Acute Eosinophilic Pneumonia Induced by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor and Anti-TIGIT Therapy.

BACKGROUND Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been linked to various immune-related adverse events, including pneumonitis, necessitating early recognition and potential treatment discontinuation. Acute eosinophilic pneumonia (AEP) induced by ICIs, particularly with no reported cases involving anti-TIGIT therapy, is rare. This report describes a case of AEP following treatment with pembrolizumab and anti-TIGIT therapy. CASE REPORT A 46-year-old woman with lung adenoid cystic carcinoma and chronic hypoxemic respiratory failure on long-term oxygen therapy presented with fever, cough, and shortness of breath. She underwent left pneumonectomy and radiation therapy at diagnosis 9 years earlier. She was participating in a clinical trial using pembrolizumab and anti-TIGIT EOS-448, due to cancer progression. After starting therapy, she developed stable peripheral eosinophilia and a skin rash, suggestive of a drug reaction. On admission, she was in acute-on-chronic hypoxemic respiratory failure, febrile, with an elevated eosinophil count and new multifocal infiltrates in the right lung. Despite broad antibiotics coverage for pneumonia, she developed worsening respiratory symptoms and eosinophilia. She was then empirically started on intravenous methylprednisolone for acute eosinophilic pneumonia without confirmatory bronchoscopy as she was at high risk with her previous pneumonectomy. She subsequently had rapid improvement in her symptoms. CONCLUSIONS AEP should be considered in patients treated with ICIs who develop immune-related adverse effects. Although bronchoscopy findings are part of AEP's diagnostic criteria, this case underscores the importance of clinical judgment in the prompt initiation of steroids, even without confirmatory bronchoscopy, in rapidly progressing cases. The role of anti-TIGIT therapy in this context remains uncertain.

A case of naltrexone-induced acute eosinophilic pneumonia.

Acute eosinophilic pneumonia (AEP) is a rare cause of acute respiratory failure. Clinical presentations can range from dyspnoea, fever and cough, to rapidly progressive and potentially fulminant respiratory failure. While its exact cause is often unknown, associations with inhalational injuries and exposures to new medications have been described.We report a case of a middle-aged, non-smoking man with a history of alcohol use disorder. He presented with 4 days of shortness of breath that started hours after taking injectable naltrexone (Vivitrol). The patient had rapidly worsening hypoxaemia, necessitating emergent bronchoscopy with transbronchial biopsies and bronchoalveolar lavage which showed 66% eosinophils. The patient was intubated for the procedure and unable to get extubated due to worsening hypoxaemic respiratory failure with high fractional inspired oxygen requirements. Chest radiograph showed worsening lung infiltrates and with a high index of suspicion for AEP, he was started empirically on methylprednisolone. He had rapid improvement in his respiratory status and was extubated on day 5 of admission then discharged on day 8. Histopathological examination confirmed acute/subacute eosinophilic pneumonia. A 3-week post-discharge follow-up chest radiograph confirmed the full resolution of pulmonary infiltrates.Naltrexone-induced AEP is rare, with only six other cases reported in the literature. Careful history taking and prompt evaluation for AEP are important given the potential for rapid progression to acute hypoxic respiratory failure and the excellent response to steroid treatment.

Daptomycin-induced eosinophilic pneumonia.

ABSTRACT: Daptomycin-induced eosinophilic pneumonia (DIEP) is a rare complication of daptomycin use. Manifestations most commonly include fever, hypoxia, dyspnea, cough, eosinophilia, and lung changes on radiographs and CT. Patients typically have had recent daptomycin exposure and develop fever, dyspnea, infiltrates on chest radiograph, more than 25% eosinophils on bronchoalveolar lavage, and improvement of symptoms after withdrawal of daptomycin. Treatment includes discontinuation of daptomycin, corticosteroids, and supportive measures such as supplemental oxygen. Clinicians should have a high index of suspicion for DIEP in patients who develop new onset of pulmonary and systemic signs and symptoms after initiation of daptomycin.

Cryptogenic organizing pneumonia after withdrawal of systemic corticosteroids for chronic eosinophilic pneumonia and severe asthma under benralizumab treatment.

A 79-year-old woman with severe asthma developed chronic eosinophilic pneumonia (CEP). After CEP resolved with oral prednisolone at 30 mg/day, prednisolone was tapered and discontinued under introduction of benralizumab for her severe asthma. However, 8 weeks later, symptoms and bilateral patchy infiltrates on chest radiography appeared. Lymphocytosis without eosinophilia was seen in bronchoalveolar lavage fluids, and transbronchial biopsy indicated organizing pneumonia. Cryptogenic organizing pneumonia (COP) was diagnosed and resolved with prednisolone at 30 mg/day. Prednisolone was tapered to 3 mg/day without relapse of CEP or COP. This case suggests the overlap and similar pathogenesis of CEP and COP.

Reduction of daily maintenance inhaled corticosteroids in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma treated with benralizumab (SHAMAL): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 4 study.

BACKGROUND: Stepwise intensification of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) is routine for severe eosinophilic asthma, despite some poor responses to high-dose ICS. Dose reductions are recommended in patients responding to biologics, but little supporting safety evidence exists. METHODS: SHAMAL was a phase 4, randomised, open-label, active-controlled study done at 22 study sites in four countries. Eligible participants were adults (aged ≥18 years) with severe eosinophilic asthma and a five-item Asthma Control Questionnaire score below 1·5 and who received at least three consecutive doses of benralizumab before screening. We randomly assigned patients (3:1) to taper their high-dose ICS to a medium-dose, low-dose, and as-needed dose (reduction group) or continue (reference group) their ICS-formoterol therapy for 32 weeks, followed by a 16-week maintenance period. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients reducing their ICS-formoterol dose by week 32. The primary outcome was assessed in the reduction group, and safety analyses included all randomly assigned patients receiving study treatment. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04159519. FINDINGS: Between Nov 12, 2019, and Feb 16, 2023, we screened and enrolled in the run-in period 208 patients. We randomly assigned 168 (81%) to the reduction (n=125 [74%]) and reference arms (n=43 [26%]). Overall, 110 (92%) patients reduced their ICS-formoterol dose: 18 (15%) to medium-dose, 20 (17%) to low-dose, and 72 (61%) to as-needed only. In 113 (96%) patients, reductions were maintained to week 48; 114 (91%) of patients in the reduction group had zero exacerbations during tapering. Rates of adverse events were similar between groups. 91 (73%) patients had adverse events in the reduction group and 35 (83%) in the reference group. 17 patients had serious adverse events in the study: 12 (10%) in the reduction group and five (12%) in the reference group. No deaths occurred during the study. INTERPRETATION: These findings show that patients controlled on benralizumab can have meaningful reductions in ICS therapy while maintaining asthma control. FUNDING: AstraZeneca.

Vaping Associated Acute Eosinophilic Pneumonia: A Clinical and Radiologic Mimicker of COVID-19.

Acute eosinophilic pneumonia (AEP) is a rare cause of respiratory failure. It is primarily a disease of smokers, either a new smoker or an existing one with a recent increase in cigarette consumption. Other risk factors include toxic gas exposure, inhalational illicit drugs, and smoking marijuana. AEP has also been reported in patients with e-cigarette or vaping associated lung injury (EVALI). We present the case of a 20-year-old male who presented to the hospital with acute respiratory failure. The patient has been vaping heavily for the past three months and started smoking three days before presenting to the emergency department. He was hypertensive, tachycardic, tachypneic, and required high-flow nasal cannula to maintain SpO2 > 92%. His condition deteriorated in the first 24 hours following hospitalization requiring noninvasive positive pressure ventilation. Bronchoalveolar lavage revealed an eosinophil count of 36%. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) cytology revealed lipid-laden macrophages. He was diagnosed with AEP due to EVALI, and the patient was treated with high dose corticosteroid with subsequent improvement. Before the bronchoscopic evaluation, the clinical and radiologic findings were consistent with COVID-19, and the patient was tested twice for SARS-CoV-2 PCR. In the appropriate clinical setting, AEP should be considered in the differential diagnoses of community-acquired pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and COVID-19, especially in this pandemic era.

Daptomycin Exposure as a Risk Factor for Daptomycin-Induced Eosinophilic Pneumonia and Muscular Toxicity.

BACKGROUND: High-dose daptomycin is increasingly used in patients with bone and joint infection (BJI). This raises concerns about a higher risk of adverse events (AEs), including daptomycin-induced eosinophilic pneumonia (DIEP) and myotoxicity. We aimed to examine pharmacokinetic and other potential determinants of DIEP and myotoxicity in patients with BJI receiving daptomycin. METHODS: All patients receiving daptomycin for BJI were identified in a prospective cohort study. Cases were matched at a 1:3 ratio, with controls randomly selected from the same cohort. Bayesian estimation of the daptomycin daily area under the concentration-time curve over 24 hours (AUC24h) was performed with the Monolix software based on therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) data. Demographic and biological data were also collected. Risk factors of AEs were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: From 1130 patients followed over 7 years, 9 with DIEP, 26 with myotoxicity, and 106 controls were included in the final analysis. Daptomycin AUC24h, C-reactive protein, and serum protein levels were associated with the risk of AEs. The adjusted hazard ratio of DIEP or myotoxicity was 3.1 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.48-6.5; P < .001) for daptomycin AUC24h > 939 mg/h/L, 9.8 (95% CI, 3.94-24.5; P < .001) for C-reactive protein > 21.6 mg/L, and 2.4 (95% CI, 1.02-5.65; P = .04) for serum protein <72 g/L. CONCLUSIONS: We identified common determinants of DIEP and myotoxicity in patients with BJI. Because the risk of AEs was associated with daptomycin exposure, daptomycin TDM and model-informed precision dosing may help optimize the efficacy and safety of daptomycin treatment in this setting. A target AUC24h range of 666 to 939 mg/h/L is suggested.

[Effectiveness of mepolizumab in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma: In a real life study]. / Agir eozinofilik astimli hastalarda mepolizumab etkinligi: Bir gerçek yasam çalismasi.

Introduction: We analyzed the effects of mepolizumab treatment on symptoms, asthma attacks, pulmonary function test parameters peripheral blood eosinophil level, and percentage in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma receiving mepolizumab treatment as the baseline, sixth and twelfthmonth data. Materials and Methods: The medical records of patients diagnosed with severe eosinophilic asthma and treated with mepolizumab at our clinic were retrospectively reviewed for the period between January 2018 and December 2021. Demographic data of the patients, duration of asthma disease, comorbidities such as a nasal polyp, eosinophilic granulomatous polyangiitis, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug exacerbated respiratory disease were investigated. A comparison was made of various factors before initiating mepolizumab treatment, as well as at the sixth and twelfth month after treatment initiation. These factors include asthma control test scores, frequency of asthma attacks (including emergency admissions, hospitalizations, and intensive care admissions), peripheral blood eosinophil levels and percentages, and pulmonary function test parameters. Clinic and laboratory parameters that provide a prediction of being a responder and super responder were evaluated. Result: A total of 21 patients were included in the study. Their mean age was 50.7 ± 11.9 years, and four (19%) were males. The mean duration of asthma diagnosis was 17.5 ±13.7 years. 14 patients (66.7%) were atopic. 4 patients (19%) had nasal polyps and four patients (19%) had NERD. Before mepolizumab, 13 (61.9%) patients had received omalizumab. The duration of receiving mepolizumab treatment was 29.2 ± 9.9 months. A statistically significant decrease was observed in both the number and percentage of eosinophils at months six and 12 (p<0.01). There was a statistically significant increase in FEV1 values both as a percentage and in milliliters at month 12. There was an increase in both percentage and milliliters in FEF25-75 values, but this increase did not reach statistical significance. There was a decrease in service admissions, intensive care admissions, and emergency admissions due to asthma exacerbations. Out of 21 patients, 11 (52.4%) were classified as responders, while 10 (47.6%) were classified as super responders. Conclusions: Although the number of patients in our study was limited, mepolizumab improved symptom scores in severe eosinophilic asthma, reduced the number of attacks, and improved pulmonary function test values.

Acute eosinophilic pneumonia-like syndrome post-initiation of vortioxetine.

A man in his mid-30s presented to the emergency department with a 1-week history of fatigue, loss of appetite, fever and productive (yellow) cough. This progressed to requiring admission to intensive care needing a oxygen therapy via high-flow nasal cannula for acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure. He had recently started vortioxetine for major depressive disorder, and his acute symptoms correlated with an increase in the dose of vortioxetine. For more than 20 years, rare but consistent reports of serotonergic medications have been implicated in eosinophilic pulmonary conditions. During this same period, serotonergic medications have become a mainstay solution for a wide range of depressive symptoms and disorders. This is the first report of an eosinophilic pneumonia-like syndrome occurring while consuming the novel serotonergic medication vortioxetine.

Comparison of omalizumab and mepolizumab treatment efficacy in patients with atopic and eosinophilic "Overlap" severe asthma: Biological agent preference in atopic-eosinophilic severe asthma.

Approximately 1-third of patients with severe asthma are candidates for both omalizumab and mepolizumab treatment. We aimed to compare the clinical, spirometric and inflammatory efficacy of these 2 biologics in atopic and eosinophilic "overlap" severe asthma patients. In our 3-center retrospective cross-sectional observational study, the data of patients who received omalizumab or mepolizumab for at least 16 weeks to treat severe asthma were examined. Atopic (perennial allergen sensitivity and total IgE level 30-1500 IU/mL) and eosinophilic (blood eosinophil counts ≥150 cells/µL in admission; or ≥300 cells/µL in the previous year) patients with asthma suitable for both biologics were included in the study. Post-treatment changes in the asthma control test (ACT) score, number of attacks, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), and eosinophil count were compared. The rates of any biological responder patient were compared according to whether they had high eosinophil counts (≥500 cells/µL vs <500 cells/µL). Total of 181 patients data were evaluated, of the 74 atopic and eosinophilic overlap patients included in the study, 56 were receiving omalizumab and 18 were receiving mepolizumab. When omalizumab and mepolizumab treatment efficacies were compared, there was no difference in terms of the reduction in attacks and improvement in ACT. The decrease in eosinophil levels in patients in the mepolizumab arm was significantly higher than that in patients in the omalizumab arm (46.3% vs 87.8%; P < .001). The improvement in FEV1 was greater with mepolizumab treatment, although the difference was not significant (215 mL vs 380 mL; P = .053). It has been shown that having high eosinophil counts does not affect the clinical and spirometric responder patient rates for either biological condition. The success of omalizumab and mepolizumab treatment is similar in patients with atopic and eosinophilic overlap with severe asthma. However, because the baseline patient inclusion criteria are not compatible, head-to-head studies comparing both biological agents are required.

Clinical characteristics, management, and outcome of eosinophilic pneumonia associated with daptomycin

Objective: The association between daptomycin exposure and eosinophilic pneumonia (EP) is mainly based on case reports. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics and provide more evidence for better identify and management of daptomycin-induced eosinophilic pneumonia in clinical practice.MethodsLiterature from 1991 to October 31, 2021 on EP induced by daptomycin were collected for retrospective analysis.ResultsA total of 47 patients (40 male and 7 female) from 35 studies were included. The median age was 67 years (range 28–89), and 78.7% of patients were ≥60 years. Daptomycin was mainly used in patients undergoing osteoarticular infections (63.8%). Typical initial symptoms were fever (91.5%), cough (55.3%) and dyspnea (59.6%). The median onset time of symptom was 3 weeks. EP recurred in 14.9% of patients after the re-administration of daptomycin, and 57.1% of EP recurred within 24h. Most cases were accompanied by marked accumulation of eosinophils in peripheral (41 cases) and/or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (27 cases). The main radiological features were pulmonary infiltration, ground glass opacity or consolidation in CT/CXR. All patients had symptom resolution after discontinuation of daptomycin except for one patient died due to the progression of the primary disease, the median time to symptoms relief was 3 days. Corticosteroids have been shown to help symptoms relief in some cases (59.6%).ConclusionDaptomycin-induced eosinophilic pneumonia is a rare and serious complication. Physicians should consider eosinophilic pneumonia as a differential diagnosis when receiving daptomycin therapy, particularly in elderly male patients. (AU)

Objetivo: La asociación entre la exposición a daptomicina y la neumonía eosinofílica (NE) se basa principalmente en informes de casos. El propósito de este estudio fue evaluar las características clínicas y proporcionar más evidencia para una mejor identificación y tratamiento de la NE inducida por daptomicina en la práctica clínica.MétodosSe recopiló literatura médica desde 1991 hasta el 31 de octubre de 2021 sobre NE inducida por daptomicina para un análisis retrospectivo.ResultadosSe incluyeron un total de 47 pacientes (40 hombres y 7 mujeres) de 35 estudios. La mediana de edad fue de 67 años (rango 28-89), y el 78,7% de los pacientes tenían≥60 años. La daptomicina se utilizó principalmente en pacientes con infecciones osteoarticulares (63,8%). Los síntomas iniciales típicos fueron fiebre (91,5%), tos (55,3%) y disnea (59,6%). La mediana del tiempo de aparición de los síntomas fue de 3 semanas. La NE reapareció en el 14,9% de los pacientes después de la readministración de daptomicina, y el 57,1% lo hizo dentro de las primeras 24h. La mayoría de los casos se acompañó de una marcada acumulación de eosinófilos en tejidos periféricos (91,1%)/pulmonares (7 casos) y/o líquido de lavado broncoalveolar (27 casos). Las principales características radiológicas fueron infiltración pulmonar, opacidad «en vidrio deslustrado» o consolidación en TC/CXR. Todos los pacientes tuvieron una resolución de los síntomas después de la interrupción de la daptomicina, excepto uno que falleció debido a la progresión de la enfermedad primaria; la mediana de tiempo hasta el alivio de los síntomas fue de 3 días. Se ha demostrado que los corticoides ayudan al alivio de los síntomas en algunos casos (59,6%).ConclusiónLa NE inducida por daptomicina es una complicación rara y grave. Los médicos deben considerar la NE como un diagnóstico diferencial cuando un paciente recibe tratamiento con daptomicina, particularmente en varones de edad avanzada. (AU)

Hypersensitivity reactions to COVID-19 vaccines: a case of Eosinophilic pneumonia following Sinovac/CoronaVac vaccination.

Summary: Hypersensitivity reactions has been reported with COVID-19 vaccines. Acute eosinophilic pneumonia has not been reported yet after Sinovac/CoronaVac vaccine. A 73-year-old woman presented with maculopapular rash, cough and dyspnea following Sinovac/CoronaVac injection. The complete blood count (CBC) indicated eosinophilia and further evaluation of the eosinophilia with CT and bronchoscopy confirmed a diagnosis of acute eosinophilic pneumonia. After methylprednisolone therapy, her rash resolved with marked improvement of the dyspnea. She is still on treatment and on the follow up period, we plan to continue steroid treatment at least 3 months.

Clinical characteristics, management, and outcome of eosinophilic pneumonia associated with daptomycin.

OBJECTIVE: The association between daptomycin exposure and eosinophilic pneumonia (EP) is mainly based on case reports. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics and provide more evidence for better identify and management of daptomycin-induced eosinophilic pneumonia in clinical practice. METHODS: Literature from 1991 to October 31, 2021 on EP induced by daptomycin were collected for retrospective analysis. RESULTS: A total of 47 patients (40 male and 7 female) from 35 studies were included. The median age was 67 years (range 28-89), and 78.7% of patients were ≥60 years. Daptomycin was mainly used in patients undergoing osteoarticular infections (63.8%). Typical initial symptoms were fever (91.5%), cough (55.3%) and dyspnea (59.6%). The median onset time of symptom was 3 weeks. EP recurred in 14.9% of patients after the re-administration of daptomycin, and 57.1% of EP recurred within 24h. Most cases were accompanied by marked accumulation of eosinophils in peripheral (41 cases) and/or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (27 cases). The main radiological features were pulmonary infiltration, ground glass opacity or consolidation in CT/CXR. All patients had symptom resolution after discontinuation of daptomycin except for one patient died due to the progression of the primary disease, the median time to symptoms relief was 3 days. Corticosteroids have been shown to help symptoms relief in some cases (59.6%). CONCLUSION: Daptomycin-induced eosinophilic pneumonia is a rare and serious complication. Physicians should consider eosinophilic pneumonia as a differential diagnosis when receiving daptomycin therapy, particularly in elderly male patients.

Dupilumab and the potential risk of eosinophilic pneumonia: case report, literature review, and FAERS database analysis.

Eosinophilic pneumonia (EP) is a rare but noteworthy adverse effect linked to dupilumab, an interleukin-4 (IL-4) and IL-13 inhibitor used in the managing atopic diseases. The underlying mechanisms, potential predisposing factors, clinical characteristics, and optimal management strategies for dupilumab-induced EP remain unclear. We report a 71-year-old patient who developed acute EP after the first 600-mg dose of dupilumab. Eosinophils (EOSs) were also transiently increased (up to 1,600 cells/µl). After the acute EP was effectively treated with glucocorticoids, dupilumab treatment was continued. Rash, itching, and immunoglobulin E levels continued to decrease in the patient, and no further pulmonary adverse events occurred. We combined this case with a literature review of nine articles and analyzed data from 93 cases reported in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database of patients developing EP after dupilumab use. Our findings imply that dupilumab may induce EP, particularly in individuals over 45 years old, those with a history of respiratory diseases, and those who have previously used inhaled or systemic steroids. Vigilance is required, especially when there is a persistent elevation in peripheral blood EOSs during treatment. Although steroid treatment can effectively manage EP, more data are needed to determine the safety of resuming dupilumab treatment after controlling pneumonia.

How Can Dupilumab Cause Eosinophilic Pneumonia?

Reports of eosinophilic pneumonia (EP) as a side effect of dupilumab administration are limited in previous studies. Herein, we report two cases in which EP developed subsequent to the administration of dupilumab for eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis (ECRS). Case 1: A 55-year-old woman presented with ECRS, eosinophilic otitis media, and bronchial asthma, and was treated with dupilumab for ECRS. Five weeks later, fever and dyspnea developed, and infiltration shadows were observed in her lungs. The peripheral blood eosinophil count (PBEC) was 3848/µL (26%), bronchoalveolar lavage fluid showed eosinophilic infiltration, and EP was subsequently diagnosed. Her condition improved following prednisolone treatment. Case 2: A 59-year-old man presented with fatigue and dyspnea after receiving dupilumab for ECRS. He had infiltrative shadows throughout his left lung field, and his PBEC was 4850/µL (26.5%). Prednisolone was initiated, and his condition improved. EP developed in both patients during the period of elevated PBEC after dupilumab administration, and dupilumab was suspected to be the causative agent in their EP. Hence, EP should be considered as a differential diagnosis when fever and dyspnea appear following dupilumab administration.

Acute eosinophilic pneumonia caused by composter vapor inhalation: A case report.

A 65-year-old woman presented to a local hospital with a 4-day history of cough, fever, and dyspnea. She had started using a composter and had been exposed to the vapor for 18 days before her first visit. She was diagnosed with acute eosinophilic pneumonia (AEP) based on her symptoms, the presence of bilateral pulmonary opacities on computed tomography, and alveolar eosinophilia confirmed by bronchoalveolar lavage. Inhalation of the composter vapor was thought to be the cause of AEP. Aspergillus fumigatus was cultured from the composter soil and the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. She fully recovered without systemic corticosteroid administration by avoiding the composter.