Metabolic Disorders During Prolactinomas.

The metabolic profile during prolactinoma may be subject to significant changes. We aimed to describe the different metabolic aspects in patients monitored for prolactinoma and to study the correlations between the size of the prolactinoma and the metabolic parameters. We conducted a retrospective, descriptive, and analytical study of 77 cases of prolactinomas collected and monitored at the endocrinology and diabetology department of the Hedi Chaker Hospital in Sfax between 2000 and 2017. Our patients were divided into three groups according to the size of their prolactinomas. Statistical correlations were sought between tumor size and clinical and biological parameters. The mean age of our patients was 38.3 ± 14.2 years. They were divided into 51 women (66.2%) and 26 men (33.7%). Pituitary tumor syndrome was the most common circumstance of discovery in our population (62.3%). The clinical examination revealed an average waist circumference of 95.71 cm. Android fat distribution was observed in 25 women (49%) and 12 men (46.1%). A statistically significant positive correlation was objectified between waist circumference and tumor size (r = 0.29 and P = 0.019). The average body mass index was 28.08 kg/m2. Obesity was noted in 56 cases (72.7%). Glucose tolerance disorders and hypertriglyceridemia were also more evident each time prolactinoma size increased in contrast to the level of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol which decreased with adenoma size. Our study highlighted the metabolic and hormonal repercussions of prolactinomas. Metabolic syndrome was more common in patients with larger prolactinoma. These results should guide the initial assessment and therapeutic management of prolactin adenomas.

Genetic testing in prolactinomas: a cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Prolactinomas represent 46%-66% of pituitary adenomas, but the prevalence of germline mutations is largely unknown. We present here the first study focusing on hereditary predisposition to prolactinoma. OBJECTIVE: We studied the prevalence of germline mutations in a large cohort of patients with isolated prolactinomas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was performed combining genetic and clinical data from patients referred for genetic testing of MEN1, AIP, and CDKN1B between 2003 and 2020. SF3B1 was Sanger sequenced in genetically negative patients. RESULTS: About 506 patients with a prolactinoma were included: 80 with microprolactinoma (15.9%), 378 with macroprolactinoma (74.7%), 48 unknown; 49/506 in a familial context (9.7%). Among these, 14 (2.8%) had a (likely) pathogenic variant (LPV) in MEN1 or AIP, and none in CDKN1B. All positive patients had developed a macroprolactinoma before age 30. The prevalence of germline mutations in patients with isolated macroprolactinoma under 30 was 4% (11/258) in a sporadic context and 15% (3/20) in a familial context. Prevalence in sporadic cases younger than 18 was 15% in men (5/33) and 7% in women (4/57). No R625H SF3B1 germline mutation was identified in 264 patients with macroprolactinomas. CONCLUSIONS: We did not identify any LPVs in patients over 30 years of age, either in a familial or in a sporadic context, and in a sporadic context in our series or the literature. Special attention should be paid to young patients and to familial context.

Pituitary adenomas registry in Thailand.

PURPOSE: Pituitary adenomas are the most common sellar tumors, and may cause adverse outcomes in terms of morbidity and mortality if left untreated or if diagnosis is delayed. No data exists on the prevalence, characteristics, and prognosis of pituitary adenomas in Thailand. The systematic registration of clinical characteristics may improve patient care and prognosis for this disease in Thailand. METHODS: This was a retrospective study conducted in 11 academic referral centers. All patients diagnosed with pituitary adenomas during the 2011---2014 period were enrolled in the study. The information was correlated with two national databases. RESULTS: A total of 1,283 pituitary adenoma patients were identified. The adenomas were: non-functioning 50.1%, prolactinoma 29.4%, acromegaly 14.7%, Cushing disease 3.8%, gonadotropin-producing tumor 1.0%, TSH-secreting tumor 0.6%. The mean age was 49.2±15.2 years. Sixty-three percent of patients were female. Most common complaint was visual impairment (27.7%). The average size of the tumor was 22.2±16.1 mm. Fifty-nine percent of patients underwent surgery. Median follow-up was 27.4 months (0-24 years). After treatment, 72.4% improved, and 10.4% were cured. Overall results of treatment in non-functioning adenoma, prolactinoma (medically treated), acromegaly, Cushing, TSH, gonadotropin producing adenoma were: improved/cured in 81/5.5, 86/5.7, 55.9/30, 54.2/31.2, 85.7/14.3, 69.2/15.4% respectively. CONCLUSION: Pituitary adenomas in academic centers in Thailand were found predominantly in female in the 4th decade of life. After treatment 72.4% of patients improved and 10% had full recovery. A health promotion system aimed to improve patient and physician recognition and physician expertise may improve the prognosis of these diseases.

Clinical course of autoimmune thyroid diseases in women with prolactinomas: Results from a prospective study in a single tertiary centre.

INTRODUCTION: Several retrospective and cross-sectional studies have revealed a higher prevalence of autoimmune thyroid diseases (AITD) with a predominance of autoimmune hypothyroidism in prolactinoma patients compared to the general population. To date, we have no data on the clinical course of AITD in these patients. The aim of this prospective study was to assess the clinical course of AITD in female patients with prolactinomas compared to an age- and thyroid-risk factors-matched control group. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study population consisted of 144 females (71 patients/73 controls) who underwent approximately a 6-year follow-up. Physical examination, thyroid ultrasound and laboratory testing (measurement of antibodies to thyroglobulin, thyroid peroxidase, TSH-receptor; serum TSH and FT4 levels) were performed twice - at the baseline and at the follow-up visits. RESULTS: AITD were diagnosed in 26.8% (n=19) of the patients and 9.6% (n=7) of the controls (p=0.007) at baseline visit. At the end of the follow-up (FU), these percentages increased to 33.8% (n=24) among the patients versus 12.3% (n=9) in the control group (p=0.002). Hypothyroidism was significantly more frequent in prolactinoma patients than in controls at the end of the study (19.7% vs. 4.1%; p=0.003). Two prolactinoma patients had hyperthyroidism at the baseline visit and restored euthyroid state with negative TSH-receptor antibodies during the follow-up. We did not observe hyperthyroidism in the control group. Among the hypothyroid subsets, the average daily levothyroxine dose at FU visit varied from 25 to 200mcg in the prolactinoma group compared to 25 to 50mcg in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Female patients with prolactinomas seem to be prone to autoimmune hypothyroidism. As a pathogenetic mechanism, we could suggest the selective immunomodulatory action of PRL predominantly on cell autoimmunity, complement activation and antibody-dependent cytotoxicity, resulting in earlier and more rapid progression of Hashimoto's thyroiditis towards hypothyroid state in genetically predisposed individuals.

Incidentalomas o no incidentalomas: ¿cuál es la relevancia de los adenomas hipofisarios en el adulto? / Incidentalomas or Non-Incidentalomas: What is the Relevance of Pituitary Adenomas in the Adult?

Introducción: desde el punto de vista anatómico, los adenomas hipofisarios (AH) se observan en el 10% de la población. Son en su mayoría pequeños y no funcionantes. La mayoría de los incidentalomas descubiertos en estudios de imágenes con alta resolución pedidos en situaciones clínicas frecuentes, como el traumatismo craneoencefálico, el accidente cerebrovascular y las demencias, corresponden a AH indolentes. Nos preguntamos cuál es la relevancia clínica de los adenomas hipofisarios. Desarrollo: los AH clínicamente relevantes son tumores en su mayoría benignos que conllevan, en diferentes proporciones, aumento en la morbilidad y/o mortalidad de los pacientes por mecanismos relacionados con la hipersecreción hormonal, la insuficiencia hormonal y/o los efectos de masa ocupante. La prevalencia de los AH clínicamente relevantes es mayor de la que se suponía hace 20 años. Afecta aproximadamente a 1/1000 habitantes. Los más prevalentes son los prolactinomas y los adenomas no funcionantes. La acromegalia, la enfermedad de Cushing y los tumores agresivos se traducen en pacientes complejos con mayor morbimortalidad. El diagnóstico temprano y el tratamiento multimodal proveen una razonable mejoría de la sobrevida. El estudio epidemiológico de los AH clínicamente relevantes es importante para la estimación del impacto en los sistemas de salud. Conclusiones: los estudios por imágenes de mejor resolución continuarán señalando incidentalomas hipofisarios. Una evaluación cuidadosa de los pacientes podrá identificar aquellos AH clínicamente relevantes. (AU)

Introduction: from the anatomical point of view, pituitary adenomas (HA) are observed in 10% of the population. They are mostly small and non-functioning. Most incidentalomas discovered in high-resolution imaging studies ordered in frequent clinical situations, such as head trauma, stroke and dementia, correspond to indolent HA. We wonder what is the clinical relevance of pituitary adenomas. Development: clinically relevant HAs are mostly benign tumors that lead, in different degrees, to an increased morbidity and/or mortality in patients by mechanisms related to hormone hypersecretion, hormone insufficiency and/or occupying mass effects. The prevalence of clinically relevant HA is higher from what was assumed 20 years ago. It affects approximately 1/1000 of the population. The most prevalent are prolactinomas and non-functioning adenomas. Acromegaly, Cushing's disease and aggressive tumors make for complex patients with increased morbidity and mortality. Early diagnosis and multimodal treatment provide a reasonable improvement in survival. Epidemiological study of clinically relevant HAs is important for estimating the impact on health systems. Conclusions: Higher-resolution imaging studies will continue to highlight pituitary incidentalomas. Careful evaluation of patients will identify clinically relevant HAs. (AU)

The side effects of dopamine receptor agonist drugs in Chinese prolactinoma patients: a cross sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Recently, side effects from Dopamine Receptor Agonist Drugs (DAs) in treating pituitary prolactinoma have raised widespread concern. This study explores the incidence and influencing factors of DAs-related side effects in Chinese prolactinoma patients. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted. 51 prolactinoma patients treated with DAs, 12 prolactinoma or pituitary microadenoma patients without DAs treatment, and 33 healthy controls were included. The Barratt impulsivity scale-11, Patient Health Questionnaire 9, and the ICD screening questionnaire were all used to evaluate the psychological and physical side effects of DAs. Clinical data of all subjects were collected from their electronic medical records. RESULTS: The incidence of ICDs in the treated group, the untreated group, and control group was 9.8% (5/51), 16.7% (2/12), and 9.1% (3/33), respectively. In the treated group in particular, there were 1 patient (2%, 1/51), 2 patients (3.9%, 2/51), and 2 patients (3.9%, 2/51) with positive screening for punding, compulsive shopping, and hypersexuality, respectively. In terms of depression, the incidence of "minimal", "mild" and "moderate" depression in the treated group was 62.8% (32/51), 25.5% (13/51), and 5.9% (3/51), respectively. The incidence of physical symptoms was 51.0% (26/51) in the treated group and gastrointestinal symptoms were the most common symptoms (33.3%, 17/51). In addition, we found that the various parameters of DAs treatment had no association with the occurrence of physical symptoms or ICDs (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Chinese prolactinoma patients treated with DAs had a lower incidence of ICDs (9.8%), while gastrointestinal symptoms were common. In this way, more attention should be paid to side effects, especially physical symptoms, in Chinese prolactinoma patients with DAs therapy during follow-up regardless of dose.

Prevalence of Hyperprolactinemia and Clinically Apparent Prolactinomas in Men Undergoing Fertility Evaluation.

OBJECTIVE: To determine prevalence of hyperprolactinemia and prolactinoma among men presenting for initial fertility evaluation. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of men presenting for initial fertility evaluation at a tertiary care, academic health system between 1999 and 2018. Men with measured prolactin levels were analyzed to determine prevalence of hyperprolactinemia and prolactinoma. We compared clinical characteristics of men with and without hyperprolactinemia. Univariable and multivariable analysis were used to determine factors associated with hyperprolactinemia. We assessed effects of hyperprolactinemia and prolactinoma on testosterone levels, semen parameters and pregnancy outcomes after treatment. RESULTS: A total of 3101 men had serum prolactin level measured. 65 (2.1%) had hyperprolactinemia. Patients with hyperprolactinemia had lower testosterone (median 280 ng/dL vs 313 ng/dL, P = 0.038) and lower total motile sperm count (median 7.0 million vs 34.7 million, P = 0.001) compared to men without hyperprolactinemia. 43.1% of men with hyperprolactinemia had oligospermia vs 21.5% of men without hyperprolactinemia (P<0.001). Univariable analysis demonstrated that men with elevated luteinizing hormone (LH) (OR 1.077, P = 0.001) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) (OR 1.032, P = 0.002) were more likely to have hyperprolactinemia. Men with oligospermia were more likely to have hyperprolactinemia (OR 2.334, P = 0.004). On multivariable analysis, neither hormone parameters nor oligospermia were associated with elevated prolactin (P>0.05). Of the 65 men with hyperprolactinemia, 11 (17%) were diagnosed with a prolactinoma, resulting in an overall prevalence of 11 in 3101 (0.35%). CONCLUSION: The overall prevalence of prolactinoma in our cohort of men undergoing fertility evaluation was 35-fold higher than the prevalence in the general male population.

Prolactinomas.

Hyperprolactinemia, defined by a level of serum prolactin above the standard upper limit of normal range, is a common finding in clinical practice and prolactinomas are the main pathological cause. Prolactinomas lead to signs and symptoms of hormone oversecretion, such as galactorrhea and hypogonadism, as well as symptoms of mass effect, including visual impairment, headaches and intracranial hypertension. Diagnosis involves prolactin measurement and sellar imaging, but several pitfalls are involved in this evaluation, which may difficult the proper management. Treatment is medical in the majority of cases, consisting of dopamine agonists, which present high response rates, with a very favorable safety profile. Major adverse effects that should be monitored consist of cardiac valvulopathy and impulse control disorders. Other treatment options include surgery and radiotherapy. Temozolomide may be used for aggressive or malignant carcinomas. Finally, pregnancy outcomes are similar to general population even when dopamine agonist treatment is maintained.

Descriptive Epidemiology and Survival Analysis of Prolactinomas and Cushing's Disease in Korea.

BACKGROUND: Only a few studies have established the epidemiology of prolactinoma and Cushing's disease in Korea. Furthermore, the incidence of these disease are increasing than before associated with the development of technologies. This study was designed to evaluate the epidemiology of prolactinoma and Cushing's disease and their survival analysis according to treatment. METHODS: The nationwide, population-based study evaluated incidence and prevalence of prolactinoma and Cushing's disease using de-identified claims data in The Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database between 2013 and 2017. The survival analysis investigated regarding treatment over a period of 6 years. A log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard regression analysis were used. RESULTS: The 6,056 patients with newly diagnosed prolactinoma and 584 patients with Cushing's disease were recorded between 2013 and 2017. The annual incidence of prolactinoma was 23.5 cases per million, and its prevalence was 82.5 cases per million, and 2.3 cases per million/year and 9.8 cases per million for Cushing's disease. The survival benefit was insignificant in prolactinoma according to treatment, but treatment of Cushing's disease ameliorated the survival rate significantly. CONCLUSION: Overall, the incidence of prolactinoma and Cushing's disease was similar with those found previously, but the prevalence of two diseases were inconsistent when compared with the early studies. The present study also proposed necessity of treatment in Cushing's disease for improving the survival rate.

Association Between Prolactinoma and Body Mass Index.

OBJECTIVE: Obesity is increasing worldwide, and certain endocrine disorders may contribute to weight gain. While several studies have examined the association between weight gain and prolactinomas, the results are conflicting. Therefore, this study aimed to determine if body mass index (BMI) is higher among those with prolactinomas than those without. METHODS: We identified patients ≥18 years of age referred to an endocrine clinic between 2008 and 2018 with newly diagnosed prolactinomas. We extracted the relevant information, and comparative data was obtained from the 2015-2016 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. RESULTS: In total, 34 cases met the inclusion criteria. One third of the patients described weight gain at presentation. Those with prolactinomas had a significantly higher BMI than the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey population (median BMI, 29.8 kg/m2 vs 28.3 kg/m2, P = .0048). When stratified by sex, only men with prolactinomas had an increased BMI compared with the controls. Moreover, those with prolactinomas had a higher prevalence of class II obesity (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2) than the survey population (35% vs 18%, P = .01). Among the prolactinoma patients, a correlation was observed between BMI and log-transformed prolactin levels (R2 = 0.4, P = .0002). CONCLUSION: Weight gain can be a presenting symptom for patients with newly diagnosed prolactinomas. Those with prolactinomas have a higher BMI and an increased prevalence of class II obesity. These findings suggest that patients should be counseled regarding weight issues related to prolactinomas at presentation and should be a consideration in the investigative and treatment algorithm of prolactinomas.

Our experience in prolactinomas larger than 60mm / Nuestra experiencia en prolactinomas mayores de 60mm

INTRODUCTION: Giant prolactinomas (tumor size larger than 40mm) are a rare entity of benign nature. Prolactinomas larger than 60mm are usually underrepresented in published studies and their clinical presentation, outcomes and management might be different from smaller giant prolactinomas. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospective collected data from patients with prolactinomas larger than 60mm in maximum diameter and prolactin (PRL) serum levels higher than 21,200μIU/mL in our series of prolactinomas (283). Data were collected from January 2012 to December 2017. We included three patients with prolactinomas larger than 60mm. RESULTS: At diagnosis, two patients presented neurological symptoms and one nasal protrusion. All patients received medical treatment with dopamine agonists. No surgical procedure was performed. Median prolactin levels at diagnosis was 108,180 [52,594-514,984]μIU/mL. Medical treatment achieved a marked reduction (>99%) in prolactin levels in all cases. Tumor size reduction (higher than 33%) was observed in all cases. In one patient cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak was observed after tumor shrinkage. CONCLUSIONS: Dopamine agonists appear to be an effective and safe first-line treatment in prolactinomas larger than 60mm even in life-threatening situations. More studies with a higher number of patients are necessary to obtain enough data to make major recommendations

INTRODUCCIÓN: Los prolactinomas gigantes (de tamaño superior a 40mm) son una entidad rara de naturaleza benigna. Los prolactinomas mayores de 60mm suelen estar infrarrepresentados en los estudios publicados, y su presentación clínica, resultados y tratamiento podrían ser diferentes de los de prolactinomas gigantes más pequeños. PACIENTES Y MÉTODOS: Recogimos retrospectivamente datos de pacientes con prolactinomas de más de 60mm de diámetro máximo y con concentraciones séricas de prolactina (PRL) superiores a 21.200μIU/ml de nuestra serie de prolactinomas (283). Los datos se recogieron entre enero de 2012 y diciembre de 2017. Se incluyeron 3 pacientes con prolactinomas mayores de 60mm. RESULTADOS: En el momento del diagnóstico, 2 pacientes presentaban síntomas neurológicos, y uno protrusión nasal. Todos los pacientes recibieron tratamiento médico con agonistas dopaminérgicos. No se realizó ninguna intervención quirúrgica. La mediana de las concentraciones de PRL al diagnóstico fue de 108.180 (52.594-514.984)μIU/ml. El tratamiento médico logró una reducción notable (>99%) de los valores de prolactina en todos los casos. En todos los casos se observó una reducción del tamaño del tumor (superior al 33%). En un paciente se observó una fuga de líquido cefalorraquídeo (LCR) tras la reducción del tumor. CONCLUSIÓN: Los agonistas dopaminérgicos parecen ser un tratamiento de primera línea eficaz y seguro en los prolactinomas mayores de 60mm incluso en situaciones peligrosas para la vida. Se necesitan más estudios con un mayor número de pacientes para obtener datos suficientes para hacer recomendaciones importantes

The risks of medical treatment of prolactinoma.

First-line treatment of prolactinoma is usually medical, based on dopamine agonists receptors, mainly cabergoline. The classical side-effects of cabergoline (low blood pressure and nausea) have been well known since it was first introduced. Other side-effects, however, are more controversial or simply less frequent, but need to be considered during monitoring. This review will focus on these side-effects: cardiac valvular fibrosis, pleural, pericardial and retroperitoneal fibrosis, addictive/compulsive behaviors, and risks secondary to significantly decreased tumor volume. We will also describe how such side-effects should be monitored and managed. In our opinion, the low prevalence of these side-effects should not cast doubt on the role of cabergoline in the therapeutic algorithm of prolactinoma.

Incidence of Cabergoline-Associated Valvulopathy in Primary Care Patients With Prolactinoma Using Hard Cardiac Endpoints.

BACKGROUND: Controversy exists as to whether low-dose cabergoline is associated with clinically significant valvulopathy. Few studies examine hard cardiac endpoint data, most relying on echocardiographic findings. OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of valve surgery or heart failure in patients taking cabergoline for prolactinoma against a matched nonexposed population. DESIGN: Population-based cohort study based on North East London primary care records. METHODS: Data were drawn from ~1.5 million patients' primary care records. We identified 646 patients taking cabergoline for >6 months for prolactinoma. These were matched to up to 5 control individuals matched for age, gender, ethnicity, location, diabetes, hypertension, ischemic heart disease, and smoking status. Cumulative doses/durations of treatment were calculated. Cardiac endpoints were defined as cardiac valve surgery or heart failure diagnosis (either diagnostic code or prescription code for associated medications). RESULTS: A total of 18 (2.8%) cabergoline-treated patients and 62 (2.33%) controls reached a cardiac endpoint. Median cumulative cabergoline dose was 56 mg (interquartile range [IQR] 27-123). Median treatment duration was 27 months (IQR 15-46). Median weekly dose was 2.1 mg. Neither univariate nor multivariate analysis demonstrated a significant association between cabergoline treatment at any cumulative dosage/duration and an increased incidence of cardiac endpoints. In a matched analysis, the relative risk for cardiac complications in the cabergoline-treated group was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.41-1.48; P = 0.446). Reanalysis of echocardiograms for 6/18 affected cabergoline-treated patients showed no evidence of ergot-derived drug valvulopathy. CONCLUSIONS: The data did not support an association between clinically significant valvulopathy and low-dose cabergoline treatment and provide further evidence for a reduction in frequency of surveillance echocardiography.

AIP variant causing familial prolactinoma.

Pathogenic variants in the aryl hydrocarbon receptor-interacting protein (AIP) gene are increasingly recognised as a cause of familial isolated pituitary adenoma. AIP-associated tumours are most commonly growth hormone (GH) producing. In our cohort of 175 AIP mutation positive patients representing 93 kindreds, 139 (79%) have GH excess, 19 have prolactinoma (17 familial and 2 sporadic cases) and out of the 17 clinically non-functioning tumours 4 were subsequently operated and found to be GH or GH & prolactin immunopositive adenoma. Here we report a family with an AIP variant, in which multiple family members are affected by prolactinoma, but none with GH excess. To our knowledge this is the first reported family with an AIP pathogenic variant to be affected solely by prolactinoma. These data suggest that prolactinoma families represent a small subset of AIP mutation positive kindreds, and similar to young-onset sporadic prolactinomas, AIP screening would be indicated.

Patients with acromegaly might not be at higher risk for dopamine agonist-induced impulse control disorders than those with prolactinomas.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence of impulse control disorders (ICD) and psychiatric symptoms in patients with acromegaly receiving dopamine agonists (DA) in comparison with those with prolactinoma, nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas (NFA), and healthy controls (HC). DESIGN: Forty patients with acromegaly, 40 with prolactinoma, 38 with NFA, and 32 HCs were included. All patients and controls were evaluated using the revised version of the Minnesota Impulsive Disorders Interview (MIDI-R), Symptom Check List (SCL-90-R) questionnaire, Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-11), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI). RESULTS: We detected ICD associated with DAs in two patients with acromegaly (5%) and three patients (7.5%) with prolactinoma. All patients' symptoms resolved after discontinuation of the drug. While the mean DA dose was higher in patients with acromegaly than prolactinomas (p < 0.05), no difference was detected in terms of ICD prevalence between two groups (p > 0.05). SCL-90 depression and interpersonal sensitivity subscale positivity was higher in patients with NFA than HCs. Patients with prolactinoma had higher obsession and interpersonal sensitivity positivity and those with NFA had higher somatization, interpersonal sensitivity, and depression positivity as compared to patients with acromegaly (p < 0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Although DA dose was significantly higher in patients with acromegaly, there was no significant difference in the prevalence of DA-related ICD. The higher prevalence of positive screening in SCL-90 in patients with NFA in comparison to HCs supports the hypothesis that the presence of a pituitary adenoma per se might cause significant psychiatric symptoms.

A single- center experience of prolactin-producing pituitary adenomas without hyperprolactinemia: Its incidence and clinical management.

OBJECTIVE: This study clarifies the incidence of prolactin-producing pituitary adenomas without hyperprolactinemia and determines the appropriate treatment strategy for these tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective analysis focused on prolactin-producing adenomas without hyperprolactinemia, which were initially treated by surgery as nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas. Among 942 patients with histologically confirmed pituitary adenoma, 114 (12.1 %) patients, consisting of 68 men and 46 women, who had prolactin-producing adenomas without hyperprolactinemia were identified between April 2005 and March 2019. RESULTS: Of the 114 patients identified, 13 (11.4 %) had prolactin mono-expressions, 18 (15.8 %) had pit-1 lineage hormonal expressions, and 83 (72.8 %) had paradoxical immunoexpression out of the pituitary differentiation lineage, including prolactin. During the follow-up period, 19 patients suffered tumor progression, and 14 required salvage treatment. Of the 19 patients, 11 underwent gamma knife radiosurgery, and none of them experienced further tumor progression. Cabergoline was administered of them to six patients, and one achieved tumor shrinkage. However, the remaining five patients who were treated with cabergoline suffered further tumor progression and required another salvage treatment. Among the patients in the prolactin mono-expression group, one experienced tumor regrowth and underwent gamma knife radiosurgery. In the pit-1 lineage group, two patients experienced tumor regrowth. One had further tumor progression after treatment with cabergoline and underwent gamma knife radiosurgery. Among the patients in the paradoxical immunoexpression group, 16 suffered tumor progression. Four patients underwent further surgery, seven patients were treated with gamma knife radiosurgery, and one patient received fractionated irradiation. None of the eight patients who were treated with gamma knife radiosurgery and fractionated irradiation showed further tumor progression. Four patients in this group were treated with cabergoline, but they all suffered further tumor progression and underwent additional salvage treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Out of the pituitary differentiation lineage, paradoxical hormonal expression occurred in three-quarters of the patients identified. Further surgery or gamma knife radiosurgery should be given priority in times of tumor progression because most patients were resistant to dopamine agonists.

Germinal defects of SDHx genes in patients with isolated pituitary adenoma.

BACKGROUND: The '3PAs' syndrome, associating pituitary adenoma (PA) and pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma (PPGL), is sometimes associated with mutations in PPGL-predisposing genes, such as SDHx or MAX. In '3PAs' syndrome, PAs can occur before PPGL, suggesting a new gateway into SDHx/MAX-related diseases. OBJECTIVE: To determine the SDHx/MAX mutation prevalence in patients with isolated PAs and characterize PAs of patients with SDHx/MAX mutations. DESIGN: Genes involved in PAs (AIP/MEN1/CDKN1B) or PPGLs (SDHx/MAX) were sequenced in patients with isolated PAs. We then conducted a review of cases of PA in the setting of '3PAs' syndrome. RESULTS: A total of 263 patients were recruited. Seven (likely) pathogenic variants were found in AIP, two in MEN1, two in SDHA, and one in SDHC. The prevalence of SDHx mutations reached 1.1% (3/263). Of 31 reported patients with PAs harboring SDHx/MAX mutations (28 published cases and 3 cases reported here), 6/31 (19%) developed PA before PPGL and 8/31 (26%) had isolated PA. The age of onset was later than in patients with AIP/MEN1 mutations. PAs were mainly macroprolactinomas and showed intracytoplasmic vacuoles seen on histopathology. CONCLUSIONS: We discovered SDHx mutations in patients bearing PA who had no familial or personal history of PPGL. However, the question of incidental association remains unresolved and data to determine the benefit of SDHx/MAX screening in these patients are lacking. We recommend that patients with isolated PA should be carefully examined for a family history of PPGLs. A family history of PPGL, as well as the presence of intracytoplasmic vacuoles in PA, requires SDHx/MAX genetic testing of patients.

Prevalence and characteristics of sellar masses in the city of Al Ain, United Arab Emirates: 2010 to 2016.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of sellar masses (SMs) is reported in Europe and North America but only limited data are available from the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. OBJECTIVES: Assess the prevalence and characteristics of SMs in Al Ain city, United Arab Emirates. DESIGN: Retrospective, descriptive multicenter study. SETTING: Three endocrine centers in Al Ain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients diagnosed with SMs in the city of Al Ain, Emirate of Abu Dhabi, between 2011 and 2016 were evaluated. Cases were identified using ICD 9 and 10 codes and demographic and clinical data were collected. The prevalence rate was calculated for patients alive and residing in Al Ain city until 31 December 2016. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical presentations and prevalence rate. SAMPLE SIZE: 272. RESULTS: The mean (SD) age on presentation was 40.8 (14.3) years (range: 6-114 years, median: 40.0). The 170 (61.8%) females and 128 (46.5%) were native citizens of the United Arab Emirates. Two hundred and forty five (90%) patients had pituitary adenomas (PAs) while 27 (10%) had non-pituitary sellar lesions. The four most common SMs were prolactinoma (n=139, 51.1%), nonfunctioning adenoma (NFA) (n= 69, 25.4%), somatotroph adenoma (n=32, 11.8%) and craniopharyngioma (n=15, 5.5%). Patients with prolactinoma, corticotroph adenoma, and Rathke's cleft cyst had small sellar masses (<1 centimeter) while the majority of patients with other SMs had macroadenomas. Hypogonadism and growth hormone deficiency was present in 41.8% and 20.5% of the patients, respectively. Of 268 patients with available data, 82 patients underwent surgery while 25 patients received radiotherapy. At the end of 2016, 197 patients were residing in Al Ain city. The overall prevalence of SMs was 25.7/100 000 with PAs constituting most of these masses (n=177) for a prevalence of 23.1/100 000. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study of SMs in the United Arab Emirates and the MENA region. Prolactinoma and NFA were the two most common SMs. Further studies are needed to explore the reasons for the lower prevalence of SMs in our region compared with other countries. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective design, relatively small sample size. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None.

Pathology of prolactinomas: any predictive value?

Lactotroph adenomas, also called prolactinomas and prolactin-secreting adenomas, constitute nearly 80% of functioning pituitary tumors and about 30-50% of all adenomas in the clinical practice. Lactotroph adenomas occur in the general population at a prevalence of 45/100,000, are more common in women, but also involve men and children of both sexes. Most lactotroph adenomas are microadenomas occurring in reproductive-age women who present with oligo/amenorrhea, galactorrhea, and infertility. In men and elderly women, lactotroph adenomas are usually macroadenomas and are most commonly associated with symptoms of a tumoral mass, including headaches, neurologic defects, and visual loss. Although clinical and laboratory features may differ depending on patient's gender and age, the histopathology of the tumors is similar. Lactotroph adenomas are histologically classified into three subtypes: the common sparsely granulated lactotroph adenoma, and the rare densely granulated lactotroph adenoma and acidophilic stem cell adenoma. We will review the main pathological features of the lactotroph adenomas and some of their characteristics that may predict biological behavior and responsiveness to treatment.