Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 1.040
Filter
1.
Ghana Med J ; 58(1): 78-85, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38957285

ABSTRACT

Objective: Infertility remains a global challenge, with assisted reproductive technology (ART) progressively gaining relevance in developing countries, including Ghana. However, associated ethico-legal challenges have not received the needed policy attention. This study explored the legal and ethical challenges of ART practice in Ghana. Design: The study employed an exploratory phenomenological approach to examine ART in Ghana, focusing on ethics and law governing this practice. Participants: Respondents were ART practitioners, managers, facility owners, representatives of surrogacy/gamete donor agencies, and regulatory body representatives. Methods: A semi-structured interview guide was used to collect data.The in-depth interviews were audiotaped, and responses transcribed for analysis through coding, followed by generation of themes and sub-themes, supported with direct quotes. Results: It emerged that there are no ethical and legal frameworks for ART practice in Ghana, and this adversely affects ART practice. Ethical challenges identified border on informed consent, clients' privacy and clinical data protection, gamete donation issues, multiple gestations, single parenting, and social and religious issues. The legal challenges identified include the non-existence of a legal regime for regulating ART practice and the absence of a professional body with clear-cut guidelines on ART practice. In the absence of legal and ethical frameworks in Ghana, practitioners intimated they do comply with internationally accepted principles and general ethics in medical practice. Conclusion: There are no regulations on ART in Ghana. Legal and ethical guidelines are essential to the provision of safe and successful ART practices to protect providers and users. Governmental efforts to regulate Ghana need to be prioritized. Funding: This study had no external funding support. It was funded privately from researchers' contributions.


Subject(s)
Reproductive Techniques, Assisted , Humans , Ghana , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/ethics , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/legislation & jurisprudence , Female , Informed Consent/legislation & jurisprudence , Informed Consent/ethics , Male , Interviews as Topic , Pregnancy , Infertility/therapy , Qualitative Research
2.
J Law Med ; 31(2): 244-257, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38963245

ABSTRACT

This section considers the recent resurgence of regulatory interest in the field of assisted reproductive technology (ART) practices focusing on the new legislative framework in the Australian Capital Territory (ACT). It provides an overview of the Australian regulatory framework in this field and considers how the new legislation in the ACT sits alongside this framework. A detailed overview of the key provisions of the ACT legislation is provided, before considering whether the legislation goes far enough in addressing some of the more controversial issues in the field of ART.


Subject(s)
Reproductive Techniques, Assisted , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Australia , Government Regulation
3.
Reprod Biomed Online ; 49(1): 103970, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38733677

ABSTRACT

Assisted reproductive technology (ART) has emerged in recent years as a point of significant innovation in the medical field but is also controversial from a bioethical and legal standpoint. In the Italian context, this matter is regulated by Law 40/2004, which specifically requires that informed consent should be obtained from both members of a couple before proceeding with any ART procedure. This consent is deemed irrevocable at the moment of egg fertilization. Recently, a ruling by the Italian Constitutional Court on this matter elicited controversy. The decision permitted embryo transfer even in a case of parental separation, notwithstanding the father's explicit opposition. The Court emphasized the priority of the woman's psychophysical health over the man's, highlighting the traumatic consequences of interrupting the undertaken path. As a result, both the man's right to self-determination regarding the decision to become a father and the need for informed consent at every stage of medical procedures have been downplayed. Moreover, the extensive utilization of procedures like embryo cryopreservation, with associated parental implications, particularly concerning the time frame and the actuality of informed consent, is posing challenges to the initial application framework of Law 40/2004. The objective of this Commentary is to scrutinize and discuss the issues mentioned above.


Subject(s)
Fathers , Informed Consent , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted , Humans , Italy , Female , Fathers/legislation & jurisprudence , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/legislation & jurisprudence , Male , Informed Consent/legislation & jurisprudence , Mothers/psychology , Embryo Transfer
4.
Soc Sci Med ; 351: 116951, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38743990

ABSTRACT

Fertility decline is a complex phenomenon resulting from converging social and cultural changes that are governed through politics. As it has been discussed in many studies, the European's low fertility rate goes hand in hand with the trend of maternity postponement. Although in many European countries over the last decades reproduction is envisaged as an individual choice that can be made at older ages, having a child after a certain age can be impossible -either "naturally" or using assisted reproductive technology-depending on the medical and legislative possibilities and limits of the country in which people live. In the extremely diverse European reproscape, reproductive legislations have forced but also allowed many people to seek reproductive treatments outside their home countries. Spain is a leading destination in Europe for cross border reproductive travel and, of the foreigners it receives, the French are the largest group. Despite having a history of strong pro-natalist policies, France has been one of the strictest European countries regarding access to medically assisted procreation. Until 2022, only heterosexual couples in which women were under 43 years of age could access treatments. Despite the recent opening of access to "all women", including single women and same-sex female couples, women over 43 years of age were once again excluded from the new legal framework and therefore remain condemned to travel abroad to access reproductive treatments. In this article, we analyze the experience of French women over 40 who cross the Spanish border to access reproductive treatments in order to fulfill their desire to have children. Through ethnographic data emerging from six years of participant observation and in-depth interviews with 15 women, we explore why they remain excluded from the French system of reproductive governance and the obstacles they face during their reproductive journey.


Subject(s)
Reproductive Techniques, Assisted , Humans , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/statistics & numerical data , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/legislation & jurisprudence , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/trends , Female , Spain , Adult , France , Medical Tourism/trends , Middle Aged , Qualitative Research
5.
Clin Ter ; 175(3): 163-167, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38767073

ABSTRACT

Abstract: The law (No.40/2004) stipulates that consent to Medically Assisted Procreation (MAP) remains irrevocable post ovum fertilization. Cryo-preservation introduces complexities, enabling embryo implantation requests after a couple's separation and the dissolution of the original parenthood plan. Constitutional Court Ruling No.161 in 2023 affirmed that the prohibition of revoking consent to MAP aligns with the Italian Constitution and the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights. This delicate equilibrium of conflicting interests upholds human freedom, allowing consent revocation prior to ovocyte fertilization. Permitting revocation until implantation could inflict more significant harm: the infertile woman can in fact miss the opportunity to become a mother, impacting her psychophysical well-being and freedom of self-determination. Moreover, the embryo loses the chance to live, remaining in cryopreservation, which violates its dignity. Addressing this issue requires thorough communication by medical profession-als to inform couples about the limitations on consent revocation. An element of objectivity in terms of standards and evidence-based guidelines, from which norms must originate, is of utmost importance. Relying on broadly shared rules, especially at the international level, is vital in light of the unremitting scientific advances in MAP, as in other areas of medicine, which will open up new opportunities for which current legal/regulatory frameworks are inadequate.


Subject(s)
Reproductive Techniques, Assisted , Humans , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/legislation & jurisprudence , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/ethics , Italy , Female , Male , Health Services Accessibility/legislation & jurisprudence , Cryopreservation , Parental Consent/legislation & jurisprudence , Informed Consent/legislation & jurisprudence
6.
Indian Pediatr ; 61(7): 675-681, 2024 Jul 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38803100

ABSTRACT

The desire for parenthood among infertile individuals is often fulfilled by resorting to the ever-evolving Assisted Reproductive Techniques (ART). Since the birth of Durga, India's first baby born using ART in 1981, the lucrative fertility industry has grown exponentially in our country. The Government of India passed the Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulatory) Act in 2021 to provide regulatory support to these services. The legislation offers clarity on various aspects of ART, including measures to safeguard children born through these procedures. The effective implementation of the ART Act is crucial to ensure that ART services become affordable, ethical, and socially acceptable in India. This article aims to discuss the controversies with ART services and issues that could compromise the wellbeing of children, while highlighting the provisions provided under the Act to address these.


Subject(s)
Reproductive Techniques, Assisted , Humans , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/legislation & jurisprudence , India , Female , Pregnancy , Child
8.
Acta Med Acad ; 53(1): 81-89, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38629256

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this narrative review paper was to review the state and development of the field of donor gametes in Kazakhstan, compare its legislative and technical capabilities with other countries and identify key steps towards the establishment of a unified register of donor gametes in the Republic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The narrative review paper conducted an analysis of scientific publications and legal documents to examine the implementation of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART), focusing on Donor Sexual Gametes (DSG), globally. It utilized medical publications from 2019 to 2023, legal acts, and recommendations from global health organizations to analyze eligibility criteria, legal regulations, and the social aspects of ART across different regions. RESULTS: In Kazakhstan, ART is regulated by legislation, with DSG procedures governed by age limits, medical screening, and restrictions on the number of children born from donated gametes. Worldwide, practices vary, but there is growing interest in establishing a unified register of reproductive donor material to enhance transparency and accountability. However, legal gaps and ethical considerations must be addressed. CONCLUSION: The study identifies gaps in Kazakhstan's legislation compared to Western countries, emphasizing the necessity for enhanced legal rights for donors and recipients, including options for anonymity. Ethical concerns highlight the importance of confidentiality and data security in accessing the donor registry. Overall, implementing such a register promises to enhance transparency, safety, and accountability in reproductive medicine.


Subject(s)
Registries , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted , Tissue Donors , Kazakhstan , Humans , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/legislation & jurisprudence , Tissue Donors/legislation & jurisprudence , Male , Female , Germ Cells
9.
J Reprod Immunol ; 163: 104247, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38669789

ABSTRACT

This comprehensive review examines the multifaceted landscape of surrogacy, a revolutionary treatment for infertility. The study examines historical origins, shifting trends, medical considerations, psychological implications, legal complexities, international variations, and ethical dilemmas surrounding surrogacy. With the advent of assisted reproductive technology, gestational surrogacy allows intended parents a genetic connection to their child. Medical facets encompass indications for gestational surrogacy, drawing attention to maternal health risks and infertility factors. Evidence indicates that medical outcomes are comparable to conventional pregnancies, suggesting a viable reproductive solution for intended parents. Due to the complex nature of surrogacy psychological and emotional vulnerability is inevitable; yet studies underscore positive psychological well-being and satisfaction among gestational carriers (GCs), intended parents (IPs) and children. Surrogacy also has many religious dimensions, as each religion has its own perspective on the distinctive process of creating life and its outcomes, such as, the determination of the child's mother according to their beliefs. Legal considerations emerge as a fundamental aspect, with differing regulations globally. The review emphasizes the significance of comprehensive agreements to safeguard the rights and responsibilities of surrogates and IPs. The unique surrogacy laws in Israel serve as a noteworthy example, reflecting a progressive approach that provides a promising template to establish crucial international guidelines on surrogacy. The absence of international consensus necessitates attention from the global community to address key concerns, including the well-being of GCs, legal recognition for IPs, and the child's best interests, with the goal of establishing a universal standard of care in the field.


Subject(s)
Reproductive Techniques, Assisted , Surrogate Mothers , Humans , Surrogate Mothers/legislation & jurisprudence , Female , Pregnancy , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/ethics , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/legislation & jurisprudence , Infertility/therapy , Parents/psychology , Israel
11.
Reprod Biomed Online ; 48(5): 103764, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38428344

ABSTRACT

The practice of surrogacy is frequently the subject of media, scientific, social, regulatory and policy attention. Although it is, for many, an accepted form of assisted reproduction for those who would otherwise not be able to have children, surrogacy often generates strong feeling, particularly where there is any possibility of exploitation. Therefore, there is disagreement about how it should be regulated. In some countries, surrogacy is prohibited in any form, although this does not stop people using it. In others, it is unregulated but still practised. In some nations it is regulated in either a 'commercial' or an 'altruistic' model. This review article considers the possible regulatory future of surrogacy, initially from a UK perspective considering a recent review of the legal framework in a country where surrogacy works well (although some cross borders to access it), and then through an assessment of global trends and other national perspectives. It concludes that the international regulation of surrogacy, although potentially desirable, is unlikely. This being the case, it would be preferable for individual nations to regulate surrogacy so it can be undertaken in ways that are safe, ethical and protective of the best interests of children, surrogates, intended parents and families.


Subject(s)
Reproductive Techniques, Assisted , Surrogate Mothers , Surrogate Mothers/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/trends , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/legislation & jurisprudence , United Kingdom
12.
JBRA Assist Reprod ; 28(2): 349-352, 2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38530764

ABSTRACT

This comprehensive review delves into the moral and ethical dilemmas surrounding post-mortem sperm retrieval (PMSR) and its implications for creating new individuals. The paper examines the challenges posed by unusual requests for sperm retrieval from the deceased's widow and parents, as well as the broader socio-ethical considerations associated with PMSR. These requests have often been denied due to the absence of established laws and guidelines governing posthumous sperm retrieval and subsequent births, which were once deemed impossible. While some countries have implemented institutional policies to regulate its use to some extent, there remains a lack of standardized rules and procedures for the collection and retrieval of sperm after death. It is essential to introduce institutional guidelines to facilitate requests for assisted reproductive technology (ART) following successful sperm retrieval. Additionally, the development of PMSR legislation is necessary to ensure a proper balance between the moral rights and fundamental rights of the deceased, their family, and any current or future offspring, while providing adequate protection for all parties involved.


Subject(s)
Sperm Retrieval , Humans , Male , Sperm Retrieval/ethics , Sperm Retrieval/legislation & jurisprudence , Posthumous Conception/ethics , Posthumous Conception/legislation & jurisprudence , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/ethics , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/legislation & jurisprudence
15.
BJOG ; 129(4): 590-596, 2022 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34532958

ABSTRACT

Uterus transplantation (UTx) is fast evolving from an experimental to a clinical procedure, combining solid organ transplantation with assisted reproductive technology. The commencement of the first human uterus transplant trial in the United Kingdom leads us to examine and reflect upon the legal and regulatory aspects closely intertwined with UTx from the process of donation to potential implications for fertility treatment and the birth of the resultant child. As the world's first ephemeral transplant, the possibility of organ restitution requires consideration and is discussed herein. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Uterine transplantation warrants a closer look at the legal frameworks on fertility treatment and transplantation in England.


Subject(s)
Organ Transplantation/legislation & jurisprudence , Uterus/transplantation , England , Female , Humans , Hysterectomy/legislation & jurisprudence , Hysterectomy/psychology , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/legislation & jurisprudence , Tissue and Organ Procurement/legislation & jurisprudence
17.
Femina ; 50(5): 296-300, 2022.
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-1380708

ABSTRACT

O Conselho Federal de Medicina acaba de editar a Resolução nº 2.294/2021, publicada em 15 de junho de 2021, que aponta normas para a utilização das técnicas de reprodução assistida. Apesar de o propósito ser o aperfeiçoamento das práticas e a observância aos princípios éticos e bioéticos para trazer maior segurança e eficácia a tratamentos e procedimentos médicos, repete inconstitucionalidades das normatizações pretéritas e impõe mais restrições ao sonho das pessoas de ter filhos. Desse modo, mais do que avanços, o novo regramento provoca um retrocesso que não se coaduna com a garantia constitucional e legal que assegura o livre planejamento familiar.(AU)


The Brazilian Federal Council of Medicine has just edited the Resolution nº 2.294/2021, published on June 15, 2021, which sets out rules for the use of assisted reproduction techniques. Although the purpose is to improve practices and observe ethical and bioethical principles to bring greater safety and efficacy to medical treatments and procedures, it repeats the unconstitutionalities of past regulations and imposes more restrictions on people's dreams of having children. In this way, more than advances, the new regulation provokes a setback that is not consistent with the constitutional and legal guarantees of free family planning.(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Pregnancy , Professional Review Organizations/legislation & jurisprudence , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/legislation & jurisprudence , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/ethics , Brazil , Constitution and Bylaws , Resolutions/legislation & jurisprudence , Reproductive Rights , Family Development Planning
18.
Reprod Biomed Online ; 43(3): 421-433, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34344602

ABSTRACT

Infertility is a medico-socio-cultural problem associated with gender-based suffering. Infertility treatment, including assisted reproductive technology (ART), is a human right. Culture and religion were among the stumbling blocks to early acceptance of ART, particularly in the Middle East and to a lesser extent in Europe. This was mostly due to the different cultural and religious perspectives on the moral status of the embryo in the two regions and the concerns about what could be done with human embryos in the laboratory. There is an increased demand for ART in both the Middle East and Europe, although the reasons for this increased demand are not always the same. Although Europe leads the world in ART, there is an unmet need for ART in many countries in the Middle East. Where ART is not supported by governments or insurance companies, a large percentage of couples paying for ART themselves will stop before they succeed in having a baby. There are similarities and differences in ART practices in the two regions. If a healthcare provider has a conscientious objection to a certain ART modality, he/she is ethically obliged to refer the patient to where they could have it done, provided it is legal.


Subject(s)
Culture , Infertility/therapy , Religion and Medicine , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted , Europe/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infertility/epidemiology , Infertility/psychology , Male , Middle East/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Religion , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/legislation & jurisprudence , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/psychology , Social Stigma
19.
Reprod Biomed Online ; 43(3): 571-576, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34332903

ABSTRACT

Access to assisted reproductive technology (ART) and fertility preservation remains restricted in middle and low income countries. We sought to review the status of ART and fertility preservation in Brazil, considering social indicators and legislative issues that may hinder the universal access to these services. Although the Brazilian Constitution expressly provides the right to health, and ordinary law ensures the state is obliged to support family planning, access to services related to ART and fertility preservation is neither easy nor egalitarian in Brazil. Only a handful of public hospitals provide free ART, and their capacity far from meets demand. Health insurance does not cover ART, and the cost of private care is unaffordable to most people. Brazilian law supports, but does not command, the state provision of ART and fertility preservation to guarantee the right to family planning; therefore, the availability of state-funded treatments is still scarce, reinforcing social disparities. Economic projections suggest that including ART in the Brazilian health system is affordable and may actually become profitable to the state in the long term, not to mention the ethical imperative of recognizing infertility as a disease, with no reason to be excluded from a health system that claims to be 'universal'.


Subject(s)
Fertility Preservation , Health Services Accessibility , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted , Brazil , Family Planning Services/economics , Family Planning Services/ethics , Family Planning Services/legislation & jurisprudence , Female , Fertility Preservation/ethics , Fertility Preservation/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Services Accessibility/ethics , Health Services Accessibility/legislation & jurisprudence , Healthcare Disparities/ethics , Healthcare Disparities/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infertility/economics , Infertility/epidemiology , Infertility/therapy , Male , Pregnancy , Reproductive Rights/ethics , Reproductive Rights/legislation & jurisprudence , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/economics , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/ethics , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/legislation & jurisprudence
20.
Clin Ter ; 172(4): 253-255, 2021 Jul 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34247204

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: Law No 40/2004 regulates in Italy the matter of medically assisted procreation (MAP). Recently, the Tribunal of Capua Vetere expressed its position on the subject of informed consent in a case of MAP. In the specific case, a couple entered the preliminary stages of the PMA procedures, carrying out the fertilization of the ovum and the embryo production. Afterwards, the couple separated and the man denied consent to the continuation of the MAP. The woman, willing to proceed with the implantation, the woman made an urgent judicial appeal, obtaining the judge's permission to transfer the embryo to the uterus. This paper analyses the different bioethical positions on MAP's informed consent. In fact, on the one hand, the paper highlight what is set out in Law 219/2017 which provides for the possibility of the patient to revoke at any time the consent to the treatment given. On the other hand, it should be noted that Law 40/2004, willing to protect the embryo, establishes the irrevocability of the position of parental consent after fertilization. The judgment in question seems to favour this latter position, placing itself in the protection of the cryopreserved embryo and recall-ing the principle of entrustment following the fertilization of the egg. Nevertheless, the matter is controversial a consistent amount of legal developments are expected to arise in the next future.


Subject(s)
Embryo Implantation , Informed Consent/ethics , Informed Consent/legislation & jurisprudence , Informed Consent/standards , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/ethics , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/legislation & jurisprudence , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/standards , Adult , Divorce/legislation & jurisprudence , Embryo, Mammalian , Female , Humans , Italy , Male , Parents
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...