection was pneumonia (53%). Unlike respiratory-related causes, The mortality rate of patients admitted to the intensive care unit that was unrelated to respiratory causes was statistically significant (57%) (p=0.003). The mortality rate of patients who used aerosol tracheal collars (34%) was markedly higher than mechanically ventilated patients (57%) (p=0.004). The mortality rate following discharge from HHC was 40%, and was higher among patients aged >70 years (47%) (p=0.04). CONCLUSION: Pneumonia was associated with the majority of ventilator-related infections and resulted in hospital readmissions. Ensuring proper practices and caregiver education is crucial to decrease the incidence of ventilator-related infections.


Subject(s)
Home Care Services , Respiration, Artificial , Tracheostomy , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Saudi Arabia/epidemiology , Adult , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/prevention & control , Intensive Care Units , Cohort Studies
11.
BMC Infect Dis ; 24(1): 674, 2024 Jul 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38969966

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Device-associated infections (DAIs) are a significant cause of morbidity following living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). We aimed to assess the impact of bundled care on reducing rates of device-associated infections. METHODS: We performed a before-and-after comparative study at a liver transplantation facility over a three-year period, spanning from January 2016 to December 2018. The study included a total of 57 patients who underwent LDLT. We investigated the implementation of a care bundle, which consists of multiple evidence-based procedures that are consistently performed as a unified unit. We divided our study into three phases and implemented a bundled care approach in the second phase. Rates of pneumonia related to ventilators [VAP], bloodstream infections associated with central line [CLABSI], and urinary tract infections associated with catheters [CAUTI] were assessed throughout the study period. Bacterial identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing were performed using the automated Vitek-2 system. The comparison between different phases was assessed using the chi-square test or the Fisher exact test for qualitative values and the Kruskal-Wallis H test for quantitative values with non-normal distribution. RESULTS: In the baseline phase, the VAP rates were 73.5, the CAUTI rates were 47.2, and the CLABSI rates were 7.4 per one thousand device days (PDD). During the bundle care phase, the rates decreased to 33.3, 18.18, and 4.78. In the follow-up phase, the rates further decreased to 35.7%, 16.8%, and 2.7% PDD. The prevalence of Klebsiella pneumonia (37.5%) and Methicillin resistance Staph aureus (37.5%) in VAP were noted. The primary causative agent of CAUTI was Candida albicans, accounting for 33.3% of cases, whereas Coagulase-negative Staph was the predominant organism responsible for CLABSI, with a prevalence of 40%. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the effectiveness of utilizing the care bundle approach to reduce DAI in LDLT, especially in low socioeconomic countries with limited resources. By implementing a comprehensive set of evidence-based interventions, healthcare systems can effectively reduce the burden of DAI, enhance infection prevention strategies and improve patient outcomes in resource-constrained settings.


Subject(s)
Catheter-Related Infections , Liver Transplantation , Living Donors , Patient Care Bundles , Tertiary Care Centers , Humans , Liver Transplantation/adverse effects , Tertiary Care Centers/statistics & numerical data , Female , Male , Egypt/epidemiology , Catheter-Related Infections/epidemiology , Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Catheter-Related Infections/microbiology , Adult , Middle Aged , Patient Care Bundles/methods , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/microbiology , Urinary Tract Infections/epidemiology , Urinary Tract Infections/prevention & control , Urinary Tract Infections/microbiology
12.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 103(27): e38783, 2024 Jul 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38968477

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study is to assess the impact of an early-graded pulmonary rehabilitation training program on patients undergoing mechanical ventilation due to brainstem hemorrhage. METHODS: Eighty patients receiving mechanical ventilation due to brainstem hemorrhage at our hospital's neurosurgery department between August 2022 and October 2023 were enrolled as participants. A sampling table was generated based on the order of admission, and 80 random sequences were generated using SPSS software. These sequences were then sorted in ascending order, with the first half designated as the control group and the second half as the intervention group, each comprising 40 cases. The control group received standard nursing care for mechanical ventilation in brainstem hemorrhage cases, while the intervention group underwent early-graded pulmonary rehabilitation training in addition to standard care. This intervention was conducted in collaboration with a multidisciplinary respiratory critical care rehabilitation team. The study compared respiratory function indices, ventilator weaning success rates, ventilator-associated pneumonia incidence, mechanical ventilation duration, and patient discharge duration between the 2 groups. RESULTS: The comparison between patients in the observation group and the control group regarding peak expiratory flow and maximum inspiratory pressure on days 1, 3, 5, and 7 revealed statistically significant differences (P < .05). Additionally, there was a statistically significant interaction between the main effect of intervention and the main effect of time (P < .05). The success rate of ventilator withdrawal was notably higher in the observation group (62.5%) compared to the control group (32.5%), with a statistically significant difference (P < .05). Moreover, the incidence rate of ventilator-associated pneumonia was significantly lower in the observation group (2.5%) compared to the control group (17.5%) (P < .05). Furthermore, both the duration of mechanical ventilation and hospitalization were significantly shorter in the observation group compared to the control group (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Early-graded pulmonary rehabilitation training demonstrates effectiveness in enhancing respiratory function, augmenting the ventilator withdrawal success rate, and reducing both the duration of mechanical ventilation and hospitalization in mechanically ventilated patients with brainstem hemorrhage. These findings suggest the potential value of promoting the application of this intervention in clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Respiration, Artificial , Humans , Respiration, Artificial/methods , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Brain Stem , Intracranial Hemorrhages/rehabilitation , Aged , Adult , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/prevention & control , Ventilator Weaning/methods , Treatment Outcome
13.
PLoS One ; 19(6): e0304583, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38848351

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The recommendation for Chlorhexidine (CHX) as a traditional oral care solution is decreasing, and herbal oral care products are being considered as a potential alternative. This network meta-analysis aims to determine if herbal oral care products for oral care in mechanically ventilated patients are superior to CHX and provide direction for future research by comparing the effectiveness of herbal oral care products currently available. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched for English-language published and grey literature sources of randomized clinical trials involving herbal oral care solutions in intensive care unit (ICU) oral care (until September 2023). The primary outcome was the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP); the secondary outcome was the oral microbiota quantity. Data were pooled by pairwise meta-analysis and Bayesian network meta-analysis. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE framework. RESULTS: Our network meta-analysis included 29 studies, and the results showed that Chinese herb (OR: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.2-0.75) and Miswak (OR: 0.27, 95% CI: 0.07-0.91) were more effective in reducing VAP incidence than CHX. In terms of reducing bacterial counts, Chinese herb (OR: 0.3, 95% CI: 0.19-0.48) was superior to CHX, and all herbal oral care products, including Persica® (alcoholic extract of S. persica, Achillea millefolium, and Mentha spicata), Matrica® (Chamomile extract), and Listerine® (main components include Menthol, Thymol, and Eucalyptol), were better than saline in all aspects but without significant differences. CONCLUSION: Based on our network meta-analysis, we have observed that Chinese herbal medicine and Miswak are superior to CHX in reducing the incidence of VAP. However, the safety and feasibility of traditional Chinese herbal medicine require further high-quality research for validation. Simultaneously, Matrica® demonstrates a significant reduction in microbial counts but does not exhibit a significant advantage in lowering the incidence of VAP. This observation aligns with the results of clinical double-blind trials. Therefore, we identify Miswak and Matrica® as promising herbal oral care products with the potential to replace CHX. It is essential to emphasize that our study provides guidance for future research rather than conclusive determinations. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO no. CRD42023398022.


Subject(s)
Network Meta-Analysis , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/prevention & control , Humans , Chlorhexidine/therapeutic use , Chlorhexidine/administration & dosage , Mouthwashes , Bayes Theorem , Intensive Care Units
14.
J Surg Res ; 300: 448-457, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38870652

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is associated with increased mortality, prolonged mechanical ventilation, and longer intensive care unit stays. The rate of VAP (VAPs per 1000 ventilator days) within a hospital is an important quality metric. Despite adoption of preventative strategies, rates of VAP in injured patients remain high in trauma centers. Here, we report variation in risk-adjusted VAP rates within a statewide quality collaborative. METHODS: Using Michigan Trauma Quality Improvement Program data from 35 American College of Surgeons-verified Level I and Level II trauma centers between November 1, 2020 and January 31, 2023, a patient-level Poisson model was created to evaluate the risk-adjusted rate of VAP across institutions given the number of ventilator days, adjusting for injury severity, physiologic parameters, and comorbid conditions. Patient-level model results were summed to create center-level estimates. We performed observed-to-expected adjustments to calculate each center's risk-adjusted VAP days and flagged outliers as hospitals whose confidence intervals lay above or below the overall mean. RESULTS: We identified 538 VAP occurrences among a total of 33,038 ventilator days within the collaborative, with an overall mean of 16.3 VAPs per 1000 ventilator days. We found wide variation in risk-adjusted rates of VAP, ranging from 0 (0-8.9) to 33.0 (14.4-65.1) VAPs per 1000 d. Several hospitals were identified as high or low outliers. CONCLUSIONS: There exists significant variation in the rate of VAP among trauma centers. Investigation of practices and factors influencing the differences between low and high outlier institutions may yield information to reduce variation and improve outcomes.


Subject(s)
Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated , Quality Improvement , Trauma Centers , Humans , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/etiology , Michigan/epidemiology , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Trauma Centers/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Risk Adjustment/methods , Aged , Respiration, Artificial/statistics & numerical data , Respiration, Artificial/adverse effects
15.
J Perinatol ; 44(9): 1235-1243, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38698211

ABSTRACT

We review the pathophysiology, epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in neonates. VAP has been studied primarily in adult ICU patients, although there has been more focus on pediatric and neonatal VAP (neo-VAP) in the last decade. The definition as well as diagnosis of VAP in neonates remains a challenge to date. The neonatal intensivist needs to be familiar with the current diagnostic tools and prevention strategies available to treat and reduce VAP to reduce neonatal morbidity and the emergence of antibiotic resistance. This review also highlights preventive strategies and old and emerging treatments available.


Subject(s)
Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Intubation, Intratracheal , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/epidemiology , Intubation, Intratracheal/adverse effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Risk Factors
16.
Crit Care Med ; 52(10): 1612-1623, 2024 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38722206

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of antibiotics delivered via the respiratory tract in preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). DATA SOURCES: We searched PubMed, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov for studies published in English up to October 25, 2023. STUDY SELECTION: Adult patients with mechanical ventilation of over 48 h and receiving inhaled or instilled antibiotics (with control group) to prevent VAP were included. DATA EXTRACTION: Two independent groups screened studies, extracted the data, and assessed the risk of bias. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach was used to assess the certainty/quality of the evidence. Results of a random-effects model were reported for overall and predefined subgroup meta-analyses. The analysis was primarily conducted on randomized controlled trials, and observational studies were used for sensitivity analyses. DATA SYNTHESIS: Seven RCTs with 1445 patients were included, of which six involving 1283 patients used nebulizers to deliver antibiotics. No obvious risk of bias was found among the included RCTs for the primary outcome. Compared with control group, prophylactic antibiotics delivery via the respiratory tract significantly reduced the risk of VAP (risk ratio [RR], 0.69 [95% CI, 0.53-0.89]), particularly in subgroups where aminoglycosides (RR, 0.67 [0.47-0.97]) or nebulization (RR, 0.64 [0.49-0.83]) were used as opposed to other antibiotics (ceftazidime and colistin) or intratracheal instillation. No significant differences were observed in mortality, mechanical ventilation duration, ICU and hospital length of stay, duration of systemic antibiotics, need for tracheostomy, and adverse events between the two groups. Results were confirmed in sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: In adult patients with mechanical ventilation for over 48 h, prophylactic antibiotics delivered via the respiratory tract reduced the risk of VAP, particularly for those treated with nebulized aminoglycosides.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated , Humans , Administration, Inhalation , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/methods , Network Meta-Analysis , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/prevention & control , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Respiration, Artificial/adverse effects
17.
Respir Care ; 69(7): 854-868, 2024 06 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38806219

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has had an unprecedented impact on population health and hospital operations. Over 7 million patients have been hospitalized for COVID-19 thus far in the United States alone. Mortality rates for hospitalized patients during the first wave of the pandemic were > 30%, but as we enter the fifth year of the pandemic hospitalizations have fallen and mortality rates for hospitalized patients with COVID-19 have plummeted to 5% or less. These gains reflect lessons learned about how to optimize respiratory support for different kinds of patients, targeted use of therapeutics for patients with different manifestations of COVID-19 including immunosuppressants and antivirals as appropriate, and high levels of population immunity acquired through vaccines and natural infections. At the same time, the pandemic has helped highlight some longstanding sources of harm for hospitalized patients including hospital-acquired pneumonia, ventilator-associated events (VAEs), and hospital-acquired respiratory viral infections. We are, thankfully, on the leeside of the pandemic at present; but the large increases in ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), VAEs, bacterial superinfections, and nosocomial respiratory viral infections associated with the pandemic beg the question of how best to prevent these complications moving forward. This paper reviews the burden of hospitalization for COVID-19, the intersection between COVID-19 and both VAP and VAEs, the frequency and impact of hospital-acquired respiratory viral infections, new recommendations on how best to prevent VAP and VAEs, and current insights into effective strategies to prevent nosocomial spread of respiratory viruses.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cross Infection , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated , Humans , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/prevention & control , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia/epidemiology
18.
BMC Oral Health ; 24(1): 636, 2024 May 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38811949

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) increases the length of hospitalization and mortality rate. This study aimed to determine the effect of propolis mouthwash on the incidence of VAP in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Triple-blind, comparative randomized, controlled clinical trial was conducted over one year, with 110 ICU patients at Imam-Hossein and Bahar hospitals (Shahroud) and Kowsar Hospital (Semnan) in Iran. The intervention group used 15 cc of 0.06% propolis mouthwash solution twice daily at 8 AM and 4 PM for seven days. The control group used 15 cc of 0.2% chlorhexidine mouthwash at the same times and duration. Data were collected using a demographic questionnaire, APACHE II, Beck Oral Assessment Scale, and Modified Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (MCPIS). RESULTS: There was no significant difference in demographic information, disease severity, and oral health between the two groups before and after intervention (P > 0.05). The incidence of VAP in the intervention group compared to the control group was 10.9% vs. 30.9% on the third day (P = 0.0166, 95% CI: 0.53-0.83 and RR = 0.35), 23.6% vs. 43.6% on the fifth day (P = 0.0325 and 95% CI: 0.31-0.95 and RR = 0.54), and 25.5% vs. 47.3% on the seventh day (P = 0.0224, 95% CI: 0.32-0.92, and RR = 0.54). The Mann-Whitney indicated the incidence of VAP was significantly lower in the intervention group on the third, fifth, and seventh days. CONCLUSION: Propolis mouthwash can be considered as an alternative to chlorhexidine mouthwash for ICU patients. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Propolis mouthwash serves as a simple, economical intervention to potentially reduce incidence of VAP. TRIAL REGISTRATION: (IRCT20110427006318N12, date 02.04.2019).


Subject(s)
Intensive Care Units , Mouthwashes , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated , Propolis , Humans , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/epidemiology , Mouthwashes/therapeutic use , Male , Female , Propolis/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Incidence , Iran/epidemiology , Adult , Chlorhexidine/therapeutic use , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/therapeutic use , Aged , APACHE
19.
Food Funct ; 15(11): 5737-5751, 2024 Jun 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38771159

ABSTRACT

The literature regarding the role of probiotics in critically ill patients who have undergone mechanical ventilation (MV) is unclear; therefore, this umbrella systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out to clarify the effects of probiotics on the clinical outcomes of mechanically ventilated patients. The Scopus, PubMed/Medline, ISI Web of Science, and Google Scholar online databases were searched up to February 2023. All meta-analyses evaluating the impact of probiotics in patients under MV were considered eligible. The assessment of multiple systematic reviews (AMSTAR) questionnaire was used to evaluate the quality of the studies. Data were pooled using the random-effects approach. Thirty meta-analyses and nine clinical outcomes were re-analyzed. Probiotics significantly decreased ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) incidence, nosocomial infections, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, hospital length of stay, ICU mortality, hospital mortality, MV duration, duration of antibiotic use, and diarrhea. The obtained results of the current umbrella meta-analysis indicate that probiotic administration could be considered an adjunct therapy for critically ill patients; however, no specific probiotic treatment regimen can be recommended due to the diverse probiotics used in the included meta-analyses. The following microorganisms were used at various doses and combinations throughout the studies: Lacticaseibacillus casei, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, L. acidophilus, L. delbrueckii, L. bulgaricus, Bifidobacterium longum, B. breve, B. salivarius, Pediococcus pentosaceus, Lactococcus raffinolactis, B. infantis, B. bifidum, Streptococcus thermophilus, Ligilactobacillus salivarius, L. lactis, B. lactis, Saccharomyces boulardii, L. rhamnosus GG, L. johnsonii, L. casei, S. faecalis, Clostridium butyricum, Bacillus mesentericus, L. sporogenes, S. boulardii, L. paracasei, B. subtilis, and Enterococcus faecium.


Subject(s)
Critical Illness , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated , Probiotics , Respiration, Artificial , Probiotics/therapeutic use , Humans , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/prevention & control , Intensive Care Units , Length of Stay
20.
BMC Med Res Methodol ; 24(1): 116, 2024 May 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38762731

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Extended illness-death models (a specific class of multistate models) are a useful tool to analyse situations like hospital-acquired infections, ventilation-associated pneumonia, and transfers between hospitals. The main components of these models are hazard rates and transition probabilities. Calculation of different measures and their interpretation can be challenging due to their complexity. METHODS: By assuming time-constant hazards, the complexity of these models becomes manageable and closed mathematical forms for transition probabilities can be derived. Using these forms, we created a tool in R to visualize transition probabilities via stacked probability plots. RESULTS: In this article, we present this tool and give some insights into its theoretical background. Using published examples, we give guidelines on how this tool can be used. Our goal is to provide an instrument that helps obtain a deeper understanding of a complex multistate setting. CONCLUSION: While multistate models (in particular extended illness-death models), can be highly complex, this tool can be used in studies to both understand assumptions, which have been made during planning and as a first step in analysing complex data structures. An online version of this tool can be found at https://eidm.imbi.uni-freiburg.de/ .


Subject(s)
Probability , Humans , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Models, Statistical , Proportional Hazards Models , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/mortality , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/prevention & control , Mobile Applications/statistics & numerical data , Algorithms
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL