Is the Supraclavicular Approach Effective in Treating Patients with Thoracic Outlet Syndrome?

Thoracic outlet syndrome is a challenging clinical condition in terms of diagnosis, treatment, and health-related quality of life assessment. In this review, the authors provide a description of the clinical approach, surgical management, and longitudinal follow-up for patients with neurogenic, venous, and arterial thoracic outlet syndrome. The review represents the experiences of a high-volume, dedicated thoracic outlet syndrome program, where patients are treated in a multidisciplinary team and operative decompression occurs through primarily a supraclavicular approach. Data supporting the safety and efficacy of this approach are provided, as are clinical care considerations for surgeons treating patients with thoracic outlet syndrome.

Cross-cultural adaptation of the Thoracic Outlet Syndrome Index for Turkish-speaking patients with thoracic outlet syndrome.

Background/aim: Considering that there is no specifically designed scale to measure quality of life (QoL) and level of functioning among Turkish-speaking patients with thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS), the aim of this study was to adapt the Thoracic Outlet Syndrome Index (TOSI) to the Turkish language (TOSI-TR) and analyze its psychometric properties in patients with TOS. Materials and methods: Thirty-nine patients with symptomatic TOS were included in the study. The participants were assessed using the following measures: the QuickDASH, the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC), and a visual analog scale (VAS). The psychometric properties of the TOSI-TR were examined in terms of test-retest reliability, construct validity, convergent validity, and feasibility. Results: The ICC2,1 of the TOSI-TR was 0.949 (95% CI: 0.903-0.973). The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin value was found to be 0.716 with a significant result for Bartlett's sphericity test (p < 0.001). The TOSI-TR had a one-factor solution explaining 74.05% of the total variance. There was a significant correlation between TOSI-TR scores and QuickDASH (r = 0.762, p < 0.001), WORC (r =0.794, p < 0.001), and VAS (r = 0.663, p < 0.001) scores. The WORC and VAS scores were significant determinants of the TOSI-TR score, explaining 65.3% of the variance. There were no floor or ceiling effects. Conclusion: The TOSI-TR is a reliable, valid, and feasible questionnaire for the QoL and functional status in Turkish-speaking patients with TOS. We recommend this 15-item scale for optimal assessment in patients with TOS.

Pediatric thoracic outlet syndrome: a systematic review with metadata.

INTRODUCTION: Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) typically considered a condition of the adult population; it is often disregarded in children and adolescents due to its limited recognition within the pediatrics. The current study aims to systematically review and provide insights into TOS among pediatric patients. METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases were thoroughly searched for English language studies published until March 15th, 2024. The study included those articles focusing on pediatric or adolescent individuals diagnosed with TOS. Data collected from studies encompassed date of publication, number of participants or reported cases, age (years), gender of participants, type of TOS, affected side, type of treatment, surgical approach, bony abnormality, duration of symptoms (months), outcome, and follow-up time duration (months). RESULTS: The current study comprised 33 articles, 21 of which were case reports, 10 of which were case series, and the remaining were cohort studies. In this study, 356 patients were included. Females constituted 234 (65.73%) of the patient population. Among TOS types, neurogenic TOS was found among 201 (56.5%) patients. Sporting-related activity or physical activity was present in 193 (54%) patients, followed by a history of trauma in 27 (7%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric patients exhibited a higher percentage of vascular TOS than their adult counterparts, with the supraclavicular approach emerging as the preferred treatment method. Sports-related activities were identified as the primary risk factor associated with pediatric TOS.

Current Clinical Concepts: Rehabilitation of Thoracic Outlet Syndrome.

Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) involves inconsistent symptoms, presenting a challenge for medical providers to diagnose and treat. Thoracic outlet syndrome is defined as a compression injury to the brachial plexus, subclavian artery or vein, or axillary artery or vein occurring between the cervical spine and upper extremity. Three common subcategories are now used for clinical diagnosis: neurogenic, arterial, and venous. Postural position and repetitive motions such as throwing, weightlifting, and manual labor can lead to symptoms. Generally, TOS is considered a diagnosis of exclusion for athletes due to the poor accuracy of clinical testing, including sensitivity and specificity. Thus, determining a definitive diagnosis and reporting injury is difficult. Current literature suggests there is not a gold standard diagnostic test. Rehabilitation has been shown to be a vital component in the recovery process for neurogenic TOS and for arterial TOS and venous TOS in postoperative situations.

Challenges and Advances in the Diagnosis and Management of Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Comprehensive Review.

Neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (nTOS) is caused by brachial plexus compression in the thoracic outlet. It accounts for 85%-95% of thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) cases, which may also be caused by compression of the subclavian artery and vein. Compression occurs in the interscalene triangle, costoclavicular space or subpectoralis minor space, with congenital anomalies and repetitive overhead activities as contributing factors. Diagnosis is challenging due to overlapping symptoms with other conditions. Patients commonly report pain, numbness, tingling and weakness in the neck, shoulder and arm, exacerbated by arm elevation. Symptoms related to nTOS may manifest in the distribution of the upper (C5-C6), middle (C7) and lower plexus (C8-T1). Although widely used, provocative tests have varying degrees of sensitivity and specificity and may have high false-positive rates, complicating the diagnosis. Patterns on electrodiagnostic studies provide key diagnostic clues, such as reduced sensory response in the medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve and low compound motor action potential in the median nerve. Imaging techniques like magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), alongside procedures like diagnostic and therapeutic anterior scalene blocks, assist in identifying anatomical abnormalities and predicting surgical outcomes. Management of nTOS involves lifestyle changes, physical therapy, medication and botulinum toxin injections for symptomatic relief. Surgical options may include supraclavicular, transaxillary and infraclavicular approaches, each offering specific benefits based on patient anatomy and surgeon expertise. Minimally invasive techniques, such as video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and robotic surgery, enhance exposure and dexterity, leading to better outcomes. Future research should focus on developing precise diagnostic tools, understanding nTOS pathophysiology, standardising diagnostic criteria and surgical approaches, comparing long-term treatment outcomes and exploring preventive measures to improve patient care and quality of life. Level of Evidence: Level V (Therapeutic).

Scapular Elevation Sign - A New Sign in Evaluation of Thoracic Outlet Syndrome.

Background: We noted that patients with thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) have elevation of the ipsilateral scapula and named this the scapular elevation sign (SES). The aim was to determine the prevalence of SES in a normal cohort, compare SES with other provocative tests and to determine the treatment effect on SES. Methods: First, normal asymptomatic subjects were prospectively assessed to determine the prevalence of SES in a normal cohort. Second, patients with TOS were retrospectively examined for the presence of SES and four provocative tests: supraclavicular pressure, scalene test, elevated arm stress test (EAST) and the military brace manoeuvre. All patients were initially treated non-surgically. Surgery was offered to patients with persistent symptoms at 6 months. Patients were re-examined for the presence of the SES after treatment. Results: The prevalence of SES in our normal cohort was 4% (2/53). Our study cohort included 20 patients with TOS. The SES was positive in 18 patients (90%). Supraclavicular pressure was positive in 11 (55%), scalene test in 13 (65%), EAST in 9 (45%) and military brace manoeuvre in 11 patients (55%). Following non-surgical treatment, six patients had symptom resolution, three had improvement, nine persistent symptoms and two were lost to follow-up. The SES was positive in one out of six patients with symptom resolution, two out of three patients with improvement and in all nine patients with persistent symptoms. Patients with persistent symptoms underwent surgery with symptom resolution in eight and improvement in one patient. The SES remained positive in two patients after surgical treatment. Conclusions: The SES is simple and sensitive, does not rely on variations in performance of the test and suitable for diagnosis and assessment of outcomes of TOS. Level of Evidence: Level III (Diagnostic).

Malunion of a clavicle fracture caused thoracic outlet syndrome in a professional violinist.

Clavicle fractures are a common injury in adults. Most patients are treated non-operatively. In this case report, a 53-year-old professional violinist had a midt shaft clavicula fracture and was treated non-operatively. The fracture healed, but the patient developed thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) and a venous thrombosis when playing violin. Surgery with restoration of the normal anatomy alleviated the symptoms and six months later she was symptom free and playing violin again. TOS is a rare complication to clavicle fractures and the treating doctors should be aware of the diagnosis.

Management of thoracic outlet syndrome in patients with hemodialysis access.

Patients with threatened arteriovenous access are often found to have central venous stenoses at the ipsilateral costoclavicular junction, which may be resistant to endovascular intervention. Stenoses in this location may not resolve unless surgical decompression of thoracic outlet is performed to relieve the extrinsic compression on the subclavian vein. The authors reviewed the management of dialysis patients with central venous lesions at the thoracic outlet, as well as the role of surgical decompression with first-rib resection or claviculectomy for salvage of threatened, ipsilateral dialysis access.

Thoracic outlet syndrome in women.

Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is observed more frequently in women, although the exact causes of this sex disparity remain unclear. By investigating the three types of TOS-arterial, neurogenic, and venous-regarding symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment, this article aims to shed light on the current understanding of TOS, focusing on its variations in women.

A review of arterial thoracic outlet syndrome.

Arterial thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a condition in which anatomic abnormalities in the thoracic outlet cause compression of the subclavian or, less commonly, axillary artery. Patients are usually younger and typically have an anatomic abnormality causing the compression. The condition usually goes undiagnosed until patients present with signs of acute or chronic hand or arm ischemia. Workup of this condition includes a thorough history and physical examination; chest x-ray to identify potential anatomic abnormalities; and arterial imaging, such as computed tomographic angiography or duplex to identify arterial abnormalities. Patients will usually require operative intervention, given their symptomatic presentation. Intervention should always include decompression of the thoracic outlet with at least a first-rib resection and any other structures causing external compression. If the artery is identified to have intimal damage, mural thrombus, or is aneurysmal, then arterial reconstruction is warranted. Stenting should be avoided due to external compression. In patients with symptoms of embolization, a combination of embolectomy, lytic catheter placement, and/or therapeutic anticoagulation should be done. Typically, patients have excellent outcomes, with resolution of symptoms and high patency of the bypass graft, although patients with distal embolization may require finger amputation.

Trans-axillary thoracic outlet decompression.

Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a group of conditions thought to be caused by the compression of neurovascular structures going to the upper extremity. TOS is a difficult disease to diagnose, and surgical treatment remains challenging. Many different surgical techniques for the treatment of TOS have been described in the literature and many reasonable to good outcomes have been reported, which makes it hard for surgeons to determine which techniques should be used. Our aim was to describe the rationale, techniques, and outcomes associated with the surgical treatment of TOS. Most patients in our center are treated primarily through a trans-axillary approach. We will elaborate on the technical details of performing trans-axillary thoracic outlet decompression. The essential steps during surgery are illustrated with videos. We focused on the idea behind performing a trans-axillary thoracic outlet decompression in primary cases. Institutional data on the outcomes of this surgical approach are described briefly.

The infraclavicular approach for venous thoracic outlet syndrome.

Venous thoracic outlet syndrome (vTOS) is an esoteric condition that presents in young, healthy adults. Treatment includes catheter-directed thrombolysis, followed by first-rib resection for decompression of the thoracic outlet. Various techniques for first-rib resection have been described with successful outcomes. The infraclavicular approach is well-suited to treat the most medial structures that are anatomically relevant for vTOS. A narrative review was conducted to specifically examine the literature on infraclavicular exposure for vTOS. The technique for this operation is described, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of this approach. The infraclavicular approach is a reasonable choice for definitive treatment of uncomplicated vTOS.

Systematic review of intermediate and long-term results of thoracic outlet decompression.

Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) consists of a group of disorders resulting from compression of the neurovascular bundle exiting through the thoracic outlet. TOS can be classified as follows based on the etiology of the pathophysiology: neurogenic TOS, venous TOS, arterial TOS, and mixed TOS. The constellation of symptoms a patient may experience varies, depending on the structures involved. Due to the wide range of etiologies and presenting symptoms, treatments for TOS also differ. Furthermore, most studies focus on the perioperative and short-term outcomes after surgical decompression for TOS. This systematic review aimed to provide a pooled analysis of studies to better understand the intermediate and long-term outcomes of surgical decompression for TOS. We conducted a systematic literature search in the Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Google Scholar databases for studies that analyzed long-term outcomes after surgical decompression for TOS. The inclusion period was from January 2015 to May 2023. The primary outcome was postoperative QuickDASH Outcome Measure scores. A total of 16 studies were included in the final analysis. The differences between postoperative and preoperative QuickDASH Outcome Measure scores were calculated, when possible, and there was a mean overall difference of 33.5 points (95% CI, 25.2-41.8; P = .001) after surgical decompression. There was a higher proportion of excellent outcomes reported for patients undergoing intervention for arterial and mixed TOS etiologies, whereas those with venous and neurogenic etiologies had the lowest proportion of excellent outcomes reported. Patients with neurogenic TOS had the highest proportion of poor outcomes reported. In conclusion, surgical decompression for TOS has favorable long-term outcomes, especially in patients with arterial and mixed etiologies.

Diagnosis and management of thoracic outlet syndrome in athletes.

The physical demands of sports can place patients at elevated risk of use-related pathologies, including thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS). Overhead athletes in particular (eg, baseball and football players, swimmers, divers, and weightlifters) often subject their subclavian vessels and brachial plexuses to repetitive trauma, resulting in venous effort thrombosis, arterial occlusions, brachial plexopathy, and more. This patient population is at higher risk for Paget-Schroetter syndrome, or effort thrombosis, although neurogenic TOS (nTOS) is still the predominant form of the disease among all groups. First-rib resection is almost always recommended for vascular TOS in a young, active population, although a surgical benefit for patients with nTOS is less clear. Practitioners specializing in upper extremity disorders should take care to differentiate TOS from other repetitive use-related disorders, including shoulder orthopedic injuries and nerve entrapments at other areas of the neck and arm, as TOS is usually a diagnosis of exclusion. For nTOS, physical therapy is a cornerstone of diagnosis, along with response to injections. Most patients first undergo some period of nonoperative management with intense physical therapy and training before proceeding with rib resection. It is particularly essential for ensuring that athletes can return to their baselines of flexibility, strength, and stamina in the upper extremity. Botulinum toxin and lidocaine injections in the anterior scalene muscle might predict which patients will likely benefit from first-rib resection. Athletes are usually satisfied with their decisions to undergo first-rib resection, although the risk of rare but potentially career- or life-threatening complications, such as brachial plexus injury or subclavian vessel injury, must be considered. Frequently, they are able to return to the same or a higher level of play after full recovery.

Neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome and controversies in diagnosis and management.

Compression of the neurovascular structures at the level of the scalene triangle and pectoralis minor space is rare, but increasing awareness and understanding is allowing for the treatment of more individuals than in the past. We outlined the recognition, preoperative evaluation, and treatment of patients with neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome. Recent work has illustrated the role of imaging and centrality of the physical examination on the diagnosis. However, a fuller understanding of the spatial biomechanics of the shoulder, scalene triangle, and pectoralis minor musculotendinous complex has shown that, although physical therapy is a mainstay of treatment, a poor response to physical therapy with a sound diagnosis should not preclude decompression. Modes of failure of surgical decompression stress the importance of full resection of the anterior scalene muscle and all posterior rib impinging elements to minimize the risk of recurrence of symptoms. Neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome is a rare but critical cause of disability of the upper extremity. Modern understanding of the pathophysiology and evaluation have led to a sounder diagnosis. Although physical therapy is a mainstay, surgical decompression remains the gold standard to preserve and recover function of the upper extremity. Understanding these principles will be central to further developments in the treatment of this patient population.

Current concepts in clinical features and diagnosis of thoracic outlet syndrome.

The diagnosis and clinical features of thoracic outlet syndrome have long confounded clinicians, owing to heterogeneity in symptom presentation and many overlapping competing diagnoses that are "more common." Despite the advent and prevalence of high-resolution imaging, along with the increasing awareness of the syndrome itself, misdiagnoses and untimely diagnoses can result in significant patient morbidity. The authors aimed to summarize the current concepts in the clinical features and diagnosis of thoracic outlet syndrome.

State of the art review. Upper extremity revision nerve compression surgery.

Although surgical release of upper extremity nerve compression syndromes is highly effective, persistence or recurrence of symptoms and signs may occur. Thorough investigation is necessary in this situation before treatment is recommended. If the symptoms cannot be explained by other pathology than compression of the affected nerve and if conservative management has not provided improvement, reoperation may be considered. This review provides an overview of the diagnostic and surgical considerations in the revision of carpal tunnel syndrome, cubital tunnel syndrome and thoracic outlet syndrome.Level of evidence: V.

Evaluating the effects of mobile application-based rehabilitation on improving disability and pain in patients with disputed thoracic outlet syndrome: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Disputed thoracic outlet syndrome (D.TOS) stands as one of the primary global contributors to physical disability, presenting diagnostic and treatment challenges for patients and frequently resulting in prolonged periods of pain and functional impairment. Mobile applications emerge as a promising avenue in aiding patient self-management and rehabilitation for D.TOS. This study aimed to investigate the impact of a certain mobile application-based rehabilitation on pain relief and the improvement of disability in patients experiencing D.TOS. METHODS: Eighty-eight patients diagnosed with D.TOS randomized 1:1 to either the control group (n = 44) or the intervention group (n = 44). Participants in the control group were provided with a brochure containing standard rehabilitation exercise instructions, a written drug prescription from the physician, and guidance on recommended physical activity levels, including home exercises. In contrast, all participants in the intervention group used the mobile application. Disability and pain levels in patients were assessed after six weeks in both groups. RESULT: Both groups improved pain and disability based on the scaled measurements. According to the questionnaire scale, the intervention group showed a considerable decline in disability; however, there was a significant difference in just one question (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the intervention group showed significant improvement in neck pain NRS (p = 0.024) compared to the control. Based on the shoulder and head pain numeric rate scale (NRSs), both groups showed improvement in disability conditions; but there were no significant differences between the groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Mobile applications are promising tools for alleviating disabilities and pain in patients with musculoskeletal conditions. This study confirmed the potential of mobile technology to enhance active and corrective physical activity, thereby reducing pain in patients with D.TOS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT) with the identifier IRCT20141221020380N3 (http://www.irct.ir/).