Safety and tolerability of esketamine nasal spray versus quetiapine extended release in patients with treatment resistant depression.

In ESCAPE-TRD (NCT04338321), esketamine nasal spray (NS) significantly increased the probability of remission at Week 8, and of being relapse-free through Week 32 after remission at Week 8, versus quetiapine extended release (XR) in patients with treatment resistant depression (TRD). Here, we explore the time course, burden and consequences of treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in the phase IIIb ESCAPE­TRD trial. Patients with TRD were randomised 1:1 to esketamine NS or quetiapine XR, dosed per label alongside an ongoing selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor/serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor. In this secondary publication, safety analyses (comprising patients who received ≥1 dose of study treatment) included incidence, severity and durations (Kaplan­Meier method) of TEAEs, and subsequent dispositional changes. P values were not adjusted for multiple testing. 336 patients were randomised to esketamine NS and 340 to quetiapine XR; 334 and 336 received ≥1 dose of study treatment, respectively. TEAEs were significantly more common with esketamine NS than quetiapine XR (91.9 % versus 78.0 %; p < 0.001), but were typically mild/moderate and transient in nature: a greater proportion resolved on the same-day (92.0 % versus 12.1 %) and lead to treatment discontinuation in significantly fewer patients (4.2 % versus 11.0 %, respectively; p < 0.001). The proportion of days spent with TEAEs was significantly lower with esketamine NS than quetiapine XR (median: 11.9 % versus 21.3 %; p < 0.001). Although more frequent with esketamine NS, TEAEs were typically transient and mild, with discontinuation less likely versus quetiapine XR. Data were consistent with established safety profiles, with no new safety signals identified. Alongside greater efficacy, the demonstrably more favourable tolerability profile of esketamine NS versus quetiapine XR further supports its use for TRD.

Stevens-Johnson syndrome-toxic epidermal necrolysis overlap in a patient taking quetiapine and famotidine: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Stevens-Johnson syndrome-toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS-TNE) overlap is a rare skin disorder characterized by erythema, blisters, extensive exfoliation, epidermal detachment, the involvement of multiple mucosae, and positive Nikolsky's sign. SJS-TEN has a high mortality rate. Our case involves a rare occurrence of drug-induced Stevens-Johnson syndrome-toxic epidermal necrolysis overlap with a delayed onset in the setting of quetiapine and famotidine therapy. CASE PRESENTATION: An 82-year-old Taiwanese female was admitted to our hospital for decreased urine output, generalized edema, and multiple skin blisters and bedsores. With further spread of the lesions, multiple ruptured bullae with shallow erosions on the face, trunk, and limbs and mucosal involvement affected 20% of the total body surface area. Nikolsky's sign was positive. A diagnosis of Steven-Johnson syndrome was highly suspected. One month prior, she had started famotidine and quetiapine. Intravenous methylprednisolone treatment was initiated, which ameliorated the skin lesions after 3 days. However, new lesions developed after only 1 day of methylprednisolone tapering. The patient died 12 days after admission. CONCLUSION: Stevens-Johnson syndrome-toxic epidermal necrolysis is a rare skin disorder. Although it is mainly acute and has a high mortality rate, delayed onset can still occur. Quetiapine and famotidine are generally safe and effective for treating geriatric and gastrointestinal problems, but rare drug hypersensitivity reactions can lead to debilitating consequences. Therefore, increased clinical awareness and the initiation of supportive care are imperative. Optimal management guidelines are still lacking, and confirmation of developed guidelines through randomized controlled trials is needed. Collaboration for better management strategies is warranted.

Mortality risk and mood stabilizers in bipolar disorder: a propensity-score-weighted population-based cohort study in 2002-2018.

AIMS: Accumulating studies have assessed mortality risk associated with mood-stabilizers, the mainstay treatment for bipolar disorder (BD). However, existing data were mostly restricted to suicide risk, focused on lithium and valproate and rarely adequately adjusted for potential confounders. This study aimed to assess comparative mortality risk with all, natural and unnatural causes between lithium, valproate and three frequently prescribed second-generation antipsychotics (SGA), with adjustment for important confounders. METHODS: This population-based cohort study identified 8137 patients with first-diagnosed BD, who had exposed to lithium (n = 1028), valproate (n = 3580), olanzapine (n = 797), quetiapine (n = 1975) or risperidone (n = 757) between 2002 and 2018. Data were retrieved from territory-wide medical-record database of public healthcare services in Hong Kong. Propensity-score (PS)-weighting method was applied to optimize control for potential confounders including pre-existing chronic physical diseases, substance/alcohol use disorders and other psychotropic medications. PS-weighted Cox proportional-hazards regression was conducted to assess risk of all-, natural- and unnatural-cause mortality related to each mood-stabilizer, compared to lithium. Three sets of sensitivity analyses were conducted by restricting to patients with (i) length of cumulative exposure to specified mood-stabilizer ≥90 days and its medication possession ratio (MPR) ≥90%, (ii) MPR of specified mood-stabilizer ≥80% and MPR of other studied mood-stabilizers <20% and (iii) monotherapy. RESULTS: Incidence rates of all-cause mortality per 1000 person-years were 5.9 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.5-7.6), 8.4 (7.4-9.5), 11.1 (8.3-14.9), 7.4 (6.0-9.2) and 12.0 (9.3-15.6) for lithium-, valproate-, olanzapine-, quetiapine- and risperidone-treated groups, respectively. BD patients treated with olanzapine (PS-weighted hazard ratio = 2.07 [95% CI: 1.33-3.22]) and risperidone (1.66 [1.08-2.55]) had significantly higher all-cause mortality rate than lithium-treated group. Olanzapine was associated with increased risk of natural-cause mortality (3.04 [1.54-6.00]) and risperidone was related to elevated risk of unnatural-cause mortality (3.33 [1.62-6.86]), relative to lithium. The association between olanzapine and increased natural-cause mortality rate was consistently affirmed in sensitivity analyses. Relationship between risperidone and elevated unnatural-cause mortality became non-significant in sensitivity analyses restricted to low MPR in other mood-stabilizers and monotherapy. Valproate- and lithium-treated groups did not show significant differences in all-, natural- or unnatural-cause mortality risk. CONCLUSION: Our data showed that olanzapine and risperidone were associated with higher mortality risk than lithium, and further supported the clinical guidelines recommending lithium as the first-line mood-stabilizer for BD. Future research is required to further clarify comparative mortality risk associated with individual SGA agents to facilitate risk-benefit evaluation of alternative mood-stabilizers to minimize avoidable premature mortality in BD.

Recognition and Management of Delirium in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: Case Series From a Single-Center Level IV Intensive Care Unit.

Delirium often goes unrecognized in neonates and children because of lack of experience in evaluating behavior and cognition, insufficient awareness of the prevalence, and nondistinctive symptoms in this population. Although there are increasing reports of the presence of delirium in neonates, there are little data to guide the pharmacologic treatment in this population. In this retrospective single-center case series, we present our experience using quetiapine to treat delirium in 9 medically complex neonates. Based on an extensive literature review, expert opinion, and institutional experience, we propose an approach for monitoring and treating delirium in neonates and infants.

Physician Antipsychotic Overprescribing Letters and Cognitive, Behavioral, and Physical Health Outcomes Among People With Dementia: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Antipsychotics, such as quetiapine, are frequently prescribed to people with dementia to address behavioral symptoms but can also cause harm in this population. Objective: To determine whether warning letters to high prescribers of quetiapine can successfully reduce its use among patients with dementia and to investigate the impacts on patients' health outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This is a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial of overprescribing letters that began in April 2015 and included the highest-volume primary care physician (PCP) prescribers of quetiapine in original Medicare. Outcomes of patients with dementia were analyzed in repeated 90-day cross-sections through December 2018. Analyses were conducted from September 2021 to February 2024. Interventions: PCPs were randomized to a placebo letter or 3 overprescribing warning letters stating that their prescribing of quetiapine was high and under review by Medicare. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome of this analysis was patients' total quetiapine use in days per 90-day period (the original trial primary outcome was total quetiapine prescribing by study PCPs). Prespecified secondary outcomes included measures of cognitive function and behavioral symptoms from nursing home assessments, indicators of depression from screening questionnaires in assessments and diagnoses in claims, metabolic diagnoses derived from assessments and claims, indicators of use of the hospital and other health care services, and death. Outcomes were analyzed separately for patients living in nursing homes and in the community. Results: Of the 5055 study PCPs, 2528 were randomized to the placebo letter, and 2527 were randomized to the 3 warning letters. A total of 84 881 patients with dementia living in nursing homes and 261 288 community-dwelling patients with dementia were attributed to these PCPs. There were 92 874 baseline patients (mean [SD] age, 81.5 [10.5] years; 64 242 female [69.2%]). The intervention reduced quetiapine use among both nursing home patients (adjusted difference, -0.7 days; 95% CI, -1.3 to -0.1 days; P = .02) and community-dwelling patients (adjusted difference, -1.5 days; 95% CI, -1.8 to -1.1 days; P < .001). There were no detected adverse effects on cognitive function (cognitive function scale adjusted difference, 0.01; 95% CI, -0.01 to 0.03; P = .19), behavioral symptoms (agitated or reactive behavior adjusted difference, -0.2%; 95% CI -1.2% to 0.8% percentage points; P = .72), depression, metabolic diagnoses, or more severe outcomes, including hospitalization and death. Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that overprescribing warning letters to PCPs safely reduced quetiapine prescribing to their patients with dementia. This intervention and others like it may be useful for future efforts to promote guideline-concordant care. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05172687.

Quetiapine Significantly Improves the Effectiveness of Radiotherapy in Combating Hepatocellular Carcinoma Progression in a Hep3B Xenograft Mouse Model.

BACKGROUND/AIM: In hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment, radiotherapy (RT) stands as a pivotal approach, yet the emergence of radioresistance poses a formidable challenge. This study aimed to explore the potential synergy between quetiapine and RT for HCC treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Hep3B xenograft mouse model was used, the investigation tracked tumor progression, safety parameters, and molecular mechanisms. RESULTS: The findings revealed a synergistic anti-HCC effect when quetiapine was coupled with RT that prolonged tumor growth time and a significantly higher growth inhibition rate compared to the control group. Safety assessments indicated minimal pathological changes, suggesting potential of quetiapine in mitigating RT-induced alterations in liver and kidney functions. Mechanistically, the combination suppressed metastasis and angiogenesis-related proteins, while triggering the activation of apoptosis-related proteins via targeting Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mediated signaling. CONCLUSION: The potential of the quetiapine and RT combination is emphasized, offering enhanced anti-HCC efficacy, a safety profile, and positioning quetiapine as a radiosensitizer for HCC treatment.

Serum S100B protein and white matter changes in schizophrenia before and after medication.

Schizophrenia patients have abnormalities in white matter (WM) integrity in brain regions. S100B has been shown to be a marker protein for glial cells. The atypical antipsychotics have neuroprotective effects on the brain. It is not clear whether antipsychotics can induce S100B changes and improve symptoms by protecting oligodendrocytes. To investigate WM and S100B changes and associations and determine the effect of quetiapine on WM and S100B in schizophrenia patients, we determined serum S100B levels with solid phase immunochromatography and fractional anisotropy（FA）values of 36 patients and 40 healthy controls. Patients exhibited significantly higher serum concentrations of S100B and decreased FA values in left postcentral，right superior frontal，right thalamus, and left inferior occipital gyrus, while higher in right temporal cortex WM compared with healthy controls. Following treatment with quetiapine, patients had decreased S100B and higher FA values in right cerebellum，right superior frontal，right thalamus, and left parietal cortex，and decreased FA values in right temporal cortex WM compared with pre-treatment values. Furthermore, S100B were negatively correlated with PANSS positive scores and positively correlated with FA values in the left postcentral cortex. In addition，the percentage change in FA values in the right temporal cortex was positively correlated with the percentage change in the S100B, percentage reduction in PANSS scores, and percentage reduction in PANSS-positive scores. Our findings demonstrated abnormalities in S100B and WM microstructure in patients with schizophrenia. These abnormalities may be partly reversed by quetiapine treatment.

Molecular mechanisms of quetiapine bidirectional regulation of bipolar depression and mania based on network pharmacology and molecular docking: Evidence from computational biology.

BACKGROUND: Quetiapine monotherapy is recommended as the first-line option for acute mania and acute bipolar depression. However, the mechanism of action of quetiapine is unclear. Network pharmacology and molecular docking were employed to determine the molecular mechanisms of quetiapine bidirectional regulation of bipolar depression and mania. METHODS: Putative target genes for quetiapine were collected from the GeneCard, SwissTargetPrediction, and DrugBank databases. Targets for bipolar depression and bipolar mania were identified from the DisGeNET and GeneCards databases. A protein-protein interaction (PPI) network was generated using the String database and imported into Cytoscape. DAVID and the Bioinformatics platform were employed to perform the Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analyses of the top 15 core targets. The drug-pathway-target-disease network was constructed using Cytoscape. Finally, molecular docking was performed to evaluate the interactions between quetiapine and potential targets. RESULTS: Targets for quetiapine actions against bipolar depression (126 targets) and bipolar mania (81 targets) were identified. Based on PPI and KEGG pathway analyses, quetiapine may affect bipolar depression by targeting the MAPK and PI3K/AKT insulin signaling pathways via BDNF, INS, EGFR, IGF1, and NGF, and it may affect bipolar mania by targeting the neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction signaling pathway via HTR1A, HTR1B, HTR2A, DRD2, and GRIN2B. Molecular docking revealed good binding affinity between quetiapine and potential targets. LIMITATIONS: Pharmacological experiments should be conducted to verify and further explore these results. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that quetiapine affects bipolar depression and bipolar mania through distinct biological core targets, and thus through different mechanisms. Furthermore, our results provide a theoretical basis for the clinical use of quetiapine and possible directions for new drug development.

Parkinson's disease psychosis management: an evidence based, experience informed, pragmatic approach.

INTRODUCTION: Psychotic symptoms in people with Parkinson's disease (PD) have attracted increasing. Recommendations on treating psychosis often fail to take into account what psychotic symptoms require treatment, which has been complicated by the increasing number of reports documenting the frequency of 'minor' hallucinations. AREAS COVERED: This article focuses both on the phenomenology of psychotic symptoms and their management. EXPERT OPINION: Understanding the nature and implications of the types of psychotic symptoms in PD is the key to proper treatment. Evidence and experience-based data on the effect of anti-psychotic medications will be reviewed and how the various clinical settings should determine the treatment approach. The evidence base consists of all reported blinded trials recorded in PubMed and the experience-based studies are those chosen by the author from PubMed as illustrative. Specific recommendations for the treatment of psychosis will be listed for specific situations. Pimavanserin is the first-line choice for mild symptoms; quetiapine for symptoms that require improvement in a short period and clozapine for urgent problems or those which fail the other approaches.

Psychotic symptoms are common in PD, affecting the majority of patients by the time of death. 'Minor hallucinations' rarely require treatment but formed hallucinations and delusions often do. The vast majority of patients requiring treatment are on medications for PD motor problems. Some patients can be treated with reduction of psychoactive medications that are unrelated to PD, and some may tolerate reductions in PD medications without intolerable worsening of motor function. The remainder require treatment with medications that reduce psychotic symptoms, which include cholinesterase inhibitors, clozapine, pimavanserin, and possibly quetiapine and electroconvulsive therapy. Only clozapine and pimavanserin have unequivocal evidence for efficacy and motor tolerance. Data will be reviewed in support of each of these medications will be reviewed and pragmatic suggestions based on a large experience on when each might be used, and in what order they may be tried if initial approaches fail.

Second-generation antipsychotics for Parkinson's disease psychosis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This network meta-analysis assessed the efficacy, tolerability, and acceptability of second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) for Parkinson's disease psychosis (PDP). METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized controlled trials investigating SGAs for PDP up to October 26, 2023. RESULTS: We included 16 trials (N = 1252) investigating clozapine, melperone, olanzapine, pimavanserin, quetiapine, ulotaront, and placebo. In comparisons between SGAs and placebo, the findings were: i) Standardized mean differences, 95% confidence intervals (SMDs, 95%CIs), for psychotic-symptom reduction revealed the first rank of clozapine (-1.31, -1.73 to -0.89), the second rank of pimavanserin, with significant inferiority of quetiapine (SMD = 0.47, 0.02 to 0.92); ii) Mean differences (MDs, 95%CIs) for abnormal movement, as assessed by the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale - Part III, indicated that clozapine had the least motor side effects (-0.92, -2.75 to 0.91); iii) Risk ratios (RRs, 95% CIs) for adverse-effect dropout rates were lowest for melperone (1.02, 0.20 to 5.24); and iv) RRs (95% CIs) for all-cause dropout rates were lowest for clozapine (0.73, 0.42 to 1.25). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with PDP, clozapine may substantially reduce psychotic symptoms with minimal abnormal movement, high acceptability, and moderate overall tolerability. Pimavanserin, not quetiapine, could be an alternative.

Case report: Uncovering hidden glucose patterns in medicated versus unmedicated bipolar disorder and comorbid type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Introduction: Type 1 diabetes mellitus is characterized by an absolute insulin deficiency requiring the lifetime intensive insulin therapy accompanied by daily self-monitoring, self-management, ongoing education, and complex diabetes care. Regular patient-clinician shared therapeutic decisions based on age, sex, comorbidities, medications, predicted impact of meals, physical activity, stress, hormonal changes, insulin therapy, and patterns of glycemic changes are key for achieving glycemic targets. The impact of various phases of bipolar disorder and their treatment on continuous glucose levels remains unexplored and calls for future assessments. Case presentation: The present case reports a 41-year-old Caucasian female with an established diagnosis of bipolar II disorder and type 1 diabetes mellitus who discontinued long-term mood-stabilizing pharmacotherapy with quetiapine. Real-time continuous glucose monitoring performed before and 6-months following the discontinuation of quetiapine revealed hidden glucose patterns in medicated versus unmedicated bipolar disorder. Despite the known adverse metabolic effects of quetiapine, the continuous glucose monitoring captured more stable and near-normal continuous glucose values during the antipsychotic treatment compared to unmedicated stages of bipolar disorder with considerably higher glucose values and glucose variability. Conclusion: The case report highlights the importance of the ongoing psychopharmacotherapy of bipolar disorder in comorbid type 1 diabetes mellitus to reduce mood-induced reactivity, emotional urgency, and non-emotional impulsivity that may contribute to dysglycemia. If not effectively treated, the "bipolar diabetes" is likely to progress to multiple psychiatric and somatic complications. The bidirectional links between the phases of bipolar disorder and the corresponding continuous glucose patterns can help advance clinical decision-making and yield innovative1 research that can translate into efficacious clinical practice.

Mortality and Lithium-Protective Effects after First-Episode Mania Diagnosis in Bipolar Disorder: A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study in Taiwan.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to estimate all-cause mortality in patients after a first-episode mania (FEM) and examine whether six guideline-recommended medications can reduce mortality. METHODS: The cohort included population-based FEM samples and matched controls from Taiwan, spanning 2007 to 2018. The primary outcomes assessed were all-cause/suicide-related mortality, while the secondary outcome focused on mortality associated with pharmacological treatments. We compared mortality in post-FEM patients and age-/sex-matched controls without any diagnosed bipolar disorders and patients with and without psychopharmacological treatment using Cox regression analysis, respectively. Statistics were presented with time-to-event adjusted hazard ratios (AHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: The study included 54,092 post-FEM patients and 270,460 controls, totaling 2,467,417 person-years of follow-up. Post-FEM patients had higher risks of all-cause mortality (AHR 2.38, 95% CI: 2.31-2.45) and suicide death (10.80, 5.88-19.84) than controls. Lithium (0.62, 0.55-0.70), divalproex (0.89, 0.83-0.95), and aripiprazole (0.81, 0.66-1.00) were associated with reduced all-cause mortality compared to non-users. There were no significant all-cause mortality differences for quetiapine (0.95, 0.89-1.01), risperidone (0.92, 0.82-1.02), and paliperidone (1.24, 0.88-1.76) users. When accounting for drug action onset times in sensitivity analyses, only lithium significantly reduced all-cause mortality (AHR range 0.65-0.72). There were 35 and 16 suicide deaths in post-FEM patients and controls, respectively. No drug had a significant effect on suicide deaths (lithium: 6; divalproex: 7; aripiprazole: 0; quetiapine: 10; risperidone: 4; paliperidone: 1). CONCLUSION: Post-FEM patients had a higher risk of all-cause/suicide-related mortality, and lithium treatment might reduce all-cause mortality.

The impact of CYP3A5*3 on oral quetiapine: A population pharmacokinetic model in Chinese bipolar disorder patients.

BACKGROUND: There is great interindividual difference in the plasma concentration of quetiapine, and optimizing quetiapine therapy to achieve a balance between efficacy and safety is still a challenge. In our study, a population pharmacokinetic (PPK) model considering genetic information was developed with the expectation of comprehensively explaining this observation in Chinese patients with bipolar disorder. METHODS: Patients who were dispensed quetiapine and underwent the therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) were included. The genotypes of CYP3A5*3, CYP2D6*10, and ABCB1 C3435T/G2677T were analyzed. Finally, a multivariable linear regression model was applied to describe the PPK of quetiapine considering the covariates weight, height and genotype information. RESULTS: A total of 175 TDM points from 107 patients were adopted for PPK model development. Resultantly, the CL/F of quetiapine in CYP3A5 expressers was 81.1 CL/h, whereas it was 43.6 CL/h in CYP3A5 nonexpressers. The interindividual variability in CL/F was 47.7 %. However, neither the ABCB1 nor CYP2D6 genotype was significantly associated with the predictor of quetiapine clearance in our study. LIMITATIONS: Only trough concentrations were collected, and the span between different points was relatively wide, impeding the application of the typical nonlinear compartment model for PPK analysis. In addition, this was a single-center study which limited the sample of wild-type CYP3A5 carriers. CONCLUSIONS: The currently established PPK model of quetiapine considering the contribution of the CYP3A5 genotype could efficiently predict the population and individual pharmacokinetic parameters of Chinese bipolar disorder patients, which could better guide the personalized therapy with quetiapine, thus to achieve the best clinical response.

The impact of quetiapine monotherapy or in combination with lithium on the thyroid function in patients with bipolar depression: A retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate whether quetiapine monotherapy or in combination with lithium significantly disturbs thyroid function in depressed patients with bipolar disorder (BD), and whether difference exists in the post-treatment thyroid function between the two therapies. METHODS: Based on the electric medical records, outpatients and inpatients with a current depressive episode of BD from January 2016 to December 2022 were screened. All patients were treated with quetiapine monotherapy or in combination with lithium. In addition to the demographic data and depression scale, thyroid profiles including total thyroxine (TT4), total triiodothyronine (TT3), free thyroxine (FT4), free triiodothyronine (FT3), thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), thyroid peroxidase antibody (TPOAb), and antithyroglobulin antibody (TGAb) were recorded, analyzed, and compared before and after the treatment. RESULTS: Totally, 73 eligible patients were enrolled, including 53 in the monotherapy group (MG) and 20 in the combined therapy group (CG). No significant differences in thyroid profiles were detected between the two groups at the baseline (p > 0.05). After one-month treatment, in the MG, serum levels of TT4, TT3, FT4, and FT3 reduced significantly (p < 0.05), while TSH, TPOAb, and TGAb increased significantly (p < 0.05). In the CG, serum levels of TT4, TT3, and FT4 reduced and TSH increased following one-month treatment (p < 0.05), with no significant change in FT3, TPOAb, or TGAb (p > 0.05). After one-month treatment, no difference of TT4, TT3, FT4, FT3, and TSH was found between the two groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Both quetiapine monotherapy and a combined therapy with lithium significantly disturbed thyroid function in patients with bipolar depression, while quetiapine monotherapy seems to be associated with immune dysregulation in the thyroid.

Factors associated with the initiation of laxative use in the same patients with schizophrenia over a 20-year period: Retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Constipation is a common adverse effect of antipsychotics, but little investigation has been conducted. We aimed to address the factors associated with the initiation of laxative use in the same patients with schizophrenia over a 20-year period. METHODS: We enrolled patients with schizophrenia attending each hospital (n = 14) from April 1, 2021, and retrospectively examined all prescriptions as of April 1, 2016, 2011, 2006, and 2001, every 5 years starting in 2021, for this population. 716 participants with complete data were included in the analysis. The Cochran Q test followed by Bonferroni correction and the Cochran-Armitage trend test were used to determine the differences and trends of the frequency of each laxative. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the factors on the initiation of laxative use over a 20-year period. RESULTS: Of the patients, 25.1% were treated with laxatives in 2001, and 34.1% were treated in 2021. The numbers of patients treated with any laxatives significantly differed over the 20-year period, with a significant increasing trend. In all laxatives, the numbers of patients treated with magnesium oxide, lubiprostone and elobixibat differed with a significant increasing trend. Female sex, age, the total DZP equivalent dose, and the doses of levomepromazine maleate, olanzapine, quetiapine, zotepine, lithium, and carbamazepine in 2021 were significant factors associated with the initiation of laxative use over the 20-year period. CONCLUSIONS: Careful monitoring is needed for patients treated with levomepromazine maleate, olanzapine, quetiapine and zotepine. Optimizing prescriptions according to treatment guidelines could reduce antipsychotic-induced constipation.