Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 720
Filter
1.
J Assist Reprod Genet ; 41(9): 2227-2235, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39093321

ABSTRACT

Physician infertility has become a growing concern because of the increasingly high rates of infertility physicians experience associated with their strenuous work schedules, environmental exposures, and delayed family planning due to their necessitated years of training. Fortunately, there has been an increase in awareness, advocacy, and urgency for institutional support alongside this suboptimal association. This awareness is reflected in the vast existing literature regarding physician infertility; in this scoping review, we aggregated and assessed the current data as well as identified gaps in the available research. Including 56 articles regarding various aspects of the current state of physician infertility, we compiled and synthesized the available data to understand the role of infertility in physician family planning, including specific analyses for surgeons and comparisons of male and female physicians. We discussed the utilization and downsides of artificial reproductive technologies for this population in terms of finances and logistics, contributing to this complex and, until recently, neglected issue. Lastly, we reported on a multitude of suggestions aimed at medical training programs to help combat the complex issue of physician infertility.


Subject(s)
Infertility , Physicians , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted , Humans , Infertility/therapy , Female , Male , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/trends , Family Planning Services
2.
J Assist Reprod Genet ; 41(7): 1755-1761, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38958870

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The continuous advancement of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) and the evolving attitudes towards marriage and fertility among the general public have led to an increasing number of groups requiring special attention (GRSA) desiring to fulfill their reproductive needs through these technologies. These groups include single women (including single mothers without children), same-sex couples, and women in high-risk occupations, among others. The purpose of this paper is to explore the feasibility of appropriately liberalizing ART for GRSA. METHODS: This paper discusses the advantages of a moderate liberalization of ART for GRSA from two perspectives: a theoretical basis and a practical significance level. It also analyzes the current constraints on liberalizing ART and presents suggestions for moderate liberalization. RESULTS: The moderate liberalization of ART can provide technical support for respecting and realizing the reproductive freedom of GRSA, which has certain theoretical and practical significance. However, it is also subject to constraints. CONCLUSION: We call for government to keep pace with the times, based on the current stage of political, economic, and social development, to further recognize and protect citizens' reproductive rights, prioritize the practical needs of the public, and explore policies and regulations for gradually loosening the restrictions on ART for GRSA.


Subject(s)
Reproductive Techniques, Assisted , Humans , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/trends , China , Female , Male , Reproductive Rights , Fertility , Marriage
4.
J Assist Reprod Genet ; 41(9): 2301-2310, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39085741

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Multifetal gestation (MFG) is much more common in pregnancies that utilize assisted reproductive technologies (ART). We assessed how these rates have changed over the previous decade and the impact on live birth rates (LBR). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study uses the National Summary Reports of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) from 2014 to 2020. Data points included only autologous cycles. The data were divided into five age groups as reported in the database: < 35, 35-37, 38-40, 41-42, and > 42 years old. Descriptive statistics and a two-tailed T-test were used to determine the trends and statistical significance (p < 0.05). RESULTS: Rates of twin births decreased substantially from 2014 to 2020 for autologous embryo transfers across all age groups and diagnoses. Surprisingly, the overall LBR for autologous IVF cycles decreased at similar rates from 2014 to 2020 in all age groups. The mean number of embryos transferred has dramatically reduced, especially across age groups < 42. CONCLUSION: Rates of twin and higher-level gestations have decreased substantially over the past decade; the effect correlates with the increased utilization of eSET and PGT. The cause of infertility did not significantly impact the rate of MFG.


Subject(s)
Embryo Transfer , Fertilization in Vitro , Pregnancy, Multiple , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/trends , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Pregnancy, Multiple/statistics & numerical data , Embryo Transfer/methods , Embryo Transfer/trends , Fertilization in Vitro/trends , Retrospective Studies , Birth Rate/trends , Live Birth/epidemiology , Pregnancy Rate , Pregnancy, Twin/statistics & numerical data
5.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 300: 63-68, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38996806

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relative impact of different strategies of medically assisted reproduction (MAR), i.e. first line treatment (ovarian stimulation with or without intrauterine insemination) and in vitro fertilization (IVF) procedures (conventional IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection), on the risk of multiple births. STUDY DESIGN: We utilized the health care utilization databases of the Lombardy region to identify births resulting from MAR between 2007 and 2022. We gathered data on the total number of multiple births and calculated the prevalence rate by dividing the number of multiples by the total number of births. To examine the temporal trend in the proportion of multiple births after MAR over time, a linear regression model was employed separately for different types of techniques and in strata of maternal age. RESULTS: A total of 30,900 births after MAR were included; 4485 (14.5 %) first line treatments and 26,415 (85.5 %) IVF techniques. Overall, 4823 (15.6 %) multiple births were identified. The frequency of multiple births over the study period decreased from 22.0 % in 2007 to 8.7 % in 2022 (p < 0.01). Multiple births from first line treatments were stable ranging from 13.5 % in 2007-2008 to 12.0 % in 2021-2022 (p = 0.29). Multiple births from IVF procedures decreased from 23.8 % in 2007-2008 to 8.4 % in 2021-2022 (p < 0.01). Stratifying for maternal age (i.e. < 35 and ≥ 35 years), the trends remained consistent. CONCLUSIONS: The reduction in multiple births has been influenced by changes in IVF strategy and procedures. The decline has been gradual but steady since 2009, when a law restricting embryo freezing was repealed in Italy. In contrast, the proportion of multiple births resulting from first line treatments has remained constant over time. Despite declining, multiple births from MAR remained about one order of magnitude higher than those from spontaneous pregnancies.


Subject(s)
Fertilization in Vitro , Multiple Birth Offspring , Pregnancy, Multiple , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Adult , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/trends , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/statistics & numerical data , Multiple Birth Offspring/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy, Multiple/statistics & numerical data , Italy/epidemiology , Fertilization in Vitro/statistics & numerical data , Fertilization in Vitro/trends , Maternal Age , Ovulation Induction/statistics & numerical data
6.
Reprod Biol Endocrinol ; 22(1): 67, 2024 Jun 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38877490

ABSTRACT

This comprehensive review explores the evolving landscape of sperm selection techniques within the realm of Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART). Our analysis delves into a range of methods from traditional approaches like density gradient centrifugation to advanced techniques such as Magnetic-Activated Cell Sorting (MACS) and Intracytoplasmic Morphologically Selected Sperm Injection (IMSI). We critically assess the efficacy of these methods in terms of sperm motility, morphology, DNA integrity, and other functional attributes, providing a detailed comparison of their clinical outcomes. We highlight the transition from conventional sperm selection methods, which primarily focus on physical characteristics, to more sophisticated techniques that offer a comprehensive evaluation of sperm molecular properties. This shift not only promises enhanced prediction of fertilization success but also has significant implications for improving embryo quality and increasing the chances of live birth. By synthesizing various studies and research papers, we present an in-depth analysis of the predictability of different sperm selection procedures in ART. The review also discusses the clinical applicability of these methods, emphasizing their potential in shaping the future of assisted reproduction. Our findings suggest that the integration of advanced sperm selection strategies in ART could lead to more cost-effective treatments with reduced duration and higher success rates. This review aims to provide clinicians and researchers in reproductive medicine with comprehensive insights into the current state and future prospects of sperm selection technologies in ART.


Subject(s)
Reproductive Techniques, Assisted , Spermatozoa , Male , Humans , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/trends , Spermatozoa/physiology , Female , Pregnancy , Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic/methods , Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic/trends , Sperm Motility/physiology , Cell Separation/methods
8.
J Assist Reprod Genet ; 41(7): 1821-1824, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38839697

ABSTRACT

Over the past decade, significant endeavors have been directed toward establishing an optimal oocyte number to maximize the chances for successful in vitro fertilization outcomes. The effectiveness of assisted reproductive technologies has greatly improved, and more good-quality embryos are being created in each cycle. However, many of these embryos remain unused. Notably, in Europe, approximately one-third of couples did not use their surplus cryopreserved embryos. Surplus embryos pose a challenge for patients and clinics. Embryo disposal practices are not the same all over the continent, with embryo donation and embryo discharge not allowed in several countries. In this scenario, limiting the number of surplus embryos by reducing the number of inseminated oocytes, according to couple clinical history, could be a strategy.


Subject(s)
Cryopreservation , Embryo Transfer , Fertilization in Vitro , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Embryo Disposition/ethics , Embryo Transfer/methods , Embryo, Mammalian , Fertilization in Vitro/methods , Oocytes/growth & development , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/trends
9.
J Pediatr ; 273: 114146, 2024 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38878961

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of the Assisted Reproduction Act, implemented in 2007 in Taiwan to reduce the number of embryos to transfer, on the trends over time regarding the rate of multiple births, preterm delivery, low birth weight (LBW), and small for gestational age (SGA) among deliveries using assisted reproductive technology (ART). STUDY DESIGN: From the Birth Reporting Registry and the Assisted Reproduction Registry, we retrieved data of 4 016 530 live birth deliveries between 2001 and 2020; among them 71 000 (1.77%) were after ART. We calculated the rate of multiples and perinatal outcomes per 1000 deliveries annually from 2001 to 2020 for deliveries using and not using ART and computed the population attributable risk. We performed interrupted time series to assess the effect of the intervention, ie, the Assisted Reproduction Act. RESULTS: The proportion of deliveries following ART was 0.57% in 2001 and increased to 4.03% in 2020. After the intervention, there were decreasing trends over time for rates of multiples (-10.63 per year, P < .001), preterm delivery (-6.74, P = .003), LBW (-9.38, P < .001), and SGA (-4.48, P = .001) among ART deliveries. There was also an immediate decrease right after intervention (-53.45, P = .005) for SGA after ART. The population attributable risk trends before and after intervention were both increasing for all outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The Assisted Reproduction Act in Taiwan was associated with a decreasing trend of multiples, preterm delivery, LBW, and SGA over time since 2008 among ART deliveries. In particular, there was an immediate decrease of SGA right after the intervention.


Subject(s)
Infant, Low Birth Weight , Infant, Small for Gestational Age , Pregnancy Outcome , Premature Birth , Registries , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted , Humans , Taiwan/epidemiology , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/trends , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/statistics & numerical data , Female , Pregnancy , Infant, Newborn , Premature Birth/epidemiology , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology , Pregnancy, Multiple/statistics & numerical data , Multiple Birth Offspring/statistics & numerical data , Adult
10.
Obstet Gynecol ; 143(6): 839-848, 2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38696814

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of demographic shifts, changes in contemporaneous clinical practices, and technologic innovation on assisted reproductive technology (ART) success rates by conducting an analysis of cumulative live-birth rates across different time periods, age groups, and infertility diagnoses. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of autologous linked cycles comparing cumulative live-birth rates over successive cycles from patients undergoing their first retrieval between 2014 and 2019 in the SART CORS (Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System) database. All cycles reported for these individuals up to 2020 were included for analysis. We compared cumulative live-birth rates stratified by age and infertility cause with published data from the 2004-2009 SART CORS database. RESULTS: From 2014 to 2019, 447,042 patients underwent their first autologous index retrieval, resulting in 1,007,374 cycles and 252,215 live births over the period of 2014 to 2020. In contrast, between 2004 and 2008, 246,740 patients underwent 471,208 cycles, resulting in 140,859 births by 2009. Noteworthy shifts in demographics were observed, with an increase in people of color seeking reproductive technology (57.9% vs 51.7%, P <.001). There was also an increase in patients with diminished ovarian reserve and ovulatory disorders and a decrease in endometriosis, tubal, and male factor infertility ( P <.001). Previously associated with decreased odds of live birth, frozen embryo transfer and preimplantation genetic testing showed increased odds in 2014-2020. Preimplantation genetic testing rose from 3.4% to 36.0% and was associated with a lower cumulative live-birth rate for those younger than age 35 years ( P <.001) but a higher cumulative live-birth rate for those aged 35 years or older ( P <.001). Comparing 2014-2020 with 2004-2009 shows that the overall cumulative live-birth rate improved for patients aged 35 years or older and for all infertility diagnoses except ovulatory disorders ( P <.001). CONCLUSION: This analysis provides insights into the changing landscape of ART treatments in the United States over the past two decades. The observed shifts in demographics, clinical practices, and technology highlight the dynamic nature of an evolving field of reproductive medicine. These findings may offer insight for clinicians to consider in counseling patients and to inform future research endeavors in the field of ART.


Subject(s)
Live Birth , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted , Humans , Female , Adult , Retrospective Studies , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/statistics & numerical data , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/trends , United States/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Live Birth/epidemiology , Infertility/therapy , Infertility/epidemiology , Male , Birth Rate/trends
11.
Soc Sci Med ; 351: 116951, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38743990

ABSTRACT

Fertility decline is a complex phenomenon resulting from converging social and cultural changes that are governed through politics. As it has been discussed in many studies, the European's low fertility rate goes hand in hand with the trend of maternity postponement. Although in many European countries over the last decades reproduction is envisaged as an individual choice that can be made at older ages, having a child after a certain age can be impossible -either "naturally" or using assisted reproductive technology-depending on the medical and legislative possibilities and limits of the country in which people live. In the extremely diverse European reproscape, reproductive legislations have forced but also allowed many people to seek reproductive treatments outside their home countries. Spain is a leading destination in Europe for cross border reproductive travel and, of the foreigners it receives, the French are the largest group. Despite having a history of strong pro-natalist policies, France has been one of the strictest European countries regarding access to medically assisted procreation. Until 2022, only heterosexual couples in which women were under 43 years of age could access treatments. Despite the recent opening of access to "all women", including single women and same-sex female couples, women over 43 years of age were once again excluded from the new legal framework and therefore remain condemned to travel abroad to access reproductive treatments. In this article, we analyze the experience of French women over 40 who cross the Spanish border to access reproductive treatments in order to fulfill their desire to have children. Through ethnographic data emerging from six years of participant observation and in-depth interviews with 15 women, we explore why they remain excluded from the French system of reproductive governance and the obstacles they face during their reproductive journey.


Subject(s)
Reproductive Techniques, Assisted , Humans , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/statistics & numerical data , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/legislation & jurisprudence , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/trends , Female , Spain , Adult , France , Medical Tourism/trends , Middle Aged , Qualitative Research
13.
Reprod Biomed Online ; 48(5): 103764, 2024 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38428344

ABSTRACT

The practice of surrogacy is frequently the subject of media, scientific, social, regulatory and policy attention. Although it is, for many, an accepted form of assisted reproduction for those who would otherwise not be able to have children, surrogacy often generates strong feeling, particularly where there is any possibility of exploitation. Therefore, there is disagreement about how it should be regulated. In some countries, surrogacy is prohibited in any form, although this does not stop people using it. In others, it is unregulated but still practised. In some nations it is regulated in either a 'commercial' or an 'altruistic' model. This review article considers the possible regulatory future of surrogacy, initially from a UK perspective considering a recent review of the legal framework in a country where surrogacy works well (although some cross borders to access it), and then through an assessment of global trends and other national perspectives. It concludes that the international regulation of surrogacy, although potentially desirable, is unlikely. This being the case, it would be preferable for individual nations to regulate surrogacy so it can be undertaken in ways that are safe, ethical and protective of the best interests of children, surrogates, intended parents and families.


Subject(s)
Reproductive Techniques, Assisted , Surrogate Mothers , Surrogate Mothers/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/trends , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/legislation & jurisprudence , United Kingdom
14.
JAMA ; 330(17): 1691-1694, 2023 11 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37851614

ABSTRACT

This study used national surveillance data from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology to describe trends and outcomes in assisted reproductive technology cycles using a gestational carrier vs those not using a gestational carrier.


Subject(s)
Pregnancy Outcome , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted , Surrogate Mothers , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Fertilization in Vitro , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/statistics & numerical data , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/trends , Retrospective Studies , Surrogate Mothers/statistics & numerical data
15.
Fertil Steril ; 117(3): 469-476, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35219471

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this review is to educate the reader on the role that cryopreservation has played and continues to play in the ever-evolving field of assisted reproductive technologies, specifically in clinical human fertility treatment. We discuss the science behind the cryopreservation methods and investigated some of the major considerations that any clinic or cryobank faces in terms of risks and liabilities, physical challenges that accompany the constantly growing collection of cryopreserved specimens, and what this means on the ethical and legal front. Finally, we take a glimpse in the future to explore what may be on the horizon for the preservation of gametes and reproductive tissues.


Subject(s)
Cryopreservation/methods , Fertility Preservation/methods , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted , Cryopreservation/trends , Fertility Preservation/trends , Germ Cells/physiology , Germ Cells/transplantation , Humans , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/trends , Vitrification
17.
Fertil Steril ; 117(3): 593-602, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35058044

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate hospitalizations up to 8 years after live birth among women who used assisted reproductive technology (ART) or who were subfertile compared with women who conceived naturally. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Deliveries among privately insured women aged ≥18 years between 2004 and 2017 from Massachusetts state vital records were linked to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System and hospital observational/inpatient stays. PATIENT(S): We compared patients with ART, medically assisted reproduction (MAR), and unassisted subfertile (USF) delivery with those with fertile delivery. INTERVENTION(S): NA. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Postdelivery hospitalization information was derived from the International Classification of Diseases codes for discharges and combined by type. The relative risks and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of hospitalization for up to the first 8 years postdelivery were modeled. RESULT(S): Among 492,515 deliveries, 5.6% used ART, 1.6% used MAR, and 1.8% were USF. Compared with fertile deliveries, deliveries that used ART or MAR or were USF were more likely to have hospital utilization (inpatient or observational stay) for any reason for up to 8 years of follow-up (USF, adjusted relative risk [aRR], 1.18 [95% CI, 1.12-1.25]; MAR, aRR, 1.20 [1.13-1.27]; and ART, aRR, 1.29 [1.25-1.34]). Assisted reproductive technology deliveries had an increased risk of hospitalization for conditions of the cardiovascular system (aRR, 1.31 [95% CI, 1.20-1.41]), overweight/obesity (aRR, 1.30 [1.17-1.44]), diabetes (aRR, 1.25 [1.05-1.49]), reproductive tract (aRR, 1.62 [1.47-1.79]), digestive tract (aRR, 1.39 [1.30-1.49]), thyroid (aRR, 2.02 [1.80-2.26]), respiratory system (aRR, 1.13 [1.03-1.24]), and cancer (aRR, 1.40 [1.18-1.65]) up to 8 years after delivery. Deliveries with MAR and subfertility had similar patterns of hospitalization as ART deliveries. CONCLUSION(S): Women who conceived through fertility treatment or experienced subfertility were at increased risk of subsequent hospitalization resulting from a variety of chronic and acute conditions.


Subject(s)
Delivery, Obstetric/trends , Hospitalization/trends , Infertility, Female/epidemiology , Infertility, Female/therapy , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/trends , Adult , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Massachusetts/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies
18.
J Assist Reprod Genet ; 39(1): 19-36, 2022 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35034216

ABSTRACT

Although medical advancements have successfully helped a lot of couples with their infertility by assisted reproductive technologies (ART), sperm selection, a crucial stage in ART, has remained challenging. Therefore, we aimed to investigate novel sperm separation methods, specifically microfluidic systems, as they do sperm selection based on sperm and/or the female reproductive tract (FRT) features without inflicting any damage to the selected sperm during the process. In this review, after an exhaustive studying of FRT features, which can implement by microfluidics devices, the focus was centered on sperm selection and investigation devices. During this study, we tried not to only point to the deficiencies of these systems, but to put forth suggestions for their improvement as well.


Subject(s)
Genitalia, Female/physiology , Sperm Count/instrumentation , Spermatozoa/cytology , Adult , Female , Genitalia, Female/microbiology , Humans , Male , Microfluidics/instrumentation , Microfluidics/methods , Microfluidics/statistics & numerical data , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/standards , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/trends , Sperm Count/methods , Sperm Count/trends , Spermatozoa/microbiology
19.
Fertil Steril ; 117(1): 42-50, 2022 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34674830

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate similarities and differences in clinical and laboratory practices among high-performing fertility clinics. DESIGN: Cross-sectional questionnaire study of selected programs. SETTING: Academic and private fertility practices performing in vitro fertilization (IVF). PATIENT(S): Not applicable. INTERVENTION(S): A comprehensive survey was conducted of 13 IVF programs performing at least 100 cycles a year and having high cumulative singleton delivery rates for 2 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Clinical and laboratory IVF practices. RESULT(S): Although many areas of clinical practice varied among top programs, some commonalities were observed. All programs used a combination of follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone for IVF stimulation, intramuscular progesterone in frozen embryo transfer cycles, ultrasound-guided embryo transfers, and a required semen analysis before starting the IVF cycle. Common laboratory practices included vitrification of embryos at the blastocyst stage, air quality control with positive air pressure and high-efficiency particulate air filtration, use of incubator gas filters, working on heated microscope stages, and incubating embryos in a low-oxygen environment, most often in benchtop incubators. CONCLUSION(S): Some areas of consistency in clinical and laboratory practices were noted among high-performing IVF programs that are likely contributing to their success. High-performing programs focused on singleton deliveries. As the field of IVF is rapidly evolving, it is imperative that we share best practices in an effort to improve outcomes from all clinics for the good of our patients.


Subject(s)
Fertilization in Vitro , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy Rate , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Fertilization in Vitro/history , Fertilization in Vitro/statistics & numerical data , Fertilization in Vitro/trends , History, 21st Century , Humans , Infertility/epidemiology , Infertility/therapy , Male , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/trends , Pregnancy , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/history , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/trends , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , United States/epidemiology
20.
Fertil Steril ; 117(1): 53-63, 2022 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34815068

ABSTRACT

This committee opinion provides practitioners with suggestions for optimizing the likelihood of achieving pregnancy in couples or individuals attempting conception who have no evidence of infertility. This document replaces the document of the same name previously published in 2013 (Fertil Steril 2013;100:631-7).


Subject(s)
Directive Counseling/standards , Fertility/physiology , Infertility/therapy , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted , Adult , Directive Counseling/methods , Endocrinologists/organization & administration , Endocrinologists/standards , Feeding Behavior/physiology , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Male , Pregnancy , Reproductive Medicine/organization & administration , Reproductive Medicine/standards , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/standards , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/trends , Risk Reduction Behavior , Societies, Medical/organization & administration , Societies, Medical/standards , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL