ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Infertility increases women's risk of intimate partner violence (IPV). Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is commonly used to treat mental health problems among fertility treatment seeking patients. CBT has not been tested for its potential to reduce IPV in this population. We pilot test the use of CBT to prevent IPV and improve patients' mental health in a fertility clinic in Jordan. METHODS: Of 38 eligible fertility-treatment seeking couples, 16 consented and underwent up to 11 CBT sessions (average = 9) over 3 months. Interviews at baseline and 16 weeks post intervention (endline) assessed IPV, quality of life, social support, coping, and fear of spouse. Wilcoxon signed-rank and McNemar's tests were used to assess change in outcomes. RESULTS: At baseline, women's rates of IPV, depression, and anxiety were 75%, 87.5%, and 75% respectively, whereas men's rates of depression and anxiety were each 80%. Average baseline post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms for men and women were 3.3 and 2.7 respectively out of 5. IPV decreased 25% after treatment, and women reported less spousal fear. For both men and women, depression, anxiety, and PTSD symptoms decreased and social support and fertility quality of life improved. CONCLUSION: Psychosocial support should be standard of care for the treatment of infertility given the burden of mental health problems and IPV and the utility of CBT in this patient population. Co-design with couples is needed to identify strategies to bolster participation along with population-based interventions to combat the stigma of infertility and mental health service use and enhance women's status.
Subject(s)
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy , Intimate Partner Violence , Mental Health , Quality of Life , Humans , Female , Adult , Pilot Projects , Jordan , Male , Intimate Partner Violence/psychology , Intimate Partner Violence/prevention & control , Intimate Partner Violence/statistics & numerical data , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/therapy , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/prevention & control , Depression/therapy , Depression/prevention & control , Anxiety/prevention & control , Anxiety/therapy , Infertility/therapy , Infertility/psychology , Social SupportABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Following the onset of the "Iron Swords" war, Israel's National Emergency Medical Organization Magen David Adom (MDA) implemented a program designed to prevent post-traumatic sequelae among its teams. 'Team debriefing' is at the core of the program, which also includes primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention carried out regularly to preclude psychological harm to employees and volunteers. Apart from the initial team debriefings, MDA's enhanced prevention program includes several other components and stages. Beginning on October 9, 2023, potentially traumatized teams met with senior mental health professionals: a refresher course on how to conduct debriefing sessions was offered to assist managers and senior staff to plan for appropriate prevention responses. Personal follow-ups were enacted by MDA's Human Resources Department for all team members living in southern Israel and others who took part in operations there when the war first broke out. Periodic team discussions were held for potentially traumatized staff and volunteers with senior mental health professionals. Meetings with senior mental health professionals via two modes of video conferencing were conducted: specialized meetings with at-risk teams and open meetings for the entire organization in the webinar format. A centralized referral system was expanded for assessment and immediate treatment, if necessary, by mental health professionals for employees and volunteers in need. We trust that these measures will enhance the operational readiness of the MDA staff and volunteers in the face of their increased workloads and the associated psychological pressures. We are convinced that the prompt implementation of a debriefing strategy within our organization cultivates resilience and confidence in the MDA teams, promotes a sense of togetherness among the personnel, and advances a state of readiness and operational alert.
Subject(s)
Emergency Responders , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic , Humans , Israel , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/prevention & control , Emergency Responders/psychology , WarfareABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: G1 is a specific agonist of G protein-coupled estrogen receptor 1 (GPER1), which binds and activates GPER1 to exert various neurological functions. However, the preventive effect of G1 on post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and its mechanisms are unclear. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the protective effect of G1 against synaptic and mitochondrial impairments and to investigate the mechanism of G1 to improve PTSD from brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF)/tyrosine kinase receptor B (TrkB) signaling. METHODS: This study initially detected GPER1 expression in the hippocampus of single prolonged stress (SPS) mice, utilizing both Western blot and immunofluorescence staining. Subsequently, the effects of G1 on PTSD-like behaviors, synaptic, and mitochondrial functions in SPS mice were investigated. Additionally, the involvement of BDNF/TrkB signaling involved in the protection was further confirmed using GPER1 antagonist and TrkB inhibitor, respectively. RESULTS: The expression of GPER1 was reduced in the hippocampus of SPS mice, and G1 treatment given for 14 consecutive days significantly improved PTSD-like behaviors in SPS mice compared with model group. Electrophysiological local field potential (LFP) results showed that G1 administration for 14 consecutive days could reverse the abnormal changes in the gamma oscillation in the CA1 region of SPS mice. Meanwhile, G1 administration for 14 consecutive days could significantly improve the abnormal expression of synaptic proteins, increase the expression of mitochondria-related proteins, increase the number of synapses in the hippocampus, and ameliorate the damage of hippocampal mitochondrial structure in SPS mice. In addition, G15 (GPER1 inhibitor) and ANA-12 (TrkB inhibitor) blocked the ameliorative effects of G1 on PTSD-like behaviors and aberrant expression of hippocampal synaptic and mitochondrial proteins in SPS mice and inhibited the reparative effects of G1 on structural damage to hippocampal mitochondria, respectively. CONCLUSION: G1 improved PTSD-like behaviors in SPS mice, possibly by increasing hippocampal GPER1 expression and promoting BDNF/TrkB signaling to repair synaptic and mitochondrial functional impairments. This study would provide critical mechanism for the prevention and treatment of PTSD.
Subject(s)
Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor , Hippocampus , Mitochondria , Receptors, Estrogen , Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic , Synapses , Animals , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/metabolism , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/prevention & control , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/drug therapy , Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor/metabolism , Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled/metabolism , Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled/antagonists & inhibitors , Mice , Male , Mitochondria/drug effects , Mitochondria/metabolism , Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism , Synapses/drug effects , Synapses/metabolism , Hippocampus/metabolism , Hippocampus/drug effects , Receptor, trkB/metabolism , Receptor, trkB/antagonists & inhibitors , Mice, Inbred C57BLABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Despite a large body of evidence linking the impact of trauma, parenting, and child maltreatment recidivism, current child welfare services often do not target maternal trauma and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Moreover, there is little evidence that traditional family preservation services (FPS) lower the rates of repeat incidences of child abuse and neglect. The novel intervention, Parenting-STAIR (P-STAIR), seeks to address maternal mental health and parenting skills in order to reduce punitive parenting behaviors. OBJECTIVE: This study analyzes the effects of P-STAIR on child maltreatment risk. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: P-STAIR was administered to 112 child welfare-involved mothers in New York City (NYC). The mothers were between 18 and 52 years old (M = 31.1, SD = 6.6) and were referred from 4 child welfare preventive service agencies in NYC. METHODS: To evaluate change over time in indicators of maltreatment risk, two-tailed paired sample t-tests compared 1) pre- and post-treatment scores and 2) pre-treatment and 3-month follow-up scores. RESULTS: Among the 71 mothers who completed treatment, significant improvements from baseline to post-assessment and pre- to 3-month follow-up were observed across total scores on the CTSPC and the AAPI-2. Improvements were evident in nonviolent disciple, psychological aggression, expectations, empathy, and parent-child family roles at both the post-assessment and 3-month follow-up which are proximal outcomes of P-STAIR (CTSPC: pre-post nonviolent disciple d = 0.70; pre-post psychological aggression d = 0.34; pre-follow-up nonviolent disciple d = 0.42; pre-follow-up psychological aggression d = 0.36; AAPI-2; pre-post expectations d = 0.31; pre-post empathy d = 0.39; pre-post parent-child roles d = 0.47; pre-follow-up expectations d = 0.33; pre-follow-up empathy d = 0.42; pre-follow-up parent-child roles d = 0.66). CONCLUSIONS: The improvement in indicators of maltreatment risk demonstrates promising support for the utility of P-STAIR within the child welfare system.
Subject(s)
Child Abuse , Parenting , Humans , Child Abuse/prevention & control , Child Abuse/psychology , Female , Parenting/psychology , Pilot Projects , Adult , Child , Risk Factors , Young Adult , Adolescent , New York City , Mothers/psychology , Middle Aged , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/psychology , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/prevention & control , Male , Child Protective ServicesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Nurses, the largest workforce in healthcare, are at high risk of depression, anxiety, burnout, and suicidal ideation. Suicide among nurses is higher than the general population. This randomized controlled trial pairs the MINDBODYSTRONG© cognitive-behavioral skills building program with the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention's (AFSP) Modified Interactive Screening Program (mISP) to reduce depression, suicidal ideation, post-traumatic stress, anxiety, and burnout, and improve healthy lifestyle beliefs, healthy lifestyle behaviors, and job satisfaction in nurses with moderate to high risk of suicide. AIMS: This study aims to determine the effects of the mISP combined with the digitized MINDBODYSTRONG© program versus the mISP alone on depression, suicidal ideation, burnout, anxiety, post-traumatic stress, healthy lifestyle beliefs, healthy lifestyle behaviors, and job satisfaction in 364 U.S. nurses. METHODS: A digitized version of MINDBODYSTRONG© combined with the mISP screening and referral platform will be compared to the AFSP mISP alone through a two-arm randomized controlled trial. Follow-up post-intervention data will be collected at week eight and months three, six, and 12. DISCUSSION: If successful, this study's findings could assist nurses who are hesitant to use conventional mental health resources by providing them with confidential aid and learning opportunities to reduce suicidality, depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress, and burnout and improve healthy lifestyle beliefs, healthy lifestyle behaviors, and job satisfaction. TRIAL/STUDY REGISTRATION: The Ohio State University Protocol Record 2021B0417, Modified Interactive Screening Program Plus MINDBODYSTRONG: A Mental Health Resiliency Intervention for Nurses, is registered and posted at ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05582343. First posted date is October 17, 2022.
Subject(s)
Burnout, Professional , Mental Health , Nurses , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Anxiety , Burnout, Professional/prevention & control , Burnout, Professional/psychology , Depression , Job Satisfaction , Mass Screening/methods , Nurses/psychology , Resilience, Psychological , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/prevention & control , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/psychology , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/diagnosis , Suicidal Ideation , Suicide Prevention , Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicABSTRACT
The aim of the psychotrauma prevention algorithm is to limit the occurrence of psychotrauma in a subject who has experienced a serious life event, by carrying out an initial assessment to define the severity criterion and the monitoring modality best suited to his or her clinical condition. This approach is in line with the philosophy of outreach and the ethics of concern. Recontacting the patient during the course of treatment helps to maintain the therapeutic link and prevent any deterioration in his condition, thus limiting the risk of his traumatic state becoming chronic.
Subject(s)
Algorithms , Humans , Pilot Projects , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/psychology , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/prevention & control , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/nursing , Life Change Events , Male , Female , Adult , France , Emergency Medical Services , Middle AgedABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Common mental health conditions (CMHCs), including depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), are highly prevalent in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). Preventive strategies combining psychological interventions with interventions addressing the social determinants of mental health may represent a key strategy for effectively preventing CMHCs. However, no systematic reviews have evaluated the effectiveness of these combined intervention strategies for preventing CMHCs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This systematic review will include randomised controlled trials (RCTs) focused on the effectiveness of interventions that combine preventive psychological interventions with interventions that address the social determinants of mental health in LMICs. Primary outcome is the frequency of depression, anxiety or PTSD at postintervention as determined by a formal diagnostic tool or any other standardised criteria. We will search Epistemonikos, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Global Index Medicus, ClinicalTrials.gov (Ctgov), International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). Two reviewers will independently extract the data and evaluate the risk of bias of included studies using the Cochrane risk of bias tool 2. Random-effects meta-analyses will be performed, and certainty of evidence will be rated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study uses data from published studies; therefore, ethical review is not required. Findings will be presented in a published manuscript. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023451072.
Subject(s)
Developing Countries , Social Determinants of Health , Systematic Reviews as Topic , Humans , Research Design , Psychosocial Intervention/methods , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/prevention & control , Meta-Analysis as Topic , Mental Health , Depression/prevention & control , Mental Disorders/prevention & control , Mental Disorders/therapy , Anxiety/prevention & control , Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Acute traumatic stress symptoms may develop in people who have been exposed to a traumatic event. Although they are usually self-limiting in time, some people develop post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), a severe and debilitating condition. Pharmacological interventions have been proposed for acute symptoms to act as an indicated prevention measure for PTSD development. As many individuals will spontaneously remit, these interventions should balance efficacy and tolerability. OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and acceptability of early pharmacological interventions for prevention of PTSD in adults experiencing acute traumatic stress symptoms. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Common Mental Disorders Controlled Trial Register (CCMDCTR), CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and two other databases. We checked the reference lists of all included studies and relevant systematic reviews. The search was last updated on 23 January 2023. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials on adults exposed to any kind of traumatic event and presenting acute traumatic stress symptoms, without restriction on their severity. We considered comparisons of any medication with placebo, or with another medication. We excluded trials that investigated medications as an augmentation to psychotherapy. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methodological procedures. Using a random-effects model, we analysed dichotomous data as risk ratios (RR) and calculated the number needed to treat for an additional beneficial/harmful outcome (NNTB/NNTH). We analysed continuous data as mean differences (MD) or standardised mean differences (SMD). Our primary outcomes were PTSD severity and dropouts due to adverse events. Secondary outcomes included PTSD rate, functional disability and quality of life. MAIN RESULTS: We included eight studies that considered four interventions (escitalopram, hydrocortisone, intranasal oxytocin, temazepam) and involved a total of 779 participants. The largest trial contributed 353 participants and the next largest, 120 and 118 participants respectively. The trials enrolled participants admitted to trauma centres or emergency departments. The risk of bias in the included studies was generally low except for attrition rate, which we rated as high-risk. We could meta-analyse data for two comparisons: escitalopram versus placebo (but limited to secondary outcomes) and hydrocortisone versus placebo. One study compared escitalopram to placebo at our primary time point of three months after the traumatic event. There was inconclusive evidence of any difference in terms of PTSD severity (mean difference (MD) on the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS, score range 0 to 136) -11.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) -24.56 to 1.86; 1 study, 23 participants; very low-certainty evidence), dropouts due to adverse events (no participant left the study early due to adverse events; 1 study, 31 participants; very low-certainty evidence) and PTSD rates (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.03 to 13.08; NNTB 37, 95% CI NNTB 15 to NNTH 1; 1 study, 23 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The study did not assess functional disability or quality of life. Three studies compared hydrocortisone to placebo at our primary time point of three months after the traumatic event. We found inconclusive evidence on whether hydrocortisone was more effective in reducing the severity of PTSD symptoms compared to placebo (MD on CAPS -7.53, 95% CI -25.20 to 10.13; I2 = 85%; 3 studies, 136 participants; very low-certainty evidence) and whether it reduced the risk of developing PTSD (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.09 to 2.38; NNTB 14, 95% CI NNTB 8 to NNTH 5; I2 = 36%; 3 studies, 136 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Evidence on the risk of dropping out due to adverse events is inconclusive (RR 3.19, 95% CI 0.13 to 75.43; 2 studies, 182 participants; low-certainty evidence) and it is unclear whether hydrocortisone might improve quality of life (MD on the SF-36 (score range 0 to 136, higher is better) 19.70, 95% CI -1.10 to 40.50; 1 study, 43 participants; very low-certainty evidence). No study assessed functional disability. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This review provides uncertain evidence regarding the use of escitalopram, hydrocortisone, intranasal oxytocin and temazepam for people with acute stress symptoms. It is therefore unclear whether these pharmacological interventions exert a positive or negative effect in this population. It is important to note that acute traumatic stress symptoms are often limited in time, and that the lack of data prevents the careful assessment of expected benefits against side effects that is therefore required. To yield stronger conclusions regarding both positive and negative outcomes, larger sample sizes are required. A common operational framework of criteria for inclusion and baseline assessment might help in better understanding who, if anyone, benefits from an intervention. As symptom severity alone does not provide the full picture of the impact of exposure to trauma, assessment of quality of life and functional impairment would provide a more comprehensive picture of the effects of the interventions. The assessment and reporting of side effects may facilitate a more comprehensive understanding of tolerability.
Subject(s)
Bias , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic , Stress Disorders, Traumatic, Acute , Humans , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/prevention & control , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/drug therapy , Adult , Stress Disorders, Traumatic, Acute/prevention & control , Quality of Life , Citalopram/therapeutic use , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Placebos/therapeutic useABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Since 2020, the world has been battling the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The mortality and morbidity at the height of the pandemic sparked generalised fear and uncertainty about the future. Concerns were raised about the psychological impact of the pandemic on workers in healthcare systems globally. This study was conducted to establish the degree of psychological impact of the pandemic on frontline health workers in Lesotho. METHODS: The study used a quantitative cross-sectional survey design. The Kessler psychological distress screening tool (K-10) and the post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) checklist for civilians (PCL-C) were administered to screen for psychological distress among clinical staff at St. Joseph's Hospital in Roma and its four Health Centres. Additional open- and closed-ended questions were added for context. Data were analysed using Fisher's exact tests, Pearson chi-square tests and correlation studies. RESULTS: Of the 101 participants, 42 (41.6%) scored ≥ 24 on the K-10 scale (95% CI: 32.0% - 51.2%) indicating moderate to severe psychological distress and 32 (31.7%) scored ≥ 50 on the PCL-C checklist suggesting severe PTSD (95% CI: 24.5% - 42.9%). High scores on the K-10 were found more among men than women (17 [37.8%] vs. 4 [7.1%]; p ≤ 0.001). Post-traumatic stress disorder was more in the younger age group (p ≤ 0.03), in those reporting anxiety (p = 0.005) and those with more co-morbidities (p ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study revealed the grave psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on frontline clinical health workers in Lesotho.Contribution: These data will assist health leaders and policymakers to implement mental health support interventions for health workers in future.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Psychological Distress , Roma , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic , Male , Female , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/epidemiology , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/prevention & control , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Cross-Sectional Studies , Lesotho/epidemiology , DepressionSubject(s)
Behavioral Research , Genocide , Research Personnel , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic , Humans , Behavioral Research/trends , Genocide/prevention & control , Genocide/psychology , Rwanda , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/prevention & control , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/psychology , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/therapyABSTRACT
ABSTRACTBackground: Many healthcare workers (HCWs) endured psychologically traumatic events at work during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. For some, these events are re-experienced as unwanted, recurrent, and distressing intrusive memories. Simple psychological support measures are needed to reduce such symptoms of post-traumatic stress in this population. A novel intervention to target intrusive memories, called an imagery-competing task intervention (ICTI), has been developed from the laboratory. The intervention includes a brief memory reminder cue, then a visuospatial task (Tetris® gameplay using mental rotation instructions for approximately 20â min) thought to interfere with the traumatic memory image and reduce its intrusiveness. The intervention has been adapted and evaluated in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) with Swedish HCWs (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04460014).Objective: We aimed to explore how HCWs who worked during the COVID-19 pandemic experienced the use of a brief intervention to reduce their intrusive memories of work-related trauma.Method: Interpretative phenomenological analysis was used for in-depth understanding of the lived experiences of HCWs who used the intervention. Seven participants from the RCT were interviewed by an independent researcher without prior knowledge of the intervention. Interviews were conducted via telephone and transcribed verbatim.Results: Four general themes were generated: 'Triggers and troublesome images', 'Five Ws regarding support - what, when, why, by/with who, for whom', 'Receiving it, believing it, and doing it' and 'The intervention - a different kind of help'; the last two included two subthemes each. The results reflect participants' similarities and differences in their lived experiences of intrusive memories, support measures, and intervention impressions and effects.Conclusion: HCWs' experiences of the novel ICTI reflect a promising appraisal of the intervention as a potential help measure for reducing intrusive memories after trauma, and gives us a detailed understanding of HCWs' needs, with suggestions for its adaption for future implementation.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04460014.
Many healthcare workers experience images or 'flashbacks' of traumatic experiences from their work during the COVID-19 pandemic.To ensure that individual needs are met, there is a need to tailor and refine current psychological support measures and their use for healthcare workers.The imagery-competing task intervention was perceived as acceptable, indicating its potential utility as a help measure to reduce intrusive memories after trauma.
Subject(s)
Health Personnel , Psychological Trauma , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Health Personnel/psychology , Psychological Trauma/psychology , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/prevention & control , PandemicsABSTRACT
Psychological birth trauma and childbirth-related posttraumatic stress disorder represent a substantial burden of disease with 6.6 million mothers and 1.7 million fathers or co-parents affected by childbirth-related posttraumatic stress disorder worldwide each year. There is mounting evidence to indicate that parents who develop childbirth-related posttraumatic stress disorder do so as a direct consequence of a traumatic childbirth experience. High-risk groups, such as those who experience preterm birth, stillbirth, or preeclampsia, have higher prevalence rates. The main risks include antenatal factors (eg, depression in pregnancy, fear of childbirth, poor health or complications in pregnancy, history of trauma or sexual abuse, or mental health problems), perinatal factors (eg, negative subjective birth experience, operative birth, obstetrical complications, and severe maternal morbidity, as well as maternal near misses, lack of support, dissociation), and postpartum factors (eg, depression, postpartum physical complications, and poor coping and stress). The link between birth events and childbirth-related posttraumatic stress disorder provides a valuable opportunity to prevent traumatic childbirths and childbirth-related posttraumatic stress disorder from occurring in the first place. Childbirth-related posttraumatic stress disorder is an extremely distressing mental disorder and has a substantial negative impact on those who give birth, fathers or co-parents, and, potentially, the whole family. Still, a traumatic childbirth experience and childbirth-related posttraumatic stress disorder remain largely unrecognized in maternity services and are not routinely screened for during pregnancy and the postpartum period. In fact, there are gaps in the evidence on how, when, and who to screen. Similarly, there is a lack of evidence on how best to treat those affected. Primary prevention efforts (eg, screening for antenatal risk factors, use of trauma-informed care) are aimed at preventing a traumatic childbirth experience and childbirth-related posttraumatic stress disorder in the first place by eliminating or reducing risk factors for childbirth-related posttraumatic stress disorder. Secondary prevention approaches (eg, trauma-focused psychological therapies, early psychological interventions) aim to identify those who have had a traumatic childbirth experience and to intervene to prevent the development of childbirth-related posttraumatic stress disorder. Tertiary prevention (eg, trauma-focused cognitive behavioural therapy and eye movement desensitization and reprocessing) seeks to ensure that people with childbirth-related posttraumatic stress disorder are identified and treated to recovery so that childbirth-related posttraumatic stress disorder does not become chronic. Adequate prevention, screening, and intervention could alleviate a considerable amount of suffering in affected families. In light of the available research on the impact of childbirth-related posttraumatic stress disorder on families, it is important to develop and evaluate assessment, prevention, and treatment interventions that target the birthing person, the couple dyad, the parent-infant dyad, and the family as a whole. Further research should focus on the inclusion of couples in different constellations and, more generally, on the inclusion of more diverse populations in diverse settings. The paucity of national and international policy guidance on the prevention, care, and treatment of psychological birth trauma and the lack of formal psychological birth trauma services and training, highlight the need to engage with service managers and policy makers.
Subject(s)
Premature Birth , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/diagnosis , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/prevention & control , Parturition , Postpartum Period/psychology , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
Current pharmacological treatments against post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) lack adequate efficacy. As a result, intense research has focused on identifying other molecular pathways mediating the pathogenesis of this condition. One such pathway is neuroinflammation, which has demonstrated a role in PTSD pathogenesis by causing synaptic dysfunction, neuronal death, and functional impairment in the hippocampus. Phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibitors (PDEIs) have emerged as promising therapeutic agents against neuroinflammation in other neurological conditions. Furthermore, PDEIs have shown some promise in animal models of PTSD. However, the current model of PTSD pathogenesis, which is based on dysregulated fear learning, implies that PDE inhibition in neurons should enhance the acquisition of fear memory from the traumatic event. As a result, we hypothesized that PDEIs may improve PTSD symptoms through inhibiting neuroinflammation rather than long-term potentiation-related mechanisms. To this end, we tested the therapeutic efficacy of cilostazol, a selective inhibitor of PDE3, on PTSD-related anxiety symptoms in the underwater trauma model of PTSD. PDE3 is expressed much more richly in microglia and astrocytes compared to neurons in the murine brain. Furthermore, we used hippocampal indolamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO) expression and interleukin 1 beta (IL-1ß) concentration as indicators of neuroinflammation. We observed that cilostazol pretreatment prevented the development of anxiety symptoms and the increase in hippocampal IDO and IL-1ß following PTSD induction. As a result, PDE3 inhibition ameliorated the neuroinflammatory processes involved in the development of PTSD symptoms. Therefore, cilostazol and other PDEIs may be promising candidates for further investigation as pharmacological therapies against PTSD.
Subject(s)
Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic , Mice , Animals , Cilostazol/pharmacology , Cilostazol/therapeutic use , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/drug therapy , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/prevention & control , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/metabolism , Neuroinflammatory Diseases , Anxiety/drug therapy , Anxiety/prevention & control , Hippocampus/metabolismABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of Transcendental Meditation® (TM®) practice on the multidimensional well-being of nurse clinicians affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. BACKGROUND: The health of clinical nurses has substantial impact on both the availability of a nursing workforce and the quality and safety of patient care. TM improved health and coping strategies across many populations. METHODS: Clinical nurses were recruited from 3 Magnet®-designated hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic. Well-being outcomes included flourishing, burnout, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress disorder. Participants were randomized following completion of baseline surveys into immediate (intervention) or delayed (control) TM instruction. Surveys were repeated at 1 and 3 months following baseline survey or TM instruction. Repeated-measures analysis of variance compared differences in groups over time. RESULTS: Across the 3 sites, there were 104 clinical nurse participants. Repeated-measures analysis of variance showed significant medium to large effects in improvement over time in well-being measures for the intervention group. CONCLUSIONS: TM improved multidimensional well-being of clinical nurses by reducing posttraumatic stress disorder, anxiety, and burnout and improving flourishing. TM is easy to practice anywhere. The benefits are immediate and cumulative. Organizations and individual nurses can use TM to support clinical nurses in the difficult and meaningful work of patient care, especially in challenging times. Future studies may consider the feasibility of integrating TM into clinical shifts and evaluating its impact on patient and organizational outcomes.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Meditation , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic , Humans , Meditation/methods , Pandemics , Anxiety/prevention & control , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/prevention & controlABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Children admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) have post-traumatic stress (PTS) rates up to 64%, and up to 28% of them meet criteria for PTS disorder (PTSD). We aim to examine whether a prior trauma history and increased physiologic parameters due to a heightened sympathetic response are associated with later PTS. Our hypothesis was children with history of prehospitalization trauma, higher heart rates, blood pressures, cortisol, and extrinsic catecholamine administration during PICU admission are more likely to have PTS after discharge. METHODS: This is a prospective, observational study of children admitted to the PICU at an urban, quaternary, academic children's hospital. Children aged 8 to 17 years old without developmental delay, severe psychiatric disorder, or traumatic brain injury were included. Children's prehospitalization trauma history was assessed with a semistructured interview. All in-hospital variables were from the electronic medical record. PTS was present if children had 4 of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders IV criteria for PTSD. Student's t- and chi-squared tests were used to compare the presence or absence of prior trauma and all of the PICU-associated variables. RESULTS: Of the 110 children at baseline, 67 had 3-month follow-up. In the latter group, 46% met the criteria for PTS, mean age of 13 years (SD 3), 57% male, a mean PRISM III score of 4.9 (SD 4.3), and intensive care unit length of stay 6.5 days (SD 7.8). There were no statistically significant differences in the demographics of the children with and without PTS. The only variable to show significance was trauma history; children with prehospitalization trauma were more likely to have PTS at 3-month follow-up (P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Prehospitalization trauma history was associated with the presence of PTS after admission to the PICU. This study suggests future studies should shift to the potential predictive benefit of screening children for trauma history upon PICU admission.
Subject(s)
Brain Injuries, Traumatic , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic , Child , Humans , Male , Adolescent , Female , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/etiology , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/diagnosis , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/prevention & control , Patient Discharge , Hospitalization , Intensive Care Units, PediatricABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Women can develop posttraumatic stress disorder in response to experienced or perceived traumatic, often medically complicated, childbirth; the prevalence of these events remains high in the United States. Currently, no recommended treatment exists in routine care to prevent or mitigate maternal childbirth-related posttraumatic stress disorder. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials that evaluated any therapy to prevent or treat childbirth-related posttraumatic stress disorder. DATA SOURCES: PsycInfo, PsycArticles, PubMed (MEDLINE), ClinicalTrials.gov, CINAHL, ProQuest, Sociological Abstracts, Google Scholar, Embase, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched for eligible trials published through September 2023. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Trials were included if they were interventional, if they evaluated any therapy for childbirth-related posttraumatic stress disorder for the indication of symptoms or before posttraumatic stress disorder onset, and if they were written in English. METHODS: Independent coders extracted the sample characteristics and intervention information of the eligible studies and evaluated the trials using the Downs and Black's quality checklist and Cochrane's method for risk of bias evaluation. Meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate pooled effect sizes of secondary and tertiary prevention trials. RESULTS: A total of 41 studies (32 randomized controlled trials, 9 nonrandomized trials) were reviewed. They evaluated brief psychological therapies including debriefing, trauma-focused therapies (including cognitive behavioral therapy and expressive writing), memory consolidation and reconsolidation blockage, mother-infant-focused therapies, and educational interventions. The trials targeted secondary preventions aimed at buffering childbirth-related posttraumatic stress disorder usually after traumatic childbirth (n=24), tertiary preventions among women with probable childbirth-related posttraumatic stress disorder (n=14), and primary prevention during pregnancy (n=3). A meta-analysis of the combined randomized secondary preventions showed moderate effects in reducing childbirth-related posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms when compared with usual treatment (standardized mean difference, -0.67; 95% confidence interval, -0.92 to -0.42). Single-session therapy within 96 hours of birth was helpful (standardized mean difference, -0.55). Brief, structured, trauma-focused therapies and semi-structured, midwife-led, dialogue-based psychological counseling showed the largest effects (standardized mean difference, -0.95 and -0.91, respectively). Other treatment approaches (eg, the Tetris game, mindfulness, mother-infant-focused treatment) warrant more research. Tertiary preventions produced smaller effects than secondary prevention but are potentially clinically meaningful (standardized mean difference, -0.37; -0.60 to -0.14). Antepartum educational approaches may help, but insufficient empirical evidence exists. CONCLUSION: Brief trauma-focused and non-trauma-focused psychological therapies delivered early in the period following traumatic childbirth offer a critical and feasible opportunity to buffer the symptoms of childbirth-related posttraumatic stress disorder. Future research that integrates diagnostic and biological measures can inform treatment use and the mechanisms at work.
Subject(s)
Parturition , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic , Humans , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/prevention & control , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/therapy , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/psychology , Female , Pregnancy , Parturition/psychology , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/methodsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Following a traumatic event, 40-80% of the patients with acute stress disorder (ASD) will develop post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), 67% at 6 months. Alpha1-blockers are effective in treating some symptoms of PTSD but their usefulness in acute stress situations remains unclear. We hypothesized that reducing noradrenergic hyperactivity with an alpha1-blocker during the acute phase after a traumatic event could prevent the transition to PTSD in patients with ASD. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of a 1-month course of alpha1-blocker (prazosin) to prevent the transition to PTSD in patients with ASD at 6 months. METHOD: In a monocentric open-label prospective pilot study, 15 patients with ASD were included within 3-7â days of exposure to a traumatic event. After enrolment, they received prazosin LP at home at bedtime at 2.5â mg/day for 7â days and then 5â mg/day for 21 days. Incidence of PTSD was assessed at 6 months using the Clinician Administrated PTSD Scale (CAPS). RESULTS: At 6 months, 22% of patients who completed the study (2/9) met the diagnostic criteria for PTSD. This rate was significantly lower than that observed in previous studies (67%; p = .047). The treatment was well tolerated and there were no serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary findings indicating the safety of prazosin and suggesting its potential to prevent the development of PTSD in ASD require to be replicated in large-scale randomized placebo-controlled studies.Trial registration: The study was pre-registered on a public database (www.clinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03045016).
Alpha1-blockers are safe and well tolerated in patients with acute stress disorder.The use of alpha1-blockers 37 days after traumatic exposure is worthy of study.Alpha1-blockers could prevent the transition to PTSD in ASD patients at 6 months.
Subject(s)
Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic , Stress Disorders, Traumatic, Acute , Humans , Prazosin/therapeutic use , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/drug therapy , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/prevention & control , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/diagnosis , Stress Disorders, Traumatic, Acute/drug therapy , Pilot Projects , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
Extensive burns can cause nonnegligible acute and chronic damage to central nervous system of patients. The damage of central nervous system may have a profound impact on patients, including neurobehavioral changes such as post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, anxiety, and sleep disorder. These changes may persist after injury, greatly affecting patients' integration into society and return to work. This paper systematically reviewed the clinical manifestations, pathogenesis, and current intervention methods of mental disorders in patients with extensive burns, aiming to provide a basis for further understanding, prevention, and treatment of patients with mental disorders after burns.
Subject(s)
Burns , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic , Humans , Anxiety , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/etiology , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/prevention & control , Anxiety Disorders/complications , Burns/complications , Burns/therapy , Burns/pathologyABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Intensive care unit (ICU) hospitalization is challenging for the family members of the patients. Most family members report some level of anxiety and depression, sometimes even resulting in post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). An association has been reported between lack of information and PTSD. This study had three aims: to quantify the psychological burden of family members of critically ill patients, to explore whether a website with specific information could reduce PTSD symptoms, and to ascertain whether a website with information about intensive care would be used. METHOD: A multicenter double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was carried out in Austria and Switzerland. RESULTS: In total, 89 members of families of critically ill patients (mean age 47.3 ± 12.9 years, female n = 59, 66.3%) were included in the study. 46 relatives were allocated to the intervention website and 43 to the control website. Baseline Impact of Event Scale (IES) score was 27.5 ± 12.7. Overall, 50% showed clinically relevant PTSD symptoms at baseline. Mean IES score for the primary endpoint (~ 30 days after inclusion, T1) was 24 ± 15.8 (intervention 23.9 ± 17.9 vs. control 24.1 ± 13.5, p = 0.892). Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS - Deutsch (D)) score at T1 was 12.2 ± 6.1 (min. 3, max. 31) and did not differ between groups. Use of the website differed between the groups (intervention min. 1, max. 14 vs. min. 1, max. 3; total 1386 "clicks" on the website, intervention 1021 vs. control 365). Recruitment was prematurely stopped in February 2020 due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). CONCLUSION: Family members of critically ill patients often have significant PTSD symptoms and online information on critical illness did not result in reduced PTSD symptoms.