Spontaneous pre-excited supraventricular tachycardias in a Labrador Retriever.

A four-year-old Labrador Retriever was presented for intermittent tachycardia. The electrocardiogram showed sinus rhythm conducted with ventricular pre-excitation and short runs of orthodromic atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia. Four months later, the rhythm degenerated into a symptomatic sustained tachycardia, suspected to be pre-excited atrial fibrillation, a potentially life-threatening rhythm in the presence of an accessory pathway with a short refractory period. Two days after initiating oral diltiazem, the dog deteriorated and represented with sustained orthodromic atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia, which was terminated by a precordial chest thump. It proceeded to sinus rhythm with ventricular pre-excitation followed by an episode of pre-excited focal atrial tachycardia. A bolus of lidocaine IV successfully restored sinus rhythm and sotalol treatment was started. The dog clinically recovered but died spontaneously 24 h later. This is the first case report that describes spontaneous pre-excited focal atrial tachycardia.

[Antiarrhythmic drugs in the present day]. / Antiarrhythmika in der heutigen Zeit.

Cardiac arrhythmias cause a significant proportion of hospitalizations and physician contacts worldwide. By using antiarrhythmic drugs, cardiac arrhythmias can be effectively treated and the frequency of recurrences reduced. Atrial fibrillation and heart failure represent diseases in which antiarrhythmic drugs are more often used on a long-term basis. The aim of this article is to provide an overview of the most common antiarrhythmic drugs and their uses as well as to provide recommendations for adequate handling and use, especially in the outpatient setting. In addition to long-term use, some antiarrhythmic drugs are also administered for the acute management of supraventricular or ventricular tachycardia. Relevant contraindications, side effects and interactions must be considered, meaning that patients should be followed up when using these potent drugs. This article shows in detail what to consider when using antiarrhythmic drugs in order to ensure not only effective but also safe treatment.

Intranasal etripamil for rapid treatment of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia.

Paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) is a common arrhythmia that, although usually benign, can occur unpredictably, cause disabling symptoms and significantly impair quality of life. If spontaneous resolution does not occur, the only current self-treatment is for the patient to attempt vagal maneuvers, however, these are frequently unsuccessful. Hospital attendance is then required for intravenous therapy. Etripamil, an intranasal calcium channel blocker similar to verapamil, may be able to fill this therapeutic gap, allowing rapid self-treatment of PSVT at home. This narrative review discusses the latest evidence for etripamil and its potential role in future clinical practice.

Paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) is an abnormal heart rhythm, causing the heart to beat rapidly. There are several ways to treat PSVT. This article discusses a new therapy, etripamil. One treatment involves breathing techniques called 'vagal maneuvers'. These avoid medication and sometimes stop the abnormal rhythm, however, in many cases, this does not work. An alternative is a tablet taken when symptoms occur. Unfortunately, tablets take time to absorb, meaning symptoms may continue until the medication takes effect, and this approach does not work for everyone. If these approaches fail, patients suffering from PSVT may need to seek treatment at a hospital. This may involve intravenous therapy, with certain drugs causing unpleasant sensations of chest discomfort. Some patients may also be kept in the hospital for monitoring. Although PSVT can often be cured via a catheter ablation procedure, this is invasive (involving wires inserted via veins in the groin), so not everyone wishes to pursue this, and in some cases, it cannot be performed safely. There is a need for a rapid, safe, and effective treatment that patients can administer at home when PSVT occurs. Etripamil shows promise. Because it is a nasal spray, etripamil allows rapid absorption into the body ­ much faster than a tablet. Etripamil is not yet available on the market; however, several studies have demonstrated its effectiveness and safety, so it may be available in the near future. Promising evidence for etripamil in certain groups, such as elderly patients, is still lacking.

Torsades de pointes and myocardial infarction following reversal of supraventricular tachycardia with adenosine: a case report.

Adenosine is an antiarrhythmic drug that slows conduction through the atrioventricular node and acts as a coronary blood vessel dilator. This case report highlights two unusual life-threatening events following the use of adenosine to revert supraventricular tachycardia in a structurally normal heart: non-sustained polymorphic ventricular tachycardia and myocardial infarction. A 46-year-old woman presented to the emergency department with a two-hour history of palpitations and was diagnosed with supraventricular tachycardia. Vagal maneuvers were ineffective, and after intravenous adenosine administration, the patient presented with chest pain and hypotension. The rhythm degenerated into non-sustained polymorphic ventricular tachycardia and spontaneously reverted to sinus rhythm with ST elevation in lead aVR and ST depression in the inferior and anterolateral leads. The patient spontaneously recovered within a few minutes. Despite successful arrhythmia reversal, the patient was admitted to the intensive care unit because of an infarction without obstructive atherosclerosis. This report aims to alert emergency physicians about the potential complications associated with supraventricular tachycardia and its reversal with adenosine.

Efficacy and safety of antiarrhythmic therapy in dogs with naturally acquired tachyarrhythmias treated with amiodarone or sotalol: a retrospective analysis of 64 cases.

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVE: Studies on the use of amiodarone or sotalol are limited in dogs. Therefore, this study aimed to provide data on the efficacy and safety of these drugs in dogs with ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VT) and/or supraventricular tachyarrhythmia (SvT). ANIMALS, MATERIALS, AND METHODS: Dogs with VT and/or SvT treated with amiodarone or sotalol as a first-line therapy were retrospectively evaluated. Signalment, clinical, diagnostic, therapeutic, and outcome data were retrieved. For VT, efficacy was demonstrated through a decrease of the Lown-Wolf grade to less than five or a reduction of at least 85% in the number of ventricular premature complexes observed on Holter monitoring. For SvT, efficacy was represented by cardioversion or a reduction in the mean heart rate on Holter monitoring ≤140 beats/min. Treatment-related side effects (TRSEs) were classified as clinically relevant and irrelevant. Statistical analysis was performed to compare data before and after antiarrhythmic prescription. RESULTS: Sixty-four dogs were included. Amiodarone and sotalol were efficacious in treating both VT (85.7% and 90.0% of cases, respectively) and SvT (75% and 71.4% of cases, respectively). No significant differences were found when comparing their efficacy rates in dogs with VT and SvT (P=0.531 and 0.483, respectively). Clinically relevant TRSEs were rare with both amiodarone and sotalol (8.3% and 5% of cases, respectively), while clinically irrelevant TRSEs occurred more frequently with amiodarone (29.2%) than with sotalol (10%). DISCUSSION: In dogs with tachyarrhythmias, amiodarone and sotalol are generally efficacious and safe, as clinically relevant TRSEs seem rare. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides novel data on the effects of amiodarone and sotalol in dogs with tachyarrhythmias.

Drugs associated with a risk of supraventricular tachycardia: analysis using the OpenVigil database.

OBJECTIVE: The OpenVigil database can be used to assess medications that may cause supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) and to produce a reference for their safe use in clinical settings. METHODS: We analyzed first-quarter data from 2004 to 2023, obtained by searching the OpenVigil database using the keyword "supraventricular tachycardia." Trade names and generic names were obtained by querying the RxNav database, and the proportions were summarized. The proportionate reporting ratio (PRR), reporting odds ratio, and chi-square values were also summarized. We created Asahi diagrams and set the screening criteria to drug events ≥30, PRR >2, and chi-square >4. Outcomes were evaluated using the Side Effect Resource database, several scientific literature databases, and the Hangzhou Yiyao Rational Medication System. RESULTS: A total of 2435 distinct medications were found to induce SVT between the first quarter of 2004 and 2023, leading to 22,375 documented adverse events related to SVT. Further investigation revealed that salbutamol, paroxetine, formoterol, paclitaxel, venlafaxine, and theophylline were most likely to cause SVT. CONCLUSION: We conducted signal mining of adverse drug events using the OpenVigil database and evaluated the six drugs most likely to cause SVT. The results of this research can serve as a drug safety reference in the clinic.

Resource Use and Clinical Outcomes in Infants with Supraventricular Tachycardia Monitored with the Owlet Smart Sock.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the prevalence of Owlet Smart Sock (OSS) use in infants with supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) and associated demographic and clinical characteristics of users and to analyze the association of OSS use on medical resource use and clinical outcomes from emergency department (ED) encounters for SVT. STUDY DESIGN: This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of infants with confirmed SVT from 2015 to 2022. OSS users and nonusers were compared across clinical and demographic parameters. Medical resource use (phone calls, office visits, ED visits) and outcomes (need for intensive care, length of stay, echocardiographic function, clinical appearance) were compared between OSS users and nonusers. RESULTS: Of 133 infants with SVT, OSS was used by 31 of 133 (23%), purchased before SVT diagnosis in 5 in 31 (16%) of users. No demographic difference was found between OSS users and nonusers. OSS users had more phone notes than nonusers, (P = .002) and more ED visits (P = .03), but the number of office visits and medication adjustments did not differ. During ED presentation, OSS users had better preserved left ventricular ejection fraction on echocardiogram (P = .04) and lower length of hospital stay by a mean 1.7 days (P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: OSS is used by a portion of infants with SVT. It is associated with more frequent phone calls and ED visits but lower length of stay and better-preserved cardiac function upon presentation.

The outcomes of patients with septic shock treated with propafenone compared to amiodarone for supraventricular arrhythmias are related to end-systolic left atrial volume.

AIMS: A recently published trial has shown no differences in outcomes between patients with new-onset supraventricular arrhythmia (SVA) in septic shock treated with either propafenone or amiodarone. However, these outcome data have not been evaluated in relation to the presence or absence of a dilated left atrium (LA). METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with SVA and a left ventricular ejection fraction ≥ 35% were randomized to receive intravenous propafenone (70 mg bolus followed by 400-840 mg/24 h) or amiodarone (300 mg bolus followed by 600-1800 mg/24 h). They were divided into groups based on whether their end-systolic left atrial volume (LAVI) was ≥40 mL/m². The subgroup outcomes assessed were survival at ICU discharge, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months. Propafenone cardioverted earlier (P = 0.009) and with fewer recurrences (P = 0.001) in the patients without LA enlargement (n = 133). Patients with LAVI < 40 mL/m2 demonstrated a mortality benefit of propafenone over the follow-up of 1 year [Cox regression, hazard ratio (HR) 0.6 (95% CI 0.4; 0.9), P = 0.014]. Patients with dilated LA (n = 37) achieved rhythm control earlier in amiodarone (P = 0.05) with similar rates of recurrences (P = 0.5) compared to propafenone. The outcomes for patients with LAVI ≥ 40 mL/m2 were less favourable with propafenone compared to amiodarone at 1 month [HR 3.6 (95% CI 1.03; 12.5), P = 0.045]; however, it did not reach statistical significance at 1 year [HR 1.9 (95% CI 0.8; 4.4), P = 0.138]. CONCLUSION: Patients with non-dilated LA who achieved rhythm control with propafenone in the setting of septic shock had better short-term and long-term outcomes than those treated with amiodarone, which seemed to be more effective in patients with LAVI ≥ 40 mL/m². TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03029169, registered on 24 January 2017.

Plain language summary of the safety and effectiveness of etripamil for atrioventricular-nodal-dependent supraventricular tachycardia: the RAPID study.

WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?: This is a plain language summary of a clinical research study called RAPID. The study looked at the potential for how safe and effective etripamil was at stopping an episode of rapid heartbeats in people with atrioventricularnodal-dependent supraventricular tachycardia (AV-node-dependent SVT). An episode is used to describe the period of time when a person experiences an abnormally very fast heartbeat. This was done by comparing an investigational drug called etripamil with a placebo, each administered via a rapidly acting nasal spray. AV-node-dependent SVT affects the rhythm of the heart, causing it to suddenly beat rapidly. The condition often requires medical treatment to help return the heart to its normal, healthy heartbeat pattern and speed, called 'sinus rhythm'. Researchers are looking at ways of improving the management of supraventricular tachycardias (SVT) by reducing the need for patients to attend an urgent care clinic, emergency ward or hospital for treatment. In the RAPID study, participants used a nasal spray containing either 70 mg etripamil or a placebo solution when they experienced an episode of SVT. The researchers wanted to know how long it took for each participant's rapid heartbeat to return to sinus rhythm after administering the etripamil or placebo nasal spray. Participants in the study were considered successfully treated if their heartbeats returned to sinus rhythm for at least 30 seconds within 30 minutes of using the nasal spray. Although 30 seconds may seem brief, it's medically important because it shows that a person's heartbeat has been temporarily stabilized and returned to normal functioning. WHAT WERE THE RESULTS?: Out of 99 people who used etripamil during an SVT episode, 63 participants (64%) experienced a return to sinus rhythm for at least 30 seconds within 30 minutes after using the nasal spray. In contrast, 26 out of 85 participants (31%) who used the placebo nasal spray experienced a return to sinus rhythm for at least 30 seconds within 30 minutes after use. Furthermore, the average time taken for the return to sinus rhythm was 17 minutes for the etripamil group which was 3-times faster than the placebo group at 53 minutes. Also, in the study no serious side effects occurred that were related to etripamil. WHAT DO THE RESULTS OF THE STUDY MEAN?: The RAPID study supports the potential that etripamil may be safe and well tolerated by participants as a treatment for episodes of rapid heartbeat in people with AV-node-dependent SVT. The results also showed a significant improvement in symptoms following treatment with etripamil.

Combined modified Valsalva maneuver with adenosine supraventricular tachycardia: A comparative study.

BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE: Paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) is an arrhythmia commonly seen in the emergency department. Both modified Valsalva maneuver (MVM) and intravenous adenosine are the first line treatment, of which the former has e lower success rate while the latter has a higher success rate but some risks and adverse effects. Given both of these reverse rhythms quickly, combining them may achieve a better effect. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to evaluate the success rate and potential risk of combining the use of intravenous adenosine while patients were doing MVM as a treatment for paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia(pSVT). DESIGN, SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS: We recruited patients with pSVT from 2017 to 2022, and randomly assigned them into 3 groups, MVM group, intravenous adenosine group, and combination therapy group, in which MVM was allowed to be performed twice, while intravenous adenosine was given in a titration manner to repeat three times, recorded the success rate and side effects in each group. MAIN RESULTS: The success rate of the MVM group, adenosine group, and combination group are 42.11%, 75.00 and 86.11%, respectively. The success rate of the adenosine group and combination group is significantly higher than the n MVSM group (p < 0.01, p < 0.001), while the success rate of the combination group is higher than the adenosine group, it has no significant difference (p = 0.340). In terms of safety, the longest RR durations (asystole period) are 1.61 s, 1.60s, and 2.27 s, there is a statistical difference among the three groups (p < 0.01) and between the adenosine and combination group (0.018). CONCLUSION: Therefore, we can conclude that combination therapy has a relatively high success rate and good safety profile, but the current study failed to show its superiority to adenosine.

Rationale and design of the NODE-303 study: evaluating the safety of symptom-prompted, self-administered etripamil for paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia episodes in real-world settings.

BACKGROUND: Paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) is a common episodic arrhythmia characterized by unpredictable onset and burdensome symptoms including palpitations, dizziness, chest pain, distress, and shortness of breath. Treatment of acute episodes of PSVT in the clinical setting consists of intravenous adenosine, beta-blockers, and calcium channel blockers (CCBs). Etripamil is an intranasally self-administered L-type CCB in development for acute treatment of AV-nodal dependent PSVT in a nonmedical supervised setting. METHODS: This paper summarizes the rationale and study design of NODE-303 that will assess the efficacy and safety of etripamil. In the randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, Phase 3 RAPID trial, etripamil was superior to placebo in the conversion of single PSVT episodes by 30 minutes post initial dose when administered in the nonhealthcare setting; this study required a mandatory and observed test dosing prior to randomization. The primary objective of NODE-303 is to evaluate the safety of symptom-prompted, self-administered etripamil for multiple PSVT episodes in real-world settings, without the need for test dosing prior to first use during PSVT. Secondary endpoints include efficacy and disease burden. Upon perceiving a PSVT episode, the patient applies an electrocardiographic monitor, performs a vagal maneuver, and, if the vagal maneuver is unsuccessful, self-administers etripamil 70 mg, with an optional repeat dose if symptoms do not resolve within 10 minutes after the first dose. A patient may treat up to four PSVT episodes during the study. Adverse events are recorded as treatment-emergent if they occur within 24 hours after the administration of etripamil. RESULTS: Efficacy endpoints include time to conversion to sinus rhythm within 30 and 60 minutes after etripamil administration, and the proportion of patients who convert at 3, 5, 10, 20, 30, and 60 minutes. Patient-reported outcomes are captured by the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire, the Cardiac Anxiety Questionnaire, the Short Form Health Survey 36, the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication and a PSVT survey. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, these data will support the development of a potentially paradigm-changing long-term management strategy for recurrent PSVT.

Impact of dexmedetomidine on electrophysiological properties and arrhythmia inducibility in adult patients referred for reentrant supraventricular tachycardia ablation.

BACKGROUND: Drugs used for sedation/analgesia may affect the basic cardiac electrophysiologic properties or even supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) inducibility. Dexmedetomidine (DEX) is a selective alpha-2 adrenergic agonist with sedative and analgesic properties. A comprehensive evaluation on use of DEX for reentrant SVT ablation in adults is lacking. The present study aims to systematically assess the impact of DEX on cardiac electrophysiology and SVT inducibility. METHODS: Hemodynamic, electrocardiographic, and electrophysiological parameters and SVT inducibility were assessed before and after DEX infusion in patients scheduled for ablation of reentrant SVT. RESULTS: The population of this prospective observational study included 55 patients (mean age of 58.7 ± 14 years, 29 males [52.7%]). A decrease in systolic and diastolic blood pressure and in heart rate was observed after DEX infusion (p = 0.001 for all). DEX increased corrected sinus node refractory time, atrial effective refractory period, AH interval, AV Wenckebach cycle length, and AV node effective refractory period without affecting the His-Purkinje conduction or ventricular myocardium refractoriness. No AV blocks or sinus arrests occurred during DEX infusion. Globally, there was no difference in SVT inducibility in basal condition or after DEX infusion (46/55 [83.6%] vs. 43/55 [78.1%] patients; p = 0.55), without a difference in isoprenaline use (p = 1.0). In 4 (7.3%) cases, the SVT was inducible only after DEX infusion. In 34.5% of cases, DEX infusion unmasked the presence of an obstructive sleeping respiratory pattern, represented mainly by snoring. CONCLUSIONS: DEX depresses sinus node function and prolongs atrioventricular refractoriness without significantly affecting the rate of SVT inducibility in patients scheduled for reentrant SVT ablation.

Two decades of SVT ablation in Denmark: a trend towards higher age, more comorbidity, and less prior use of antiarrhythmic and rate-limiting pharmacotherapy-a nationwide registry-based Danish study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Trends in patient selection and use of pharmacotherapy prior to catheter ablation (CA) for supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) are not well described. This study examined temporal trends in patients undergoing first-time CA for regular SVT, including atrioventricular nodal re-entry tachycardia (AVNRT), accessory pathways (APs), and ectopic atrial tachycardia (EAT) on a nationwide scale in Denmark in the period 2001-2018. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using Danish Nationwide registers, 9959 patients treated with first-time CA for SVT between 2001 and 2018 were identified, of which 6023 (61%) received CA for AVNRT, 2829 (28%) for AP, and 1107 (11%) for EAT. Median age was 55, 42, and 55 in the AVNRT, APs, and EAT group, respectively. The number of patients receiving CA increased from 1195 between 2001 and 2003 to 1914 between 2016 and 2018. The percentage of patients with a CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥ 2 increased in all patient groups. The number of patients who underwent CA with no prior use of antiarrhythmic- or rate limiting medicine increased significantly, though prior use of beta-blockers increased for AVNRT patients. Use of verapamil decreased in all three SVT groups (P < 0.05). Use of amiodarone and class 1C antiarrhythmics remained low, with the highest usage among EAT patients. CONCLUSION: Between 2001 and 2018, CA was increasingly performed in patients with SVT, primarily AVNRT- and EAT patients. The burden of comorbidities increased. Patients undergoing CA without prior antiarrhythmic- or rate-limiting drug therapy increased significantly. Use of beta-blockers increased and remained the most widely used drug.

Rediscover the predictive capacity of B-type natriuretic peptide applied to neonatal supraventricular tachycardia.

BACKGROUND: Supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) is one of the most common non-benign arrhythmias in neonates, potentially leading to cardiac decompensation. This study investigated the early risk factors of acute heart failure (AHF) secondary to SVT in neonates, and explored their value in guiding the selection of effective anti-arrhythmic treatment. METHODS: A total of 43 newborns diagnosed with and treated for SVT between January 2017 and December 2022 were analyzed. According to the presence of AHF after restoring sinus rhythm in newborns with SVT, they were divided into SVT with AHF group and SVT without AHF group. Clinical data and anti-arrhythmic therapies were analyzed. Risk factors of AHF secondary to SVT in neonates were determined using logistic regression. The cut-off value for predictors of AHF secondary to SVT and demanding of a second-line anti-arrhythmic treatment was determined through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: Time to initial control of tachycardia > 24 h, hyperkalemia, anemia, and plasma B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) were identified as risk factors of AHF secondary to SVT in neonates. BNP exhibited AUC of 0.80 in predicting AHF, and BNP > 2460.5pg/ml (OR 2.28, 95% CI 1.27 ~ 45.39, P = 0.03) was an independent predictor, yielding sensitivity of 70.6% and specificity of 84.6%. Neonates with BNP > 2460.5pg/ml (37.5% versus 7.4%, P = 0.04) had a higher demand for a second line anti-arrhythmic treatment to terminate SVT, with sensitivity and specificity for BNP in predicting at 75.0%, 71.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: BNP could be used to predict an incident of AHF secondary to SVT and a demand of second-line anti-arrhythmic treatment to promptly terminate SVT and prevent decompensation in neonates.

Management of acute supraventricular tachycardia in children.

QUESTION: Recently, a 3-year-old patient in my practice urgently needed to go to the emergency department. The patient was found to have supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) and needed immediate treatment with adenosine. What evidence is currently available for management of SVT in children? ANSWER: Supraventricular tachycardia is a common cardiac condition in the pediatric population that manifests as a narrow QRS complex tachycardia on electrocardiography. Symptoms may range from palpitations, poor feeding, and irritability to more substantial hemodynamic instability. Patients who are hemodynamically stable can benefit from interventions such as vagal maneuvers, which can be done in the office. Such maneuvers include the Valsalva maneuver, stimulation of the diving reflex (for infants), and unilateral carotid sinus massage. Other children may need pharmacologic therapies to restore normal heart rhythm, which usually consists of a rapid intravenous injection of adenosine under monitoring. For patients who are hemodynamically unstable, emergency cardioversion may be needed.

Refractory supraventricular fetal tachycardia as a cause of non-immune hydrops: management conundrum.

Supraventricular tachyarrhythmia (SVT) is the most common form of fetal tachyarrhythmias. The presentation can vary from ill-defined, non-sustained episodes of tachyarrhythmia to frank non-immune hydrops. The standard of care is transplacental therapy by treating the mother with oral antiarrhythmic drugs, followed by direct fetal therapy in refractory cases. We report a case of primigravida in her late 20s, who presented at 28.1 weeks of gestation with fetal hydrops and SVT. She was initially managed with oral digoxin and flecainide, but due to worsening hydrops, risk of fetal demise and extreme prematurity, further management by direct fetal therapy was given in terms of intramuscular digoxin and intraperitoneal flecainide. Following which, the fetus had a favourable outcome. This case highlights the possible role of direct fetal therapy in refractory cases of SVT.