Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 2.803
Filter
1.
Intern Med ; 63(13): 1917-1922, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38945933

ABSTRACT

Thrombocytopenia, anasarca, fever, renal dysfunction, and organomegaly (TAFRO) syndrome is an inflammatory disorder with an unclear pathogenesis. We herein report a case of TAFRO syndrome in remission in a patient who experienced recurrent intracranial bleeding despite a normal platelet count and coagulation system. A further investigation suggested the presence of anti-glycoprotein VI (GPVI) autoantibodies in the plasma, which induced platelet dysfunction and bleeding tendency. No new bleeding or relapse of TAFRO syndrome occurred after immunosuppressive therapy was initiated. These findings may help elucidate the autoimmune pathogenesis of TAFRO syndrome.


Subject(s)
Autoantibodies , Recurrence , Humans , Autoantibodies/blood , Autoantibodies/immunology , Syndrome , Platelet Membrane Glycoproteins/immunology , Cerebral Hemorrhage/immunology , Cerebral Hemorrhage/etiology , Cerebral Hemorrhage/blood , Thrombocytopenia/immunology , Thrombocytopenia/blood , Fever/immunology , Fever/etiology , Female , Middle Aged , Male , Blood Platelet Disorders/immunology , Blood Platelet Disorders/complications , Blood Platelet Disorders/blood
2.
Clin Immunol ; 264: 110252, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38744408

ABSTRACT

Children with Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C) can present with thrombocytopenia, which is a key feature of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH). We hypothesized that thrombocytopenic MIS-C patients have more features of HLH. Clinical characteristics and routine laboratory parameters were collected from 228 MIS-C patients, of whom 85 (37%) were thrombocytopenic. Thrombocytopenic patients had increased ferritin levels; reduced leukocyte subsets; and elevated levels of ASAT and ALAT. Soluble IL-2RA was higher in thrombocytopenic children than in non-thrombocytopenic children. T-cell activation, TNF-alpha and IFN-gamma signaling markers were inversely correlated with thrombocyte levels, consistent with a more pronounced cytokine storm syndrome. Thrombocytopenia was not associated with severity of MIS-C and no pathogenic variants were identified in HLH-related genes. This suggests that thrombocytopenia in MIS-C is not a feature of a more severe disease phenotype, but the consequence of a distinct hyperinflammatory immunopathological process in a subset of children.


Subject(s)
Lymphohistiocytosis, Hemophagocytic , Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome , Thrombocytopenia , Humans , Lymphohistiocytosis, Hemophagocytic/blood , Lymphohistiocytosis, Hemophagocytic/immunology , Lymphohistiocytosis, Hemophagocytic/genetics , Child , Male , Child, Preschool , Female , Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome/blood , Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome/immunology , Thrombocytopenia/blood , Thrombocytopenia/immunology , Infant , Adolescent , Phenotype , Proteomics , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19/blood , COVID-19/complications
3.
J Pak Med Assoc ; 74(5): 911-916, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38783439

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the extent of cytopenias and systemic immune inflammation index of hospitalised coronavirus disease-2019 patients during the first and second/third waves of the pandemic. Methods: The retrospective, cross-sectional study was conducted in October 2021 at Fatima Memorial Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan, and comprised data of hospitalised coronavirus disease-2019 patients regardless of age and gender from May 2020 to June 2021. Data was segregated into first wave that lasted from May to July 2020, second wave that lasted from early November to mid-December 2020, and third wave that ranged from mid-March to June 2021. For comparison purposes, the data of first wave was in group A, while data of second and third waves was pooled into group B. Age, gender, comorbidities, requirement of ventilator support and outcome of the patients was noted. Inflammatory markers were compared on the basis of complete blood count and systemic immune-inflammation index data. Data was analysed using SPSS 25. RESULTS: Of the 202 patients, 90(44.5%) were in group A and 112(55.4%) were in group B. There were 108(53.5%) males and 94(46.5%) females. The median age in males was 58 years (interquartile range: 21 years) and it was 56 years (interquartile range: 21 years) in females. Neutrophilia (p<0.001), leukocytosis (p<0.001) and lymphocytopenia (p<0.001) had direct association with increased systemic immune-inflammation. Raised systemic immune-inflammation also had an association with increased requirement of ventilator support (p=0.2) and increased mortality (p=0.001). There were more females, more critical patients, more patients with anaemia, leukopenia, lymphocytopenia and thrombocytopenia in group B compared to group A (p<0.05). Need for ventilator support and mortality were also higher in group B compared to group A (p<0.05). Conclusion: All the indicators analysed were worse during the second and third waves of coronavirus disease-2019 compared to the first wave of the pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Thrombocytopenia , Humans , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19/therapy , COVID-19/epidemiology , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Pakistan/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Adult , Aged , Thrombocytopenia/epidemiology , Thrombocytopenia/immunology , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Leukopenia/epidemiology , Lymphopenia/immunology , Respiration, Artificial/statistics & numerical data , Inflammation/immunology , Cytopenia
5.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 9705, 2024 04 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38678158

ABSTRACT

The primary triggers that stimulate the body to generate platelet antibodies via immune mechanisms encompass events such as pregnancy, transplantation, and blood transfusion. Interestingly, our findings revealed that a subset of male patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), despite having no history of transplantation or blood transfusion, has shown positive results in platelet antibody screenings. This hints at the possibility that certain factors, potentially related to the tumor itself or its treatment, may affect antibody production. To delve the causes we initiated this study. We employed a case-control study approach to analyze potential influential factors leading to the positive results via univariate and multivariate regression analysis. We utilized Kendall's tau-b correlation to examine the relationship between the strength of platelet antibodies and peripheral blood cytopenia. Antitumor medication emerged as an independent risk factor for positive results in HCC patients, and the strength of platelet antibodies positively correlated with the severity of anemia and thrombocytopenia. Without history of blood transfusion, transplantation, pregnancy, those HCC patients underwent recent tumor medication therapy are experiencing peripheral erythrocytopenia or thrombocytopenia, for them platelet antibody screenings holds potential clinical value for prevention and treatment of complications like drug-immune-related anemia and/or bleeding.


Subject(s)
Blood Platelets , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular , Liver Neoplasms , Humans , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/blood , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/immunology , Liver Neoplasms/blood , Liver Neoplasms/immunology , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Blood Platelets/immunology , Case-Control Studies , Thrombocytopenia/blood , Thrombocytopenia/immunology , Thrombocytopenia/etiology , Aged , Adult , Autoantibodies/blood , Autoantibodies/immunology , Anemia/blood , Anemia/immunology , Risk Factors , Cytopenia
6.
Expert Opin Pharmacother ; 25(3): 281-294, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38465524

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Fcγ-receptors (FcγR) are membrane receptors expressed on a variety of immune cells, specialized in recognition of the Fc part of immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies. FcγRIIA-dependent platelet activation in platelet factor 4 (PF4) antibody-related disorders have gained major attention, when these antibodies were identified as the cause of the adverse vaccination event termed vaccine-induced immune thrombocytopenia and thrombosis (VITT) during the COVID-19 vaccination campaign. With the recognition of anti-PF4 antibodies as cause for severe spontaneous and sometimes recurrent thromboses independent of vaccination, their clinical relevance extended far beyond heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and VITT. AREAS COVERED: Patients developing these disorders show life-threatening thromboses, and the outcome is highly dependent on effective treatment. This narrative literature review summarizes treatment options for HIT and VITT that are currently available for clinical application and provides the perspective toward new developments. EXPERT OPINION: Nearly all these novel approaches are based on in vitro, preclinical observations, or case reports with only limited implementation in clinical practice. The therapeutic potential of these approaches still needs to be proven in larger cohort studies to ensure treatment efficacy and long-term patient safety.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , Heparin , Receptors, IgG , Thrombocytopenia , Thrombosis , Humans , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , Heparin/adverse effects , Platelet Activation/drug effects , Platelet Factor 4/immunology , Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic/chemically induced , Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic/immunology , Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic/drug therapy , Receptors, IgG/metabolism , Receptors, IgG/immunology , Thrombocytopenia/chemically induced , Thrombocytopenia/immunology , Thromboinflammation/drug therapy , Thrombosis/drug therapy , Thrombosis/immunology
7.
J Thromb Haemost ; 22(6): 1772-1778, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38301999

ABSTRACT

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is rare, affecting fewer than 1 in 1500 hospital admissions. Despite the increasing adoption of new therapies in HIT, such as direct oral anticoagulants and pooled immunoglobulins, there is limited high-quality evidence to guide clinicians. Numerous uncommon presentations of HIT and HIT-like entities have recently been recognized, and a harmonized approach to their classification is required to study them better. We present the results of an international survey of opinions from experts and practitioners in the field of platelet immunology regarding the role of direct oral anticoagulants in HIT, novel definitions of subclassifications of HIT-like platelet factor 4 immune conditions (spontaneous autoimmune HIT, persistent autoimmune HIT, and treatment-refractory HIT), and the role for intravenous immunoglobulins in the treatment paradigm of HIT and these HIT-like conditions. From 102 survey responses, there was broad acceptance of rivaroxaban (74.5%) and apixaban (73.5%) even before platelet recovery, as well as for intravenous immunoglobulin in the management of spontaneous (85.6%), persistent (83.7%), and treatment-refractory HIT (87.4%). With this mandate for harmonizing terminologies and treatment approaches in special situations without robust clinical data owing to their rarity, we plan to conduct a robust survey, establish international consensus, and draft management guidelines for HIT and platelet factor 4 immune diseases in the near future.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants , Heparin , Immunoglobulins, Intravenous , Platelet Factor 4 , Thrombocytopenia , Humans , Heparin/adverse effects , Heparin/immunology , Immunoglobulins, Intravenous/therapeutic use , Immunoglobulins, Intravenous/adverse effects , Thrombocytopenia/chemically induced , Thrombocytopenia/immunology , Thrombocytopenia/diagnosis , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Platelet Factor 4/immunology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Pyrazoles/adverse effects , Pyrazoles/therapeutic use , Blood Platelets/immunology , Blood Platelets/drug effects , Blood Platelets/metabolism , Pyridones/adverse effects , Pyridones/therapeutic use , Rivaroxaban/adverse effects , Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic/chemically induced , Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic/immunology , Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic/diagnosis , Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic/blood , Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic/drug therapy , Health Care Surveys , Terminology as Topic
8.
Lab Med ; 55(4): 517-519, 2024 Jul 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38346103

ABSTRACT

RhD alloimmunization from platelet transfusions have been documented in the literature. However, non-RhD platelet alloimmunization is much less frequent and the risk for non-RhD alloimmunization from platelets is thought to be extremely low and most associated with buffy coat pooled platelets. A 22-month-old male with acute myeloid leukemia received 99 mL apheresis platelets for thrombocytopenia. Three months later, an antibody screen, the direct antiglobulin test (DAT), and red blood cell (RBC) genotype were sent for laboratory evaluation. The antibody screen was positive, with anti-E identified. The DAT was negative and the RBC genotype of the patient was predicted to be negative for the E antigen whereas the platelet donor was predicted to be positive for E antigen. There is a risk of alloimmunization of non-RhD antigen from platelet pheresis transfusion even in a patient less than 2 years old.


Subject(s)
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute , Platelet Transfusion , Humans , Male , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy , Infant , Platelet Transfusion/adverse effects , Plateletpheresis , Isoantibodies/immunology , Isoantibodies/blood , Thrombocytopenia/therapy , Thrombocytopenia/etiology , Thrombocytopenia/immunology
12.
Semin Nephrol ; 43(6): 151479, 2023 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38195304

ABSTRACT

Intermittent hemodialysis (HD) is almost invariably performed with heparin, and thus HD patients are at risk of developing the immune-mediated adverse effect heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), caused by anti-platelet factor 4/heparin IgG, which strongly activates platelets. HIT patients develop hypercoagulability with greatly increased risk of thrombosis, both venous and arterial. Certain HIT-associated complications are more likely to develop among HD patients, including hemofilter thrombosis despite heparin, intravascular catheter and/or arteriovenous fistula-associated thrombosis, post-heparin bolus anaphylactoid/anaphylactic reactions, and thrombotic stroke and acute limb artery thrombosis (reflecting the high frequency of underlying arteriopathy in many patients with renal failure). Management of HIT in HD usually requires use of an alternative (non-heparin) anticoagulant; for example, danaparoid sodium (outside the USA) or argatroban (USA and elsewhere). Whether heparin-grafted hemodialyzers (without systemic heparin) can be used safely in acute HIT is unknown. The HIT immune response is remarkably transient and usually not retriggered by subsequent heparin administration. Accordingly, since renal failure patients often require long-term HD, there may be the opportunity-following seroreversion (loss of platelet-activating HIT antibodies)-to restart heparin for HD, a practice that appears to have a low likelihood of retriggering HIT.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants , Heparin , Renal Dialysis , Thrombocytopenia , Humans , Heparin/adverse effects , Heparin/immunology , Thrombocytopenia/chemically induced , Thrombocytopenia/immunology , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Anticoagulants/immunology , Platelet Factor 4/immunology , Thrombosis/immunology , Thrombosis/chemically induced
13.
Clin Imaging ; 90: 63-70, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35926315

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Cerebral Venous Thrombosis (CVT), prior to the COVID pandemic, was rare representing 0.5 of all strokes, with the diagnosis made by MRI or CT venography.1-,3 COVID-19 patients compared to general populations have a 30-60 times greater risk of CVT compared to non-affected populations, and up to a third of severe COVID patients may have thrombotic complications.4-8 Currently, vaccines are the best way to prevent severe COVID-19. In February 2021, reports of CVT and Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) related to adenovirus viral vector vaccines including the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine (AZD1222 (ChAdOx1)) and Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccine (JNJ-78436735 (Ad26.COV2·S)), were noted, with a 1/583,000 incidence from Johnson and Johnson vaccine in the United States.11, 12 This study retrospectively analyzed CVT and cross-sectional venography at an Eastern Medical Center from 2018 to 2021, and presents radiographic examples of CVT and what is learned from the immune response. METHODS: After IRB approval, a retrospective review of cross-sectional CTV and MRVs from January 1st 2018 to April 30th 2021, at a single health system was performed. Indications, vaccine status, patient age, sex, and positive finding incidence were specifically assessed during March and April for each year. A multivariable-adjusted trends analysis using Poisson regression estimated venogram frequencies and multivariable logistic regression compared sex, age, indications and vaccination status. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: From January 1, 2018 to April 30, 2021, (Fig. 1), a total of n = 2206 in patient and emergency room cross-sectional venograms were obtained, with 322 CTVs and 1884 MRVs. In 2018, 2019, 2020, respective totals of cross-sectional venograms were 568, 657, 660, compared to 321 cross-sectional venograms in the first four months of 2021. CTV in 2018, 2019, 2020, respective totals were 51, 86, 97, MRV totals were 517, 571, 563, compared to the 2021 first four month totals of 88 CTVs and 233 MRVs. March, April 2018, 2019, 2020, CTVs respectively were 6, 17, 11, compared to the 2021 first four months of 59 CTVs, comprising 63% of the total 93 CTVs, respective MRVs were 79, 97, 52, compared to 143 MRVs in the first four months of 2021 for 39% of the total 371 MRVs. In March, April 2020 during the pandemic onset, cross-sectional imaging at the East Coast Medical Center decreased, as priorities were on maintaining patient ventilation, high level of care and limiting spread of disease. In March/April 2021, reports of VITT and CVT likely contributed to increased CTVs and MRVs, of 39.65% [1.20-1.63] increase (P < 0.001) from prior. In March, April 2021 of 202 venograms obtained, 158 (78.2.%) were unvaccinated patients, 16 positive for CVT (10.1%), 44 were on vaccinated patients (21.7%), 8 specifically ordered with vaccination as a clinical indication, 2 positive for CVT (4.5%), (odds ratio = 0.52 [0.12-2.38], p = 0.200). CONCLUSION: CTV prior to the COVID pandemic, was rare, responsible for 0.5 of all strokes, at the onset of the pandemic in the East Coast, overall cross-sectional imaging volumes declined due to maintaining ventilation, high levels of care and limiting disease spread, although COVID-19 patients have a 30-60 times greater risk of CVT compared to the general population, and vaccination is currently the best option to mitigate severe disease. In early 2021, reports of adenoviral vector COVID vaccines causing CTV and VITT, led to at 39.65% increase in cross-sectional venography, however, in this study unvaccinated patients in 2021 had higher incidence of CVT (10.1%), compared to the vaccinated patients (4.5%). Clinicians should be aware that VITT CVT may present with a headache 5-30 days post-vaccination with thrombosis best diagnosed on CTV or MRV. If thrombosis is present with thrombocytopenia, platelets <150 × 109, elevated D-Dimer >4000 FEU, and positive anti-PF4 ELISA assay, the diagnosis is definitive.13 VITT CVT resembles spontaneous autoimmune heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), and is postulated to occur from platelet factor 4 (PF4) binding to vaccine adenoviral vectors forming a novel antigen, anti-PF4 memory B-cells and anti-PF4 (VITT) antibodies.14-17.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Intracranial Thrombosis , Thrombocytopenia , Venous Thrombosis , Ad26COVS1 , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , Humans , Immunity , Intracranial Thrombosis/chemically induced , Intracranial Thrombosis/immunology , Retrospective Studies , Thrombocytopenia/chemically induced , Thrombocytopenia/immunology , Venous Thrombosis/chemically induced , Venous Thrombosis/immunology
15.
J Leukoc Biol ; 111(3): 725-734, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34467562

ABSTRACT

Following on from the devastating spread of COVID-19, a major global priority has been the production, procurement, and distribution of effective vaccines to ensure that the global pandemic reaches an end. However, concerns were raised about worrying side effects, particularly the occurrence of thrombosis and thrombocytopenia after administration of the Oxford/AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson's Janssen COVID-19 vaccine, in a phenomenon being termed vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT). Similar to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), this condition has been associated with the development of anti-platelet factor 4 antibodies, purportedly leading to neutrophil-platelet aggregate formation. Although thrombosis has also been a common association with COVID-19, the precise molecular mechanisms governing its occurrence are yet to be established. Recently, increasing evidence highlights the NLRP3 (NOD-like, leucine-rich repeat domains, and pyrin domain-containing protein) inflammasome complex along with IL-1ß and effete neutrophils producing neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) through NETosis. Herein, we propose and discuss that perhaps the incidence of VITT may be due to inflammatory reactions mediated via IL-1ß/NLRP3 inflammasome activation and consequent overproduction of NETs, where similar autoimmune mechanisms are observed in HIT. We also discuss avenues by which such modalities could be treated to prevent the occurrence of adverse events and ensure vaccine rollouts remain safe and on target to end the current pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , COVID-19/prevention & control , Extracellular Traps/immunology , Thrombocytopenia/etiology , Animals , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines/therapeutic use , Humans , Inflammasomes/immunology , Interleukin-1beta/immunology , NLR Family, Pyrin Domain-Containing 3 Protein/immunology , Thrombocytopenia/immunology , Thrombocytopenia/prevention & control , Thrombocytopenia/therapy
16.
Blood ; 139(3): 369-383, 2022 01 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34424963

ABSTRACT

Pediatric Evans syndrome (pES) is increasingly identified as the presenting manifestation of several inborn errors of immunity. Despite an improved understanding of genetic defects in pES, the underlying immunobiology of pES is poorly defined, and characteristic diagnostic immune parameters are lacking. We describe the immune characteristics of 24 patients with pES and compared them with 22 patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenia (cITP) and 24 healthy controls (HCs). Compared with patients with cITP and HC, patients with pES had increased circulating T-follicular helper cells (cTfh), increased T-cell activation, and decreased naïve CD4+ T cells for age. Despite normal or high immunoglobulin G (IgG) in most pES at presentation, class-switched memory B cells were decreased. Within the cTfh subset, we noted features of postactivation exhaustion with upregulation of several canonical checkpoint inhibitors. T-cell receptor ß chain (TCR-ß) repertoire analysis of cTfh cells revealed increased oligoclonality in patients with pES compared with HCs. Among patients with pES, those without a known gene defect had a similar characteristic immune abnormality as patients with defined genetic defects. Similarly, patients with pES with normal IgG had similar T-cell abnormalities as patients with low IgG. Because genetic defects have been identified in less than half of patients with pES, our findings of similar immune abnormalities across all patients with pES help establish a common characteristic immunopathology in pES, irrespective of the underlying genetic etiology.


Subject(s)
Anemia, Hemolytic, Autoimmune/immunology , Lymphocyte Activation , T-Lymphocytes, Helper-Inducer/immunology , Thrombocytopenia/immunology , Adolescent , Adult , Anemia, Hemolytic, Autoimmune/pathology , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic/immunology , Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic/pathology , T-Lymphocytes, Helper-Inducer/pathology , Thrombocytopenia/pathology , Young Adult
17.
Crit Care Med ; 50(1): e80-e86, 2022 01 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34259661

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia is an unexpected consequence of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic era. We reviewed the pathogenesis, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of this rare side effect. DATA SOURCES: Online search of published medical literature through PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar using the terms "COVID-19," "vaccine," "thrombosis" was performed. STUDY SELECTION: Articles were chosen for inclusion based on their relevance to coronavirus disease 2019, vaccine, and thrombosis. DATA SYNTHESIS: Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia manifests most often as unusual thromboses (cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, splanchnic vein thrombosis) but sometimes also "usual" thromboses (arterial stroke, pulmonary embolism, deep-vein thrombosis), with oftentimes severe thrombocytopenia, that becomes clinically evident 5-30 days after adenovirus-vectored coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine administration. Most patients have disseminated intravascular coagulation. These features are the result of vaccine-triggered formation of anti-platelet factor 4 immunoglobulin G that activate platelets, clinically mimicking autoimmune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Early recognition based on thrombosis (sometimes, hemorrhage), thrombocytopenia, and d-dimer elevation within the day 5-30 postvaccine "window" is important given treatment with high-dose IV immunoglobulin plus nonheparin anticoagulation. CONCLUSIONS: Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia is a serious complication of vaccination that is not feasible to anticipate or prevent. When the patient presents with sustained headache, neurologic symptoms/signs, abdominal pain, dyspnea, or limb pain/swelling beginning 5-30 days post vaccination, platelet count and d-dimer must be measured, and imaging for thrombosis performed. Confirmation of vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia diagnosis should be ordered (platelet factor 4/polyanion enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; platelet factor 4-enhanced platelet activation testing) as treatment is initiated (nonheparin anticoagulation, IV immunoglobulin).


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Thrombocytopenia/chemically induced , Thrombosis/chemically induced , Age Factors , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Sex Factors , Thrombocytopenia/immunology , Thrombosis/immunology
18.
Int J Mol Sci ; 22(19)2021 Oct 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34639132

ABSTRACT

Novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 has resulted in a global pandemic with worldwide 6-digit infection rates and thousands of death tolls daily. Enormous efforts are undertaken to achieve high coverage of immunization to reach herd immunity in order to stop the spread of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Several SARS-CoV-2 vaccines based on mRNA, viral vectors, or inactivated SARS-CoV-2 virus have been approved and are being applied worldwide. However, the recent increased numbers of normally very rare types of thromboses associated with thrombocytopenia have been reported, particularly in the context of the adenoviral vector vaccine ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 from Astra Zeneca. The statistical prevalence of these side effects seems to correlate with this particular vaccine type, i.e., adenoviral vector-based vaccines, but the exact molecular mechanisms are still not clear. The present review summarizes current data and hypotheses for molecular and cellular mechanisms into one integrated hypothesis indicating that coagulopathies, including thromboses, thrombocytopenia, and other related side effects, are correlated to an interplay of the two components in the vaccine, i.e., the spike antigen and the adenoviral vector, with the innate and immune systems, which under certain circumstances can imitate the picture of a limited COVID-19 pathological picture.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , COVID-19/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/immunology , Thrombocytopenia/etiology , Thrombosis/etiology , Adenoviridae/immunology , Animals , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , Genetic Vectors/adverse effects , Genetic Vectors/immunology , Humans , Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic/etiology , Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic/immunology , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/adverse effects , Thrombocytopenia/immunology , Thrombosis/immunology , Vaccination/adverse effects
20.
Cells ; 10(10)2021 10 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34685765

ABSTRACT

Several recent reports have highlighted the onset of vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopaenia (VITT) in some recipients (approximately 1 case out of 100k exposures) of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (AstraZeneca). Although the underlying events leading to this blood-clotting phenomenon has yet to be elucidated, several critical observations present a compelling potential mechanism. Thrombus formation requires the von Willebrand (VWF) protein to be in ultra-large multimeric state. The conservation of this state is controlled by the ADAMTS13 enzyme, whose proteolytic activity reduces the size of VWF multimers, keeping blood clotting at bay. However, ADAMTS13 cannot act on VWF that is bound to platelet factor 4 (PF4). As such, it is of particular interest to note that a common feature between subjects presenting with VITT is high titres of antibodies against PF4. This raises the possibility that these antibodies preserve the stability of ultra-large VWF complexes, leading to the formation of endothelium-anchored VWF strings, which are capable of recruiting circulating platelets and causing uncontrolled thrombosis in terminal capillaries. Here, we share our viewpoint about the current understanding of the VITT pathogenesis involving the prevention of ADAMTS13's activity on VWF by PF4 antibody-mediated stabilisation/ protection of the PF4-VWF complex.


Subject(s)
ADAMTS13 Protein/metabolism , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , COVID-19/prevention & control , Thrombocytopenia/immunology , Antibodies , Autoantibodies/immunology , Blood Platelets/metabolism , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , Crystallography, X-Ray , Endothelial Cells/immunology , Humans , Platelet Factor 4/metabolism , Polymorphism, Genetic , Protein Domains , Thrombocytopenia/etiology , Thrombosis/etiology , von Willebrand Factor/metabolism
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...