A comparison of postoperative outcomes based on recipient vessels in scalp free flap reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: The superficial temporal artery (STA) and facial artery (FA) are two commonly used recipient vessels when performing free tissue transfer to the head and neck. This meta-analysis compares the impact of recipient vessel location on free flap outcomes in scalp reconstruction. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA-P guidelines using six databases. Studies reporting free tissue transfer using the STA or FA as a recipient vessel for reconstructing scalp defects were included. Outcomes of interest included flap loss, partial flap necrosis, wound dehiscence, venous thrombosis, and infection rates. Quality evaluation was performed using ASPS criteria and the ROBINS-I tool. RESULTS: Of 3270 identified articles, 12 were included for final analysis. In total, 125 free flaps were identified (75 STA, 50 FA). Pooled analysis demonstrated an overall flap survival rate of 98.4% (STA 98.7% vs. FA 98.0%; p = .782). The mean defect size was significantly greater for flaps using the STA compared with the FA (223.7 ± 119.4 cm2 vs. 157.1 ± 96.5 cm2, p = .001). The FA group had a higher incidence of wound dehiscence than the STA group (14.0% vs. 1.3%, p = .005). However, meta-analysis demonstrated no significant difference in rates of wound dehiscence, flap loss, partial flap necrosis, venous congestion, or postoperative infection between groups. CONCLUSION: This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to assess recipient vessel selection in scalp reconstruction. Our results do not support a single vessel as the superior choice in scalp reconstruction. Rather, these findings suggest that the decision between using the STA or FA is multifaceted, requiring a flexible approach that considers the individual characteristics of each case. Further research is needed to explore additional factors influencing recipient vessel selection, including defect location, radiation therapy, and prior head and neck surgery.

Pushing boundaries: Anterolateral thigh free flaps for extensive scalp defects beyond previous limits, leveraging imaging modalities with ultrasound and indocyanine green.

BACKGROUND: Scalp defect reconstruction poses considerable challenges, with ongoing debates regarding the most effective strategies. While the latissimus dorsi (LD) flap has traditionally been favored, the anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap has been well described as a versatile alternative for addressing extensive scalp defects. This study underscores the success of scalp reconstruction using ALT flaps, notably pushing the boundaries of previously reported flap sizes. Our approach leverages the use of indocyanine green (ICG) perfusion to guide precise preoperative planning and vascular modification, contributing to improved outcomes in challenging cases. METHODS: We performed 43 ALT flap reconstructions for scalp defects between 2016 and 2023. We collected patients' demographic and clinical data and evaluated flap size and recipient vessels and additional surgical techniques. Detailed preoperative plans with ultrasound and ICG use for intraoperative plans were performed to find perforators location. The cohort was divided into two, with or without complications on flaps, and analyzed depending on its surgical details. RESULTS: This study involved 38 patients with extensive scalp defects (mean age: 69.4 ± 11 years) who underwent ALT perforator flap transfers (mean flap size: 230.88 ± 145.6 cm2). There was only one case of unsuccessful flap transfer, and four cases had a few complications. The characteristics of the complication group included a large flap size (303.1 ± 170.9 vs. 214.9 ± 136.6 cm2, P = .211), few perforator numbers without pedicle manipulation, lack of intraoperative indocyanine green administration (75% vs. 25%, P = .607), and the use of superficial temporal vessels as recipient vessels. CONCLUSIONS: Scalp reconstruction using large ALT free flaps with the aid of imaging modalities facilitates the optimization of surgical techniques, such as pedicle manipulation, perforator numbers, and vein considerations, thereby contributing to successful reconstruction.

Facial Hair in Hair Restoration Surgery: Beard Transplantation and Beard-To-Scalp Hair Restoration.

Restoration of the beard region has become an important component of hair restoration surgery due to increased awareness of its natural-appearing results. In the author's experience performing more than 700 primary beard hair transplants and tens of reparative procedures, key aesthetic steps include proper graft dissection so that one- and two-hair grafts contain a minimal cuff of surrounding skin, acute angulation and appropriate direction of recipient sites using the smallest possible recipient-site blades, and aesthetic design.

FUE as the first surgical option for hair reconstruction on scalp and facial skin grafts - case report.

Post-combustion alopecia presents a complex medical challenge with implications spanning dermatological and psychiatric disorders. The use of hair transplantation has proven to be a significant improvement for this condition. However, the current management involves various techniques, each with advantages and disadvantages. Progressive skin expansions, surgical scar reduction, and skin grafts containing hair follicles yield unsatisfactory aesthetic outcomes and have limited applicability as a first-line treatment for fire victims. So far, follicular unit extraction (FUE) has proven to be one of the most versatile procedures in such cases, having the potential to restore a natural anatomical profile closely resembling the pre-traumatic appearance that led to the traumatic alopecia. Additionally, it contributes to the improvement of associated psychiatric comorbidities, facilitating proper social reintegration and enhancing overall quality of life. This report focuses on a case of post-combustion alopecia and severe facial distortion due to third-degree burns resulting in severe psychiatric comorbidities, which benefited from a proper social reintegration and improvement of the quality of life after three consecutive sessions of FUE for scalp and eyebrow hair.

Cranioplasty is not required in the reconstruction of small combined scalp and calvarial defects.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of scalp malignancies may include the need for craniectomy. The decision to perform cranioplasty is not straightforward and is frequently subjective. The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical outcomes after reconstruction of complex scalp and calvarial defects by comparing patients with and without cranioplasty. METHODS: Retrospective review of the clinical records of a consecutive series of patients who underwent scalp soft tissue reconstruction after craniectomy for malignancy or osteoradionecrosis between 2014 and 2022 at Royal Melbourne Hospital was conducted. Demographics, previous treatments, surgical details, and post-operative complications were assessed. Traumatic injuries and decompressive craniectomies were excluded. Minimum follow-up of 6 months. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients were included in the study. Indications for surgery included skin malignancies, osteoradionecrosis, or both. There was one reconstructive failure (in the non-cranioplasty group). Infection and metalware exposure were common complications in patients who underwent cranioplasty (38.5%). No patient developed neurological symptoms subsequent to craniectomy. One patient needed revision surgery due to esthetic reasons (cranioplasty group). Transposition flaps were associated with more complications and revision procedures. CONCLUSION: Combined scalp and calvarial defects pose a difficult reconstructive challenge. Stable soft tissue coverage is more reliably achieved with free flap reconstruction. Cranioplasty is not always mandatory and should be reserved for cases with a very large bony defect or when the defect is located in a cosmetically sensitive area.

An algorithmic approach to scalp reconstructive surgery: maximization of cosmetic and functional outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Scalp reconstruction requires knowledge of scalp anatomy and reconstructive options. Advances in the field have led to numerous procedures being at the disposal of the reconstructive surgeon, expanding treatment options for patients. OBJECTIVE: To provide an algorithmic approach and general guidelines to consider when deciding on which scalp surgery will optimize cosmetic and functional outcomes. METHODS & MATERIALS: Previous literature was searched for the last 20 years to provide an updated guide. RESULTS: Taking into consideration the location, size and local scalp anatomy of a presenting defect will lead to optimal surgical outcomes. Other confounding factors such as bone exposure and extremely large defects will affect decision making. An algorithmic approach has been provided in this review. CONCLUSION: While many reconstructive surgical options are available, the best ones will depend on individual presentation of scalp defects. Location and size are first line considerations while local scalp anatomy will allow for tailoring of reconstructive options. This will help to maximize cosmetic and aesthetic considerations.

Letter to editor: Scalp incision technique for decompressive hemicraniectomy: Comparative systematic review and meta­analysis of the reverse question mark versus alternative retroauricular and Kempe incision techniques of published cases.

The "Letter to the Editor" titled "Scalp incision technique for decompressive hemicraniectomy: comparative systematic review and meta-analysis of the reverse question mark versus alternative retroauricular and Kempe incision techniques of published cases" provides a detailed analysis of different scalp incision techniques in decompressive hemicraniectomy procedures. While commendable for its systematic approach and valuable insights, the letter has several limitations, including a lack of transparency in the search strategy, failure to address potential sources of bias, and a narrow focus on technical aspects without considering broader outcome domains and practical considerations. Despite these limitations, the letter underscores the importance of evidence-based decision-making in neurosurgical practice and calls for further research to address these gaps.

Scalp necrosis following preoperative endovascular embolisation of the superficial temporal artery for meningioma.

A woman in her late 50s with a left frontal lobe convexity meningioma underwent an elective endovascular embolisation of the left middle meningeal artery and distal branches of the left superficial temporal artery prior to surgical resection of the tumour. On postoperative day 46, she developed scalp necrosis, leading to poor wound healing requiring wound debridement and a complex plastic surgery reconstruction with a rotational flap. Endovascular embolisation of vascular tumours prior to surgical resection does not come without risks. The lack of consistency in the literature regarding indication, technique and outcomes makes it difficult to define the exact role of preoperative meningioma embolisation.

Use of Integra® on avascular tissue.

Integra® (Integra LifeSciences) is a well-known dermal regeneration template used in partial and full-thickness wound reconstruction. It can be applied directly on to vascular tissue to create a bed for a skin graft, which is often placed in a second surgery. We present our experience of its novel use in oral and maxillofacial surgery patients, using it directly on bone and cartilage (avascular tissue) without further skin grafting. Patients who required full-thickness excision of lesions down to bone or cartilage and who were treated using Integra® were included. After scalp or ear lesion resection, the collagenous dermal layer of Integra® was placed directly on to bone or cartilage and, along with its outer silicone epidermal layer, secured to the defect with absorbable sutures and a bolster dressing. The wounds were kept dry for 14 days, at which point the dressing and silicone were removed and patients continued regular wound care. Seventeen patients were included, 15 of whom had squamous cell carcinoma. One was lost to follow up. The rest achieved complete healing of the defect. Histology showed epidermis developing on the Integra® surface and at one year, the appearance of normal scarred skin. This novel approach could redefine the uses of Integra®, avoiding the need for free-flap surgery or skin grafting when reconstructing large defects. Further resection of close margins or recurrence is easier after reconstruction using dermal regeneration material than after reconstruction with a local or free flap.

How to Safely Use the Perforator-based Keystone Island Flap in the Scalp: Basal Cell Carcinoma of the Scalp With Local Invasion to Calvarium.

Scalp reconstruction has always been a challenging problem for even the most experienced surgeon to provide good aesthetic and functional results. This is mainly because the scalp is less mobile and tight, requiring a much larger dissection for the size of the original defect. We hypothesized that the omega variant perforator-based keystone island flap at the subgaleal plane provides a versatile and easily reproducible reconstructive option for scalp reconstruction after wide skin cancer excision. We reviewed all patients who underwent reconstruction with the keystone flap or its modification to repair scalp defects following wide resection of skin cancer in the scalp abutting calvarium from May 2021 to July 2023. We designed the flap width 50% wider than original keystone flap design first introduced by Dr. Behan. We reconstructed medium- to large-sized scalp defects ranging from 2×2 to 5×5 cm 2 using an omega variant perforator-based keystone island flap. All patients were satisfied with the aesthetic outcomes without complications. Keystone flaps are a versatile option for reconstructing the scalp after cancer resection. This strategy obviates the need for skin grafting, myocutaneous flap or free flap after cancer removal in the scalp.

Nerve Blocks for Craniotomy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Postcraniotomy headache (PCH) is a common adverse event and can lead to various complications and decreased quality of life. RECENT FINDINGS: To reduce postcraniotomy pain and associated complications, a multimodal pain therapy including analgesics, analgesic adjuncts, and regional anesthesia is essential. The use of opioids should be minimized to facilitate prompt postoperative neurosurgical assessment. Here, we provide an update on the latest evidence regarding the role of scalp nerve blocks in the pain management of patients undergoing craniotomy procedure. Nerve blocks are effective in alleviating postoperative pain after craniotomy. Scalp blocks contribute to lower pain levels and less opioid consumption in the first 48 h following surgery. Moreover, there is a significant decrease in patients suffering from PONV among patients who receive scalp block.

Combined Preoperative Endovascular Embolization and Surgical Excision for Scalp Arteriovenous Malformations: A Systematic Review and Case Illustration.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of the combined approach of preoperative endovascular embolization (EE) and surgical excision (SE) for scalp arteriovenous malformation (AVM) and present an illustrative case report. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted using online databases (PubMed/Medline, Cochrane, and Embase) on February 15, 2023. The inclusion criteria were any type of study of patients with scalp AVMs who were diagnosed and confirmed through angiography and treated with combined preoperative EE and SE. All the articles that met the inclusion criteria were included in this study. RESULTS: A total of 49 articles (91 patients) were included. The patients' age ranged from 10 days to 70 years at the time of presentation. The most common symptoms were a pulsatile mass in 51 patients (56.04%), progressively growing mass in 31 patients (34.06%), and bruits and/or thrills in 22 patients (24.17%). Complications of preoperative EE and SE were observed in only 5 patients; 3 patients (3.29%) had harvested skin graft marginal necrosis, 1 patient (1.09%) had skin necrosis, and 1 patient (1.09%) had a wound infection. Only 2 patients (2.19%) reported a recurrent or residual mass during a median follow-up period of 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: The management of scalp AVMs can be challenging; therefore, focused, and accurate identification of the complexity of the vascular anatomy is required. The combined method of preoperative EE and SE showed satisfactory outcomes with low rates of complications and recurrence; thus, we recommend this approach for the management of scalp AVMs.

Scalp incision technique for decompressive hemicraniectomy: comparative systematic review and meta-analysis of the reverse question mark versus alternative retroauricular and Kempe incision techniques.

Decompressive hemicraniectomy (DHC) is a critical procedure used to alleviate elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) in emergent situations. It is typically performed to create space for the swelling brain and to prevent dangerous and potentially fatal increases in ICP. DHC is indicated for pathologies ranging from MCA stroke to traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage-essentially any cause of refractory brain swelling and elevated ICPs. Scalp incisions for opening and closing the soft tissues during DHC are crucial to achieve optimal outcomes by promoting proper wound healing and minimizing surgical site infections (SSIs). Though the reverse question mark (RQM) scalp incision has gained significant traction within neurosurgical practice, alternatives-including the retroauricular (RA) and Kempe incisions-have been proposed. As choice of technique can impact postoperative outcomes and complications, we sought to compare outcomes associated with different scalp incision techniques used during DHC. We queried three databases according to PRISMA guidelines in order to identify studies comparing outcomes between the RQM versus "alternative" scalp incision techniques for DHC. Our primary outcome of interest in the present study was postoperative wound infection rates according to scalp incision type. Secondary outcomes included estimated blood loss (EBL) and operative duration. We identified seven studies eligible for inclusion in the formal meta-analysis. The traditional RQM technique shortened operative times by 36.56 min, on average. Additionally, mean EBL was significantly lower when the RQM scalp incision was used. Postoperatively, there was no significant association between DHC incision type and mean intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), nor was there a significant difference in predisposition to developing wound complications or infections between the RQM and retroauricular/Kempe incision cohorts. Superficial temporal artery (STA) preservation and reoperation rates were collected but could not be analyzed due to insufficient number of studies reporting these outcomes. Our meta-analysis suggests that there is no significant difference between scalp incision techniques as they relate to surgical site infection and wound complications. At present, it appears that outcomes following DHC can be improved by ensuring that the bone flap is large enough to enable sufficient cerebral expansion and decompression of the temporal lobe, the latter of which is of particular importance. Although previous studies have suggested that there are several advantages to performing alternative scalp incision techniques during DHC, the present study (which is to our knowledge the first to meta-analyze the literature on outcomes in DHC by scalp incision type) does not support these findings. As such, further investigations in the form of prospective trials with high statistical power are merited.

Scalp wound management: a narrative review from a neurosurgical perspective.

OBJECTIVE: This article aims to present a narrative review of current literature about the anatomical characteristics of the scalp as well as current practices in the management of surgical, traumatic and pressure injuries in the scalp, which are common in neurosurgery practice. METHOD: We searched PubMed for publications and book chapters in English from 2011 to 2021. We also included commonly referenced papers that we considered relevant to the subject with publication before these dates. We used the search terms 'laceration,' and/or 'neurosurgery' and/or, 'pressure injury,' and/or 'craniotomy,' and/or 'surgical incision' in combination with 'scalp,' and/or 'wound care.' We also searched the reference lists of publications identified by the search strategy and selected those that we judged relevant. RESULTS: We pre-selected 52 articles that covered various aspects of anatomy, pathophysiology, scalp wound management, or general wound care that we considered applied to the anatomical region of our interest. After abstract review, we selected 34 articles that met our search criteria and were included in our review. CONCLUSION: There is limited evidence regarding classification and care of scalp wounds. As a result, many of the current practices for scalp wound management are based on evidence derived from studies involving different anatomical regions, not considering its particular anatomy, vasculature and microbiome. Further research is needed for more comprehensive and effective protocols for the management of scalp injuries. However, this present review proposes responses to the identified gaps concerning the management of scalp wounds.