Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 16.548
Filter
2.
JBJS Rev ; 12(9)2024 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39283964

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Incisional dressings may decrease wound complications and joint infection after total hip and knee arthroplasties (THA; TKA). However, there is no consensus on the superiority of a particular product. This study compared infection and wound complications among randomized controlled trials (RCTs) across various dressing types after primary THA and TKA. METHODS: Scopus, Ovid/MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were queried in May 2024. A frequentist model network meta-analysis of eligible prospective RCTs compared minor and major wound complications and dressing changes using P-scores. RESULTS: Of 3,067 compiled studies, 12 RCTs of 1,939 patients with median (interquartile range) follow-up of 42 (382) days undergoing primary THA (n = 880, 45.4%) or TKA (n = 1,059, 54.6%) with alginate (n = 208; 10.7%), absorbent (n = 236; 12.2%), gauze (n = 474; 24.4%), or hydrofiber (n = 683; 35.2%) dressings or negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT; n = 338; 17.4%) were included for meta-analysis. Compared with gauze, alginate and hydrofiber dressings were associated with fewer postoperative changes (mean difference [MD], -12.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], -15.08 to -9.09, p < 0.001; MD, -3.5; 95% CI, -6.30 to -0.74, p = 0.013, respectively). In a subanalysis, silver-ion hydrofiber also was associated with fewer changes (MD, -5.0; 95% CI, -5.70 to -4.39; p < 0.001). Overall, there was no statistically significant risk of increased minor nor major wound complications including superficial and deep infections among all dressing types and NPWT compared with gauze. CONCLUSION: Despite no association between wound complications nor infection risk among various incisional dressings and NPWT vs. gauze, the alginate, hydrofiber, and silver hydrofiber dressings had statistically fewer mean postoperative changes. Future studies are required to assess whether these dressings confer reduced infection risk. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee , Bandages , Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy , Network Meta-Analysis , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Surgical Wound Infection , Humans , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Surgical Wound Infection/etiology
3.
JMIR Res Protoc ; 13: e57820, 2024 Sep 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39284180

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients with open fractures often experience complications during their injury. The treatments incur high costs. Interdisciplinary cooperation between different medical disciplines may improve treatment outcomes. Such cooperation has not yet been envisaged in the German health care system. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to improve the treatment of fractures with open soft tissue damage or postoperative complications in terms of duration and sustainability in a region in northwest Germany. Largely standardized diagnostics and therapy are intended to optimize processes in hospitals. In addition, a reduction in the duration of treatment and treatment costs is to be achieved. METHODS: Using a digital platform, physicians from 31 hospitals present patient cases to an interdisciplinary group of experts from the fields of plastic surgery, infectiology, hygiene, and others. The group of experts from the environment of the University Hospital Münster promptly makes a joint treatment recommendation for the individual case. The plan is to examine 3300 patients with open fractures or surgical complications. As consortium partners, there are also 3 statutory health insurance companies. The extent to which the therapy recommendations are effective and contribute to cost reduction in the health care system will be empirically investigated in a stepped-wedge cluster-randomized design. In addition, medical and nonmedical professional groups involved in the project will be asked about their work in the project (in total, 248 clinic employees). The primary outcome is the complication rate of open fractures or the occurrence of postoperative complications. As secondary outcomes, the number of antibiotics administered, limb function, and quality of life will be assessed. The health economic evaluation refers to the costs of health services and absenteeism. For the work-related evaluation, workload, work engagement, work-related resources, readiness for technology, and ergonomic aspects of the new telemedical technology will be collected. In addition, clinic employees will give their assessments of the success of the project in a structured telephone interview based on scaled and open-ended questions. RESULTS: The project started in June 2022; data collection started in April 2023. As of mid-June 2024, data from 425 patients had been included. In total, 146 members of staff had taken part in the questionnaire survey and 15 had taken part in the interviews. CONCLUSIONS: Standardized treatment pathways in the standard care of patients with open fractures and postoperative infections will be established to reduce complications, improve chances of recovery, and reduce costs. Unnecessary and redundant treatment steps will be avoided through standardized diagnostics and therapy. The interdisciplinary treatment perspective allows for a more individualized therapy. In the medium term, outpatient or inpatient treatment centers specialized in the patient group could be set up where the new diagnostic and therapeutic pathways could be competently applied. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00031308; https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00031308. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/57820.


Subject(s)
Fractures, Open , Humans , Fractures, Open/surgery , Germany , Lower Extremity/surgery , Lower Extremity/injuries , Surgical Wound Infection/economics , Surgical Wound Infection/therapy , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Patient Care Team , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Female , Male
4.
JBJS Rev ; 12(9)2024 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39226392

ABSTRACT

¼ We aimed to determine the cost-effectiveness of different protocols of extended postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis (E-PAP) following adult spinal surgery.¼ Both stratified (randomized controlled trials only) and nonstratified (all studies) analyses demonstrated that E-PAP has no significant value in reducing the rate of surgical site infection (SSI), deep SSI, or superficial SSI.¼ Notably, the E-PAP protocols were associated with a significant increase in the length of hospital stay, resulting in an additional expenditure of $244.4 per episode for the E-PAP 72 hours protocol compared with PAP 24 hours and $309.8 per episode for the E-PAP >48 hours protocol compared with PAP <48 hours.¼ E-PAP does not demonstrate any significant reduction in the rate of SSIs following spine surgery. However, these extended protocols were significantly associated with an increase in the length of hospital stay and higher overall projected costs.


Subject(s)
Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Spine , Surgical Wound Infection , Adult , Humans , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/economics , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/economics , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/methods , Length of Stay/economics , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Spine/surgery , Surgical Wound Infection/economics , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
5.
BMC Cancer ; 24(1): 1089, 2024 Sep 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39223466

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of arginine on immune function and postoperative complications in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search to identify eligible RCTs in various databases, such as PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Web of Science, MEDLINE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, VIP Medicine Information System (VIP), and Chinese Biomedical Database (CBM). This study aimed to examine IgA, IgG, and IgM levels as well as CD4+ and CD8+ counts as well as the CD4+/CD8+ ratio. Anastomotic leaking, length of stay (LOS), and surgical site infection (SSI) were included as secondary outcomes. Stata (StataCorp, version 14.0) was utilized for data analysis. To ensure the results were reliable, we used meta-regression, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias analysis. RESULTS: A total of 24 publications (including 1883 patients) out of 681 that were retrieved fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The arginine group showed notable improvements in humoral immunity, with gains in IgA (SMD=0.45, 95% CI: 0.30-0.60), IgG (SMD=0.80, 95% CI: 0.64-0.96), and IgM (SMD=0.66, 95% CI: 0.39-0.93). With regards to cellular immunity, the arginine group exhibited a substantial increase in the CD4+ T cell count (SMD = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.67-1.38) compared to the control group. However, the CD4+/CD8+ ratio decreased significantly (SMD=1.37, 95% CI: 0.88-1.86) in the same arginine group, indicating a change in the balance between these two cell types. Additionally, the CD8+ T cell count showed a notable decrease (SMD=-0.70, 95% CI: -1.09 to -0.32) in the arginine group when compared to the control group. Anastomotic leakage was also considerably lower in the arginine group (SMD=-0.05, 95% CI: -0.08 to -0.02), the rate of SSIs was lower (RR = -0.02, 95% CI: -0.05-0), and the length of time patients spent in the hospital was shorter (SMD=-0.15, 95% CI: -0.38 to -0.08). CONCLUSIONS: After radiation treatment for CRC, arginine improves immune function and decreases the risk of infection problems. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registration with PROSPERO for this meta-analysis is number CRD42024520509.


Subject(s)
Anastomotic Leak , Arginine , Colorectal Neoplasms , Surgical Wound Infection , Humans , Anastomotic Leak/blood , Anastomotic Leak/epidemiology , Anastomotic Leak/immunology , Anastomotic Leak/prevention & control , Arginine/administration & dosage , CD4-CD8 Ratio , Colorectal Neoplasms/blood , Colorectal Neoplasms/immunology , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Immunity, Humoral , Immunoglobulin A/blood , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Surgical Wound Infection/blood , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Surgical Wound Infection/immunology , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control
7.
BMC Vet Res ; 20(1): 430, 2024 Sep 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39342183

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Reusable surgical drapes have a lower lifetime environmental impact than disposable drapes in most cases. There is limited evidence regarding whether drape choice impacts patient outcomes including post-operative wound complications. The aim of this study is to compare wound complication rates following routine neutering surgeries in cats and dogs when reusable drapes are used as compared with disposable drapes. METHODS: The trial will be conducted as a pragmatic, multi-centre, parallel group randomised controlled trial in the UK. Dogs and cats undergoing routine neutering will be randomised to disposable or reusable drapes with all other aspects of care occurring as they usually would at the practice. The required sample size is 2,850, with 4750 animals to be recruited from up to ten practices to allow for a 40% loss to follow-up. Demographic data and details on peri-operative care will be collected at the time of surgery. Post-operative wound complications will be assessed and recorded as usual at each practice using clinical codes. The post-operative wound clinical codes and any antibiotic use within 30 days of surgery will be retrieved from the practice management software. The primary outcome that will be compared between the two groups is the rate of post-operative wound complications within 30 days of surgery which will be analysed by multivariable logistic regression with a binary outcome of wound complication (yes/no). Secondary outcomes are the prevalence of different types of complications and antibiotic use within 30 days of surgery which will be compared between the two groups by chi square analysis. DISCUSSION: Our hypothesis is that there will be no difference in post-operative wound complication rates between disposable and reusable drapes. If the likely rate of post-surgical wound complications with reusable drapes is similar to that with disposable drapes, then veterinary clinical teams can choose the more sustainable option, confident that their patients will not be impacted by this choice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: We have retrospectively registered the protocol on the Open Science Framework on 14 Nov 2023 (Trial registration entry: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/72HMA ).


Subject(s)
Disposable Equipment , Surgical Drapes , Surgical Wound Infection , Animals , Dogs , Cats/surgery , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Surgical Wound Infection/veterinary , Female , Male , Postoperative Complications/veterinary , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Equipment Reuse
8.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 60(9)2024 Sep 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39336589

ABSTRACT

Background and Objectives: Surgical site infections (SSIs) are a significant complication following ventral hernia repair, potentially leading to prolonged hospital stays and increased morbidity. This study aimed to evaluate whether closed incision negative pressure wound therapy (ciNPWT) reduces the incidence of SSI after ventral hernia repair with polypropylene mesh compared to standard wound care. Materials and Methods: A randomized study was conducted with 100 patients undergoing ventral hernia repair using a polypropylene mesh. Participants were divided into two groups: a control group (n=50), which received standard sterile gauze dressing with an iodine-based disinfectant, and an intervention group (n=50), treated with the ciNPWT system (Vivano® by HARTMANN) for 5 days postoperatively. The primary outcome was the incidence of SSI within one year after surgery. Secondary outcomes included the influence of factors such as age, sex, smoking status, and hernia size on SSI occurrence. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee at the University Hospital Ostrava, adhering to the ethical standards of the Helsinki Declaration. Results: The incidence of SSI was lower in the ciNPWT group compared to the standard care group (4% vs. 12%), though this difference did not reach statistical significance. No significant effect of sex or smoking status on SSI was observed. The control group had a shorter mean length of hospital stay. Larger hernias in the non-ciNPWT group were more prone to SSIs, as expected. Conclusions: Although limited by a small sample size, the findings suggest that ciNPWT may be associated with a reduced rate of SSI following ventral hernia repair. Further studies with larger populations are needed to confirm these results.


Subject(s)
Hernia, Ventral , Herniorrhaphy , Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy , Polypropylenes , Surgical Mesh , Surgical Wound Infection , Humans , Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy/methods , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Aged , Herniorrhaphy/methods , Herniorrhaphy/adverse effects , Hernia, Ventral/surgery , Adult , Treatment Outcome , Incidence
9.
Urol Clin North Am ; 51(4): 445-465, 2024 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39349013

ABSTRACT

Surgical site infections (SSIs) represent a major source of postoperative complications adversely impacting morbidity and mortality indices in surgical care. The discovery of antibiotics in the mid-20th century, and their ensuing use for preoperative antimicrobial bowel preparation and prophylaxis, drastically reduced the occurrence of SSIs providing a major tool to surgeons of various specialties, including urology. Because, the appropriate use of these antimicrobials is critical for their continued safety and efficacy, an understanding of the recommendations guiding their application is essential for all surgeons. Here, we comprehensively review these recommendations with a focus on open and laparoscopic urologic surgeries.


Subject(s)
Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Laparoscopy , Preoperative Care , Surgical Wound Infection , Urologic Surgical Procedures , Humans , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/methods , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Urologic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Urologic Surgical Procedures/methods , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Preoperative Care/methods , Cathartics/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use
10.
AORN J ; 120(4): 258-263, 2024 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39321146

ABSTRACT

Oral health and postoperative infective complications Key words: surgical site infection (SSI), dental treatment, periodontal disease, postoperative complications, biofilm. Preoperative dental treatment Key words: periodontal treatment, perioperative oral management, perioperative oral procedures, postoperative complications, focalized approach. Facial hair length Key words: beard cover, facial hair, bacterial shedding, clean shaven, mask. Using multidose medication vials in the OR Key words: multidose medication vial, patient treatment area, labeling, sterile access device, point of use.


Subject(s)
Surgical Wound Infection , Humans , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control
11.
Int Wound J ; 21(9): e70034, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39224961

ABSTRACT

Surgical wound complications are adverse events with important repercussions for the health of patients and health system. Surgical site infections and wound dehiscences are among the most important surgical wound complications, with a high incidence in paediatric patients undergoing surgery for non-idiopathic scoliosis. Incisional negative pressure wound therapy for surgical incisions is used as a preventive measure against surgical wound complications in adults; however, there has been scant evidence for using it in children. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of incisional negative pressure wound therapy in preventing surgical wound complications in paediatric patients undergoing surgery to treat non-idiopathic scoliosis. Randomized clinical trial. Children younger than 18 years of age undergoing surgery for non-idiopathic scoliosis were randomly assigned into two groups to receive one of two different types of dressings for the first 7 days after surgery. One group were treated with a postoperative hydrofibre and hydrocolloid dressing with silver for wounds (control group), and the other group received a single-use incisional negative pressure wound therapy system (intervention group). The wounds were assessed after removal of the dressings at 7 days after surgery and again at 30, 90, and 180 days after surgery. Surgical wound complications, sociodemographic variables, variables related to the procedure and postoperative period, economic costs of treatment of surgical wound complications, and time to healing of the surgical wound were recorded. Per protocol and per intention to treat analysis was made. The per protocol incidence of surgical wound complications was 7.7% in the intervention group versus 38.5% in the control group (p = 0.009; Fisher exact test. RR = 0.20 IC95%: 0.05-0.83). Surgical wound dehiscence, surgical site infections, seroma, and fibrin were the most common surgical wound complications. The type of surgery, duration of surgery, and patients' age were associated with a higher risk for surgical wound complications. Postoperative hydrofibre and hydrocolloid dressing with silver for wounds were found to be associated with a longer time to healing. Initial costs for dressings in the group receiving incisional negative pressure wound therapy were higher, but the total postoperative costs were higher for those receiving postoperative hydrofibre and hydrocolloid dressing with silver for wounds. It was found that for each US$1.00 of extra costs for using incisional negative pressure wound therapy, there was a benefit of US$12.93 in relation to the cost of complications prevented. Incisional negative pressure wound therapy is cost-effective in the prevention of surgical wound complications in children undergoing surgery for non-idiopathic scoliosis.


Subject(s)
Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy , Scoliosis , Surgical Wound Infection , Humans , Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy/methods , Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy/economics , Child , Male , Female , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Scoliosis/surgery , Adolescent , Wound Healing , Bandages/economics , Surgical Wound Dehiscence/prevention & control , Child, Preschool , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Treatment Outcome
12.
BMC Surg ; 24(1): 253, 2024 Sep 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39256696

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A surgical site infection (SSI) is a postoperative infection that occurs at or near the surgical incision. SSIs significantly increase morbidity, mortality, length of hospital stay, and healthcare costs. The World Health Organization (WHO) has established hospital hygiene precaution guidelines for the prevention of SSIs, which were enhanced during the COVID-19 pandemic. The current study aims to explore the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on SSI incidence among initially uninfected postoperative patients. We hypothesize that these enhanced precautions would reduce the incidence of SSIs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study comparing surgical outcomes before and during the pandemic. Patients who had abdominal surgery between June and December 2019 (Non-COVID-19) or between February and June 2020 (COVID-19) were included. The two groups were matched in a 1:1 ratio based on age, Sex, acuity (elective or emergent), surgical approach, and comorbidities. Electronic medical records were reviewed to identify SSIs and hospital readmissions within 30 days after surgery. Pearson's chi-square test and Fisher's exact test were used. RESULTS: Data was collected and analyzed from 976 patients who had surgery before the COVID-19 pandemic (non-COVID group) and 377 patients who had surgery during the pandemic (COVID group). After matching, there were 377 patients in each group. In our study, we found 23 surgical site infections (SSIs) in both laparoscopic and open surgeries. The incidence of SSIs was significantly higher in the non-COVID period compared to the COVID period [17 cases (4.5%) vs. 6 cases (1.6%), respectively, p = 0.032], especially in non-COVID open surgeries. The incidence of SSIs in laparoscopic surgeries was also higher during the non-COVID period, but not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Enhanced hygiene precautions during the COVID -19 pandemic may have reduced SSIs rates following abdominal surgery.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Surgical Wound Infection , Humans , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/epidemiology , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Male , Female , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , Aged , Infection Control/methods , Incidence , Abdomen/surgery , Pandemics , Adult , SARS-CoV-2 , Hygiene
13.
Syst Rev ; 13(1): 246, 2024 Sep 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39342380

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Fibrin sealants are increasingly used in head and neck surgery to aid hemostasis, but individual studies lack conclusive evidence. This systematic review investigates their effectiveness compared to placebo or usual care in head and neck surgery. METHODS: Studies comparing fibrin sealant to placebo or usual care in patients 18 years or older who have undergone soft tissue surgery of the head and neck with drain placement were included. Primary outcomes include wound complications and time to surgical drain removal postoperatively. Secondary outcomes include length of hospital stay, drain volume output, surgical management of hematoma, blood transfusion rates, and adverse reactions. Electronic databases were searched on October 2023 for randomized controlled and quasi-experimental studies. Studies underwent independent screening, review, and appraisal by two reviewers using JBI appraisal tools. Certainty was assessed with GRADE, and meta-analysis was conducted using JBI SUMARI, presenting effect sizes as relative risk ratios or mean differences with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Fourteen studies were included examining 904 patients. The fibrin sealant group exhibited reduced postoperative wound complications (hematoma, seroma, wound dehiscence, wound infection) (RR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.45-0.92), shorter drain removal times (MD = - 0.49 days, 95% CI = - 0.68 to - 0.29), decreased drain output (MD = - 16.52 mL, 95% CI = - 18.56 to - 14.52), and shorter hospital stay (MD = - 0.84 days, 95% CI = - 1.11 to - 0.57) compared to controls. There was no statistically significant difference on the rate of intervention for postoperative hematoma and the rate of adverse reactions. DISCUSSION: Evidence demonstrates with low certainty that fibrin sealant use is associated with a modest reduction in the rate of wound complications, drain duration, and length of stay, and a small reduction in drain volume output. Methodological weaknesses and clinical heterogeneity limit these findings. Further research should focus on enhancing methodological quality and exploring the cost-effectiveness of fibrin sealant use in surgery. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: CRD42023412820. FUNDING: Nil.


Subject(s)
Fibrin Tissue Adhesive , Length of Stay , Humans , Fibrin Tissue Adhesive/therapeutic use , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Drainage , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Head/surgery , Neck/surgery , Seroma/prevention & control , Hematoma/prevention & control
14.
Aust J Gen Pract ; 53(9): 640-646, 2024 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39226598

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Surgical site infection (SSI) after dermatological surgery is associated with poor outcomes. Developing clinical prediction rules based on the predicted probability of infection might encourage guided prophylaxis and judicious prescribing. The purpose of this study was to develop a clinical prediction rule based on identified risk factors for SSI in a large general practice patient cohort. METHOD: We examined a large, pooled dataset from four randomised controlled trials performed in a regional centre of North Queensland, Australia. Multivariable logistic regression identified a prediction model. Bootstrapping was used for internal validation. A scoring system was based on predicted probabilities of infection. RESULTS: The final prediction rule included age >55 years and the anatomical site, histology and complexity of the excision. The area under the curve was 0.704. DISCUSSION: Our prediction rule encourages judicious use of prophylaxis in clinical practice.


Subject(s)
General Practice , Surgical Wound Infection , Humans , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , General Practice/methods , General Practice/statistics & numerical data , Female , Middle Aged , Queensland , Male , Risk Factors , Aged , Adult , Minor Surgical Procedures/methods , Minor Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Minor Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Logistic Models , Clinical Decision Rules
15.
Neurosurg Rev ; 47(1): 546, 2024 Sep 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39235672

ABSTRACT

This study evaluates contemporary wound closure techniques in spinal surgery, focusing on the efficacy of barbed sutures, skin staples, and negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT), compared to traditional methods. Barbed sutures, like STRATAFIX™ Symmetric, and skin staples demonstrate significant advantages, including reduced wound closure time, lower infection rates, and improved surgical outcomes, particularly in multilevel or revisional procedures. In contrast, plastic surgery closures do not show a substantial reduction in postoperative complications despite being used in more complex cases. NPWT is highlighted as an effective adjunct therapy for managing surgical site infections and reducing the need for hardware removal. The findings suggest that while modern techniques offer clear benefits, traditional methods remain valuable in specific contexts. The review advocates for further research through large-scale, long-term studies and emphasizes the need for personalized wound closure strategies based on individual patient risk factors.


Subject(s)
Surgical Wound Infection , Wound Closure Techniques , Humans , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Neurosurgical Procedures/methods , Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy/methods , Spine/surgery , Sutures , Wound Healing/physiology , Treatment Outcome
16.
Syst Rev ; 13(1): 224, 2024 Sep 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39227872

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections continue to be a significant challenge following colorectal surgery. These can result in extended hospital stays, hospital readmissions, increased treatment costs, and negative effects on patients' quality of life. Antibiotic prophylaxis plays a crucial role in preventing infection during surgery, specifically in preventing surgical site infections after colorectal surgery in adult patients. However, the optimal antibiotic regimen is still unclear based on current evidence. Considering the limitations of existing reviews, our goal is to conduct a comprehensive systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to evaluate the comparative benefits and harms of available antibiotic prophylaxis regimens for preventing surgical site infections following colorectal surgery in adult patients. METHODS: We will search the Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases to identify relevant randomized controlled trials. We will include trials that (1) enrolled adults who underwent colorectal surgeries and (2) randomized them to any systemic administration of antibiotic (single or combined) prophylaxis before surgery compared to an alternative systemic antibiotic (single or combined antibiotic), placebo, control, or no prophylactic treatment. Pairs of reviewers will independently assess the risk of bias among eligible trials using a modified Cochrane risk of bias instrument for randomized trials. Our outcomes of interest include the rate of surgical site infection within 30 days of surgery, hospital length of stay, 30-day mortality, and treatment-related adverse effects. We will perform a contrast-based network meta-analysis using a frequentist random-effects model assuming a common heterogeneity parameter. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach will be utilized to assess the certainty of evidence for treatment effects. DISCUSSION: By synthesizing evidence from available RCTs, this study will provide valuable insight for clinicians, patients, and health policymakers on the most effective antibiotics for preventing surgical site infection. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42023434544.


Subject(s)
Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Network Meta-Analysis , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Surgical Wound Infection , Humans , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/methods , Systematic Reviews as Topic , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Colorectal Surgery/adverse effects
18.
BMC Surg ; 24(1): 252, 2024 Sep 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39251960

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infection (SSI) is not rare after loop ileostomy reversal. This study assessed the effects of a subcutaneous closed suction drain on reducing SSIs after loop ileostomy reversal with purse-string skin closure. METHODS: This retrospective study included 229 patients who underwent loop ileostomy reversal with purse-string closure at the Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital between January 2017 and December 2021. We divided the patients into those with a subcutaneous drain (SD group) and those without it (ND group). We analyzed variables that affected SSI occurrence in both groups. RESULTS: The SD and ND groups included 109 and 120 patients, respectively. The number of incisional SSIs was significantly lower in the SD than in the ND group (0 vs. 7 events). An average of 35.7 mL of fluid was collected in the drainage bulb during hospitalization. The C-reactive protein level on postoperative day 4 was significantly lower in the SD group than in the ND group. The insertion of a subcutaneous drain was the only factor associated with a reduced incidence of SSIs (p = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: Subcutaneous closed suction drain with purse-string skin closure in loop ileostomy reversal can reduce incisional SSI occurrence.


Subject(s)
Ileostomy , Surgical Wound Infection , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Surgical Wound Infection/etiology , Male , Female , Ileostomy/methods , Suction/methods , Middle Aged , Aged , Adult , Reoperation , Drainage/methods , Suture Techniques
19.
J Orthop Surg Res ; 19(1): 555, 2024 Sep 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39252068

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis aimed to explore the impact of prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) on the occurrence of deep surgical site infections (SSIs) following orthopedic surgery. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted across Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases for articles concerning NPWT in patients who underwent orthopedic surgery up to May 20, 2024. Using Stata 15.0, the combined odds ratios (ORs) were calculated with either a random-effects model or a fixed-effects model, depending on the heterogeneity values. RESULTS: From a total of 440 publications, studies that utilized NPWT as the experimental group and conventional dressings as the control group were selected to analyze their impact on SSIs. Ultimately, 32 studies met the inclusion criteria. These included 12 randomized controlled trials and 20 cohort studies, involving 7454 patients, with 3533 of whom received NPWT and 3921 of whom were treated with conventional dressings. The results of the meta-analysis demonstrated that the NPWT group had a lower incidence of deep SSIs in orthopedic surgeries than did the control group [OR 0.64, 95% CI (0.52, 0.80), P = 0.0001]. Subgroup analysis indicated a notable difference for trauma surgeries [OR 0.65, 95% CI (0.50, 0.83), P = 0.001], whereas joint surgeries [OR 0.65, 95% CI (0.38, 1.12), P = 0.122] and spine surgeries [OR 0.61, 95% CI (0.27, 1.35), P = 0.221] did not show significant differences. Additionally, when examined separately according to heterogeneity, trauma surgeries exhibited a significant difference [OR 0.50, 95% CI (0.31, 0.80), P = 0.004]. CONCLUSION: The results of our study indicate that the prophylactic use of NPWT reduces the incidence of deep SSIs following orthopedic trauma surgery when compared to the use of conventional dressings. We postulate that the prophylactic application of NPWT in patients at high risk of developing complications from bone trauma may result in improved clinical outcomes and an enhanced patient prognosis.


Subject(s)
Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy , Orthopedic Procedures , Surgical Wound Infection , Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy/methods , Humans , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Surgical Wound Infection/etiology , Orthopedic Procedures/adverse effects , Orthopedic Procedures/methods , Incidence , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Female , Male , Treatment Outcome , Bandages
20.
Neurosurg Rev ; 47(1): 630, 2024 Sep 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39284977

ABSTRACT

This retrospective study endeavors to scrutinize risk factors associated with infections resulting from external ventricular drainage (EVD) and to assess the effectiveness of chlorhexidine dressing in mitigating infection rates. Conducted from January 2018 to July 2023, this single-center study encompassed 108 EVD patients. Comprehensive data on demographics, comorbidities, surgical procedures, and the utilization of chlorhexidine dressing were meticulously compiled. The primary endpoint was the incidence of EVD-associated infections based on CDC criteria. Infection rates attributable to EVD were 24.32% without and 20.59% with chlorhexidine dressing. Notably, diabetes mellitus emerged as the solitary significant infection risk factor (p < 0.01). Although the application of chlorhexidine dressing suggested a propensity for diminishing infection rates, statistical significance remained elusive. No notable disparities were discerned in variables such as catheter type, procedural location, and underlying diseases. Diabetes mellitus has been identified as a significant risk factor for EVD-associated infections. While the utilization of chlorhexidine dressing exhibited a potential reduction in infection rates, the lack of statistical significance underscores the imperative for further research, encompassing more expansive randomized trials, to comprehensively evaluate the safety and efficacy of chlorhexidine dressings in preventing EVD-associated infections.


Subject(s)
Bandages , Chlorhexidine , Drainage , Humans , Chlorhexidine/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Adult , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/therapeutic use , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/administration & dosage , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Catheter-Related Infections/epidemiology , Aged, 80 and over
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL