Surgically managed symptomatic intraspinal lumbar facet synovial cyst outcome of surgical treatment with resection and instrumented posterolateral fusion, a case series.

BACKGROUND: There is controversy regarding the treatment of symptomatic synovial cysts, specifically, the need for a concomitant fusion when surgical resection of the synovial cysts is required. We present a retrospective review of a series of patients treated for symptomatic synovial cysts of the lumbar region during the last 20 years by a single surgeon, analyzing the current available literature. METHODS: Retrospective review. The same surgical technique was applied to all patients. Demographic, clinical, surgical data and synovial cyst recurrence rate were recorded. Postoperative results reported by patients were documented according to the McNab score. RESULTS: Sixty nine subjects, with mean follow-up of 7.4 years. 62% (43) were female, with a mean 57.8 years at the time of surgery. In 91.3% (63), the primary management was conservative for a minimum period of 3 months. All subjects underwent surgery due to the failure of conservative treatment. The segment most operated on was L4-L5 (63.77%). 91.3% (63) of the sample reported excellent and good and 6 subjects (8.6%) fair or poor results. There was no evidence of synovial cysts recurrence at the operated level. CONCLUSION: In symptomatic synovial cysts, it seems that conservative treatment is only effective in a limited number of patients and in the short term. Thus, the recommendation of a surgical indication should proceed as soon as the conservative management fails to result in significant symptom relief. Based on our results, we recommend, together with the resection of the cyst, the instrumentation of the segment to avoid its recurrence and the management of axial pain.

Does Postoperative Spine Infection Bacterial Gram Type Affect Surgical Debridement or Antibiotic Duration?

STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to evaluate differences in readmission rates, number of debridements, and length of antibiotic therapy when comparing bacterial gram type following lumbar spinal fusion infections. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Surgical site infections (SSIs) after spinal fusion serve as a significant source of patient morbidity. It remains to be elucidated how bacterial classification of the infecting organism affects the management of postoperative spinal SSI. METHODS: Patients who underwent spinal fusion with a subsequent diagnosis of SSI between 2013 and 2019 were retrospectively identified. Patients were grouped based on bacterial infection type (gram-positive, gram-negative, or mixed infections). Poisson regressions analyzed the relationship between the type of bacterial infection and the number of irrigation and debridement (I&D) reoperations, and the duration of intravenous (IV) antibiotic therapy. Significance was set at P <0.05. RESULTS: Of 190 patients, 92 had gram-positive (G+) infections, 57 had gram-negative (G-) infections, and 33 had mixed (M) infections. There was no difference in 30 or 90-day readmissions for infection between groups (both P =0.051). Patients in the M group had longer durations of IV antibiotic treatment (G+: 46.4 vs. G-: 41.0 vs. M: 55.9 d, P =0.002). Regression analysis demonstrated mixed infections were 46% more likely to require a greater number of debridements ( P =0.001) and 18% more likely to require an increased duration of IV antibiotic therapy ( P <0.001), while gram-negative infections were 10% less likely to require an increased duration of IV antibiotic therapy ( P <0.001) when compared with G- infections. CONCLUSION: Spinal SSI due to a mixed bacterial gram type results in an increased number of debridements and a longer duration of IV antibiotics required to resolve the infection compared with gram-negative or gram-positive infections. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Depression Increases Posterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion Revision Rates and Diminishes Neck Disability Index Improvement.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To determine if depression and/or anxiety significantly affect patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Mental health diagnoses are receiving increased recognition for their influence of outcomes after spine surgery. The magnitude that mental health disorders contribute to patient-reported outcomes following PCDF requires increased awareness and understanding. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A review of electronic medical records identified patients who underwent a PCDF at a single institution during the years 2013-2020. Patients were placed into either depression/anxiety or nondepression/anxiety group based on their medical history. A delta score (∆) was calculated for all PROMs by subtracting postoperative from preoperative scores. χ 2 tests and t tests were utilized to analyze categorical and continuous data, respectively. Regression analysis determined independent predictors of change in PROMs. Alpha was set at 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 195 patients met inclusion criteria, with 60 (30.8%) having a prior diagnosis of depression/anxiety. The depression/anxiety group was younger (58.8 vs . 63.0, P =0.012), predominantly female (53.3% vs . 31.9%, P =0.007), and more frequently required revision surgery (11.7% vs . 0.74%, P =0.001). In addition, they had worse baseline mental component (MCS-12) (42.2 vs . 48.6, P <0.001), postoperative MCS-12 (46.5 vs . 52.9, P =0.002), postoperative neck disability index (NDI) (40.7 vs . 28.5, P =0.001), ∆NDI (-1.80 vs . -8.93, P =0.010), NDI minimum clinically important difference improvement (15.0% vs . 29.6%, P =0.046), and postoperative Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Neck scores (3.63 vs . 2.48, P =0.018). Only the nondepression/anxiety group improved in MCS-12 ( P =0.002) and NDI ( P <0.001) postoperatively. Depression and/or anxiety was an independent predictor of decreased magnitude of NDI improvement on regression analysis (ß=7.14, P =0.038). CONCLUSION: Patients with history of depression or anxiety demonstrate less improvement in patient-reported outcomes and a higher revision rate after posterior cervical fusion, highlighting the importance of mental health on clinical outcomes after spine surgery.

HIV and Surgery for Degenerative Spine Disease: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The objective of this review is to evaluate the incidence of operative treatment, outcomes, and complications of surgery for degenerative spine disease (DSD) on human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive patients. Combined antiretroviral treatment led HIV patients to live long enough to develop many chronic conditions common in the uninfected population. Surgery for DSD is one of the most commonly performed neurosurgical procedures. However, the incidence of spine surgery for DSD in HIV-positive patients seems to be lower than that in uninfected individuals, although this has not been clearly determined. METHODS: A systematic search of the Medline, Web of Science, Embase, and SciElo databases was conducted. Only primary studies addressing DSD surgery on HIV-positive patients were included. Evaluated variables were rates of surgical treatment, surgical outcomes and complications, year of publication, country where study was conducted, type of study, and level of evidence. RESULTS: Six articles were included in the review from 1,108 records. Significantly lower rates of DSD surgery were identified in HIV-infected patients (0.86 per 1,000 patient-years) when compared with uninfected patients (1.41 per 1,000 patient-years). There was a significant increase in spinal surgery in HIV-positive patients over time, with a 0.094 incidence per 100,000 in the year 2000 and 0.303 in 2009. HIV-positive patients had very similar outcomes when compared with controls, with 66.6% presenting pain relief at a 3-month follow-up. Higher incidences of hospital mortality (1.6 vs. 0.3%; p < 0.001) and complications (12.2 vs. 9.5%, p < 0.001) were observed in HIV carriers. CONCLUSIONS: HIV-positive individuals appear to undergo less surgery for DSD than HIV-negative individuals. Improvement rates appear to be similar in both groups, even though some complications appear to be more prevalent in HIV carriers. Larger studies are needed for decisive evidence on the subject.

Infusión intravenosa de ketamina a bajas dosis durante cirugía de artrodesis de columna. Una estrategia en el manejo del dolor agudo posoperatorio / Intravenous ketamine infusión at low doses during spinal arthodesis surgery. A strategy in acute postoperative pain management

INTRODUCTION: Acute postoperative pain is a complex problem given the pathophysiological characteristics, increasing health costs and complications and hindering recovery[1],[2]. Spinal arthrodesis is one of the most painful surgical procedures, presenting intense and disabling pain[3],[4]. Multimodal analgesia has been the tool with the best results, based on opioids; however, the combined use of drugs and dependence on opiates are important consequences. Therefore, the analgesic behavior during the use of subanesthetic doses of ketamine is described in the patients undergoing this procedure. METHODOLOGY: A prospective case series study was conducted from January-December 2019, with patients undergoing spinal arthrodesis who met the inclusion criteria, at the Hernando Moncaleano Perdomo University Hospital, Neiva. A univariate statistical analysis of all the variables is performed, with a joint interpretation of the results. RESULTS: A total of 17 patients underwent surgery, one of whom was excluded due to complications related to the surgical material. 88% of the patients showed evaluations of mild or absent pain in at least 4 times, with a number of morphine rescues in 24 hours of 1-2 per patient and patient ambulation in 90% on the first day. CONCLUSIONS. Postoperative spinal arthrodesis patients receiving intravenous ketamine infusion-based analgesia at subanesthetic doses showed mild or absent pain scores at almost all times.

INTRODUCCIÓN: El dolor agudo postoperatorio es un problema complejo dada las características fisiopatológicas, aumentando los costos en salud y las complicaciones y dificultando la recuperación[1],[2]. La artrodesis de columna, es uno de los procedimientos quirúrgicos más dolorosos, presentando un dolor intenso e incapacitante[3],[4]. La analgesia multimodal ha sido la herramienta con mejores resultados, tomando como base los opioides; sin embargo, el uso combinado de fármacos y la dependencia a opiáceos son consecuencias importantes. Por lo anterior, se describe el comportamiento analgésico durante el uso de dosis subanestésicas de ketamina en los pacientes llevados a dicho procedimiento. METODOLOGÍA: Se realiza un estudio tipo serie de casos, prospectivo de enero-diciembre de 2019, con los pacientes llevados a artrodesis de columna que cumplieron con los criterios de inclusión en el Hospital Universitario Hernando Moncaleano Perdomo, Neiva. Se realiza un análisis estadístico univariado de la totalidad de las variables, con una interpretación conjunta de los resultados. RESULTADOS: Se intervinieron un total de 17 pacientes, uno de los cuales fue excluido por complicaciones relacionadas con el material quirúrgico. El 88% de los pacientes mostraron valoraciones de dolor leve o ausente en al menos 4 tiempos, con número de rescates de morfina en 24 h de 1-2 por paciente y deambulación de los pacientes en el 90% en el primer día. CONCLUSIONES: Los pacientes posoperatorios de artrodesis de columna que recibieron analgesia basada en infusión endovenosa de ketamina a dosis subanestésicas mostraron valoraciones de dolor leve o ausente, en casi todos los tiempos.

Undisclosed Conflict of Interest Is Prevalent in Spine Literature.

STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the rate of accurate conflict of interest (COI) disclosure within three prominent subspecialty Spine journals during a 4-year period. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Industry-physician relationships are crucial for technological advancement in spine surgery but serve as a source of bias in biomedical research. The Open Payments Database (OPD) was established after 2010 to increase financial transparency. METHODS: All research articles published from 2014 to 2017 in Spine, The Spine Journal (TSJ), and the Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine (JNS) were reviewed in this study. In these articles, all author's COI statements were recorded. The OPD was queried for all author entries within the disclose period of the journal. Discrepancies between the author's self-reported COIs and the documented COIs from OPD were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 6816 articles meeting inclusion criteria between 2014 and 2017 in Spine, TSJ, and JNS with 39,869 contributing authors. Overall, 15.8% of all authors were found to have an OPD financial relationship. Of 2633 authors in Spine with financial disclosures, 77.1% had accurate financial disclosures; 42.5% and 41.0% of authors with financial relationships in the OPD had accurate financial disclosures in TSJ and JNS, respectively. The total value of undisclosed conflicts of interest between 2014 and 2017 was $421 million with $1.48 billion in accurate disclosures. Of undisclosed payments, 68.7% were <$1000 and only 7.2% were >$10,000. Undisclosed payments included $180 million in research funding and $188 million in royalties. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that undisclosed COI is highly prevalent for authors in major Spine journals. This study indicates that there remains a need to standardize definitions and financial thresholds for significant COI as well as to shift the reporting burden for COI to journals who actively review potential COIs instead of relying on self-reporting. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Correlation Between Different Interbody Grafts and Pseudarthrosis After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Compared with Control Group: Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Cervical spine degenerative disease is one of the main causes of myelopathy. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is the most common surgical procedure used to treat cervical myelopathy. Therefore, it is important to study pseudarthrosis rates after ACDF and correlate them with the graft used. METHODS: We performed a systematic review to evaluate the relationship between pseudarthrosis after ACDF and the interbody graft used. RESULTS: A total of 3732 patients were evaluated in 46 studies. The mean age of the included patients was 51.5 ± 4.18 years (range, 42-59.6 years). ACDF is most often perforemd as single-level surgery and the level most impaired is C5-C6. The use of titanium cages, zero profile, recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2, and carbon cages was seen as a protective factor for pseudarthrosis compared with the autograft group (control group); with an odds ratio of 0.29, 0.51, 0.03, and 0.3, respectively; the results were statistically relevant. The use of polyetheretherketone, poly(methyl methacrylate), and trabecular metal was a risk factor for development of pseudarthrosis compared with the control group, with an odds ratio of 1.7, 8.7, and 6.8, respectively; the results were statistically relevant. Radiologic follow-up was an important factor for the pseudarthrosis rate; paradoxically, a short follow-up (<1 year) had lower rates of pseudarthrosis and follow-up >2 years increased the chance of finding pseudarthrosis. CONCLUSIONS: Different types of grafts lead to a significant difference in pseudarthrosis rates. Follow-up time is also an important factor that affects the rate of pseudarthrosis after ACDF.

Wearable Technology in Spine Surgery.

Although patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) provide valuable insight into the effectiveness of spine surgery, there still remain limitations on measuring outcomes in this manner. Among other deficiencies, PROMs do not always correlate with more objective measures of surgery success. Wearable technology, such as pedometers, tri-axis accelerometer, or wearable cameras, may allow physicians to track patient progress following spine surgery more objectively. Recently, there has been an emphasis on using wearable devices to measure physical activity and limb and spine function. Wearable devices could play an important role as a supplement to PROMs, although they might have to be substantiated through adequate controlled studies to identify normative data for patients presenting with common spine disorders. This review will detail the current state of wearable technology applications in spine surgery and its direction as its utilization expands.

Successful medical drainage and surgical treatment for vertebral osteomyelitis and bilateral psoas abscess with gas formation caused by klebsiella pneumoniae in a diabetic patient.

OBJECTIVE: We describe the case of a diabetic patient who developed vertebral osteomyelitis and bilateral psoas abscess with gas formation due to klebsiella pneumoniae. METHODS: A 64-year-old woman with a 4-year history of type-2 diabetes mellitus was admitted to the Emergency Department. The subject had a 2-day history of high-grade fever associated with chills and a 5-hour history of consciousness. She received empirical treatment with febrifuge, after which her fever decreased. RESULTS: Her fever recurred after an interval of three hours. A computed tomography scan of the abdomen revealed vertebral osteomyelitis and bilateral psoas muscle abscess with gas formation. Blood culture and purulent fluid described the growth of the Klebsiella pneumoniae. The patient received antibiotic therapy and bilateral drainage therapy after the drainage catheter was placed into the abscess cavity by CT-guidance. Due to the serious damage to the vertebral column and permanent pain, the patient underwent minimally invasive internal spinal fixation and recovered successfully. CONCLUSION: A case of vertebral osteomyelitis and bilateral psoas abscess with gas formation caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae in a diabetic patient. Antibiotic therapy, drainage, and minimally invasive internal spinal fixation were performed, which enabled a good outcome.

Manejo del dolor posoperatorio por cirugía de columna en la población pediátrica: Resultados preliminares / Pain management following spinal surgeries in pediatric patients. Preliminary results

Introducción: Aproximadamente el 80% de los pacientes pediátricos sometidos a cirugía de columna refiere dolor moderado o severo en el posoperatorio inmediato. Objetivos: Describir la presencia de dolor y su intensidad durante el posoperatorio de una cirugía de columna en pacientes pediátricos y evaluar la eficacia del tratamiento analgésico actual. Materiales y Métodos: Se evaluaron pacientes sometidos a cirugía de columna, de entre 10 y 18 años, con capacidad mental para entender el propósito del estudio. Se utilizó el esquema de medicación estándar actual posoperatorio del hospital. Se constataron la presencia del dolor, la hora de comienzo, la localización y la intensidad (escala de valoración numérica), entre otras variables. Resultados: Se evaluó a 84 pacientes pediátricos, con una edad promedio de 12 años y 9 meses, al momento de la cirugía. Las etiología fueron: idiopática (41 casos), neuropática (14 casos), sindrómica (10 casos), muscular (7 casos) y misceláneas (12 casos). El puntaje promedio en la escala de valoración numérica fue de 2,1 antes de la cirugía; de 7,3 el día 1 posoperatorio y de 3,3 el día 6 posoperatorio/alta. El tiempo promedio de internación fue de 6.3 días, el costo económico global de la internación fue de USD1090 por paciente. Conclusiones: Un importante porcentaje de pacientes pediátricos refiere dolor moderado o severo en el posoperatorio de una cirugía de columna, tan solo la mitad recibe un esquema de manejo de dolor estandarizado y adecuado. El objetivo ulterior de este estudio será protocolizar el manejo del dolor con un enfoque multimodal. Nivel de Evidencia: III

Introduction: Around 80% of pediatric patients who undergo spine surgery report moderate to severe pain in the immediate postoperative (POP) period, and only half of them are treated according to an adequate and standardized pain management scheme. Objectives: To describe the type and intensity of POP pain in children who underwent spinal surgery and evaluate the effectiveness of the current pain management protocol. Materials and Methods: We assessed children between 10 and 18 years of age who were able to understand the purpose of the study. We recorded presence of pain, time of POP pain onset, location, and referred intensity of the pain using a numeric rating scale (NRS), among other variables. Results: Overall, 84 pediatric patients were evaluated. Mean age at surgery: 12 years and 9 months. Etiology: idiopathic (41 patients), neuropathic (14 patients), syndromic (10 patients), muscular (7 patients), and miscellaneous (12 patients). Mean preoperative NRS was 2.1 and 7.3 on POP day 1, 6.6 on POP day 2, 6.2 on POP day 3, 5.1 on POP day 4, 3.7 on POP day 5, and 3.3 on POP day 6/at discharge. Mean hospital stay was 6.3 days. The mean cost of hospital stay was USD 1090 per patient. Conclusions: A high percentage of pediatric patients who underwent spinal surgery reported moderate to severe pain in the POP period, and just half of them received a standardized pain management protocol. A pain management protocol with a multimodal focus should be considered in a near future. Level of Evidence: III

Successful medical drainage and surgical treatment for vertebral osteomyelitis and bilateral psoas abscess with gas formation caused by klebsiella pneumoniae in a diabetic patient

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: We describe the case of a diabetic patient who developed vertebral osteomyelitis and bilateral psoas abscess with gas formation due to klebsiella pneumoniae. METHODS: A 64-year-old woman with a 4-year history of type-2 diabetes mellitus was admitted to the Emergency Department. The subject had a 2-day history of high-grade fever associated with chills and a 5-hour history of consciousness. She received empirical treatment with febrifuge, after which her fever decreased. RESULTS: Her fever recurred after an interval of three hours. A computed tomography scan of the abdomen revealed vertebral osteomyelitis and bilateral psoas muscle abscess with gas formation. Blood culture and purulent fluid described the growth of the Klebsiella pneumoniae. The patient received antibiotic therapy and bilateral drainage therapy after the drainage catheter was placed into the abscess cavity by CT-guidance. Due to the serious damage to the vertebral column and permanent pain, the patient underwent minimally invasive internal spinal fixation and recovered successfully. CONCLUSION: A case of vertebral osteomyelitis and bilateral psoas abscess with gas formation caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae in a diabetic patient. Antibiotic therapy, drainage, and minimally invasive internal spinal fixation were performed, which enabled a good outcome.

RESUMO OBJETIVO: Descrever o caso de uma paciente diabética que desenvolveu osteomielite vertebral e abcesso bilateral do psoas com formação de gás causada por klebsiella pneumoniae. MÉTODOS: Uma mulher de 64 anos de idade, com 4 anos de histórico de diabetes mellitus tipo 2, foi admitida no Serviço de Emergência. A paciente apresentava um quadro de dias de febre alta acompanhada de calafrios e um histórico de 5 horas de consciência. Ela recebeu tratamento empírico com antitérmico, após o qual a febre diminuiu. RESULTADOS: A febre retornou após um intervalo de três horas. Uma tomografia computadorizada do abdome revelou osteomielite vertebral e abcesso bilateral do músculo psoas com formação de gás. A cultura do sangue e o fluido purulento revelaram o crescimento de Klebsiella pneumoniae. A paciente recebeu antibióticos e terapia de drenagem bilateral após o cateter de drenagem ser posicionado na cavidade do abscesso com auxílio de TC. Devido a sérios danos à coluna vertebral e a dor permanente, a paciente foi submetida à fixação vertebral interna minimamente invasiva e recuperou-se com sucesso. CONCLUSÃO: Um caso de osteomielite vertebral e abscesso do psoas bilateral com a formação de gás causada por Klebsiella pneumoniae em uma paciente diabética. Antibioticoterapia, drenagem e fixação vertebral interna minimamente invasiva foram realizadas, o que permitiu um bom resultado.

Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Methodology - Minimally Invasive Compared to Screw-Type Surgeries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Sacroiliac (SI) joint fusion represents a unique area of orthopedic surgery with procedural literature dating to the early 1920s, showing limited innovation in either technique or hardware over the last 90 years. Recent improvements in the diagnosis and treatment of SI joint dysfunction warrant comparisons to older surgical techniques. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate treatment efficacies and patient outcomes associated with minimally invasive joint fusion in comparison to screw-type surgeries. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. SETTING: Electronic databases, EMBASE, Pubmed (Medline), manual bibliography cross-referencing for published works until Dec. 31, 2017. METHODS: A thorough literature search was performed in adherence to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology. Data repositories accessed included Pubmed and EMBASE, until Dec. 31, 2017. All studies evaluating sacroiliac joint fusion and reporting quantifiable outcome data were included. Exclusion criteria included nonhuman studies, qualitative reviews, and meta-analyses. Data compilation, coding, and extraction were performed using MedAware Systems proprietary software. Data from each study were extracted by 2 analysts, using software that allowed automatic comparisons of all data fields. The standardized mean difference (SMD) was used as a summary statistic for pooling outcomes data across studies. Multiple outcome measures were grouped into 3 categories, according to similarity of measurements - Pain, Disability/Physical Function, and Global/QOL. RESULTS: A total of 20 studies had adequate data to calculate a SMD, and were included in the meta-analysis. Results of iFuse trials were compared to screw type trials, pooled in 3 categories of outcomes - Pain, Disability/Physical Function, and Global/QOL. The Pain category showed a statistically significant (P = 0.03) difference in outcomes for patients receiving the iFuse implant compared to screw types (SMD = 2.04 [95%CI: 1.76 to 2.33] vs. 1.28 [95%CI: 0.47 to 2.09]), with iFuse showing significantly better outcomes. The Disability category also showed a statistically significant (P = 0.01) difference in outcomes for patients receiving the iFuse implant compared to screw types (SMD = 1.68 [95%CI: 1.43 to 1.94] vs. 0.26 [95%CI: -1.90 to 2.41]), with iFuse showing significantly better outcomes. For Global/Quality of Life (QOL) outcomes, there was a significant difference (P = 0.04) between iFuse and screw-type procedures (SMD = 0.99 [95%CI: 0.75 to 1.24] vs. 0.60 [95%CI: 0.33 to 0.88]), with iFuse showing significantly better outcomes. There was a statistically significant correlation between lower baseline Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) values and better post treatment outcomes (r2 = 0.47, P < 0.01, and r2 = 0.30, P < 0.01, respectively). An association was found between pain at baseline and better outcomes (r2 = 0.21, P < 0.01), where worse baseline pain was associated with better outcomes. LIMITATIONS: There was a limited number of studies in this meta-analysis with treatments that could be properly classified as screw-type. CONCLUSION: In this analysis, compared to screw-type surgeries, the iFuse system showed statistically superior outcomes. This was the case when outcome measures were classified into 3 main categories - Pain, Disability/Physical Function, and Global/QOL. KEY WORDS: Meta-analysis, systematic review, sacroiliac joint, sacroiliac joint fusion.

Intraoperative vancomycin powder and post-operative infection after spinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

SUMMARY

Lasers in Spine Surgery.

Laser spine surgery has been a focus of intense interest in the lay press and among patients. On the Internet, a host of purported benefits to laser surgery exists. Lasers have long been used in pain management procedures such as percutaneous diskectomy. However, a few published articles are available on lasers in conventional spine surgery. From our review of the literature, the purported advantages of lasers, such as reduced inflammation and degeneration, are not been supported by preclinical research. The available clinical studies do not show a notable advantage for laser surgery. Moreover, the low enrollment, nonblinded, retrospective studies that are available are heavily subject to bias. The documented advantages of laser spine surgery described in the research studies are not consistent with the public's impression of its purported benefits. Furthermore, laser-specific complications are present about which patients should be informed. On the basis of the current research, we conclude that lasers add distinct potential complications without any corresponding clinical benefit. Because of the public interest, we feel that this is an important topic for the general orthopaedic community.

Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring in Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic literature review and meta-analysis. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this systematic literature review was to evaluate if intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) can prevent neurological injury during spinal operative surgical procedures. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: IONM seems to have presumable positive effects in identifying neurological deficits. However, the role of IONM in the decrease of new neurological deficits remains unclear. METHODS: Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for systematic reviews and Meta-analysis, we reviewed clinical comparative studies who evaluate the rate of new neurological events in patients who had a spinal surgery with and without IONM. Studies were then classified according to their level of evidence. Methodological quality was assessed according to methodological index for non-randomized studies instrument. RESULTS: Six studies were evaluated comparing neurological events with and without IONM use by the random effects model. There was a great statistical heterogeneity. The pooled odds ratio (OR) was 0.72 {0.71; 1.79}, P = 0.4584. A specific analysis was done for two studies reporting the results of IONM for spinal surgery of intramedullary lesions. The OR was 0.1993 (0.0384; 1.0350), P = 0.0550. CONCLUSION: IONM did not result into fewer neurological events with the obtained evidence of the included studies. For intramedullary lesions, there was a trend to fewer neurological events in patients who underwent surgery with IONM. Further prospective randomized studies are necessary to clarify the indications of IONM in spinal surgeries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.

Incidence of the adjacent segment disease treated at the issemym medical center / Incidência da doença do segmento adjacente tratada no centro médico issemym / Incidencia de la enfermedad del segmento adyacente tratada en el centro médico issemym

ABSTRACT Objective: To determine the incidence and rate of disc degeneration adjacent to a lumbar fusion, as well as to analyze possible risk factors for its development. Methods: A retrospective study of a level of evidence IIB case series of 125 patients diagnosed with lumbar canal stenosis and spondylolisthesis, who underwent surgery from January 2011 to December 2016, with subsequent instrumentation and posterolateral fusion and outpatient follow-up in which the symptomatology and radiographic findings were evaluated to establish the diagnosis and management. Results: Twelve patients with adjacent segment disease were identified, with an incidence of 9.6%, higher both among female patients and in the seventh decade of life. The most frequent pathology was canal stenosis (42.4%), the most affected level was L4 / L5, and the procedure most associated with the prevalence of adjacent level degeneration was L4-L5 posterior transpedicular instrumentation. Conclusions: Sagittalization of the facet joint was a constant factor in all patients with involvement of the adjacent disc. The main clinical findings were treatment-resistant root pain and radiographic alterations characterized by spondylolisthesis, facet osteoarthritis and intervertebral disc herniation. Level of Evidence IIB; Retrospective study.

RESUMO Objetivo: Determinar a incidência e a taxa de degeneração do disco adjacente, bem como analisar possíveis fatores de risco de degeneração do disco adjacente à fusão lombar. Métodos: Foi realizado um estudo retrospectivo de série de casos com nível de evidência IIB, com uma amostra de 125 pacientes com diagnóstico de estenose de canal lombar e espondilolistese, que foram operados no período de janeiro de 2011 a dezembro de 2016, com instrumentação posterior e fusão posterolateral e acompanhamento ambulatorial, no qual se avaliou a sintomatologia e os achados radiográficos para estabelecer o diagnóstico e o tratamento. Resultados: Foram identificados 12 pacientes com doença do segmento adjacente, com incidência de 9,6%, com maior frequência no sexo feminino e na sétima década de vida. A patologia mais frequente foi estenose do canal (42,4%). O nível mais afetado foi L4/L5, e o procedimento mais relacionado com a prevalência do nível adjacente foi a instrumentação transpedicular posterior em L4/L5. Conclusões: A sagitalização das facetas articulares tem sido um fator constante em todos os pacientes, com envolvimento do disco adjacente. Os principais achados clínicos são dor radicular resistente ao tratamento e alterações radiográficas caracterizadas por espondilolistese, artrose facetária e hérnia de disco intervertebral. Nível de Evidência IIB; Estudo retrospectivo.

RESUMEN Objetivo: Determinar la incidencia y tasa de degeneración del disco adyacente, así como analizar posibles factores de riesgo de desarrollar degeneración del disco adyacente a una fusión lumbar. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio retrospectivo de serie de casos con nivel de Evidencia IIB, con una muestra de 125 pacientes con diagnósticos de canal lumbar estrecho y espondilolistesis, intervenidos quirúrgicamente en el periodo de enero del 2011 a diciembre del 2016, con instrumentación posterior y fusión posterolateral, con seguimiento en consulta externa en el cual se evaluó la sintomatología y hallazgos radiográficos para establecer el diagnóstico y manejo. Resultados: Se identificaron 12 pacientes con enfermedad del segmento adyacente. Con una incidencia de 9,6%, con mayor incidencia en el sexo femenino y mayor incidencia en la séptima década de la vida. La patología más frecuente ha sido la estenosis de canal (42,4%). El nivel de mayor afectación fue en L4/L5, y el procedimiento más relacionado con la prevalencia de nivel adyacente fue la instrumentación posterior transpedicular L4/L5. Conclusiones: La sagitalización de las facetas articulares ha sido un factor constante en todos los pacientes, con afectación del disco adyacente. Los principales hallazgos clínicos son dolor radicular resistente al tratamiento y alteraciones radiográficas caracterizadas por espondilolistesis, artrosis facetaria y hernia de disco intervertebral. Nivel de Evidencia IIB; Estudio retrospectivo.

Descriptive Analysis of State and Federal Spine Surgery Malpractice Litigation in the United States.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the factors associated with malpractice litigation in cases involving spine surgery in the United States. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Medical malpractice is of substantial interest to the medical community due to concerns of increased health care costs and medical decision-making for the sole purpose of reducing legal liability. METHODS: The Westlaw online legal database (Thomson Reuters, New York, NY) was searched for verdict and settlement reports pertaining to spine surgery from 2010 to 2015. Data were collected regarding type of procedure, patient age and gender, defendant specialty, outcome, award, alleged cause of malpractice, and factors involved in the plaintiff's decision to file. Initial search queried 187 cases, after which exclusion criteria were applied to eliminate duplicates and cases unrelated to spine surgery, yielding a total of 98 cases for analysis. RESULTS: The verdict was in favor of the defendant in 62 cases (63.3%). Neurosurgeons and orthopedic surgeons were the most common defendants in 29 (17.3%) and 40 (23.8%) of the cases, respectively. A perceived lack of informed consent was noted as a factor in 24 (24.4%) of the cases. A failure to diagnose or a failure to treat was noted in 31 (31.6%) and 32 (32.7%) cases, respectively. Median payments for plaintiff verdicts were nearly double those of settlements ($2,525,000 vs. $1,300,000). A greater incidence of plaintiff verdicts was noted in cases in which a failure to treat (P < 0.05) was cited, a patient death occurred (P < 0.05), or an emergent surgery had been performed (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Overall, physicians were not found liable in the majority of spine surgery malpractice cases queried. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.