Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 21.845
Filter
1.
Georgian Med News ; (349): 31-35, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38963197

ABSTRACT

The process of osteointegration of dental implants is a biological process. Systemic therapy can interfere with this process, affecting the growth and breakdown processes of the bone and ultimately leading to implant failure. This literature review focuses on specific groups of systemic drugs that directly impact osteointegration. The research in electronic literature was conducted using the National Library of Medicine's PubMed/MEDLINE database from March 2000 to February 2024. The following MeSH (Medical Subject Headings) terms were used: "implant osseointegration," "bisphosphonates," "non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs," "glucocorticoids," "proton pump inhibitors," and "selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs)." This search yielded 1,258 articles on implant osseointegration. Among these, 30 articles met our criteria for implant osseointegration and bisphosphonates, 2 articles for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), 7 articles for glucocorticoids, 14 articles for proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), and 14 articles for selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). Clinicians considering implant therapy should be mindful of potential medication-related implant failures. The present systematic review has identified an association between proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), glucocorticoids, and bisphosphonates with an increased implant failure rate.


Subject(s)
Dental Implants , Osseointegration , Proton Pump Inhibitors , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors , Humans , Osseointegration/drug effects , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Diphosphonates/therapeutic use , Glucocorticoids
2.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 15167, 2024 07 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38956425

ABSTRACT

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) are reported to cause stress cardiomyopathy (SC). This study evaluated the association between SSRI/SNRI use and the occurrence of cardiomyopathy in the publicly available U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Disproportionate analysis and likelihood ratio tests were used to identify risk associated with SSRIs or SNRIs and the incidence of SC, using data from between from 2012 to 2022 acquired from the FAERS database. The study identified 132 individual case safety reports (ICSRs) of SC associated with SSRIs or SNRIs. Venlafaxine (48%) and fluoxetine (27%) were the most common antidepressants of the ICSRs. Approximately 80% of SC cases were reported in females, with individuals aged 45-65 years identified as a high-risk population. Both venlafaxine (ratio-scale information component [RSIC] 2.54, 95% CI 2.06-3.04) and fluoxetine (RSIC 3.20, 95% CI 2.31-4.47) were associated with SC, with likelihood ratio estimates of 3.55 (p = 0.02) for venlafaxine and 4.82 (p = 0.008) for fluoxetine. The median time to cardiomyopathy onset was 20 days, with hospitalization reported in 48.33% of patients. Venlafaxine and fluoxetine were associated with SC risk, particularly in middle-aged women. Caution should be exercised when using SSRIs or SNRIs combined with other serotonergic medications.


Subject(s)
Pharmacovigilance , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors , Serotonin and Noradrenaline Reuptake Inhibitors , Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy , Humans , Female , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Aged , Serotonin and Noradrenaline Reuptake Inhibitors/adverse effects , Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy/chemically induced , Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy/epidemiology , Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems , Adult , United States/epidemiology , Venlafaxine Hydrochloride/adverse effects , Fluoxetine/adverse effects , Databases, Factual , Risk Factors
3.
S D Med ; 77(4): 172-179, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38991162

ABSTRACT

This article presents a summary of information found within the existing medical literature on the pharmacological treatment options for maternal depression during lactation and the concurrent effects on the breastfeeding infant. Existing data on safety and efficacy varies by treatment modality. Medications used to treat depression are all secreted in breast milk to some extent; however, most antidepressants are considered relatively safe to use during breastfeeding. The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) sertraline and paroxetine are present in low levels and are considered preferred agents. Safety data for other antidepressants varies, however. monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) should generally be avoided. Available references and resources can help providers optimize treatment of maternal depression while mitigating risk to the infant. Optimizing treatment of maternal depression is a complicated undertaking, which should be made in conjunction with the provider through shared decision making with the patient. Specific properties of any proposed medication, such as the relative infant dose and side effect profile, should always be taken into account during the decision-making process.


Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents , Breast Feeding , Depression, Postpartum , Lactation , Humans , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Antidepressive Agents/adverse effects , Lactation/drug effects , Female , Depression, Postpartum/drug therapy , Milk, Human/chemistry , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/adverse effects , Infant, Newborn
4.
J Cogn Psychother ; 38(3): 211-226, 2024 Jul 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38991742

ABSTRACT

Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) has been found efficacious in randomized clinical trials (RCTs), but the two widely known RCTs were conducted within the United States with predominantly White samples. Research that evaluates treatments like ACT for OCD outside the typical Western cultures is needed. The current scoping review summarizes the key characteristics and findings from 18 RCTs that evaluated ACT for OCD in Iran. These RCTs are largely unknown in the broader scientific literature despite representing the vast majority of ACT for OCD trials, in part because the majority are published in Persian. The preponderance of RCTs treated participants in groups, and most protocols did not include exposure exercises. Of 18 trials, 5 were single sex. Use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) was common with all participants on stable doses at pretreatment in many of the trials. Methodological quality was low to medium. ACT was inconsistent against nontraditional comparison conditions, slightly favorable to empirically validated treatments, and favorable compared with the waitlist and SSRIs. The process of change data indicated that ACT increased the psychological flexibility more than cognitive behavior therapy or SSRIs. These results highlight that findings on ACT for OCD from Western populations replicate and generalize to individuals in Iran. These findings also offer insights gained from studying ACT in Iran and significantly expand the literature based on ACT for OCD that can be integrated into scholarship by all researchers.


Subject(s)
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy , Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder , Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder/therapy , Humans , Iran , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/therapeutic use
5.
S D Med ; 77(2): 73-78, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38986161

ABSTRACT

Depressive disorders among children and adolescents impact the practice of many providers, in many specialties. These disorders contribute to illness and disability throughout the world, and they are a significant risk factor for suicide. Depression in these age groups can differ from those in adults, and early recognition along with proper treatment can lead to improved outcomes. It is important for clinicians to differentiate depression from other possible diagnoses such as anxiety disorders, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and other mood disorders. Once the diagnosis of depression is established, the severity should be assessed to determine the most appropriate level of treatment. Outpatient treatment often starts with therapy, and if medications are indicated, the use of selectiveserotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) tend to be first-line.


Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder , Humans , Adolescent , Child , Depressive Disorder/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder/drug therapy , Depressive Disorder/therapy , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/therapeutic use
6.
J Avian Med Surg ; 38(2): 98-107, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38980819

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to establish the pharmacokinetics of a single oral dose of trazodone in the Hispaniolan Amazon parrot (Amazona ventralis). Trazodone is a selective serotonin antagonist and reuptake inhibitor used commonly in both human and veterinary medicine as an antidepressant behavioral modification medicine. A single oral dose of compounded trazodone hydrochloride solution (20 mg/mL) at 50 mg/kg was administered to a total of 7 healthy adult Hispaniolan Amazon parrots. The 7 healthy adult parrots ranged in age from 10 to 15 years and weighed 228 to 323g. Blood was collected at baseline (2 weeks before study) and at 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, and 14 hours post-drug administration. Plasma concentrations of both trazodone and its active metabolite m-chlorophenylpiperazine (mCPP) were measured via liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Noncompartmental pharmacokinetic analysis was completed. The half-life (t1/2) ± SD of trazodone for the Hispaniolan parrots was 1.89 ± 0.49 hours, and the t1/2 ± SD of mCPP metabolite was 1.9 ± 0.55 hours. Maximum serum drug concentrations, or Cmax (ng/mL), were 738.3 ± 285.3 for trazodone. Times to achieve Cmax (hours) for trazadone and the mCPP metabolite were 1 hour and 2 hours postdosing, respectively. While this study did not establish the behavioral effects of trazodone, no adverse side effects were observed throughout the 48-hour period following drug administration and blood collection. Our results indicate that the oral administration of a 50-mg/kg single dose of trazodone to Hispaniolan parrots may be considered a safe dose. Plasma concentrations are comparable to previously published values in humans, dogs, horses, and pigeons (Columba livia domestica) for up to 14 hours following dosing. This study indicates that further studies are needed to establish the pharmacodynamics and the efficacy of trazodone in the medical management of behavioral problems in psittacine species.


Subject(s)
Amazona , Trazodone , Animals , Trazodone/pharmacokinetics , Trazodone/administration & dosage , Trazodone/blood , Amazona/blood , Half-Life , Male , Area Under Curve , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/pharmacokinetics , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/blood , Female , Administration, Oral
7.
Am J Case Rep ; 25: e943422, 2024 Jul 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38951999

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND Rhabdomyolysis, an uncommon but recognized adverse effect of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressants, can precipitate acute renal injury (AKI), especially when combined with risk factors such as alcohol consumption. This report describes a 68-year-old man with acute renal failure due to rhabdomyolysis associated with alcohol intoxication while taking low-dose escitalopram, an SSRI antidepressant. CASE REPORT The patient, with a history of bipolar affective disorder managed with escitalopram, presented with symptoms of general malaise, diarrhea, myalgias, and transient loss of consciousness following substantial ethanol consumption. Laboratory tests indicated severe rhabdomyolysis with a creatine kinase level of 37 672 U/L and myoglobin level >5710 ng/ml, leading to an AKI diagnosis. The discontinuation of escitalopram, along with hydration and renal replacement therapy, facilitated renal recovery. However, the reintroduction of escitalopram resulted in the recurrence of rhabdomyolysis, suggesting a probable causal link, confirmed using the Naranjo Adverse Drug Reaction Probability Scale. CONCLUSIONS This report highlights the importance of identifying the medication history in patients presenting with acute renal failure and rhabdomyolysis and the association with SSRIs, which can be exacerbated by alcohol. This case underscores the importance of vigilant medication history assessment in patients presenting with AKI and rhabdomyolysis, particularly concerning the use of SSRIs like escitalopram, which can pose heightened risks in the context of alcohol use. It highlights the need for clinical caution in managing patients on long-term SSRI therapy, especially when reintroducing such medications after an episode of rhabdomyolysis.


Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury , Alcoholic Intoxication , Citalopram , Rhabdomyolysis , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors , Humans , Male , Rhabdomyolysis/chemically induced , Acute Kidney Injury/chemically induced , Aged , Citalopram/adverse effects , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/adverse effects , Alcoholic Intoxication/complications
8.
Int J Mol Sci ; 25(12)2024 Jun 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38928021

ABSTRACT

Drug repurposing, rebranding an existing drug for a new therapeutic indication, is deemed a beneficial approach for a quick and cost-effective drug discovery process by skipping preclinical, Phase 1 trials and pharmacokinetic studies. Several psychotropic drugs, including selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), were studied for their potential application in different diseases, especially in cancer therapy. Fluoxetine (FLX) is one of the most prescribed psychotropic agents from the SSRIs class for the treatment of several neuropsychiatric disorders with a favorable safety profile. FLX exhibited different oncolytic effects via mechanisms distinct from its main serotonergic activity. Taking advantage of its ability to rapidly penetrate the blood-brain barrier, FLX could be particularly useful in brain tumors. This was proved by different in vitro and in vivo experiments using FLX as a monotherapy or combination with temozolomide (TMZ) or radiotherapy. In this review of the literature, we summarize the potential pleiotropic oncolytic roles of FLX against different cancers, highlighting the multifaceted activities of FLX and its ability to interrupt cancer proliferation via several molecular mechanisms and even surmount multidrug resistance (MDR). We elaborated on the successful synergistic combinations such as FXR/temozolomide and FXR/raloxifene for the treatment of glioblastoma and breast cancer, respectively. We showcased beneficial pharmaceutical trials to load FLX onto carriers to enhance its safety and efficacy on cancer cells. This is the first review article extensively summarizing all previous FLX repurposing studies for the management of cancer.


Subject(s)
Drug Repositioning , Fluoxetine , Humans , Drug Repositioning/methods , Fluoxetine/therapeutic use , Fluoxetine/pharmacology , Animals , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use , Psychotropic Drugs/pharmacology , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/pharmacology
9.
Commun Biol ; 7(1): 710, 2024 Jun 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38851804

ABSTRACT

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are widely used for depression based on the monoamine deficiency hypothesis. However, the clinical use of these agents is controversial, in part because of their variable clinical efficacy and in part because of their delayed onset of action. Because of the complexities involved in replicating human disease and clinical dosing in animal models, the scientific community has not reached a consensus on the reasons for these phenomena. In this work, we create a theoretical hippocampal model incorporating escitalopram's pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics (competitive and non-competitive inhibition, and serotonin transporter (SERT) internalization), inflammation, and receptor dynamics. With this model, we simulate chronic oral escitalopram in mice showing that days to weeks are needed for serotonin levels to reach steady-state. We show escitalopram's chemical efficacy is diminished under inflammation. Our model thus offers mechanisms for how chronic escitalopram affects brain serotonin, emphasizing the importance of optimized dose and time for future antidepressant discoveries.


Subject(s)
Escitalopram , Inflammation , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors , Serotonin Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins , Serotonin Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins/metabolism , Animals , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/pharmacology , Mice , Inflammation/drug therapy , Inflammation/metabolism , Escitalopram/pharmacology , Hippocampus/metabolism , Hippocampus/drug effects , Serotonin/metabolism , Humans , Citalopram/pharmacology
10.
J Biosci ; 492024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38920106

ABSTRACT

Noradrenaline (NA) and serotonin (5-HT) induce nociception and antinociception. This antagonistic effect can be explained by the dose and type of activated receptors. We investigated the existence of synergism between the noradrenergic and serotonergic systems during peripheral antinociception. The paw pressure test was performed in mice that had increased sensitivity by intraplantar injection of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2). Noradrenaline (80 ng) administered intraplantarly induced an antinociceptive effect, that was reversed by the administration of selective antagonists of serotoninergic receptors 5-HT1B isamoltan, 5-HT1D BRL15572, 5-HT2A ketanserin, 5-HT3 ondansetron, but not by selective receptor antagonist 5-HT7 SB-269970. The administration of escitalopram, a serotonin reuptake inhibitor, potentiated the antinociceptive effect at a submaximal dose of NA. These results, indicate the existence of synergism between the noradrenergic and serotonergic systems in peripheral antinociception in mice.


Subject(s)
Norepinephrine , Receptors, Serotonin , Serotonin Antagonists , Serotonin , Animals , Mice , Norepinephrine/metabolism , Serotonin/metabolism , Serotonin Antagonists/pharmacology , Male , Receptors, Serotonin/metabolism , Dinoprostone/metabolism , Citalopram/pharmacology , Nociception/drug effects , Analgesics/pharmacology , Ondansetron/pharmacology , Ketanserin/pharmacology , Pain/drug therapy , Pain/metabolism , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/pharmacology
11.
Transl Psychiatry ; 14(1): 241, 2024 Jun 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38844469

ABSTRACT

Ordinary sensations from inside the body are important causes and consequences of our affective states and behaviour, yet the roles of neurotransmitters in interoceptive processing have been unclear. With a within-subjects design, this experiment tested the impacts of acute increases of endogenous extracellular serotonin on the neural processing of attended internal sensations and the links of these effects to anxiety using a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) (20 mg CITALOPRAM) and a PLACEBO. Twenty-one healthy volunteers (fourteen female, mean age 23.9) completed the Visceral Interoceptive Attention (VIA) task while undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) with each treatment. The VIA task required focused attention on the heart, stomach, or visual sensation. The relative neural interoceptive responses to heart sensation [heart minus visual attention] (heart-IR) and stomach sensation [stomach minus visual attention] (stomach-IR) were compared between treatments. Visual attention subtraction controlled for the general effects of CITALOPRAM on sensory processing. CITALOPRAM was associated with lower interoceptive processing in viscerosensory (the stomach-IR of bilateral posterior insular cortex) and integrative/affective (the stomach-IR and heart-IR of bilateral amygdala) components of interoceptive neural pathways. In anterior insular cortex, CITALOPRAM reductions of heart-IR depended on anxiety levels, removing a previously known association between anxiety and the region's response to attended heart sensation observed with PLACEBO. Preliminary post hoc analysis indicated that CITALOPRAM effects on the stomach-IR of the amygdalae corresponded to acute anxiety changes. This direct evidence of general and anxiety-linked serotonergic influence on neural interoceptive processes advances our understanding of interoception, its regulation, and anxiety.


Subject(s)
Anxiety , Citalopram , Interoception , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors , Humans , Female , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/pharmacology , Male , Citalopram/pharmacology , Young Adult , Adult , Interoception/physiology , Interoception/drug effects , Anxiety/physiopathology , Attention/drug effects , Attention/physiology , Insular Cortex/diagnostic imaging , Insular Cortex/drug effects , Amygdala/drug effects , Amygdala/diagnostic imaging , Brain/diagnostic imaging , Brain/drug effects , Heart/drug effects
12.
Clin Transl Sci ; 17(6): e13822, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38860639

ABSTRACT

Specific selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) metabolism is strongly influenced by two pharmacogenes, CYP2D6 and CYP2C19. However, the effectiveness of prospectively using pharmacogenetic variants to select or dose SSRIs for depression is uncertain in routine clinical practice. The objective of this prospective, multicenter, pragmatic randomized controlled trial is to determine the effectiveness of genotype-guided selection and dosing of antidepressants on control of depression in participants who are 8 years or older with ≥3 months of depressive symptoms who require new or revised therapy. Those randomized to the intervention arm undergo pharmacogenetic testing at baseline and receive a pharmacy consult and/or automated clinical decision support intervention based on an actionable phenotype, while those randomized to the control arm have pharmacogenetic testing at the end of 6-months. In both groups, depression and drug tolerability outcomes are assessed at baseline, 1 month, 3 months (primary), and 6 months. The primary end point is defined by change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Depression score assessed at 3 months versus baseline. Secondary end points include change inpatient health questionnaire (PHQ-8) measure of depression severity, remission rates defined by PROMIS score < 16, medication adherence, and medication side effects. The primary analysis will compare the PROMIS score difference between trial arms among those with an actionable CYP2D6 or CYP2C19 genetic result or a CYP2D6 drug-drug interaction. The trial has completed accrual of 1461 participants, of which 562 were found to have an actionable phenotype to date, and follow-up will be complete in April of 2024.


Subject(s)
Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19 , Cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6 , Depression , Pharmacogenomic Testing , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors , Humans , Cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6/genetics , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19/genetics , Depression/drug therapy , Depression/genetics , Depression/diagnosis , Prospective Studies , Female , Male , Pharmacogenomic Variants , Adult , Pragmatic Clinical Trials as Topic , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Antidepressive Agents/administration & dosage , Antidepressive Agents/adverse effects
15.
Actas Esp Psiquiatr ; 52(3): 334-346, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38863057

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The use of antidepressants, especially selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), has been linked to adverse effects on bone health, but findings are conflicting. This study aimed to quantify the associations between newer antidepressants and bone mineral density (BMD) and fracture risk through a comprehensive meta-analysis. METHODS: Observational studies on the association between the use of novel antidepressants and BMD and hip fracture were systematically searched in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and Scopus. Random effects meta-analyses were conducted to pool results across the eligible studies. The heterogeneity, publication bias, and influence were assessed extensively. RESULTS: 14 eligible studies with 1,417,134 participants were identified. Antidepressant use was associated with significantly lower BMD compared to non-use at all skeletal sites examined, with pooled standardized mean differences (SMD) ranging from -0.02 (total hip) to -0.04 (femoral neck). Importantly, antidepressant use was associated with a 2.5-fold increased risk of hip fracture (pooled odds ratio (OR) 2.50, 95% CI 2.26-2.76). While heterogeneity was detected, the overall findings were robust in sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis provided strong evidence that novel antidepressants, especially widely used SSRIs, have detrimental impacts on bone health. The observed associations with decreased BMD and doubled hip fracture risk have important clinical implications.


Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents , Bone Density , Hip Fractures , Osteoporosis , Humans , Bone Density/drug effects , Antidepressive Agents/adverse effects , Osteoporosis/chemically induced , Osteoporosis/drug therapy , Hip Fractures/chemically induced , Hip Fractures/epidemiology , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/adverse effects , Osteoporotic Fractures/chemically induced , Osteoporotic Fractures/epidemiology , Risk Factors
17.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 13762, 2024 06 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38877103

ABSTRACT

Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI) therapy is common among perinatal populations for the treatment of mood disorders. Medications can affect diversity and composition of the gut microbiome, which plays a key role in modulating health. While previous studies have examined the effects of antidepressant exposure on the maternal gut microbiome, whether SSRI exposure affects the offspring gut microbiome is unknown. We investigated the effects of maternal fluoxetine exposure on the gut microbiome of maternal and offspring mice during pregnancy and lactation (embryonic day 10-lactation day 21; E10-L21). Stool samples collected on E17, L11, L15, and L21 were examined using 16S rRNA sequencing. Our results suggest that maternal fluoxetine exposure may result in decreased alpha diversity of the offspring gut microbiome in early life. Furthermore, we observed several genera-specific differences in the gut microbiome based on treatment, specifically of Turicibacter, Parasutterella, and Romboutsia. These findings support our understanding of gut health, as dysbiotic development of the gut microbiome has been associated with local and systemic health problems including gastrointestinal morbidities and interrupted growth patterns in infants. Future research should pursue study in human populations and those at high risk for gut microbial dysbiosis and intestinal injury.


Subject(s)
Fluoxetine , Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Lactation , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S , Animals , Gastrointestinal Microbiome/drug effects , Female , Pregnancy , Lactation/drug effects , Fluoxetine/pharmacology , Fluoxetine/adverse effects , Mice , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/genetics , Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects/microbiology , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/adverse effects , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/pharmacology , Feces/microbiology , Maternal Exposure/adverse effects , Bacteria/drug effects , Bacteria/classification , Bacteria/genetics , Bacteria/isolation & purification
18.
J Exp Biol ; 227(12)2024 Jun 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38842023

ABSTRACT

One of the most prevalent axes of behavioral variation in both humans and animals is risk taking, where individuals that are more willing to take risk are characterized as bold while those that are more reserved are regarded as shy. Brain monoamines (i.e. serotonin, dopamine and noradrenaline) have been found to play a role in a variety of behaviors related to risk taking. Using zebrafish, we investigated whether there was a relationship between monoamine function and boldness behavior during exploration of a novel tank. We found a correlation between serotonin metabolism (5-HIAA:5-HT ratio) and boldness during the initial exposure to the tank in female animals. The DOPAC:DA ratio correlated with boldness behavior on the third day in male fish. There was no relationship between boldness and noradrenaline. To probe differences in serotonergic function in bold and shy fish, we administered a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, escitalopram, and assessed exploratory behavior. We found that escitalopram had opposing effects on thigmotaxis in bold and shy female animals: the drug caused bold fish to spend more time near the center of the tank and shy fish spent more time near the periphery. Taken together, our findings indicate that variation in serotonergic function has sex-specific contributions to individual differences in risk-taking behavior.


Subject(s)
Individuality , Serotonin , Zebrafish , Animals , Zebrafish/physiology , Zebrafish/metabolism , Female , Serotonin/metabolism , Male , Exploratory Behavior/drug effects , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/pharmacology , Citalopram/pharmacology , Behavior, Animal/drug effects , Risk-Taking , Dopamine/metabolism , Hydroxyindoleacetic Acid/metabolism
19.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 13462, 2024 06 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38862591

ABSTRACT

There have been 774,075,242 cases of COVID-19 and 7,012,986 deaths worldwide as of January 2024. In the early stages of the pandemic, there was an urgent need to reduce the severity of the disease and prevent the need for hospitalization to avoid stress on healthcare systems worldwide. The repurposing of drugs to prevent clinical deterioration of COVID-19 patients was trialed in many studies using many different drugs. Fluvoxamine (an SSRI and sigma-1 receptor agonist) was initially identified to potentially provide beneficial effects in COVID-19-infected patients, preventing clinical deterioration and the need for hospitalization. Fourteen clinical studies have been carried out to date, with seven of those being randomized placebo-controlled studies. This systematic review and meta-analysis covers the literature from the outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 in late 2019 until January 2024. Search terms related to fluvoxamine, such as its trade names and chemical names, along with words related to COVID-19, such as SARS-CoV-2 and coronavirus, were used in literature databases including PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and the ClinicalTrials.gov database from NIH, to identify the trials used in the subsequent analysis. Clinical deterioration and death data were extracted from these studies where available and used in the meta-analysis. A total of 7153 patients were studied across 14 studies (both open-label and double-blind placebo-controlled). 681 out of 3553 (19.17%) in the standard care group and 255 out of 3600 (7.08%) in the fluvoxamine-treated group experienced clinical deterioration. The estimated average log odds ratio was 1.087 (95% CI 0.200 to 1.973), which differed significantly from zero (z = 2.402, p = 0.016). The seven placebo-controlled studies resulted in a log odds ratio of 0.359 (95% CI 0.1111 to 0.5294), which differed significantly from zero (z = 3.103, p = 0.002). The results of this study identified fluvoxamine as effective in preventing clinical deterioration, and subgrouping analysis suggests that earlier treatment with a dose of 200 mg or above provides the best outcomes. We hope the outcomes of this study can help design future studies into respiratory viral infections and potentially improve clinical outcomes.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , COVID-19 , Fluvoxamine , SARS-CoV-2 , Fluvoxamine/therapeutic use , Humans , COVID-19/mortality , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , SARS-CoV-2/drug effects , Treatment Outcome , Clinical Deterioration , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/adverse effects , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/administration & dosage
20.
Pharmazie ; 79(3): 82-90, 2024 May 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38872268

ABSTRACT

Background and aim: Prescription patterns of antidepressants have changed over the years with a shift towards newer antidepressants with better tolerability and safety. Polypharmacy is common in psychiatry settings. The study aimed to evaluate the antidepressant drug prescription pattern and polypharmacy in a psychiatry outpatient setting. Investigations: This prospective observational study was conducted in a psychiatric outpatient clinic. The medication use data of eligible patients were collected. In addition, the rationale of antidepressant medication prescription, the defined daily dosage (DDD), the prescribed daily dose (PDD), and the PDD to DDD ratio were assessed. The assessment of prescription polypharmacy was conducted utilizing the framework provided by the National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors. Results: Data from 131 patients was analyzed. Major depressive disorder (32.8%) was the most common disorder for which antidepressants were prescribed. The majority, 91 (69.4%), received monotherapy. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors were the most frequently prescribed drugs in 69 (52.7%). Mirtazapine was the most frequently 32(24.4%) prescribed drug. Escitalopram and mirtazapine were the most commonly prescribed combination therapy (4.6%). Antipsychotic medications (37.4%) were the most widely co-prescribed medications, along with antidepressants. The PDD to DDD ratio was less than 1 for mirtazapine and imipramine; they were ≥1 for others. Psychiatric polypharmacy was documented in 87.1% of prescriptions. The total polypharmacy was not significantly (p>0.05) associated with demographic, illness, and treatment-related variables. Conclusion: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors were the most commonly prescribed antidepressants, monotherapy, and combination therapy. A substantial amount of patients received concomitant administration of antidepressants or psychotropic drugs, warranting careful monitoring.


Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents , Outpatients , Polypharmacy , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Humans , Antidepressive Agents/administration & dosage , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Male , Female , Prospective Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Adult , Mental Disorders/drug therapy , Drug Therapy, Combination , Drug Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Depressive Disorder, Major/drug therapy , Aged , Antipsychotic Agents/administration & dosage , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Young Adult , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/therapeutic use
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...