Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 1.114
Filter
1.
Prog Cardiovasc Dis ; 84: 2-6, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38754533

ABSTRACT

Personalizing risk assessment and treatment decisions for the primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) rely on pooled cohort equations and increasingly coronary artery calcium (CAC) score. A growing body of evidence supports that elevated CAC scores correspond to progressively elevated ASCVD risk, and that scores of ≥100, ≥300, and ≥1000 denote risk that is equivalent to certain secondary prevention populations. This has led consensus guidelines to incorporate CAC score thresholds for guiding escalation of preventive therapy for lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals, initiation of non-statin lipid lowering medications, and use of low-dose daily aspirin. As data on CAC continues to grow, more decision pathways will incorporate CAC score cutoffs to guide management of blood pressure and cardiometabolic medications. CAC score is also being used to enrich clinical trial study populations for elevated ASCVD risk, and to screen for subclinical coronary atherosclerosis in patients who received chest imaging for other diagnostic purposes.


Subject(s)
Aspirin , Biomarkers , Cholesterol, LDL , Coronary Artery Disease , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Vascular Calcification , Humans , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnosis , Vascular Calcification/diagnostic imaging , Vascular Calcification/diagnosis , Aspirin/therapeutic use , Aspirin/adverse effects , Aspirin/administration & dosage , Cholesterol, LDL/blood , Biomarkers/blood , Risk Assessment , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Primary Prevention/standards , Dyslipidemias/drug therapy , Dyslipidemias/blood , Dyslipidemias/diagnosis , Risk Factors , Predictive Value of Tests , Coronary Vessels/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Vessels/drug effects
2.
BMC Prim Care ; 25(1): 153, 2024 May 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38711031

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) synthesize high-quality information to support evidence-based clinical practice. In primary care, numerous CPGs must be integrated to address the needs of patients with multiple risks and conditions. The BETTER program aims to improve prevention and screening for cancer and chronic disease in primary care by synthesizing CPGs into integrated, actionable recommendations. We describe the process used to harmonize high-quality cancer and chronic disease prevention and screening (CCDPS) CPGs to update the BETTER program. METHODS: A review of CPG databases, repositories, and grey literature was conducted to identify international and Canadian (national and provincial) CPGs for CCDPS in adults 40-69 years of age across 19 topic areas: cancers, cardiovascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, hepatitis C, obesity, osteoporosis, depression, and associated risk factors (i.e., diet, physical activity, alcohol, cannabis, drug, tobacco, and vaping/e-cigarette use). CPGs published in English between 2016 and 2021, applicable to adults, and containing CCDPS recommendations were included. Guideline quality was assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II tool and a three-step process involving patients, health policy, content experts, primary care providers, and researchers was used to identify and synthesize recommendations. RESULTS: We identified 51 international and Canadian CPGs and 22 guidelines developed by provincial organizations that provided relevant CCDPS recommendations. Clinical recommendations were extracted and reviewed for inclusion using the following criteria: 1) pertinence to primary prevention and screening, 2) relevance to adults ages 40-69, and 3) applicability to diverse primary care settings. Recommendations were synthesized and integrated into the BETTER toolkit alongside resources to support shared decision-making and care paths for the BETTER program. CONCLUSIONS: Comprehensive care requires the ability to address a person's overall health. An approach to identify high-quality clinical guidance to comprehensively address CCDPS is described. The process used to synthesize and harmonize implementable clinical recommendations may be useful to others wanting to integrate evidence across broad content areas to provide comprehensive care. The BETTER toolkit provides resources that clearly and succinctly present a breadth of clinical evidence that providers can use to assist with implementing CCDPS guidance in primary care.


Subject(s)
Practice Guidelines as Topic , Primary Health Care , Primary Prevention , Humans , Primary Health Care/standards , Primary Prevention/standards , Canada , Mass Screening/standards , Chronic Disease/prevention & control , Middle Aged , Adult , Aged , Neoplasms/prevention & control , Neoplasms/diagnosis
4.
JAMA Cardiol ; 7(10): 997-999, 2022 10 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35998005

ABSTRACT

This Editorial compares the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendations with the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology (AHA/ACC)/multisociety guidelines on statin usage in primary prevention.


Subject(s)
Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors , American Heart Association , Humans , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Primary Prevention/standards
5.
J Acad Nutr Diet ; 122(2): 410-423.e6, 2022 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35065817

ABSTRACT

This Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Position Paper reports current evidence on pediatric overweight and obesity prevention interventions and discusses implications for registered dietitian nutritionists (RDNs). An overview of current systematic reviews provided evidence-based results from a range of nutrition interventions according to developmental age group (ages 2 to 5, 6 to 12, and 13 to 17 years). Twenty-one current systematic reviews of nutrition interventions demonstrated a beneficial effect of nutrition and physical activity interventions on body mass index measures and no adverse events were identified. RDNs impart nutrition expertise in a wide range of settings to provide comprehensive care for children and adolescents as their nutrition and developmental needs change over time. This Position Paper outlines the current roles of, and proposed directions for, RDNs engaged in pediatric overweight and obesity prevention. Prevention of pediatric overweight and obesity requires comprehensive strategies ranging from policy-level to individual-level interventions in settings that will have the most beneficial impact for children according to their developmental stage. This Position Paper advocates for increased availability of nutrition and food access programs and interventions to reduce risk of pediatric obesity and associated adverse health outcomes both now and for future generations.


Subject(s)
Dietetics/standards , Health Promotion/standards , Pediatric Obesity/prevention & control , Primary Prevention/standards , Academies and Institutes , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Dietetics/methods , Female , Health Promotion/methods , Humans , Male , Nutrition Policy , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Program Development , Systematic Reviews as Topic
7.
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) ; 22(9): 680-685, 2021 09 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34714258

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Despite the well established role of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) as a diagnostic gatekeeper, the yield of subsequent invasive coronary angiographies (ICA) remains low. We evaluated the adherence of CCTA integration in clinical management and primary prevention therapy. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients referred for ICA after CCTA without known coronary artery disease (CAD) or structural cardiac pathologies. Based on computed tomography (CT) findings, patients were classified as appropriately or inappropriately referred to ICA, equaling Coronary Artery Disease - Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS) categories 0-2 (<50% stenosis) and 3-5 (>50% stenosis), respectively. CT exams were compared regarding invasive findings and revascularizations. Integration of CT results into primary prevention measures was analyzed and compared to measures taken after ICA. RESULTS: Of 1005 patients referred for ICA, 81 (8.1%) had no obstructive CT findings and therefore no ICA indication. ICA inappropriate patients did not differ in symptom characteristics, but had a significantly lower revascularization rate (3.7% vs. 42.1%, P < 0.0001) compared with patients appropriately referred to ICA. In patients with indication for lipid-lowering therapy after the CCTA statin rate was 53.1% and significantly increased after ICA to 76.4% (P < 0.0001). In CCTA, obstructive findings in proximal-only lesions did not increase the revascularization rate (45.6% vs. 42.1%, P = 0.11) but missed nonproximal relevant stenoses (15.0% vs. 2.5%, P < 0.0001) compared with obstructive findings in all segments. CONCLUSION: The overall rate of inappropriateness was low, but there is relevant statin underutilization in eligible patients due to a lack of CT findings integration. Both ICA referrals and primary preventive therapy could be improved by the implementation of CT results based on CAD-RADS recommendations.


Subject(s)
Computed Tomography Angiography , Coronary Angiography , Coronary Artery Disease , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Medical Overuse , Primary Prevention , Austria/epidemiology , Computed Tomography Angiography/methods , Computed Tomography Angiography/statistics & numerical data , Coronary Angiography/methods , Coronary Angiography/statistics & numerical data , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Artery Disease/epidemiology , Coronary Artery Disease/prevention & control , Female , Health Services Needs and Demand , Humans , Male , Medical Overuse/prevention & control , Medical Overuse/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Primary Prevention/methods , Primary Prevention/standards , Primary Prevention/statistics & numerical data , Referral and Consultation/standards , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data
8.
Open Heart ; 8(2)2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34462328

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To compare the population proportion at high risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) using the Norwegian NORRISK 1 that predicts 10-year risk of CVD mortality and the Norwegian national guidelines from 2009, with the updated NORRISK 2 that predicts 10-year risk of both fatal and non-fatal risk of CVD and the Norwegian national guidelines from 2017. METHODS: We included participants from the Norwegian population-based Tromsø Study (2015-2016) aged 40-69 years without a history of CVD (n=16 566). The total proportion eligible for intervention was identified by NORRISK 1 and the 2009 guidelines (serum total cholesterol ≥8 mmol/L, systolic blood pressure ≥160 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure ≥100 mm Hg) and NORRISK 2 and the 2017 guidelines (serum total cholesterol ≥7 mmol/L, low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol ≥5 mmol/L, systolic blood pressure ≥160 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure ≥100 mm Hg). RESULTS: The total proportion at high risk as defined by a risk score was 12.0% using NORRISK 1 and 9.8% using NORRISK 2. When including single risk factors specified by the guidelines, the total proportion eligible for intervention was 15.5% using NORRISK 1 and the 2009 guidelines and 18.9% using NORRISK 2 and the 2017 guidelines. The lowered threshold for total cholesterol and specified cut-off for LDL cholesterol stand for a large proportion of the increase in population at risk. CONCLUSION: The population proportion eligible for intervention increased by 3.4 percentage points from 2009 to 2017 using the revised NORRISK 2 score and guidelines.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Population Surveillance/methods , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Primary Prevention/standards , Risk Assessment/methods , Adult , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Morbidity/trends , Norway/epidemiology , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate/trends , Time Factors
9.
NASN Sch Nurse ; 36(5): 292-299, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34340585

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic altered traditional education models and school nursing practice during the 2020-2021 school year. As schools plan to reopen for the 2021-2022 school year, school nurses must arm themselves with the most recent evidence-based knowledge and tools to promote the health and safety of the school community. Schools will need to continue infection control measures and strategies to support the social emotional needs of students and staff to promote a safe and healthy learning environment on return to school. Partnered with local health departments, school nurses are vital to mitigation measures such as on-site viral testing and vaccination. A successful school year depends on strong nursing leadership.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/psychology , Nursing Staff/psychology , Pandemics/prevention & control , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Primary Prevention/standards , School Nursing/standards , Adolescent , Adult , Attitude of Health Personnel , COVID-19/epidemiology , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , SARS-CoV-2 , United States/epidemiology , Vaccination
10.
Prog Cardiovasc Dis ; 68: 2-6, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34371083

ABSTRACT

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States (U.S.) and incurs significant cost to the healthcare system. Management of cholesterol remains central for ASCVD prevention and has been the focus of multiple national guidelines. In this review, we compare the American Heart Association (AHA)/American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) Cholesterol guidelines. We review the evidence base that was used to generate recommendations focusing on 4 distinct themes: 1) the threshold of absolute 10-year ASCVD risk to start a clinician-patient discussion for the initiation of statin therapy in primary prevention patients; 2) the utility of coronary artery calcium score to guide clinician-patient risk discussion pertaining to the initiation of statin therapy for primary ASCVD prevention; 3) the use of moderate versus high-intensity statin therapy in patients with established ASCVD; and 4) the utility of ordering lipid panels after initiation or intensification of lipid lowering therapy to document efficacy and monitor adherence to lipid lowering therapy. We discuss why the VA/DoD and AHA/ACC may have reached different conclusions on these key issues.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Cholesterol/blood , Dyslipidemias/drug therapy , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Military Medicine/standards , Primary Prevention/standards , Secondary Prevention/standards , Biomarkers/blood , Cardiovascular Diseases/diagnosis , Cardiovascular Diseases/mortality , Clinical Decision-Making , Consensus , Drug Monitoring/standards , Dyslipidemias/blood , Dyslipidemias/diagnosis , Dyslipidemias/mortality , Heart Disease Risk Factors , Humans , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Protective Factors , Risk Assessment , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , United States/epidemiology , United States Department of Defense , United States Department of Veterans Affairs
11.
J Clin Epidemiol ; 139: 160-166, 2021 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34400257

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Recommendations for preventing cardiovascular (CV) disease are currently separated into primary and secondary prevention. We hypothesize that relative effects of interventions for CV prevention are not different across primary and secondary prevention cohorts. Our aim was to test for differences in relative effects on CV events in common preventive CV interventions across primary and secondary prevention cohorts. METHODS AND RESULTS: A systematic search was performed to identify individual patient data (IPD) meta-analyses that included both primary and secondary prevention populations. Eligibility assessment, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were conducted independently and in duplicate. We extracted relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) of the interventions over patient-important outcomes and estimated the ratio of RR for primary and secondary prevention populations. We identified five eligible IPDs representing 524,570 participants. Quality assessment resulted in overall low-to-moderate methodological quality. We found no subgroup effect across prevention categories in any of the outcomes assessed. CONCLUSION: In the absence of significant treatment-subgroup interactions between primary and secondary CV prevention cohorts for common preventive interventions, clinical practice guidelines could offer recommendations tailored to individual estimates of CV risk without regard to membership to primary and secondary prevention cohorts. This would require the development of reliable ASCVD risk estimators that apply across both cohorts.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Primary Prevention/methods , Primary Prevention/standards , Secondary Prevention/methods , Secondary Prevention/standards , Humans
13.
BMJ ; 373: n776, 2021 05 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33947652

ABSTRACT

First developed in 1990, the Agatston coronary artery calcium (CAC) score is an international guideline-endorsed decision aid for further risk assessment and personalized management in the primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. This review discusses key international studies that have informed this 30 year journey, from an initial coronary plaque screening paradigm to its current role informing personalized shared decision making. Special attention is paid to the prognostic value of a CAC score of zero (the so called "power of zero"), which, in a context of low estimated risk thresholds for the consideration of preventive therapy with statins in current guidelines, may be used to de-risk individuals and thereby inform the safe delay or avoidance of certain preventive therapies. We also evaluate current recommendations for CAC scoring in clinical practice guidelines around the world, and past and prevailing barriers for its use in routine patient care. Finally, we discuss emerging approaches in this field, with a focus on the potential role of CAC informing not only the personalized allocation of statins and aspirin in the general population, but also of other risk-reduction therapies in special populations, such as individuals with diabetes and people with severe hypercholesterolemia.


Subject(s)
Atherosclerosis/prevention & control , Calcium/analysis , Coronary Vessels/chemistry , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Primary Prevention/standards , Atherosclerosis/diagnosis , Atherosclerosis/epidemiology , Computed Tomography Angiography , Coronary Angiography , Coronary Vessels/diagnostic imaging , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Humans , Hypercholesterolemia/epidemiology , Mass Screening/methods , Mass Screening/standards , Review Literature as Topic , Risk Assessment/methods , Risk Factors
14.
Can J Cardiol ; 37(8): 1129-1150, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33781847

ABSTRACT

The 2021 guidelines primary panel selected clinically relevant questions and produced updated recommendations, on the basis of important new findings that have emerged since the 2016 guidelines. In patients with clinical atherosclerosis, abdominal aortic aneurysm, most patients with diabetes or chronic kidney disease, and those with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol ≥ 5 mmol/L, statin therapy continues to be recommended. We have introduced the concept of lipid/lipoprotein treatment thresholds for intensifying lipid-lowering therapy with nonstatin agents, and have identified the secondary prevention patients who have been shown to derive the largest benefit from intensification of therapy with these agents. For all other patients, we emphasize risk assessment linked to lipid/lipoprotein evaluation to optimize clinical decision-making. Lipoprotein(a) measurement is now recommended once in a patient's lifetime, as part of initial lipid screening to assess cardiovascular risk. For any patient with triglycerides ˃ 1.5 mmol/L, either non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol or apolipoprotein B are the preferred lipid parameter for screening, rather than low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. We provide updated recommendations regarding the role of coronary artery calcium scoring as a clinical decision tool to aid the decision to initiate statin therapy. There are new recommendations on the preventative care of women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Health behaviour modification, including regular exercise and a heart-healthy diet, remain the cornerstone of cardiovascular disease prevention. These guidelines are intended to provide a platform for meaningful conversation and shared-decision making between patient and care provider, so that individual decisions can be made for risk screening, assessment, and treatment.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Dyslipidemias/therapy , Adult , Apolipoproteins B/blood , Cholesterol, HDL/blood , Cholesterol, LDL/blood , Dietary Supplements , Eicosapentaenoic Acid/analogs & derivatives , Eicosapentaenoic Acid/therapeutic use , Ezetimibe/therapeutic use , Female , Health Behavior , Humans , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , PCSK9 Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications , Primary Prevention/standards , Risk Assessment , Secondary Prevention/standards
15.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 104(3): 884-897, 2021 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33534743

ABSTRACT

Growing evidence suggests current water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions do not improve domestic hygiene sufficiently to improve infant health, nor consider the age-specific behaviors which increase infection risk. A household playspace (HPS) is described as one critical intervention to reduce direct fecal-oral transmission within formative growth periods. This article details both the design and development (materials and methods), and testing (results) of a HPS for rural Ethiopian households. Design and testing followed a multi-sectoral, multistep participatory process. This included a focus group discussion (FGD), two user-centered and participatory design workshops in the United Kingdom and Ethiopia, discussions with local manufacturers, and a Trials by Improved Practices (TIPs) leading to a final prototype design. Testing included the FGD and TIPs study and a subsequent randomized controlled feasibility trial in Ethiopian households. This multi-sectoral, multistage development process demonstrated a HPS is an acceptable and feasible intervention in these low-income, rural subsistence Ethiopian households. A HPS may help reduce fecal-oral transmission and infection-particularly in settings where free-range domestic livestock present an increased risk. With the need to better tailor interventions to improve infant health, this article also provides a framework for future groups developing similar material inputs and highlights the value of participatory design in this field.


Subject(s)
Equipment Design/standards , Family Characteristics , Infant Health/standards , Primary Prevention/methods , Primary Prevention/standards , Sanitation/methods , Sanitation/standards , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Ethiopia , Female , Focus Groups , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Rural Population , United Kingdom
16.
PLoS One ; 16(1): e0245766, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33497407

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: There is a relationship between pesticide exposure and farmworkers' health. Well-conducted evaluations can provide an insight into how to develop and implement more effective interventions to prevent farmers and farmworkers' exposure to pesticides. This review aimed to summarize the literature on the effectiveness of interventions to promote pesticide safety and reduce pesticide exposure among farmers and farmworkers. METHODS: A comprehensive search on PubMed, Embase, ISI Web of Science, Scopus, Science Direct, Agricola, NIOSHTIC, and Agris databases was performed to identify relevant studies published from 2000 to 2019. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-experimental studies assessing the effectiveness of interventions on a variety of outcomes related to pesticide exposure were considered. The searches were restricted to articles written in English. The methodological quality of included reviews was appraised using the Effective Public Health Practice Project quality assessment tool (EPHPP). RESULTS: The initial search led to 47912 records, 31 studies of which including nine RCTs and twenty-two quasi-experimental studies met the criteria. The majority of the included studies focused on the educational/ behavioral approach. The studies that applied this approach were effective in improving the participants' knowledge and attitude; however, these interventions were less effective in terms of making changes in participants' behaviors and their risk of exposure to toxic pesticides. Multifaceted interventions were moderately effective in terms of improving farmers' and farmworkers' behaviors and reduction in exposure to toxic pesticides. We did not find any studies that had evaluated the effectiveness of engineering/technological, and legislation/enforcement interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Although the majority of studies were based on an educational/behavioral approach and did not assess the effect of interventions on objective measures, the results of this review highlight the significant effectiveness of educational programs and some potential key elements of these interventions. These findings may inform policymakers to develop interventions to reduce pesticide exposure among farmers and farmworkers.


Subject(s)
Agricultural Workers' Diseases/prevention & control , Farmers/statistics & numerical data , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Pesticides/toxicity , Primary Prevention/standards , Agricultural Workers' Diseases/epidemiology , Agricultural Workers' Diseases/etiology , Farmers/education , Farmers/psychology , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Occupational Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Primary Prevention/methods , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
19.
Rev. chil. pediatr ; 91(5): 800-808, oct. 2020. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1144281

ABSTRACT

Los trastornos de la conducta alimentaria (TCA) han adquirido relevancia en la pediatría chilena. Su tratamiento debe ser realizado, de preferencia, por equipos multidisciplinarios especializados o con alto grado de capacitación en la problemática. Sin embargo, los pediatras generales tienen un rol fundamental tanto en la prevención como en la pesquisa temprana de estas patologías. El objetivo de esta publicación es proporcionarles recomendaciones prácticas sobre las intervenciones que pueden llevar a cabo durante la atención de adolescentes, para la prevención de los TCA, la pesquisa precoz y evaluación de quienes ya los presentan, y su derivación oportuna a tratamiento especializado.


Eating disorders (ED) have become relevant in Chilean pediatrics. Their treatment must be prefe rably carried out by multidisciplinary teams with specialty or a high degree of training in the pro blem. However, general pediatricians have a fundamental role both in the prevention and in the early detection of these pathologies. The purpose of this publication is to provide them with practical recommendations on interventions that can be carried out during adolescent care for the prevention of ED, the early detection and evaluation of those who already have them, and their timely referral to specialized treatment.


Subject(s)
Humans , Adolescent , Pediatrics/methods , Pediatrics/standards , Physician's Role/psychology , Feeding and Eating Disorders/diagnosis , Feeding and Eating Disorders/etiology , Feeding and Eating Disorders/psychology , Feeding and Eating Disorders/therapy , Pediatricians/standards , Pediatricians/psychology , Patient Care Team , Physical Examination/methods , Physical Examination/standards , Physician-Patient Relations , Primary Prevention/methods , Primary Prevention/standards , Referral and Consultation , Chile , Risk Factors , Early Diagnosis , Diagnosis, Differential , Medical History Taking/methods , Medical History Taking/standards
20.
Adv Skin Wound Care ; 33(10S Suppl 1): S11-S22, 2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32932290

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A continuing complication, pressure injuries are due to sustained mechanical loading and tissue deformations, which can then be exacerbated by additional intrinsic and extrinsic risk factors. Although support surfaces are designed to mitigate risk factors for pressure injuries, the presence of a turn and position device (TPD) between the patient and support surface may interfere with how support surfaces affect these risk factors. OBJECTIVE: Report the use of the NPIAP's S3I standard test methods to characterize the performance of a support surface when used in conjunction with three different TPDs. DESIGN: Laboratory testing compared three TPDs for Immersion, Envelopment, and Horizontal Stiffness in each of five surface combinations. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Immersion test measures how far mannequin indenter immerses into surface. Envelopment test measures immersion and pressure distribution with hemispherical-indenter with mounted sensor rings. Horizontal Stiffness test measures the shear modulus of the support surface with epicondyle indenter. MAIN RESULTS: For the specific TPDs tested here, the one with an adjustable integrated air bladder improved rather than compromised both the envelopment and the immersion of the support surface alone. Additionally, this TPD provided potential protection against sliding and the associated frictional shear forces. CONCLUSIONS: This paper describes how TPDs should perform in order to help establish which features are needed in a new medical device of this type. Laboratory testing demonstrates it is possible to improve performance of a support surface by applying a TPD as an add-on, thus relieving tissue deformation exposure through more effective pressure redistribution.


Subject(s)
Manikins , Patient Positioning , Pressure Ulcer/prevention & control , Primary Prevention/standards , Protective Devices/standards , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...