Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 215
Filter
1.
Gesundheitswesen ; 86(6): 404-411, 2024 Jun.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38467149

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Disease prevention and health promotion are among the core tasks of German public health services (Öffentlicher Gesundheitsdienst - ÖGD), particularly local public health departments (Gesundheitsämter). Little is known about the extent to which the departments were able to continue activities in the field of health promotion and prevention of non-communicable diseases (HPP-NCDs) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Using the example of public health departments in Baden-Württemberg (BW), we therefore investigated how much staff was available to the departments for HPP-NCDs services, how much staff was actually dedicated to HPP-NCDs during the COVID-19 pandemic, which HPP-NCDs activities were carried out during the pandemic, which were cancelled, and which should be resumed as a priority, according to the public health departments. METHODS: We developed a largely standardized online questionnaire for the survey of the 38 public health departments in BW. Per department one questionnaire was to be completed. The survey took place from 9/1/2022 to 11/4/2022. The data of this explorative cross-sectional study were analyzed in a descriptive-statistical manner using SPSS, version 28. RESULTS: Of the 38 departments, 34 participated in the survey (89%). Departments had a mean of 2.44 full HPP-NCDs staff as planned (median 2.00; SD 1.41; range 0.20-5.00). Under pandemic conditions, a mean of 1.23 full HPP-NCDs staff were deployed (median 0.95; SD 1.24; range 0.00-4.50). Respondents gave examples of 61 HPP-NCDs activities that were conducted under pandemic conditions, and they described 69 HPP-NCDs activities that had to be cancelled. Of the latter, respondents felt that 40 should be resumed as a matter of highest priority. Analysis of the priority activities to be resumed reveals characteristic differences: e. g., resumption of structural prevention activities was viewed more frequently as a matter of hightest priority than resumption of behavioral prevention activities. CONCLUSIONS: During the pandemic, local public health departments in BW deployed, on average, actually only half of their full staff allocated as planned to HPP-NCDs. Comparing different categories of HPP-NCDs activities (cancelled during the pandemic) in terms of the relative frequency with which their resumption is viewed as matter of highest priority, characteristic differences can be observed. It remains an open question which conclusions can be drawn from such differences.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Health Promotion , Noncommunicable Diseases , Pandemics , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/epidemiology , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Health Promotion/organization & administration , Health Promotion/statistics & numerical data , Pandemics/prevention & control , Noncommunicable Diseases/prevention & control , Noncommunicable Diseases/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Public Health , Surveys and Questionnaires , Public Health Administration/statistics & numerical data
2.
Value Health ; 25(3): 368-373, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35227447

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to showcase the potential and key concerns and risks of artificial intelligence (AI) in the health sector, illustrating its application with current examples, and to provide policy guidance for the development, assessment, and adoption of AI technologies to advance policy objectives. METHODS: Nonsystematic scan and analysis of peer-reviewed and gray literature on AI in the health sector, focusing on key insights for policy and governance. RESULTS: The application of AI in the health sector is currently in the early stages. Most applications have not been scaled beyond the research setting. The use in real-world clinical settings is especially nascent, with more evidence in public health, biomedical research, and "back office" administration. Deploying AI in the health sector carries risks and hazards that must be managed proactively by policy makers. For AI to produce positive health and policy outcomes, 5 key areas for policy are proposed, including health data governance, operationalizing AI principles, flexible regulation, skills among health workers and patients, and strategic public investment. CONCLUSIONS: AI is not a panacea, but a tool to address specific problems. Its successful development and adoption require data governance that ensures high-quality data are available and secure; relevant actors can access technical infrastructure and resources; regulatory frameworks promote trustworthy AI products; and health workers and patients have the information and skills to use AI products and services safely, effectively, and efficiently. All of this requires considerable investment and international collaboration.


Subject(s)
Artificial Intelligence , Health Care Sector/organization & administration , Health Care Sector/statistics & numerical data , Health Policy , Health Services Administration/statistics & numerical data , Biomedical Research/organization & administration , Critical Pathways , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Efficiency, Organizational , Health Care Sector/economics , Health Care Sector/standards , Health Equity , Humans , Public Health Administration/standards , Public Health Administration/statistics & numerical data , Safety Management
3.
Workplace Health Saf ; 69(9): 400-409, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33882733

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Leading Change is one of five Executive Core Qualifications (ECQs) used in developing leaders in the federal government. Leadership development programs that incorporate multirater feedback and executive coaching are valuable in developing competencies to lead change. METHODS: We examined the extent by which coaching influenced Leading Change competencies and identified effective tools and resources used to enhance the leadership capacity of first- and midlevel leaders at Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, Sexually Transmitted Diseases, and Tuberculosis Prevention. Data included qualitative data collected via semi-structured interviews that focused on leadership changes made by leaders in the Coaching and Leadership Initiative (CaLI), a leadership development program for Team Leads and Branch Chiefs. FINDINGS: Ninety-six participants completed leadership coaching; 94 (98%) of whom completed one or more interviews. Of those 94 respondents, 74 (79%) reported improvements in their ability to lead change in 3 of 4 leading change competencies: creativity and innovation, flexibility, and resilience. All respondents indicated tools and resources that were effective in leading change: 49 (52%) participated in instructor-led activities during their CaLI experience; 33 (35%) experiential activities; 94 (100%) developmental relationships, assessment, and feedback; and 25 (27%) self-development. CONCLUSIONS/APPLICATION TO PRACTICE: First- and midlevel leaders in a public health agency benefitted from using leadership coaching in developing competencies to lead organizational change. Leadership development programs might benefit from examining Leading Change competencies and including instructor-led and experiential activities as an additional component of a comprehensive leadership development program.


Subject(s)
Feedback , Leadership , Organizational Innovation , Public Health Administration/standards , Humans , Mentoring/methods , Mentoring/standards , Mentoring/statistics & numerical data , Public Health Administration/methods , Public Health Administration/statistics & numerical data
6.
Milbank Q ; 99(3): 794-827, 2021 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33650741

ABSTRACT

Policy Points Mayoral officials' opinions about the existence and fairness of health disparities in their city are positively associated with the magnitude of income-based life expectancy disparity in their city. Associations between mayoral officials' opinions about health disparities in their city and the magnitude of life expectancy disparity in their city are not moderated by the social or fiscal ideology of mayoral officials or the ideology of their constituents. Highly visible and publicized information about mortality disparities, such as that related to COVID-19 disparities, has potential to elevate elected officials' perceptions of the severity of health disparities and influence their opinions about the issue. CONTEXT: A substantive body of research has explored what factors influence elected officials' opinions about health issues. However, no studies have assessed the potential influence of the health of an elected official's constituents. We assessed whether the magnitude of income-based life expectancy disparity within a city was associated with the opinions of that city's mayoral official (i.e., mayor or deputy mayor) about health disparities in their city. METHODS: The independent variable was the magnitude of income-based life expectancy disparity in US cities. The magnitude was determined by linking 2010-2015 estimates of life expectancy and median household income for 8,434 census tracts in 224 cities. The dependent variables were mayoral officials' opinions from a 2016 survey about the existence and fairness of health disparities in their city (n = 224, response rate 30.3%). Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for characteristics of mayoral officials (e.g., ideology) and city characteristics. FINDINGS: In cities in the highest income-based life expectancy disparity quartile, 50.0% of mayoral officials "strongly agreed" that health disparities existed and 52.7% believed health disparities were "very unfair." In comparison, among mayoral officials in cities in the lowest disparity quartile 33.9% "strongly agreed" that health disparities existed and 22.2% believed the disparities were "very unfair." A 1-year-larger income-based life expectancy disparity in a city was associated with 25% higher odds that the city's mayoral official would "strongly agree" that health disparities existed (odds ratio [OR] = 1.25; P = .04) and twice the odds that the city's mayoral official would believe that such disparities were "very unfair" (OR = 2.24; P <.001). CONCLUSIONS: Mayoral officials' opinions about health disparities in their jurisdictions are generally aligned with, and potentially influenced by, information about the magnitude of income-based life expectancy disparities among their constituents.


Subject(s)
Health Status Disparities , Local Government , Public Health Administration/statistics & numerical data , Urban Health/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Attitude to Health , Cities , Health Status , Humans , Life Expectancy , Male , United States
7.
J Public Health Manag Pract ; 27(3): 240-245, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33570870

ABSTRACT

A mixed-methods approach was taken to describe lessons learned by local health department leaders during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic in New York State and to document leaders' assessments of their departments' emergency preparedness capabilities and capacities. Leaders participating in a survey rated the effectiveness of their department's capabilities and capacities in administrative and public health preparedness, epidemiology, and communications on a scale from 1 to 5; those partaking in focus groups answered open-ended questions about the same 4 topics. Subjects rated intragovernmental activities most effective ( = 4.41, SD = 0.83) and reported receiving assistance from other county agencies. They rated level of supplies least effective ( = 3.03, SD = 1.01), describing low supply levels and inequitable distribution of testing materials and personal protective equipment among regions. Local health departments in New York require more state and federal aid to maintain the public health workforce in preparation for future emergencies.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Civil Defense/organization & administration , Civil Defense/statistics & numerical data , Disaster Planning/organization & administration , Disaster Planning/statistics & numerical data , Pandemics/prevention & control , Public Health Administration/statistics & numerical data , COVID-19/epidemiology , Humans , New York/epidemiology , Pandemics/statistics & numerical data , SARS-CoV-2
8.
J Med Internet Res ; 23(2): e21463, 2021 02 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33481756

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, growth in citizen engagement with social media platforms has enabled public health departments to accelerate and improve health information dissemination, developing transparency and trust between governments and citizens. In light of these benefits, it is imperative to learn the antecedents and underlying mechanisms for this to maintain and enhance engagement. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to determine the factors and influencing mechanisms related to citizen engagement with the TikTok account of the National Health Commission of China during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Using a web crawler, 355 short videos were collected from the Healthy China account on TikTok (with more than 3 million followers throughout China), covering the period from January 21, 2020, to April 25, 2020. The title and video length, as well as the number of likes, shares, and comments were collected for each video. After classifying them using content analysis, a series of negative binomial regression analyses were completed. RESULTS: Among the 355 videos, 154 (43.4%) related to guidance for clinicians, patients, and ordinary citizens, followed by information concerning the government's handling of the pandemic (n=100, 28.2%), the latest news about COVID-19 (n=61, 17.2%), and appreciation toward frontline emergency services (n=40, 11.3%). Video length, titles, dialogic loop, and content type all influenced the level of citizen engagement. Specifically, video length was negatively associated with the number of likes (incidence rate ratio [IRR]=0.19, P<.001) and comments (IRR=0.39, P<.001). Title length was positively related to the number of shares (IRR=24.25, P=.01), likes (IRR=8.50, P=.03), and comments (IRR=7.85, P=.02). Dialogic loop negatively predicted the number of shares (IRR=0.56, P=.03). In comparison to appreciative information, information about the government's handling of the situation (IRR=5.16, P<.001) and guidelines information (IRR=7.31, P<.001) were positively correlated with the number of shares, while the latest news was negatively related to the number of likes received (IRR=0.46, P=.004). More importantly, the relationship between predictors and citizen engagement was moderated by the emotional valence of video titles. Longer videos with positive titles received a higher number of likes (IRR=21.72, P=.04) and comments (IRR=10.14, P=.047). Furthermore, for short videos related to government handling of the pandemic (IRR=14.48, P=.04) and guidance for stakeholders (IRR=7.59, P=.04), positive titles received a greater number of shares. Videos related to the latest news (IRR=66.69, P=.04) received more likes if the video title displayed higher levels of positive emotion. CONCLUSIONS: During the COVID-19 pandemic, videos were frequently published on government social media platforms. Video length, title, dialogic loop, and content type significantly influenced the level of citizen engagement. These relationships were moderated by the emotional valence of the video's title. Our findings have implications for maintaining and enhancing citizen engagement via government social media.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Emotions , Federal Government , Information Dissemination , Pandemics , Public Health Administration/statistics & numerical data , Social Media/statistics & numerical data , COVID-19/epidemiology , China/epidemiology , Health Education , Humans , Video Recording
9.
J Public Health Manag Pract ; 27(3): 299-304, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32487927

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess associations between state public health agency governance and timing and extent of implementation of social distancing control measures during COVID-19 response. DESIGN: State public health agencies were stratified by governance, and data on timing and extent of social distancing were collected from the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. Multinomial logistic regression and time-to-event analyses were conducted to quantify impacts of governance structure on timing and extent of social distancing. SETTING: State health departments in the United States. RESULTS: States operating under centralized public health governance structures enacted social distancing 4 days after decentralized states and had a 73% reduced likelihood of enacting a social distancing policy (hazard ratio = 0.27; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.86). CONCLUSION: State health department governance structure may have implications on timing and extent of social distancing control measures implemented during a public health emergency.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Government Agencies/standards , Physical Distancing , Public Health Administration/statistics & numerical data , Public Health Administration/standards , Quarantine/standards , State Government , COVID-19/epidemiology , Government Agencies/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Quarantine/statistics & numerical data , SARS-CoV-2 , United States/epidemiology
10.
Am J Public Health ; 111(2): 301-308, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33351657

ABSTRACT

Objectives. To examine correlates of applying for accreditation among small local health departments (LHDs) in the United States through 2019.Methods. We used administrative data from the Public Health Accreditation Board (PHAB) and 2013, 2016, and 2019 Profile data from the National Association of County and City Health Officials to examine correlates of applying for PHAB accreditation. We fit a latent class analysis (LCA) to characterize LHDs by service mix and size. We made bivariate comparisons using the t test and Pearson χ2.Results. By the end of 2019, 126 small LHDs had applied for accreditation (8%). When we compared reasons for not pursuing accreditation, we observed a difference by size for perceptions that standards exceeded LHD capacity (47% for small vs 22% for midsized [P < .001] and 0% for large [P < .001]).Conclusions. Greater funding support, considering differing standards by LHD size, and recognition that service mix might affect practicality of accreditation are all relevant considerations in attempting to increase uptake of accreditation for small LHDs.Public Health Implications. Overall, small LHDs represented about 60% of all LHDs that had not yet applied to PHAB.


Subject(s)
Accreditation/statistics & numerical data , Community Health Centers/statistics & numerical data , Local Government , Public Health Administration/statistics & numerical data , Community Health Centers/standards , Humans , United States
11.
Am J Public Health ; 110(9): 1283-1290, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32673103

ABSTRACT

Public health in the rural United States is a complex and underfunded enterprise. While urban-rural disparities have been a focus for researchers and policymakers alike for decades, inequalities continue to grow. Life expectancy at birth is now 1 to 2 years greater between wealthier urban and rural counties, and is as much as 5 years, on average, between wealthy and poor counties.This article explores the growth in these disparities over the past 40 years, with roots in structural, economic, and social spending differentials that have emerged or persisted over the same time period. Importantly, a focus on place-based disparities recognizes that the rural United States is not a monolith, with important geographic and cultural differences present regionally. We also focus on the challenges the rural governmental public health enterprise faces, the so-called "double disparity" of worse health outcomes and behaviors alongside modest investment in health departments compared with their nonrural peers.Finally, we offer 5 population-based "prescriptions" for supporting rural public health in the United States. These relate to greater investment and supporting rural advocacy to better address the needs of the rural United States in this new decade.


Subject(s)
Public Health Administration/economics , Rural Health/trends , Rural Population/statistics & numerical data , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections , Health Services Accessibility , Health Status Disparities , Humans , Mortality, Premature/trends , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral , Public Health Administration/statistics & numerical data , Rural Health Services/economics , United States
12.
Am J Public Health ; 110(9): 1293-1299, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32673110

ABSTRACT

Objectives. To investigate differences in funding and service delivery between rural and urban local health departments (LHDs) in the United States.Methods. In this repeated cross-sectional study, we examined rural-urban differences in funding and service provision among LHDs over time using 2010 and 2016 National Association of County and City Health Officials data.Results. Local revenue among urban LHDs (41.2%) was higher than that in large rural (31.3%) and small rural LHDs (31.2%; P < .05). Small (20.9%) and large rural LHDs (19.8%) reported greater reliance on revenue from Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services than urban LHDs (11.5%; P < .05). All experienced decreases in clinical revenue between 2010 and 2016. Urban LHDs provided less primary care services in 2016; rural LHDs provided more mental health and substance abuse services (P < .05).Conclusions. Urban LHDs generated more revenues from local sources, and rural LHDs generated more from the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services and clinical services. Rural LHDs tended to provide more clinical services. Given rural LHDs' reliance on clinical revenue, decreases in clinical services could have disproportionate effects on them.Public Health Implications. Differences in financing and service delivery by rurality have an impact on the communities. Rural LHDs rely more heavily on state and federal dollars, which are vulnerable to changes in state and national health policy.


Subject(s)
Public Health Administration/economics , Rural Health Services/economics , Urban Health Services/economics , Cross-Sectional Studies , Delivery of Health Care , Humans , Local Government , Medicaid , Medicare , Public Health Administration/statistics & numerical data , Rural Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Rural Population , United States , Urban Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Urban Population
14.
Am J Public Health ; 110(S2): S204-S210, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32663081

ABSTRACT

Objectives. To examine changes in the scope of activity and organizational composition of public health delivery systems serving rural and urban US communities between 2014 and 2018.Methods. We used data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Public Health Systems to measure the implementation of recommended public health activities and the network of organizations contributing to these activities in a nationally representative cohort of US communities. We used multivariable regression models to test for rural-urban differences between 2014 and 2018.Results. The scope of recommended activities implemented in rural areas declined by 3.4 percentage points between 2014 and 2018, whereas it increased by 1.4 percentage points in urban areas. The rural-urban disparity in scope of activities grew by a total of 4.8 percentage points (P < .05) over this time. The disparity in network density grew by 2.3 percentage points (P < .05).Conclusions. Urban public health systems have enhanced their scope of activities and organizational networks since 2014, whereas rural systems have lost capacity. These trends suggest that system improvement initiatives have had uneven success, and they may contribute to growing rural-urban disparities in population health status.


Subject(s)
Public Health/statistics & numerical data , Rural Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Urban Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Public Health Administration/statistics & numerical data , Rural Health Services/organization & administration , United States , Urban Health Services/organization & administration
15.
Am J Public Health ; 110(S2): S232-S234, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32663092

ABSTRACT

Objectives. To examine the extent to which social service organizations participate in the organizational networks that implement public health activities in US communities, consistent with recent national recommendations.Methods. Using data from a national sample of US communities, we measured the breadth and depth of engagement in public health activities among specific types of social and community service organizations.Results. Engagement was most prevalent (breadth) among organizations providing housing and food assistance, with engagement present in more than 70% of communities. Engagement was least prevalent among economic development, environmental protection, and law and justice organizations (less than 33% of communities). Depth of engagement was shallow and focused on a narrow range of public health activities.Conclusions. Cross-sector relationships between public health and the housing and food sectors are now widespread across the United States, giving most communities viable avenues for addressing selected social determinants of health. Relationships with many other social and community service organizations are more limited.Public Health Implications. Public health leaders should prioritize opportunities for engagement with low-connectivity social sectors in their communities such as law, justice, and economic development.


Subject(s)
Intersectoral Collaboration , Public Health Administration/statistics & numerical data , Social Work/statistics & numerical data , Cooperative Behavior , Humans , Public Health , Social Welfare/statistics & numerical data , United States
17.
Hum Resour Health ; 18(1): 21, 2020 03 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32183819

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Around the world, there is a significant difference in the proportion of women with access to leadership in healthcare with respect to men. This article studies gender imbalance and wage gap in managerial, executive, and directive job positions at the Mexican National Institutes of Health. METHODS: Cohort data were described using a visual circular representation and modeled using a generalized linear model. Analysis of variance was used to assess model significance, and posterior Fisher's least significant differences were analyzed when appropriate. RESULTS: This study demonstrated that there is a gender imbalance distribution among the hierarchical position at the Mexican National Health Institutes and also exposed that the wage gap exists mainly in the (highest or lowest) ranks in hierarchical order. CONCLUSIONS: Since the majority of the healthcare workforce is female, Mexican women are still underrepresented in executive and directive management positions at national healthcare organizations.


Subject(s)
Administrative Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Leadership , Public Health Administration/statistics & numerical data , Career Mobility , Humans , Mexico , Salaries and Fringe Benefits/statistics & numerical data , Sex Distribution
18.
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique ; 68(2): 125-132, 2020 Apr.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32035728

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: French Guiana faces singular health challenges: poverty, isolation, structural lag, difficulties in attracting health professionals. Hospital stays exceed the recommended durations. The present study aimed to model the impact of precariousness and geographic isolation on the hospital duration performance indicator and to recalculate the indicator after incrementing severity by 1 unit when patients were socially precarious. METHODS: Cayenne hospital data for 2017 were used to model the hospital duration performance indicator (IP-DMS) using quantile regression to study the impact of geographic and social explanatory variables. This indicator was computed hypothesizing a 1 unit increment of severity for precarious patients and by excluding patients from isolated regions. RESULTS: Most excess hospitalization days were linked to precariousness: the sojourns of precarious patients represented 47% of activity but generated 71% of excess days in hospital. Quantile regression models showed that after adjustment for potential confounders, patients from western French Guiana and Eastern French Guiana, precarious patients and the interactions terms between residence location and precariousness were significantly associated with IP-DMS increases. Recalculating the IP-DMSafter exclusion of patients from the interior and after increasing severity by 1 notch if the patient was precarious led to IP-DMS levels close to 1. CONCLUSION: The results show the nonlinear relationship between the IP-DMS and geographical isolation, poverty, and their interaction. These contextual variables must be taken into account when choosing the target IP-DMS value for French Guiana, which conditions funding and number of hospital beds allowed in a context of rapid demographic growth.


Subject(s)
Critical Pathways , Health Services Accessibility , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Poverty/statistics & numerical data , Social Isolation , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , Critical Pathways/organization & administration , Critical Pathways/standards , Critical Pathways/statistics & numerical data , Female , French Guiana/epidemiology , Health Services Accessibility/organization & administration , Health Services Accessibility/standards , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Medical Staff/organization & administration , Medical Staff/standards , Medical Staff/statistics & numerical data , Medical Staff/supply & distribution , Middle Aged , Public Health Administration/standards , Public Health Administration/statistics & numerical data , Referral and Consultation/organization & administration , Referral and Consultation/standards , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data , Time-to-Treatment/organization & administration , Time-to-Treatment/standards , Time-to-Treatment/statistics & numerical data , Vulnerable Populations/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
19.
Obes Surg ; 30(3): 961-968, 2020 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31705416

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery is proven to be the most effective strategy for management of obesity and its related comorbidities. However, in Canada, patients awaiting bariatric surgery can be subjected to prolonged wait times, thereby subjecting them to increased morbidity and mortality, as well as decreased psychosocial well-being. OBJECTIVE: To assess the factors associated with prolonged wait times for bariatric surgery within a publicly funded, provincial bariatric network. METHODS: This was a retrospective population-based study of all patients aged > 18 years who were referred for bariatric surgery from April 2009 to May 2015 using linked administrative databases to capture patient demographic data, socioeconomic variables, healthcare utilization, and institutional factors. The main outcome of interest was a wait time greater than 18 months. Multivariate logistic regression modeling was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: A total of 18,854 patients underwent bariatric surgery from April 2009 to December 2016, of which 2407 patients experienced wait times of > 18 months. On average, yearly wait times have increased for patients receiving surgery with wait times of 10.98 months (SD 5.48) in 2010 and 13.09 (SD 6.69) in 2016 (p < 0.001). Increasing age (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.05-1.19, p = 0.0004), BMI (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.04-1.11, p < 0.001), and male gender (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.28-1.70, p < 0.001) were significantly associated with increased bariatric surgery wait times. Additionally, smoking status (OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.09-1.97, p = 0.0118) and obesity-related comorbidities particularly diabetes (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.14-1.44, p < 0.001) and heart failure (OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.43-2.07, p < 0.001) were correlated with prolonged wait times for surgery. Socioeconomic variables including disability (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.38-1.92, p < 0.001) and immigration status (OR 1.35, 95% 1.11-1.64, p = 0.003) were correlated with increased odds of longer wait times, as were regions with regionalized assessment and treatment centres (RATC) when referenced against centers of excellence (COEs) in number of days added with 20.45 (95% CI 13.20-27.70, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Wait times for bariatric surgery in a publicly funded, regionalized bariatric program are influenced by certain patient characteristics, socioeconomic variables, and institutional factors. This warrants further intervention and study to help improve these inequities when encountering potentially vulnerable populations awaiting bariatric surgery.


Subject(s)
Bariatric Surgery , Health Services Accessibility , Obesity, Morbid/epidemiology , Obesity, Morbid/surgery , Waiting Lists , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Bariatric Surgery/statistics & numerical data , Canada/epidemiology , Comorbidity , Female , Health Services Accessibility/organization & administration , Health Services Accessibility/standards , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Obesity, Morbid/psychology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Public Health Administration/methods , Public Health Administration/standards , Public Health Administration/statistics & numerical data , Referral and Consultation/organization & administration , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data , Regional Health Planning/organization & administration , Regional Health Planning/standards , Regional Health Planning/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Time-to-Treatment/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
20.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol ; 129: 109784, 2020 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31760333

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe the association, or non-association, of public health district staffing (specifically, Early Hearing Detection and Intervention [EHDI] coordinator/navigator) and loss to follow-up in newborns who did not pass hearing screening in selected public health districts in Georgia, USA. METHODS: By Freedom of Information request, data regarding newborn hearing screening and loss to follow-up for diagnostic testing and staffing were acquired for three districts in Georgia for six years. The districts were chosen because their coordinator/navigator positions were unfilled at times. RESULTS: Lapses in staffing of the district EHDI coordinator/navigator position aligned temporally with decreased follow-up. Aggregate three district data showed that follow-up rates in quarter-years with a fulltime navigator were higher than quarter-years without a full-time navigator (p < .001). CONCLUSION: Lapses in staffing dedicated to EHDI navigation-coordination correlated with poorer follow-up after not passing newborn hearing screening.


Subject(s)
Lost to Follow-Up , Neonatal Screening , Public Health Administration/statistics & numerical data , Workforce , Georgia , Hearing Tests , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL