Phase 1 Study of CK0801 in Treatment of Bone Marrow Failure Syndromes.

BACKGROUND: An inflammatory bone marrow microenvironment contributes to acquired bone marrow failure syndromes. CK0801, an allogeneic T regulatory (Treg) cell therapy product, can potentially interrupt this continuous loop of inflammation and restore hematopoiesis. METHODS: In this phase 1 dose-escalation study of CK0801 Treg cells, we enrolled patients with bone marrow failure syndromes with suboptimal response to their prior therapy to determine the safety and efficacy of this treatment for bone marrow failure syndromes. RESULTS: We enrolled nine patients with a median age of 57 years (range, 19 to 74) with an underlying diagnosis of aplastic anemia (n=4), myelofibrosis (n=4), or hypoplastic myelodysplasia (n=1). Patients had a median of three prior therapies for a bone marrow failure syndrome. Starting dose levels of CK0801 were 1 × 106 (n=3), 3 × 106 (n=3), and 10 × 106 (n=3) cells per kg of ideal body weight. No lymphodepletion was administered. CK0801 was administered in the outpatient setting with no infusion reactions, no grade 3 or 4 severe adverse reactions, and no dose-limiting toxicity. At 12 months, CK0801 induced objective responses in three of four patients with myelofibrosis (two had symptom response, one had anemia response, and one had stable disease) and three of four patients with aplastic anemia (three had partial response). Three of four transfusion-dependent patients at baseline achieved transfusion independence. Although the duration of observation was limited at 0.9 to 12 months, there were no observed increases in infections, no transformations to leukemia, and no deaths. CONCLUSIONS: In previously treated patients, CK0801 demonstrated no dose-limiting toxicity and showed evidence of efficacy, providing proof of concept for targeting inflammation as a therapy for bone marrow failure. (Funded by Cellenkos Inc.; Clinicaltrials.gov number, NCT03773393.).

Treosulfan compared to busulfan in allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for myelofibrosis: a registry-based study from the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the EBMT.

We aimed to compare outcomes following treosulfan (TREO) or busulfan (BU) conditioning in a large cohort of myelofibrosis (MF) patients from the EBMT registry. A total of 530 patients were included; 73 received TREO and 457 BU (BU ≤ 6.4 mg/kg in 134, considered RIC, BU > 6.4 mg/kg in 323 considered higher dose (HD)). Groups were compared using adjusted Cox models. Cumulative incidences of engraftment and acute GVHD were similar across the 3 groups. The TREO group had significantly better OS than BU-HD (HR:0.61, 95% CI: 0.39-0.93) and a trend towards better OS over BU-RIC (HR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.41-1.05). Moreover, the TREO cohort had a significantly better Progression-Free-Survival (PFS) than both the BU-HD (HR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.38-0.84) and BU-RIC (HR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.39-0.91) cohorts, which had similar PFS estimates. Non-relapse mortality (NRM) was reduced in the TREO and BU-RIC cohorts (HR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.24-0.80 TREO vs BU-HD; HR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.28-1.04 TREO vs BU-RIC). Of note, relapse risk did not significantly differ across the three groups. In summary, within the limits of a registry-based study, TREO conditioning may improve PFS in MF HSCT and have lower NRM than BU-HD with a similar relapse risk to BU-RIC. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Transplantation for myelofibrosis patients in the ruxolitinib era: a registry study from the Société Francophone de Greffe de Moelle et de Thérapie Cellulaire.

In this SFGM-TC registry study, we report the results after stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in 305 myelofibrosis patients, in order to determine potential risk factors associated with outcomes, especially regarding previous treatment with ruxolitinib. A total of 102 patients were transplanted from an HLA-matched-sibling donor (MSD), and 143 patients received ruxolitinib. In contrast with previous studies, our results showed significantly worse outcomes for ruxolitinib patients regarding overall survival (OS) and non-relapse mortality (NRM), especially in the context of unrelated donors (URD). When exploring reasons for potential confounders regarding the ruxolitinib effect, an interaction between the type of donor and the use of ATG was found, therefore subsequent analyses were performed separately for each type of donor. Multivariable analyses did not confirm a significant negative impact of ruxolitinib in transplantation outcomes. In the setting of URD, only age and Fludarabine-Melphalan (FM) conditioning were associated with increased NRM. For MSD, only Karnoksfy <70% was associated with reduced OS. However, a propensity score analysis showed that ruxolitinib had a negative impact on OS but only in non-responding patients, consistent with previous data. To conclude, with all the precautions due to confounders and bias, ruxolitinib itself does not appear to increase mortality after HSCT.

Impact of myelofibrosis on patients with myelodysplastic syndromes following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The prognostic significance of myelofibrosis (MF) grade in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) following an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remains elusive. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from 153 patients with MDS who underwent allo-HSCT and divided the patients into the MF-0/1 (N = 119) and MF-2/3 (N = 34) cohorts to explore the impact of MF on outcomes of allo-HSCT. RESULTS: The 2-year rates of relapse, non-relapse mortality (NRM), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were 10.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.9%-17.7%), 16.3% (95% CI 10.2%-23.6%), 76.6% (95% CI 69.0%-85.1%), and 72.8% (95% CI 65.0%-81.5%) in the MF-0/1 cohort, and 16.9% (95% CI 5.8%-32.9%), 14.7% (95% CI 5.3%-28.7%), 71.8% (95% CI 57.6%-89.6%), and 68.4% (95% CI 53.6%-87.2%) in the MF-2/3 cohort, respectively. No significant difference in the outcomes of allo-HSCT was observed between the two cohorts. Both univariate and multivariate analyses confirmed that MF-2/3 in patients with MDS had no effect on the prognosis of transplantation. In addition, major/bidirectional ABO blood type between donors and recipients was an independent risk factor for OS (hazard ratio [HR], 2.55; 95% CI 1.25-5.21; P = 0.010) and PFS (HR, 2.21; 95% CI 1.10-4.42; P = 0.025) in the multivariate analysis. In the subgroup of patients diagnosed with MDS with increased blasts (MDS-IB), it was consistently demonstrated that the clinical outcomes of the MF-2/3 cohort were comparable with those of the MF-0/1 cohort. The risk factors for OS and PFS in patients with MDS-IB were non-complete remission at transplantation and major/bidirectional ABO blood type. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, MF grade had no significant effect on prognosis of allo-HSCT in patients diagnosed with MDS. Major/bidirectional ABO blood type should be carefully considered in the context of more than one available donor.

Management of Patients with Early Myelofibrosis: A Discussion of Best Practices.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Summarize best practices for management of patients with early myelofibrosis (MF). RECENT FINDINGS: Myelofibrosis is a progressive myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) that generally produces burdensome symptoms and ultimately leads to worse overall survival than that observed in healthy controls or patients with other MPNs. Several Janus kinase inhibitors and various interferon formulations are now available for treatment of MF, with ruxolitinib notable for extending overall survival in addition to improving MF signs and symptoms. The chronic nature of the disease can lead some patients to avoid immediate treatment in favor of a watch-and-wait approach. This review summarizes the patient management approach taken in my practice, providing guidance and a discussion of best practices with an emphasis on the importance and clinical benefits of active treatment in early MF. In particular, a case is made to consider treatment with ruxolitinib for patients with intermediate-1 risk disease and to minimize delay between diagnosis and treatment initiation for patients with intermediate or high-risk disease.

[Pathogenesis and Targeted Treatment Progress of Splenomegaly in Primary Myelofibrosis--Review].

Primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm with splenomegaly as the major clinical manifestation, which is commonly considered to be linked to splenic extramedullary hematopoiesis. Alteration of CXCL12/CXCR4 pathway can lead to the migration of hematopoietic stem cells and hematopoietic progenitor cells from bone marrow to spleen which results in splenic extramedullary hematopoiesis. In addition, low GATA1 expression and the abnormal secretion of cytokines were found to be significantly associated with splenomegaly. With the application of JAK1/2 inhibitors in clinical, the symptoms of splenomegaly have been significantly improved in PMF patients. This article will review the pathogenesis and targeted treatment progress of splenomegaly in PMF.

Impact of comorbidities and body mass index on the outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in myelofibrosis: A study on behalf of the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of EBMT.

Investigating the evaluation of eligibility for transplant in myelofibrosis (MF): The role of HCT-CI and BMI. HCT-CI emerges as a key prognostic factor, while BMI shows limited impact. This study expands insights for better clinical decision-making in MF allo-HCT.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions | Diagnosis, Outcomes, and Management of Prefibrotic Myelofibrosis.

Prefibrotic primary myelofibrosis (prefibrotic PMF) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm with distinct characteristics comprising histopathological and clinico-biological parameters. It is classified as a subtype of primary myelofibrosis. In clinical practice, it is essential to correctly distinguish prefibrotic PMF from essential thrombocythemia especially but also overt PMF besides other myeloid neoplasms. Risk stratification and survival outcomes for prefibrotic PMF are worse than that of ET but better than that of overt PMF. Rates of progression to overt PMF and blast phase disease are also higher for prefibrotic PMF than ET. In this review we first discuss the historical context to the evolution of prefibrotic PMF as an entity, its presenting features and diagnostic criteria. We emphasize the differences between prefibrotic PMF, ET, and overt PMF with regards to presenting features and disease outcomes including thrombohemorrhagic events and progression to fibrotic and blast phase disease. Next, we discuss the risk stratification models and contextualize these in the setting of clinical management. We share our view of personalizing treatment to address unique patient needs in the context of currently available management options. Lastly, we discuss areas of critical need in clinical research and speculate on the possibility of future disease course modifying therapies in prefibrotic PMF.

Myelofibrosis: Current unmet needs, emerging treatments, and future perspectives.

The current standard-of-care for treatment of myelofibrosis (MF) comprises inhibitors of the Janus kinase (JAK)/signal transducers and activators (STAT) pathway; however, despite their ability to alleviate symptoms, they do not appear to modify underlying disease and have not demonstrated substantial survival benefit. Allogeneic-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation remains the only curative option for patients with MF but is limited to a subset of high-risk and fit patients. Early disease modification could positively affect disease trajectory for lower risk patients with MF as well as those with conditions that can precede MF, such as polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia. Here, the authors discuss critical unmet needs in the MF treatment paradigm, including: the need for safe, impactful therapies for lower risk patients, thus allowing intervention when success is most likely; better development of first-line therapies (likely highly novel or combination strategies) for intermediate-risk/higher risk patients; and approved drugs to manage cytopenia. Finally, a consensus definition of disease modification is needed that informs trial design, allowing the development of clinical end points that enable understanding of therapies and responses and that facilitate the development of therapies that work according to this definition. Through close collaboration between clinicians, patients, and the pharmaceutical industry, better efforts to define benefit and identify patients most likely to benefit from a particular combination or treatment strategy should enable the development of more effective and safe treatments to extend and improve quality of life for patients with MF.

Clinical Features and Long-Term Outcomes of a Pan-Canadian Cohort of Adolescents and Young Adults with Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: A Canadian MPN Group Study.

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are a group of chronic hematologic malignancies that lead to morbidity and early mortality due to thrombotic complications and progression to acute leukemia. Clinical and mutational risk factors have been demonstrated to predict outcomes in patients with MPNs and are used commonly to guide therapeutic decisions, including allogenic stem cell transplant, in myelofibrosis. Adolescents and young adults (AYA, age ≤45 years) comprise less than 10% of all MPN patients and have unique clinical and therapeutic considerations. The prevalence and clinical impact of somatic mutations implicated in myeloid disease has not been extensively examined in this population. We conducted a retrospective review of patients evaluated at eight Canadian centers for MPN patients diagnosed at ≤45 years of age. In total, 609 patients were included in the study, with median overall survival of 36.8 years. Diagnosis of prefibrotic or overt PMF is associated with the lowest OS and highest risk of AP/BP transformation. Thrombotic complications (24%), including splanchnic circulation thrombosis (9%), were frequent in the cohort. Mutations in addition to those in JAK2/MPL/CALR are uncommon in the initial disease phase in our AYA population (12%); but our data indicate they may be predictive of transformation to post-ET/PV myelofibrosis.

[Primary myelofibrosis with double mutation in U2AF1].

A 47-year-old woman presented with subcutaneous hemorrhage. Blood tests revealed leukoerythroblastosis, anemia, and thrombocytopenia. Bone marrow biopsy led to a diagnosis of primary myelofibrosis (aaDIPSS, DIPSS-plus: intermediate-II risk). JAK2, CALR, and MPL mutations were not detected in peripheral blood, but targeted sequencing of bone marrow specimens revealed a double mutation (Q157R, S34F) in U2AF1. Allo-PBSCT was performed using an HLA-matched related donor, and post-transplantation bone marrow examination showed complete donor chimerism on day 55. Two years after allogeneic transplantation, the patient remains relapse-free. Although U2AF1 gene abnormality is known as a poor prognostic factor in primary myelofibrosis, this patient had a favorable long-term prognosis due to prompt transplantation therapy. This case highlights the importance of detailed gene mutation analysis in patients with triple-negative MF.

[Multiple myeloma with myelofibrosis at diagnosis and aggressive extramedullary relapse after autologous stem cell transplantation].

A 66-year-old man was diagnosed with symptomatic IgG-λ multiple myeloma based on the presence of anemia, thrombocytopenia, renal dysfunction, and a tumor on the right sixth rib. Bone marrow aspiration yielded a dry tap and biopsy revealed myelofibrosis grade 2. Partial response was achieved with Bd (bortezomib and dexamethasone) and VRd (bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone). The patient received autologous stem cell transplantation, but the myeloma relapsed 3 months later, and liver tumors developed as well. DKd (daratumumab, carfilzomib, and dexamethasone) was administered, but the patient died due to disease progression. Autopsy revealed multiple extramedullary lesions in the liver, spleen, gallbladder, adrenal glands, kidneys, and multiple lymph nodes, as well as ascites.

The management of myelofibrosis: a British Society for Haematology guideline

This document represents an update of the British Society for Haematology guideline on Myelofibrosis first published in 2012 and updated in 2015 These guidelines aim to pro-vide healthcare professionals with clear guidance on stratified management for primary myelofibrosis (PMF), as well as post-polycythaemia myelofibrosis (post-PV MF) and postessential thrombocythaemia myelofibrosis (post-ET MF). A separate BSH guideline covers the diagnosis and prognostic evaluation of myelofibrosis and is published alongside this guideline

Indication and management of allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in myelofibrosis: updated recommendations by the EBMT/ELN International Working Group.

New options for medical therapy and risk scoring systems containing molecular data are leading to increased complexity in the management of patients with myelofibrosis. To inform patients' optimal care, we updated the 2015 guidelines on indications for and management of allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) with the support of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) and European LeukemiaNet (ELN). New recommendations were produced using a consensus-building methodology after a comprehensive review of articles released from January, 2015 to December, 2022. Seven domains and 18 key questions were selected through a series of questionnaires using a Delphi process. Key recommendations in this update include: patients with primary myelofibrosis and an intermediate-2 or high-risk Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System score, or a high-risk Mutation-Enhanced International Prognostic Score Systems (MIPSS70 or MIPSS70-plus) score, or a low-risk or intermediate-risk Myelofibrosis Transplant Scoring System score should be considered candidates for allogeneic HSCT. All patients who are candidates for allogeneic HSCT with splenomegaly greater than 5 cm below the left costal margin or splenomegaly-related symptoms should receive a spleen-directed treatment, ideally with a JAK-inhibitor; HLA-matched sibling donors remain the preferred donor source to date. Reduced intensity conditioning and myeloablative conditioning are both valid options for patients with myelofibrosis. Regular post-transplantation driver mutation monitoring is recommended to detect and treat early relapse with donor lymphocyte infusion. In a disease where evidence-based guidance is scarce, these recommendations might help clinicians and patients in shared decision making.

Laboratory methods of monitoring disease response after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for myelofibrosis.

The era of molecular prognostication in myelofibrosis has allowed comprehensive assessment of disease risk and informed decisions regarding allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). However, monitoring disease response after transplantation is difficult, and limited by disease and sample-related factors. The emergence of laboratory techniques sensitive enough to monitor measurable residual disease is promising in predicting molecular and haematological relapse and guiding management. This paper summarises the existing literature regarding methods for detecting and monitoring disease response after HSCT in myelofibrosis and explores the therapeutic use of measurable residual disease (MRD) assays in transplant recipients. Laboratory assessment of disease response in myelofibrosis post-allogeneic transplant is limited by disease and treatment characteristics and by the sensitivity of available conventional molecular assays. The identification of MRD has prognostic implications and may allow early intervention to prevent relapse. Further applicability is limited by mutation-specific assay variability, a lack of standardisation and sample considerations.

Evidence creation for myelofibrosis: Challenges and opportunities.

Evidence-based guidelines for rare diseases, such as myelofibrosis (MF), continue to prove challenging to develop, and decision-making for MF is complex. The British Society for Haematology (BSH) has created a pragmatic symptom-guided risk-adapted framework on all aspects of management of MF and shared best practices on the use of JAK inhibitors, transplantation and other conventional therapies in the management of myelofibrosis. Commentary on: McLornan et al. The management of myelofibrosis: A British Society for Haematology Guideline. Br J Haematol 2024;204:136-150.