A Novel Technique for Temporally Securing a Chest Tube in a Resource-Limited Environment.

In the prehospital, transport, and resource-limited setting, patients with traumatic hemothorax, pneumothorax, or cardiac arrest require emergency tube thoracostomy for stabilization and transport. With the possibility of multiple patients, limited providers, and inability to commit a 1:1 provider-to-patient ratio for safe tubeless thoracostomies, a chest tube is often the safest option. Mercy Health Life Flight Air Medical program has developed practice over decades using towel clamps and tape to achieve securement rapidly and reliably. We report on this subject as an option for temporarily securing a chest tube in the disaster, resource-poor, prehospital, or critical care transport setting.

Thoracic Ultrasound for Detection of Pneumothorax Following Thoracostomy Tube Removal in Trauma Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Screening for pneumothorax (PTX) is standard practice after thoracostomy tube removal, with postpull CXR being the gold standard. However, studies have shown that point-of-care thoracic ultrasound (POCTUS) is effective at detecting PTX and may represent a viable alternative. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of POCTUS for evaluation of clinically significant postpull PTX compared with chest x-ray (CXR). METHODS: We performed a prospective, cohort study at a Level 1 trauma center between April and December 2022 comparing the ability of POCTUS to detect clinically significant postpull PTX compared with CXR. Patients with thoracostomy tube placed for PTX, hemothorax, or hemopneumothorax were included. Clinically insignificant PTX was defined as a small residual or apical PTX without associated respiratory symptoms or need for thoracostomy tube replacement while clinically significant PTX were moderate to large or associated with physiologic change. RESULTS: We included 82 patients, the most common etiology was blunt trauma (n = 57), and the indications for thoracostomy tube placement were: PTX (n = 38), hemothorax (n = 15), and hemopneumothorax (n = 14). One patient required thoracostomy tube replacement for recurrent PTX identified by both ultrasound and X-ray. Thoracic ultrasound had a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 95%, positive predictive value of 60%, and negative predictive value of 100% for the detection of clinically significant postpull PTX. CONCLUSIONS: The use of POCTUS for the detection of clinically significant PTX after thoracostomy tube removal is a safe and effective alternative to standard CXR. This echoes similar studies and emphasizes the need for further investigation in a multicenter study.

Retreatment after primary spontaneous pneumothoraxes managed with primary tube thoracostomy or surgery.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There is a paucity of data on later healthcare visits and retreatments after primary treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax. The main purpose of this study was to describe retreatment rates up to 5 years after primary spontaneous pneumothorax treated with either surgery or tube thoracostomy (TT) at index hospitalization in Finland between 2005 and 2018 to estimate the burden of primary spontaneous pneumothorax on the healthcare system. METHODS: Retrospective registry-based study of patients with primary spontaneous pneumothorax treated with TT or surgery in Finland in 2005-2018. Rehospitalization and retreatment for recurrent pneumothorax and complications attributable to initial treatment were identified. RESULTS: The total study population was 1594 patients. At 5 years, 53.2% (384/722) of TT treated and 33.8% (295/872) of surgically treated patients had undergone any retreatment. Surgery was associated with a lower risk of recurrence than TT (hazard ratio (HR) 0.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.43-0.56, p < 0.001). Male sex was associated with a lower risk of recurrent treatment (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.63-0.90, p = 0.001). Higher age decreased the risk of recurrent treatment (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.99-0.99, p < 0.001). At 5 years, 36.0% (260/722) of the TT treated and 18.8% (164/872) of the surgically treated had undergone reoperation at some point. CONCLUSIONS: Reintervention rates and repeat hospital visits after TT and surgery were surprisingly high at long-term follow-up. Occurrences of retreatment and reoperation were significantly higher among primary spontaneous pneumothorax patients treated with TT at index hospitalization than among patients treated with surgery.

Chest Tube Size Selection: Evaluating Provider Practices, Treatment Efficacy, and Complications in Management of Thoracic Trauma.

BACKGROUND: The standard for managing traumatic pneumothorax (PTX), hemothorax (HTX), and hemopneumothorax (HPTX) has historically been large-bore (LB) chest tubes (>20-Fr). Previous studies have shown equal efficacy of small-bore (SB) chest tubes (≤19-Fr) in draining PTX and HTX/HPTX. This study aimed to evaluate provider practice patterns, treatment efficacy, and complications related to the selection of chest tube sizes for patients with thoracic trauma. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on adult patients who underwent tube thoracostomy for traumatic PTX, HTX, or HPTX at a Level 1 Trauma Center from January 2016 to December 2021. Comparison was made between SB and LB thoracostomy tubes. The primary outcome was indication for chest tube placement based on injury pattern. Secondary outcomes included retained hemothorax, insertion-related complications, and duration of chest tube placement. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: Three hundred and forty-one patients were included and 297 (87.1%) received LB tubes. No significant differences were found between the groups concerning tube failure and insertion-related complications. LB tubes were more frequently placed in patients with penetrating MOI, higher average ISS, and higher average thoracic AIS. Patients who received LB chest tubes experienced a higher incidence of retained HTX. DISCUSSION: In patients with thoracic trauma, both SB and LB chest tubes may be used for treatment. SB tubes are typically placed in nonemergent situations, and there is apparent provider bias for LB tubes. A future randomized clinical trial is needed to provide additional data on the usage of SB tubes in emergent situations.

Using chest X-ray to predict tube thoracostomy in traumatic pneumothorax: A single-institution retrospective review.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic pneumothorax (PTX) is a common occurrence in thoracic trauma patients, with a majority requiring tube thoracostomy (TT) for management. Recently, the "35-mm" rule has advocated for observation of patients with PTX less than 35 mm on chest computed tomography (CT) scan. This rule has not been examined in chest x-ray (CXR). We hypothesize that a similar size cutoff can be determined in CXR predictive of need for tube thoracostomy. METHODS: We performed a single-institution retrospective review of patients with traumatic PTX from 2018 to 2022, excluding those who underwent TT prior to CXR. Primary outcomes were size of pneumothorax on CXR and need for TT; secondary outcome was failed observation, defined as TT more than 4 hours after presentation. To determine the size cutoff on CXR to predict TT need, area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) analyses were performed and Youden's index calculated (significance at p < 0.05). Predictors of failure were calculated using logistic regression. RESULTS: There were 341 pneumothoraces in 304 patients (94.4% blunt trauma, median injury severity score 14). Of these, 82 (24.0%) had a TT placed within the first 4 hours. Fifty-five of observed patients (21.2%) failed, and these patients had a larger PTX on CXR (8.6 mm [5.0-18.0 mm] vs. 0.0 mm [0.0-2.3 mm] ( p < 0.001)). Chest x-ray PTX size correlated moderately with CT size (r = 0.31, p < 0.001) and was highly predictive of need for TT insertion (AUC 0.75, p < 0.0001), with an optimal size cutoff predicting TT need of 38 mm. CONCLUSION: Chest x-ray imaging size was predictive of need for TT, with an optimal size cutoff on CXR of 38 mm, approaching the "35-mm rule." In addition to size, failed observation was predicted by presenting lactic acidosis and need for supplemental oxygen. This demonstrates this cutoff should be considered for prospective study in CXR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.

Not so FAST-Chest ultrasound underdiagnoses traumatic pneumothorax.

BACKGROUND: Ultrasonography for trauma is a widely used tool in the initial evaluation of trauma patients with complete ultrasonography of trauma (CUST) demonstrating equivalence to computed tomography (CT) for detecting clinically significant abdominal hemorrhage. Initial reports demonstrated high sensitivity of CUST for the bedside diagnosis of pneumothorax. We hypothesized that the sensitivity of CUST would be greater than initial supine chest radiograph (CXR) for detecting pneumothorax. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with pneumothorax from 2018 through 2020 at a Level I trauma center was performed. Patients included had routine supine CXR and CUST performed prior to intervention as well as confirmatory CT imaging. All CUST were performed during the initial evaluation in the trauma bay by a registered sonographer. All imaging was evaluated by an attending radiologist. Subgroup analysis was performed after excluding occult pneumothorax. Immediate tube thoracostomy was defined as tube placement with confirmatory CXR within 8 hours of admission. RESULTS: There were 568 patients screened with a diagnosis of pneumothorax, identifying 362 patients with a confirmed pneumothorax in addition to CXR, CUST, and confirmatory CT imaging. The population was 83% male, had a mean age of 45 years, with 85% presenting due to blunt trauma. Sensitivity of CXR for detecting pneumothorax was 43%, while the sensitivity of CUST was 35%. After removal of occult pneumothorax (n = 171), CXR was 78% sensitive, while CUST was 65% sensitive (p < 0.01). In this subgroup, CUST had a false-negative rate of 36% (n = 62). Of those patients with a false-negative CUST, 50% (n = 31) underwent tube thoracostomy, with 85% requiring immediate placement. CONCLUSION: Complete ultrasonography of trauma performed on initial trauma evaluation had lower sensitivity than CXR for identification of pneumothorax including clinically significant pneumothorax requiring tube thoracostomy. Using CUST as the primary imaging modality in the initial evaluation of chest trauma should be considered with caution. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Test study, Level IV.

Evaluation and management of traumatic pneumothorax: A Western Trauma Association critical decisions algorithm.

ABSTRACT: This is a recommended algorithm of the Western Trauma Association for the management of a traumatic pneumothorax. The current algorithm and recommendations are based on available published prospective cohort, observational, and retrospective studies and the expert opinion of the Western Trauma Association members. The algorithm and accompanying text represents a safe and reasonable approach to this common problem. We recognize that there may be variability in decision making, local resources, institutional consensus, and patient-specific factors that may require deviation from the algorithm presented. This annotated algorithm is meant to serve as a basis from which protocols at individual institutions can be developed or serve as a quick bedside reference for clinicians. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Consensus algorithm from the Western Trauma Association, Level V.

Beyond the tube: Can we reduce chest tube complications in trauma patients?

BACKGROUND: We sought to identify opportunities for interventions to mitigate complications of tube thoracostomy (TT). METHODS: Retrospective review of all trauma patients undergoing TT from 6/30/2016-6/30/2019. Multivariable logistic regression identified independent predictors of complications. RESULTS: Out of 451 patients, 171 (37.9%) had at least one TT malpositioning or complication. Placement in the emergency department, placement by emergency medicine physicians, and body mass index >30 kg/m2 were independent predictors of complication. Malpositioning increased the likelihood of early complication (6.5%-53.5%), and early complication increased the likelihood of late complication (4.3%-13.6%). Patients with a late complication had, on average, a 7.56 day longer hospital stay than patients without a late complication. CONCLUSION: TT complications were associated with placement in the emergency department, placement by emergency medicine physicians, and BMI>30 kg/m2. We identified associations between malpositioning, early complications, and late complications, and demonstrated that TT complications impact patient outcomes.

Development and evolution of a robotic surgical technique for the treatment of thoracic outlet syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: We describe the development and evolution of a surgical technique that uses the robotic da Vinci Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical, Inc, Sunnyvale, Calif) for the transaxillary approach to repair the disabling thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS). We report our patient outcomes associated with the use of this robotic technique. METHODS: We present a retrospective review and analysis of data collected from a 16-year experience of a single surgeon using a robotic surgical system and technique for TOS surgery. From the initial design of an endoscope attached to a microvideo camera in 1982 to the adoption of the monorobotic arm with integrated voice in 1998, the main objective of the transaxillary approach has always been to improve visualization of congenital cervical anomalies of the scalene muscles. From February 2003 to December 2018, we performed 412 transaxillary decompression procedures using the robotic da Vinci Surgical System. The surgical procedure has been described in further detail and includes the following steps: (1) positioning of the patient into a lateral decubitus position and using a monoarm retractor; (2) creation of a mini-incision in the axillary area and creation and maintenance of the subpectoral anatomic working space; (3) placement of endoscopic ports and engagement of the robotic instrumentation; (4) dissection of extrapleural and intrapleural soft tissue; (5) creation of the "floater" first rib; (6) excision of the cervical bands and first rib; and (7) placement of thoracostomy tubes for drainage and closure of the incisions. RESULTS: None of the patients died, and no patient experienced permanent neurovascular damage of the extremity. Of the 306 patients, 22 (5% of 441 operations) experienced complications. One patient developed postoperative scarring that required a redo operation with a robotic-assisted transaxillary approach. CONCLUSIONS: With its three-dimensional visual magnification of the anatomic area, the endoscopic robotic-assisted transaxillary approach offers safe and effective management of disabling TOS symptoms. The endoscope facilitates observation of the cervical bands and the mechanism (pathogenesis) of the neurovascular compression that causes TOS, thereby allowing complete excision of the first rib, cervical bands, and scalene muscle. We sought to develop and perfect this robotic approach. The present study was not intended to be a comparative study to nonrobotic TOS surgery.

Cryptococcal empyema treated with tube thoracostomy and intrapleural fibrinolysis.

A 55-year old woman with a history of relapsed T-cell ALL presented with right pleuritic chest pain and decreased breath sounds over the right hemithorax. Imaging of the chest showed loculated effusions. Tube thoracostomy was performed with intrapleural application of alteplase and dornase alpha over a 3-day period. Repeat imaging demonstrated a marked decrease in the volume of the effusion. In most prior published cases of pleural cryptococcosis, surgical drainage was required in addition to prolonged antifungal agents. More than 50% of patients with cryptococcal infection have severe underlying disease or immunodeficiency state making them high risk for surgery. This is the first case to our knowledge of cryptococcal empyema successfully treated with tube thoracostomy and intrapleural fibrinolysis.

Effectiveness and safety of small-bore tube thoracostomy (≤20 Fr) for chest trauma patients: A retrospective observational study.

INTRODUCTION: Tube thoracostomy is an important treatment for traumatic hemothorax and pneumothorax. The optimal tube diameter remains unclear. To reduce invasiveness, we use small-bore chest tubes (≤20 Fr) for all trauma patients for whom tube thoracostomy is indicated in our emergency department (ED). The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness and safety of small-bore tube thoracostomy for traumatic hemothorax or pneumothorax. METHOD: We conducted a retrospective observational study at a single emergency medical center. This study included adult patients (≥18 years old) who had undergone tube thoracostomy for chest trauma in the ED during the 5 years from October 2013 to September 2018. We used 20 Fr chest tubes or 8 Fr pigtail catheters. The examined outcome was tube-related complications, such as tube obstruction, retained hemothorax, and unresolved pneumothorax. RESULTS: A total of 107 tube thoracostomies were performed in 102 patients. The mean Injury Severity Score of these patients was 17.8 (±9.6), and the mean duration of the tube placement period was 3.9 days (±1.8). Eight patients developed tube-related complications (7.8%) (retained hemothorax: 4 patients (3.9%), unresolved pneumothorax: 4 patients (3.9%)). None of these cases were caused by tube obstruction. Although the drainage itself was effective, they underwent definitive invasive interventions to stop bleeding or air leak. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that the use of small-bore (≤20 Fr) chest tubes to treat traumatic hemothorax/pneumothorax achieved the purposes of tube thoracostomy. It might be possible to safely manage chest trauma with small-bore chest tubes.

Thoracoacromial artery injury after tube thoracostomy for pneumothorax.

In this case, a patient presented in a delayed fashion after blunt trauma is found to have a large left-sided pneumothorax, and tube thoracostomy is performed. After placement of the apically oriented tube, he developed haemothorax. CT imaging showed an area of questionable extravasation from the left subclavian artery, directly anterior to the thoracostomy tube. His haemothorax was refractory to adequate drainage with a new thoracostomy tube. He ultimately required angiography, coil embolisation and covered stent placement, followed by thoracoscopic evacuation of the haemothorax.

Too Big, Too Small or Just Right? Why the 28 French Chest Tube Is the Best Size.

BACKGROUND: Tube thoracostomy is a commonly performed procedure in trauma patients. The optimal chest tube size is unknown. This study measures chest tube drainage in a controlled laboratory setting and compares measured flowrates to those predicted by the Hagen-Poiseuille equation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A model of massive hemothorax was created, consisting of a basin containing synthetic blood substitute (aqueous Glycerin and Xanthan gum) and a standard pleur-evac setup at -20 cm H2O suction. Flow measurements were calculated by measuring the time to drain 2L of blood substitute from the basin. Chest tube sizes tested were 20F, 24F, 28F, 32F, and 36F. Thoracostomy opening was modeled using custom built device that represents two ribs, with the distance between varied 2 to 12 mm. Flowrate increases were compared against predicted increases according to the Hagen-Poiseuille equation. Percent of predicted increase was calculated, both incremental increase and using 20F tube benchmark. RESULTS: All tubes were occluded at a 2 mm thoracostomy opening. At 3 mm, 32F and 36F were occluded while smaller tubes were patent. Tubes 28F and larger exhibited high speed and consistent flowrates, even after decreasing thoracostomy opening down to 7 mm, while flowrates rapidly decreased at opening smaller than 7 mm. Smaller 24F and 20F tubes exhibited highly variable flowrates through the system. Maximum flowrates were 21.7, 36.8, 49.6, 55.6, and 61.0 mL/s for 20F-36F tubes, respectively. The incremental increase in flow ratio for increasing chest tube size was 1.69 (20F to 24F), 1.35 (24F to 28F), 1.12 (28F to 32F), and 1.10 (32F to 36F). CONCLUSIONS: The 28F chest tube exhibited high and consistent velocity, while smaller tubes were slower and more variable. Larger tubes offered only slightly higher flowrates. The 28F is a good balance of reasonable size and high flowrate and is likely the optimal size for most clinical applications.

Comparison of 10- versus 14-gauge angiocatheter for treatment of tension pneumothorax and tension-induced pulseless electrical activity with hemorrhagic shock: Bigger is still better.

BACKGROUND: Little is known regarding the effect of hemorrhagic shock on the diagnosis and treatment of tension pneumothorax (tPTX). Recently, the Tactical Combat Casualty Care guidelines included the 10-gauge angiocatheter (10-g AC) as an acceptable alternative to the 14-g AC. This study sought to compare these two devices for decompression of tPTX and rescue from tension-induced pulseless electric activity (tPEA) in the setting of a concomitant 30% estimated blood volume hemorrhage. METHODS: Following a controlled hemorrhage, carbon dioxide was insufflated into the chest to induce either tPTX or tPEA. Tension pneumothorax was defined as a reduction in cardiac output by 50%, and tPEA was defined as a loss of arterial waveform with mean arterial pressure less than 20 mm Hg. The affected hemithorax was decompressed using a randomized 14-g AC or 10-g AC while a persistent air leak was maintained after decompression. Successful rescue from tPTX was defined as 80% recovery of baseline systolic blood pressure, while successful return of spontaneous circulation following tPEA was defined as a mean arterial pressure greater than 20 mm Hg. Primary outcome was success of device. RESULTS: Eighty tPTX and 50 tPEA events were conducted in 38 adult Yorkshire swine. There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics between animals or devices. In the tPTX model, the 10-g AC successfully rescued 90% of events, while 14-g AC rescued 80% of events (p = 0.350). In the tPEA model, the 10-g AC rescued 87% of events while the 14 AC rescued only 48% of events (p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: The 10-g AC was vastly superior to the 14-g AC for return of spontaneous circulation following tPEA in the setting of 30% hemorrhage. These findings further support the importance of larger caliber devices that facilitate rapid recovery from tPTX, particularly in the setting of polytrauma. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, level II.

How emergency physicians choose chest tube size for traumatic pneumothorax or hemothorax: a comparison between 28Fr and smaller tube.

Most traumatic pneumothoraxes and hemothoraxes can be managed non-operatively by means of chest tube thoracostomy. This study aimed to investigate how emergency physicians choose chest tube size and whether chest tube size affects patient outcome. We reviewed medical charts of patients who underwent chest tube insertion for chest trauma within 24 hours of admission in this retrospective, single-institution study. Patient characteristics, inserted tube size, risk of additional tube, and complications were evaluated. Eighty-six chest tubes were placed in 64 patients. Sixty-seven tubes were placed initially, and 19 additionally, which was significantly smaller than the initial tube. Initial tube size was 28 Fr in 38 and <28 Fr in 28 patients. Indications were pneumothorax (n=24), hemothorax (n=7), and hemopneumothorax (n=36). Initial tube size was not related to sex, BMI, BSA, indication, ISS, RTS, chest AIS, or respiratory status. An additional tube was placed in the same thoracic cavity for residual pneumothorax (n=13), hemothorax (n=1), hemopneumothorax (n=1), and inappropriate extrapleural placement (n=3). Risk of additional tube placement was not significantly different depending on tube size. No additional tube was placed for tube occlusion or surgical intervention for residual clotted hemothorax. Emergency physicians did not choose tube size depending on patient sex, body size, or situation. Even with a <28 Fr tube placed in chest trauma patients, the risk of residual hemo/pneumothorax and tube occlusion did not increase, and drainage was effective.

The Evolution of Surgical Management for Children and Young Adults With Spontaneous Pneumothorax.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have analyzed pediatric spontaneous pneumothorax (SPTX) nationally. We sought to better define this patient population and explore the evolution of surgical management. METHODS: Patients (10-20 y old) with an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision diagnosis of SPTX were identified within the Kids' Inpatient Database for the years 2006, 2009, and 2012. Diagnoses and procedures were analyzed by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes. National estimates were obtained using case weighting. RESULTS: There were 11,792 pediatric SPTX hospitalizations, and patients were predominantly male (84.0%), non-Hispanic white (69.0%), with a mean age of 17.2 y (95% confidence interval, 17.2-17.3). Overall, 52.5% underwent tube thoracostomy as the primary intervention, and more than one-third had a major surgical procedure (34.9%). From 2006 to 2012, there was an increase in bleb excisions from 81.1% to 86.9% and an increase in mechanical pleurodesis from 64.2% to 69.0%. There was a significant change from a predominantly open thoracotomy approach in 2006 (76.1%) to a video-assisted thoracoscopic approach in 2012 (89.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric admission for SPTX results in tube thoracostomy in more than half of the cases and surgery in approximately one-third of the cases. Surgical intervention has changed to a more minimally invasive approach during the last decade, and counseling to patients and their families should reflect these updated management strategies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Clamping trials prior to thoracostomy tube removal and the need for subsequent invasive pleural drainage.

BACKGROUND: There is little evidence supporting or refuting clamping trials, a period of clamping thoracostomy tubes prior to removal. We sought to evaluate whether clamping trials reduce the need for subsequent pleural drainage procedures. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of trauma patients who underwent tube thoracostomy during 2009-2015. We compared patients who underwent clamping trials to those who did not, adjusting for confounders. The primary outcome was subsequent ipsilateral pleural drainage within 30 days. RESULTS: We evaluated 214 clamping trial and 285 control patients. Only two of 214 patients failed their clamping trial and none developed a tension pneumothorax [0.0% (95% CI 0.0-1.7%)]. Clamping trials were associated with fewer pleural drainage procedures [13 (6%) vs. 33 (12%); adjusted OR 0.41 (95% CI 0.20-0.84)]. CONCLUSIONS: A clamping trial prior to thoracostomy tube removal seems to be safe and was associated with less likelihood of a subsequent pleural drainage procedure.