Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 9.190
Filter
1.
Neurology ; 103(4): e209664, 2024 Aug 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39102615

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In patients with mechanical heart valves and recent intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), clinicians need to balance the risk of thromboembolism during the period off anticoagulation and the risk of hematoma expansion on anticoagulation. The optimal timing of anticoagulation resumption is unknown. We aimed to investigate the relationship between reversal therapy and ischemic stroke, between duration off anticoagulation and risk of ischemic strokes or systemic embolism and between timing of anticoagulation resumption and risk of rebleeding and ICH expansion. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort observational study in 3 tertiary hospitals. Consecutive adult patients with mechanical heart valves admitted for ICH between January 1, 2000, and July 13, 2022, were included. The primary end points of our study were thromboembolic events (cerebral, retinal, or systemic) while off anticoagulation and ICH expansion after anticoagulation resumption (defined by the following criteria: increase by one-third in intracerebral hematoma volume, increase by one-third in convexity subdural hemorrhage diameter, or visually unequivocal expansion of other ICH locations to the naked eye). RESULTS: A total of 171 patients with mechanical heart valves who experienced ICH were included in the final analysis. Most of the patients (79.5%) received reversal therapy for anticoagulation. Patients who received anticoagulation reversal therapy did not have increased risk of thromboembolic complications. Time off anticoagulation was not associated with risk of ischemic stroke; only 2 patients had a stroke within 7 days of the ICH, and both had additional major risk factors of thromboembolism. The rate of ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack while off anticoagulation was lower than the rate of ICH expansion once anticoagulation was resumed (6.4% vs 9.9%). Furthermore, patients who developed ICH expansion had higher mortality compared with patients who had ischemic stroke while being off anticoagulation (41% vs 9%). Use of intravenous heparin bridging upon resumption of warfarin was strongly associated with increased risk of ICH expansion as compared with restarting warfarin without a heparin bridge. DISCUSSION: Withholding anticoagulation for at least 7 days after ICH may be safe in patients with mechanical heart valves. Heparin bridging during anticoagulation resumption may be associated with increased risk of bleeding.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants , Intracranial Hemorrhages , Thromboembolism , Humans , Male , Female , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Aged , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , Intracranial Hemorrhages/chemically induced , Intracranial Hemorrhages/epidemiology , Thromboembolism/prevention & control , Thromboembolism/etiology , Heart Valve Prosthesis/adverse effects , Ischemic Stroke , Time Factors , Risk Factors , Aged, 80 and over
4.
Thromb Res ; 241: 109107, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39096849

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although anticoagulants may potentially increase the risk of post-colonoscopy bleeding events, temporary discontinuation of medications could elevate the risk of thromboembolism (TE). There is a paucity of data regarding the incidence of bleeding and TE events in patients undergoing colonoscopy while on uninterrupted or interrupted anticoagulant therapy. Therefore, we aimed to ascertain the risks of post-colonoscopy TE and bleeding in patients with continuous or interrupted use of anticoagulant agents. METHODS: The electronic databases of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library were comprehensively searched from inception to March 15, 2024. We identified studies reporting the incidence of bleeding and TE events in patients undergoing colonoscopy with uninterrupted or interrupted anticoagulant therapy. The pooled incidence rate of bleeding and TE events was estimated using a random-effects model. RESULTS: This study included a total of 15 studies involving 63, 017 patients. Overall, the incidence of post-procedural bleeding for uninterrupted and interrupted direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) was found to be 3.60 % (95 % CI: 1.60 %-5.60 %), and 0.90 % (95 % CI: 0.10 %-10.30 %), respectively. Subgroup analysis revealed that older age patients (≥65 years) had a significantly higher rate of bleeding with uninterrupted DOACs therapy compared to younger age patients (< 65 years) (7.20 % vs. 2.00 %). The highest rate of bleeding was observed in Asia (7.20 %, 95 % CI: 2.20 %-12.10 %). Similarly, the risk of bleeding was significantly increased among patients interrupting DOACs therapy in Asia compared to North America (1.40 % vs. 0.26 %). For patients on uninterrupted and interrupted warfarin, a higher rate of bleeding events was observed in older age patients than younger age patients (4.90 % vs. 0.80 %, and 2.20 % vs. 1.70 %, respectively). Uninterrupted warfarin showed a more significant risk of bleeding in Asia (4.20 %, 95%CI: 1.90 %-6.60 %) compared to North America (1.00 %, 95%CI: 0.50 %-1.50 %). Among those who did not interrupt DOACs therapy, the incidence of TE was the lowest (0.08 %, 95%CI: 0.04 %-0.11 %). CONCLUSION: This study provides a comprehensive assessment of bleeding and TE risks in patients undergoing colonoscopy while receiving uninterrupted or interrupted anticoagulant therapy in the real-world setting. The overall incidence of post-colonoscopy bleeding and TE events is relatively low. However, the uninterrupted DOACs and warfarin are associated with an elevated risk of bleeding, particularly among elderly patients and the Asian population.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants , Colonoscopy , Hemorrhage , Thromboembolism , Humans , Colonoscopy/adverse effects , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Thromboembolism/etiology , Thromboembolism/epidemiology , Thromboembolism/prevention & control , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Male , Female , Aged , Incidence , Middle Aged
5.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(8): e2432190, 2024 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39212983

ABSTRACT

Importance: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) predisposes individuals to early cardiovascular (CV) events. While hydroxychloroquine is thought to mitigate CV risk factors, its protective role against CV events, particularly arterial ones, remains to be confirmed. Objective: To evaluate the association between hydroxychloroquine and the risk of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and other thromboembolic events (OTEs) in patients with SLE. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study using a nested case-control design was conducted within the National French Healthcare Database (SNDS), which represents 99% of the French population, from 2010 to 2020. Participants were the cohort of all patients with SLE recorded in the SNDS. Patients with SLE experiencing CV events during the study period were the case group; those without CV events were controls. The analysis period was from February 2022 to September 2023. Exposures: Hydroxychloroquine use within 365 days prior to the index date, defined as current (within 90 days), remote (91-365 days), or no exposure within the previous 365 days. Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcomes of interest were MI, stroke, and OTE, analyzed individually and as a composite outcome (primary analysis). Controls were matched to patients with CV events by age, sex, time since SLE onset and entry into the SNDS database, index date, prior antithrombotic and CV medication, chronic kidney disease, and hospitalization. Multivariable conditional logistic regression was performed using hydroxychloroquine exposure as the main independent variable. Results: The SLE cohort included 52 883 patients (mean [SD] age, 44.23 [16.09] years; 45 255 [86.6%] female; mean [SD] follow-up, 9.01 [2.51] years), including 1981 patients with eligible CV events and 16 892 matched control patients. There were 669 MI events, 916 stroke events, and 696 OTEs in the individual outcome studies. For current exposure to hydroxychloroquine, the adjusted odds were lower for composite CV events (odds ratio [OR], 0.63; 95% CI, 0.57-0.69) as well as for MI (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.60-0.85), stroke (OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.60-0.81), and OTEs (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.49-0.69) individually compared with no hydroxychloroquine exposure within 365 days. Conclusions and Relevance: In this nationwide cohort study of patients with SLE, a protective association was found between the current use of hydroxychloroquine and the occurrence of CV events, but not between remote use of hydroxychloroquine and CV outcomes, highlighting the value of continuous hydroxychloroquine treatment in patients with SLE.


Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents , Cardiovascular Diseases , Hydroxychloroquine , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic , Humans , Hydroxychloroquine/therapeutic use , Hydroxychloroquine/adverse effects , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/drug therapy , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/complications , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Case-Control Studies , Adult , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology , Myocardial Infarction/chemically induced , Stroke/epidemiology , Stroke/prevention & control , Cohort Studies , France/epidemiology , Thromboembolism/epidemiology , Thromboembolism/prevention & control , Risk Factors , Aged
8.
JAMA Neurol ; 81(8): 835-844, 2024 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38976246

ABSTRACT

Importance: Direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are commonly prescribed with antiseizure medications (ASMs) due to concurrency of and the association between atrial fibrillation (AF) and epilepsy. However, enzyme-inducing (EI) ASMs may reduce absorption and accelerate metabolism of DOACs, potentially lowering DOAC levels and elevating thromboembolism risk. Objective: To assess the rates of thromboembolic and major bleeding events in adults with AF and epilepsy dispensed DOACs and EI ASMs vs DOACs with non-EI ASMs. Design, Setting, and Participants: This active-comparator, new-user cohort study included US health care data from the Clinformatics Data Mart database from October 2010 to September 2021 for a nationally representative population of adults with AF and epilepsy. Exposure: Evaluations included episodes of contiguous coadministration of DOACs for AF with EI ASMs (exposed) or non-EI ASMs (referent) for epilepsy. Main Outcomes and Measures: Thromboembolic events (primary outcome) and major bleeding events (secondary outcome) were identified based on a series of validated, diagnosis-based coding algorithms. Data-adaptive, high-dimensional propensity score matching was used to control for observed confounders and proxies for unobserved confounders. Adjusted hazard ratios (AHRs) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression models with robust variance estimators to account for clustering within matched pairs. Results: This study included 14 078 episodes (median age, 74 [IQR, 67-81]; 52.4% female) and 14 158 episodes (median age, 74 [IQR, 67-81]; 52.4% female) of incident DOAC and ASM use that met eligibility criteria for assessment of thromboembolic and major bleeding outcomes, respectively. Incidence was 88.5 per 1000 person-years for thromboembolic events and 68.3 per 1000 person-years for bleeding events. Compared with use of non-EI ASMs, use of EI ASMs with DOACs was not associated with a difference in risk of thromboembolic events (AHR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.82-1.46) but was associated with a reduction in risk of major bleeding events (AHR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.44-0.89). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, EI ASMs were not associated with alteration in DOAC efficacy. Further research is needed on the reduction in bleeding risk associated with EI ASMs, as this may suggest that pharmacokinetic interactions are associated with lowering DOAC levels without negating therapeutic effects.


Subject(s)
Anticonvulsants , Atrial Fibrillation , Epilepsy , Thromboembolism , Humans , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Atrial Fibrillation/epidemiology , Female , Male , Thromboembolism/epidemiology , Thromboembolism/prevention & control , Aged , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Anticonvulsants/administration & dosage , Anticonvulsants/adverse effects , Epilepsy/drug therapy , Middle Aged , Cohort Studies , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Aged, 80 and over , Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Administration, Oral , Factor Xa Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Factor Xa Inhibitors/administration & dosage
9.
Eur Heart J ; 45(32): 2983-2991, 2024 Aug 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38993069

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Concerns about the safety of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines in patients with atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF/AFL) have arisen due to reports of thrombo-embolic events following COVID-19 vaccination in the general population. This study aimed to evaluate the risk of thrombo-embolic events after COVID-19 vaccination in patients with AF/AFL. METHODS: This was a modified self-controlled case-series study using a comprehensive nationwide-linked database provided by the National Health Insurance Service in South Korea to calculate incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of thrombo-embolic events. The study population included individuals aged ≥12 years who were either vaccinated (e.g. one or two doses) or unvaccinated during the period from February to December 2021. The primary outcome was a composite of thrombo-embolic events, including ischaemic stroke, transient ischaemic attack, and systemic thromboembolism. The risk period was defined as 0-21 days following COVID-19 vaccination. RESULTS: The final analysis included 124 127 individuals with AF/AFL. The IRR of thrombo-embolic events within 21 days after COVID-19 vaccination, compared with that during the unexposed control period, was 0.93 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77-1.12]. No significant risk variations were noted by sex, age, or vaccine type. However, patients without anticoagulant therapy had an IRR of 1.88 (95% CI 1.39-2.54) following vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with AF/AFL, COVID-19 vaccination was generally not associated with an increased risk of thrombo-embolic events. However, careful individual risk assessment is required when advising vaccination for those not on oral anticoagulant, as these patients exhibited an increased risk of thrombo-embolic events post-vaccination.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Thromboembolism , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Atrial Fibrillation/epidemiology , Atrial Flutter/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Incidence , Republic of Korea/epidemiology , Thromboembolism/prevention & control , Thromboembolism/epidemiology , Thromboembolism/etiology , Vaccination/adverse effects
10.
Br J Sports Med ; 58(18): 1075-1082, 2024 Sep 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38997148

ABSTRACT

Orthopaedic and sports medicine clinicians can improve outcomes for transgender patients by understanding the physiological effects of gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT). This narrative review investigated the role of GAHT on bone mineral density, fracture risk, thromboembolic risk, cardiovascular health and ligament/tendon injury in this population. A search from the PubMed database using relevant terms was performed. Studies were included if they were levels 1-3 evidence. Due to the paucity of studies on ligament and tendon injury risk in transgender patients, levels 1-3 evidence on the effects of sex hormones in cisgender patients as well as basic science studies were included for these two topics. This review found that transgender patients on GAHT have an elevated fracture risk, but GAHT has beneficial effects on bone mineral density in transgender women. Transgender women on GAHT also have an increased risk of venous thromboembolism, stroke and myocardial infarction compared with cisgender women. Despite these elevated risks, studies have found it is safe to continue GAHT perioperatively for both transgender women and men undergoing low-risk operations. Orthopaedic and sports medicine clinicians should understand these unique health considerations for equitable patient care.


Subject(s)
Bone Density , Sports Medicine , Transgender Persons , Humans , Male , Female , Fractures, Bone/prevention & control , Fractures, Bone/etiology , Orthopedics , Tendon Injuries/therapy , Thromboembolism/prevention & control , Thromboembolism/etiology
12.
Crit Care ; 28(1): 221, 2024 Jul 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38970010

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is currently a lack of evidence for the comparative effectiveness of Andexanet alpha and four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) in anticoagulation reversal of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). The primary aim of our systematic review was to verify which drug is more effective in reducing short-term all-cause mortality. The secondary aim was to determine which of the two reverting strategies is less affected by thromboembolic events. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. RESULTS: Twenty-two studies were analysed in the systematic review and quantitative synthesis. In all-cause short-term mortality, Andexanet alpha showed a risk ratio (RR) of 0.71(95% CI 0.37-1.34) in RCTs and PSMs, compared to 4F-PCC (I2 = 81%). Considering the retrospective studies, the pooled RR resulted in 0.84 (95% CI 0.69-1.01) for the common effects model and 0.82 (95% CI 0.63-1.07) for the random effects model (I2 = 34.2%). Regarding the incidence of thromboembolic events, for RCTs and PSMs, the common and the random effects model exhibited a RR of 1.74 (95% CI 1.09-2.77), and 1.71 (95% CI 1.01-2.89), respectively, for Andexanet alpha compared to 4F-PCC (I2 = 0%). Considering the retrospective studies, the pooled RR resulted in 1.21 (95% CI 0.87-1.69) for the common effects model and 1.18 (95% CI 0.86-1.62) for the random effects model (I2 = 0%). CONCLUSION: Considering a large group of both retrospective and controlled studies, Andexanet alpha did not show a statistically significant advantage over 4F-PCC in terms of mortality. In the analysis of the controlled studies alone, Andexanet alpha is associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic events. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO: International prospective register of systematic reviews, 2024, CRD42024548768.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants , Blood Coagulation Factors , Humans , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Blood Coagulation Factors/therapeutic use , Blood Coagulation Factors/pharmacology , Factor Xa/therapeutic use , Factor Xa Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Factor Xa Inhibitors/adverse effects , Recombinant Proteins , Thromboembolism/prevention & control
13.
S D Med ; 77(5): 213-219, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39012774

ABSTRACT

Heart failure (HF) is a common disorder associated with significant morbidity and mortality. It can increase the risk of thromboembolic events, which subsequently lead to increased risk of stroke, ischemic heart disease, thromboembolism, and death. Antithrombotic therapy has been investigated as a potential management strategy for HF patients in sinus rhythm, but its efficacy remains uncertain. Current guidelines do not recommend the routine use of antithrombotics in patients with HF in sinus rhythm without any other indication for their use. Several randomized controlled trials have investigated the efficacy of antithrombotics in HF patients in sinus rhythm. This article provides a concise review of the existing literature to assess the evidence supporting the use of antithrombotics in HF patients in sinus rhythm. The use of warfarin or other anticoagulants has demonstrated a lower risk of stroke but an increased risk of bleeding. The studies demonstrate that anticoagulant therapy in HF patients in sinus rhythm does not provide significant benefits in terms of overall ischemic events or death.


Subject(s)
Fibrinolytic Agents , Heart Failure , Humans , Heart Failure/drug therapy , Heart Failure/complications , Fibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Warfarin/therapeutic use , Warfarin/adverse effects , Thromboembolism/prevention & control , Stroke/prevention & control , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use
14.
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi ; 104(28): 2595-2612, 2024 Jul 23.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39019816

ABSTRACT

Oral anticoagulants are widely used in the home care of patients who require prevention and treatment of thromboembolic diseases. The irrational use of anticoagulants may cause thrombosis and hemorrhage. Currently, there are no national or international guidelines or consensus providing recommendations for home management of oral anticoagulants. Therefore, the Hospital Pharmacy Professional Committee of the Chinese Pharmaceutical Association organized domestic experts in the fields of clinical pharmacy, cardiovascular surgery, cardiovascular medicine, vascular surgery, respiratory medicine and laboratory science to sort out the relevant issues and compile the expert consensus on the home management of oral anticoagulants. The main contents of this consensus include pharmacological monitoring of oral anticoagulants, the process and precautions of carrying out home management of oral anticoagulants, and treatment of some special conditions during home management, with the aim of enhancing the safety and effectiveness of oral anticoagulants' usage and reducing the adverse events.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants , Humans , Administration, Oral , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , China , Consensus , Drug Monitoring , Home Care Services , Thromboembolism/prevention & control
15.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv ; 17(14): 1680-1690, 2024 Jul 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39048255

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Thromboembolic events, particularly strokes, remain a major complication of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Embolic protection devices have failed to show significant clinical benefit in large randomized clinical trials. Aortic wall thrombus (AWT) is often observed on multidetector computed tomography during TAVR work-up, but its prognostic significance is uncertain. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the association between the presence of AWT and the incidence of thromboembolic outcomes in patients undergoing transfemoral (TF) TAVR for severe aortic stenosis. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study of consecutive patients who underwent TF TAVR for severe aortic stenosis between January 2011 and April 2022. A dedicated scale (range: 0-10) was qualitatively used to assess AWT. The primary outcome was a composite of procedural thromboembolic events defined as ischemic stroke, blue toe syndrome, bowel ischemia, or other solid organ infarction. The secondary endpoints were ischemic strokes and procedural death. RESULTS: Of the 641 patients included, severe AWT (score ≥8) was identified in 73 (11.4%). The presence of severe AWT was strongly associated with an increase in the primary outcome (OR: 8.48; 95% CI: 3.36-21.40; P < 0.001). This relationship persisted following multivariable analysis, which adjusted for comorbidities and procedural characteristics. The presence of severe AWT was also found to be associated with an increased incidence of stroke and procedural death (OR: 5.66; 95% CI: 2.00-15.30; P = 0.002 and OR: 4.66; 95% CI: 1.80-11.30; P = 0.002, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of severe AWT on preprocedural multidetector computed tomography is strongly associated with thromboembolic complications including stroke and mortality after TF TAVR.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis , Femoral Artery , Severity of Illness Index , Thromboembolism , Thrombosis , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Humans , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/mortality , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/instrumentation , Female , Male , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve Stenosis/mortality , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Aged , Femoral Artery/diagnostic imaging , Thrombosis/diagnostic imaging , Thrombosis/etiology , Thrombosis/mortality , Thrombosis/epidemiology , Treatment Outcome , Thromboembolism/etiology , Thromboembolism/diagnostic imaging , Thromboembolism/mortality , Thromboembolism/prevention & control , Incidence , Risk Assessment , Time Factors , Aortic Valve/surgery , Aortic Valve/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve/physiopathology , Multidetector Computed Tomography , Catheterization, Peripheral/adverse effects , Catheterization, Peripheral/mortality , Aortic Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Diseases/mortality , Punctures
16.
Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev ; 13(9): 961-973, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39046333

ABSTRACT

With many available data sources, clinicians need to consider the benefit-risk profile of individual anticoagulants when balancing the need for anticoagulation, including evaluating the risks in patients with comorbidities and potential drug-drug interactions. This narrative review presents clinical data across multiple phases of drug development for the use of apixaban, a selective factor Xa inhibitor, when taken concomitantly with other agents, and evaluates the benefit-risk profile of apixaban with these interacting medications. Key subgroup analyses from the phase 3 ARISTOTLE trial (NCT00412984) are presented using data from patients who received either concomitant inhibitors or inducers of cytochrome P450 3A4 and/or P­glycoprotein. We also review the available evidence for the use of apixaban in patients with cancer-associated thromboembolism, as well as the use of apixaban in patients with COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Drug Interactions , Factor Xa Inhibitors , Pyrazoles , Pyridones , Humans , Factor Xa Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Factor Xa Inhibitors/adverse effects , Factor Xa Inhibitors/pharmacokinetics , Pyridones/administration & dosage , Pyridones/adverse effects , Pyridones/pharmacokinetics , Pyrazoles/administration & dosage , Pyrazoles/adverse effects , Pyrazoles/pharmacokinetics , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Thromboembolism/prevention & control , Risk Assessment , COVID-19 , Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Anticoagulants/pharmacokinetics , Neoplasms/drug therapy
17.
Thromb Res ; 241: 109093, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39003950

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: A variety of thromboprophylaxis regimens have been administered in patients following the Fontan procedure. However, consensus guidelines regarding the optimal thromboprophylaxis strategy have not yet been developed. METHOD: A network meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the comparative effectiveness among available thromboprophylaxis regimens and major bleeding events associated with these regimens. RESULTS: A total of 28 comparative studies with 4430 Fontan patients were included. The incidence of thromboembolic events (TE) was significantly lower in individuals who underwent thromboprophylaxis compared to those who did not. Compared to a no-treatment strategy, nonvitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) showed the largest treatment effect for preventing TE (OR = 0.08, 95 % CI 0.03 to 0.21), followed by warfarin (OR = 0.16, 95 % CI 0.10 to 0.27), and aspirin (OR = 0.23, 95 % CI 0.14 to 0.38). Indeed, NOACs were significantly more effective than aspirin in preventing TE (OR = 0.35, 95 % CI 0.14 to 0.84). Aspirin was associated with the lowest occurrence of major bleeding events, followed by NOACs, no medication, and warfarin. NOACs were shown to possess a highly favorable overall profile. CONCLUSION: Prescribing thromboprophylaxis drugs, either antiplatelets or anticoagulants, may be more effective in preventing TE after the Fontan operation than not doing so. Among the included regimens, NOACs demonstrated significantly greater efficacy than aspirin; however, they did not show statistically significant superiority over warfarin. Aspirin exhibited lower rates of major bleeding compared to both NOACs and warfarin. Overall, NOACs tended to offer the most advantageous balance of efficacy and safety. However, the findings should be interpreted considering the certainty and limitations of the evidence, including potential residual confounding in observational studies.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants , Fontan Procedure , Thromboembolism , Humans , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Aspirin/therapeutic use , Fontan Procedure/adverse effects , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Network Meta-Analysis , Thromboembolism/prevention & control , Thromboembolism/etiology , Warfarin/therapeutic use
19.
J Int Med Res ; 52(6): 3000605241258474, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38901839

ABSTRACT

The gold standard therapy for end-stage heart failure is cardiac transplantation. However, in the face of a donor shortage, a mechanical assist device such as the left ventricular assist device HeartMate 3 (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL, USA) serves as bridging therapy to transplantation and/or destination therapy. Current guidelines recommend anticoagulation with a vitamin K antagonist in combination with low-dose aspirin. We herein report a challenging anticoagulation regimen in a patient with a HeartMate 3 in whom systemic anticoagulation with warfarin was not feasible for 4 years because of low compatibility and a rare X-factor deficiency. This is a rare hematological disorder, estimated to affect approximately 1 in every 500,000 to 1,000,000 people in the general population. The patient finally received a modified anticoagulation regimen involving the combination of rivaroxaban and clopidogrel without warfarin. Under this regimen, the patient remained free of thromboembolic complications for 4 years with in situ placement of the left ventricular assist device. This case illustrates that under specific circumstances, long-term absence of warfarin therapy is feasible in patients with a HeartMate 3.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants , Heart-Assist Devices , Thromboembolism , Warfarin , Humans , Heart-Assist Devices/adverse effects , Warfarin/therapeutic use , Warfarin/administration & dosage , Thromboembolism/etiology , Thromboembolism/prevention & control , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Male , Heart Failure/surgery , Middle Aged , Clopidogrel/administration & dosage , Clopidogrel/therapeutic use , Clopidogrel/adverse effects , Rivaroxaban/administration & dosage , Rivaroxaban/therapeutic use , Withholding Treatment
20.
Br J Cancer ; 131(3): 481-490, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38862741

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Small-molecule inhibitors (SMIs) have revolutionised the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, SMI-induced drug-drug interactions (DDIs) with frequently co-administered direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), increase thromboembolic and bleeding risks. This study investigated and proactively managed the consequences of DOAC-SMI DDIs. METHODS: This prospective, observational study enrolled patients with NSCLC concomitantly using a DOAC and SMI. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with DOAC plasma trough (Ctrough) and peak (Cpeak) concentrations outside expected ranges. Secondary outcomes included DOAC treatment modifications, incidence of bleeding and thromboembolic events and feasibility evaluation of pharmacokinetically guided DOAC dosing. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients were analysed. Thirty-nine percent (13/33) had DOAC Ctrough and/or Cpeak were outside the expected ranges in 39% (13/33). In 71% (5/7) of patients with DOAC concentrations quantified before and during concurrent SMI use, DOAC Ctrough and/or Cpeak increased or decreased >50% upon SMI initiation. In all patients in whom treatment modifications were deemed necessary, DOAC concentrations were adjusted to within the expected ranges. CONCLUSION: Proactive monitoring showed that a substantial proportion of patients had DOAC concentrations outside the expected ranges. DOAC concentrations were successfully normalised after treatment modifications. These results highlight the importance of proactive monitoring of DOAC-SMI DDIs to improve treatment in patients with NSCLC.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Drug Interactions , Lung Neoplasms , Humans , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Male , Female , Aged , Prospective Studies , Middle Aged , Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Anticoagulants/pharmacokinetics , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Administration, Oral , Aged, 80 and over , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Drug Monitoring/methods , Factor Xa Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Factor Xa Inhibitors/pharmacokinetics , Factor Xa Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Thromboembolism/prevention & control
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL