Reducing Failed Extubations in Preterm Infants Via Standardization and Real-Time Decision Support.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Failed extubations are associated with pulmonary morbidity in hospitalized premature newborns. The objective of this study was to use quality improvement methodology to reduce failed extubations through practice standardization and integrating a real-time extubation success calculator into the electronic medical record (EMR). METHODS: A specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound aim was developed to reduce failed extubations (defined as reintubation <5 days from primary extubation) by 50% among infants <32 weeks' gestational age (GA) or <1500 g birth weight by December 31, 2022. Plan-do-study-act cycles were developed to standardize postextubation respiratory support and integrate the EMR-based calculator. Outcome measures included extubation failure rates. Balancing measures included days on mechanical ventilation and number of patients intubated <3 days. Process measures were followed for guideline compliance. Statistical process control charts were used to track time-ordered data and detect special cause variation. RESULTS: We observed a reduction in failed extubations from 10.3% to 2.3%, with special cause variation noted after both plan-do-study-act cycle #1 and #2. Special cause variation was detected in both GA subgroups: <28 weeks' GA (22.0%-8.6%) and ≥28 weeks' GA (4.6%-0.3%). Additionally, the average number of infants intubated <3 days increased (60.2%-73.6%), whereas average ventilator days decreased (10.8-7.0). Finally, the time from infants' extubation score reaching threshold (≥60%) to extubation decreased (14.1-6.4 days) after launching the EMR-integrated calculator. CONCLUSIONS: Practice standardization and implementation of an EMR-based real-time clinical decision support tool improved extubation success, promoted earlier extubation, and reduced ventilator days in premature newborns.

Effects of sitting position on ventilation distribution determined by electrical impedance tomography in ventilated ARDS patients.

OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to evaluate the improvements in pulmonary ventilation following a sitting position in ventilated ARDS patients using electrical impedance tomography. METHODOLOGY: A total of 17 patients with ARDS under mechanical ventilation participated in this study, including 8 with moderate ARDS and 9 with severe ARDS. Each patient was initially placed in the supine position (S1), transitioned to sitting position (SP) for 30 min, and then returned to the supine position (S2). Patients were monitored for each period, with parameters recorded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome included the spatial distribution parameters of EIT, regional of interest (ROI), end-expiratory lung impedance (ΔEELI), and parameters of respiratory mechanics. RESULTS: Compared to S1, the SP significantly altered the distribution in ROI1 (11.29 ± 4.70 vs 14.88 ± 5.00 %, p = 0.003) and ROI2 (35.59 ± 8.99 vs 44.65 ± 6.97 %, p ＜ 0.001), showing reductions, while ROI3 (39.71 ± 11.49 vs 33.06 ± 6.34 %, p = 0.009), ROI4 (13.35 ± 8.76 vs 7.24 ± 5.23 %, p ＜ 0.001), along with peak inspiratory pressure (29.24 ± 3.96 vs 27.71 ± 4.00 cmH2O, p = 0.036), showed increases. ΔEELI decreased significantly ventrally (168.3 (40.33 - 189.5), p ＜ 0.0001) and increased significantly dorsally (461.7 (297.5 - 683.7), p ＜ 0.0001). The PaO2/FiO2 ratio saw significant improvement in S2 compared to S1 after 30 min in the seated position (108 (73 - 130) vs 96 (57 - 129) mmHg, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: The sitting position is associated with enhanced compliance, improved oxygenation, and more homogenous ventilation in patients with ventilated ARDS compared to the supine position. IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE: It is important to know the impact of postural changes on patient pulmonary ventilation in order to standardize safe practices in critically ill patients. It may be helpful in the management among ventilated patients.

Impact of En Route Critical Care Provider Experience on Lung Protective Ventilation Compliance During Air Transport of Combat Wounded.

INTRODUCTION: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the association between the U.S. Air Force Critical Care Air Transport (CCAT) provider operational experience with compliance for lung protective ventilation (LPV) volumes recommended by Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Clinical Network guidelines. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of CCAT providers transporting combat casualties requiring mechanical ventilation from the Middle East to Germany from 2007 to 2012. We reviewed CCAT medical records from 2007 to 2012 for the total number of patient transports by CCAT physicians and respiratory care practitioners (RCPs). Center for Sustainment of Trauma and Readiness Skills Cincinnati process improvement questionnaire data described provider demographics and clinical backgrounds. We linked these data to patient demographics and in-flight ventilation management from a prior CCAT cohort study. Patient inclusion criteria included transport by CCAT from the Middle East to Germany for traumatic injury requiring mechanical ventilation between 2007 and 2012. We excluded patients with no documented height or tidal volume. LPV compliance was defined as tidal volumes ≤8 mL/kg of predicted body weight during en route critical care transport. We performed a logistic regression analysis. This study was reviewed and approved by the 59th Medical Wing institutional review board (IRB). RESULTS: We analyzed 491 patient transports conducted by 71 (RCPs and 84 physicians. Patients had a median age of 25 years (IQR 22-30), 98% were male, median injury severity score was 24 (IQR 17-34), and median preflight PaO2/FiO2 was 285 (IQR 220-365). Median experience was 26 missions (IQR 13-40) for RCPs and 23 missions (IQR 12-38) for physicians. All in-flight tidal volumes were LPV compliant in 58.3% of missions. Unadjusted analysis showed higher LPV compliance for RCPs with in-garrison critical care experience. Multivariate models did not find an association between missions flown and LPV compliance but did demonstrate a positive association with physician specialty of medical intensivist (OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.6-5.7) and a negative association with flights in 2008 (OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.7) for LPV compliance. CONCLUSION: No association was found between number of missions flown by CCAT providers and lung protective tidal volume compliance. Linkage of multiple data sources enabled investigation of clinical and operational currency associations with a care quality metric compliance in the combat en route care environment. Future studies should evaluate the impact of ongoing CCAT training and quality improvement interventions on LPV compliance.

Are instructors correctly gauging ventilation competence acquired by course attendees?

Achievement of adequate ventilation skills during training courses is mainly based on instructors' perception of attendees' capability to ventilate with correct rate and chest compression:ventilation ratio, while leading to chest raising, as evidence of adequate tidal volume. Accuracy in evaluating ventilation competence was assessed in 20 ACLS provider course attendees, by comparing course instructors' evaluation with measures from a ventilation feedback device. According to course instructors, all candidates acquired adequate ventilation competence. However, data from the feedback device indicated a ventilation not aligned with current guidelines, with higher tidal volume and lower rate (p < 0.01). Deploying quality ventilation during CPR is a skill whose acquisition starts with effective training. Therefore, course instructors' capability to accurately evaluate attendees' ventilation maneuvers is crucial.

Quality improvement project to improve adherence to lung protective ventilation guidelines.

INTRODUCTION: Lung protective ventilation (LPV) is advocated for all patients requiring mechanical ventilation (MV), for any duration of time, to prevent worsening lung injury. Previous studies proved simple interventions can increase awareness of LPV and disease pathophysiology as well as improve adherence to LPV guidelines. OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of a multi-component LPV quality improvement project (QIP) on adherence to LPV guidelines. METHODS: Tidal volume data for all patients requiring MV at a large, tertiary UK critical care unit were collected retrospectively over 3, 6 months, Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles between September 2019 and August 2022. These cycles included the sequential implementation of LPV reports, bedside whiteboards and targeted education led by a multispecialty working group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Adherence against predetermined targets of <5% of MV hours spent at >10 mL/kg predicted body weight (PBW) and >75% of MV hours spent <8 mL/kg PBW for all patients requiring MV. RESULTS: 408 949 hours (17 040 days) of MV data were analysed. Improved LPV adherence was demonstrated throughout the QIP. During mandated MV, time spent >10 mL/kg PBW reduced from 7.65% of MV hours to 4.04% and time spent <8 mL/kg PBW improved from 68.86% of MV hours to 71.87% following the QIP. During spontaneous MV, adherence improved with a reduction in time spent >10 mL/kg PBW from baseline to completion (13.2% vs 6.75%) with increased time spent <8 mL/kg PBW (62.74% vs 72.25%). Despite demonstrating improvements in adherence, we were unable to achieve success in all our predetermined targets. CONCLUSION: This multicomponent intervention including the use of LPV reports, bedside whiteboards and education improves adherence to LPV guidelines. More robust data analysis of reasons for non-adherence to our predetermined targets is required to guide future interventions that may allow further improvement in adherence to LPV guidelines.

Implementation of an Extubation Readiness Guideline for Preterm Infants.

BACKGROUND: Intubated preterm infants 32 6 / 7 weeks or less of gestation in a mid-Atlantic level IV neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) faced a high number of ventilator days. Based on 6 weeks of electronic health record (EHR) chart audits of extubations in this NICU in 2021, 44% of preterm infants 32 6 / 7 weeks or less of gestation were intubated for more than 28 days, with an average of 23 days on a ventilator. This NICU lacked a standardized extubation guideline providing criteria to drive extubation eligibility. PURPOSE: The purpose of this quality improvement (QI) project was to implement and evaluate the effectiveness of an extubation readiness guideline in preterm infants 32 6 / 7 weeks or less of gestation in a mid-Atlantic level IV NICU. METHODS: This project occurred over a 17-week period in 2021. Implementation included a multidisciplinary committee formation, identification of champions, NICU staff education, completion of a guideline checklist by bedside nursing (for eligible patients), clinician reminders, and chart audits for collection of pre-/postimplementation data. Staff education completion, guideline use and compliance, demographic patient data, ventilator days, time to first extubation, and need for reintubation were tracked. RESULTS: Postimplementation data indicated decreased need for intubation for more than 28 days, ventilator days, and days to first extubation attempt. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE AND RESEARCH: Results suggested that implementation of the evidence-based guideline was effective in decreasing average total ventilator days for preterm infants 32 6 / 7 weeks or less of gestation.

AARC Clinical Practice Guideline: Spontaneous Breathing Trials for Liberation From Adult Mechanical Ventilation.

Despite prior publications of clinical practice guidelines related to ventilator liberation, some questions remain unanswered. Many of these questions relate to the details of bedside implementation. We, therefore, formed a guidelines committee of individuals with experience and knowledge of ventilator liberation as well as a medical librarian. Using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology, we make the following recommendations: (1) We suggest that calculation of a rapid shallow breathing index is not needed to determine readiness for a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) (conditional recommendation; moderate certainty); (2) We suggest that SBTs can be conducted with or without pressure support ventilation (conditional recommendation, moderate certainty); (3) We suggest a standardized approach to assessment and, if appropriate, completion of an SBT before noon each day (conditional recommendation, very low certainty); and (4) We suggest that FIO2 should not be increased during an SBT (conditional recommendation, very low certainty). These recommendations are intended to assist bedside clinicians to liberate adult critically ill patients more rapidly from mechanical ventilation.

Development of a clinical practice guideline for physiotherapy management of adults invasively ventilated with community-acquired

Patients hospitalised with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) are frequently admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) for invasive mechanical ventilation and receive treatment by physiotherapists. However, clinical physiotherapy practice is variable for this ICU cohort. To develop a clinical practice guideline for physiotherapy management of adults invasively ventilated with CAP using the best available evidence. Guideline development using evidence synthesis according to the GRADE and JBI approaches, incorporating findings from four preceding phases of a mixed-methods research program: systematic review and meta-analysis, national survey of Australian ICU physiotherapy practice, e-Delphi study to determine expert consensus, and multidisciplinary peer-review of the expert consensus statements by senior ICU clinicians to determine validity and applicability of the statements for translation into practice. The guideline comprises 26 recommendations, encompassing physiotherapy assessment, patient selection and prioritisation, and treatment. Physiotherapy treatment covers domains of humidification, patient positioning, hyperinflation techniques, manual chest wall techniques, normal saline instillation, active treatment, and mobilisation. Recommendations are rated as strong or conditional based on JBI criteria, and certainty of evidence according to GRADE. Considerations for practice are provided within the guideline to enhance clarity and practicality, particularly for conditional recommendations where evidence is limited or conflicting. This guideline, based on the best available evidence for clinical physiotherapy practice for adults invasively ventilated with CAP, is intended to support clinicians with clinical decision making. Further research is required to evaluate guideline implementation into clinical practice, and incorporate the values and preferences of ICU patients and their families.

Liberation from mechanical ventilation in critically Ill patients: Korean Society of Critical Care Medicine Clinical Practice Guidelines

Successful liberation from mechanical ventilation is one of the most crucial processes in critical care because it is the first step by which a respiratory failure patient begins to transition out of the intensive care unit and return to their own life. Therefore, when devising appropriate strategies for removing mechanical ventilation, it is essential to consider not only the individual experiences of healthcare professionals, but also scientific and systematic approaches. Recently, numerous studies have investigated methods and tools for identifying when mechanically ventilated patients are ready to breathe on their own. The Korean Society of Critical Care Medicine therefore provides these recommendations to clinicians about liberation from the ventilator. Methods Meta-analyses and comprehensive syntheses were used to thoroughly review, compile, and summarize the complete body of relevant evidence. All studies were meticulously assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) method, and the outcomes were presented succinctly as evidence profiles. Those evidence syntheses were discussed by a multidisciplinary committee of experts in mechanical ventilation, who then developed and approved recommendations. Results Recommendations for nine PICO (population, intervention, comparator, and outcome) questions about ventilator liberation are presented in this document. This guideline includes seven conditional recommendations, one expert consensus recommendation, and one conditional deferred recommendation. Conclusions We developed these clinical guidelines for mechanical ventilation liberation to provide meaningful recommendations. These guidelines reflect the best treatment for patients seeking liberation from mechanical ventilation.

Implementing the Pediatric Ventilator Liberation Guidelines Using the Most Current Evidence.

Invasive mechanical ventilation is prevalent and associated with considerable morbidity. Pediatric critical care teams must identify the best timing and approach to liberating (extubating) children from this supportive care modality. Unsurprisingly, practice variation varies widely. As a first step to minimizing that variation, the first evidence-based pediatric ventilator liberation guidelines were published in 2023 and included 15 recommendations. Unfortunately, there is often a substantial delay before clinical guidelines reach widespread clinical practice. As such, it is important to consider barriers and facilitators using a systematic approach during implementation planning and design. In this narrative review, we will (1) summarize guideline recommendations, (2) discuss recent evidence and identify practice gaps relating to those recommendations, and (3) hypothesize about potential barriers and facilitators to their implementation in clinical practice.

Effect of body position on the redistribution of regional lung aeration during invasive and non-invasive ventilation of COVID-19 patients.

Severe COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (C-ARDS) requires mechanical ventilation. While this intervention is often performed in the prone position to improve oxygenation, the underlying mechanisms responsible for the improvement in respiratory function during invasive ventilation and awake prone positioning in C-ARDS have not yet been elucidated. In this prospective observational trial, we evaluated the respiratory function of C-ARDS patients while in the supine and prone positions during invasive (n = 13) or non-invasive ventilation (n = 15). The primary endpoint was the positional change in lung regional aeration, assessed with electrical impedance tomography. Secondary endpoints included parameters of ventilation and oxygenation, volumetric capnography, respiratory system mechanics and intrapulmonary shunt fraction. In comparison to the supine position, the prone position significantly increased ventilation distribution in dorsal lung zones for patients under invasive ventilation (53.3 ± 18.3% vs. 43.8 ± 12.3%, percentage of dorsal lung aeration ± standard deviation in prone and supine positions, respectively; p = 0.014); whereas, regional aeration in both positions did not change during non-invasive ventilation (36.4 ± 11.4% vs. 33.7 ± 10.1%; p = 0.43). Prone positioning significantly improved the oxygenation both during invasive and non-invasive ventilation. For invasively ventilated patients reduced intrapulmonary shunt fraction, ventilation dead space and respiratory resistance were observed in the prone position. Oxygenation is improved during non-invasive and invasive ventilation with prone positioning in patients with C-ARDS. Different mechanisms may underly this benefit during these two ventilation modalities, driven by improved distribution of lung regional aeration, intrapulmonary shunt fraction and ventilation-perfusion matching. However, the differences in the severity of C-ARDS may have biased the sensitivity of electrical impedance tomography when comparing positional changes between the protocol groups.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04359407) and Registered 24 April 2020, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04359407 .

Lung- and Diaphragm-Protective Ventilation by Titrating Inspiratory Support to Diaphragm Effort: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVES: Lung- and diaphragm-protective ventilation is a novel concept that aims to limit the detrimental effects of mechanical ventilation on the diaphragm while remaining within limits of lung-protective ventilation. The premise is that low breathing effort under mechanical ventilation causes diaphragm atrophy, whereas excessive breathing effort induces diaphragm and lung injury. In a proof-of-concept study, we aimed to assess whether titration of inspiratory support based on diaphragm effort increases the time that patients have effort in a predefined "diaphragm-protective" range, without compromising lung-protective ventilation. DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial. SETTING: Mixed medical-surgical ICU in a tertiary academic hospital in the Netherlands. PATIENTS: Patients (n = 40) with respiratory failure ventilated in a partially-supported mode. INTERVENTIONS: In the intervention group, inspiratory support was titrated hourly to obtain transdiaphragmatic pressure swings in the predefined "diaphragm-protective" range (3-12 cm H2O). The control group received standard-of-care. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Transdiaphragmatic pressure, transpulmonary pressure, and tidal volume were monitored continuously for 24 hours in both groups. In the intervention group, more breaths were within "diaphragm-protective" range compared with the control group (median 81%; interquartile range [64-86%] vs 35% [16-60%], respectively; p < 0.001). Dynamic transpulmonary pressures (20.5 ± 7.1 vs 18.5 ± 7.0 cm H2O; p = 0.321) and tidal volumes (7.56 ± 1.47 vs 7.54 ± 1.22 mL/kg; p = 0.961) were not different in the intervention and control group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Titration of inspiratory support based on patient breathing effort greatly increased the time that patients had diaphragm effort in the predefined "diaphragm-protective" range without compromising tidal volumes and transpulmonary pressures. This study provides a strong rationale for further studies powered on patient-centered outcomes.

Mechanical ventilation in COVID-19: A physiological perspective.

NEW FINDINGS: What is the topic of this review? This review presents the fundamental concepts of respiratory physiology and pathophysiology, with particular reference to lung mechanics and the pulmonary phenotype associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and subsequent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia. What advances does it highlight? The review provides a critical summary of the main physiological aspects to be considered for safe and effective mechanical ventilation in patients with severe COVID-19 in the intensive care unit. ABSTRACT: Severe respiratory failure from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia not responding to non-invasive respiratory support requires mechanical ventilation. Although ventilation can be a life-saving therapy, it can cause further lung injury if airway pressure and flow and their timing are not tailored to the respiratory system mechanics of the individual patient. The pathophysiology of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection can lead to a pattern of lung injury in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia typically associated with two distinct phenotypes, along a temporal and pathophysiological continuum, characterized by different levels of elastance, ventilation-to-perfusion ratio, right-to-left shunt, lung weight and recruitability. Understanding the underlying pathophysiology, duration of symptoms, radiological characteristics and lung mechanics at the individual patient level is crucial for the appropriate choice of mechanical ventilation settings to optimize gas exchange and prevent further lung injury. By critical analysis of the literature, we propose fundamental physiological and mechanical criteria for the selection of ventilation settings for COVID-19 patients in intensive care units. In particular, the choice of tidal volume should be based on obtaining a driving pressure < 14 cmH2 O, ensuring the avoidance of hypoventilation in patients with preserved compliance and of excessive strain in patients with smaller lung volumes and lower lung compliance. The level of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) should be informed by the measurement of the potential for lung recruitability, where patients with greater recruitability potential may benefit from higher PEEP levels. Prone positioning is often beneficial and should be considered early. The rationale for the proposed mechanical ventilation settings criteria is presented and discussed.

Implementation of a ventilator-associated pneumonia prevention bundle in a teaching hospital / Implementação de um bundle de prevenção de pneumonia associada à ventilação mecânica em um hospital universitário / Implementación de un paquete de prevención de neumonía asociada a ventilador en un hospital escuela

Background and objectives: the implementation of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) prevention bundles in Intensive Care Units (ICU) has been recommended due to the considerable increase in hospital costs, length of stay, morbidity and mortality in affected hospitalized patients. However, the results of its effectiveness are still controversial. This study aimed to assess the impact of implementing a VAP prevention bundle in an Adult ICU of a university hospital. Methods: a quasi-experimental study, with implementation of a VAP prevention bundle in an Adult ICU and analysis of indicators. This study addressed secondary data from hospital records recommended in the routine of the Hospital Infection Control Commission team and from the medical records of patients undergoing mechanical ventilation, from June 2016 to July 2019, who developed VAP. Results: VAP incidence density before the intervention was 4.13 infections, and after the intervention, it was 7.15 infections per thousand patients on ventilation/day. When performing the linear regression test, we showed that VAP density decreased as sedation was reduced, extubation was increased, and when compliance with all bundle elements occurred. Conclusion: there was no reduction in VAP incidence after the adoption of preventive measures, perhaps due to an underreporting of cases in the period prior to the bundle and a low team compliance with the bundle components. However, we noticed a decrease in VAP notifications after the eighth month of implementation of bundle of measures.(AU)

Justificativa e objetivos: a implementação de bundles de prevenção de pneumonia associada à ventilação mecânica (PAV) em Unidades de Terapia Intensiva (UTI) tem sido recomendada devido ao aumento considerável dos custos hospitalares, tempo de internação, morbidade e mortalidade em pacientes hospitalizados acometidos. No entanto, os resultados de sua eficácia ainda são controversos. Este estudo teve como objetivo avaliar o impacto da implantação de um bundle de prevenção de PAV em uma UTI Adulto de um hospital universitário. Métodos: estudo quase experimental, com implantação de bundle de prevenção de PAV em UTI Adulto e análise de indicadores. Este estudo abordou dados secundários de prontuários hospitalares recomendados na rotina da equipe da Comissão de Controle de Infecção Hospitalar e dos prontuários de pacientes em ventilação mecânica, no período de junho de 2016 a julho de 2019, que desenvolveram PAV. Resultados: A densidade de incidência de PAV antes da intervenção foi de 4,13 infecções e após a intervenção foi de 7,15 infecções por mil pacientes em ventilação/dia. Ao realizar o teste de regressão linear, mostramos que a densidade da PAV diminuiu à medida que a sedação era reduzida, a extubação aumentava e quando ocorria complacência com todos os elementos do feixe. Conclusão: não houve redução da incidência de PAV após a adoção de medidas preventivas, talvez pela subnotificação de casos no período anterior ao bundle e baixa adesão da equipe aos componentes do bundle. No entanto, notamos diminuição das notificações de PAV após o oitavo mês de implantação do bundle de medidas.(AU)

Justificación y objetivos: la implementación de paquetes de prevención de neumonía asociada al ventilador (NAV) en las Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos (UCI) ha sido recomendada debido al aumento considerable de los costos hospitalarios, la estancia hospitalaria, la morbilidad y la mortalidad en los pacientes hospitalizados afectados. Sin embargo, los resultados de su eficacia aún son controvertidos. Este estudio tuvo como objetivo evaluar el impacto de la implementación de un paquete de prevención de NAVM en una UCI de adultos de un hospital universitario. Métodos: estudio cuasi-experimental, con implementación de un paquete de prevención de NAVM en una UCI de Adultos y análisis de indicadores. Este estudio abordó datos secundarios de registros hospitalarios recomendados en la rutina del equipo de la Comisión de Control de Infecciones Hospitalarias y de los registros médicos de pacientes en ventilación mecánica, de junio de 2016 a julio de 2019, que desarrollaron NAV. Resultados: La densidad de incidencia de NAVM antes de la intervención fue de 4,13 infecciones y después de la intervención fue de 7,15 infecciones por mil pacientes en ventilación/día. Al realizar la prueba de regresión lineal, mostramos que la densidad de VAP disminuyó a medida que se redujo la sedación, se incrementó la extubación y cuando se produjo el cumplimiento de todos los elementos del paquete. Conclusión: no hubo reducción en la incidencia de NAVM después de la adopción de las medidas preventivas, quizás debido a un subregistro de casos en el período anterior al paquete y al bajo cumplimiento del equipo con los componentes del paquete. Sin embargo, notamos una disminución en las notificaciones de VAP después del octavo mes de implementación del paquete de medidas.(Au)

Modos ventilatorios usados en pacientes críticos con covid-19 en la región de Lombardía, Italia / Ventilation modes used in critical patient with COVID-19 in the region of Lombardy, Italy

RESUMEN Introducción: la covid-19 es una enfermedad donde la ventilación mecánica artificial cobra vital importancia. Se estima que el 50 % de los casos graves o críticos que requieren manejo en unidades de cuidados intensivos fallecen. Objetivos: se evaluó el impacto de los modos ventilatorios usados en pacientes con covid-19 en Lombardía, Italia, en la oxigenación, la hemodinámica y la mortalidad. Materiales y métodos: se realizó un estudio analítico longitudinal retrospectivo en 86 pacientes críticos con covid-19, en el Hospital Mayor de Crema, en Lombardía, Italia, desde el 1 de abril al 20 de mayo de 2020. Se realizaron análisis no paramétrico y de la varianza. Resultados: Hubo una supervivencia del 76,7 %. El modo utilizado tuvo igual comportamiento en occisos (BiPAP-3, PCV-4, VCRP-4, APRV-5, VCV-4) y en vivos (BiPAP-10, PCV-17, VCRP-14, APRV-15, VCV-10); test de x2 = 0,59; test de análisis de la varianza media índice PO2/FIO2 (PCV = 132), (BiPAP = 132) (VCV = 115) p = 0,924. La presión de final de espiración positiva (BiPAP-12, PCV-13, VCRP-13, APRV-13, VCV-14) con p = 0,205. PCO2 (BiPAP-55, PCV-52, VCRP-57, APRV-59, VCV-57) con p = 0,512. La tensión arterial media (BiPAP-84, PCV-83, VCRP-84, APRV-82, VCV-83) con p = 0,988. Modelos de cálculo de la presión de final de espiración positiva, según modo ventilatorio: BiPAP: PEEP = -0,0331 (índice PO2/FiO2) +18,215; PCV: PEEP = -0,0047 (índice PO2/FiO2) +13,717; VCRP: PEEP = -0,0204 (índice PO2/FiO2) +15,678; APRV: PEEP = -0,0092 (índice PO2/FiO2) +14,889. Conclusiones: la evolución del paciente crítico con covid-19 está determinada en gran medida por la ventilación mecánica invasiva; sin embargo, no existió suficiente evidencia para recomendar una u otra modalidad ventilatoria. El éxito está en conocer con exactitud las características del respirador, su modalidad y el paciente en cuestión. (AU)

ABSTRACT Introduction: COVID-19 is a disease in which mechanical ventilation acquires vital importance. It is estimated that 50 % of the serious and critical patients requiring management in intensive care units die. Objectives: to assess the impact of the ventilation modes used in patients with COVID-19 in Lombardy, Italy, on oxygenation, hemodynamics and mortality. Materials and methods: a retrospective, longitudinal, analytic study was carried out in 86 critical patients with COVID-19 who entered the Main Hospital of Crema, in Lombardy, Italy, from April 1st to May 20, 2020. Results: the survival was 76.7 %. The used mode showed the same behavior in deceased patients (BiPAP-3, PCV-4, VCRP-4, APRV-5, VCV-4) and in alive patients (BiPAP-10, PCV-17, VCRP-14, APRV-15, VCV-10). X2 = 0.59. ANOVA test index PO2/FIO2 (PCV = 132), (BiPAP = 132) (VCV=115) p = 0.924. PEEP (BiPAP-12, PCV-13, VCRP-13, APRV-13, VCV-14) p = 0.205. PCO2 (BiPAP-55, PCV-52, VCRP-57, APRV-59, VCV-57) p = 0.512. Average blood pressure (BiPAP-84, PCV-83, VCRP-84, APRV-82, VCV-83) p = 0.988. PEEP models according to ventilation mode: BiPAP: PEEP = -0.0331 (PO2/FiO2 index) +18.215. PCV: PEEP = -0.0047 (PO2/FiO2 index) + 13.717; VCRP: PEEP = -0.0204 (PO2/FiO2 index) + 15.678; APRV: PEEP = -0.0092 (PO2/FiO2 index) +14.889. Conclusion: the evolution of the critical patient with COVID-19 is determined mostly by the invasive mechanical ventilation; but we did not find evidence enough to recommend one or the other ventilation mode. The success stands in knowing accurately the characteristics of the ventilator, the ventilation modes and the patient (AU).