Clinical characteristics and treatment patterns of patients with NTRK fusion-positive solid tumors: A multisite cohort study at US academic cancer centers.

BACKGROUND: Neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) gene fusions are rare oncogenic drivers prevalent in 0.3% of solid tumors. They are most common in salivary gland cancer (2.6%), thyroid cancer (1.6%), and soft-tissue sarcoma (1.5%). Currently, there are 2 US Food and Drug Administration-approved targeted therapies for NTRK gene fusions: larotrectinib, approved in 2018, and entrectinib, approved in 2019. To date, the real-world uptake of tyrosine receptor kinase inhibitor (TRKi) use for NTRK-positive solid tumors in academic cancer centers remains largely unknown. OBJECTIVE: To describe the demographics, clinical and genomic characteristics, and testing and treatment patterns of patients with NTRK-positive solid tumors treated at US academic cancer centers. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review study conducted in academic cancer centers in the United States. All patients diagnosed with an NTRK fusion-positive (NTRK1, NTRK2, NTRK3) solid tumor (any stage) and who received cancer treatment at participating sites between January 1, 2012, and July 1, 2023, were included in this study. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, genomic characteristics, NTRK testing data, and treatment patterns were collected from electronic medical records and analyzed using descriptive statistics as appropriate. RESULTS: In total, 6 centers contributed data for 55 patients with NTRK-positive tumors. The mean age was 49.3 (SD = 20.5) years, 51% patients were female, and the majority were White (78%). The median duration of time from cancer diagnosis to NTRK testing was 85 days (IQR = 44-978). At the time of NTRK testing, 64% of patients had stage IV disease, compared with 33% at cancer diagnosis. Prevalent cancer types in the overall cohort included head and neck (15%), thyroid (15%), brain (13%), lung (13%), and colorectal (11%). NTRK1 fusions were most common (45%), followed by NTRK3 (40%) and NTRK2 (15%). Across all lines of therapy, 51% of patients (n = 28) received a TRKi. Among TRKi-treated patients, 71% had stage IV disease at TRKi initiation. The median time from positive NTRK test to initiation of TRKi was 48 days (IQR = 9-207). TRKis were commonly given as first-line (30%) or second-line (48%) therapies. Median duration of therapy was 610 (IQR = 182-764) days for TRKi use and 207.5 (IQR = 42-539) days for all other first-line therapies. CONCLUSIONS: This study reports on contemporary real-world NTRK testing patterns and use of TRKis in solid tumors, including time between NTRK testing and initiation of TRKi therapy and duration of TRKi therapy.

Neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase gene fusions in adult and pediatric patients with solid tumors: a clinicogenomic biobank and record linkage study of expression frequency and patient characteristics from Finland.

BACKGROUND: Neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) gene fusions are oncogenic drivers. Using the Auria Biobank in Finland, we aimed to identify and characterize patients with these gene fusions, and describe their clinical and tumor characteristics, treatments received, and outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We evaluated pediatrics with any solid tumor type and adults with colorectal cancer (CRC), non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), sarcoma, or salivary gland cancer. We determined tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) protein expression by pan-TRK immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining of tumor samples from the Auria Biobank, scored by a certified pathologist. NTRK gene fusion was confirmed by next generation sequencing (NGS). All 2,059 patients were followed-up starting 1 year before their cancer diagnosis. RESULTS: Frequency of NTRK gene fusion tumors was 3.1% (4/127) in pediatrics, 0.7% (8/1,151) for CRC, 0.3% (1/288) for NSCLC, 0.9% (1/114) for salivary gland cancer, and 0% (0/379) for sarcoma. Among pediatrics there was one case each of fibrosarcoma (TPM3::NTRK1), Ewing's sarcoma (LPPR1::NTRK2), primitive neuroectodermal tumor (DAB2IP::NTRK2), and papillary thyroid carcinoma (RAD51B::NTRK3). Among CRC patients, six harbored tumors with NTRK1 fusions (three fused with TPM3), one harbored a NTRK3::GABRG1 fusion, and the other a NTRK2::FXN/LPPR1 fusion. Microsatellite instability was higher in CRC patients with NTRK gene fusion tumors versus wild-type tumors (50.0% vs. 4.4%). Other detected fusions were SGCZ::NTRK3 (NSCLC) and ETV6::NTRK3 (salivary gland cancer). Four patients (three CRC, one NSCLC) received chemotherapy; one patient (with CRC) received radiotherapy. CONCLUSION: NTRK gene fusions are rare in adult CRC, NSCLC, salivary tumors, sarcoma, and pediatric solid tumors.

A comparison of the histopathologic features of thyroid carcinomas with NTRK fusions to those with other malignant fusions.

BACKGROUND: Chromosomal rearrangements involving one of the NTRK genes result in oncogenic driver mutations in thyroid carcinoma (TC) and serve as a target for therapy. We compared the clinicopathologic features of thyroid carcinomas with NTRK fusions vs. thyroid neoplasms with other malignancy associated gene fusions within our institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our pathology archives were searched from 2013 to 2023 for thyroid neoplasms with gene fusions, excluding THADA fusions and medullary thyroid carcinomas. RESULTS: 55 thyroid lesions were identified: 22 with NTRK fusions (NTRK cohort) and 33 with other fusions (non-NTRK cohort). On fine needle aspiration (FNA), 54% of the NTRK cohort were classified as Category V as per Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytology (TBSRTC) and 51.5% of non-NTRK cohort as TBSRTC Category III. In the NTRK cohort, the most common reported fusion was ETV6::NTRK3 and the most common reported fusion in the non-NTRK cohort was PAX8::PPAR-gamma. On histologic examination both cohorts were most commonly diagnosed as PTC follicular variant. Invasive features were more common in the NTRK cohort in comparison to the non-NTRK cohort. Locoregional recurrence occurred in 2/22 NTRK cases and 2/33 non-NTRK cases, with average time from surgery to recurrence being 5.5 months and 21 months, respectively. The majority of patients in both groups are alive with no evidence of disease. CONCLUSIONS: Thyroid neoplasms with a malignancy associated gene fusion are likely to be diagnosed as subtype/variant of PTC. Patients whose thyroid lesions harbor NTRK fusions present with a PTC-FV that on presentation has more aggressive clinicopathologic findings and are likely to have earlier disease recurrence.

Feasibility of two-step approach for screening NTRK fusion in two major subtypes of non-small cell lung cancer within a large cohort.

Our objective is to investigate a cost-effective approach to screen for NTRK fusion in the major subtypes of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Evaluate the concordance between immunohistochemistry (IHC) and next-generation sequencing (NGS), as well as between fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and NGS, to detect any discrepancies in methodological consistency between lung adenocarcinoma (LADC) and lung squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC). Analyze the factors influencing IHC results. A cohort of 1654 patients with NSCLC underwent screening for NTRK fusion using whole slide IHC. The positive cases were analyzed by both FISH and NGS. Totally, 57 tested positive for pan-TRK, with positivity rates of 0.68% (10/1467) for LADC and 29.01% (47/162) for LSCC. FISH showed separate NTRK1 and NTRK3 rearrangements in two pan-TRK-positive LADCs, while all LSCCs tested negative. NGS confirmed functional NTRK fusion in two FISH-positive cases: one involving TPM3-NTRK1 and the other involving SQSTM1-NTRK3. A non-functional fusion of NTRK2-XRCC1 was detected in LSCC, while FISH was negative. According to our approach, the prevalence of NTRK fusion in NSCLC is 0.12%. The concordance rate between IHC and RNA-based NGS was 20% (2/10) in LADC and 0% (0/162) in LSCC. When the positive criteria increased over 50% of tumor cells showing strong staining, the concordance would be 100% (2/2). A concordance rate of 100% (2/2) was observed between FISH and RNA-based NGS in LADC. The expression of pan-TRK was significantly correlated with the tumor proportion score (TPS) of PD-L1 (p < 0.05) and transcript per million (TPM) values of NTRK2 (p < 0.05). We recommend using IHC with strict criteria to screen NTRK fusion in LADC rather than LSCC, confirmed by RNA-based NGS directly. When the NGS results are inconclusive, FISH validation is necessary.

Prevalence of neurotrophic tropomyosin receptor kinase (NTRK) fusion gene positivity in patients with solid tumors in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Members of the neurotrophic tropomyosin receptor kinase (NTRK) gene family, NTRK1, NTRK2, and NTRK3 encode TRK receptor tyrosine kinases. Intra- or inter-chromosomal gene rearrangements produce NTRK gene fusions encoding fusion proteins which are oncogenic drivers in various solid tumors. METHODS: This study investigated the prevalence of NTRK fusion genes and identified fusion partners in Japanese patients with solid tumors recorded in the Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics database of comprehensive genomic profiling test. RESULTS: In the analysis population (n = 46,621), NTRK fusion genes were detected in 91 patients (0.20%). The rate was higher in pediatric cases (<18 years; 1.69%) than in adults (0.16%). NTRK gene fusions were identified in 21 different solid tumor types involving 38 different partner genes including 22 (57.9%) previously unreported NTRK gene fusions. The highest frequency of NTRK gene fusions was head and neck cancer (1.31%) and thyroid cancer (1.31%), followed by soft tissue sarcoma (STS; 0.91%). A total of 97 NTRK fusion gene partners were analyzed involving mainly NTRK1 (49.5%) or NTRK3 (44.2%) gene fusions. The only fusion gene detected in head and neck cancer was ETV6::NTRK3 (n = 22); in STS, ETV6::NTRK3 (n = 7) and LMNA::NTRK1 (n = 5) were common. Statistically significant mutual exclusivity of NTRK fusions with alterations was confirmed in TP53, KRAS, and APC. NTRK gene fusion was detected from 11 STS cases: seven unclassified sarcoma, three sarcoma NOS, and one Ewing sarcoma. CONCLUSIONS: NTRK gene fusion identification in solid tumors enables accurate diagnosis and potential TRK inhibitor therapy.

Beyond Clinical Trials: Understanding Neurotrophic Tropomyosin Receptor Kinase Inhibitor Challenges and Efficacy in Real-World Pediatric Oncology.

PURPOSE: Our study aimed to explore real-world treatment scenarios for children and adolescents with neurotrophic tropomyosin receptor kinase (NTRK)-fused tumors, emphasizing access, responses, side effects, and outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Pooled clinical data from 17 pediatric cases (11 soft-tissue sarcomas, five brain tumors, and one neuroblastoma) treated with larotrectinib and radiologic images for 14 patients were centrally reviewed. Testing for gene fusions was prompted by poor response to treatment, tumor progression, or aggressiveness. RESULTS: Six different NTRK fusion subtypes were detected, and various payment sources for testing and medication were reported. Radiologic review revealed objective tumor responses (OR) in 11 of 14 patients: Complete responses: two; partial responses: nine; and stable disease: three cases. Grades 1 or 2 Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events adverse effects were reported in five patients. Regarding the entire cohort's clinical information, 15 of 17 patients remain alive (median observation time: 25 months): four with no evidence of disease and 11 alive with disease (10 without progression). One patient developed resistance to the NTRK inhibitor and died from disease progression while another patient died due to an unrelated cause. CONCLUSION: This real-world study confirms favorable agnostic tumor OR rates to larotrectinib in children with NTRK-fused tumors. Better coordination to facilitate access to medication remains a challenge, particularly in middle-income countries like Brazil.

NTRK3 exhibits a pro-oncogenic function in upper tract urothelial carcinomas.

Neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase 3 (NTRK3) has pleiotropic functions: it acts not only as an oncogene in breast and gastric cancers but also as a dependence receptor in tumor suppressor genes in colon cancer and neuroblastomas. However, the role of NTRK3 in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is not well documented. This study investigated the association between NTRK3 expression and outcomes in UTUC patients and validated the results in tests on UTUC cell lines. A total of 118 UTUC cancer tissue samples were examined to evaluate the expression of NTRK3. Survival curves were generated using Kaplan-Meier estimates, and Cox regression models were used for investigating survival outcomes. Higher NTRK3 expression was correlated with worse progression-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival. Moreover, the results of an Ingenuity Pathway Analysis suggested that NTRK3 may interact with the PI3K-AKT-mTOR signaling pathway to promote cancer. NTRK3 downregulation in BFTC909 cells through shRNA reduced cellular migration, invasion, and activity in the AKT-mTOR pathway. Furthermore, the overexpression of NTRK3 in UM-UC-14 cells promoted AKT-mTOR pathway activity, cellular migration, and cell invasion. From these observations, we concluded that NTRK3 may contribute to aggressive behaviors in UTUC by facilitating cell migration and invasion through its interaction with the AKT-mTOR pathway and the expression of NTRK3 is a potential predictor of clinical outcomes in cases of UTUC.

Predictors of radioiodine (RAI)-avidity restoration for NTRK fusion-positive RAI-resistant metastatic thyroid cancers.

Context: Two-thirds of metastatic differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) patients have radioiodine (RAI)-resistant disease, resulting in poor prognosis and high mortality. For rare NTRK and RET fusion-positive metastatic, RAI-resistant thyroid cancers, variable success of re-induction of RAI avidity during treatment with NTRK or RET inhibitors has been reported. Case presentation and results: We report two cases with RAI-resistant lung metastases treated with larotrectinib: an 83-year-old male presenting with an ETV6::NTRK3 fusion-positive tumor with the TERT promoter mutation c.-124C>T, and a 31-year-old female presenting with a TPR::NTRK1 fusion-positive tumor (and negative for TERT promoter mutation). Post larotrectinib treatment, diagnostic I-123 whole body scan revealed unsuccessful RAI-uptake re-induction in the TERT-positive tumor, with a thyroid differentiation score (TDS) of -0.287. In contrast, the TERT-negative tumor exhibited successful I-131 reuptake with a TDS of -0.060. Conclusion: As observed for RAI-resistance associated with concurrent TERT and BRAF mutations, the co-occurrence of TERT mutations and NTRK fusions may also contribute to re-sensitization failure.

A morphological mimic: An NTRK3-rearranged spindle cell neoplasm presenting as a groin mass.

Neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase (NTRK)-rearranged spindle cell neoplasms are a recently described group of soft tissue tumors. They commonly present as a painless mass on the extremities of children and young adults. They are characterized microscopically by a heterogeneous spectrum of infiltrative spindle cell proliferations, which can morphologically mimic several other spindle cell neoplasms. Their identification is vital, as they may be amenable to treatment with tyrosine kinase-targeted therapy. This case report describes a rare NTRK3-rearranged spindle cell neoplasm in the groin of a 29-year-old female and provides further clinical and morphological features of this entity.

NT-3 contributes to chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain through TrkC-mediated CCL2 elevation in DRG neurons.

Cancer patients undergoing treatment with antineoplastic drugs often experience chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain (CINP), and the therapeutic options for managing CINP are limited. Here, we show that systemic paclitaxel administration upregulates the expression of neurotrophin-3 (Nt3) mRNA and NT3 protein in the neurons of dorsal root ganglia (DRG), but not in the spinal cord. Blocking NT3 upregulation attenuates paclitaxel-induced mechanical, heat, and cold nociceptive hypersensitivities and spontaneous pain without altering acute pain and locomotor activity in male and female mice. Conversely, mimicking this increase produces enhanced responses to mechanical, heat, and cold stimuli and spontaneous pain in naive male and female mice. Mechanistically, NT3 triggers tropomyosin receptor kinase C (TrkC) activation and participates in the paclitaxel-induced increases of C-C chemokine ligand 2 (Ccl2) mRNA and CCL2 protein in the DRG. Given that CCL2 is an endogenous initiator of CINP and that Nt3 mRNA co-expresses with TrkC and Ccl2 mRNAs in DRG neurons, NT3 likely contributes to CINP through TrkC-mediated activation of the Ccl2 gene in DRG neurons. NT3 may be thus a potential target for CINP treatment.

Prevalence and detection methodology for preliminary exploration of NTRK fusion in gastric cancer from a single-center retrospective cohort.

The fusion of neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) is a novel target for cancer therapy and offers hope for patients with gastric cancer (GC). However, there are few studies on the prevalence and detection methods of NTRK fusions in GC. In this study, we used immunohistochemistry (IHC) as a screening method to select cases for molecular testing and evaluated the effectiveness of IHC, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and next-generation sequencing (NGS). We retrospectively collected 1970 patients with GC. Pan-TRK IHC was conducted in all cases, and three cases were positive: one with strong and diffuse cytoplasmic staining, while two with weak cytoplasmic staining. All three cases were validated using NTRK1/2/3 FISH. FISH results revealed a single 3' signal of NTRK1 in 95% of the tumor cells in the first case, while the remaining two cases were negative. NGS confirmed LMNA-NTRK1 fusion in the first case, with no gene fusion detected in the other two cases. Out of 46 negative controls, one had a non-functional fusion of IGR-NTRK1, and four had point mutations. The case with LMNA-NTRK1 fusion were negative for pMMR, EBV, HER2, and AFP. The pan-TRK IHC showed a 33.33% (1/3) concordance rate with RNA-based NGS. If the criterion for positivity was 3+ cytoplasmic staining, the agreement between IHC and RNA-based NGS was 100% (1/1). In conclusion, the incidence of NTRK fusion in GC is extremely low (0.05%). If the criteria are strict, pan-TRK IHC is highly effective for screening NTRK fusions. FISH could complement NGS detection, particularly when NTRK fusion is detected by DNA sequencing. NTRK fusion in GC may not be limited to specific subtypes.

RAF1 gene fusions are recurrent driver events in infantile fibrosarcoma-like mesenchymal tumors.

Infantile fibrosarcomas (IFS) and congenital mesoblastic nephroma (CMN) are rare myofibroblastic tumors of infancy and early childhood commonly harboring the ETV6::NTRK3 gene fusion. IFS/CMN are considered as tumors with an 'intermediate prognosis' as they are locally aggressive, but rarely metastasize, and generally have a favorable outcome. A fraction of IFS/CMN-related neoplasms are negative for the ETV6::NTRK3 gene rearrangement and are characterized by other chimeric proteins promoting MAPK signaling upregulation. In a large proportion of these tumors, which are classified as IFS-like mesenchymal neoplasms, the contributing molecular events remain to be identified. Here, we report three distinct rearrangements involving RAF1 among eight ETV6::NTRK3 gene fusion-negative tumors with an original histological diagnosis of IFS/CMN. The three fusion proteins retain the entire catalytic domain of the kinase. Two chimeric products, GOLGA4::RAF1 and LRRFIP2::RAF1, had previously been reported as driver events in different cancers, whereas the third, CLIP1::RAF1, represents a novel fusion protein. We demonstrate that CLIP1::RAF1 acts as a bona fide oncoprotein promoting cell proliferation and migration through constitutive upregulation of MAPK signaling. We show that the CLIP1::RAF1 hyperactive behavior does not require RAS activation and is mediated by constitutive 14-3-3 protein-independent dimerization of the chimeric protein. As previously reported for the ETV6::NTRK3 fusion protein, CLIP1::RAF1 similarly upregulates PI3K-AKT signaling. Our findings document that RAF1 gene rearrangements represent a recurrent event in ETV6::NTRK3-negative IFS/CMN and provide a rationale for the use of inhibitors directed to suppress MAPK and PI3K-AKT signaling in these cancers. © 2024 The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Estimating the Prognostic Value of the NTRK Fusion Biomarker for Comparative Effectiveness Research in The Netherlands.

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the prognostic value of the neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) gene fusions by comparing the survival of patients with NTRK+ tumours with patients without NTRK+ tumours. METHODS: We used genomic and clinical registry data from the Center for Personalized Cancer Treatment (CPCT-02) study containing a cohort of cancer patients who were treated in Dutch clinical practice between 2012 and 2020. We performed a propensity score matching analysis, where NTRK+ patients were matched to NTRK- patients in a 1:4 ratio. We subsequently analysed the survival of the matched sample of NTRK+ and NTRK- patients using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression, and performed an analysis of credibility to evaluate the plausibility of our result. RESULTS: Among 3556 patients from the CPCT-02 study with known tumour location, 24 NTRK+ patients were identified. NTRK+ patients were distributed across nine different tumour types: bone/soft tissue, breast, colorectal, head and neck, lung, pancreas, prostate, skin and urinary tract. NTRK fusions involving the NTRK3 gene (46%) and NTRK1 gene (33%) were most common. The survival analysis rendered a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.44 (95% CI 0.81-2.55) for NTRK+ patients. Using the point estimates of three prior studies on the prognostic value of NTRK fusions, our finding that the HR is > 1 was deemed plausible. CONCLUSIONS: NTRK+ patients may have an increased risk of death compared with NTRK- patients. When using historic control data to assess the comparative effectiveness of TRK inhibitors, the prognostic value of the NTRK fusion biomarker should therefore be accounted for.

The amygdala NT3-TrkC pathway underlies inter-individual differences in fear extinction and related synaptic plasticity.

Fear-related pathologies are among the most prevalent psychiatric conditions, having inappropriate learned fear and resistance to extinction as cardinal features. Exposure therapy represents a promising therapeutic approach, the efficiency of which depends on inter-individual variation in fear extinction learning, which neurobiological basis is unknown. We characterized a model of extinction learning, whereby fear-conditioned mice were categorized as extinction (EXT)-success or EXT-failure, according to their inherent ability to extinguish fear. In the lateral amygdala, GluN2A-containing NMDAR are required for LTP and stabilization of fear memories, while GluN2B-containing NMDAR are required for LTD and fear extinction. EXT-success mice showed attenuated LTP, strong LTD and higher levels of synaptic GluN2B, while EXT-failure mice showed strong LTP, no LTD and higher levels of synaptic GluN2A. Neurotrophin 3 (NT3) infusion in the lateral amygdala was sufficient to rescue extinction deficits in EXT-failure mice. Mechanistically, activation of tropomyosin receptor kinase C (TrkC) with NT3 in EXT-failure slices attenuated lateral amygdala LTP, in a GluN2B-dependent manner. Conversely, blocking endogenous NT3-TrkC signaling with TrkC-Fc chimera in EXT-success slices strengthened lateral amygdala LTP. Our data support a key role for the NT3-TrkC system in inter-individual differences in fear extinction in rodents, through modulation of amygdalar NMDAR composition and synaptic plasticity.

Efficacy of Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology in Diagnosing Secretory Carcinoma of Salivary Gland: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The diagnosis of salivary gland secretory carcinoma (SC) in fine-needle aspiration specimens is challenging because its low-grade nature makes it difficult to differentiate it from various benign or malignant salivary gland neoplasms. Currently, the gold standard is demonstration of ETV6-NTRK3 fusion gene. However, the decision for ordering this costly molecular testing can be facilitated by the correct recognition of its cytomorphological features. The aim of the review was to determine the accuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) in diagnosis of salivary gland SC. The secondary objective was to recognize varied cytomorphological patterns, characteristic features of SC and differentiate it from other neoplasms. METHODS: PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Direct, Embase, Cochrane review, and PROSPERO databases were searched for studies having the following key search terms: ("secretory carcinoma of salivary gland" OR "mammary analogue secretory carcinoma of salivary gland") AND ("Cytology" OR "Cytological features" OR "aspirate" OR "cytodiagnosis") published in the time frame of 2010 to June 2023. Studies reporting cytological features of the salivary gland tumors which were confirmed/diagnosed as SC on molecular investigation, were included in the systematic review. Finally, seventeen studies reporting a total of 45 cases were included in the metanalysis. RESULTS: The sensitivity of the FNAC in diagnosing SC in salivary gland is 27.7% (95% CI: 16.6-42.5%). The LR+ (positive likelihood ratio) was 0.654 (0.344-1.245), LR- (negative likelihood ratio) was 1.023 (0.538-1.946), and diagnostic odds ratio was 0.421 (0.129-1.374). The molecular testing and/or immunohistochemistry performed on cell block increased the diagnostic accuracy. CONCLUSION: Recognition of subtle cytomorphological patterns, i.e., papillary formation, clusters, and singly dispersed cells along with presence of fine intracytoplasmic vacuolations were the characteristic findings in majority of cases, confirmed with diagnostic molecular profiling. This may be helpful in identification of this rare entity with limited published literature and help in increasing diagnostic accuracy.

Evaluation of NTRK expression and fusions in a large cohort of early-stage lung cancer.

Tropomyosin receptor kinases (TRK) are attractive targets for cancer therapy. As TRK-inhibitors are approved for all solid cancers with detectable fusions involving the Neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK)-genes, there has been an increased interest in optimizing testing regimes. In this project, we wanted to find the prevalence of NTRK fusions in a cohort of various histopathological types of early-stage lung cancer in Norway and to investigate the association between TRK protein expression and specific histopathological types, including their molecular and epidemiological characteristics. We used immunohistochemistry (IHC) as a screening tool for TRK expression, and next-generation sequencing (NGS) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) as confirmatory tests for underlying NTRK-fusion. Among 940 cases, 43 (4.6%) had positive TRK IHC, but in none of these could a NTRK fusion be confirmed by NGS or FISH. IHC-positive cases showed various staining intensities and patterns including cytoplasmatic or nuclear staining. IHC-positivity was more common in squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) (10.3%) and adenoid cystic carcinoma (40.0%), where the majority showed heterogeneous staining intensity. In comparison, only 1.1% of the adenocarcinomas were positive. IHC-positivity was also more common in men, but this association could be explained by the dominance of LUSC in TRK IHC-positive cases. Protein expression was not associated with differences in time to relapse or overall survival. Our study indicates that NTRK fusion is rare in early-stage lung cancer. Due to the high level of false positive cases with IHC, Pan-TRK IHC is less suited as a screening tool for NTRK-fusions in LUSC and adenoid cystic carcinoma.

Srsf1 and Elavl1 act antagonistically on neuronal fate choice in the developing neocortex by controlling TrkC receptor isoform expression.

The seat of higher-order cognitive abilities in mammals, the neocortex, is a complex structure, organized in several layers. The different subtypes of principal neurons are distributed in precise ratios and at specific positions in these layers and are generated by the same neural progenitor cells (NPCs), steered by a spatially and temporally specified combination of molecular cues that are incompletely understood. Recently, we discovered that an alternatively spliced isoform of the TrkC receptor lacking the kinase domain, TrkC-T1, is a determinant of the corticofugal projection neuron (CFuPN) fate. Here, we show that the finely tuned balance between TrkC-T1 and the better known, kinase domain-containing isoform, TrkC-TK+, is cell type-specific in the developing cortex and established through the antagonistic actions of two RNA-binding proteins, Srsf1 and Elavl1. Moreover, our data show that Srsf1 promotes the CFuPN fate and Elavl1 promotes the callosal projection neuron (CPN) fate in vivo via regulating the distinct ratios of TrkC-T1 to TrkC-TK+. Taken together, we connect spatio-temporal expression of Srsf1 and Elavl1 in the developing neocortex with the regulation of TrkC alternative splicing and transcript stability and neuronal fate choice, thus adding to the mechanistic and functional understanding of alternative splicing in vivo.