ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Tardive dyskinesia (TD) and Huntington's disease (HD)-associated chorea are persistent and disabling hyperkinetic disorders that can be treated with vesicular monoamine transporter type 2 (VMAT2) inhibitors, including the recently approved once-daily (QD) formulation of deutetrabenazine (DTBZ ER). While its efficacy and safety profile have not been directly investigated, currently available data confirms bioequivalence and similar bioavailability to the twice-daily formulation (DTBZ BID). AREAS COVERED: The authors briefly review the pivotal trials establishing efficacy of DTBZ for TD and HD-associated chorea, the pharmacokinetic data for bioequivalence between QD and BID dosing of DTBZ, as well as dose proportionality evidence, titration recommendations, and safety profile for DTBZ ER. EXPERT OPINION: Long-term data show that DTBZ is efficacious and well tolerated for the treatment of TD and HD-associated chorea. DTBZ ER likely demonstrates therapeutic equivalence with no new safety signals. Due to the lack of comparative clinical trial data, no evidence-based recommendation about choice of VMAT2 inhibitor or switching between VMAT2 inhibitors can be made about best practice. Ultimately, QD dosing may offer the chance of improved medication adherence, an important consideration in patients with complex treatment regimens and/or patients with cognitive decline.
Subject(s)
Delayed-Action Preparations , Huntington Disease , Tardive Dyskinesia , Tetrabenazine , Humans , Huntington Disease/drug therapy , Huntington Disease/complications , Tardive Dyskinesia/drug therapy , Tetrabenazine/analogs & derivatives , Tetrabenazine/therapeutic use , Tetrabenazine/administration & dosage , Tetrabenazine/pharmacokinetics , Tetrabenazine/adverse effects , Chorea/drug therapy , Vesicular Monoamine Transport Proteins/antagonists & inhibitors , Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors/pharmacokinetics , Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors/adverse effects , TabletsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: There is little information on using clozapine in elderly patients with mental disorders from India. AIM: To evaluate the sociodemographic and clinical profile of elderly (age ≥ 60 years) patients started on clozapine. METHODOLOGY: The clozapine registry in the department was screened to identify elderly patients who were started on clozapine. Treatment records of these patients were reviewed to extract sociodemographic and clinical details. RESULTS: Out of the available information of 1058 patients in the registry, 42 (3.96â¯%) were elderly (≥ 60 years) patients. About two-thirds of the patients had treatment resistance, i.e., their psychotic illness had not responded to two adequate trials of antipsychotics, and the second most common indication for starting clozapine was tardive dystonia or tardive dyskinesia (23.8â¯%). The mean dose of clozapine was 135.89 (SD: 109.6; Range: 37.5-500; median: 87.5) mg/day. The mean duration of clozapine use at the time of data extraction for the study sample was 3.55 (SD: 2.15; Range 0.3-9; median: 3) years. At the last follow-up, about three-fourths of patients were experiencing at least one side effect, with constipation being the most common side effect, followed by sedation, weight gain, and hypersalivation. In only four patients, clozapine was stopped during the follow-up. In terms of effectiveness, majority of the patients were rated as much improved or very much improved on Clinical Global Impression-Improvement subscale. CONCLUSION: Clozapine can be safely used in elderly patients with mental disorders. Hence, clozapine should not be withheld in elderly patients with mental disorders whenever indicated.
Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Clozapine , Humans , Clozapine/administration & dosage , Clozapine/adverse effects , Aged , Antipsychotic Agents/administration & dosage , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Male , Female , Middle Aged , India , Psychotic Disorders/drug therapy , Aged, 80 and over , Registries , Mental Disorders/drug therapy , Tardive Dyskinesia/drug therapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Deutetrabenazine is approved for adults with tardive dyskinesia (TD). Data based on underlying psychiatric condition and baseline dopamine receptor antagonist (DRA) use are limited. METHODS: Patients with TD who completed parent studies ARM-TD or AIM-TD were eligible for the 3-year, open-label extension study (RIM-TD; NCT02198794). In RIM-TD, deutetrabenazine was titrated based on dyskinesia control and tolerability. In this post hoc analysis of RIM-TD, total motor Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) score and adverse events (AEs) were analyzed by underlying condition and DRA use at parent study baseline. RESULTS: Of 343 patients enrolled in RIM-TD, 336 were included in the analysis by underlying condition, and 337 were included in the analysis by DRA use. One hundred eighty-nine of 205 (92%) patients with psychotic disorders (schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder) and 65 of 131 (50%) with mood and other disorders (depression/bipolar disorder/other) were receiving a DRA. Mean (SE) deutetrabenazine doses at week 145 were 40.4 (1.13), 38.5 (1.21), 39.9 (1.00), and 38.5 (1.48) mg/d for patients with psychotic disorders, those with mood and other disorders, and those receiving DRAs or not, respectively. Mean (SD) changes in total motor AIMS score from this study baseline to week 145 were -6.3 (4.53), -7.1 (4.92), -6.1 (4.42), and -7.5 (5.19). Exposure-adjusted incidence rates (number of AEs/patient-years) of AEs were similar across groups: any (1.02, 1.71, 1.08, 1.97), serious (0.10, 0.12, 0.10, 0.12), and leading to discontinuation (0.07, 0.05, 0.06, 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term deutetrabenazine provided clinically meaningful improvements in TD-related movements, with a favorable benefit-risk profile, regardless of underlying condition or DRA use.
Subject(s)
Dopamine Antagonists , Tardive Dyskinesia , Tetrabenazine , Humans , Tardive Dyskinesia/drug therapy , Tardive Dyskinesia/chemically induced , Male , Female , Tetrabenazine/analogs & derivatives , Tetrabenazine/pharmacology , Tetrabenazine/adverse effects , Tetrabenazine/administration & dosage , Middle Aged , Adult , Dopamine Antagonists/adverse effects , Dopamine Antagonists/administration & dosage , Dopamine Antagonists/pharmacology , Psychotic Disorders/drug therapy , Aged , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Antipsychotic Agents/administration & dosage , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
PURPOSE/BACKGROUND: Using data from KINECT® 4, a phase 3, 48-week study of valbenazine, post hoc analyses were conducted to assess long-term outcomes that are relevant to the real-world management of tardive dyskinesia (TD). METHODS/PROCEDURES: Post hoc analyses of the participants of the KINECT 4 study who completed 48 weeks of open-label valbenazine (40 or 80 mg) treatment were conducted. Valbenazine effects on TD were evaluated using the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS), Clinical Global Impression of Change-TD (CGI-TD), and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC). FINDINGS/RESULTS: Of 103 participants completing 48 weeks of treatment, 55% experienced clinically meaningful improvement (defined as ≥2-point reduction in AIMS total score [sum of items 1 - 7, evaluated by site raters]) by week 4; at week 48, 97% met this threshold. The percentage of completers who achieved AIMS total score response thresholds of ≥10% to ≥90% increased over time, with 86% of completers reaching ≥50% improvement. Of the 40 (39%) completers with AIMS ≥50% response at week 8, 38 (95%) sustained this response at week 48; 81% of those who did not meet this threshold at week 8 had achieved it by week 48. At week 48, more than 85% of completers achieved CGI-TD and PGIC ratings of "much improved" or "very much improved." IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS: The majority of participants who completed 48 weeks of treatment with once-daily valbenazine experienced substantial clinically meaningful and sustained TD improvements. These findings indicate that valbenazine can be a highly effective long-term treatment in patients with TD.
Subject(s)
Tardive Dyskinesia , Tetrabenazine , Valine , Humans , Tetrabenazine/analogs & derivatives , Tetrabenazine/pharmacology , Tetrabenazine/administration & dosage , Tetrabenazine/adverse effects , Tardive Dyskinesia/drug therapy , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Valine/analogs & derivatives , Valine/administration & dosage , Valine/pharmacology , Valine/adverse effects , Aged , Treatment Outcome , Adult , Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Antipsychotic Agents/administration & dosageABSTRACT
Background: Tardive Dyskinesia (TD) is a neurological disorder characterized by involuntary movements, often caused by dopamine receptor antagonists. Vesicular Monoamine Transporter 2 (VMAT2) inhibitors, such as valbenazine and deutetrabenazine, have emerged as promising therapies for TD and several clinical trials have shown their efficacy. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety profile of VMAT2 inhibitors, focusing on a recent trial conducted in the Asian population. Methods: We reviewed the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase database, and clinicaltrials.gov between January 2017 and October 2023, using the keywords "tardive dyskinesia" AND ("valbenazine" [all fields] OR " deutetrabenazine " [all fields]) AND "clinical trial". The reviewed articles were studied for efficacy and side effects. Results: An initial search yielded 230 articles, of which 104 were duplicates. Following the title and abstract screening, 25 additional articles were excluded. A full-text review resulted in the exclusion of 96 more articles. Ultimately, four double-blind clinical trials met the inclusion criteria. The deutetrabenazine studies demonstrated significant improvements in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) scores compared to placebo, with no difference in adverse events. The valbenazine studies showed favorable results in reducing TD symptoms and were well-tolerated. Discussion: The studies reviewed in this analysis underscore the potential of deutetrabenazine and valbenazine as valuable treatment options for TD in diverse populations. Both medications demonstrated significant improvements in AIMS scores, suggesting their effectiveness in managing TD symptoms. Additionally, they exhibited favorable safety profiles, with low rates of serious adverse events and no significant increase in QT prolongation, parkinsonism, suicidal ideation, or mortality. Conclusion: The studies reviewed highlight the promising efficacy and tolerability of deutetrabenazine and valbenazine as treatments for Tardive Dyskinesia, providing new hope for individuals affected by this challenging condition.
Subject(s)
Tardive Dyskinesia , Tetrabenazine , Valine , Humans , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Tardive Dyskinesia/drug therapy , Tardive Dyskinesia/chemically induced , Tetrabenazine/adverse effects , Tetrabenazine/analogs & derivatives , Tetrabenazine/therapeutic use , Valine/analogs & derivatives , Vesicular Monoamine Transport ProteinsABSTRACT
Drug-induced movement disorders (DIMDs) are associated with use of dopamine receptor blocking agents (DRBAs), including antipsychotics. The most common forms are drug-induced parkinsonism (DIP), dystonia, akathisia, and tardive dyskinesia (TD). Although rare, neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) is a potentially life-threatening consequence of DRBA exposure. Recommendations for anticholinergic use in patients with DIMDs were developed on the basis of a roundtable discussion with healthcare professionals with extensive expertise in DIMD management, along with a comprehensive literature review. The roundtable agreed that "extrapyramidal symptoms" is a non-specific term that encompasses a range of abnormal movements. As such, it contributes to a misconception that all DIMDs can be treated in the same way, potentially leading to the misuse and overprescribing of anticholinergics. DIMDs are neurobiologically and clinically distinct, with different treatment paradigms and varying levels of evidence for anticholinergic use. Whereas evidence indicates anticholinergics can be effective for DIP and dystonia, they are not recommended for TD, akathisia, or NMS; nor are they supported for preventing DIMDs except in individuals at high risk for acute dystonia. Anticholinergics may induce serious peripheral adverse effects (e.g., urinary retention) and central effects (e.g., impaired cognition), all of which can be highly concerning especially in older adults. Appropriate use of anticholinergics therefore requires careful consideration of the evidence for efficacy (e.g., supportive for DIP but not TD) and the risks for serious adverse events. If used, anticholinergic medications should be prescribed at the lowest effective dose and for limited periods of time. When discontinued, they should be tapered gradually.
Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Dystonia , Dystonic Disorders , Movement Disorders , Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome , Tardive Dyskinesia , Humans , Aged , Dystonia/chemically induced , Dystonia/drug therapy , Cholinergic Antagonists/adverse effects , Psychomotor Agitation/drug therapy , Movement Disorders/drug therapy , Movement Disorders/etiology , Tardive Dyskinesia/chemically induced , Tardive Dyskinesia/drug therapy , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effectsABSTRACT
RATIONALE: Dopamine antagonists induce dopamine receptor supersensitivity. This may manifest in late-appearing movement disorders (tardive dyskinesia (TD). VMAT-2 inhibitors reduce dopaminergic transmission but have limited activity at postsynaptic receptors and so may have antipsychotic activity with lower risk of tardive dyskinesia. METHODS: We conducted a systematic database search from inception to September 2022 for articles describing the use of VMAT-2 inhibitors in psychosis. Inclusion criteria were as follows: Population: adults diagnosed with psychosis or schizophrenia; Intervention: treatment with tetrabenazine, deutetrabenazine or valbenazine; Comparison: comparison with placebo or/and antipsychotic drug; Outcomes: with efficacy outcomes (e.g. Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) change or clinician assessment) and adverse effects ratings (e.g. rating scale or clinician assessment or dropouts); and Studies: in randomised controlled trials and non-randomised studies. RESULTS: We identified 4892 records relating to VMAT-2 inhibitor use of which 5 (173 participants) met our a priori meta-analysis inclusion criteria. VMAT-2 inhibitors were more effective than placebo for the outcome 'slight improvement' (risk ratio (RR) = 1.77 (95% CI 1.03, 3.04)) but not for 'moderate improvement' (RR 2.81 (95% CI 0.27, 29.17). VMAT-2 inhibitors were as effective as active comparators on both measures for-'slight improvement' (RR 1.05 (95% CI 0.6, 1.81)) and 'moderate improvement' (RR 1.11 (95% CI 0.51, 2.42). Antipsychotic efficacy was also suggested by a narrative review of 37 studies excluded from the meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS: VMAT-2 inhibitors may have antipsychotic activity and may offer promise for treatment of psychosis with the potential for a reduced risk of TD.