ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Although there is a very high comorbidity between tobacco dependence and other addictive disorders, there are only few studies examining the implementation and outcomes of a tobacco cessation program in patients with addictive diseases. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate to what extent a standardized tobacco cessation program leads to improvements regarding psychological/physical parameters in patients with addiction undergoing therapy and whether there is a reduction in tobacco consumption. METHODS: The study took place in a therapeutic community specialized in addiction therapy. A total sample of 56 participants were non-randomly assigned to an intervention group (IG; n = 31) and a treatment as usual group (TAUG; n = 25). The IG participated in a 6-week tobacco cessation program, while the TAUG received no additional treatment. Both groups were assessed for changes in primary outcomes (tobacco dependence, smoked cigarettes per day (CPD), and general substance-related craving) and secondary outcomes (heart rate variability (HRV): root mean square of successive differences, self-efficacy, and comorbid psychiatric symptoms) at two measurement time points (pre- and post-treatment/6 weeks). RESULTS: We observed significant improvements in self-efficacy (F(1,53) = 5.86; p < .05; ηp2 = .11) and decreased CPD in the IG (ß = 1.16, ρ < .05), while no significant changes were observed in the TAUG. No significant interaction effects were observed in psychiatric symptoms, general substance-related craving, and HRV. CONCLUSIONS: The results highlight the potential benefit of an additional tobacco cessation program as part of a general addiction treatment. Although no improvements in the physiological domain were observed, there were significant improvements regarding self-efficacy and CPD in the IG compared to the TAUG. Randomized controlled trials on larger samples would be an important next step. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN15684371.
Subject(s)
Tobacco Use Cessation , Humans , Male , Pilot Projects , Female , Middle Aged , Adult , Treatment Outcome , Tobacco Use Cessation/methods , Tobacco Use Cessation/psychology , Tobacco Use Disorder/rehabilitation , Tobacco Use Disorder/psychology , Tobacco Use Disorder/therapyABSTRACT
Los estudios que examinan las asociaciones entre las medidas cognitivas y los aspectos clínicos del tabaquismo son limitados y, en general,se limitan a predecir perfiles de riesgo o recaídas. Sin embargo, esesencial comprender la influencia de varias medidas de la funciónejecutiva en la adicción a la nicotina a fin indagar factores asociadosal mantenimiento del tabaquismo. En el presente estudio se examinóla capacidad de la memoria de trabajo y el descuento por retraso parapredecir los años de tabaquismo. La muestra consistió en 180 fumadores que fueron evaluados en la línea de base con medidas de impulsividad cognitiva (Tarea de Descuento de Retraso) y memoria de trabajo[Prueba de Búsqueda y Atención Visual (VSAT) y Secuenciación deNúmeros de Letras (WAIS III)] mientras que la medida de resultadofue los años de adicción. De acuerdo con las predicciones, la memoriade trabajo evaluada con la Prueba de Búsqueda y Atención Visual fueun factor estadísticamente significativo para predecir los años de adicción a la nicotina. Estos hallazgos sugieren que la memoria de trabajoes clínicamente relevante en la dependencia de la nicotina y planteaun patrón de funcionamiento ejecutivo asociado al tabaquismo. (AU)
Studies examining associations between cognitive measures and clinical aspects of smoking are scarce and generally limited to predictingrisk profiles or relapses. However, it is essential to understand the influence of several measures of executive function in nicotine addiction in order to investigate factors associated with smoking maintenance. This study examined the ability of working memory and delaydiscount to predict years of smoking. The sample consisted of 180smokers who were assessed at baseline with measures of cognitiveimpulsivity (Delay Discounting Task) and working memory [VisualSearch and Attention Test (VSAT) and Letter-Number Sequencing(WAIS III)] while the outcome measure was years of smoking. Consistent with predictions, working memory evaluated with Visual Searchand Attention Test was a statistically significant factor in predictingyears of nicotine addiction. These findings suggest that working memory is clinically relevant in nicotine dependence and proposes a pattern of executive functioning associated with smoking. (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Tobacco Use Disorder/rehabilitation , Tobacco Use Disorder/therapy , Memory, Short-Term , Neuropsychology/methods , Delay Discounting , Addiction MedicineABSTRACT
Introducción. Los programas interdisciplinarios queincluyen tratamiento farmacológico y técnicas cognitivo-conductuales son efectivos en lograr la abstinenciatabáquica. Hay factores que condicionan el proceso de cesación. No hay estudios en Colombia de cesación tabáquica y los factores asociados. Pacientes y métodos.Pacientes consecutivos del programa de atención integral de cesación de tabaco de laFundación Neumológica Colombiana (EXFUMAIRE)de 2015-2019. Se definió cesación como la abstinencia al cigarrillo >12 meses. Diferencias entre grupos de cesación y no cesación con pruebas T, U de Mann-Whitney y χ2. Análisis multivariado para evaluar factores asociadosa la cesación.Resultados.Se incluyeron 170 sujetos de 55,8 ± 12,8años, el 50,6% mujeres. Hubo cesación en 113(66,5%). No hubo diferencias demográficas, historiade tabaquismo, comorbilidades o tratamiento farmacológico entre los grupos de cesación y no cesación. El 64,1% de los pacientes recibió terapia cognitivo-conductual y el 88,2% tratamiento farmacológico. La razón de no recibir terapia cognitivo-conductual fue la noaceptación del paciente, y la de no recibir tratamientofarmacológico la no disponibilidad del medicamento ono aceptación del paciente. El único factor asociado acesación en el análisis multivariado fue la motivaciónpor la escala Richmond (OR 0,81; p = 0,038).Conclusiones.La tasa de cesación de tabaquismo del66,5% fue alta. El único factor asociado con cesaciónfue la mayor motivación para cesar el tabaquismo. Lasbarreras para recibir el tratamiento farmacológico opsico-conductual son la no aceptación del paciente ola disponibilidad del medicamento. (AU)
Introduction. Interdisciplinary programs that include pharmacological treatment and cognitive behavioraltechniques are effective in achieving smoking abstinence. There are factors that condition the cessationprocess. There are no studies in Colombia on smokingcessation and the associated factors.Patients and methods.Consecutive patients of thecomprehensive smoking cessation care program of the Colombian Pneumological Foundation (EXFUMAIRE)from 2015-2019. Cessation was defined as abstinence from cigarettes >12 months. Differences between cessation and non-cessation groups with T-tests, Mann-Whitney U Test and χ2. Multivariate analysis to evaluatefactors associated with cessation.Results.A total of 170 subjects aged 55.8 ± 12.8years, 50.6% women were included. Cessation occurredin 113 (66.5%). There were no differences in the demographics, smoking history, comorbidities, or drug treatment between the cessation and non-cessation groups.A total of 64.1% of the patients received cognitivebehavioral therapy and 88.2% pharmacological treatment. The reason that cognitive behavioral therapy wasnot received was the non-acceptance of the patient and that of not receiving pharmacological treatment wasthe non-availability of the medication or non-acceptance of the patient. The only factor associated with smoking cessation in the multivariate analysis was the Richmond motivation scale (OR 0.81; p = 0.038).Conclusions.The smoking cessation rate of 66.5%was high. The only factor associated with cessation was the increased motivation to quit smoking. Barriers toreceive pharmacological or psycho-behavioral treatment are the non-acceptance of the patient or lack ofavailability of the medication. (AU)
Subject(s)
Tobacco Use Cessation/methods , Tobacco Use Cessation/psychology , Tobacco Use Disorder/prevention & control , Tobacco Use Disorder/rehabilitation , Tobacco Use Disorder/therapy , Colombia , Cohort StudiesABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: in Oman, there is a need to understand the profile of primary care physicians' (PCP) knowledge, attitude, and practice, and barriers (KAPB) towards tobacco dependence treatment (TDT). Their profile will directly affect their consultation and contribution to health care educators to develop an appropriate educational program for the PCPs. The aim of this study is to determine profiles in a cohort of PCP with regards to factors associated with physicians' perceived KAPB of providing TDT. METHODS: a cross-sectional survey was conducted for four months from September to December 2019. A sample of 226 (response rate is 71.2%) PCPs working for Muscat's health centers, the capital of Oman, was collected. A 2-step cluster method was used to separate the sample into sub-groups according to their demographic and KAPB scores. RESULTS: cluster analysis revealed two groups of PCPs who are different in demographics and KAPB scores. The PCPs in cluster B (27.4%) have higher educational levels, senior ranking, more males and older. They labeled as the "good knowledge, positive attitudes, and highly practices" group. The PCPs in cluster A comprised 72.6% of our samples. There are more females, younger, and with a junior ranking. This cluster was identified as the "lack of knowledge, moderate attitudes, and rarely practices" group. CONCLUSION: findings might help primary health care authorities to address this preventable issue and plan interventions to establish well-structured TDT clinics in the future.
Subject(s)
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Physicians, Primary Care/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Tobacco Use Disorder/rehabilitation , Adult , Age Factors , Attitude of Health Personnel , Cluster Analysis , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Oman , Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Sex Factors , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
Antecedentes y objetivo. Las intervenciones de des habituación basadas en el asesoramiento psicológicoy tratamiento farmacológico han demostrado ser las más eficaces para abandonar el tabaco. La terapia sustitutiva con nicotina, bupropión y vareniclina son lostratamientos farmacológicos de primera elección que han demostrado una mayor seguridad y eficacia, triplicando las posibilidades de cesación tabáquica. Sinembargo, en un escenario no financiado, el grado de adherencia a estos fármacos es bajo. Por todo ello, el objetivo del estudio es analizar la adherencia a dichosfármacos y los factores predictores de ella.Pacientes y métodos. Estudio transversal de una cohorte de 660 fumadores reclutados entre 2013 y 2017en un área sanitaria de Galicia incluidos en programas de deshabituación tabáquica. Se analizan las características de los pacientes y el porcentaje de adherenciaa los fármacos de cesación tabáquica.Resultados.Un 35% de los fumadores que acuden aconsultas de deshabituación tabáquica en nuestra áreasanitaria no retiran el fármaco previamente prescrito.Son factores predictores de adherencia a fármacos dedeshabituación tabáquica: estar en fase de preparación OR: 4,06 IC95% (1,58-6,39) p=0,003; realizarintentos previos de abandono en el último año OR:5,3 IC95% (1,3-7,1) p=0,016; uso de fármacos pre-viamente OR: 4,16 IC95 (1,7-6,2) p=0,0003; o elnúmero de consultas: OR: 1,6 IC95% (1,26-2,05)p=0,000.Conclusiones.La adherencia al tratamiento del tabaquismo es mejorable en nuestra área sanitaria. Lafase de abandono del fumador, los intentos previoscon tratamientos farmacológicos y la intensidad de la intervención son factores que se asocian a su implementación. (AU)
Backgrounds and objective. The smoking cessation interventions based on psychological advice and drugtreatment have been shown to be the most effectiveto stop smoking. Nicotine replacement therapy, bu-propion and varenicline are the drug treatments of first choice that have demonstrated better safety andefficacy, tripling the possibilities of smoking cessation.However, in an unfinanced setting, the degree of ad-herence to these drugs is low. Therefore, the objectiveof the study is to analyze adherence to said drugs andthe predictive factors of it.Patients and methods.Cross-sectional study of acohort of 660 smokers recruited between 2013 and2017 in a health care area of Galicia enrolled in smo-king cessation programs. The characteristics of thepatients and percentage of adherence to the smokingcessation drugs are analyzed.Results.A total of 35% of smokers who come to thesmoking cessation consultations in our health carearea do not obtain the previously prescribed drug.Predictive factors of adherence to smoking cessationdrugs are: being in the preparation phase: OR: 4.0695% CI (1.58-6.39) p=0.003, having made previousattempts to stop smoking in the last year: OR: 5.395% CI (1.3-7.1) p=0.016, previous use of drug: OR:4.16 95% CI (1.7-6.2) p=0.0003 or number of con-sultations: OR: 1.6 95% CI (1.26-2.05) p=0.000.Conclusions.Adherence to treatment of smoking ces-sation can be improved in our health care area. Thecessation phase of the smoker, previous attempts withdrug treatments and intensity of the intervention arethe factors associated to its implementation. (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Tobacco Use Disorder/prevention & control , Tobacco Use Disorder/rehabilitation , Tobacco Use Disorder/therapy , Tobacco Use Cessation/methods , Medication Adherence , Cross-Sectional Studies , SpainABSTRACT
Introduction: Smoking remains a worldwide epidemic, and despite an increase in public acceptance of the harms of tobacco use, it remains the leading cause of preventable death. It is estimated that up to 70% of all smokers express a desire to quit, but only 3-5% of them are successful.Areas covered: The goal of this review was to evaluate the current status of smoking cessation treatments and the feasibility of implementing personalized-medicine approaches to these pharmacotherapies. We evaluated the genetics associated with higher levels of nicotine addiction and follow with an analysis of the genetic variants that affect the nicotine metabolic ratio (NMR) and the FDA approved treatments for smoking cessation. We also highlighted the gaps in the process of translating current laboratory understanding into clinical practice, and the benefits of personalized treatment approaches for a successful smoking cessation strategy.Expert opinion: Evidence supports the use of tailored therapies to ensure that the most efficient treatments are utilized in an individual's smoking cessation efforts. An understanding of the genetic effects on the efficacy of individualized smoking cessation pharmacotherapies is key to smoking cessation, ideally utilizing a polygenetic risk score that considers all genetic variation.
Subject(s)
Nicotine/metabolism , Pharmacogenetics , Smoking Cessation/methods , Humans , Precision Medicine , Tobacco Use Disorder/genetics , Tobacco Use Disorder/rehabilitationABSTRACT
The German Respiratory Society (DGP) turns against the e-cigarette as a means for harm reduction because of potential health risk and dangers to young people. The aerosol of e-cigarettes contains toxic ingredients that have been shown to be damaging to the lungs, the cardiovascular system and the immune system and are potentially carcinogenic. Studies on e-cigarettes as a means of smoking cessation are not very convincing, in order to favor e-cigarettes over nicotine replacement therapy, which have been tried and tested for many years, or other drugs that reduce the desire to smoke.
Subject(s)
Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems , Smoking Cessation/methods , Tobacco Use Cessation Devices/adverse effects , Adolescent , Behavior Therapy , Humans , Tobacco Use Disorder/rehabilitationABSTRACT
The U.S. is in the midst of an opioid epidemic. At the same time, tobacco use remains the leading cause of preventable death and disability. While the shared biological underpinnings of nicotine and opioid addiction are well established, clinical implications for co-treatment of these two substance use disorders has not been emphasized in the literature, nor have researchers, clinicians, and policy makers adequately outlined pathways for incorporating co-treatment into existing clinical workflows. The current brief review characterizes the metabolic and neural mechanisms which mediate co-use of nicotine and opioids, and then outlines clinical and policy implications for concurrently addressing these two deadly epidemics. Screening, assessment, medication-assisted treatment (MAT), and tobacco-free policy are discussed. The evidence suggests that clinical care and policies that facilitate co-treatment are an expedient means of delivering healthcare to individuals that result in better health for the population while also meeting patients' substance abuse disorder recovery goals.
Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Nicotine/adverse effects , Nicotinic Agonists/therapeutic use , Opioid-Related Disorders/rehabilitation , Tobacco Use Disorder/rehabilitation , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Behavior, Addictive , Health Policy , Humans , Nicotine/therapeutic use , Opioid-Related Disorders/psychology , Standard of Care , Tobacco Use Disorder/psychologyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: People with serious mental illness (SMI) have a high smoking prevalence and low quit rates. Few cessation treatments are tested in smokers with SMI. Mental health (MH) providers are reluctant to address smoking. Proactive tobacco cessation treatment strategies reach out directly to smokers to offer counseling and medication and improve treatment utilization and quit rates. The current study is a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial of proactive outreach for tobacco cessation treatment in VA MH patients. AIMS AND METHODS: Participants (N = 1938, 83% male, mean age 55.7) across four recruitment sites, who were current smokers and had a MH visit in the past 12 months, were identified using the electronic medical record. Participants were randomized to Intervention (telephone outreach call plus invitation to engage in MH tailored telephone counseling and assistance obtaining nicotine replacement therapy) or Control (usual care). The current study assessed outcomes in participants with SMI (N = 982). RESULTS: Compared to the Control group, participants assigned to the Intervention group were more likely to engage in telephone counseling (22% vs. 3%) and use nicotine replacement therapy (51% vs. 41%). Participants in the Intervention group were more likely to be abstinent (7-day point prevalence; 18%) at 12 months than participants in the Control group (11%) but equally likely to make quit attempts. CONCLUSIONS: Proactive tobacco cessation treatment is an effective strategy for tobacco users with SMI. Proactive outreach had a particularly strong effect on counseling utilization. Future randomized clinical trials examining proactive tobacco treatment approaches in SMI treatment settings are needed. IMPLICATIONS: Few effective treatment models exist for smokers with SMI. Proactive tobacco cessation outreach with connections to MH tailored telephone counseling and medication promotes tobacco abstinence among smokers with SMI and is an effective treatment strategy for this underserved population.
Subject(s)
Mental Disorders/physiopathology , Smokers/psychology , Tobacco Use Cessation Devices/statistics & numerical data , Tobacco Use Cessation/methods , Tobacco Use Disorder/therapy , Counseling/methods , Electronic Health Records , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Telephone/statistics & numerical data , Tobacco Use Cessation/psychology , Tobacco Use Disorder/epidemiology , Tobacco Use Disorder/psychology , Tobacco Use Disorder/rehabilitation , Treatment Outcome , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to examine the association between electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use and smoking cessation among US adults. Duration of smoking cessation was taken into consideration because e-cigarette awareness and use were low in the United States before 2010. METHODS: A pooled analysis of the 2016 and 2017 National Health Interview Surveys on current (N = 9935) and former smokers (N = 14 754) was performed. Adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs), for sociodemographic factors, were calculated. FINDINGS: Current e-cigarette use was reported by 10.5% (95% CI = 9.8% to 11.3%) of current smokers and 4.5% (95% CI = 4.0% to 5.0%) of former smokers. Prevalence was high in former smokers of less than 1 year (16.8%, 95% CI = 13.9% to 20.2%), 1-3 years (15.0%, 95% CI = 13.0% to 17.3%), and 4-6 years (10.5%, 95% CI = 8.6% to 12.7%), and very low in former smokers of more than 6 years (0.7%, 95% CI = 0.5% to 0.9%). Similar patterns were observed for daily e-cigarette use. Current e-cigarette use was negatively associated with being a former smoker when quit duration was ignored (aPR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.59 to 0.69) but was positively associated with being a former smoker of less than 1 year (aPR = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.12 to 1.84) and 1-3 years (aPR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.03 to 1.42). Daily e-cigarette use was not associated with being a former smoker when quit duration was ignored but was positively associated with being a former smoker of less than 1 year (aPR = 3.44, 95% CI = 2.63 to 4.49), 1-3 years (aPR = 2.51, 95% CI = 2.13 to 2.95), and 4-6 years (aPR = 1.84, 95% CI = 1.49 to 2.26). CONCLUSIONS: Daily e-cigarette use is strongly associated with recent smoking cessation (≤6 years) among US adults. Frequency of e-cigarette use and smoking cessation duration are important parameters when analyzing the effects of e-cigarettes in population surveys. IMPLICATIONS: There is controversy on whether e-cigarettes promote or prevent smoking cessation. This study presents a detailed analysis of the association between e-cigarette use and smoking cessation in the United States considering frequency of e-cigarette use and duration of smoking cessation. The latter was considered appropriate because e-cigarette awareness and use were low in the United States before 2010. Daily e-cigarette use is strongly associated with recent (≤6 years) smoking cessation in the United States. Both frequency of e-cigarette use and duration of smoking cessation are important factors in determining the effects of e-cigarettes in population studies.
Subject(s)
Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems/statistics & numerical data , Smokers/psychology , Smoking Cessation/psychology , Smoking/psychology , Tobacco Use Disorder/rehabilitation , Vaping/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Algorithms , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Smoking/epidemiology , Smoking Cessation/methods , Smoking Cessation/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors , Tobacco Use Disorder/epidemiology , Tobacco Use Disorder/psychology , United States/epidemiology , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Subjective stress is a well-documented predictor of early smoking relapse, yet our understanding of stress and tobacco use is limited by reliance on self-reported measures of stress. We utilized a validated functional neuroimaging paradigm to examine whether stress exposure during early abstinence alters objective measures of brain function. METHODS: Seventy-five participants underwent blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during the Montreal Imaging Stress Task (MIST) on two occasions: once during smoking satiety and once following biochemically confirmed 24-hour abstinence (order counterbalanced). The primary outcome measure was brain response during stress (vs. control) blocks of the MIST, assessed using whole-brain analysis corrected for multiple comparisons using clusters determined by Z ≥ 3.1. RESULTS: Abstinence (vs. satiety) was associated with significantly increased activation in the left inferior frontal gyrus, a brain region associated with inhibitory control. Abstinence-induced change in brain response to stress was positively associated with change in self-reported stress. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides objective evidence that the brain response to stress is altered during the first 24 hours of a quit attempt compared to smoking satiety. IMPLICATIONS: These results point to the potential value of inoculating smokers with stress management training prior to a quit attempt.
Subject(s)
Brain/physiopathology , Nicotine/adverse effects , Smoking/physiopathology , Stress, Psychological/etiology , Substance Withdrawal Syndrome/physiopathology , Tobacco Use Disorder/physiopathology , Tobacco Use Disorder/rehabilitation , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Functional Neuroimaging , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Smoking Cessation/methods , Stress, Psychological/prevention & control , Young AdultABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: This review examines the evidence for the hardening hypothesis; that is, the prevalence of (1) becoming a former smoker is decreasing over time due to (2) decreased quit attempts, or (3) decreased success on a given quit attempt. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, PsychINFO, trial registries, and other databases were searched for population-based surveys that reported whether one of the aforementioned three outcomes decreased over time. RESULTS: None of the 26 studies found that conversion from current to former smoking, number of quit attempts, or success on a given quit attempt decreased over time and several found these increased over time. These results appeared to be similar across survey dates, duration of time examined, number of data points, data source, outcome definitions, and nationality. CONCLUSIONS: These results convincingly indicate hardening is not occurring in the general population of smokers. On the other hand, the prevalence of smoking is declining less among older and women smokers, and smokers with low education, low income, psychological problems, alcohol or drug abuse, medical problems, and greater nicotine dependence, than among those without these characteristics, presumably due to less quitting. Why this has not lead to decreased success in stopping smoking in the general population is unclear. IMPLICATIONS: Some have argued that a greater emphasis on harm reduction and more intensive or dependence-based treatments are needed because remaining smokers are those who are less likely to stop with current methods. This review finds no or little evidence for this assumption. Psychosocial factors, such as low education and psychiatric problems, predict less ability to quit and appear to becoming more prevalent among smokers. Why this is not leading to decreased quitting in the general population is an anomaly that may be worth trying to understand.
Subject(s)
Smoking Cessation/statistics & numerical data , Smoking/epidemiology , Tobacco Use Disorder/psychology , Tobacco Use Disorder/rehabilitation , Humans , Prevalence , Smoking Cessation/psychology , Tobacco Use Disorder/epidemiology , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
Objetivo: descrever a cessação do tabagismo entre usuários da estratégia saúde da família. Método: estudo longitudinal realizado em duas unidades de atenção básica no período de junho a dezembro de 2016 com usuários tabagistas participantes do Programa de Tratamento do Tabagismo. A cessação do tabagismo foi descrita segundo variáveis sociodemográficas e variáveis relacionadas à história tabagística e à participação no Programa. As análises bivariadas se basearam no teste exato de Fisher, nos testes não paramétrico U de Mann-Whitney e Correlação de Spearman); foi adotado nível de significância de 5%. Resultados: verificou-se que sexo masculino, uso de medicamento e número de sessões que o indivíduo participou relacionaram-se estatisticamente à cessação do tabagismo. Conclusão: O presente estudo evidenciou que a cessação do tabagismo é influenciada pelo sexo masculino, participação nas sessões propostas pelo programa de tabagismo e uso de medicamentos oferecidos pelo Sistema Único de Saúde.
Objective: to describe the cessation of smoking among Family Health Strategy users. Method: this longitudinal study was conducted at two primary care units from June to December 2016 with smokers participating in the Smoking Treatment Program. Cessation was described according to sociodemographic, smoking history and program participation variables. The bivariate analyzes were based on Fisher's exact test, non-parametric Mann-Whitney U tests, and Spearman's correlation; a 5% significance level was adopted. Results: cessation of smoking was found to be statistically related to male sex, medication use, and number of program sessions that the individual attended. Conclusion: this study showed that cessation of smoking is influenced by male sex, participation in smoking treatment program sessions, and use of medications offered by the Unified Health System.
Objetivo: describir el cese del tabaquismo entre usuarios de la estrategia de salud familiar. Método: estudio longitudinal realizado en dos unidades de atención básica en el período de junio a diciembre de 2016 junto a fumadores participantes del Programa de Tratamiento del Tabaquismo. El cese del tabaquismo se describió según variables sociodemográficas y variables relacionadas con la historia del fumador y la participación en el Programa. Los análisis bivariados se basaron en la prueba exacta de Fisher, en las pruebas no paramétricas U de Mann-Whitney y la Correlación de Spearman); se adoptó un nivel de significancia del 5%. Resultados: se verificó que el sexo masculino, el uso de remedios y el número de sesiones en que el individuo participó están relacionados estadísticamente al cese de fumar. Conclusión: el presente estudio evidenció que el cese del tabaquismo es influenciado por el sexo masculino, la participación en las sesiones propuestas por el programa de tabaquismo y el uso de remedios ofrecidos por el Sistema Único de Salud.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Public Health Nursing , Tobacco Use Disorder , Smoking Cessation/psychology , Smoking Prevention , Tobacco Use Disorder/prevention & control , Tobacco Use Disorder/rehabilitation , Epidemiology, Descriptive , Longitudinal StudiesABSTRACT
No disponible
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/rehabilitation , Tobacco Use Disorder/rehabilitation , Smoking Cessation/methods , Prospective Studies , Tobacco Use Cessation/methodsABSTRACT
While most tobacco users want to quit using tobacco, only a small minority succeed in quitting. Affective attitudes might influence health-related intentions and behavior. Emotional attachment to tobacco brands is an aspect of such affective attitudes. The aim of this study is to investigate emotional attachment to the personal snus or cigarette pack, as well as associations with quitting plans, among snus users and smokers. A sample of 1,450 smokers and 1,423 snus users (16-83 years, mean age 41 years, 41% women) was recruited from a web panel and weighted according to national statistics on smoking and snus use. Positive package-related feelings loaded on a single component in principal component analysis. Multinomial adjusted regressions were performed for smokers and snus users, with quitting plans as the dependent variable (no quitting plan, plan to quit within 6 months, plan to quit later) and emotional attachment as an independent variable. Smokers and snus users often endorsed statements expressing positive feelings related to buying and using their choice of tobacco brand, with endorsements ranging from 17% to 73%. Adjusted multinomial regressions showed that emotional attachment was associated with lower likelihood of planning to quit smoking within the next 6 months (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.68, p < .001) and lower likelihood of planning to quit snus use within the next 6 months (AOR = 0.54, p < .001) or later (AOR = 0.81, p < .01). Emotional attachment to tobacco brands is negatively associated with quitting plans among smokers and snus users. Policies to reduce brand attachment might lead to increased quitting plans and potentially increased quit attempts. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
Subject(s)
Association , Emotions , Motivation , Smoking Cessation/psychology , Smoking/psychology , Tobacco Use Disorder/psychology , Tobacco, Smokeless , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Norway , Odds Ratio , Tobacco Use Disorder/rehabilitation , Young AdultABSTRACT
A variety of neural systems are involved in the brain bases of tobacco addiction. Animal models of nicotine addiction have helped identify a variety of interacting neural systems involved in the pathophysiology of tobacco addiction. We and others have found that drug treatments affecting many of those neurotransmitter systems significantly decrease nicotine self-administration. These treatments include dopamine D1 receptor antagonist, histamine H1 antagonist, serotonin 5HT2C agonist, glutamate NMDA antagonist, nicotinic cholinergic α4ß2 partial agonist and nicotinic cholinergic α3ß4 antagonist acting drugs. It may be the case that combining treatments that affect different neural systems underlying addiction may be more efficacious than single drug treatment. In the current study, we tested the interactions of the D1 antagonist SCH-23390 and the serotonin 5HT2c agonist lorcaserin, both of which we have previously shown to significantly reduce nicotine self-administration. In the acute interactions study, both SCH-23390 and lorcaserin significantly reduced nicotine self-administration when given alone and had additive effects when given in combination. In the chronic study, each drug alone caused a significant decrease in nicotine self-administration. No additive effect was seen in combination because SCH-23390 given alone chronically was already highly effective. Chronic administration of the combination was not seen to significantly prolong reduced nicotine self-administration into the post-treatment period. This research shows that unlike lorcaserin and SCH-23390 interactions when given acutely, when given chronically in combination they do not potentiate or prolong each other's effects in reducing nicotine self-administration.
Subject(s)
Nicotine/administration & dosage , Receptor, Serotonin, 5-HT2C/physiology , Receptors, Dopamine D1/physiology , Self Administration , Animals , Benzazepines/pharmacology , Female , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Tobacco Use Disorder/rehabilitationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Up to 75% of inpatients with mental disorders smoke, and their life expectancy is decreased by up to 25 years compared to the general population. Hospitalized patients without monitoring after discharge quickly return to prehospitalization levels of tobacco use. The aim of the 061 QuitMental study is to assess the effectiveness of a multicomponent and motivational telephone-based intervention to stop smoking through a quitline addressed to smokers discharged from mental health hospital wards. METHODS: A pragmatic randomized controlled trial, single blinded, will include 2:1 allocation to the intervention group (IG) and the control group (CG). The IG will receive telephone assistance to quit smoking (including psychological and psychoeducational support, and pharmacological treatment advice if required) proactively for 12 months, and the CG will receive only brief advice after discharge. The sample size, calculated with an expected difference of 15 points on smoking abstinence between groups (IG, 20% and CG, 5%), α = 0.05, ß = 0.10, and 20% loss, will be 334 participants (IG) and 176 participants (CG). Participants are adult smokers discharged from psychiatric units of five acute hospitals. Measurements include dependent variables (self-reported 7-day point prevalence smoking abstinence (carbon monoxide verified), duration of abstinence, number of quit attempts, motivation, and self-efficacy to quit) and independent variables (age, sex, and psychiatric diagnoses). In data analysis, IG and CG data will be compared at 48 h and 1, 6, and 12 months post discharge. Multivariate logistic regression (odds ratio; 95% confidence interval) of dependent variables adjusted for potential confounding variables will be performed. The number needed to treat to achieve one abstinence outcome will be calculated. We will compare the abstinence rate of enrolled patients between groups. DISCUSSION: This trial evaluates an innovative format of a quitline for smokers with severe mental disorders regardless of their motivation to quit. If effective, the pragmatic nature of the study will permit transfer to routine clinical practice in the National Health System. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03230955 . Registered on 24 July 2017.
Subject(s)
Mental Disorders/psychology , Smoking Cessation/methods , Smoking Prevention/methods , Smoking/psychology , Telephone , Tobacco Use Disorder/rehabilitation , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Combined Modality Therapy , Female , Humans , Male , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Middle Aged , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Patient Education as Topic , Pragmatic Clinical Trials as Topic , Single-Blind Method , Smoking/adverse effects , Smoking Cessation Agents/therapeutic use , Spain , Time Factors , Tobacco Use Disorder/diagnosis , Tobacco Use Disorder/psychology , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
Despite the health benefits of tobacco control and cessation initiatives, tobacco users with behavioral health disorders (BHDs) have less access to evidence-based tobacco dependence treatment. Academic-community partnerships can help guide the translation of tobacco-related research findings and evidence-based guidelines into real-world applications. Through a comprehensive, evidence-based, multilevel, and multicomponent program, Taking Texas Tobacco Free (TTTF) facilitated the implementation of tobacco-free workplaces at 18 local mental health authorities in Texas, comprising over 250 individual community behavioral health centers. Compared with preprogram implementation, key accomplishments postimplementation include: (1) educated over 5,000 employees (nonclinical staff and providers) on the hazards of tobacco use and benefits of quitting, particularly among people with BHD; providers were additionally trained on the use of evidence based practices (EBPs; i.e. 5A's model, use of pharmacotherapy) to identify and treat tobacco use among people with BHD; (2) providers' significant increase in conducting tobacco-use assessments and using EBPs; (3) significant decrease in nonclinical staff tobacco use; (4) increase in quit attempts among consumers as evidenced by the demand for nicotine replacement therapy; and (5) reach to over 115,000 community members through outreach and education about the benefits of quitting tobacco use and maintaining a healthy lifestyle. TTTF demonstrated that the implementation of a comprehensive tobacco-free workplace program in behavioral health settings is feasible and beneficial, facilitating the capacity building of healthcare professionals and enhancing their resulting engagement in EBPs, and promoting healthier lifestyles among employees, consumers, and community members as a whole.